Table 8
Open in new tab

Regressions predicting the amount of maintained social capital from demographic, attitudinal, and Facebook variables

Independent Variables1Model 1: Control Factors, Facebook Intensity, and Facebook X Self-Esteem Interaction
Model 2: Control Factors, Facebook Intensity, and Facebook X Satisfaction with MSU Life Interaction
Scaled BetapScaled Betap
Intercept3.57****3.60****
Gender: male−0.02−0.02
Gender: female0.020.02
Ethnicity: white0.23***0.23***
Ethnicity: nonwhite−0.23***−0.23***
Income0.080.08
Year in school−0.09−0.08
State residence: in-state0.060.05
State residence: out-of-state−0.06−0.05
Local residence: on campus−0.06−0.05
Local residence: off campus0.060.05
Fraternity/sorority member−0.02−0.03
Not member of fraternity/sorority0.020.03
Hours of Internet use per day0.26*0.27*
Self-esteem0.30***0.31***
Satisfaction with life at MSU−0.02−0.04
Facebook (FB) intensity0.37***0.36***
Self-esteem by FB intensity4−0.11
Satisfaction by FB intensity−0.29
N = 269F = 5.40, ****F = 5.57, ****
Adj. R2= .16Adj. R2= .17
Independent Variables1Model 1: Control Factors, Facebook Intensity, and Facebook X Self-Esteem Interaction
Model 2: Control Factors, Facebook Intensity, and Facebook X Satisfaction with MSU Life Interaction
Scaled BetapScaled Betap
Intercept3.57****3.60****
Gender: male−0.02−0.02
Gender: female0.020.02
Ethnicity: white0.23***0.23***
Ethnicity: nonwhite−0.23***−0.23***
Income0.080.08
Year in school−0.09−0.08
State residence: in-state0.060.05
State residence: out-of-state−0.06−0.05
Local residence: on campus−0.06−0.05
Local residence: off campus0.060.05
Fraternity/sorority member−0.02−0.03
Not member of fraternity/sorority0.020.03
Hours of Internet use per day0.26*0.27*
Self-esteem0.30***0.31***
Satisfaction with life at MSU−0.02−0.04
Facebook (FB) intensity0.37***0.36***
Self-esteem by FB intensity4−0.11
Satisfaction by FB intensity−0.29
N = 269F = 5.40, ****F = 5.57, ****
Adj. R2= .16Adj. R2= .17
1

Notes: Nominal factors expanded to all levels.

2

Continuous factors centered by mean, scaled by range/2.

3

* p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, **** p < .0001.

4

Only one interaction term was entered at a time in each regression.

Table 8
Open in new tab

Regressions predicting the amount of maintained social capital from demographic, attitudinal, and Facebook variables

Independent Variables1Model 1: Control Factors, Facebook Intensity, and Facebook X Self-Esteem Interaction
Model 2: Control Factors, Facebook Intensity, and Facebook X Satisfaction with MSU Life Interaction
Scaled BetapScaled Betap
Intercept3.57****3.60****
Gender: male−0.02−0.02
Gender: female0.020.02
Ethnicity: white0.23***0.23***
Ethnicity: nonwhite−0.23***−0.23***
Income0.080.08
Year in school−0.09−0.08
State residence: in-state0.060.05
State residence: out-of-state−0.06−0.05
Local residence: on campus−0.06−0.05
Local residence: off campus0.060.05
Fraternity/sorority member−0.02−0.03
Not member of fraternity/sorority0.020.03
Hours of Internet use per day0.26*0.27*
Self-esteem0.30***0.31***
Satisfaction with life at MSU−0.02−0.04
Facebook (FB) intensity0.37***0.36***
Self-esteem by FB intensity4−0.11
Satisfaction by FB intensity−0.29
N = 269F = 5.40, ****F = 5.57, ****
Adj. R2= .16Adj. R2= .17
Independent Variables1Model 1: Control Factors, Facebook Intensity, and Facebook X Self-Esteem Interaction
Model 2: Control Factors, Facebook Intensity, and Facebook X Satisfaction with MSU Life Interaction
Scaled BetapScaled Betap
Intercept3.57****3.60****
Gender: male−0.02−0.02
Gender: female0.020.02
Ethnicity: white0.23***0.23***
Ethnicity: nonwhite−0.23***−0.23***
Income0.080.08
Year in school−0.09−0.08
State residence: in-state0.060.05
State residence: out-of-state−0.06−0.05
Local residence: on campus−0.06−0.05
Local residence: off campus0.060.05
Fraternity/sorority member−0.02−0.03
Not member of fraternity/sorority0.020.03
Hours of Internet use per day0.26*0.27*
Self-esteem0.30***0.31***
Satisfaction with life at MSU−0.02−0.04
Facebook (FB) intensity0.37***0.36***
Self-esteem by FB intensity4−0.11
Satisfaction by FB intensity−0.29
N = 269F = 5.40, ****F = 5.57, ****
Adj. R2= .16Adj. R2= .17
1

Notes: Nominal factors expanded to all levels.

2

Continuous factors centered by mean, scaled by range/2.

3

* p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, **** p < .0001.

4

Only one interaction term was entered at a time in each regression.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close