-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Marina Simeonova, Jolanta Piszczek, Sannifer Hoi, Curtis Harder, Gustavo Pelligra, 20 Evaluation of Compliance with the 2017 Canadian Pediatric Society (CPS) Position Statement for the Management of Newborns at Risk for Early-Onset Sepsis (EOS): A Retrospective Cohort Study, Paediatrics & Child Health, Volume 25, Issue Supplement_2, August 2020, Pages e7–e8, https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxaa068.019
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Due to the high mortality and non-specific clinical presentation, clinicians often empirically treat newborns at risk of early-onset sepsis (EOS). Recently, the Canadian Pediatric Society (CPS) published updated recommendations that promote a more judicious approach to EOS management.
To examine the compliance with the CPS position statement at a tertiary perinatal site.
A retrospective chart review was conducted between Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2018. Newborns were categorized into 5 groups, depending on the number of EOS risk factors. Management strategies were assessed against the CPS recommendations to establish the rate of non-compliance. The reason for non-compliance, readmission rate and rate of culture-positive EOS were also examined. Results were expressed using descriptive statistics. A Chi-squared test was conducted to assess the association between the readmission rate and initial management.
The total non-compliance rate was 47%. This was mostly due to inappropriate investigations in lower EOS risk groups [3 (71%) and 4 (94%)] and withholding antibiotics in groups with more risk factors [1 (43%) and 2 (67%)]. The rate of readmission for a septic work-up was low (<2%), and no newborns had culture-positive EOS. There was no significant association between the readmission rate and initial management (p=0.13).
Although the rate of non-compliance to the 2017 CPS recommendations was high, no neonates had culture-positive EOS, suggesting that our management strategies may be too aggressive. An initial observational period for newborns at lower EOS risk (groups 3 and 4) may warrant consideration for future quality improvement initiatives.