1-20 of 44986
Sort by
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Mayur S Mitra and others
Toxicological Sciences, kfaf059, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf059
Published: 02 May 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Mayur S Mitra and others
Toxicological Sciences, kfaf060, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf060
Published: 02 May 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Amanda Jurgelewicz and others
Toxicological Sciences, kfaf061, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf061
Published: 02 May 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Igor N Zelko and others
Toxicological Sciences, kfaf055, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf055
Published: 29 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Ivan Rusyn
Toxicological Sciences, kfaf058, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf058
Published: 29 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fenghong Wang and others
Toxicological Sciences, kfaf046, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf046
Published: 26 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Lyda Yuliana Parra-Forero and others
Toxicological Sciences, kfaf057, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf057
Published: 25 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Yuki Seki and others
Toxicological Sciences, kfaf056, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf056
Published: 24 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zachery R Jarrell and others
Toxicological Sciences, kfaf054, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf054
Published: 23 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Antero Vieira Silva and others
Toxicological Sciences, kfaf052, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf052
Published: 21 April 2025
Journal Article
Rebecca Kohnken and others
Toxicological Sciences, Volume 205, Issue 1, May 2025, Pages 233–244, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf021
Published: 12 April 2025
Image
Published: 12 April 2025
Fig. 5. Representative photomicrographs of microscopic findings in the heart of rats administered ABBV-712 alone (A-2X, B-20X, inset) or co-dosed with atenolol (C-20X) for 14 d. Note the extensive area in the subendocardial myocardium (box) of the interventricular septum affected by increased cellularity (A
Journal Article
Tasha Pontifex and others
Toxicological Sciences, kfaf050, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf050
Published: 12 April 2025
Image
Published: 12 April 2025
Fig. 3. Effect of DBP0.1 exposure on weight gain patterns of pregnant dams. (A) Daily weight gain (CT: N  = 15; DBP0.1: N  = 14), (B) adiposity (body fat %; n  = 6 for each group), and the weight of maternal (C) heart, (D) lung, (E) kidney, (F) liver at GD18.5 in CD-1 mice (C-F: CT group: N  = 12; DBP0.
Image
Published: 12 April 2025
Fig. 1. Characteristics of contractility in the 3D ECTs and 2D hiPSC-CMs. A) Representative waveform plotting force (converted from displacement) vs. time in the 3D ECTs. B) Typical motion waveforms plotting speed (the derivative of displacement) vs. time in the 2D hiPSC-CMs. C) Variability in baseline acti
Image
Published: 12 April 2025
Fig. 4. Continued
Image
Published: 12 April 2025
Fig. 4. Continued
Image
Published: 12 April 2025
Fig. 2. Effect of DBP0.1 exposure on female fertility parameters in control (CT) and DBP0.1 treated CD-1 mice. (A) Pregnancy rate ( n  = 18 for each group), (B) litter size (CT: N  = 12; DBP0.1: N  = 14), (C) male/female fetus ratio per litter (CT: N  = 12; DBP0.1: N  = 14), (D) representative histology
Image
Published: 12 April 2025
Fig. 4. Effect of DBP0.1 exposure on fetal and placental weight at GD18.5. DBP0.1 exposure did not alter fetal weight (A), whereas it significantly increased placental weight (B) and fetal/placental weight ratio (reflecting placental efficiency) (C) in female (F) and male (M) fetuses in CD-1 mice by GD18.5
Image
Published: 12 April 2025
Fig. 5. Lipid disposition in (A) fetal labyrinth, (B) maternal decidual, and (C) representative Oil Red O staining images of female and male mice placental tissues from CT and DBP0.1 groups. *: Differ between CT and DBP0.1 groups within the same fetal sex; Δ : Differ between female and male fetuses within