Abstract

Background

The clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia is suspected to include several distinct subgroups of patients, but reliable neurobiological boundaries to differentiate the subgroups remain elusive. These unknown subgroups increase the variance of biological measures within the clinically identified patient group, deflating the group-level estimates of causal factors and treatment effects. Prior studies seeking homogeneous subgroups of schizophrenia based on brain-based measures have not found consistent solutions. A major limitation in prior studies is the assumption that healthy controls form a relatively homogeneous group, that deviates biologically from the patient subgroups. As a result, cluster solutions have been generally sought only within patient samples, without pooling the patient and control data. In the current study, we assessed whether the regional values of cortical thickness estimated from structural MRI are sufficiently sensitive to identify subgroups of patients and healthy controls.

Methods

We used high resolution (3 Tesla) imaging in 179 patients with schizophrenia and 77 healthy controls, to investigate possible subtypes of schizophrenia. K-means algorithm was applied to perform clustering analysis on cortical thickness data from 68 regions in Desikan-Kiliany Atlas using Freesurfer software, and gap statistics was used to find best cluster solution. General linear models were used to compare cortical thickness, cognitive performance and symptom severity among the identified clusters.

Results

A 3-cluster solution provided the most optimal clustering, with the first cluster (C1) comprised almost entirely of patients, while the other 2 clusters (C2 and C3) including a substantial number of patients as well as control subjects. There was no significant difference in cognitive performance among the 3 schizophrenia subtypes. C1 was the most morphologically impoverished group with significantly thin cortex in multiple brain regions but had no more symptom/cognitive burden than the other subtypes. C2 was an intermediate group with significant thinning in selected brain regions, with higher burden of negative symptoms. C3 was the morphologically most intact subgroup with a cortical thickness profile like healthy controls, despite having more severe delusions. In addition, C1 also had higher duration of exposure to medication among the 3 patient groups, with longer illness duration.

Discussion

We report 3 major findings: 1) 3 distinct morphological profiles are observed in schizophrenia 2) A large number of patients with schizophrenia have the cortical morphological profiles of apparently normal healthy controls 3) cortical thickness profiles do not map well to cognitive and symptomatic profiles in schizophrenia. Interestingly, we observed a pattern of morphological preservation among patients with higher levels of delusion. We provide evidence for the presence of morphological subgroups of schizophrenia, the delineation of which may help stratifying patients for future prognostic studies.

This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)