Table 6 Open in new tab Conceptual...

Conceptual moves	Example	Forum	Chat	Email	Total
Phase 1. Share information	On a slight tangent, with regard to the last point I think that Piaget would argue that the children involved need to be in their concrete operational period (over age 7) for this dialog to be meaningful (since before that time they are to egocentric to view from another’s perspective).	545	65	63	57	32	86	640	65
Phase 2. Discover inconsistencies	The only issue I’ve got with this is that it seems to go against what Vygotsky advocates about when to use peer tutoring, doesn’t it?	124	15	20	18	0	0	144	79
Phase 3. Negotiate meaning	What do y’all think? Am I on the right track?	56	7	13	12	0	0	69	7
Phase 4. Propose compromise	As a side note I seem to remember reading some research at one time that said that peer tutoring was beneficial for the tutorer, but not really for the tutoree (the kid being tutored). The tutorer gets to restate their knowledge and all of that other higher order thinking skills stuff, but the tutoree might just end up being confused by a fellow student who does not know any teaching skills.	12	1	0	0	0	0	12	1
Phase 5. Agree on compromise	After taking Piaget’s point of view for the thought activity this week, I agree with many of you that he would not suggest using peer tutoring in this situation.	21	2	3	3	0	0	24	2
Drafts		70	8	0	0	5	14	75	8
Resources		14	2	11	10	0	0	25	3
Total		842	100	110	100	37	100	989	100

Conceptual moves

Example

Forum

Chat

Total

No.

Phase 1. Share information

On a slight tangent, with regard to the last point I think that Piaget would argue that the children involved need to be in their concrete operational period (over age 7) for this dialog to be meaningful (since before that time they are to egocentric to view from another’s perspective).

545

640

Phase 2. Discover inconsistencies

The only issue I’ve got with this is that it seems to go against what Vygotsky advocates about when to use peer tutoring, doesn’t it?

124

144

Phase 3. Negotiate meaning

What do y’all think? Am I on the right track?

Phase 4. Propose compromise

As a side note I seem to remember reading some research at one time that said that peer tutoring was beneficial for the tutorer, but not really for the tutoree (the kid being tutored). The tutorer gets to restate their knowledge and all of that other higher order thinking skills stuff, but the tutoree might just end up being confused by a fellow student who does not know any teaching skills.

Phase 5. Agree on compromise

After taking Piaget’s point of view for the thought activity this week, I agree with many of you that he would not suggest using peer tutoring in this situation.

Drafts

Resources

Total

842

100

110

100

989

100

Conceptual moves	Example	Forum	Chat	Email	Total
Phase 1. Share information	On a slight tangent, with regard to the last point I think that Piaget would argue that the children involved need to be in their concrete operational period (over age 7) for this dialog to be meaningful (since before that time they are to egocentric to view from another’s perspective).	545	65	63	57	32	86	640	65
Phase 2. Discover inconsistencies	The only issue I’ve got with this is that it seems to go against what Vygotsky advocates about when to use peer tutoring, doesn’t it?	124	15	20	18	0	0	144	79
Phase 3. Negotiate meaning	What do y’all think? Am I on the right track?	56	7	13	12	0	0	69	7
Phase 4. Propose compromise	As a side note I seem to remember reading some research at one time that said that peer tutoring was beneficial for the tutorer, but not really for the tutoree (the kid being tutored). The tutorer gets to restate their knowledge and all of that other higher order thinking skills stuff, but the tutoree might just end up being confused by a fellow student who does not know any teaching skills.	12	1	0	0	0	0	12	1
Phase 5. Agree on compromise	After taking Piaget’s point of view for the thought activity this week, I agree with many of you that he would not suggest using peer tutoring in this situation.	21	2	3	3	0	0	24	2
Drafts		70	8	0	0	5	14	75	8
Resources		14	2	11	10	0	0	25	3
Total		842	100	110	100	37	100	989	100

Table 6

Open in new tab

Conceptual moves: Phase of knowledge construction

Conceptual moves	Example	Forum		Chat		Email		Total
Conceptual moves	Example	No.	%	No.	%	No.	%	No.	%
Phase 1. Share information	On a slight tangent, with regard to the last point I think that Piaget would argue that the children involved need to be in their concrete operational period (over age 7) for this dialog to be meaningful (since before that time they are to egocentric to view from another’s perspective).	545	65	63	57	32	86	640	65
Phase 2. Discover inconsistencies	The only issue I’ve got with this is that it seems to go against what Vygotsky advocates about when to use peer tutoring, doesn’t it?	124	15	20	18	0	0	144	79
Phase 3. Negotiate meaning	What do y’all think? Am I on the right track?	56	7	13	12	0	0	69	7
Phase 4. Propose compromise	As a side note I seem to remember reading some research at one time that said that peer tutoring was beneficial for the tutorer, but not really for the tutoree (the kid being tutored). The tutorer gets to restate their knowledge and all of that other higher order thinking skills stuff, but the tutoree might just end up being confused by a fellow student who does not know any teaching skills.	12	1	0	0	0	0	12	1
Phase 5. Agree on compromise	After taking Piaget’s point of view for the thought activity this week, I agree with many of you that he would not suggest using peer tutoring in this situation.	21	2	3	3	0	0	24	2
Drafts		70	8	0	0	5	14	75	8
Resources		14	2	11	10	0	0	25	3
Total		842	100	110	100	37	100	989	100

Conceptual moves	Example	Forum		Chat		Email		Total
Conceptual moves	Example	No.	%	No.	%	No.	%	No.	%
Phase 1. Share information	On a slight tangent, with regard to the last point I think that Piaget would argue that the children involved need to be in their concrete operational period (over age 7) for this dialog to be meaningful (since before that time they are to egocentric to view from another’s perspective).	545	65	63	57	32	86	640	65
Phase 2. Discover inconsistencies	The only issue I’ve got with this is that it seems to go against what Vygotsky advocates about when to use peer tutoring, doesn’t it?	124	15	20	18	0	0	144	79
Phase 3. Negotiate meaning	What do y’all think? Am I on the right track?	56	7	13	12	0	0	69	7
Phase 4. Propose compromise	As a side note I seem to remember reading some research at one time that said that peer tutoring was beneficial for the tutorer, but not really for the tutoree (the kid being tutored). The tutorer gets to restate their knowledge and all of that other higher order thinking skills stuff, but the tutoree might just end up being confused by a fellow student who does not know any teaching skills.	12	1	0	0	0	0	12	1
Phase 5. Agree on compromise	After taking Piaget’s point of view for the thought activity this week, I agree with many of you that he would not suggest using peer tutoring in this situation.	21	2	3	3	0	0	24	2
Drafts		70	8	0	0	5	14	75	8
Resources		14	2	11	10	0	0	25	3
Total		842	100	110	100	37	100	989	100

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only