Abstract

Introduction

The ICSD-3-TR defines idiopathic hypersomnia in terms of objective sleep times as sleeping at least 11 hours using 24-hour polysomnography or wrist actigraphy averaged over at least 7 days. Published studies on sleep duration are generally limited by lower sleep duration cut-offs (e.g., ≥ 9 hours), so prevalence data on longer sleep durations are missing. This study used clinical questionnaire data from Mayo Clinic patients to characterize longer sleep times and excessive daytime sleepiness in this population.

Methods

We retrospectively identified patients who answered questions about subjective sleep times and excessive daytime sleepiness, using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), as part of their evaluation in a sleep clinic across the Mayo Clinic Enterprise from 2017 to 2023. Demographic data and sleep disorder diagnoses were then analyzed.

Results

Patients (N=25,480) with subjective nocturnal sleep times of ≥ 9 (n=2721, 10.7%), ≥ 10 (n=1059, 4.2%), and ≥ 11 hours (n=349, 1.4%) had an ESS ≥ 10 in 33.5%, 41.0%, and 51.3% of the time, respectively. 3.6% (age 53.2±19.7; 58.9% female), 1.7% (age 53.1±20.4; 58.1% female), and 0.7% (age 49.8±19.9; 58.1% female) of the patients reported an ESS ≥ 10 and subjective nocturnal sleep times of ≥ 9, ≥ 10, and ≥ 11 hours per night, respectively. After adjusting for age and sex, patients with more than one diagnostic entry compared to those with one or fewer diagnostic entries for idiopathic hypersomnia with long sleep time (OR=12.75, 95% CI [6.09, 24.52], p< 0.001) and narcolepsy with cataplexy (OR=5.53, 95% CI [1.31, 15.84], p=0.005) were significantly more likely to report ESS ≥ 10 and subjective nocturnal sleep times ≥ 11 hours per night.

Conclusion

Less than 1% of patients presenting to a Mayo Clinic sleep specialist have self-reported metrics (i.e., ESS ≥ 10 and subjective nocturnal sleep times ≥ 11 per night) consistent with basic clinical features of idiopathic hypersomnia with long sleep time. Additional data analyses (e.g., comorbid conditions, social history, and laboratory results) are underway.

Support (if any)

 

This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.