Abstract

Introduction

In the REST-ON trial (NCT02720744), once-nightly sodium oxybate (ON-SXB; FT218) was associated with significant improvement vs placebo for mean sleep latency on the Maintenance of Wakefulness test (MWT) and Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) rating in the overall population (both P<0.001) and in subgroups of participants taking concomitant stimulants (both P<0.05). Post-hoc analyses of ON-SXB efficacy on disturbed nocturnal sleep (DNS) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score were conducted.

Methods

Participants (≥16 years of age) with narcolepsy type 1 or 2 were randomized 1:1 to ON-SXB (1 week, 4.5 g; 2 weeks, 6 g; 5 weeks, 7.5 g; 5 weeks, 9 g) or placebo. Mixed-effects models for repeated measures calculated P values for change from baseline vs placebo at weeks 3 (6 g), 8 (7.5 g), and 13 (9 g) in ESS score, sleep shifts (ie, number of shifts from N1, N2, N3, and rapid eye movement [REM] sleep to Wake and from N2, N3, and REM sleep to N1), nocturnal arousals (NA), and patient-reported outcomes of sleep quality and refreshing nature of sleep on a 100-point visual analog scale.

Results

In the modified intent-to-treat population (n=190), 119 participants took concomitant stimulants (ON-SXB, n=66; placebo, n=53); 71 did not take stimulants (ON-SXB, n=31; placebo, n=40). Improvements with ON-SXB vs placebo were reported: ESS (stimulants: all doses, P≤0.01; no stimulants: 6 g, directional improvement; 7.5 g, P<0.01; 9 g, P<0.001), sleep shifts (stimulants: 6 g, P<0.01; 7.5 and 9 g, P<0.001; no stimulants: all doses P<0.001), NA (stimulants: 6 g, directional improvement; 7.5 g, P<0.01; 9 g, P=0.001; no stimulants: 6 and 7.5 g, P<0.05; 9 g, P=0.01), sleep quality (stimulants: 6 and 7.5 g, P<0.01; 9 g, P<0.05; no stimulants: all doses P<0.001), refreshing nature of sleep (stimulants: 6 and 9 g, P<0.05; 7.5 g, P<0.001; no stimulants: 6 and 7.5 g, P<0.01; 9 g, P=0.001).

Conclusion

Data from these post-hoc analyses were consistent with the previously reported results from REST-ON and support the efficacy of ON-SXB for EDS and DNS, as measured by objective and subjective endpoints whether or not stimulants were concurrently used.

Support (If Any)

Avadel Pharmaceuticals

This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.