Abstract

Microquasar SS 433 located at the geometric center of radio nebula W 50 is a suitable source for investigating the physical process of how galactic jets affect the surrounding interstellar medium (ISM). Previous studies have searched for evidence of the interaction between the SS 433 jet and ISM, such as neutral hydrogen gas and molecular clouds; however, it is still unclear which ISM interacts with the jet. We looked for new molecular clouds that possibly interact at the terminal of the SS 433 eastern jet using the Nobeyama 45 m telescope and the Atacama Submillimeter Telescope Experiment (ASTE). We identified two molecular clouds, comprising many small clumps, in the velocity range of 30.1–36.5 km s−1 for the first time. These clouds have complex velocity structures, and one of them has a density gradient toward SS 433. Although it is difficult to conclude the relation between the molecular clouds and the SS 433/W 50 system, there is a possibility that the eastern structure of W 50 constructed by the SS 433 jet swept up tiny molecular clumps drifting in the surroundings and formed the molecular clouds that we identified in this study.

1 Introduction

Galactic X-ray binary (GXB) jets inject matter and energy into their surroundings and thus change the physical and chemical states of the interstellar medium (ISM). The study of the interaction between the jets and surrounding ISM is thus essential to understanding the evolution of our galaxy. One of the essential contributions of the jets is the formation of molecular clouds. Asahina et al. (2014, 2017) carried out a magnetohydrodynamical simulation to investigate the effect of jets on surrounding neutral hydrogen (H i). In their simulation, jets compressed gas and triggered a cooling instability, and ultimately the jets formed molecular clouds after ∼106 yr. Other studies suggested that GXB jets drive interstellar turbulence, produce high-energy cosmic rays, and sometimes stimulate star formation (Heinz et al. 2008; Mirabel et al. 2015; Cooper et al. 2020). Recent observational studies confirmed the interaction between galactic microquasar jets and the surrounding ISM. Tetarenko et al. (2018) studied molecular clouds located on the jet axis of GRS 1915+105 using observation datasets of the Atacama Large Millimeter/sub-millimeter Array (ALMA) and found that the jet drives a shock at the impact site of the molecular cloud. Additionally, Tetarenko et al. (2020) observed density and temperature tracers from molecular clouds around GRS 1758−258 and 1E 1740.7−2942 and investigated the jet feedback to the surroundings. Nevertheless, there still have been few observations of the interaction between jets and the ISM. It is thus important to increase the number of sample observations to clarify what happens in the region of interaction between jets and the ISM.

The system of the microquasar SS 433 and surrounding radio nebula W 50 is a suitable target for investigating the effects of GXB jets on their surroundings. W 50 is a large radio nebula located at |$(\alpha _{\rm J2000.0},\ \delta _{\rm J2000.0}) = ({19^{\rm h}12^{\rm m}19{_{.}^{\rm s}}92},\ +{4^{\circ}55^{\prime }01{^{\prime \prime }_{.}}2})$| (figure 1). It extends over an area of 2° × 1° in the sky (Geldzahler et al. 1980). The microquasar SS 433 is located at the geometric center of W 50. SS 433 ejects precessing jets in the east–west direction with a jet velocity of 0.26c, an opening angle of 20° and a precession period of 162 d (Abell & Margon 1979; Hjellming & Johnston 1981; Margon 1984; Margon & Anderson 1989; Davydov et al. 2008). The elongated structures of W 50, called “ears,” are believed to be the result of an interaction between the jets and the nebula (Downes et al. 1981a, 1981b, 1986; Dubner et al. 1998). The western side of W 50 is near the Galactic plane, and the length of the western ear along the jet axis is shorter than that of the eastern ear (19 versus 82 pc assuming a distance of 5.5 kpc). The distance of the SS 433/W 50 system is still under discussion but is believed to be in the range of 3.0 to 5.5 kpc.

Radio continuum image of W 50 taken with the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (JVLA) at 1.602 GHz (Sakemi et al. 2021). Yellow contours show the positions of the newly identified molecular clouds in the velocity range 30.1–42.3 km s−1. The contour levels are the rms × [4, 8]. The yellow circle and magenta ellipse in the bottom left-hand corner show the beam sizes of the CO emission and continuum, respectively. Purple and hot pink ellipses show the positions of the molecular clouds identified by previous studies in the velocity range of 49–56 km s−1 and 73–77 km s−1, respectively. Note that the clouds S1–S6 and G40.331–4.302 are outside the field of view.
Fig. 1.

Radio continuum image of W 50 taken with the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (JVLA) at 1.602 GHz (Sakemi et al. 2021). Yellow contours show the positions of the newly identified molecular clouds in the velocity range 30.1–42.3 km s−1. The contour levels are the rms × [4, 8]. The yellow circle and magenta ellipse in the bottom left-hand corner show the beam sizes of the CO emission and continuum, respectively. Purple and hot pink ellipses show the positions of the molecular clouds identified by previous studies in the velocity range of 49–56 km s−1 and 73–77 km s−1, respectively. Note that the clouds S1–S6 and G40.331–4.302 are outside the field of view.

Many studies of the ISM around SS 433/W 50 have tried to find the evidence of the jet–ISM interaction and determine the kinematic distance of the system. The first observation of H i gas was reported by Dubner et al. (1998) with the Green Bank Telescope. They identified an H i cavity at the position of W 50 for a velocity of vLSR = 42 km s−1. Additionally, a large H i clump was detected at the southeast of the eastern ear, and it has been suggested that this H i clump collided with the eastern ear and changed the morphology. A distance to the SS 433/W 50 system of 3.0 kpc was determined from these results. Sakemi et al. (2021) compared the spatial distributions of W 50 and the surrounding H i using GALFA-HI survey datasets taken with the 305 m Arecibo Radio Telescope (Peek et al. 2011) and confirmed that the H i cavity identified by Dubner et al. (1998) has a clear spatial correlation with W 50 in the velocity range from 33 to 55 km s−1. Meanwhile, Lockman et al. (2007) observed the absorption line of H i in the direction of SS 433 and concluded that the H i cloud at a velocity of 75 km s−1 is related to the SS 433/W 50 system. The velocity is clearly different from that suggested by Dubner et al. (1998), and the kinematic distance is 5.5 kpc. The distance is consistent with the value derived by comparing a deep-integrated radio image of the SS 433 jet with the kinematic jet model based on the speed and the precession period of the jet (Blundell & Bowler 2004).

Not only H i gas but also molecular clouds have been identified around the SS 433/W 50 system. We summarize the previous studies in table 1 and show the positions of the clouds in figure 1. Yamamoto et al. (2008) suggested that the molecular clouds in the velocity range from 42 to 56 km s−1 are related to the SS 433 jet, which is distributed around the jet axis (S1–S6, N1–N4). The eastern and western clouds of SS 433 are in the velocity ranges of 42 to 45 km s−1 and 49 to 56 km s−1, respectively. These velocities correspond to kinematic distances of 3.0 and 3.5 kpc for the flat rotation curve (Brand & Blitz 1993). The eastern clouds (S1–S6) are distributed in a region far from the eastern edge of W 50; i.e., at approximately 0|${_{.}^{\circ}}$|4–1|${_{.}^{\circ}}$|6 (outside area of figure 1). The western-side clouds (N1–N4) are closer to SS 433, and Liu et al. (2020) observed N1, N2, and N3 with higher spatial resolution and concluded that a part of them is located within W 50. Recently, Yamamoto et al. (2022) reported the observation of N4. The molecular cloud has an asymmetric spectrum for CO emission and an extreme temperature gradient. They thus suggested that the cloud is interacting with the SS 433 jet. Meanwhile, Su et al. (2018) found molecular clouds in another velocity range of 73–84 km s−1, which are located near the western ear (G39.315−1.155) and a straight extension of the eastern ear about 0.9° (G40.331−4.302, outside area of figure 1). They suggested that the molecular clouds are located at a distance of 4.9 kpc and interacted with W 50 approximately 105 years ago. The molecular clouds identified in these previous studies have good spatial correlation with the SS 433/W 50 system, and some have spectral features (e.g., spectral broadening and wings) suggesting interaction with the jet. It remains unclear at which velocities and distances the association is real, and there is no consensus in explaining this situation.

Table 1.

The molecular clouds around the SS 433/W 50 system identified by previous studies.*

VLSRDistance
Name(km s−1)(kpc)References
S142.93.01
S245.43.01
S344.13.01
S443.23.01
S544.83.01
S642.13.01
N155.83.51, 2, 3
N253.73.51, 2, 3
N353.03.51, 2, 3
N449.43.51, 3
G39.315−1.155734.94
G40.331−4.302744.94
VLSRDistance
Name(km s−1)(kpc)References
S142.93.01
S245.43.01
S344.13.01
S443.23.01
S544.83.01
S642.13.01
N155.83.51, 2, 3
N253.73.51, 2, 3
N353.03.51, 2, 3
N449.43.51, 3
G39.315−1.155734.94
G40.331−4.302744.94
*

Column 1: Name of each molecular cloud. Column 2: Peak velocity. Column 3: Kinematic distance referred to in each paper. Note that the values of N1 to N4 refer to reference 1. Column 4: References—(1) Yamamoto et al. (2008), (2) Liu et al. (2020), (3) Yamamoto et al. (2022), (4) Su et al. (2018).

Table 1.

The molecular clouds around the SS 433/W 50 system identified by previous studies.*

VLSRDistance
Name(km s−1)(kpc)References
S142.93.01
S245.43.01
S344.13.01
S443.23.01
S544.83.01
S642.13.01
N155.83.51, 2, 3
N253.73.51, 2, 3
N353.03.51, 2, 3
N449.43.51, 3
G39.315−1.155734.94
G40.331−4.302744.94
VLSRDistance
Name(km s−1)(kpc)References
S142.93.01
S245.43.01
S344.13.01
S443.23.01
S544.83.01
S642.13.01
N155.83.51, 2, 3
N253.73.51, 2, 3
N353.03.51, 2, 3
N449.43.51, 3
G39.315−1.155734.94
G40.331−4.302744.94
*

Column 1: Name of each molecular cloud. Column 2: Peak velocity. Column 3: Kinematic distance referred to in each paper. Note that the values of N1 to N4 refer to reference 1. Column 4: References—(1) Yamamoto et al. (2008), (2) Liu et al. (2020), (3) Yamamoto et al. (2022), (4) Su et al. (2018).

In the present paper, we focus on the eastern edge of W 50. Since there is a terminal region of the SS 433 jet, it is a suitable target to investigate the jet–ISM interaction. We made observations with the Nobeyama 45 m telescope for 12CO(J = 1–0) and 13CO(J = 1–0) and with the Atacama Submillimeter Telescope Experiment (ASTE) for 12CO(J = 3–2) to identify molecular clouds for the first time. We investigate the features of the molecular clouds that we identified and provide the fundamental physical parameters based on the observed CO line emissions, such as density and temperature. The remainder of the paper is structured as follows. Section 2 describes the observations and the data reduction. Section 3 presents the observational results. Section 4 presents a discussion of the results. Section 5 provides our conclusions.

2 Observations

2.1 12CO(J = 1–0) and 13CO(J = 1–0)

The 12CO(J = 1–0) and 13CO(J = 1–0) data were obtained with the 45 m telescope of the Nobeyama Radio Observatory. We scanned an area of 30.1 × 32.6 arcmin2 in on-the-fly mapping mode (Sawada et al. 2008). We scanned in the right ascension and declination directions to suppress the scanning effect. The four-beam receiver FOREST (Minamidani et al. 2016) and the autocorrelation spectrometer SAM45 (Kuno et al. 2011) were used. Typical noise temperatures of the system including the atmosphere were between 300 and 400 K at 115 GHz. The bandwidth and resolution were 62.5 MHz and 30.52 kHz, respectively. The pointing accuracy was checked every two hours by observing R Aquilae |$(\alpha _{\rm J2000.0},\ \delta _{\rm J2000.0}) = ({19^{\rm h}06^{\rm m}22{_{.}^{\rm s}}25},\ +{8^{\circ}13^{\prime }48{^{\prime \prime }_{.}}0})$| with the front-end H40 and confirmed to be better than 3″. All observations were conducted in equatorial coordinates. We used a chopper wheel to obtain the antenna temperature |$T^{*}_{\rm a}$| (Kutner & Ulich 1981). We observed W51 as a standard source to fix gain variations between the eight output signals on 2019 December 6 to 20, 2020 February 7 to March 6, and 2020 December 1 to 4. The spectral intensity was calibrated and converted to the TMB scale by applying a main beam efficiency ηMB corresponding to each polarization, frequency, and observing season provided by the observatory. The final angular resolutions were |${20{_{.}^{\prime\prime}}3}$| and |${20{_{.}^{\prime\prime}}5}$| The root-mean-square (rms) noise level in TMB was 0.60 and 0.26 K at 115 and 110 GHz, respectively.

2.2 12CO(J = 3–2)

The 12CO(J = 3–2) data were obtained with the ASTE on 2019 August 9 to 11 (Ezawa et al. 2004). We adopted the on-the-fly mode, and the mapping area had dimensions of 11 × 11 arcmin2 centered at |$(\alpha _{\rm J2000.0},\ \delta _{\rm J2000.0}) = ({19^{\rm h}16^{\rm m}47{_{.}^{\rm s}}5243},\ +{4^{\circ}51^{\prime }31{^{\prime \prime }_{.}}709})$|⁠. The front-end was a 2SB SIS mixer receiver called DASH 345. The typical system temperature was 263 K in the single side band. We used WHSF as the back-end in F-FX mode. The band width and resolution were 64 MHz and 31.25 kHz, respectively. The pointing accuracy was checked every three–four hours by observing R Aquilae. We convolved the intensity scale into TMB by assuming the W44 peak to be TMB = 35.5 K (Wang et al. 1994). The final angular resolution, grid size, and velocity resolution were |${28{_{.}^{\prime\prime}}2}$|⁠, 11″, and 0.2 km s−1, respectively. The rms noise level was 0.09 K at 345 GHz.

3 Results

We report the molecular cloud distribution observed with the Nobeyama 45 m telescope and ASTE at the eastern edge region of W 50. Additionally, we explain the velocity features and the line-intensity ratios of the clouds.

3.1 Spatial distributions

We show the distribution of the 12CO(J = 1–0) line emission in the velocity range of 30.1–42.3 km s−1 observed with the Nobeyama 45 m telescope in figure 1 with yellow contours. They distribute around a bright filamentary structure of W 50 at |$\alpha _{\rm J2000.0} = {19^{\rm h}16^{\rm m}00{_{.}^{\rm s}}0}$|⁠. In this region, we found a pointed structure to the north in the radio continuum image, called the chimney (see figure 1, Dubner et al. 1998; Farnes et al. 2017; Broderick et al. 2018). We identified a molecular cloud near the chimney. Additionally, there was another cloud of similar size at the eastern edge of the ear. Figure 2 is a magnified view of the target region. The color is the integrated intensity of 12CO(J = 1–0) in the velocity range 30.1–42.3 km s−1. These velocities correspond well to those of H i gas, suggesting a relation with W 50 (Dubner et al. 1998; Sakemi et al. 2021). We refer to the newly identified prominent clouds as the chimney cloud and edge cloud. Besides these, faint and clumpy clouds are distributed around the filamentary structure.

Velocity-integrated intensity maps of 12CO(J = 1–0). The velocity range is 30.1–42.3 km s−1. Magenta contours show the radio continuum observed with the JVLA at 1.602 GHz. The contour levels are the rms × [2, 4, 8, 16]. The beam sizes of CO emission and continuum observations are shown in the bottom left-hand corner of each panel by a black circle and magenta ellipse, respectively.
Fig. 2.

Velocity-integrated intensity maps of 12CO(J = 1–0). The velocity range is 30.1–42.3 km s−1. Magenta contours show the radio continuum observed with the JVLA at 1.602 GHz. The contour levels are the rms × [2, 4, 8, 16]. The beam sizes of CO emission and continuum observations are shown in the bottom left-hand corner of each panel by a black circle and magenta ellipse, respectively.

Hereafter, we focus on the chimney and edge clouds. Panel (a) of figure 3 is a velocity-integrated intensity map of 12CO(J = 1–0) in the velocity range 30.1–36.5 km s−1. The chimney cloud has two peaks in the southern and northern parts. The edge cloud is patchy, and it is brightest in the north-west region. Panel (b) of figure 3 is a velocity-integrated intensity map of 13CO(J = 1–0) in the same velocity range. The intensity distribution traces the high-density regions of observed molecular clouds. Although the distribution is similar to that of 12CO(J = 1–0), the integrated intensity map of 13CO(J = 1–0) shows structures that are more clumpy. We thus expect that both the chimney and edge clouds comprise many separated clumps. Panel (c) of figure 3 is a velocity-integrated intensity map of 12CO(J = 3–2). Note that we only observed the edge cloud. We detected a difference from the trend in 12CO(J = 1–0) in that the intensity was higher westward rather than eastward in the edge cloud. This cloud thus has different physical properties on eastern and western sides.

Velocity-integrated intensity maps of 12CO(J = 1–0) (left), 13CO(J = 1–0) (middle), and 12CO(J = 3–2) emissions (right). The velocity range is 30.1–36.5 km s−1. Magenta contours show the radio continuum observed with the JVLA at 1.602 GHz. The beam sizes of CO emission and continuum observations are shown in the bottom left-hand corner of each panel by a white circle and magenta ellipse, respectively. The numbers in the middle panel show the position where the physical parameters are derived in section 4. See tables 2 and 3 and figure 10.
Fig. 3.

Velocity-integrated intensity maps of 12CO(J = 1–0) (left), 13CO(J = 1–0) (middle), and 12CO(J = 3–2) emissions (right). The velocity range is 30.1–36.5 km s−1. Magenta contours show the radio continuum observed with the JVLA at 1.602 GHz. The beam sizes of CO emission and continuum observations are shown in the bottom left-hand corner of each panel by a white circle and magenta ellipse, respectively. The numbers in the middle panel show the position where the physical parameters are derived in section 4. See tables 2 and 3 and figure 10.

We derived the peak TMB distribution in 12CO(J = 1–0) (figure 4). The northern part of the chimney cloud has a flat temperature distribution. Similar to the distribution of the velocity-integrated intensity, there is a temperature peak at the southern part. In the case of the edge cloud, the temperature peak is located eastward of the northern part. This position does not correspond to the peak area of the velocity-integrated intensity.

Peak TMB distribution in 12CO(J = 1–0). The velocity range is 30.1–36.5 km s−1. Cyan contours show the radio continuum observed with the JVLA at 1.602 GHz. The beam sizes of CO emission and continuum observations are shown in the bottom left-hand corner of each panel by a white circle and cyan ellipse, respectively.
Fig. 4.

Peak TMB distribution in 12CO(J = 1–0). The velocity range is 30.1–36.5 km s−1. Cyan contours show the radio continuum observed with the JVLA at 1.602 GHz. The beam sizes of CO emission and continuum observations are shown in the bottom left-hand corner of each panel by a white circle and cyan ellipse, respectively.

3.2 Velocity structures

We next explain the velocity structures of the molecular clouds in the eastern region of W 50. Figure 5 is a position–velocity diagram of the chimney cloud. Note that we inclined the boxes to align the integration axis with the direction of the SS 433 jet axis and thus assess the effect of the jet activity. We divided the chimney cloud into eight regions and investigated the velocity structures in the north-east-to-south-west direction. The most outstanding feature is seen in region 4, where the chimney cloud seems to touch the chimney of W 50. In this region, there is a curved structure to the position–velocity diagram. The center velocity seems to shift approximately 1 km s−1 along the curve. A similar trend is seen for the edge cloud (figure 6). We divided the edge cloud into seven regions. The curved structures are in regions 4 and 5. Especially in region 5, the curved structure is above an offset of 0″, where the edge cloud also touches the eastern edge of W 50 in the sky plane. Additionally, the velocity width is thick (∼4 km s−1) at an offset less than 0″ in region 5.

Position–velocity diagrams of the 12CO(J = 1–0) emission of the chimney cloud. The intensity is integrated along the short axes of each square.
Fig. 5.

Position–velocity diagrams of the 12CO(J = 1–0) emission of the chimney cloud. The intensity is integrated along the short axes of each square.

Similar to figure 5 but for the edge cloud.
Fig. 6.

Similar to figure 5 but for the edge cloud.

Figure 7 presents spectra for different parts of the chimney cloud. At the northern peak, the spectrum tends to have a wide velocity width and seems to have a spectral wing toward lower velocity. Between the northern and southern peaks, spectral wings form toward higher velocity. Spectral wings often imply the existence of an external force generated by surrounding sources. However, these wings may originate from multiple clouds in the line of sight and at slightly different velocities. Figure 8 presents spectral plots of the edge cloud. At the peak positions in the north-west region, we clearly see a wide spectrum not only for 12CO(J = 1–0) but also for 13CO(J = 1–0) with a mean velocity width of 4.26 km s−1, which is a result similar to that in figure 6. In the north-east region of the edge cloud, spectral wings form toward high velocity.

(Left) Integrated intensity map of the 12CO(J = 1–0) emission of the chimney cloud. The velocity range is 30.1–36.5 km s−1. (Right) 12CO(J = 1–0) (black) and three times 13CO(J = 1–0) (red) spectra for the regions shown in the grids in the left-hand panel.
Fig. 7.

(Left) Integrated intensity map of the 12CO(J = 1–0) emission of the chimney cloud. The velocity range is 30.1–36.5 km s−1. (Right) 12CO(J = 1–0) (black) and three times 13CO(J = 1–0) (red) spectra for the regions shown in the grids in the left-hand panel.

Similar to figure 7 but for the edge cloud.
Fig. 8.

Similar to figure 7 but for the edge cloud.

3.3 Intensity ratios

Panel (a) of figure 9 shows the intensity ratio of 13CO(J = 1–0)|$/$|12CO(J = 1–0), which traces high-density areas of molecular clouds. Most parts of the chimney and edge clouds have values below 0.3. In the edge cloud, we see again the patchy structure, and we analyze the physical properties of each clump in section 4. Panel (b) of figure 9 shows the intensity ratio of 12CO(J = 3–2)|$/$|12CO(J = 1–0) of the edge cloud. There is a gradient from west to east, which suggests a difference in temperature and/or density in the western and eastern parts.

Intensity ratios of 13CO(J = 1–0) and 12CO(J = 1–0) (a) and 12CO(J = 3–2) and 12CO(J = 1–0) (b). Only the regions where the intensities of the CO emission are higher than three times the rms value are plotted. Black contours show the values of [0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25]. Magenta contours show the radio continuum observed with the JVLA at 1.602 GHz. The resolutions of intensity ratio maps and continuum are given at the bottom left-hand corner of each panel by a black circle and a magenta ellipse, respectively.
Fig. 9.

Intensity ratios of 13CO(J = 1–0) and 12CO(J = 1–0) (a) and 12CO(J = 3–2) and 12CO(J = 1–0) (b). Only the regions where the intensities of the CO emission are higher than three times the rms value are plotted. Black contours show the values of [0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25]. Magenta contours show the radio continuum observed with the JVLA at 1.602 GHz. The resolutions of intensity ratio maps and continuum are given at the bottom left-hand corner of each panel by a black circle and a magenta ellipse, respectively.

4 Discussion

In this section, we consider the relation between the molecular clouds that we identified and their surroundings. We first derive the physical parameters of the chimney and edge clouds. We then consider the interaction between these clouds and the SS 433/W 50 system. We also mention the relation between these clouds and a giant molecular filament in front of the SS 433/W 50 system. We finally discuss the high-velocity clouds in terms of the relation with the clouds identified by Su et al. (2018).

4.1 Physical properties of the molecular clouds

We first estimated the column densities of each region shown in panel (b) of figure 3 adopting two methods; i.e., assuming the X-factor and local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE). The X-factor converts the 12CO(J = 1–0) integrated intensity W[12CO(J = 1–0)] to the column density N(H2), and we adopt the value of N(H2)/W[12CO(J = 1–0)] = 2 × 1020 cm−2 (K km s−1)−1 with |$\, \pm \, 30\%$| uncertainty (Bolatto et al. 2013). Alternatively, we used the following procedures to derive the column density N(H2) by assuming LTE (Wilson et al. 2009). Assuming the 12CO(J = 1–0) line is optically thick, the excitation temperature Tex is derived from the 12CO peak intensity TMB:
(1)
The optical depth τ13(v) is calculated for the 13CO(J = 1–0) brightness temperature of each velocity channel TMB(v) as
(2)
Using the velocity resolution Δv = 0.2 km s−1, the column density of 13CO, N(13CO), is calculated as
(3)
We finally adopt the conversion factor from N(13CO) to N(H2) of 7.7 × 105 (Frerking et al. 1982; Wilson & Rood 1994; Pineda et al. 2010). We present the results in table 2. The column densities derived by assuming the X-factor are slightly higher than those derived using the LTE; however, we can explain these differences by errors in the observations and the abundance ratios [13CO]/[H2] = 1–3.5 × 10−6 and the X-factor =1.8–2.0 × 1020 cm−2 (K km s−1)−1 depending on the surrounding environment.
Table 2.

Column densities*

Region|$N^{1-0}_{\rm X}$||$N^{13,1-0}_{\rm LTE}$|
Chimney 13.182.28
Chimney 24.142.44
Chimney 35.272.70
Chimney 44.722.14
Edge 12.661.90
Edge 23.682.97
Edge 32.821.40
Edge 42.031.72
Edge 52.081.64
Region|$N^{1-0}_{\rm X}$||$N^{13,1-0}_{\rm LTE}$|
Chimney 13.182.28
Chimney 24.142.44
Chimney 35.272.70
Chimney 44.722.14
Edge 12.661.90
Edge 23.682.97
Edge 32.821.40
Edge 42.031.72
Edge 52.081.64
*

Column 1: Region name given in panel (b) of figure 3. Column 2: Column density of H2 derived from 12CO(J = 1–0) in 1021 cm−2 assuming the X-factor. Column 3: Column density of H2 derived from 13CO(J = 1–0) in 1021 cm−2 assuming LTE.

Table 2.

Column densities*

Region|$N^{1-0}_{\rm X}$||$N^{13,1-0}_{\rm LTE}$|
Chimney 13.182.28
Chimney 24.142.44
Chimney 35.272.70
Chimney 44.722.14
Edge 12.661.90
Edge 23.682.97
Edge 32.821.40
Edge 42.031.72
Edge 52.081.64
Region|$N^{1-0}_{\rm X}$||$N^{13,1-0}_{\rm LTE}$|
Chimney 13.182.28
Chimney 24.142.44
Chimney 35.272.70
Chimney 44.722.14
Edge 12.661.90
Edge 23.682.97
Edge 32.821.40
Edge 42.031.72
Edge 52.081.64
*

Column 1: Region name given in panel (b) of figure 3. Column 2: Column density of H2 derived from 12CO(J = 1–0) in 1021 cm−2 assuming the X-factor. Column 3: Column density of H2 derived from 13CO(J = 1–0) in 1021 cm−2 assuming LTE.

We calculated the masses of the chimney and edge clouds using N(H2) derived by assuming the X-factor:
(4)
where |$\bar{\mu }=2.8$|⁠, mH = 1.67 × 10−24 g, Ω = 1.7 × 10−9 sr, and D pc are the mean molecular weight, the mass of the atomic hydrogen, the solid angle subtended by the grid spacing, and the distance to the molecular clouds, respectively. If we assume the distance of D = 5500 pc, the masses of the chimney and edge clouds are 3800 and 2300 M, respectively. Also, the masses of these clouds are 1100 and 700 M assuming the distance of D = 3000 pc.
Additionally, we carried out the RADEX calculation to estimate the temperature and density of the edge cloud using non-local thermodynamic equilibrium radiative transfer code (van der Tak et al. 2007). We input parameter sets of Tk and n(H2) for intervals of 100.1 K in the range of 1 to 100 K and intervals of 100.05 cm−3 in the range of 10 to 104 cm−3, and we calculated the intensities 12CO(J = 1–0), 13CO(J = 1–0), and 12CO(J = 3–2). The line intensity ratios of 13CO(J = 1–0)|$/$|12CO(J = 1–0) and 12CO(J = 3–2)|$/$|12CO(J = 1–0) were then calculated in n(H2)–Tk space. We estimated N(12CO) as
(5)
where N(H2) was derived by assuming the X-factor. Additionally, we assumed N(12CO)/N(13CO) = 62 (Milam et al. 2005). We analyzed the local peaks of 13CO(J = 1–0) of the edge cloud shown in the top left-hand panel of figure 10. The observed line intensity ratios of 13CO(J = 1–0)|$/$|12CO(J = 1–0) and 12CO(J = 3–2)|$/$|12CO(J = 1–0), with one sigma error, are plotted in n(H2)–Tk space with red and blue lines in five plots of figure 10 with the expected optical depth τ(13CO). The parameters at the crossover points of the line intensity ratios correspond to the physical values derived by the RADEX calculation and are listed in table 3. We note that the densities of all regions are much lower than the critical density of 13CO(J = 1–0); nevertheless, the 13CO(J = 1–0) emission is observed. This implies that the edge cloud comprises tiny clumps that cannot be spatially resolved by our observations and are distributed with the low beam-filling factor. In that case, the emission is smoothed out, and the densities are estimated to be lower. Additionally, we find that the western side of the edge cloud has higher density. This result is consistent with the trend of the intensity ratio 12CO(J = 3–2)|$/$|12CO(J = 1–0) shown in panel (b) of figure 9.
Integrated intensity map of the 12CO(J = 1–0) emission of the chimney cloud in the velocity range of 30.1–36.5 km s−1 (top-left) and the results of RADEX analysis conducted at the points shown on the map. Red and blue solid lines respectively represent the intensity ratios 13CO(J = 1–0)$/$12CO(J = 1–0) and 12CO(J = 3–2)$/$12CO(J = 1–0) at each position. The dashed lines associated with each solid line show the 1σ of the ratio. The color represents the optical depth τ(13CO). The parameters at the crossover points of the line intensity ratios correspond to the physical values derived by the RADEX calculation.
Fig. 10.

Integrated intensity map of the 12CO(J = 1–0) emission of the chimney cloud in the velocity range of 30.1–36.5 km s−1 (top-left) and the results of RADEX analysis conducted at the points shown on the map. Red and blue solid lines respectively represent the intensity ratios 13CO(J = 1–0)|$/$|12CO(J = 1–0) and 12CO(J = 3–2)|$/$|12CO(J = 1–0) at each position. The dashed lines associated with each solid line show the 1σ of the ratio. The color represents the optical depth τ(13CO). The parameters at the crossover points of the line intensity ratios correspond to the physical values derived by the RADEX calculation.

Table 3.

Results of RADEX calculation.*

Region|$R^{13/12}_{1-0}$||$R^{12}_{3-2/1-0}$|τ(13CO)n(H2)Tkin
edge 10.154 ± 0.0280.190 ± 0.0201.87|$_{-0.12}^{+0.17}$|320|$_{-100}^{+120}$|8.6|$_{-1.2}^{+1.6}$|
edge 20.195 ± 0.0200.201 ± 0.0140.72|$_{-0.04}^{+0.04}$|880|$_{-180}^{+220}$|7.7|$_{-0.6}^{+0.8}$|
edge 30.123 ± 0.0280.137 ± 0.0181.64|$_{-0.10}^{+0.13}$|270|$_{-90}^{+110}$|8.3|$_{-1.3}^{+2.2}$|
edge 40.204 ± 0.0400.228 ± 0.0300.56|$_{-0.06}^{+0.07}$|800|$_{-280}^{+400}$|8.2|$_{-1.2}^{+1.8}$|
edge 50.166 ± 0.0400.244 ± 0.0330.93|$_{-0.16}^{+0.18}$|740|$_{-340}^{+660}$|9.5|$_{-1.8}^{+2.8}$|
Region|$R^{13/12}_{1-0}$||$R^{12}_{3-2/1-0}$|τ(13CO)n(H2)Tkin
edge 10.154 ± 0.0280.190 ± 0.0201.87|$_{-0.12}^{+0.17}$|320|$_{-100}^{+120}$|8.6|$_{-1.2}^{+1.6}$|
edge 20.195 ± 0.0200.201 ± 0.0140.72|$_{-0.04}^{+0.04}$|880|$_{-180}^{+220}$|7.7|$_{-0.6}^{+0.8}$|
edge 30.123 ± 0.0280.137 ± 0.0181.64|$_{-0.10}^{+0.13}$|270|$_{-90}^{+110}$|8.3|$_{-1.3}^{+2.2}$|
edge 40.204 ± 0.0400.228 ± 0.0300.56|$_{-0.06}^{+0.07}$|800|$_{-280}^{+400}$|8.2|$_{-1.2}^{+1.8}$|
edge 50.166 ± 0.0400.244 ± 0.0330.93|$_{-0.16}^{+0.18}$|740|$_{-340}^{+660}$|9.5|$_{-1.8}^{+2.8}$|
*

Column 1: Region name given in figures 3 and 10. Column 2: Intensity ratio of 13CO(J = 1–0)|$/$|12CO(J = 1–0). Column 3: Intensity ratio of 12CO(J = 3–2)|$/$|12CO(J = 1–0). Column 4: Optical depth of 13CO. Column 5: Number density of H2 in cm−3. Column 6: Kinematic temperature in K.

Table 3.

Results of RADEX calculation.*

Region|$R^{13/12}_{1-0}$||$R^{12}_{3-2/1-0}$|τ(13CO)n(H2)Tkin
edge 10.154 ± 0.0280.190 ± 0.0201.87|$_{-0.12}^{+0.17}$|320|$_{-100}^{+120}$|8.6|$_{-1.2}^{+1.6}$|
edge 20.195 ± 0.0200.201 ± 0.0140.72|$_{-0.04}^{+0.04}$|880|$_{-180}^{+220}$|7.7|$_{-0.6}^{+0.8}$|
edge 30.123 ± 0.0280.137 ± 0.0181.64|$_{-0.10}^{+0.13}$|270|$_{-90}^{+110}$|8.3|$_{-1.3}^{+2.2}$|
edge 40.204 ± 0.0400.228 ± 0.0300.56|$_{-0.06}^{+0.07}$|800|$_{-280}^{+400}$|8.2|$_{-1.2}^{+1.8}$|
edge 50.166 ± 0.0400.244 ± 0.0330.93|$_{-0.16}^{+0.18}$|740|$_{-340}^{+660}$|9.5|$_{-1.8}^{+2.8}$|
Region|$R^{13/12}_{1-0}$||$R^{12}_{3-2/1-0}$|τ(13CO)n(H2)Tkin
edge 10.154 ± 0.0280.190 ± 0.0201.87|$_{-0.12}^{+0.17}$|320|$_{-100}^{+120}$|8.6|$_{-1.2}^{+1.6}$|
edge 20.195 ± 0.0200.201 ± 0.0140.72|$_{-0.04}^{+0.04}$|880|$_{-180}^{+220}$|7.7|$_{-0.6}^{+0.8}$|
edge 30.123 ± 0.0280.137 ± 0.0181.64|$_{-0.10}^{+0.13}$|270|$_{-90}^{+110}$|8.3|$_{-1.3}^{+2.2}$|
edge 40.204 ± 0.0400.228 ± 0.0300.56|$_{-0.06}^{+0.07}$|800|$_{-280}^{+400}$|8.2|$_{-1.2}^{+1.8}$|
edge 50.166 ± 0.0400.244 ± 0.0330.93|$_{-0.16}^{+0.18}$|740|$_{-340}^{+660}$|9.5|$_{-1.8}^{+2.8}$|
*

Column 1: Region name given in figures 3 and 10. Column 2: Intensity ratio of 13CO(J = 1–0)|$/$|12CO(J = 1–0). Column 3: Intensity ratio of 12CO(J = 3–2)|$/$|12CO(J = 1–0). Column 4: Optical depth of 13CO. Column 5: Number density of H2 in cm−3. Column 6: Kinematic temperature in K.

4.2 Association with the SS 433/W 50 system

We here consider the relation between the chimney and edge clouds and the SS 433/W 50 system. Our observations revealed that these clouds are close to the eastern region of W 50 in the plane of the sky. The clouds have clumpy spatial structures and complex velocity structures, including a shift in the central velocity (figures 5 and 6), spectral wings, and wider velocity widths (figures 7 and 8). Additionally, we identified that the density distribution of the edge cloud is not flat [panel (b) of figure 9 and figure 10]. Near the chimney and edge clouds, there is no heating source that might explain their complexity, such as the H ii region radiating UV photons. Also, the gamma-ray emission regions of the SS 433 jet are far from these clouds, above |${0{_{.}^{\circ}}6}$|⁠, and should have less influence. Therefore, the properties of these clouds imply the interaction with the eastern ear of W 50.

Unfortunately, we cannot conclude the interaction from only our observations. There is a possibility that the clouds are mere foreground or background sources of W 50. As an example, Lin et al. (2020) identified a giant molecular filament in the Milky Way Imaging Scroll Painting (MWISP) in front of the SS 433/W 50 system in the velocity range from 27 to 40 km s−1, named GMF MWISP G041−01. We thus need to discuss the association between the molecular clouds that we identified and this giant molecular filament. Lin et al. (2020) suggested that GMF MWISP G041−01 comprises four components, three being filamentary structures. Two such giant filaments possibly collided in the region around |$(\alpha _{\rm J2000.0},\ \delta _{\rm J2000.0}) = ({19^{\rm h}10^{\rm m}01{_{.}^{\rm s}}3525},\ +{7^{\circ}15^{\prime }03{^{\prime \prime }_{.}}330})$| and |$({19^{\rm h}10^{\rm m}29{_{.}^{\rm s}}6389},\ +{6^{\circ}10^{\prime }32{^{\prime \prime }_{.}}713})$|⁠, while they might be just overlapping along the line of sight. If such a collision actually occurred, spectral wings, such as those observed for the chimney and edge clouds, should be seen. The clouds that we identified might then be part of GMF MWISP G041−01. However, the filament–filament collision is located away from the clouds, by approximately 2|${_{.}^{\circ}}$|4, corresponding to 71 pc assuming the distance of GMF MWISP G041−01 to be 1.7 kpc. We thus infer that the clouds that we identified are independent of the system of GMF MWISP G041−01.

Hereafter, we assume that the chimney and edge clouds are related to W 50 and consider the formation mechanism of these molecular clouds. An instinctive formation scenario is that the eastern ear of W 50 compressed the surrounding H i gas, and a shock induced the molecular cloud formation (Asahina et al. 2014, 2017). However, this mechanism would take a long time, approximately 106 yr, to form molecular clouds, and this time is in disagreement with the age of W 50 (a few 104 yr). We then consider the alternative scenario of sweeping tiny molecular clumps by the surface of the eastern ear of W 50, corresponding to the surface of the jet cocoon. As mentioned above, the chimney and edge clouds seem to comprise more small clumps. Additionally, we identified faint and clumpy clouds in the eastern region of W 50 in the velocity range of 30.1–42.3 km s−1 except for the chimney and edge clouds (figure 2). This means that many tiny clumps are drifting at the position of the eastern ear of W 50. The origin of the tiny clumps remains unknown, but there is a possibility that they were formed by the activity of the progenitor star of SS 433, such as by the compression of the surrounding H i gas by the stellar wind. Here, we imagine that the faint clouds are distributed throughout the region before the eastern ear is formed. The mean column density of H2 in the velocity range of 30.1–42.3 km s−1 except for the chimney and edge clouds is 7.18 × 1020 cm−2. We regard the eastern ear as a cylinder with a diameter of 0|${_{.}^{\circ}}$|3 and a height of 0|${_{.}^{\circ}}$|7. Assuming a distance of 3.0 and 5.5 kpc, the eastern ear can collect clumps to a mass of 7.2 × 103M and 2.4 × 104M, respectively. If we reduce the velocity range and consider only the contribution of the northern part of the eastern ear, the mass is comparable to that of the total mass of the chimney and edge clouds. Additionally, this scenario explains the complexity of the velocity structures of the clouds. Note that these clumps might influence the formation theory of the eastern ear of W 50 (Goodall et al. 2011; Ohmura et al. 2021). To consider their effect, we need to carry out additional numerical simulations; however, this is out of the focus of this paper.

Also, we discuss the distance of the SS 433/W 50 system based on the relation with the newly identified clouds. Using the velocity of 33 km s−1, roughly the peak velocity of the chimney and edge clouds, the kinematic distance is 2.2 kpc. This value is far from the historically discussed one in the range of 3.0–5.5 kpc. Here, we suggest that the clouds are unsuitable for deriving the distance based on the model for Galactic rotation. As mentioned above, these clouds probably consist of many small clumps, and they are affected by the motion of the SS 433 jet and experience the velocity shift. Therefore, there is a possibility that these clouds do not simply follow the rotation of the galactic plane. This scenario can explain the reason why the velocities of these clouds are shifted lower; since the eastern jet is approaching, the clouds have been pushed toward us.

We mention the differences between the clouds we identified and that reported by Yamamoto et al. (2022), N4 (see figure 1 and table 1). N4 is not similar to the typical molecular clouds in the Galactic plane, and it shows clear intensity and velocity gradients and a velocity shift from the systemic. In addition, the kinematic temperature of a part of N4 is as high as ∼50 K. The authors suggested that some external force is required to explain these trends. Considering the sources around N4, the SS 433 jet is the most plausible and is thought to be colliding with the cloud. In fact, the X-ray jet and N4 overlap in the plane of the sky, and this scenario is reasonable. On the other hand, although the edge cloud we identified seems to have a density gradient, the absolute values are low compared to the typical Galactic clouds. Also, the cloud has the typical kinematic temperature. The difference between N4 and the newly identified clouds may come from the difference in impact given by the jet. N4 is closer to SS 433 and its jet axis, and the active jet is interacting with N4. On the other hand, the clouds we identified are far from SS 433 and the jet axis, and they are interacting with the surface of the eastern ear of W 50, corresponding to the surface of the jet cocoon. Additional observations such as a shock tracer should verify the difference of influence of the SS 433 jet on these molecular clouds.

4.3 High-velocity clouds in the eastern region of W 50

Finally, we mention molecular clouds in a higher velocity range. The left-hand panel of figure 11 is a velocity-integrated intensity map of 12CO(J = 1–0) at a velocity of 77.7–83.7 km s−1. As mentioned in section 1, Su et al. (2018) suggested that the clouds in this velocity range relate to the SS 433/W 50 system, and we also identified faint clumps with our observation in the closer region of W 50. Since they have completely different velocities, these high-velocity clouds should be independent structures from the chimney and edge clouds. We show the spectrum of the peak intensity position in right-hand panel of figure 11. The center velocity and velocity width are 79.4 km s−1 and 2.41 km s−1, respectively.

(Left) Velocity-integrated intensity maps of 12CO(J = 1–0). The velocity range is 77.7–83.7 km s−1. Black contours show the line of five times the rms value. Magenta contours show the radio continuum observed with the JVLA at 1.602 GHz. The beam sizes of CO emission and continuum observations are shown in the bottom left-hand corner of each panel by a white circle and a magenta ellipse, respectively. (Right) 12CO(J = 1–0) spectra of the peak position of the high-velocity clouds shown in the left-hand panel. The red dashed line shows the value of three times the rms.
Fig. 11.

(Left) Velocity-integrated intensity maps of 12CO(J = 1–0). The velocity range is 77.7–83.7 km s−1. Black contours show the line of five times the rms value. Magenta contours show the radio continuum observed with the JVLA at 1.602 GHz. The beam sizes of CO emission and continuum observations are shown in the bottom left-hand corner of each panel by a white circle and a magenta ellipse, respectively. (Right) 12CO(J = 1–0) spectra of the peak position of the high-velocity clouds shown in the left-hand panel. The red dashed line shows the value of three times the rms.

In fact, the clumps that we identified seem to be similar to the molecular clouds reported by Su et al. (2018). However, they have a different feature (see figure 13 of their paper). Su et al. (2018) suggested that the eastern molecular clouds of the SS 433/W 50 system are approaching us. In their model, the clouds closer to the SS 433/W 50 system have a higher velocity owing to their interaction with the jet. Although the clumps that we identified are closer to W 50 than their clouds, the central velocity is lower than their highest cloud velocity of 84 km s−1. This means that the high-velocity clouds in the present study are not a member of the clouds identified by Su et al. (2018), or they have slightly different kinematic properties owing to the offset from the SS 433 jet axis. Note that the detected signal from these clumps is very weak, and our observation is not suitable for discussing the details. We need to observe them more deeply to extract a more robust conclusion.

5 Conclusion

We reported the observation of molecular clouds at the eastern edge of W 50 with the Nobeyama 45 m telescope and the ASTE. We identified two clouds that possibly interact with the SS 433/W 50 system for the first time. One is in the northern region of the eastern ear of W 50, where there is a protruding structure called the chimney. The other is located at the eastern edge of the ear. Both clouds comprise small clumps that might not be resolved sufficiently by our observations. They have complex velocity structures with spectral wings and broadening, and it is unclear whether these features are due to an interaction with W 50 or merely overlapping multiple components. The distribution of the intensity ratio and the results of RADEX analysis reveal that the western side of the edge cloud has higher density. Although it is difficult to conclude the relationship between the clouds that we identified and the SS 433/W 50 system, the clouds were possibly formed by the propagation of the eastern ear of W 50 and the sweeping of tiny clumps. Finally, we identified the high-velocity clouds at the eastern edge of W 50 in the same velocity range as the clouds reported by Su et al. (2018), while it is unclear whether they belong to the same series.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Drs. M. Kohno, K. Tsuge, and Y. Yamane and to Mr. D. Tsutsumi for supporting our observations. We thank Dr. H. Sano for helpful comments and discussion for the interaction of the cloud with the GXB jet. We thank the anonymous referee for useful comments and constructive suggestions. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers HS: 20J13339, 22K20386, MM: 19K03916, 20H01941, 22H01272, and KT: 18H05440, 20H01945, 22H00152. The Nobeyama 45 m radio telescope is operated by Nobeyama Radio Observatory, a branch of National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. The ASTE telescope is operated by National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ). The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation (NSF) operated under a cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc. Data analysis was partly carried out on the Multi-wavelength Data Analysis System operated by the Astronomy Data Center (ADC) at the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. This work was supported by the Japan Foundation for Promotion of Astronomy. SAOImageDS9 development was made possible by funding from the Chandra X-ray Science Center (CXC), the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Center (HEASARC), and the JWST Mission office at the Space Telescope Science Institute (Joye & Mandel 2003). This research used, Astropy 〈http://www.astropy.org〉, a community-developed core Python package for Astronomy (Astropy Collaboration 2013, 2018). We thank Edanz 〈https://jp.edanz.com/ac〉 for editing a draft of this manuscript.

References

Abell
 
G. O.
,
Margon
 
B.
 
1979
,
Nature
,
279
,
701

Asahina
 
Y.
,
Kawashima
 
T.
,
Furukawa
 
N.
,
Enokiya
 
R.
,
Yamamoto
 
H.
,
Fukui
 
Y.
,
Matsumoto
 
R.
 
2017
,
ApJ
,
836
,
213

Asahina
 
Y.
,
Ogawa
 
T.
,
Kawashima
 
T.
,
Furukawa
 
N.
,
Enokiya
 
R.
,
Yamamoto
 
H.
,
Fukui
 
Y.
,
Matsumoto
 
R.
 
2014
,
ApJ
,
789
,
79

Astropy Collaboration
 
2013
,
A&A
,
558
,
A33

Astropy Collaboration
 
2018
,
AJ
,
156
,
123

Blundell
 
K. M.
,
Bowler
 
M. G.
 
2004
,
ApJ
,
616
,
L159

Bolatto
 
A. D.
,
Wolfire
 
M.
,
Leroy
 
A. K.
 
2013
,
ARA&A
,
51
,
207

Brand
 
J.
,
Blitz
 
L.
 
1993
,
A&A
,
275
,
67

Broderick
 
J. W.
 et al.  
2018
,
MNRAS
,
475
,
5360

Cooper
 
A. J.
,
Gaggero
 
D.
,
Markoff
 
S.
,
Zhang
 
S.
 
2020
,
MNRAS
,
493
,
3212

Davydov
 
V. V.
,
Esipov
 
V. F.
,
Cherepashchuk
 
A. M.
 
2008
,
Astron. Rep.
,
52
,
487

Downes
 
A. J. B.
,
Pauls
 
T.
,
Salter
 
C. J.
 
1981a
,
A&A
,
103
,
277

Downes
 
A. J. B.
,
Pauls
 
T.
,
Salter
 
C. J.
 
1986
,
MNRAS
,
218
,
393

Downes
 
A. J. B.
,
Salter
 
C. J.
,
Pauls
 
T.
 
1981b
,
A&A
,
97
,
296

Dubner
 
G. M.
,
Holdaway
 
M.
,
Goss
 
W. M.
,
Mirabel
 
I. F.
 
1998
,
AJ
,
116
,
1842

Ezawa
 
H.
,
Kawabe
 
R.
,
Kohno
 
K.
,
Yamamoto
 
S.
 
2004
,
SPIE Proc.
,
5489
,
763

Farnes
 
J. S.
,
Gaensler
 
B. M.
,
Purcell
 
C.
,
Sun
 
X. H.
,
Haverkorn
 
M.
,
Lenc
 
E.
,
O’Sullivan
 
S. P.
,
Akahori
 
T.
 
2017
,
MNRAS
,
467
,
4777

Frerking
 
M. A.
,
Langer
 
W. D.
,
Wilson
 
R. W.
 
1982
,
ApJ
,
262
,
590

Geldzahler
 
B. J.
,
Pauls
 
T.
,
Salter
 
C. J.
 
1980
,
A&A
,
84
,
237

Goodall
 
P. T.
,
Alouani-Bibi
 
F.
,
Blundell
 
K. M.
 
2011
,
MNRAS
,
414
,
2838

Heinz
 
S.
,
Grimm
 
H. J.
,
Sunyaev
 
R. A.
,
Fender
 
R. P.
 
2008
,
ApJ
,
686
,
1145

Hjellming
 
R. M.
,
Johnston
 
K. J.
 
1981
,
ApJ
,
246
,
L141

Joye
 
W. A.
,
Mandel
 
E.
 
2003
,
ASP Conf. Ser.
,
295
,
489

Kuno
 
N.
 et al.  
2011
,
IAU Symp. 277, Tracing the Ancestry of Galaxies
, ed.
Carignan
 
C.
 et al.
(
Cambridge
:
Cambridge University Press
),
67

Kutner
 
M. L.
,
Ulich
 
B. L.
 
1981
,
ApJ
,
250
,
341

Lin
 
L.-H.
,
Wang
 
H.-C.
,
Su
 
Y.
,
Li
 
C.
,
Yang
 
J.
 
2020
,
Res. Astron. Astrophys.
,
20
,
143

Liu
 
Q.-C.
,
Chen
 
Y.
,
Zhou
 
P.
,
Zhang
 
X.
,
Jiang
 
B.
 
2020
,
ApJ
,
892
,
143

Lockman
 
F. J.
,
Blundell
 
K. M.
,
Goss
 
W. M.
 
2007
,
MNRAS
,
381
,
881

Margon
 
B.
 
1984
,
ARA&A
,
22
,
507

Margon
 
B.
,
Anderson
 
S. F.
 
1989
,
ApJ
,
347
,
448

Milam
 
S. N.
,
Savage
 
C.
,
Brewster
 
M. A.
,
Ziurys
 
L. M.
,
Wyckoff
 
S.
 
2005
,
ApJ
,
634
,
1126

Minamidani
 
T.
 et al.  
2016
,
SPIE Proc.
,
9914
,
99141Z

Mirabel
 
I. F.
,
Chaty
 
S.
,
Rodríguez
 
L. F.
,
Sauvage
 
M.
 
2015
,
IAUS
,
313
,
370

Ohmura
 
T.
,
Ono
 
K.
,
Sakemi
 
H.
,
Tashima
 
Y.
,
Omae
 
R.
,
Machida
 
M.
 
2021
,
ApJ
,
910
,
149

Peek
 
J. E. G.
 et al.  
2011
,
ApJS
,
194
,
20

Pineda
 
J. L.
,
Goldsmith
 
P. F.
,
Chapman
 
N.
,
Snell
 
R. L.
,
Li
 
D.
,
Cambrésy
 
L.
,
Brunt
 
C.
 
2010
,
ApJ
,
721
,
686

Sakemi
 
H.
,
Omae
 
R.
,
Ohmura
 
T.
,
Machida
 
M.
 
2021
,
PASJ
,
73
,
530

Sawada
 
T.
 et al.  
2008
,
PASJ
,
60
,
445

Su
 
Y.
,
Zhou
 
X.
,
Yang
 
J.
,
Chen
 
Y.
,
Chen
 
X.
,
Zhang
 
S.
 
2018
,
ApJ
,
863
,
103

Tetarenko
 
A. J.
,
Freeman
 
P.
,
Rosolowsky
 
E. W.
,
Miller-Jones
 
J. C. A.
,
Sivakoff
 
G. R.
 
2018
,
MNRAS
,
475
,
448

Tetarenko
 
A. J.
,
Rosolowsky
 
E. W.
,
Miller-Jones
 
J. C. A.
,
Sivakoff
 
G. R.
 
2020
,
MNRAS
,
497
,
3504

van der Tak
 
F. F. S.
,
Black
 
J. H.
,
Schöier
 
F. L.
,
Jansen
 
D. J.
,
van Dishoeck
 
E. F.
 
2007
,
A&A
,
468
,
627

Wang
 
Y.
,
Jaffe
 
D. T.
,
Graf
 
U. U.
,
Evans
 
N. J.
 
1994
,
ApJS
,
95
,
503

Wilson
 
T. L.
,
Rood
 
R.
 
1994
,
ARA&A
,
32
,
191

Wilson
 
T. L.
,
Rohlfs
 
K.
,
Hüttemeister
 
S.
 
2009
,
Tools of Radio Astronomy
(
Berlin
:
Springer-Verlag
)

Yamamoto
 
H.
 et al.  
2008
,
PASJ
,
60
,
715

Yamamoto
 
H.
,
Okamoto
 
R.
,
Murata
 
Y.
,
Nakanishi
 
H.
,
Imai
 
H.
,
Kurahara
 
K.
 
2022
,
PASJ
,
74
,
4932

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)