Abstract

Studying massive binaries in different evolution stages or environments may help us to solve the problem of the evolution of massive binaries. The metallicity in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) is much lower than that in our Milky Way, and binaries in the SMC are rarely studied. OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 is a short-period early-type binary with a period of |${0{_{.}^{\circ}}6317643}$| in the SMC. We use the Wilson–Devinney code to analyze its light curves. The result shows that OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 is an overcontact binary with a high mass ratio of 0.900 and a fill-out factor of |$35.9\%$|⁠. The OC curves of the period of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 show a long-term increase with a cyclic oscillation of amplitude A = 0.00503 d and period P3 = 14.80 yr. All the evidence above indicates that OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 is in the Case A mass transfer evolutionary state. The mass transfer rate |$\dot{M}_2 = -5.67 \times 10^{-7} M_{\odot }\:$|yr1 is derived and used to explain the continuous period increase. Because both components of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 are early-type stars, the existence of a third body may be the reason for the cyclic change in period. The mass of the third body is derived to be no less than 0.70 M and the orbital separation to be no more than 13.22 au. Combining the result of light-curve analysis, the third body tends to be a low-mass late-type star. Such high-mass-ratio binaries play an important role in the evolution of early-type binaries. Thus, researching OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 provides the basis for us to study the formation and evolution of early-type contact binaries.

1 Introduction

The binary system OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 has galactic coordinates of |$l = {302{_{.}^{\circ}}96}$| and |$b = -{43{_{.}^{\circ}}74}$|⁠. It was discovered by The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE, Udalski et al. 1998). This system was classified as an early B-type system (Wyrzykowski et al. 2004) and as a contact eclipsing binary (Pawlak et al. 2016). In the present paper, we analyze OGLE light curves and investigate the period variation using all available data. The structure and evolutionary state of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 are discussed using the result of photometric solutions and the period change.

OGLE used the 1.3 m Warsaw University Telescope at Las Campanas Observatory in Chile to observe the Milky Way and the Small and Large Magellanic Clouds (SMC and LMC), and discovered thousands of eclipsing binary stars. There are more than 48000 eclipsing and ellipsoidal binary systems in Magellanic System to be found in OGLE collections (Pawlak et al. 2016). Two optical photometric bands, Johnson V and Cousins I bands, are contained by the observations; the I band is the default, with about 15 times more epochs than the V band. These light curves are confirmed by experts and divided into different types such as contact or semi-detached binary stars. Among all 48605 eclipsing binaries, only 628 are classified as contact binaries while 131 of them are in the SMC. This amount is obviously much less than the true amount of those in the SMC, and this is one of the reasons why binaries in the Milky Way are studied well while those in the SMC are rarely studied.

The period of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 is |${0{_{.}^{\circ}}6317643}$| and its VI color index is −0.199 mag(not fixed). These show that OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 is an early-type contact binary which might have a big fill-out factor due to its short period. Some other examples include V758 Cen (Lipari & Sistero 1985), V701 Sco (Bell & Malcolm 1987), V593 Cen (Lapasset et al. 1988), RZ Pyx (Zhao et al. 2018a), and BH Cen (Zhao et al. 2018b). Contact binaries are quite important in star evolution: for both components of a contact binary have filled its critical Roche lobe which makes it completely different from single stars. The evolution of both components is influenced by each other due to their interaction. Research shows that over |$70\%$| of all massive stars will exchange mass with their companion (Sana et al. 2012). We expect OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 to be a system with great interaction which may lead to an explosion in the end.

The formation of massive binary stars is still unsolved, while the SMC gives us a condition to study the difference between the binaries in different natural conditions, because the value of Fe/H in the SMC is smaller than that in the Milky Way. In this research, we analyzed the light curves with the Wilson–Devinney (WD) method and studied the OC curve using data over a 19-year period. We obtain the physical parameters of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 and a third body that may exist. We hope this research, and further research of binaries in the SMC, could give us more and more knowledge about the formation of massive binaries.

2 Observations

The light ephemeris of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063,
(1)
was given by OGLE IV. We also observed the system on two nights, 2016 September 10 and 12, using the 1024 × 1024 pixel CCD (designated as STE4) attached to the 1 m telescope at the South African Astronomical Observatory, which has a Cassegrain design and an f-ratio of 16, to get complete multi-band light curves. During these observations, the filters we used are the same as a standard Bessel system. Differently from OGLE data, this observation is continuous, which makes the result of light curve analysis more precise. The differential photometry method was used when reducing the observed images to get more precise light curves.

Now we have I- and V-band light curves from OGLE II, III, and IV, and BVR light curves from the 1 m telescope at the South African Astronomical Observatory. We only use the I-band data from OGLE since the V-band data are not sufficient for analysis. We plotted the light curves using the phase given by Pawlak et al. (2016). The 1 m telescope light curves are shown in figure 1a. In differential photometry, Var-Com means the magnitude of the variable star (OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063) minus the magnitude of the comparison star, and Com-Check is the comparison star minus the check star. Figure 1b is the light curve given by OGLE IV. The light curves show typical eclipsing W Ursae Majoris (EW)-type variation. Both maxima and minima are almost equal.

(a) Light curves observed at the South African Astronomical Observatory; different symbols represent different observation days. (b) Light curves collected from the OGLE IV; the open triangles and circles represent the V and IC bands.
Fig. 1.

(a) Light curves observed at the South African Astronomical Observatory; different symbols represent different observation days. (b) Light curves collected from the OGLE IV; the open triangles and circles represent the V and IC bands.

3 Orbital period investigation of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063

As we know, the research of the period variation of a binary system is an important part of studying its evolutionary states and dynamic evolution process. We can get more information about the period changes from the OC (observational times of light minimum − calculated times of light minimum) curves directly. Using the light curves from the 1 m telescope, we derived the minima times of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063, but we cannot use the OGLE data directly since there are fewer than 10 data points in one period, as shown in figure 2, which is not enough for parabola fitting method. To solve this problem we have to take the average of the light curve. We cut the whole long time light curve into several sectors, usually around 300 days per sector, to make sure there are enough data points for fitting, usually more than 100 points in one sector. Then we convert the HJD to the phase so we can derive the minimum by the parabola fitting method, just as shown in figure 2. As a result, using the delta phase we can get an average minimum time of the sector. All eclipsing times and their errors are listed in table 1. These data can be very helpful in analyzing the orbital period changes and studying the mass transfer. This kind of method has also been used by Li et al. (2022b, 2022c) to calculate many minima.

Eclipse time of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 obtained from OGLE IV. The upper panel shows the time series and the lower panel shows the orbital phase light curve with the fitting parabola around the time of minimum.
Fig. 2.

Eclipse time of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 obtained from OGLE IV. The upper panel shows the time series and the lower panel shows the orbital phase light curve with the fitting parabola around the time of minimum.

Table 1.

New eclipse times for OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063.

Eclipse timeErrorEpochEclipse timeErrorEpoch
HJD−2450000± (d)numberSourceHJD−2450000± (d)numberSource
642.261100.000677−11080.5OGLE3784.978210.00112−6106OGLE
753.135510.00117−10905OGLE4025.364070.00132−5725.5OGLE
843.478380.00112−10762OGLE4274.910160.00136−5330.5OGLE
1141.671240.00163−10290OGLE4442.326440.00087−5065.5OGLE
1426.597680.00206−9839OGLE4629.959940.00171−4768.5OGLE
1669.830630.00177−9454OGLE4766.421640.00322−4552.5OGLE
1991.083350.00198−8945.5OGLE5441.142530.00158−3484.5OGLE
2284.855090.00102−8480.5OGLE5528.954190.00238−3345.5OGLE
2475.646410.0012−8178.5OGLE5702.056120.00219−3071.5OGLE
2642.431460.00146−7914.5OGLE5815.143200.00204−2892.5OGLE
2800.373260.00144−7664.5OGLE5877.054090.00173−2794.5OGLE
2959.894760.00171−7412OGLE6029.309320.00235−2553.5OGLE
3192.069290.0019−7044.5OGLE6357.826270.00216−2033.5OGLE
3351.588620.00156−6792OGLE7642.525550.00110this work
3649.149090.00129−6321OGLE7642.841500.000940.5this work
Eclipse timeErrorEpochEclipse timeErrorEpoch
HJD−2450000± (d)numberSourceHJD−2450000± (d)numberSource
642.261100.000677−11080.5OGLE3784.978210.00112−6106OGLE
753.135510.00117−10905OGLE4025.364070.00132−5725.5OGLE
843.478380.00112−10762OGLE4274.910160.00136−5330.5OGLE
1141.671240.00163−10290OGLE4442.326440.00087−5065.5OGLE
1426.597680.00206−9839OGLE4629.959940.00171−4768.5OGLE
1669.830630.00177−9454OGLE4766.421640.00322−4552.5OGLE
1991.083350.00198−8945.5OGLE5441.142530.00158−3484.5OGLE
2284.855090.00102−8480.5OGLE5528.954190.00238−3345.5OGLE
2475.646410.0012−8178.5OGLE5702.056120.00219−3071.5OGLE
2642.431460.00146−7914.5OGLE5815.143200.00204−2892.5OGLE
2800.373260.00144−7664.5OGLE5877.054090.00173−2794.5OGLE
2959.894760.00171−7412OGLE6029.309320.00235−2553.5OGLE
3192.069290.0019−7044.5OGLE6357.826270.00216−2033.5OGLE
3351.588620.00156−6792OGLE7642.525550.00110this work
3649.149090.00129−6321OGLE7642.841500.000940.5this work
Table 1.

New eclipse times for OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063.

Eclipse timeErrorEpochEclipse timeErrorEpoch
HJD−2450000± (d)numberSourceHJD−2450000± (d)numberSource
642.261100.000677−11080.5OGLE3784.978210.00112−6106OGLE
753.135510.00117−10905OGLE4025.364070.00132−5725.5OGLE
843.478380.00112−10762OGLE4274.910160.00136−5330.5OGLE
1141.671240.00163−10290OGLE4442.326440.00087−5065.5OGLE
1426.597680.00206−9839OGLE4629.959940.00171−4768.5OGLE
1669.830630.00177−9454OGLE4766.421640.00322−4552.5OGLE
1991.083350.00198−8945.5OGLE5441.142530.00158−3484.5OGLE
2284.855090.00102−8480.5OGLE5528.954190.00238−3345.5OGLE
2475.646410.0012−8178.5OGLE5702.056120.00219−3071.5OGLE
2642.431460.00146−7914.5OGLE5815.143200.00204−2892.5OGLE
2800.373260.00144−7664.5OGLE5877.054090.00173−2794.5OGLE
2959.894760.00171−7412OGLE6029.309320.00235−2553.5OGLE
3192.069290.0019−7044.5OGLE6357.826270.00216−2033.5OGLE
3351.588620.00156−6792OGLE7642.525550.00110this work
3649.149090.00129−6321OGLE7642.841500.000940.5this work
Eclipse timeErrorEpochEclipse timeErrorEpoch
HJD−2450000± (d)numberSourceHJD−2450000± (d)numberSource
642.261100.000677−11080.5OGLE3784.978210.00112−6106OGLE
753.135510.00117−10905OGLE4025.364070.00132−5725.5OGLE
843.478380.00112−10762OGLE4274.910160.00136−5330.5OGLE
1141.671240.00163−10290OGLE4442.326440.00087−5065.5OGLE
1426.597680.00206−9839OGLE4629.959940.00171−4768.5OGLE
1669.830630.00177−9454OGLE4766.421640.00322−4552.5OGLE
1991.083350.00198−8945.5OGLE5441.142530.00158−3484.5OGLE
2284.855090.00102−8480.5OGLE5528.954190.00238−3345.5OGLE
2475.646410.0012−8178.5OGLE5702.056120.00219−3071.5OGLE
2642.431460.00146−7914.5OGLE5815.143200.00204−2892.5OGLE
2800.373260.00144−7664.5OGLE5877.054090.00173−2794.5OGLE
2959.894760.00171−7412OGLE6029.309320.00235−2553.5OGLE
3192.069290.0019−7044.5OGLE6357.826270.00216−2033.5OGLE
3351.588620.00156−6792OGLE7642.525550.00110this work
3649.149090.00129−6321OGLE7642.841500.000940.5this work
The OC values of all eclipse times were calculated by using equation (1). The OC curve shows an upward parabolic change (dot-dashed line in the upper panel of figure 3), which means the orbital period is continuously increasing. After we removed the long-term continuous increase from the OC curve, a cyclic oscillation in the residuals showed up. Thus, to fit the oscillation to the observations, a cyclic term was added to a quadratic ephemeris. This means a third body may exist, so we considered a different kind of orbit for the third body: eccentric or circular. The results with weight 1 applied to the OGLE data and with weight 10 applied to the 1 m telescope data are shown in figure 3 along with the epoch number E, and both Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC) are shown in table 2. We choose such weighting because the minima from OGLE data are not observed directly, but calculated from long-term data which have only fewer than 10 data points in one period (see, e.g., Zhu et al. 2008; Liao & Qian 2009); we usually choose the weight of higher-precision observations about 10 times larger than lower-precision one. Obviously, the eccentric orbit fits better than the other as it has a lower BIC. Thus, we use the eccentric fitting formula as shown in equation (2) (Irwin 1952). This solution gives us a new ephemeris of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063:
(2)
in which E is the epoch number and β refers to the rate of the linear period increase. In the formula ΔT0 and ΔP0 refer to the revised epoch and period. A = a12sin i3/c refers to the projected semi-major axis given in days, e, ν, and ω refer to the eccentricity, the true anomaly, and the longitude of the periastron from the ascending node for the additional body, respectively, and E* refers to the eccentric anomaly. We get the connection between the eccentric anomaly (E*) and the observed times of light minima from the Kepler equation:
(3)
in which M, T, P3, and t respectively represent the mean anomaly, time of periastron passage, period of the third body, and observed times of light minima. We can determine five parameters (P3, T, A, ω, e) by fitting weighted least-squares to the OC trend. The eccentric anomaly (E*) could expand approximately with Bessel’s series. The values above are shown in table 2. All eclipsing times were obtained over a 19-year period, which is longer than the period of the cyclic period change of 14.80 yr.
O − C diagrams of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 fitted with an eccentric orbit and a circular orbit. The dot-dashed lines are parabolic changes. The solid lines refer to upward parabolic plus cyclic variation in the upper panels, and to the cyclic variation alone in the middle panels.
Fig. 3.

OC diagrams of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 fitted with an eccentric orbit and a circular orbit. The dot-dashed lines are parabolic changes. The solid lines refer to upward parabolic plus cyclic variation in the upper panels, and to the cyclic variation alone in the middle panels.

Table 2.

Orbital parameters of the third body in OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063.

ParametersEccentric orbit caseCircular orbit case
Revised epoch, ΔT0 (d)−0.00284(±0.00092)0.00041(±0.00465)
Revised period, ΔP0 (d)−4.94(±3.45) × 10−71.0(±19.5) × 10−7
Semi-amplitude, A (d)0.00503(±0.00038)0.00527(±0.00174)
Oribital period, P3 (yr)14.80(±0.59)16.14(±2.95)
Rate of the period change of the binary, |$\dot{P}$| (d yr−1)2.27(±3.42) × 10−85.63(±16.70) × 10−8
Longitude of the periastron passage, ω (°)86.9(±12.1)...
Eccentricity, e0.555(±0.150)...
Projected semi-major axis, a12sin i3 (au)0.87(±0.08)0.91(±0.30)
Projected masses, M3sin i3 (M)0.70(±0.02)0.69(±0.03)
|$\chi ^{2}_{\nu }$|1.96(±0.09)3.90(±0.16)
BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion)−54.6−40.9
ParametersEccentric orbit caseCircular orbit case
Revised epoch, ΔT0 (d)−0.00284(±0.00092)0.00041(±0.00465)
Revised period, ΔP0 (d)−4.94(±3.45) × 10−71.0(±19.5) × 10−7
Semi-amplitude, A (d)0.00503(±0.00038)0.00527(±0.00174)
Oribital period, P3 (yr)14.80(±0.59)16.14(±2.95)
Rate of the period change of the binary, |$\dot{P}$| (d yr−1)2.27(±3.42) × 10−85.63(±16.70) × 10−8
Longitude of the periastron passage, ω (°)86.9(±12.1)...
Eccentricity, e0.555(±0.150)...
Projected semi-major axis, a12sin i3 (au)0.87(±0.08)0.91(±0.30)
Projected masses, M3sin i3 (M)0.70(±0.02)0.69(±0.03)
|$\chi ^{2}_{\nu }$|1.96(±0.09)3.90(±0.16)
BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion)−54.6−40.9
Table 2.

Orbital parameters of the third body in OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063.

ParametersEccentric orbit caseCircular orbit case
Revised epoch, ΔT0 (d)−0.00284(±0.00092)0.00041(±0.00465)
Revised period, ΔP0 (d)−4.94(±3.45) × 10−71.0(±19.5) × 10−7
Semi-amplitude, A (d)0.00503(±0.00038)0.00527(±0.00174)
Oribital period, P3 (yr)14.80(±0.59)16.14(±2.95)
Rate of the period change of the binary, |$\dot{P}$| (d yr−1)2.27(±3.42) × 10−85.63(±16.70) × 10−8
Longitude of the periastron passage, ω (°)86.9(±12.1)...
Eccentricity, e0.555(±0.150)...
Projected semi-major axis, a12sin i3 (au)0.87(±0.08)0.91(±0.30)
Projected masses, M3sin i3 (M)0.70(±0.02)0.69(±0.03)
|$\chi ^{2}_{\nu }$|1.96(±0.09)3.90(±0.16)
BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion)−54.6−40.9
ParametersEccentric orbit caseCircular orbit case
Revised epoch, ΔT0 (d)−0.00284(±0.00092)0.00041(±0.00465)
Revised period, ΔP0 (d)−4.94(±3.45) × 10−71.0(±19.5) × 10−7
Semi-amplitude, A (d)0.00503(±0.00038)0.00527(±0.00174)
Oribital period, P3 (yr)14.80(±0.59)16.14(±2.95)
Rate of the period change of the binary, |$\dot{P}$| (d yr−1)2.27(±3.42) × 10−85.63(±16.70) × 10−8
Longitude of the periastron passage, ω (°)86.9(±12.1)...
Eccentricity, e0.555(±0.150)...
Projected semi-major axis, a12sin i3 (au)0.87(±0.08)0.91(±0.30)
Projected masses, M3sin i3 (M)0.70(±0.02)0.69(±0.03)
|$\chi ^{2}_{\nu }$|1.96(±0.09)3.90(±0.16)
BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion)−54.6−40.9

4 Light-curve analysis

The light curves of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 from OGLE and the 1 m telescope were analyzed separately with the software program Wilson and Devinney (2013 version) (Wilson & Devinney 1971; Wilson 1990, 2012; van Hamme & Wilson 2003; Wilson & Wyithe 2003). We derived the VI color index of the OGLE data and the reddening map of Magellanic clouds (Skowron et al. 2021) as VI = −0.221 mag, which means the primary component is a B5 type star. From Cox (2000) we can estimate that the effective temperature of the primary component is T1 = 15200 K. Also, the gravity darkening coefficients were given as 1.0 for both stars (Lucy 1967) and the bolometric albedo as 1.0 for both stars (Ruciński 1969). Bolometric and bandpass square-root limb-darkening parameters are given by van Hamme (1993). Mode 3 (the contact mode) was chosen to approximate the contact configuration. The adjustable parameters include the inclination i, the mean temperature of star 2 T2, the dimensionless potentials ω1 and ω2 of each component, the mass ratio q, and the monochromatic luminosity of the primary component.

We use the q-search method (Zhang & Qian 2013; Zhou & Soonthornthum 2019; Liu et al. 2020; Li et al. 2022a) to determine the mass ratio of the binary and constrain the temperature of the primary star. The result of temperature constraint is shown in figure 4. We get T1 = 14000 with the lowest residual, so this should be close to the true temperature, and we get our final result with this T1. For each q, the calculation starts at mode 3. Different light curves, the OGLE IV and the 1 m telescope data, give the same result that the minimum of the binary is around q = 0.900. The final solution and the observed light curves were plotted in figure 5. Since we found that a period oscillation may exist in OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063, according to the orbital period investigation in section 3, we made l3 an adjustable parameter to add a third light to the calculation. The result of the q-search is shown in figure 6; the value of the parameters are shown in table 3; the morphology of the system is shown in figure 7. In the table, the radii are shown in the form of fractions of the semimajor axis, R1 and R2 refer to the equivalent volume radii, and the fill-out factor f refers to the degree of contact. The degree of contact is f = (Ωin − Ωstar)/(Ωin − Ωout), in which Ωstar refers to the modified dimensionless potential of the star surface, while Ωin and Ωout means the dimensionless potential of the inner and outer Roche lobes, respectively.

Residuals in different temperatures.
Fig. 4.

Residuals in different temperatures.

(a) Theoretical (solid line) and observational (open symbols) light curves obtained from the 1 m telescope (offset for B, V, and R from top to bottom). (b) I band from the OGLE IV. The solid line represents the theoretical light curve. The lower panels are the corresponding residuals. (c) OGLE V-band (blue triangles) compared with the WD result of the 1 m telescope V-band (solid line).
Fig. 5.

(a) Theoretical (solid line) and observational (open symbols) light curves obtained from the 1 m telescope (offset for B, V, and R from top to bottom). (b) I band from the OGLE IV. The solid line represents the theoretical light curve. The lower panels are the corresponding residuals. (c) OGLE V-band (blue triangles) compared with the WD result of the 1 m telescope V-band (solid line).

q-search of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063. The circles represent the residuals of 1 m light curves; the squares represent that of the light curve from OGLE and its values have been subtracted by 0.000415.
Fig. 6.

q-search of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063. The circles represent the residuals of 1 m light curves; the squares represent that of the light curve from OGLE and its values have been subtracted by 0.000415.

Morphology of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063.
Fig. 7.

Morphology of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063.

Table 3.

Photometric solutions for OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063.

ParametersOur light curvesOGLE
|${\rm q}$| (M2/M1)0.900(±0.019)0.902(±0.037)
T1 (K)14000 (fixed)14000 (fixed)
|${\rm i}$| (°)64.66(±0.67)63.9(±1.4)
ΔT (K)459(±57)17(±104)
T2/T10.9672(±0.0041)0.9988(±0.0074)
L1/(L1 + L2) (B)0.539(±0.011)...
L2/(L1 + L2) (B)0.461(±0.011)...
L3/(Ltotal) (B%)1.04(±3.8)...
L1/(L1 + L2) (V)0.537(±0.011)...
L2/(L1 + L2) (V)0.463(±0.011)...
L3/(Ltotal) (V%)0.9(±3.8)...
L1/(L1 + L2) (R)0.536(±0.012)...
L2/(L1 + L2) (R)0.464(±0.012)...
L3/(Ltotal) (R%)0.3(±4.4)...
L1/(L1 + L2) (I)...0.522(±0.024)
L2/(L1 + L2) (I)...0.478(±0.024)
L3/(Ltotal) (I%)...4.1(±8.2)
Ω13.407(±0.024)3.338(±0.043)
Ω23.4073.338
r1 (pole)0.3892(±0.0018)0.4013(±0.0060)
r1 (side)0.4144(±0.0023)0.4302(±0.0082)
r1 (back)0.4596(±0.0037)0.485(±0.016)
r2 (pole)0.3732(±0.0063)0.383(±0.011)
r2 (side)0.3965(±0.0083)0.409(±0.015)
r2 (back)0.4440(±0.0150)0.466(±0.030)
R2/R10.957(±0.014)0.959(±0.028)
Fill out (⁠|${f\%})$|35.9(±4.8)50.1(±8.7)
Residual2.6228e − 047.4704e − 04
ParametersOur light curvesOGLE
|${\rm q}$| (M2/M1)0.900(±0.019)0.902(±0.037)
T1 (K)14000 (fixed)14000 (fixed)
|${\rm i}$| (°)64.66(±0.67)63.9(±1.4)
ΔT (K)459(±57)17(±104)
T2/T10.9672(±0.0041)0.9988(±0.0074)
L1/(L1 + L2) (B)0.539(±0.011)...
L2/(L1 + L2) (B)0.461(±0.011)...
L3/(Ltotal) (B%)1.04(±3.8)...
L1/(L1 + L2) (V)0.537(±0.011)...
L2/(L1 + L2) (V)0.463(±0.011)...
L3/(Ltotal) (V%)0.9(±3.8)...
L1/(L1 + L2) (R)0.536(±0.012)...
L2/(L1 + L2) (R)0.464(±0.012)...
L3/(Ltotal) (R%)0.3(±4.4)...
L1/(L1 + L2) (I)...0.522(±0.024)
L2/(L1 + L2) (I)...0.478(±0.024)
L3/(Ltotal) (I%)...4.1(±8.2)
Ω13.407(±0.024)3.338(±0.043)
Ω23.4073.338
r1 (pole)0.3892(±0.0018)0.4013(±0.0060)
r1 (side)0.4144(±0.0023)0.4302(±0.0082)
r1 (back)0.4596(±0.0037)0.485(±0.016)
r2 (pole)0.3732(±0.0063)0.383(±0.011)
r2 (side)0.3965(±0.0083)0.409(±0.015)
r2 (back)0.4440(±0.0150)0.466(±0.030)
R2/R10.957(±0.014)0.959(±0.028)
Fill out (⁠|${f\%})$|35.9(±4.8)50.1(±8.7)
Residual2.6228e − 047.4704e − 04
Table 3.

Photometric solutions for OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063.

ParametersOur light curvesOGLE
|${\rm q}$| (M2/M1)0.900(±0.019)0.902(±0.037)
T1 (K)14000 (fixed)14000 (fixed)
|${\rm i}$| (°)64.66(±0.67)63.9(±1.4)
ΔT (K)459(±57)17(±104)
T2/T10.9672(±0.0041)0.9988(±0.0074)
L1/(L1 + L2) (B)0.539(±0.011)...
L2/(L1 + L2) (B)0.461(±0.011)...
L3/(Ltotal) (B%)1.04(±3.8)...
L1/(L1 + L2) (V)0.537(±0.011)...
L2/(L1 + L2) (V)0.463(±0.011)...
L3/(Ltotal) (V%)0.9(±3.8)...
L1/(L1 + L2) (R)0.536(±0.012)...
L2/(L1 + L2) (R)0.464(±0.012)...
L3/(Ltotal) (R%)0.3(±4.4)...
L1/(L1 + L2) (I)...0.522(±0.024)
L2/(L1 + L2) (I)...0.478(±0.024)
L3/(Ltotal) (I%)...4.1(±8.2)
Ω13.407(±0.024)3.338(±0.043)
Ω23.4073.338
r1 (pole)0.3892(±0.0018)0.4013(±0.0060)
r1 (side)0.4144(±0.0023)0.4302(±0.0082)
r1 (back)0.4596(±0.0037)0.485(±0.016)
r2 (pole)0.3732(±0.0063)0.383(±0.011)
r2 (side)0.3965(±0.0083)0.409(±0.015)
r2 (back)0.4440(±0.0150)0.466(±0.030)
R2/R10.957(±0.014)0.959(±0.028)
Fill out (⁠|${f\%})$|35.9(±4.8)50.1(±8.7)
Residual2.6228e − 047.4704e − 04
ParametersOur light curvesOGLE
|${\rm q}$| (M2/M1)0.900(±0.019)0.902(±0.037)
T1 (K)14000 (fixed)14000 (fixed)
|${\rm i}$| (°)64.66(±0.67)63.9(±1.4)
ΔT (K)459(±57)17(±104)
T2/T10.9672(±0.0041)0.9988(±0.0074)
L1/(L1 + L2) (B)0.539(±0.011)...
L2/(L1 + L2) (B)0.461(±0.011)...
L3/(Ltotal) (B%)1.04(±3.8)...
L1/(L1 + L2) (V)0.537(±0.011)...
L2/(L1 + L2) (V)0.463(±0.011)...
L3/(Ltotal) (V%)0.9(±3.8)...
L1/(L1 + L2) (R)0.536(±0.012)...
L2/(L1 + L2) (R)0.464(±0.012)...
L3/(Ltotal) (R%)0.3(±4.4)...
L1/(L1 + L2) (I)...0.522(±0.024)
L2/(L1 + L2) (I)...0.478(±0.024)
L3/(Ltotal) (I%)...4.1(±8.2)
Ω13.407(±0.024)3.338(±0.043)
Ω23.4073.338
r1 (pole)0.3892(±0.0018)0.4013(±0.0060)
r1 (side)0.4144(±0.0023)0.4302(±0.0082)
r1 (back)0.4596(±0.0037)0.485(±0.016)
r2 (pole)0.3732(±0.0063)0.383(±0.011)
r2 (side)0.3965(±0.0083)0.409(±0.015)
r2 (back)0.4440(±0.0150)0.466(±0.030)
R2/R10.957(±0.014)0.959(±0.028)
Fill out (⁠|${f\%})$|35.9(±4.8)50.1(±8.7)
Residual2.6228e − 047.4704e − 04

5 Results and discussion

We cannot determine the absolute parameters of the system directly since no spectroscopic elements have been published. We can estimate the primary mass to be 5.23 M corresponding to its effective temperature assuming that it is a normal main-sequence star (Cox 2000). Since the mass ratio is 0.900, we can derive that the mass secondary component is 4.71 M.

We get a more precise period from the new ephemeris which was derived from the OC residuals with all available minimum times. The long-term continuous increase of the period can be interpreted by the mass transfer from the less massive component to the other. We calculated the mass transfer rate as |${\dot{M}} = 5.67\times {10^{-7}}\, M_{\odot }\:\mbox{yr}^{-1}$| using the well-known equation 
(4)
Incidentally, in the circular orbit case |${\dot{M}} =1.41\times {10^{-6}}\, M_{\odot }\:\mbox{yr}^{-1}$|⁠, about two times larger. Compared to LY Aur (Zhao et al. 2014), V382 Cyg, and TU Mus (Qian et al. 2007a), we believe this system is undergoing case A mass transfer which continues for a short time during the binary evolution and will at last break the contact configuration (Sybesma 1985, 1986). The evolution state of this system is similar to BH Cen (Zhao et al. 2018b). The more-massive component evolves into filling out its Roche lobe first and transferring mass to the less-massive one. During this process, the system’s mass ratio gets higher while the distance between two components and the period gets shorter. The system will become a contact binary as time goes by, and the mass transfer will not stop even when the original more-massive component becomes less massive. After this state, the system’s period and the distance between the two components will start to increase, and that is the current state of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063. There are similar examples in the Milky Way, like V593 Cen (Er-gang et al. 2019), and in the Andromeda galaxy (see, e.g., Li et al. 2022b), and their evolution may also come from detached to semi-detached and further to contact eventually, due to mass transfer. In the future, the contact configuration will be disrupted due to continuous mass transfer. Though OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 is in a low-metallicity environment, its evolution seems to show no difference from binaries in the Milky Way. One thing that must be mentioned is that though we derived the mass transfer rate from the period change, this is not a |$100\%$| precise result. As seen in King and Lasota (2021), such a period change on small time scales may be caused by variations in the flow or temporary digressions from synchronicity. As long as 1000 years is needed for a reliable result; this interpretation will have to wait for a long time before being confirmed or overthrown.
The result also shows the orbital period of the system has a periodic oscillation with an amplitude of 0.00503 d and a period P = 14.80 yr. The oscillating characteristic of the OC residuals may be the result of the light-time effect due to an additional body or might result from magnetic activity cycles in the two components. Although magnetic activity cycle mechanism is usually proposed to explain the solar-type binary cyclic period change (Applegate 1992; Lanza et al. 1998), it is not fit for early-type binaries which presumably contain a convective core and a radiative envelope. The WD fitting result also shows that the OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 is an overcontact binary with a fill-out factor of about |$35.9\%$|⁠, which shows that this system is an overcontact binary. According to Pribulla and Rucinski (2006) and D’Angelo, van Kerkwijk, and Rucinski (2006), most overcontact binaries exist in multiple systems. By transferring angular momentum during the Kozai oscillation (Kozai 1962), the additional bodies may play an important role in the formation of overcontact binaries. Thus the light-time effect can be used to explain the periodic change (Borkovits & Hegedues 1996; Chambliss 1992). We can derive the mass function of the third body f(m) = 0.003 M using the equation
(5)
where a12 is the distance between the close pair and the center of mass with respect to the third body. Then we can estimate the minimum mass of the third body to be M3 = 0.70M and the corresponding orbital radius to be less than 13.22 au. Also, from the result of the light curve analysis that the proportion of the l3 is less than |$5\%$|⁠, especially that of the 1 m telescope observation is less than |$1\%$|⁠, the third body would likely be a low-mass late-type star. However, due to the dense star field (as shown in figure 8) where OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 is in, this result might be caused by light pollution from nearby stars. More accurate observations are needed to make out the truth. Many other massive binaries were also found the existence of a third body, like V701 Sco (Qian et al. 2006a), V382 Cyg, and TU Mus (Qian et al. 2007a). This phenomenon also exists widely in the group of late-type binaries like AS Ser (Zhu et al. 2008), AH Cnc (Qian et al. 2006b), and AD Cnc (Qian et al. 2007b). The research of OGLE-SMC-ECL-2063 provides the basis for us to study the formation and evolution of early-type contact binaries.
Observation field of OGLE.
Fig. 8.

Observation field of OGLE.

Acknowledgements

This work is partly supported by the Chinese Natural Science Foundation (Nos. 11933008, 11873017, 11903076) and the basic research project of Yunnan Province (Grant Nos. 202201AT070092, 202001AT070051). This study is based on data collected with the South Africa 1 m telescope at the South African Astronomical Observatory. This paper makes use of online data 〈https://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/J/AcA/66/421〉 provided by Pawlak et al., and the authors thank Pawlak et al. for providing an opportunity to study the evolution of massive binaries in the SMC. We would like to thank the OGLE team for making all of their databases easily publicly available.

References

Applegate
 
J. H.
 
1992
,
ApJ
,
385
,
621

Bell
 
S. A.
,
Malcolm
 
G. J.
 
1987
,
MNRAS
,
226
,
899

Borkovits
 
T.
,
Hegedues
 
T.
 
1996
,
A&AS
,
120
,
63

Chambliss
 
C. R.
 
1992
,
PASP
,
104
,
663

Cox
 
A. N.
ed.
2000
,
Allen’s Astrophysical Quantities
, 4th ed. (
New York
:
Springer
)

D’Angelo
 
C.
,
van Kerkwijk
 
M. H.
,
Rucinski
 
S. M.
 
2006
,
AJ
,
132
,
650

Er-gang
 
Z.
,
Sheng-bang
 
Q.
,
Soonthornthum
 
B.
,
Poshyachinda
 
S.
,
Xiao
 
Z.
,
Sarotsakulchai
 
T.
,
Jia
 
Z.
,
Wen-ping
 
L.
 
2019
,
ApJ
,
871
,
L10

Irwin
 
J. B.
 
1952
,
ApJ
,
116
,
211

King
 
A.
,
Lasota
 
J.-P.
 
2021
,
arXiv:2112.03779

Kozai
 
Y.
 
1962
,
AJ
,
67
,
591

Lanza
 
A. F.
,
Rodono
 
M.
,
Rosner
 
R.
 
1998
,
MNRAS
,
296
,
893

Lapasset
 
E.
,
Claria
 
J. J.
,
Gomez
 
M.
 
1988
,
IBVS
,
3161
,
1

Li
 
F.-X.
,
Qian
 
S.-B.
,
Fernández Lajús
 
E.
,
Liu
 
L.
,
Zhao
 
E.-G.
 
2022a
,
PASJ
,
74
,
533

Li
 
F.-X.
,
Qian
 
S.-B.
,
Jiao
 
C.-L.
,
Ma
 
W.-W.
 
2022b
,
ApJ
,
932
,
14

Li
 
F.-X.
,
Qian
 
S.-B.
,
Zhang
 
J.
,
Zhu
 
L.-Y.
,
Zhao
 
E.-G.
,
Liao
 
W.-P.
 
2022c
,
MNRAS
,
514
,
1206

Liao
 
W.-P.
,
Qian
 
S.-B.
 
2009
,
PASJ
,
61
,
777

Lipari
 
S. L.
,
Sistero
 
R. F.
 
1985
,
Ap&SS
,
109
,
271

Liu
 
N.-P.
,
Sarotsakulchai
 
T.
,
Rattanasoon
 
S.
,
Zhang
 
B.
 
2020
,
PASJ
,
72
,
73

Lucy
 
L. B.
 
1967
,
Z. Astrophys.
,
65
,
89

Pawlak
 
M.
 et al.  
2016
,
Acta Astron.
,
66
,
421

Pribulla
 
T.
,
Rucinski
 
S. M.
 
2006
,
AJ
,
131
,
2986

Qian
 
S. B.
,
Liu
 
L.
,
Kreiner
 
J. M.
 
2006a
,
New Astron.
,
12
,
117

Qian
 
S. B.
,
Liu
 
L.
,
Soonthornthum
 
B.
,
Zhu
 
L. Y.
,
He
 
J. J.
 
2006b
,
AJ
,
131
,
3028

Qian
 
S. B.
,
Yuan
 
J. Z.
,
Liu
 
L.
,
He
 
J. J.
,
Fernández Lajús
 
E.
,
Kreiner
 
J. Z.
 
2007a
,
MNRAS
,
380
,
1599

Qian
 
S. B.
,
Yuan
 
J. Z.
,
Soonthornthum
 
B.
,
Zhu
 
L. Y.
,
He
 
J. J.
,
Yang
 
Y. G.
 
2007b
,
ApJ
,
671
,
811

Ruciński
 
S. M.
 
1969
,
Acta Astron.
,
19
,
245

Sana
 
H.
 et al.  
2012
,
Science
,
337
,
444

Skowron
 
D. M.
 et al.  
2021
,
ApJS
,
252
,
23

Sybesma
 
C. H. B.
 
1985
,
A&A
,
142
,
171

Sybesma
 
C. H. B.
 
1986
,
A&A
,
159
,
108

Udalski
 
A.
,
Soszynski
 
I.
,
Szymanski
 
M.
,
Kubiak
 
M.
,
Pietrzynski
 
G.
,
Wozniak
 
P.
,
Zebrun
 
K.
 
1998
,
Acta Astron.
,
48
,
563

van Hamme
 
W.
 
1993
,
AJ
,
106
,
2096

van Hamme
 
W.
,
Wilson
 
R. E.
 
2003
, in
ASP Conf. Ser., 298, GAIA Spectroscopy: Science and Technology
, ed.
Munari
 
U.
(
San Francisco
:
ASP
),
323

Wilson
 
R. E.
 
1990
,
ApJ
,
356
,
613

Wilson
 
R. E.
 
2012
,
AJ
,
144
,
73

Wilson
 
R. E.
,
Devinney
 
E. J.
 
1971
,
ApJ
,
166
,
605

Wilson
 
R. E.
,
Wyithe
 
S. B.
 
2003
, in
ASP Conf. Ser., 298, GAIA Spectroscopy: Science and Technology
, ed.
Munari
 
U.
(
San Francisco
:
ASP
),
313

Wyrzykowski
 
L.
 et al.  
2004
,
Acta Astron.
,
54
,
1

Zhang
 
J.
,
Qian
 
S. B.
 
2013
,
AJ
,
145
,
156

Zhao
 
E.
,
Qian
 
S.
,
Li
 
L.
,
Fernández-Lajús
 
E.
,
Zhang
 
J.
,
Shi
 
X.
 
2018a
,
PASP
,
130
,
084205

Zhao
 
E.
,
Qian
 
S.
,
Li
 
L.
,
He
 
J.
,
Liu
 
L.
,
Wang
 
J.
,
Zhang
 
J.
 
2014
,
New Astron.
,
26
,
112

Zhao
 
E.-G.
,
Qian
 
S.-B.
,
Zejda
 
M.
,
Zhang
 
B.
,
Zhang
 
J.
 
2018b
,
Res. Astron. Astrophys.
,
18
,
059

Zhou
 
X.
,
Soonthornthum
 
B.
 
2019
,
PASJ
,
71
,
39

Zhu
 
L.-Y.
,
Qian
 
S.-B.
,
Yang
 
Y.-G.
 
2008
,
AJ
,
136
,
337

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.