Table 3.

List of phyla which showed significant (10% false discovery rate) response to land-use change (LUC).

Average relative abundance (%) ± SD
Corrected Response
LUC typePhlyumP-valueP-valueOld LUNew LUto LUC
Cropland to grasslandVerrucomicrobia0.0010.0160.53 ± 0.331.13 ± 0.81Increase
Cropland to forestBacteroidetes0.0060.0490.82 ± 0.550.14 ± 0.16Decrease
Nitrospirae0.0110.0640.70 ± 0.700.04 ± 0.04Decrease
Proteobacteria0.0040.03735.22 ± 6.4835.41 ± 12.82Increase
Grassland to croplandGemmatimonadetes0.0010.0160.26 ± 0.140.96 ± 0.55Increase
Planctomycetes0.0090.0600.82 ± 0.380.63 ± 0.23Decrease
Verrucomicrobia0.0030.0372.46 ± 1.580.89 ± 0.38Decrease
Grassland to forestNone
Average relative abundance (%) ± SD
Corrected Response
LUC typePhlyumP-valueP-valueOld LUNew LUto LUC
Cropland to grasslandVerrucomicrobia0.0010.0160.53 ± 0.331.13 ± 0.81Increase
Cropland to forestBacteroidetes0.0060.0490.82 ± 0.550.14 ± 0.16Decrease
Nitrospirae0.0110.0640.70 ± 0.700.04 ± 0.04Decrease
Proteobacteria0.0040.03735.22 ± 6.4835.41 ± 12.82Increase
Grassland to croplandGemmatimonadetes0.0010.0160.26 ± 0.140.96 ± 0.55Increase
Planctomycetes0.0090.0600.82 ± 0.380.63 ± 0.23Decrease
Verrucomicrobia0.0030.0372.46 ± 1.580.89 ± 0.38Decrease
Grassland to forestNone

The P-values were derived from paired t-tests and corrected according to the Benjamini-Hochberg method. Only phyla that had at least 0.20% average relative abundance in either the reference or the conversion plots of a LUC type were included in the analysis.

Table 3.

List of phyla which showed significant (10% false discovery rate) response to land-use change (LUC).

Average relative abundance (%) ± SD
Corrected Response
LUC typePhlyumP-valueP-valueOld LUNew LUto LUC
Cropland to grasslandVerrucomicrobia0.0010.0160.53 ± 0.331.13 ± 0.81Increase
Cropland to forestBacteroidetes0.0060.0490.82 ± 0.550.14 ± 0.16Decrease
Nitrospirae0.0110.0640.70 ± 0.700.04 ± 0.04Decrease
Proteobacteria0.0040.03735.22 ± 6.4835.41 ± 12.82Increase
Grassland to croplandGemmatimonadetes0.0010.0160.26 ± 0.140.96 ± 0.55Increase
Planctomycetes0.0090.0600.82 ± 0.380.63 ± 0.23Decrease
Verrucomicrobia0.0030.0372.46 ± 1.580.89 ± 0.38Decrease
Grassland to forestNone
Average relative abundance (%) ± SD
Corrected Response
LUC typePhlyumP-valueP-valueOld LUNew LUto LUC
Cropland to grasslandVerrucomicrobia0.0010.0160.53 ± 0.331.13 ± 0.81Increase
Cropland to forestBacteroidetes0.0060.0490.82 ± 0.550.14 ± 0.16Decrease
Nitrospirae0.0110.0640.70 ± 0.700.04 ± 0.04Decrease
Proteobacteria0.0040.03735.22 ± 6.4835.41 ± 12.82Increase
Grassland to croplandGemmatimonadetes0.0010.0160.26 ± 0.140.96 ± 0.55Increase
Planctomycetes0.0090.0600.82 ± 0.380.63 ± 0.23Decrease
Verrucomicrobia0.0030.0372.46 ± 1.580.89 ± 0.38Decrease
Grassland to forestNone

The P-values were derived from paired t-tests and corrected according to the Benjamini-Hochberg method. Only phyla that had at least 0.20% average relative abundance in either the reference or the conversion plots of a LUC type were included in the analysis.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close