Abstract

We derive the entire dust extinction (AV) map for the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) estimated from the color excess at near-infrared wavelengths. Using the percentile method we recently adopted to evaluate AV distribution along the line of sight, we derive three-dimensional (3D) AV maps of the three massive star-forming regions of N44, N79, and N11 based on the IRSF/SIRIUS point source catalog. The 3D AV maps are compared with the hydrogen column densities N(H) of three different velocity components where one is of the LMC disk velocity and the other two are of velocities lower than the disk velocity. As a result, we obtain a 3D dust geometry suggesting that gas collision is ongoing between the different velocity components. We also find differences in the timing of the gas collision between the massive star-forming regions, which indicates that the gas collision in N44, N79, and N11 occurred later than that in 30 Doradus. In addition, a difference of a factor of two in AV/N(H) is found between the velocity components for N44, while a significant difference is not found for N79 and N11. From the 3D geometry and AV/N(H) in each star-forming region, we suggest that the massive star formation in N44 was induced by an external trigger of tidal interaction between the LMC and the Small Magellanic Cloud, while that in N79 and N11 is likely to have been induced by internal triggers such as gas converging from the galactic spiral arm and expansion of a supershell, although the possibility of tidal interaction cannot be ruled out.

1 Introduction

The Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) is a dwarf galaxy with morphological features such as an off-center stellar bar and a single spiral arm, accompanied by the Magellanic Bridge, which is a H i gas structure connecting the LMC and the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). These features are considered to be evidence for the tidal interaction between the LMC and the SMC (e.g., Besla et al. 2012; Diaz & Bekki 2012). The LMC is one of the nearest interacting galaxies at a distance of ≃50 kpc (Pietrzyński et al. 2019) with almost face-on orientation (i ∼ 35°; van der Marel & Cioni 2001), which enables us to investigate the spatial distribution of the interstellar medium (ISM) with high angular resolution (<1 pc) in almost two dimensions. In addition, the metallicity of the LMC (Z ∼ 0.5 Z; Westerlund 1997) is similar to a value typical of the ISM at redshift z ∼ 0.5 (Pei et al. 1999) corresponding to a relatively active phase of the star-formation history in the Universe. Furthermore, active star formation is ongoing in the LMC, where 30 Doradus (30 Dor) is the most active starburst region in the Local Group (e.g., Kennicutt 1984). Thanks to these characteristics, the LMC is a site suitable for investigating how galactic interaction occurs and how massive star formation is induced in low-metallicity environments.

Recent studies using H i and CO data suggest that the massive star formations in 30 Dor and N159 in the LMC H i ridge region were induced by the galactic interaction between the LMC and the SMC (Fukui et al. 2017, 2019; Tokuda et al. 2019). Fukui et al. (2017) identify two velocity H i components; one is the velocity component of the LMC disk and the other is a low-velocity component relative to the disk velocity. Fukui et al. (2017) and Tsuge et al. (2019) identify an intermediate-velocity component between them for 30 Dor and N159, which is considered to be evidence for gas collision. In addition, they evaluate the dust/gas ratio from the comparison of the H i intensity with the dust optical depth, and find that the dust/gas ratio for the LMC H i ridge region is lower than that for the LMC stellar-bar region. Based on the low dust/gas ratio and numerical simulations (e.g., Bekki & Chiba 2007a, 2007b; Yozin & Bekki 2014), they suggest that low-metallicity gas from the SMC (Z ∼ 0.2 Z; Russell & Dopita 1992) is falling on to the LMC disk. More recently, Tsuge et al. (2020) investigated the spatial correlation between the intermediate-velocity component and massive stars in the entire LMC field, and suggest that the galactic interaction may have induced a large part (∼70%) of the massive star formation in the LMC. In order to investigate such gas collisions between the gas in the LMC and an inflow gas from the SMC, it is important to study the dust/gas ratio and three-dimensional (3D) dust geometry over the whole LMC.

Furuta et al. (2019) constructed a near-infrared (NIR) dust extinction (AV) map of the LMC H i ridge region to evaluate the dust/gas ratio. They proposed a method to decompose AV into different velocity components from the comparison of AV with hydrogen column densities of different velocities. They decomposed AV into the three velocity components mentioned above, and found that the dust/gas ratio of the low-velocity component is significantly lower than that of the disk-velocity one. Furthermore, Furuta et al. (2021) developed a new method to evaluate 3D dust geometry from the NIR dust extinction, and applied it to the H i ridge region. They decomposed the resultant 3D AV map into the three velocity components using the fitting method described in Furuta et al. (2019), and obtained the detailed dust geometry of the different velocity components, from which they found that the gas collision with the inflow gas from the SMC had occurred in 30 Dor prior to N159.

In the present paper, we extend the analysis of the LMC H i ridge region by Furuta et al. (2021) to the entire LMC field. We especially focus on the massive star-forming regions of N44, N79, and N11 for which the tidal interaction between the Magellanic Clouds is reported (Tsuge et al. 2019, 2020). This paper is organized as follows: we summarize the data in section 2 and give a brief review of the method to evaluate the 3D dust extinction in section 3. The resultant dust extinction maps and a comparison with gas observations are presented in section 4. We discuss the 3D geometry and origin of massive star-forming regions in section 5, and summarize our results in section 6.

2 The data

2.1 Point source catalog observed with IRSF/SIRIUS

We used the NIR (J, H, and Ks bands) Magellanic Cloud point source catalog observed with the InfraRed Survey Facility (IRSF) 1.4 m telescope (Kato et al. 2007; hereafter the IRSF catalog). The IRSF catalog covers a 40 deg2 area of the LMC. The 10σ limiting magnitudes of the J, H, and Ks bands are 18.8, 17.8, and 16.6 mag, respectively, which are three magnitudes deeper than those of the 2MASS catalog. In the IRSF catalog, systematic photometric errors due to inappropriate flat-field correction were reported, and thus Furuta et al. (2019) updated the IRSF catalog by applying the corrected flat-field images to the raw data of the catalog (see section 2 of Furuta et al. 2019). In this study, data are selected from the updated IRSF catalog that satisfy the following criteria: (1) the J-, H-, and Ks-band magnitudes are brighter than the 10σ limiting magnitudes of the original IRSF catalog, (2) the shapes of sources are “point like” (the “quality flag” is 1) in all the bands, and (3) at least eight dithered frames are combined in all the bands.

Since Galactic foreground stars leading to underestimation of the dust extinction are included in the IRSF catalog, we identify stellar populations using the classification by Furuta et al. (2019). Stellar populations are classified into three categories that primarily consist of Galactic foreground contamination, red giant branch (RGB) stars, and dwarf stars, using a color–magnitude (JK vs. K) diagram (figure 1a). In the present paper, only the objects classified as RGB stars are used, a number density map of which is shown in figure 2.

(a) Color–magnitude (J − K and K) diagram of the samples of the entire LMC. Contours show the number densities binned by 0.05 mag. The contour levels are 101.5–103.5 in steps of 100.5. Black solid lines are boundary positions to classify stellar populations into three categories of dwarf, foreground, and RGB stars. The lines connected with the circles and squares are the loci of RGB and main-sequence stars, respectively, derived from Allen (2000). (b) Color–color (H − K and J − H) diagram of the RGB samples selected from panel (a). Contours are the same as those in panel (a) but the levels are 101.5–104.5 in steps of 100.5. The line connected with the red circles shows the intrinsic colors of RGB stars derived from Bessell and Brett (1988). The black arrow is the reddening vector corresponding to AV = 10 mag. Black points are YSO candidates matched to the RGB samples. (Color online)
Fig. 1.

(a) Color–magnitude (JK and K) diagram of the samples of the entire LMC. Contours show the number densities binned by 0.05 mag. The contour levels are 101.5–103.5 in steps of 100.5. Black solid lines are boundary positions to classify stellar populations into three categories of dwarf, foreground, and RGB stars. The lines connected with the circles and squares are the loci of RGB and main-sequence stars, respectively, derived from Allen (2000). (b) Color–color (HK and JH) diagram of the RGB samples selected from panel (a). Contours are the same as those in panel (a) but the levels are 101.5–104.5 in steps of 100.5. The line connected with the red circles shows the intrinsic colors of RGB stars derived from Bessell and Brett (1988). The black arrow is the reddening vector corresponding to AV = 10 mag. Black points are YSO candidates matched to the RGB samples. (Color online)

RGB star number density map of the LMC. The grid size is ${1{^{\prime }_{.}}6}\times {1{^{\prime }_{.}}6}$. The color scale shows the number of stars included in a grid. (Color online)
Fig. 2.

RGB star number density map of the LMC. The grid size is 1.6×1.6. The color scale shows the number of stars included in a grid. (Color online)

In principle, intrinsically red stars such as young stellar objects (YSOs) can contaminate the selected RGB samples. To check the contamination of YSOs, we match the RGB samples with the YSO candidates in the whole LMC derived from Whitney et al. (2008), Gruendl and Chu (2009), and Seale et al. (2014). We also use the list of YSOs presented by Carlson et al. (2012), who identify YSOs in the nine star-forming regions in the LMC. The total number of YSO candidates is 5714. A matching distance of 5 is adopted, which is the same value as used by Seale et al. (2014). As a result of the matching, only ∼0.13% (2033/1522279) of the RGB samples in the whole LMC are identified as YSOs. The YSOs matched to our RGB samples are plotted as black points on a color–color (HK and JH) diagram in figure 1b. The fraction of contamination of YSOs increases with the dust extinction (AV); the fraction is 0.31% (877/278612) for samples with AV > 1.0 mag, while it is 1.12% (549/49008) for samples with AV > 2.0 mag. In this way, a small fraction of YSOs contaminates the RGB samples, leading to overestimation of AV, especially in star-forming regions. We eliminate such intrinsically red stars from the RGB samples using the percentile method for deriving AV maps, as described in subsection 3.1.

2.2 Gas tracer

For comparison of the dust extinction with the hydrogen column density, we use the H i data observed with the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA) and Parkes (Kim et al. 2003), and the 12CO (J = 1–0) data observed with the NANTEN 4 m telescope (Fukui et al. 1999). Fukui et al. (2017) and Tsuge et al. (2019) calculate the velocity relative to the galactic rotation defined as Voffset, and decompose the H i and CO integrated intensity maps into three velocity components defined as the L- (low), I- (intermediate), and D- (disk) components according to the integrated velocity ranges of Voffset = −100 to −30, −30 to −10, and −10 to 10 kms1, respectively (for the analysis and an example of the H i spectra, see Tsuge et al. 2019).

Following Tsuge et al. (2019), the H i intensity maps are converted into H i column density [N(Hi)] maps using the conversion factor XHI=1.82×1018cm2/(Kkms1) (Dickey & Lockman 1990), while the CO intensity maps are converted into the H2 column density [N(H2)] maps using the CO to H2 conversion factor, XCO=7×1020cm2/(Kkms1), which is the averaged XCO over the LMC (Fukui et al. 2008). The total hydrogen column densities N(H) are calculated for the L-, I-, and D-components as
(1)
The spatial resolutions of the gas maps are reduced to be the same as that of the dust extinction map by convolving them with a boxcar kernel of 5 × 5.

2.3 Dust emission

To compare the dust extinction with the dust emission, we use the dust optical depth at 353 GHz (τ353) derived from the Planck and IRAS data (Planck Collaboration 2014). The comparison between the dust extinction and emission gives an insight into the dust geometry because the dust extinction only traces the dust located in front of stars, while the dust emission traces all the dust existing along the line of sight. As a dust emission map of the LMC, we use the τ353 map created by Tsuge et al. (2019), who subtract the Galactic foreground τ353 values. The spatial resolution of the τ353 map is adjusted to that of the dust extinction map by the same procedure as the gas maps.

3 Method

Furuta et al. (2021) developed a new method to evaluate the 3D dust geometry for study of the LMC H i ridge region. The detailed procedure is described in their paper (see section 3 of Furuta et al. 2021). Here, we introduce a brief review of the method.

3.1 Derivation of dust distribution along the line of sight

Below we show the calculation procedure of dust distribution along the line of sight for a low H i column density region (<5×1020cm2) at (α, δ)J2000.0 = (5h32m, −6914) where we expect to obtain the distribution in the case of no appreciable dust. In figure 3a, we present a color–color diagram (CC diagram) in a spatial bin of 5×5 centered at the region. We first estimate AV for individual stars from the color excess between the observed and intrinsic colors of RGB stars along the reddening vector (black arrow in figure 3a) on the CC diagram. Here, we assume the intrinsic colors derived from Bessell and Brett (1988) and the reddening vector of Cardelli, Clayton, and Mathis (1989).

Procedure to estimate AV along the line of sight in a spatial bin of ${5^{\prime }}$ for a low H i column density region. (a) Example of the color–color (H − K and J − H) diagram of stars in a spatial bin centered at (α, δ)J2000.0 = (${5^h32^m}$, −${69^{\circ}14^{\prime }}$). Black squares and red circles are the intrinsic and observed colors of RGB stars, respectively. The reddening vector is shown as a black arrow corresponding to AV = 3 mag. (b) Histograms of observed (red) and simulated (blue) AV for stars in panel (a). (c) Observed (red) and simulated (blue) AV distributions plotted at every five stars as a function of the cumulative number of stars for samples in panel (a). (d) Mean AV included in the $X\%$ to $(X+10)\%$ percentile of AV shown in panel (c). (e) Difference in AV at each $X\%$ between the observed and simulated values shown in panel (d). (Color online)
Fig. 3.

Procedure to estimate AV along the line of sight in a spatial bin of 5 for a low H i column density region. (a) Example of the color–color (HK and JH) diagram of stars in a spatial bin centered at (α, δ)J2000.0 = (5h32m, −6914). Black squares and red circles are the intrinsic and observed colors of RGB stars, respectively. The reddening vector is shown as a black arrow corresponding to AV = 3 mag. (b) Histograms of observed (red) and simulated (blue) AV for stars in panel (a). (c) Observed (red) and simulated (blue) AV distributions plotted at every five stars as a function of the cumulative number of stars for samples in panel (a). (d) Mean AV included in the X% to (X+10)% percentile of AV shown in panel (c). (e) Difference in AV at each X% between the observed and simulated values shown in panel (d). (Color online)

Here, it is noted that recent studies show the dependence of RGB colors on stellar metallicity (e.g., Valenti et al. 2004) together with the metallicity gradient in the LMC (e.g., Choudhury et al. 2021), which can lead to an unintended bias in AV at different galactocentric distances across the LMC with the intrinsic colors of Bessell and Brett (1988) that do not consider the metallicity dependence. Therefore, we check how much the intrinsic colors are affected by the metallicity gradient. Choudhury et al. (2021) find the average metallicity of [Fe/H] = −0.42 dex and a shallow metallicity gradient of −0.008 dex kpc1 from the galactic center in the LMC using the color–magnitude diagram of RGB stars. Our AV map covers radii up to 2.6 kpc from the center, and thus the stellar metallicity can vary by at most −0.02 dex. By changing the stellar metallicity from −0.42 to −0.44 dex considering the above metallicity gradient, the M0-type RGB colors that depend on stellar metallicity proposed by Valenti, Ferraro, and Origlia (2004) change from 0.6922 to 0.6892 mag for JH and from 0.1059 to 0.1055 mag for HK. The changes in the colors are much smaller than the average photometric errors of 0.03 and 0.06 mag for the JH and HK colors of our samples, respectively, and thus the metallicity gradient in the LMC would not change our results significantly.

In the second step, we sort the estimated AV from low to high for each spatial bin. The sorted AV distribution is shown by the red histogram in figure 3b, while the sorted AV values at every five stars are shown by the red circles as a function of the cumulative number of stars in figure 3c. The AV values in figure 3c monotonically increase due to the dust existing along the line of sight. However, even when no dust exists along the line of sight, the sorted AV values increase due to the AV scatter caused by the photometric errors. Thus, in the third step, we simulate the AV scatter by a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate this effect.

We generate a random set of the JH and HK colors for individual stars on the CC diagram in each spatial bin under the assumption that the stellar colors follow a 2D Gaussian distribution. Here, we adopt the observed colors and photometric errors as the center and the standard deviation of the Gaussian distribution, respectively. AV for each simulated star is calculated by the same procedure as the first step. The blue histogram and squares in figures 3b and 3c, respectively, show the resultant distribution of the simulated values, which is considered to be AV scatter due to the photometric errors alone.

In the next step, the mean percentile values for both observed and simulated AV are calculated in the range of the X% to (X + 10)% percentile for X = 10% to 80% in steps of 10%. Here, we adopt not 100% but 90% as the upper percentile limit for calculation of AV to avoid overestimation of AV due to the contamination of intrinsically red stars such as YSOs and asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars as described in Dobashi et al. (2008). Since the fraction of contamination of YSOs is small (∼1%) even in high AV regions as mentioned in subsection 2.1, the intrinsically red stars should be eliminated from our samples through the percentile method. Red circles and blue squares in figure 3d are the resultant mean observed and simulated percentile AV for each X%, respectively. In order to evaluate the intrinsic AV distribution, we finally subtract the simulated percentile AV values from the observed one at each percentile range (figure 3e), which is defined as AV(X%). For example, AV(80%), corresponding to near-total integrated dust extinction, is the mean AV from the 80% to 90% percentile of observed AV after subtracting simulated percentile AV in the same percentile range.

The uncertainty of AV(X%) is measured by the error propagation, δAV(X%)=σAV,X2+σd,X2, where σAV,X is the uncertainty of percentile AV, while σd,X virtually corresponds to the uncertainty of the distance. σAV,X is calculated by propagation of the AV uncertainty included in the X% to (X + 10)% percentile. On the other hand, σd,X is calculated based on the simple count uncertainty (i.e., N; N is the number of the total stars contained in the bin), and determined by half the difference in AV between the index of the integer part of (icenter+N) and that of (icenterN), where icenter is the median index of stars in the range of the X% to (X + 10)% percentile. The uncertainty of δAV(X%) is used for the comparison of the dust extinction with the hydrogen column density to evaluate the dust geometry and the dust/gas ratio (subsection 3.2).

AV(X%) in figure 3e is almost constant for all X%, which indicates that dust clouds associated with the LMC are not detected significantly at this spatial bin, as expected from the low column density region. The constant AV of 0.2 mag is likely to be caused by the Galactic foreground extinction and is actually consistent with the foreground extinction ∼0.2 mag (Dobashi et al. 2008).

In figure 4, we present another result for the spatial bin centered at (α, δ)J2000.0 = (5h23m, −6803) in N44 where the D-component is detected (the position is plotted in figure 11). The observed histogram in figure 4a has a peak around AV = 0 mag and shows AV systematically larger (>1.5 mag) than the simulated histogram. AV(X%) from X = 10% to 30% in figure 4c has an almost constant value of ∼0.2 mag corresponding to the Galactic foreground extinction. On the other hand, AV(X%) rapidly increases from X=40% onward. These results indicate that a dust cloud is present from X=40% to 80%, which is consistent with the existence of the high column density gas of the D-component.

Same as panels (b), (d), and (e) of figure 3 but for the region having a high column density of the D-component at (α, δ)J2000.0 = (${5^h23m}$, −${68^{\circ}03^{\prime }}$) in N44. (Color online)
Fig. 4.

Same as panels (b), (d), and (e) of figure 3 but for the region having a high column density of the D-component at (α, δ)J2000.0 = (5h23m, −6803) in N44. (Color online)

Total integrated dust extinction map [$A_V(80\%)$] in the entire LMC field. The spatial resolution is ${5^{\prime }}$ with a grid size of ${1{^{\prime }_{.}}6}$. Black contours show the total hydrogen column density covering all the velocity ranges of the L-, I-, and D-components with contour levels of $(2.0\mbox{--}8.0) \times 10^{21}\, \rm cm^{-2}$ in steps of $2.0\times 10^{21}\, \rm cm^{-2}$. White contours show the total hydrogen column density of the L-component with levels of $(0.7,\ 1.6,\ 2.5,\ 3.4,\ 4.2,\ 5.1,\ \mbox{and}\ 6.0) \times 10^{21}\, \rm cm^{-2}$. Gray regions are masked bins due to the inappropriate observational data. (Color online)
Fig. 5.

Total integrated dust extinction map [AV(80%)] in the entire LMC field. The spatial resolution is 5 with a grid size of 1.6. Black contours show the total hydrogen column density covering all the velocity ranges of the L-, I-, and D-components with contour levels of (2.0--8.0)×1021cm2 in steps of 2.0×1021cm2. White contours show the total hydrogen column density of the L-component with levels of (0.7, 1.6, 2.5, 3.4, 4.2, 5.1, and 6.0)×1021cm2. Gray regions are masked bins due to the inappropriate observational data. (Color online)

Uncertainty map [$\delta A_V(80\%)$] of the total integrated dust extinction map in figure 5. White contours are the same as the black contours in figure 5. (Color online)
Fig. 6.

Uncertainty map [δAV(80%)] of the total integrated dust extinction map in figure 5. White contours are the same as the black contours in figure 5. (Color online)

Dust extinction map in the entire LMC field using the 2MASS catalog (Dobashi et al. 2008). The area, the color scale, and the black contours are same as those in figure 5. (Color online)
Fig. 7.

Dust extinction map in the entire LMC field using the 2MASS catalog (Dobashi et al. 2008). The area, the color scale, and the black contours are same as those in figure 5. (Color online)

Integrated dust extinction maps of N44 from observers to stars included in the $X\%$ percentile for $X=10\%$ to $80\%$ in steps of $10\%$. (Color online)
Fig. 8.

Integrated dust extinction maps of N44 from observers to stars included in the X% percentile for X=10% to 80% in steps of 10%. (Color online)

Same as figure 8 but for N79. (Color online)
Fig. 9.

Same as figure 8 but for N79. (Color online)

Same as figure 8 but for N11. (Color online)
Fig. 10.

Same as figure 8 but for N11. (Color online)

$A_V(80\%)$ maps of N44 superposed on the $N(\rm H)$ maps of the (a) L-, (b) I-, and (c) D-components shown with black contours. The contour levels are $(0.7,\ 1.6,\ 2.5,\ 3.4,\ 4.2,\ 5.1,\ \mbox{and}\ 6.0)\times 10^{21}\, \rm cm^{-2}$. White contours show the 1.5σ level of $^{12}\rm CO$ intensity. (d) $A_V(80\%)$ map superposed on dust emission of τ353 with contour levels of (1.6, 3.0, 4.3, 5.7, and 7.0) × 10−5. A cross symbol shows the position from which the plots in figure 4 are created. (Color online)
Fig. 11.

AV(80%) maps of N44 superposed on the N(H) maps of the (a) L-, (b) I-, and (c) D-components shown with black contours. The contour levels are (0.7, 1.6, 2.5, 3.4, 4.2, 5.1, and 6.0)×1021cm2. White contours show the 1.5σ level of 12CO intensity. (d) AV(80%) map superposed on dust emission of τ353 with contour levels of (1.6, 3.0, 4.3, 5.7, and 7.0) × 10−5. A cross symbol shows the position from which the plots in figure 4 are created. (Color online)

3.2 Decomposition of dust extinction into different velocities

We describe the procedure to decompose AV into different velocity components as proposed by Furuta et al. (2019). The decomposition is performed by a comparison of the dust extinction map with the hydrogen column density maps of different velocities on a pixel-by-pixel basis. The fitting method is based on χ2 minimization using δAV(X%) calculated in subsection 3.1. The fitting function is the linear regression described as
(2)
where ak and xk are free parameters corresponding to the dust/gas ratios [i.e., AV/N(H)] and XCO of the k (k = L, I, and D) components, respectively. N(Hi)k and W(CO)k are the Hi column density and CO intensity of the k-component, respectively. Applying this fitting to each AV(X%) map from X = 10% to 80%, we decompose the AV distribution along the line of sight into the three different velocity components. From the changes of the resultant ak (i.e., decomposed AV of the k-component) with X%, we evaluate the 3D dust geometry of different velocities (see figures 13 and 14 of Furuta et al. 2021).
Same as figure 11 but for N79. Contour levels are also the same as those in figure 11. The comparison of $A_V(80\%)$ with N(H) of the L-component is not shown because the L-component is not detected significantly with these contour levels (see figure 5). The right-hand side of the map is noisy due to the low number densities of stars (figure 6). (Color online)
Fig. 12.

Same as figure 11 but for N79. Contour levels are also the same as those in figure 11. The comparison of AV(80%) with N(H) of the L-component is not shown because the L-component is not detected significantly with these contour levels (see figure 5). The right-hand side of the map is noisy due to the low number densities of stars (figure 6). (Color online)

Same as figure 11 but for N11. Contour levels are also the same as those in figure 11. The comparison of $A_V(80\%)$ with N(H) of the L-component is not shown because the L-component is not detected significantly with these contour levels. The right-hand side of the map is noisy due to the low number densities of stars. (Color online)
Fig. 13.

Same as figure 11 but for N11. Contour levels are also the same as those in figure 11. The comparison of AV(80%) with N(H) of the L-component is not shown because the L-component is not detected significantly with these contour levels. The right-hand side of the map is noisy due to the low number densities of stars. (Color online)

Fitting parameters of AV/N(H) for (a) N44, (b) N79, and (c) N11 estimated from the linear regression of equation (2). Squares and triangles are the parameters of the D- and L+I-components, respectively. Black horizontal lines are 1/5, 1/3, and 1/2 of AV/N(H) in the Milky Way (MW). (Color online)
Fig. 14.

Fitting parameters of AV/N(H) for (a) N44, (b) N79, and (c) N11 estimated from the linear regression of equation (2). Squares and triangles are the parameters of the D- and L+I-components, respectively. Black horizontal lines are 1/5, 1/3, and 1/2 of AV/N(H) in the Milky Way (MW). (Color online)

4 Result

4.1 Cumulative dust extinction map over the LMC

In figure 5, we show the AV(80%) map (i.e., near-total integrated dust extinction map) of the entire LMC field. The spatial resolution of the map is 5 with a grid size of 1.6. The uncertainty of the map [δAV(80%)] is shown in figure 6. The uncertainty is relatively large near the edge of the map due to low number densities of stars. In these maps, we mask the regions where we see failure in the read-out of the data or inappropriate zero point magnitude calibration.

We compare the AV(80%) map with the dust extinction map created by Dobashi et al. (2008) using the 2MASS catalog in figure 7. The spatial distribution of high AV regions such as the H i ridge region and N44 is consistent between the AV maps in figures 5 and 7. The AV(80%) map significantly detects dust clouds in N79 and around (α, δ)J2000.0 = (5h25m, −6615), which are not detected in the map of Dobashi et al. (2008). This is probably owing to the fact that the limiting magnitude of the IRSF catalog is three magnitudes deeper than that of the 2MASS catalog. We compare the AV map of this study and that of Dobashi et al. (2008) on a pixel-by-pixel basis and find a small but systematic difference in AV (0.3 mag), which can be seen especially in low hydrogen column density regions in figures 5 and 7. This is probably due to the difference in the method of estimating AV; we select RGB stars and use several intrinsic colors based on the spectral types of RGB stars, whereas Dobashi et al. (2008) did not classify stellar populations and used an intrinsic color averaged for stars of any spectral types and stellar populations in their reference field (i.e., extinction-free region). In the latter case, the AV values can vary depending on the spectral types and populations of the stars included in each observed field, and thus it is difficult to detect diffuse dust clouds. On the other hand, our dust extinction map is considered to detect diffuse dust clouds because the dust/gas ratio [AV/N(H)] of the D-component in our study is consistent with that of the LMC estimated from the previous studies as discussed in subsection 5.2.

In figure 5, we recognize that the dust extinction correlates well with the total hydrogen column density. Relatively high AV regions (AV > 1.0 mag) can be seen in the massive star-forming regions of the H i ridge, N44, N79, and N11. On the other hand, in the region where Tsuge et al. (2020) identify the diffuse L-component (hereafter the diffuse L-com region), no dust cloud is detected.

4.2 Cumulative dust extinction toward individual star-forming regions

In this section, to evaluate the 3D dust geometry and the dust/gas ratio of different velocity components in the massive star-forming regions of N44, N79, and N11, we investigate spatial correlation between AV and N(H) of different velocities. Figures 810 show the AV(10%) to AV(80%) maps of N44, N79, and N11, respectively. Since these maps show the dust extinction integrated from observers to X%, the dust extinction should increase with X%. We also present a comparison of AV(80%) with N(H) of different velocity components and dust emission of τ353 for N44, N79, and N11 in figures 1113, respectively.

The analysis area of each star-forming region shown in figures 810 is determined based on the areas for which Tsuge et al. (2019, 2020) investigate the spatial and velocity distributions of the H i clouds. Although they are larger than the H ii regions of N44, N79, and N11 defined in the Henize (1956) catalog, we adopt these analysis areas covering the L- and/or I-components existing around each

star-forming region to investigate the 3D dust geometry of different velocity components.

4.2.1 N44

From figure 11, we recognize that the dust extinction exhibits a good spatial correlation with N(H) of the D-component and τ353, which indicates that all the dust clouds in N44 are located in the LMC disk. On the other hand, we cannot see a clear spatial correlation between the dust extinction and the L- and I-components.

In order to statistically determine whether the AV counterparts of the L- and/or I-components are detected in the AV(80%) map, we apply the fitting with equation (2) to the AV(80%) map. Since N(H) of the L-component is low for a large area as shown in figure 11a, to improve the statistics, we newly define the L+I-component whose velocity range is −100 to −10 kms1 covering the velocity ranges of both the L- and I-components, and decompose AV into the L+I- and D-components. We first perform the fitting with the D-component alone [i.e., k = D in equation (2)]. In the next step, we add the L+I-components in the fitting (i.e., k = D and L+I). Here, the same XCO factor is assumed for the D- and L+I-components [i.e., xD = xL+I in equation (2)] because the CO emission of the L- and I-components (shown by white contours in figure 11) is detected in only a few areas and thus it is difficult to determine XCO of the L+I-component by the fitting. To judge whether the fitting is improved significantly, we perform an F-test with a confidence level of 95% corresponding to the F-test probability smaller than 0.05. As a result of the fitting, the ratio of χ2 to the degree of freedom (χ2/dof) is decreased from 84.51/166 (k = D) to 76.67/165 (k = D and L+I); the F-test probability is 6 × 10−5, indicating that the fitting is significantly improved by adding the L+I-component, and thus the L+I-component is significantly detected in the AV(80%) map.

To check the validity of introducing the L+I-component, we separate the L+I-component into the L- and I-components and perform the fitting with equation (2) using k = D, L, and I with the same XCO factor for the D-, L-, and I-components (i.e., xD = xL = xI). As a result, χ2/dof decreases from 76.67/165 (k = D and L+I) to 75.46/164 (k = D, L, and I); the F-test probability is 0.11, indicating that separating the L+I-component does not improve the fitting significantly, and thus it is reasonable to introduce the L+I-component.

To evaluate the 3D geometry of N44, we apply the fitting with equation (2) using the D- and L+I-components to each AV(X%) map for X = 10% to 80%. Table 1 shows the best-fitting parameters, while figure 14a shows AV/N(H) of the L+I- and D-components thus obtained as a function of X%. The uncertainties of the parameters are calculated by formal regression errors using the AV uncertainties of δAV(X%).

Table 1.

Fitting parameters estimated from the comparison of AV with N(H) for each velocity component in the star-forming regions of N44, N79, and N11.

ak  (AVN(H)) [10−22 mag/(H cm2)]xD (XCO)*
NamePercentileReduced χ2L+I-componentD-componentD-component
N44AV(10%)0.36−0.09 ± 0.260.54 ± 0.303.0 ± 4.6
AV(20%)0.640.09 ± 0.250.62 ± 0.282.5 ± 3.7
AV(30%)0.850.33 ± 0.250.95 ± 0.281.0 ± 2.0
AV(40%)1.010.61 ± 0.241.16 ± 0.270.9 ± 1.6
AV(50%)1.110.86 ± 0.251.50 ± 0.280.3 ± 1.2
AV(60%)1.091.05 ± 0.261.88 ± 0.29−0.3 ± 1.0
AV(70%)0.891.12 ± 0.262.26 ± 0.300.2 ± 1.0
AV(80%)0.461.11 ± 0.262.49 ± 0.301.5 ± 1.0
N79AV(10%)0.30−0.43 ± 0.431.37 ± 0.250.7 ± 1.9
AV(20%)0.60−0.05 ± 0.431.65 ± 0.251.3 ± 1.6
AV(30%)0.840.51 ± 0.452.06 ± 0.250.2 ± 1.2
AV(40%)1.011.38 ± 0.442.20 ± 0.240.6 ± 1.1
AV(50%)1.222.17 ± 0.432.27 ± 0.241.9 ± 1.2
AV(60%)1.342.48 ± 0.462.64 ± 0.252.0 ± 1.1
AV(70%)1.263.33 ± 0.502.62 ± 0.261.9 ± 1.1
AV(80%)0.713.30 ± 0.512.75 ± 0.282.9 ± 1.3
N11AV(10%)0.17−0.06 ± 0.350.14 ± 0.3140.3 ± 112.6
AV(20%)0.390.40 ± 0.630.45 ± 0.335.1 ± 11.0
AV(30%)0.600.65 ± 0.690.79 ± 0.343.5 ± 6.0
AV(40%)0.731.20 ± 0.761.10 ± 0.360.8 ± 4.1
AV(50%)0.991.48 ± 0.871.51 ± 0.38−0.8 ± 3.0
AV(60%)1.142.08 ± 1.031.73 ± 0.46−1.1 ± 2.9
AV(70%)1.092.28 ± 1.192.03 ± 0.54−0.1 ± 3.3
AV(80%)0.423.13 ± 1.142.09 ± 0.532.8 ± 3.3
ak  (AVN(H)) [10−22 mag/(H cm2)]xD (XCO)*
NamePercentileReduced χ2L+I-componentD-componentD-component
N44AV(10%)0.36−0.09 ± 0.260.54 ± 0.303.0 ± 4.6
AV(20%)0.640.09 ± 0.250.62 ± 0.282.5 ± 3.7
AV(30%)0.850.33 ± 0.250.95 ± 0.281.0 ± 2.0
AV(40%)1.010.61 ± 0.241.16 ± 0.270.9 ± 1.6
AV(50%)1.110.86 ± 0.251.50 ± 0.280.3 ± 1.2
AV(60%)1.091.05 ± 0.261.88 ± 0.29−0.3 ± 1.0
AV(70%)0.891.12 ± 0.262.26 ± 0.300.2 ± 1.0
AV(80%)0.461.11 ± 0.262.49 ± 0.301.5 ± 1.0
N79AV(10%)0.30−0.43 ± 0.431.37 ± 0.250.7 ± 1.9
AV(20%)0.60−0.05 ± 0.431.65 ± 0.251.3 ± 1.6
AV(30%)0.840.51 ± 0.452.06 ± 0.250.2 ± 1.2
AV(40%)1.011.38 ± 0.442.20 ± 0.240.6 ± 1.1
AV(50%)1.222.17 ± 0.432.27 ± 0.241.9 ± 1.2
AV(60%)1.342.48 ± 0.462.64 ± 0.252.0 ± 1.1
AV(70%)1.263.33 ± 0.502.62 ± 0.261.9 ± 1.1
AV(80%)0.713.30 ± 0.512.75 ± 0.282.9 ± 1.3
N11AV(10%)0.17−0.06 ± 0.350.14 ± 0.3140.3 ± 112.6
AV(20%)0.390.40 ± 0.630.45 ± 0.335.1 ± 11.0
AV(30%)0.600.65 ± 0.690.79 ± 0.343.5 ± 6.0
AV(40%)0.731.20 ± 0.761.10 ± 0.360.8 ± 4.1
AV(50%)0.991.48 ± 0.871.51 ± 0.38−0.8 ± 3.0
AV(60%)1.142.08 ± 1.031.73 ± 0.46−1.1 ± 2.9
AV(70%)1.092.28 ± 1.192.03 ± 0.54−0.1 ± 3.3
AV(80%)0.423.13 ± 1.142.09 ± 0.532.8 ± 3.3
*

The units are 1020cm2/(Kkms1).

Table 1.

Fitting parameters estimated from the comparison of AV with N(H) for each velocity component in the star-forming regions of N44, N79, and N11.

ak  (AVN(H)) [10−22 mag/(H cm2)]xD (XCO)*
NamePercentileReduced χ2L+I-componentD-componentD-component
N44AV(10%)0.36−0.09 ± 0.260.54 ± 0.303.0 ± 4.6
AV(20%)0.640.09 ± 0.250.62 ± 0.282.5 ± 3.7
AV(30%)0.850.33 ± 0.250.95 ± 0.281.0 ± 2.0
AV(40%)1.010.61 ± 0.241.16 ± 0.270.9 ± 1.6
AV(50%)1.110.86 ± 0.251.50 ± 0.280.3 ± 1.2
AV(60%)1.091.05 ± 0.261.88 ± 0.29−0.3 ± 1.0
AV(70%)0.891.12 ± 0.262.26 ± 0.300.2 ± 1.0
AV(80%)0.461.11 ± 0.262.49 ± 0.301.5 ± 1.0
N79AV(10%)0.30−0.43 ± 0.431.37 ± 0.250.7 ± 1.9
AV(20%)0.60−0.05 ± 0.431.65 ± 0.251.3 ± 1.6
AV(30%)0.840.51 ± 0.452.06 ± 0.250.2 ± 1.2
AV(40%)1.011.38 ± 0.442.20 ± 0.240.6 ± 1.1
AV(50%)1.222.17 ± 0.432.27 ± 0.241.9 ± 1.2
AV(60%)1.342.48 ± 0.462.64 ± 0.252.0 ± 1.1
AV(70%)1.263.33 ± 0.502.62 ± 0.261.9 ± 1.1
AV(80%)0.713.30 ± 0.512.75 ± 0.282.9 ± 1.3
N11AV(10%)0.17−0.06 ± 0.350.14 ± 0.3140.3 ± 112.6
AV(20%)0.390.40 ± 0.630.45 ± 0.335.1 ± 11.0
AV(30%)0.600.65 ± 0.690.79 ± 0.343.5 ± 6.0
AV(40%)0.731.20 ± 0.761.10 ± 0.360.8 ± 4.1
AV(50%)0.991.48 ± 0.871.51 ± 0.38−0.8 ± 3.0
AV(60%)1.142.08 ± 1.031.73 ± 0.46−1.1 ± 2.9
AV(70%)1.092.28 ± 1.192.03 ± 0.54−0.1 ± 3.3
AV(80%)0.423.13 ± 1.142.09 ± 0.532.8 ± 3.3
ak  (AVN(H)) [10−22 mag/(H cm2)]xD (XCO)*
NamePercentileReduced χ2L+I-componentD-componentD-component
N44AV(10%)0.36−0.09 ± 0.260.54 ± 0.303.0 ± 4.6
AV(20%)0.640.09 ± 0.250.62 ± 0.282.5 ± 3.7
AV(30%)0.850.33 ± 0.250.95 ± 0.281.0 ± 2.0
AV(40%)1.010.61 ± 0.241.16 ± 0.270.9 ± 1.6
AV(50%)1.110.86 ± 0.251.50 ± 0.280.3 ± 1.2
AV(60%)1.091.05 ± 0.261.88 ± 0.29−0.3 ± 1.0
AV(70%)0.891.12 ± 0.262.26 ± 0.300.2 ± 1.0
AV(80%)0.461.11 ± 0.262.49 ± 0.301.5 ± 1.0
N79AV(10%)0.30−0.43 ± 0.431.37 ± 0.250.7 ± 1.9
AV(20%)0.60−0.05 ± 0.431.65 ± 0.251.3 ± 1.6
AV(30%)0.840.51 ± 0.452.06 ± 0.250.2 ± 1.2
AV(40%)1.011.38 ± 0.442.20 ± 0.240.6 ± 1.1
AV(50%)1.222.17 ± 0.432.27 ± 0.241.9 ± 1.2
AV(60%)1.342.48 ± 0.462.64 ± 0.252.0 ± 1.1
AV(70%)1.263.33 ± 0.502.62 ± 0.261.9 ± 1.1
AV(80%)0.713.30 ± 0.512.75 ± 0.282.9 ± 1.3
N11AV(10%)0.17−0.06 ± 0.350.14 ± 0.3140.3 ± 112.6
AV(20%)0.390.40 ± 0.630.45 ± 0.335.1 ± 11.0
AV(30%)0.600.65 ± 0.690.79 ± 0.343.5 ± 6.0
AV(40%)0.731.20 ± 0.761.10 ± 0.360.8 ± 4.1
AV(50%)0.991.48 ± 0.871.51 ± 0.38−0.8 ± 3.0
AV(60%)1.142.08 ± 1.031.73 ± 0.46−1.1 ± 2.9
AV(70%)1.092.28 ± 1.192.03 ± 0.54−0.1 ± 3.3
AV(80%)0.423.13 ± 1.142.09 ± 0.532.8 ± 3.3
*

The units are 1020cm2/(Kkms1).

In table 1, many of the derived XCO factors of N44 for X = 10%–80% are not estimated significantly (i.e., XCO < 1σ, where σ is the uncertainty of XCO). This result indicates that AV counterparts of CO molecules are not detected in many of our AV maps. Actually, in the total integrated AV map [AV(80%)], the XCO factor is estimated significantly (XCO > 1σ). From table 1, we find that the AV/N(H) ratio at X = 80% for the L+I-component of N44 is lower than that for the D-component. Since XCO is known to depend on the metallicty (Bolatto et al. 2013), we need to check the validity of using the same XCO factor for the L+I and D-components in the fitting. Hence, by tentatively setting XCO for the L+I-component as a new free parameter independent of the D-component, χ2/dof is decreased from 76.67/165 (k = D, L+I with xD = xL+I) to 76.66/164 (k = D, L+I with xDxL+I); the F-test probability is 0.86, which means that the fitting is not improved significantly and using the same XCO for the L+I- and D-components does not affect our results. This is probably due to the fact that the CO emission of the L+I-component is detected in only small areas and thus it is difficult to detect the difference in XCO that is expected to be caused by the metallicity difference between the L+I- and D-components.

4.2.2 N79

In figure 12b, the D-component gas correlates well with the dust extinction map, although the right-hand side of the map is noisy due to the low number densities of the stars (figure 2). Dust emission τ353 also shows the spatial correlation with the dust extinction, indicating that all the dust is present in the LMC disk.

To check whether the AV counterparts of the I-component are detected significantly, we apply the same fitting procedure for N44 to the AV(80%) map of N79. By adding the L+I-component to the fitting with the D-component alone, χ2/dof is improved from 195.28/231 (k = D) to 163.66/230 (k = D and L+I). The F-test probability is 2 × 10−10, meaning that the fitting is significantly improved, and thus the AV(80%) map calls for the presence of the L+I-component. The parameters estimated from the fitting with the D- and L+I-components are summarized in table 1 and plotted in figure 14b.

From table 1, we find that XCO for N79 is not detected significantly at X=10%–40%, while it is detected with significance higher than 1σ at X=50%–80%, which indicates that AV counterparts of CO molecules are detected only at large X%. AV/N(H) at X=80% for the L+I-component of N79 is consistent with that for the D-component, and thus using the same XCO for the L+I- and D-components in the fitting is considered to be reasonable.

4.2.3 N11

From figures 13a and 13b, we recognize that dust clouds are detected in the regions where the D- and I-components are detected. In fact, by adding the L+I-component to the fitting with the D-component alone, χ2/dof is improved from 37.07/81 to 33.93/80; the F-test probability is 8 × 10−3 and again the AV(80%) map requires the presence of the L+I-component. In figure 13c, the dust extinction spatially correlates well with τ353, which indicates that all the dust exists in the LMC disk. We perform the same fitting to the AV(X%) maps of N11 as to those of N44. The derived fitting parameters are shown in table 1 and plotted in figure 14c.

From table 1, we recognize that the AV/N(H) ratio at X=80% for the L+I-component of N11 is consistent with that for the D-component within the errors, and thus using the same XCO factor for the L+I- and D-components is considered to be reasonable. All of the XCO values for X=10%–80% are lower than 1σ, which indicates that the AV counterparts of the CO molecules are not detected even in the AV(80%) map, or XCO cannot be estimated precisely by the fitting due to the large AV uncertainties.

4.3 Dust geometry for the diffuse L-com region

In the “diffuse L-com region” that is located in the west of N44 and marked in figure 5, Tsuge et al. (2020) find that there is no significant H ii region in the area where the L-component exists. They also find that there is no signature of deceleration of the L-component in the first moment map of the diffuse L-com region, and thus they suggest that the L-component in this region is located behind the LMC disk, and the gas collision is yet to occur. To verify this hypothesis, we evaluate the 3D geometry of this region.

In figure 15, we show the AV(80%) maps with N(H) of the L-, I-, and D-components and τ353. In figure 15a, we cannot see a clear spatial correlation between the L-component and the dust extinction. The D-component extends in this region and roughly correlates with the dust extinction in figure 15c, while the CO emission of the D-component (shown by white contours in figure 15c) does not correlate with the dust extinction, especially in the south of the map, which indicates that the molecular gas is located on the far side of the LMC disk.

Same as figure 11 but for the diffuse L-com region. Gray regions are masked for the fitting with equation (2). (Color online)
Fig. 15.

Same as figure 11 but for the diffuse L-com region. Gray regions are masked for the fitting with equation (2). (Color online)

To determine whether the AV counterparts of the L- and/or I-components are detected significantly, we apply the linear regression fitting to the AV(80%) map similarly to N44. Since the AV counterparts of molecular gas are not detected as mentioned above, we mask the regions in the AV map where the CO intensity is higher than 1.5σ and perform the fitting with equation (2) using only the H i data. By adding the L+I-component to the fitting with the D-component alone, χ2/dof is improved from 248.72/210 (k = D) to 230.11/209 (k = D and L+I); the F-test probability is 6 × 10−5, meaning that the AV(80%) map calls for the presence of the L+I-component. In addition, as in the study of N44, we separate the L+I-component into the L- and I-components and perform the fitting using k = D, L, and I. As a result, χ2/dof is decreased from 230.11/209 to 223.49/208. The F-test probability is 0.014, which means that the fitting is significantly improved by separating the L+I-component. The estimated parameters of AV/N(H) of the L-, I- and D-components for the AV(80%) map are (0.37±0.40, 2.63±0.67, and 2.70×0.38)×1022magcm2, respectively. AV/N(H) of the L-component is not detected significantly, which indicates that the L-component is located behind the LMC disk and does not contribute to the dust extinction. On the other hand, the I-component is significantly detected and contributes to the dust extinction. Such a difference between the L- and I-components results in an improvement in the fitting by separating the L+I-component.

To evaluate the geometry of the I- and D-components, we apply the fitting with equation (2) using N(H i) of the I- and D-components to each AV(X%) map. The estimated parameters of AV/N(H) are summarized in table 2 and shown in figure 16. AV/N(H) of the D-component monotonically increases with X%, indicating that the dust of the D-component extends along the line of sight. The AV/N(H) ratio of the I-component agrees with that of the D-component. Thus, the dust of the I-component is likely to be distributed similarly to that of the D-component. In summary, in the diffuse L-com region, the L-component is located behind the LMC disk, while the I- and D-components extend along the line of sight, which is consistent with the hypothesis that gas collision is yet to occur, as mentioned by Tsuge et al. (2020).

Table 2.

Same as table 1 but for the diffuse L-com region.

I-componentD-component
NameReduced χ2aI  (AVN(H))*aD  (AVN(H))*
AV(10%)0.510.27 ± 0.59−0.30 ± 0.36
AV(20%)1.00−0.01 ± 0.590.52 ± 0.37
AV(30%)1.390.34 ± 0.571.20 ± 0.35
AV(40%)1.650.93 ± 0.561.67 ± 0.35
AV(50%)1.811.71 ± 0.562.07 ± 0.35
AV(60%)1.982.19 ± 0.592.59 ± 0.37
AV(70%)1.692.62 ± 0.622.79 ± 0.37
AV(80%)1.072.89 ± 0.612.77 ± 0.38
I-componentD-component
NameReduced χ2aI  (AVN(H))*aD  (AVN(H))*
AV(10%)0.510.27 ± 0.59−0.30 ± 0.36
AV(20%)1.00−0.01 ± 0.590.52 ± 0.37
AV(30%)1.390.34 ± 0.571.20 ± 0.35
AV(40%)1.650.93 ± 0.561.67 ± 0.35
AV(50%)1.811.71 ± 0.562.07 ± 0.35
AV(60%)1.982.19 ± 0.592.59 ± 0.37
AV(70%)1.692.62 ± 0.622.79 ± 0.37
AV(80%)1.072.89 ± 0.612.77 ± 0.38
*

The units are 10−22 mag/(H cm2).

Table 2.

Same as table 1 but for the diffuse L-com region.

I-componentD-component
NameReduced χ2aI  (AVN(H))*aD  (AVN(H))*
AV(10%)0.510.27 ± 0.59−0.30 ± 0.36
AV(20%)1.00−0.01 ± 0.590.52 ± 0.37
AV(30%)1.390.34 ± 0.571.20 ± 0.35
AV(40%)1.650.93 ± 0.561.67 ± 0.35
AV(50%)1.811.71 ± 0.562.07 ± 0.35
AV(60%)1.982.19 ± 0.592.59 ± 0.37
AV(70%)1.692.62 ± 0.622.79 ± 0.37
AV(80%)1.072.89 ± 0.612.77 ± 0.38
I-componentD-component
NameReduced χ2aI  (AVN(H))*aD  (AVN(H))*
AV(10%)0.510.27 ± 0.59−0.30 ± 0.36
AV(20%)1.00−0.01 ± 0.590.52 ± 0.37
AV(30%)1.390.34 ± 0.571.20 ± 0.35
AV(40%)1.650.93 ± 0.561.67 ± 0.35
AV(50%)1.811.71 ± 0.562.07 ± 0.35
AV(60%)1.982.19 ± 0.592.59 ± 0.37
AV(70%)1.692.62 ± 0.622.79 ± 0.37
AV(80%)1.072.89 ± 0.612.77 ± 0.38
*

The units are 10−22 mag/(H cm2).

5 Discussion

5.1 Dust geometry of individual star-forming regions

In this section, we evaluate the dust geometry of N44, N79, and N11 from the estimated fitting parameter of ak [i.e., AV/N(H)] of each X%. We first consider the dust geometry of N44. The likely 3D dust geometry of the D- and L+I-components for N44 is illustrated in figure 17a. First, AV/N(H) of the D-component in figure 14a monotonically increases with X%, and thus the D-component is expected to extend along the line of sight as shown by a red rectangle in figure 17a, which is consistent with the general idea that the gas of the LMC disk is mixed with stars. AV/N(H) of the L+I-component is significantly detected from X = 30% onward, which indicates that the head of the L+I-component is located at X = 30%. In addition, AV/N(H) of the L+I-component is almost constant from X = 60% to 80%, indicating that there is little dust of the L+I-component beyond X = 60%. As a whole, the L+I-component in N44 is likely to extend from X = 30% to 60% as shown by a blue rectangle in figure 17a. The dust geometry suggests that the L+I-component is penetrating the D-component. This trend supports the idea that gas collision between the gas of the LMC disk and an inflow gas as seen in the L+I-component may have induced the massive star formation in N44 (Tsuge et al. 2019).

Same as figure 14 but for the diffuse L-com region. Circles are the fitting parameters of AV/N(H) of the I-component instead of the L+I-component shown by triangles in figure 14. (Color online)
Fig. 16.

Same as figure 14 but for the diffuse L-com region. Circles are the fitting parameters of AV/N(H) of the I-component instead of the L+I-component shown by triangles in figure 14. (Color online)

Side view of the expected dust geometry of (a) N44, (b) N79, and (c) N11. Red and blue rectangles denote the disk-velocity component (D-component) and the low+intermediate-velocity component (L+I-component), respectively. (Color online)
Fig. 17.

Side view of the expected dust geometry of (a) N44, (b) N79, and (c) N11. Red and blue rectangles denote the disk-velocity component (D-component) and the low+intermediate-velocity component (L+I-component), respectively. (Color online)

Similarly to N44, we discuss the 3D dust geometry of N79 and N11. In both regions, from the monotonic increase of AV/N(H) of the D-component with X% in figures 14b and 14c, the D-component is expected to extend along the line of sight as shown by red rectangles in figures 17b and 17c. AV/N(H) of the L+I-component is not detected significantly at X = 10%–20% and X =10%–30% for N79 and N11, respectively (see table 1), and thus the L+I-component is expected to extend beyond X = 30% for N79 and beyond X = 40% for N11 as shown by blue rectangles in figures 17b and 17c, respectively.

We compare the dust geometry of N44, N79, and N11 as well as the H i ridge region with the evolutionary stages of giant molecular clouds (GMCs) proposed by Kawamura et al. (2009). We summarize the positions of the L- or L+I-components and evolutionary stages of the relevant GMCs in table 3. The H i ridge region is separated into three regions based on the geometry of the L-component by Furuta et al. (2021). They define them as regions 1–3 from north to south; regions 1 and 2 contain 30 Dor and N159, respectively (see figure 14 in Furuta et al. 2021). The evolutionary stages are classified into four stages, Types I–III and the last stage in order from youngest to oldest. From the positions relative to the LMC disk of the L+I-component for N44, N79, and N11 in table 3, we recognize that the gas collision in these regions occurred later than in 30 Dor but occurred earlier than in region 3, which is consistent with the evolutionary sequences of the GMCs. The evolutionary stage of GMCs in N79 is earlier than those of N159, N44, and N11. However, we cannot see clear differences in the timing of gas collisions between these regions. This is likely to be caused by the large AV uncertainties, especially for N79 and N11, due to the low number densities of the stars.

Table 3.

Comparison of dust geometry of the L- or L+I-component with evolutionary stages of the related giant molecular clouds.

PositionEvolutionary
Name(L- or L+I-component)stage*
30 Dor (region 1 in H i ridge)front of the disklast stage
N159 (region 2 in H i ridge)X = 30% to 80%Type III
region 3 in H i ridgebehind the diskType I
N44X = 30% to 60%Type III
N79X = 30% to 80%Type II
N11X = 40% to 80%Type III
PositionEvolutionary
Name(L- or L+I-component)stage*
30 Dor (region 1 in H i ridge)front of the disklast stage
N159 (region 2 in H i ridge)X = 30% to 80%Type III
region 3 in H i ridgebehind the diskType I
N44X = 30% to 60%Type III
N79X = 30% to 80%Type II
N11X = 40% to 80%Type III
*

Kawamura et al. (2009).

Furuta et al. (2021).

Table 3.

Comparison of dust geometry of the L- or L+I-component with evolutionary stages of the related giant molecular clouds.

PositionEvolutionary
Name(L- or L+I-component)stage*
30 Dor (region 1 in H i ridge)front of the disklast stage
N159 (region 2 in H i ridge)X = 30% to 80%Type III
region 3 in H i ridgebehind the diskType I
N44X = 30% to 60%Type III
N79X = 30% to 80%Type II
N11X = 40% to 80%Type III
PositionEvolutionary
Name(L- or L+I-component)stage*
30 Dor (region 1 in H i ridge)front of the disklast stage
N159 (region 2 in H i ridge)X = 30% to 80%Type III
region 3 in H i ridgebehind the diskType I
N44X = 30% to 60%Type III
N79X = 30% to 80%Type II
N11X = 40% to 80%Type III
*

Kawamura et al. (2009).

Furuta et al. (2021).

In order to discuss the relationship between the timing of the gas collision and the evolutionary stages of GMCs quantitatively, we compare the crossing timescale of the gas collision with the transition timescale of the evolutionary stages. For example, from the comparison of the dust geometry of 30 Dor with that of N44, the head of the L+I-component is separated by the distance of the 30% percentile. Considering am LMC disk thickness of 2 kpc (Balbinot et al. 2015), this corresponds to 0.6 kpc. Assuming the velocity of the inflow gas (L-component) to be ∼100 km s−1 (Tsuge et al. 2020), it takes 6 Myr for the inflow gas to cross 0.6 kpc, which is consistent with the timescale of 7 Myr for the transition from Type III GMCs in N44 to the last-stage GMCs in 30 Dor (Kawamura et al. 2009). Therefore, our result can reasonably explain the difference in the evolutionary stages of the GMCs across the LMC.

5.2 Origin of massive star-forming regions

We discuss the origins of the massive star-forming regions of N44, N79, and N11 from the AV/N(H) ratio at X=80%. We summarize AV/N(H) for these regions as well as the H i ridge region in table 4. Furuta et al. (2021) find a difference of a factor of two in AV/N(H) between the D- and other components for the H i ridge region (see table 4). From the existence of the low-metallicity gas, they propose that the massive star formation in 30 Dor was triggered by galactic interaction between the LMC and the SMC.

Table 4.

AV/N(H) and XCO at X=80% of each velocity component for the H i ridge region, N44, N79, and N11.

L or L+I-componentI-componentD-component
NameaL  (AVN(H))*aI  (AVN(H))*aD  (AVN(H))*xD (XCO)
H i ridge1.24 ± 0.131.36 ± 0.172.08 ± 0.141.7 ± 1.0
N441.11 ± 0.262.49 ± 0.301.5 ± 1.0
N793.30 ± 0.512.75 ± 0.282.9 ± 1.3
N113.13 ± 1.142.09 ± 0.532.8 ± 3.3
L or L+I-componentI-componentD-component
NameaL  (AVN(H))*aI  (AVN(H))*aD  (AVN(H))*xD (XCO)
H i ridge1.24 ± 0.131.36 ± 0.172.08 ± 0.141.7 ± 1.0
N441.11 ± 0.262.49 ± 0.301.5 ± 1.0
N793.30 ± 0.512.75 ± 0.282.9 ± 1.3
N113.13 ± 1.142.09 ± 0.532.8 ± 3.3
*

The units are 10−22 mag/(H cm2).

The units are 1020cm2/(Kkms1).

Furuta et al. (2021)

Table 4.

AV/N(H) and XCO at X=80% of each velocity component for the H i ridge region, N44, N79, and N11.

L or L+I-componentI-componentD-component
NameaL  (AVN(H))*aI  (AVN(H))*aD  (AVN(H))*xD (XCO)
H i ridge1.24 ± 0.131.36 ± 0.172.08 ± 0.141.7 ± 1.0
N441.11 ± 0.262.49 ± 0.301.5 ± 1.0
N793.30 ± 0.512.75 ± 0.282.9 ± 1.3
N113.13 ± 1.142.09 ± 0.532.8 ± 3.3
L or L+I-componentI-componentD-component
NameaL  (AVN(H))*aI  (AVN(H))*aD  (AVN(H))*xD (XCO)
H i ridge1.24 ± 0.131.36 ± 0.172.08 ± 0.141.7 ± 1.0
N441.11 ± 0.262.49 ± 0.301.5 ± 1.0
N793.30 ± 0.512.75 ± 0.282.9 ± 1.3
N113.13 ± 1.142.09 ± 0.532.8 ± 3.3
*

The units are 10−22 mag/(H cm2).

The units are 1020cm2/(Kkms1).

Furuta et al. (2021)

The AV/N(H) ratio of the D-component at X =80% for the star-forming regions of N44, N79, and N11 is similar to that of the H i ridge region (see table 4). The resultant AV/N(H) ratio is nearly half of that in the Milky Way (5.34×1022magcm2 for RV = 3.1; Bohlin et al. 1978), which is consistent with the dust/gas ratio for the LMC of ∼1/2–1/3 of the Galactic value (Leroy et al. 2007; Roman-Duval et al. 2014). The XCO factors of the D-component at X=80% are consistent within the errors between all the star-forming regions shown in table 4, although the uncertainties are large, especially in N11. The resultant XCO factors for all the star-forming regions are similar to that of the LMC estimated from CO and [C ii] observations after correcting for the photodissociation of CO molecules due to UV radiation [XCO2.9×1020cm2/(Kkms1); Pineda et al. 2017].

On the other hand, AV/N(H) of the L+I-component significantly varies between the star-forming regions. For N44, AV/N(H) of the L+I-component is ∼1/5 of the Galactic value, which is similar to the dust/gas ratio for the SMC of ∼1/6 of the Galactic value (Roman-Duval et al. 2014). The existence of low-metallicity gas in the L+I-component in N44 supports the contamination of the inflow gas from the SMC, as proposed by Tsuge et al. (2019).

In N44, expansion of H i shell is reported (Kim et al. 1998). Around the shell, three episodes of massive star formation are found; one is the ∼10 Myr-old star formation inside the shell, another is the ∼5 Myr-old star formation on the shell rims, and the other is the YSOs (typically <1 Myr-old) (e.g., Oey & Massey 1995; Chen et al. 2009; Carlson et al. 2012). Tsuge et al. (2019) propose that the 5 Myr-old massive star formation was triggered by the galactic interaction between the LMC and the SMC as an alternative scenario of star formation triggered by the expansion of the H i shell from the existence of low-metallicity gas and signature of gas collision between the L- and I-components in addition to the lack of energy supply from the shell to explain the motions of the L-, I-, and D-components in N44. The age of the stellar population of N44 (∼5 Myr) is younger than that around the 30 Dor region of 8.1 Myr (Schneider et al. 2018), which agrees with the difference in the evolutionary stages of GMCs between N44 and 30 Dor (see table 3). Therefore, from the low AV/N(H) ratio of the L-component and the gas-colliding geometry in figure 17a, we suggest that the massive star formation around the shell rims in N44 was triggered by the galactic interaction between the Magellanic Clouds, similarly to the H i ridge region.

For N79 and N11, AV/N(H) of the L+I-component at X = 80% is nearly half of the Galactic value, which is similar to that of the D-component. According to the recent numerical simulations of the tidal interaction between the LMC and SMC (Tsuge et al. 2020), the gas currently falling on to the LMC disk as the L+I-component consists of gas from the LMC as well as from the SMC. We thus expect that in some places the metallicity will not be very different from that of the LMC, if the L+I-component is dominated locally by the LMC gas. In addition, an analysis of the dust/gas ratio based on the Planck dust emission of τ353 (K. Tsuge et al. in preparation ) indicates that the dust/gas ratio toward N79 and N11 is about two times larger than that in the H i ridge region and N44. This is consistent with the present results. It is therefore possible that the N79 and N11 regions were triggered by the L+I-component that originated in the LMC. We thus suggest that the trigger in the two regions was due to internal interaction, although the possibility of tidal interaction cannot be ruled out because the numerical simulation by Tsuge et al. (2020) suggests that part of the LMC gas is stripped off from the LMC disk in the interaction and then merges with the SMC gas to fall down to the LMC disk.

N79 is located at the intersection of the galactic bar-end with the spiral arm. Ochsendorf et al. (2017) suggest that the unique location may provide the gas accumulation and compression to create massive star formations. A similar case is reported for W 43, which is located at the intersection of the Galactic bar-end with the Scutum Arm. Kohno et al. (2021) find several velocity components with a velocity difference of ∼20 km s1 in W 43 and suggest that gas collision between them triggered the starburst. The velocity difference is similar to that between the D- and I-components in our study. Therefore, we suggest that the massive star formation in N79 was triggered by the collision of gas in the stellar bar with inflow gas from the spiral arm.

In N11, several OB associations are located at the periphery of a central cavity with a diameter of 170 pc evacuated by the rich OB association of LH9 (Lucke & Hodge 1970). Previous studies suggest that the OB association of LH10 located in the peripheral clouds was triggered by the expansion of the supershell blown by LH9 (e.g., Barbá et al. 2003; Hatano et al. 2006; Celis Peña et al. 2019). The expansion velocity of the supershell is estimated to be 20kms1 (Meaburn et al. 1989), which agrees with the difference in the velocity between the I- and D-components. The spatial distribution of the I-component is similar to the supershell structure (Tsuge et al. 2020). Using an I-component velocity of 30 km s−1, it takes 2.8 Myr for the I-component to travel the radius of the supershell (85 pc), which is similar to the 2 Myr age difference between LH9 and LH10 (Walborn & Parker 1992). Therefore, our results support the idea that the massive star formation of LH10 in N11 was triggered by internal interaction between the supershell and the surrounding ISM.

In summary, when N(H) of the L-component is detected significantly as in the cases of the H i ridge region and N44, AV/N(H) of the L+I-component is lower than that of the D-component. It is likely that the L+I-component originates from inflow gas from the SMC and the star formation is triggered by external interaction between the Magellanic Clouds. On the other hand, in the cases that N(H) of the L-component is not detected significantly, as in the cases of N79 and N11, AV/N(H) of the L+I-component shows fair agreement with that of the D-component. In these regions, internal interactions such as gas converging from the spiral arm and the expansion of a supershell are likely to trigger the massive star formation.

6 Conclusion

We derive a three-dimensional dust extinction map of the massive star-forming regions of N44, N79, and N11 in the entire LMC using the percentile method proposed by Furuta et al. (2021). Our total integrated dust extinction map calls for more abundant dust in the star-forming regions than the previous near-infrared dust extinction map constructed by Dobashi et al. (2008). From a comparison of the dust extinction with the hydrogen column densities of different velocity components, we investigate the three-dimensional geometry and the dust/gas ratio of the different velocity components for each star-forming region. Our main results are as follows:

  1. The dust geometry of N44, N79, and N11 suggests that the L+I-component is penetrating the LMC disk. Considering the present results together with the dust geometry of the H i ridge region estimated by Furuta et al. (2021), the difference in the timing of the gas collision agrees with the difference in the evolutionary stages of the giant molecular cloud related to each star-forming region (Kawamura et al. 2009).

  2. In the diffuse L-com region, the dust geometry indicates that the L-component is located behind the LMC disk. This geometry is consistent with the hypothesis that the gas collision is yet to occur in this region, as expected from the lack of a signature of deceleration of the L-component and the lack of massive stars (Tsuge et al. 2020).

  3. The AV/N(H) values and the XCO factors of the D-component at X=80% are almost the same for all the star-forming regions, while the AV/N(H) ratios of the L+I-component vary between them. For N44, AV/N(H) of the L+I-component is 1/5 of the Galactic value, which is similar to the dust/gas ratio for the SMC (Roman-Duval et al. 2014). From the low AV/N(H) ratio, we suggest that external interaction between the LMC and the SMC triggered the star formation in N44, similarly to 30 Dor in the H i ridge region.

  4. For N79 and N11, the AV/N(H) ratio of the L+I-component is 1/2 of the Galactic value, which is similar to that of the D-component. Thus, we suggest that the star formation in these regions was triggered by internal interaction although the possibility of the tidal interaction cannot be ruled out. We suggest that the massive star formation of N79 was triggered by a converging gas flow from the spiral arm based on the unique location of N79, while that of N11 was triggered by interaction between the expansion of a supershell and the surrounding ISM.

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Kazuhito Dobashi for kindly giving us the data for their AV map. We also thank the referee for giving us helpful comments. The IRSF project is a collaboration between Nagoya University and the SAAO supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (A) (Nos. 10147207 and 10147214) and the Optical and Near-Infrared Astronomy Inter-University Cooperation Program, from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan and the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa. This research was financially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows Grant Number 20J12119.

References

Allen
 
C. A.
 
2000
, in
Allen’s Astrophysical Quantities
, 4th ed., ed.
Cox
 
A. N.
(
New York
:
Springer
),
388

Balbinot
 
E.
 et al.  
2015
,
MNRAS
,
449
,
1129

Barbá
 
R. H.
,
Rubio
 
M.
,
Roth
 
M. R.
,
García
 
J.
 
2003
,
AJ
,
125
,
1940

Bekki
 
K.
,
Chiba
 
M.
 
2007a
,
MNRAS
,
381
,
L16

Bekki
 
K.
,
Chiba
 
M.
 
2007b
,
Publ. Astron. Soc. Australia
,
24
,
21

Besla
 
G.
,
Kallivayalil
 
N.
,
Hernquist
 
L.
,
van der Marel
 
R. P.
,
Cox
 
T. J.
,
Kereš
 
D.
 
2012
,
MNRAS
,
421
,
2109

Bessell
 
M. S.
,
Brett
 
J. M.
 
1988
,
PASP
,
100
,
1134

Bohlin
 
R. C.
,
Savage
 
B. D.
,
Drake
 
J. F.
 
1978
,
ApJ
,
224
,
132

Bolatto
 
A. D.
,
Wolfire
 
M.
,
Leroy
 
A. K.
 
2013
,
ARA&A
,
51
,
207

Cardelli
 
J. A.
,
Clayton
 
G. C.
,
Mathis
 
J. S.
 
1989
,
ApJ
,
345
,
245

Carlson
 
L. R.
,
Sewiło
 
M.
,
Meixner
 
M.
,
Romita
 
K. A.
,
Lawton
 
B.
 
2012
,
A&A
,
542
,
A66

Celis Peña
 
M.
,
Paron
 
S.
,
Rubio
 
M.
,
Herrera
 
C. N.
,
Ortega
 
M. E.
 
2019
,
A&A
,
628
,
A96

Chen
 
C.-H. R.
,
Chu
 
Y.-H.
,
Gruendl
 
R. A.
,
Gordon
 
K. D.
,
Heitsch
 
F.
 
2009
,
ApJ
,
695
,
511

Choudhury
 
S.
 et al.  
2021
,
MNRAS
,
507
,
4752

Diaz
 
J. D.
,
Bekki
 
K.
 
2012
,
ApJ
,
750
,
36

Dickey
 
J. M.
,
Lockman
 
F. J.
 
1990
,
ARA&A
,
28
,
215

Dobashi
 
K.
,
Bernard
 
J.-P.
,
Hughes
 
A.
,
Paradis
 
D.
,
Reach
 
W. T.
,
Kawamura
 
A.
 
2008
,
A&A
,
484
,
205

Fukui
 
Y.
 et al.  
1999
,
PASJ
,
51
,
745

Fukui
 
Y.
 et al.  
2008
,
ApJS
,
178
,
56

Fukui
 
Y.
,
Tsuge
 
K.
,
Sano
 
H.
,
Bekki
 
K.
,
Yozin
 
C.
,
Tachihara
 
K.
,
Inoue
 
T.
 
2017
,
PASJ
,
69
,
L5

Fukui Y. et al.  

2019
,
ApJ
,
886
,
14

Furuta
 
T.
,
Kaneda
 
H.
,
Kokusho
 
T.
,
Ishihara
 
D.
,
Nakajima
 
Y.
,
Fukui
 
Y.
,
Tsuge
 
K.
 
2019
,
PASJ
,
71
,
95

Furuta
 
T.
,
Kaneda
 
H.
,
Kokusho
 
T.
,
Nakajima
 
Y.
,
Fukui
 
Y.
,
Tsuge
 
K.
 
2021
,
PASJ
,
73
,
864

Gruendl
 
R. A.
,
Chu
 
Y.-H.
 
2009
,
ApJS
,
184
,
172

Hatano
 
H.
 et al.  
2006
,
AJ
,
132
,
2653

Henize
 
K. G.
 
1956
,
ApJS
,
2
,
315

Kato
 
D.
 et al.  
2007
,
PASJ
,
59
,
615

Kawamura
 
A.
 et al.  
2009
,
ApJS
,
184
,
1

Kennicutt
 
R. C., Jr.
 
1984
,
ApJ
,
287
,
116

Kim
 
S.
,
Chu
 
Y.-H.
,
Staveley-Smith
 
L.
,
Smith
 
R. C.
 
1998
,
ApJ
,
503
,
729

Kim
 
S.
,
Staveley-Smith
 
L.
,
Dopita
 
M. A.
,
Sault
 
R. J.
,
Freeman
 
K. C.
,
Lee
 
Y.
,
Chu
 
Y.
 
2003
,
ApJS
,
148
,
473

Kohno
 
M.
 et al.  
2021
,
PASJ
,
73
,
S129

Leroy
 
A.
,
Bolatto
 
A.
,
Stanimirovic
 
S.
,
Mizuno
 
N.
,
Israel
 
F.
,
Bot
 
C.
 
2007
,
ApJ
,
658
,
1027

Lucke
 
P. B.
,
Hodge
 
P. W.
 
1970
,
AJ
,
75
,
171

Meaburn
 
J.
,
Solomos
 
N.
,
Laspias
 
V.
,
Goudis
 
C.
 
1989
,
A&A
,
225
,
497

Ochsendorf
 
B. B.
,
Zinnecker
 
H.
,
Nayak
 
O.
,
Bally
 
J.
,
Meixner
 
M.
,
Jones
 
O. C.
,
Indebetouw
 
R.
,
Rahman
 
M.
 
2017
,
Nature Astron.
,
1
,
784

Oey
 
M. S.
,
Massey
 
P.
 
1995
,
ApJ
,
452
,
210

Pei
 
Y. C.
,
Fall
 
S. M.
,
Hauser
 
M. G.
 
1999
,
ApJ
,
522
,
604

Pietrzyński
 
G.
 et al.  
2019
,
Nature
,
567
,
200

Pineda
 
J. L.
 et al.  
2017
,
ApJ
,
839
,
107

Planck Collaboration
 
2014
,
A&A
,
571
,
A11

Roman-Duval
 
J.
 et al.  
2014
,
ApJ
,
797
,
86

Russell
 
S. C.
,
Dopita
 
M. A.
 
1992
,
ApJ
,
384
,
508

Schneider
 
F. R. N.
 et al.  
2018
,
A&A
,
618
,
A73

Seale
 
J. P.
 et al.  
2014
,
AJ
,
148
,
124

Tokuda
 
K.
 et al.  
2019
,
ApJ
,
886
,
15

Tsuge
 
K.
 et al.  
2019
,
ApJ
,
871
,
44

Tsuge
 
K.
 et al.  
2020
,

Valenti
 
E.
,
Ferraro
 
F. R.
,
Origlia
 
L.
 
2004
,
MNRAS
,
351
,
1204

van der Marel
 
R. P.
,
Cioni
 
M.-R. L.
 
2001
,
AJ
,
122
,
1807

Walborn
 
N. R.
,
Parker
 
J. W.
 
1992
,
ApJ
,
399
,
L87

Westerlund
 
B. E.
 
1997
,
The Magellanic Clouds
(
New York
:
Cambridge University Press
),
243

Whitney
 
B. A.
 et al.  
2008
,
AJ
,
136
,
18

Yozin
 
C.
,
Bekki
 
K.
 
2014
,
MNRAS
,
443
,
522

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)