Abstract

We present spatially resolved properties of molecular gas and dust in a gravitationally lensed submillimeter galaxy H-ATLAS J090311.6+003906 (SDP.81) at z = 3.042 revealed by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA). We identified 14 molecular clumps in the CO(5–4) line data. The surface density of molecular gas (⁠|$\Sigma _{\rm H_2}$|⁠) and star-formation rate (ΣSFR) of the clumps are more than three orders of magnitude higher than those found in local spiral galaxies. The clumps are placed in the “burst” sequence in the |$\Sigma _{\rm H_2}$|–ΣSFR plane, suggesting that z ∼ 3 molecular clumps follow the star-formation law derived for local starburst galaxies. With our gravitational lens model, the positions in the source plane are derived for the molecular clumps, dust clumps, and stellar components identified in the Hubble Space Telescope image. The molecular and dust clumps are confined within a ∼ 2 kpc region, while the spatial extent of the stellar components is as large as ∼ 6 kpc and offset toward the west. The molecular clumps have a systematic velocity gradient in the north–south direction, which may indicate a rotating gas disk. One possible scenario is that the components of molecular gas, dust, and stars are distributed in a several-kpc-scale rotating disk, and the stellar emission is heavily obscured by dust in the central star-forming region. Alternatively, SDP.81 can be explained by a merging system, where dusty starbursts occur in the region where the two galaxies collide, surrounded by tidal features traced in the stellar components.

1 Introduction

Deep and wide-field submillimeter surveys have uncovered dust-obscured star-forming galaxies at high redshift (referred to as submillimeter galaxies; SMGs—see, e.g., Blain et al. 2002 for a review). SMGs have intense star-forming activity with star-formation rates (SFRs) of a few 100–1000 M yr−1, which could be triggered by gas-rich galaxy mergers (e.g., Tacconi et al. 2006). SMGs and local ultra-luminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) are known to be on the same relation on the molecular gas mass–far infrared (FIR) luminosity plane (⁠|$M_{\rm H_2}$|LFIR) or molecular gas surface density–SFR surface density plane (⁠|$\Sigma _{\rm H_2}$|–ΣSFR), the so-called “burst sequence,” high above that of “normal” star-forming galaxies at local and z ∼ 1–3 universe (Daddi et al. 2010; Genzel et al. 2010). Spatially resolved observations of molecular gas in SMGs are essential to investigate the star-forming properties. However, only a handful of studies exist (e.g., Swinbank et al. 2010; Sharon et al. 2013; Rawle et al. 2014; Hodge et al. 2015) due to the limited spatial resolution and sensitivity of existing instruments.

Gravitational lensing is a powerful tool to probe the physical properties of distant galaxies in detail because of its magnification effect. The gravitational lensing caused by a foreground massive galaxy or cluster of galaxies has been used to probe dusty star-forming galaxies at high redshifts (e.g., Smail et al. 1997, 2002; Negrello et al. 2010; Vieira et al. 2013). Swinbank et al. (2010) discovered a z = 2.3 SMG (SMM J2135−0102) which is lensed by a z = 0.3 foreground galaxy cluster with the magnification factor of μ = 32.5, allowing them to examine the properties of the SMG at 100 pc scale.

H-ATLAS J090311.6+003906 (SDP.81) is one of the brightest sources discovered in the Herschel Astrophysical Terahertz Large Area Survey (HATLAS) (Eales et al. 2010). Multi-wavelength follow-up observations have shown that SDP.81 is an SMG at z = 3.042 ± 0.001 that is gravitationally lensed by a foreground massive elliptical galaxy at z = 0.2999 ± 0.0002 (Negrello et al. 2010, 2014). Corrected for the gravitational lensing magnification factor of μ = 11 (Bussmann et al. 2013), SDP.81 has an intrinsic FIR luminosity of LFIR = 5 × 1012 L and an SFR of ∼ 500 M yr−1. Recently, the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) observed SDP.81 at 1–2 mm in the Science Verification observations with an angular resolution up to 0|${^{\prime\prime}_{.}}$|03 (which corresponds to ∼ 200 pc at z = 3.042), offering an excellent opportunity to study the spatially resolved properties of an SMG.

In this Letter, we present the properties of SDP.81 revealed by the high angular resolution observations with ALMA. Throughout the paper, we adopt a cosmology with H0 = 72 km s−1 Mpc−1, ΩM = 0.26, and ΩΛ = 0.74, and 1″ corresponds to 7.78 kpc at z = 3.042.

2 Data

2.1 ALMA data

We used the calibrated data set publicly available through the ALMA Science Portal. The details of observations and data reduction are described in ALMA Partnership et al. (2015a) and ALMA Partnership et al. (2015b). SDP.81 was observed as part of Science Verification of the ALMA Long Baseline Campaign in 2014 October at Band 4 (151 GHz, or 2.0 mm), Band 6 (236 GHz, or 1.3 mm), and Band 7 (290 GHz, or 1.0 mm) with baseline lengths of ∼ 5–15 km and with 31–36 antennas.

The data were reduced with the Common Astronomy Software Applications (CASA: McMullin et al. 2007) package. The maps were processed with the CLEAN algorithm with the Briggs weighting (with robust parameter of 1.0). In this Letter, we used the Band 4 CO(5–4) line and the Band 7 1.0 mm continuum images without tapering the UV data at long baselines. The achieved synthesized beamsize (full-width at half maximum) is 0|${^{\prime\prime}_{.}}$|060 × 0|${^{\prime\prime}_{.}}$|054 and 0|${^{\prime\prime}_{.}}$|031 × 0|${^{\prime\prime}_{.}}$|023 for the CO(5–4) and 1.0 mm images, respectively. The images are shown in figure 1. Two arc structures in the east and west caused by gravitational lensing are clearly seen.

(a) ALMA CO(5–4) velocity-integrated intensity image. Molecular clumps identified in this study are presented. The synthesized beam is shown at the bottom left. Magnified figures (1${^{\prime\prime}_{.}}$2 × 1${^{\prime\prime}_{.}}$2) of (a-1), (a-2), and (a-3) are presented. (b) ALMA 1.0 mm continuum image. Dust clumps identified in Tamura et al. (2015) are shown as plus marks. The synthesized beam is shown at the bottom left. (c) HST/WFC3 1.6 μm image. Plus mark represents the position of the foreground lens galaxy detected in the ALMA 2.0 mm continuum image (ALMA Partnership et al. 2015b). (d) HST/WFC3 1.6 μm lens-subtracted image with contours of the ALMA 1.0 mm image (from +3 σ with 2 σ step). Plus mark represents the position of the foreground lens galaxy detected in the ALMA 2.0 mm continuum image. Crosses represent the positions of stellar components which we used for deriving source-plane positions. (Color online)
Fig. 1.

(a) ALMA CO(5–4) velocity-integrated intensity image. Molecular clumps identified in this study are presented. The synthesized beam is shown at the bottom left. Magnified figures (1|${^{\prime\prime}_{.}}$|2 × 1|${^{\prime\prime}_{.}}$|2) of (a-1), (a-2), and (a-3) are presented. (b) ALMA 1.0 mm continuum image. Dust clumps identified in Tamura et al. (2015) are shown as plus marks. The synthesized beam is shown at the bottom left. (c) HST/WFC3 1.6 μm image. Plus mark represents the position of the foreground lens galaxy detected in the ALMA 2.0 mm continuum image (ALMA Partnership et al. 2015b). (d) HST/WFC3 1.6 μm lens-subtracted image with contours of the ALMA 1.0 mm image (from +3 σ with 2 σ step). Plus mark represents the position of the foreground lens galaxy detected in the ALMA 2.0 mm continuum image. Crosses represent the positions of stellar components which we used for deriving source-plane positions. (Color online)

2.2 HST data

We made use of the archival data of HST/Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) taken by Negrello et al. (2014). We retrieved the calibrated, flat-fielded individual exposure frames of WFC3 with the F160W filter (H-band) from the archive, and then coadded them ourselves using the irafMultiDrizzle package. The final pixel scale was set to 0|${^{\prime\prime}_{.}}$|064 to improve the resolution and quality of the image. We calibrated the coordinates of the image using the catalog data from Data Release 12 of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS).1 We used 46 SDSS sources located in the image to derive the astrometric fit using iraf. The rms error to the fit is 0|${^{\prime\prime}_{.}}$|085 in right ascension and 0|${^{\prime\prime}_{.}}$|100 in declination. We checked that the coordinates of the foreground lens galaxy in the SDSS catalog match the coordinates of the continuum emission detected in Bands 4, 6, and 7 (ALMA Partnership et al. 2015b) within 0|${^{\prime\prime}_{.}}$|015. The offset between the center of the foreground lens and the ALMA continuum emission is smaller than the ALMA beamsize, showing the consistency of astrometry between the HST and ALMA images (figure 1c).

We used the software galfit (Peng et al. 2002) to deblend the background lensed source from the foreground lens galaxy. According to Negrello et al. (2014), two Sérsic profiles were simultaneously fitted to the foreground lens galaxy to cleanly subtract it. As a result, the brighter component of the foreground lens galaxy has the Sérsic index of n = 4.42 (elliptical), while the fainter component has the index of n = 1.03 (exponential). The profiles are consistent with those obtained by Negrello et al. (2014). The stellar arc structure seen in the lens-subtracted image shown in figure 1d is similar to the arcs seen in the ALMA CO line and continuum images, but they are clearly offset toward the west.

3 Lens model

The analysis of gravitational lensing was conducted by Tamura et al. (2015) using the glafic software package (Oguri 2010). The lens model was constructed by identifying the knots which were common in all three continuum images at 1.0, 1.3, and 2.0 mm. The lensed images are explained by the best-fit mass model with the mass profile of an isothermal ellipsoid with a 400-pc core. The core radius of the isothermal ellipsoid agrees well with that of the stellar light in the HST/WFC3 image, and the position of the predicted mass centroid is consistent with that of the emission detected in the ALMA continuum images. Tamura et al. (2015) found that the continuum emission has a power-law spectral index of −0.64 ± 0.1 from 1.0 mm to 20 cm, and it is likely that the non-thermal emission arises from an active galactic nucleus of the lens galaxy. This lens model is used to compute the positions on the source plane (subsection 5.2).

4 Molecular clumps

4.1 Clump identification

We identified molecular clumps by using the line cube (spectral resolution of 21 km s−1) and the velocity-integrated intensity map of CO(5–4). We first searched for the peak positions with ≥ 3.5 σ in the velocity-integrated intensity map created by including pixels above 1.5 σ in the line cube. We then used the clumpfind package (Williams et al. 1994) to search for clumps in the line cube. We identified 14 molecular clumps along the arcs detected by both methods (figure 1a). The positions, magnification factors, and mean velocities are shown in table 1. We caution here that the gravitational lensing can possibly produce two (or multiple) clumps in the image plane that are in fact the same clump in the source plane. However, because of the low S/N, it may be difficult to identify all of the multiples in the CO(5–4) image. We use the positions in image plane and source plane, and the mean velocities, as a guide to identify multiple images, and we suggest that clumps 1 and 13 and clumps 4 and 5 are possibly counter images of the same source.

Table 1.

Properties of molecular clumps.*

IDRAimageDecimageRAsourceDecsourceμmean§μmin§μmax§v  mean  |$^\Vert$||$\Sigma _{\rm H_2}$|  |$^\#$|ΣSFR**
(km s−1)(104M pc−2)(102M yr−1 kpc−2)
109:03:11.628+00:39:7.6309:03:11.558+00:39:06.4743.64.7−941.11 ± 0.333.80 ± 0.19
209:03:11.631+00:39:7.5609:03:11.556+00:39:06.4743.74.7−1651.19 ± 0.361.60 ± 0.20
309:03:11.636+00:39:7.6209:03:11.559+00:39:06.5364.96.6−781.13 ± 0.351.63 ± 0.20
409:03:11.662+00:39:7.2509:03:11.560+00:39:06.62> 10017> 1001181.09 ± 0.271.72 ± 0.15
509:03:11.671+00:39:7.0209:03:11.561+00:39:06.62> 10014> 1001071.04 ± 0.191.58 ± 0.11
609:03:11.672+00:39:6.7809:03:11.559+00:39:06.60261567921.12 ± 0.281.79 ± 0.16
709:03:11.661+00:39:5.7909:03:11.560+00:39:06.53> 10017> 100201.10 ± 0.361.53 ± 0.20
809:03:11.653+00:39:5.5709:03:11.562+00:39:06.50> 10012> 100−211.05 ± 0.161.19 ± 0.09
909:03:11.635+00:39:5.3909:03:11.560+00:39:06.54149.721401.12 ± 0.251.39 ± 0.14
1009:03:11.627+00:39:5.3909:03:11.558+00:39:06.6086.511291.08 ± 0.312.91 ± 0.17
1109:03:11.444+00:39:6.7709:03:11.558+00:39:06.5743.94.4921.04 ± 0.353.09 ± 0.20
1209:03:11.442+00:39:6.4409:03:11.557+00:39:06.4943.84.30.91.15 ± 0.272.94 ± 0.15
1309:03:11.445+00:39:6.3609:03:11.559+00:39:06.4744.04.4−901.16 ± 0.312.08 ± 0.18
1409:03:11.448+00:39:5.9909:03:11.558+00:39:06.3744.14.6−981.13 ± 0.321.39 ± 0.18
IDRAimageDecimageRAsourceDecsourceμmean§μmin§μmax§v  mean  |$^\Vert$||$\Sigma _{\rm H_2}$|  |$^\#$|ΣSFR**
(km s−1)(104M pc−2)(102M yr−1 kpc−2)
109:03:11.628+00:39:7.6309:03:11.558+00:39:06.4743.64.7−941.11 ± 0.333.80 ± 0.19
209:03:11.631+00:39:7.5609:03:11.556+00:39:06.4743.74.7−1651.19 ± 0.361.60 ± 0.20
309:03:11.636+00:39:7.6209:03:11.559+00:39:06.5364.96.6−781.13 ± 0.351.63 ± 0.20
409:03:11.662+00:39:7.2509:03:11.560+00:39:06.62> 10017> 1001181.09 ± 0.271.72 ± 0.15
509:03:11.671+00:39:7.0209:03:11.561+00:39:06.62> 10014> 1001071.04 ± 0.191.58 ± 0.11
609:03:11.672+00:39:6.7809:03:11.559+00:39:06.60261567921.12 ± 0.281.79 ± 0.16
709:03:11.661+00:39:5.7909:03:11.560+00:39:06.53> 10017> 100201.10 ± 0.361.53 ± 0.20
809:03:11.653+00:39:5.5709:03:11.562+00:39:06.50> 10012> 100−211.05 ± 0.161.19 ± 0.09
909:03:11.635+00:39:5.3909:03:11.560+00:39:06.54149.721401.12 ± 0.251.39 ± 0.14
1009:03:11.627+00:39:5.3909:03:11.558+00:39:06.6086.511291.08 ± 0.312.91 ± 0.17
1109:03:11.444+00:39:6.7709:03:11.558+00:39:06.5743.94.4921.04 ± 0.353.09 ± 0.20
1209:03:11.442+00:39:6.4409:03:11.557+00:39:06.4943.84.30.91.15 ± 0.272.94 ± 0.15
1309:03:11.445+00:39:6.3609:03:11.559+00:39:06.4744.04.4−901.16 ± 0.312.08 ± 0.18
1409:03:11.448+00:39:5.9909:03:11.558+00:39:06.3744.14.6−981.13 ± 0.321.39 ± 0.18

* ID 1 and 13, and ID 4 and 5 are possibly counter images of the same source.

Right ascension and declination of the ALMA peak positions in the image plane (J2000.0).

Right ascension and declination in the source plane (J2000.0).

§ Mean, minimum, and maximum magnification factors measured within the region of each clump.

|$^\Vert$| Mean velocity measured within the region of each clump.

|$^\#$| Molecular gas surface density.

** SFR surface density.

Table 1.

Properties of molecular clumps.*

IDRAimageDecimageRAsourceDecsourceμmean§μmin§μmax§v  mean  |$^\Vert$||$\Sigma _{\rm H_2}$|  |$^\#$|ΣSFR**
(km s−1)(104M pc−2)(102M yr−1 kpc−2)
109:03:11.628+00:39:7.6309:03:11.558+00:39:06.4743.64.7−941.11 ± 0.333.80 ± 0.19
209:03:11.631+00:39:7.5609:03:11.556+00:39:06.4743.74.7−1651.19 ± 0.361.60 ± 0.20
309:03:11.636+00:39:7.6209:03:11.559+00:39:06.5364.96.6−781.13 ± 0.351.63 ± 0.20
409:03:11.662+00:39:7.2509:03:11.560+00:39:06.62> 10017> 1001181.09 ± 0.271.72 ± 0.15
509:03:11.671+00:39:7.0209:03:11.561+00:39:06.62> 10014> 1001071.04 ± 0.191.58 ± 0.11
609:03:11.672+00:39:6.7809:03:11.559+00:39:06.60261567921.12 ± 0.281.79 ± 0.16
709:03:11.661+00:39:5.7909:03:11.560+00:39:06.53> 10017> 100201.10 ± 0.361.53 ± 0.20
809:03:11.653+00:39:5.5709:03:11.562+00:39:06.50> 10012> 100−211.05 ± 0.161.19 ± 0.09
909:03:11.635+00:39:5.3909:03:11.560+00:39:06.54149.721401.12 ± 0.251.39 ± 0.14
1009:03:11.627+00:39:5.3909:03:11.558+00:39:06.6086.511291.08 ± 0.312.91 ± 0.17
1109:03:11.444+00:39:6.7709:03:11.558+00:39:06.5743.94.4921.04 ± 0.353.09 ± 0.20
1209:03:11.442+00:39:6.4409:03:11.557+00:39:06.4943.84.30.91.15 ± 0.272.94 ± 0.15
1309:03:11.445+00:39:6.3609:03:11.559+00:39:06.4744.04.4−901.16 ± 0.312.08 ± 0.18
1409:03:11.448+00:39:5.9909:03:11.558+00:39:06.3744.14.6−981.13 ± 0.321.39 ± 0.18
IDRAimageDecimageRAsourceDecsourceμmean§μmin§μmax§v  mean  |$^\Vert$||$\Sigma _{\rm H_2}$|  |$^\#$|ΣSFR**
(km s−1)(104M pc−2)(102M yr−1 kpc−2)
109:03:11.628+00:39:7.6309:03:11.558+00:39:06.4743.64.7−941.11 ± 0.333.80 ± 0.19
209:03:11.631+00:39:7.5609:03:11.556+00:39:06.4743.74.7−1651.19 ± 0.361.60 ± 0.20
309:03:11.636+00:39:7.6209:03:11.559+00:39:06.5364.96.6−781.13 ± 0.351.63 ± 0.20
409:03:11.662+00:39:7.2509:03:11.560+00:39:06.62> 10017> 1001181.09 ± 0.271.72 ± 0.15
509:03:11.671+00:39:7.0209:03:11.561+00:39:06.62> 10014> 1001071.04 ± 0.191.58 ± 0.11
609:03:11.672+00:39:6.7809:03:11.559+00:39:06.60261567921.12 ± 0.281.79 ± 0.16
709:03:11.661+00:39:5.7909:03:11.560+00:39:06.53> 10017> 100201.10 ± 0.361.53 ± 0.20
809:03:11.653+00:39:5.5709:03:11.562+00:39:06.50> 10012> 100−211.05 ± 0.161.19 ± 0.09
909:03:11.635+00:39:5.3909:03:11.560+00:39:06.54149.721401.12 ± 0.251.39 ± 0.14
1009:03:11.627+00:39:5.3909:03:11.558+00:39:06.6086.511291.08 ± 0.312.91 ± 0.17
1109:03:11.444+00:39:6.7709:03:11.558+00:39:06.5743.94.4921.04 ± 0.353.09 ± 0.20
1209:03:11.442+00:39:6.4409:03:11.557+00:39:06.4943.84.30.91.15 ± 0.272.94 ± 0.15
1309:03:11.445+00:39:6.3609:03:11.559+00:39:06.4744.04.4−901.16 ± 0.312.08 ± 0.18
1409:03:11.448+00:39:5.9909:03:11.558+00:39:06.3744.14.6−981.13 ± 0.321.39 ± 0.18

* ID 1 and 13, and ID 4 and 5 are possibly counter images of the same source.

Right ascension and declination of the ALMA peak positions in the image plane (J2000.0).

Right ascension and declination in the source plane (J2000.0).

§ Mean, minimum, and maximum magnification factors measured within the region of each clump.

|$^\Vert$| Mean velocity measured within the region of each clump.

|$^\#$| Molecular gas surface density.

** SFR surface density.

If the clumps are spatially resolved with the ALMA beam, the transverse direction should be more extended than the radial direction. We found that some of the clumps do not appear to be extended in the transverse direction, and it is likely that they are unresolved. In order to measure the size of the clumps, higher angular resolution observations are needed.

The magnification of the four clumps close to the critical curve (ID 4, 5, 7, and 8) is large (> 100) and varies significantly within each clump. It is possible that they have properties with different physical scales compared to the other clumps, and we exclude these clumps in the discussion of star-formation properties. Except for the four clumps, the intrinsic spatial scale is roughly a few 100 pc in the source plane after correcting for the magnification factor and assuming that the clumps are spatially resolved.

4.2 Surface densities of molecular gas and SFR

We derived the surface density of the molecular gas and the SFR in order to investigate the intrinsic properties of SDP.81. We assume that there is no significant difference in the distribution of CO and dust emission within the measured region for each clump, and thus the effect of differential magnification (e.g., Blain 1999; Serjeant 2012; Hezaveh et al. 2012) is negligible. Because the distribution of molecular clouds or star-forming regions smaller than the beamsize is unknown, we assume a filling factor of unity in this study. We note that the filling factor might be less than unity if they are not spatially resolved.

We used regions above 2 σ in the CO(5–4) velocity-integrated map for conducting photometry and estimating the physical quantities of each clump. The photometry of the dust continuum was conducted on the 1.0 mm image in the same regions used for the CO photometry. The CO luminosity of each clump was calculated from |$L^{\prime }_{\rm CO} = 3.25 \times 10^7 S_{\rm CO}\Delta v \nu _{\rm obs}^{-2} D_{\rm L}^2 (1+z)^{-3}$| (Solomon & Vanden Bout 2005), where SCOΔv is the velocity-integrated intensity in Jy km s−1, νobs is the observed line frequency in GHz, and DL is the luminosity distance in Mpc. The error of SCOΔv is calculated by using the equation of Hainline et al. (2004). We used a CO line ratio of CO(5–4)/CO(1–0) = 0.3 (ALMA Partnership et al. 2015b). The molecular gas mass is derived from |$M_{\rm H_2} = \alpha _{\rm CO} L^{\prime }_{\rm CO(1-0)}$|⁠, where αCO is the CO-to-molecular gas mass conversion factor including He mass. We adopted a conversion factor of αCO = 0.8 M (K km s−1 pc2)−1, the standard value for ULIRGs (Downes & Solomon 1998). The FIR luminosity and dust mass were derived from |$L_{\rm FIR} = 4\pi M_{\rm dust} \int _0^{\infty } \kappa _{\rm d}(\nu _{\rm {rest}})B(\nu _{\rm {rest}}, T_{\rm dust}) d\nu$|⁠, and from |$M_{\rm dust}=S_{\rm {obs}}D_L^2/[(1+z)\kappa _{\rm d}(\nu _{\rm {rest}})B(\nu _{\rm {rest}}, T_{\rm dust})]$| (De Breuck et al. 2003), where κdrest) is the dust mass absorption coefficient, νrest is the rest-frame frequency, Tdust is the dust temperature, Brest, Tdust) is the Planck blackbody function, and Sobs is the observed flux density. We assume that the absorption coefficient varies as κd ∝ νβ and the emissivity index lies between 1 and 2 (e.g., Hildebrand 1983), and adopt κd(125 μm) = 2.64 ± 0.29 m2 kg−1 (Dunne et al. 2003) and β = 1.5. The dust temperature of Tdust = 39.3 K was derived by Negrello et al. (2014) for the integrated value of SDP.81, which is comparable to high-redshift ULIRGs and SMGs (e.g., Kovács et al. 2006; Symeonidis et al. 2013). We adopted the dust temperature for each clump. The SFR was derived from SFR = 1.72 × 10−10LFIR (Kennicutt 1998a). The derived surface densities of molecular gas and SFR are shown in table 1.

5 Discussion

5.1 Star-formation properties

The surface density of molecular gas and SFR for the molecular clumps are plotted in figure 2. The magnification varies with each clump, and a clump with a larger magnification traces an intrinsically fainter one. We reiterate that the magnification correction is not necessary when discussing the surface density of molecular gas and SFR, because the gravitational lensing conserves the surface brightness for the identified clumps. The molecular clumps of SDP.81 traced in this study have surface densities that are more than three orders of magnitude higher than those of local spiral galaxies, and they are similar to those of the ∼ 100 pc-scale clumps of the spatially resolved SMG SMM J21352 (Thomson et al. 2015). We note that the four clumps with high magnification (> 100; subsection 4.1) which are not presented in figure 2 share the same region with the other clumps. The SFR density ranges over 100–300 M yr−1 kpc−2, which is lower than the Eddington-limited star formation (maximum starburst; Elmegreen 1999; Rybak et al. 2015). It is known that local star-forming galaxies follow a relation in the |$\Sigma _{\rm H_2}$|–ΣSFR plane (the Schmidt–Kennicutt relation: Schmidt 1959; Kennicutt 1998a), and it is extended to include higher-redshift sources (e.g., Genzel et al. 2010). The clumps of SDP.81 are located in the “burst” sequence (Daddi et al. 2010) with a gas depletion time scale of ∼ 100 Myr, suggesting active star-forming activity in the clumps. If we adopt the Galactic conversion factor [αCO = 4.3 M (K km s−1 pc2)−1; Bolatto et al. 2013], these clumps are located on the sequence of normal star-forming galaxies. Note that if the filling factor is less than unity, the data points in figure 2 will shift to the upper-right direction. Regardless of the exact location of these clumps in the |$\Sigma _{\rm H_2}$|–ΣSFR plane, the derived |$\Sigma _{\rm SFR}/\Sigma _{\rm H_2}$| ratios are consistent with the values found in the Milky Way clumps (e.g., Heiderman et al. 2010; Evans et al. 2014), suggesting that the star-formation law can be applied to molecular clumps at z ∼ 3.

Molecular gas surface density–SFR surface density plot. The molecular clumps of SDP.81 are plotted as red circles. The vertical and horizontal dotted lines represent the 2 σ detection limit on the surface density of molecular gas and SFR, respectively, for a clump with a source size comparable to the beamsize. For comparison we also plot data points taken from the literature: Milky Way clouds (Heiderman et al. 2010; Evans et al. 2014), giant H ii regions in M 33 (Miura et al. 2014), local disk galaxies (Bigiel et al. 2010; Kennicutt 1998b), local starbursts (Kennicutt 1998b), z ∼ 1 – 2 star-forming galaxies (Tacconi et al. 2008), SMGs (Bothwell et al. 2010), and a spatially resolved lensed SMG SMM J21352 (Thomson et al. 2015). The solid, dashed, and dot-dashed lines represent gas depletion time scales of 10 Myr, 100 Myr, and 1 Gyr, respectively. If the filling factor is less than unity, the data points of SDP.81 shift to the upper-right direction.
Fig. 2.

Molecular gas surface density–SFR surface density plot. The molecular clumps of SDP.81 are plotted as red circles. The vertical and horizontal dotted lines represent the 2 σ detection limit on the surface density of molecular gas and SFR, respectively, for a clump with a source size comparable to the beamsize. For comparison we also plot data points taken from the literature: Milky Way clouds (Heiderman et al. 2010; Evans et al. 2014), giant H ii regions in M 33 (Miura et al. 2014), local disk galaxies (Bigiel et al. 2010; Kennicutt 1998b), local starbursts (Kennicutt 1998b), z ∼ 1 – 2 star-forming galaxies (Tacconi et al. 2008), SMGs (Bothwell et al. 2010), and a spatially resolved lensed SMG SMM J21352 (Thomson et al. 2015). The solid, dashed, and dot-dashed lines represent gas depletion time scales of 10 Myr, 100 Myr, and 1 Gyr, respectively. If the filling factor is less than unity, the data points of SDP.81 shift to the upper-right direction.

5.2 The nature of SDP.81

By using our lens model (Tamura et al. 2015) and the glafic software, we determined the positions of the molecular clumps on the source plane (figure 3). The clumps are distributed over a 2 kpc area, and they overlap with the dust clumps identified in Tamura et al. (2015). We also derived the source-plane positions for the brighter points of the stellar components shown as crosses in figure 1d. The points are selected so that the relative correspondence of the stellar components between the image plane and the source plane is easily visualized. The stellar components traced in this study are distributed over ∼ 6 kpc in the NE–SW direction, which is consistent with the result of Dye et al. (2014), and offset from the molecular gas and dust clumps toward the west. Since the lensing model of Tamura et al. (2015) includes the contribution from the stellar emission detected in the HST image, we argue that the extension of the stellar emission is real and not due to the lens model being based on the clumps of ALMA images. We note that, since the main aim of this study is to check the positional correlation between molecular gas/dust and stars, we only computed the position of the components marked in figure 1d, and the spatial extent of each component is not taken into account.

Positions in the source plane for the molecular clumps, the dust clumps, and the stellar components marked in figure 1. Velocity (top) and surface density (bottom) of the molecular clumps are indicated by color scale.
Fig. 3.

Positions in the source plane for the molecular clumps, the dust clumps, and the stellar components marked in figure 1. Velocity (top) and surface density (bottom) of the molecular clumps are indicated by color scale.

The mean velocity of each molecular clump measured in the image plane is shown in color in figure 3 (top). A velocity gradient with a peak-to-peak value of ∼ 300 km s−1 in the north–south direction can be seen, which could indicate a rotating gas disk. In figure 3 (bottom), the molecular gas surface density is shown in color scale. The molecular gas surface density appears to be higher in the central part of the molecular/dust “disk” and decreasing toward the edge, although the uncertainty is large.

What is the nature of SDP.81? One possible scenario is that the components of molecular gas, dust, and stars are distributed in a several-kpc-scale rotating disk, and the stellar emission is heavily obscured by dust in the central star-forming region. This is qualitatively consistent with the z = 4.05 SMG GN20, where an offset of a rest-frame UV-emitting region by 4 kpc from a region with CO and dust emission has been found (Iono et al. 2006; Hodge et al. 2015). Alternatively, SDP.81 may be a merging system, where dusty starbursts occur in the interface between the two colliding galaxies while the tidal features are widely extended. A similar large scale velocity gradient is seen in a recent ALMA CO(3–2) image of the Antennae Galaxies (Whitmore et al. 2014). The CO(5–4) line we used in this study has a relatively high critical density (105 cm−3) and it may not trace the gas of the entire disk. Future observations of the lower transition CO lines will allow us to study the detailed distribution and kinematics of the diffuse gas, providing further insights into the exact nature of SDP.81.

NAOJ Fellow.

We are grateful to Rie Miura and Alasdair Thomson for providing data. We thank the referee for helpful comments and suggestions. BH is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 15K17616 and the ALMA Japan Research Grant of NAOJ Chile Observatory, NAOJ-ALMA-0136. YT is supported by KAKENHI (No. 25103503). DI is supported by the 2015 Inamori Research Grants Program. YM is supported by KAKENHI (No. 20647268). MH is supported by Research Fellowship for Young Scientists from the Japan Society of the Promotion of Science (JSPS). MO is supported in part by World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI Initiative), MEXT, Japan and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the JSPS (26800093). This paper makes use of the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA#2011.0.00016.SV. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (USA), and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada), NSC and ASIAA (Taiwan), and KASI (Republic of Korea), in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO, and NAOJ. Data analysis was in part carried out on a common use data analysis computer system at the Astronomy Data Center, ADC, of the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.

References

ALMA Partnership
 et al.  
ApJ
 
2015a
 
808
 
L1

ALMA Partnership
 et al.  
ApJ
 
2015b
 
808
 
L4

Bigiel
F.
 
Leroy
A.
 
Walter
F.
 
Blitz
L.
 
Brinks
E.
 
de Blok
W. J. G.
 
Madore
B.
 
AJ
 
2010
 
140
 
1194

Blain
A. W.
 
MNRAS
 
1999
 
304
 
669

Blain
A. W.
 
Smail
I.
 
Ivison
R. J.
 
Kneib
J.-P.
 
Frayer
D. T.
 
Phys. Rep.
 
2002
 
369
 
111

Bolatto
A. D.
 
Wolfire
M.
 
Leroy
A. K.
 
ARA&A
 
2013
 
51
 
207

Bothwell
M. S.
 et al.  
MNRAS
 
2010
 
405
 
219

Bussmann
R. S.
 et al.  
ApJ
 
2013
 
779
 
25

Daddi
E.
 et al.  
ApJ
 
2010
 
714
 
L118

De Breuck
C.
 et al.  
A&A
 
2003
 
401
 
911

Downes
D.
 
Solomon
P. M.
 
ApJ
 
1998
 
507
 
615

Dunne
L.
 
Eales
S. A.
 
Edmunds
M. G.
 
MNRAS
 
2003
 
341
 
589

Dye
S.
 et al.  
MNRAS
 
2014
 
440
 
2013

Eales
S.
 et al.  
PASP
 
2010
 
122
 
499

Elmegreen
B. G.
 
ApJ
 
1999
 
517
 
103

Evans
N. J.
 
Heiderman
A.
II
 
Vutisalchavakul
N.
 
ApJ
 
2014
 
782
 
114

Genzel
R.
 et al.  
MNRAS
 
2010
 
407
 
2091

Hainline
L. J.
 
Scoville
N. Z.
 
Yun
M. S.
 
Hawkins
D. W.
 
Frayer
D. T.
 
Isaak
K. G.
 
ApJ
 
2004
 
609
 
61

Heiderman
A.
 
Evans
N. J.
II
 
Allen
L. E.
 
Huard
T.
 
Heyer
M.
 
ApJ
 
2010
 
723
 
1019

Hezaveh
Y. D.
 
Marrone
D. P.
 
Holder
G. P.
 
ApJ
 
2012
 
761
 
20

Hildebrand
R. H.
 
QJRAS
 
1983
 
24
 
267

Hodge
J. A.
 
Riechers
D.
 
Decarli
R.
 
Walter
F.
 
Carilli
C. L.
 
Daddi
E.
 
Dannerbauer
H.
 
ApJ
 
2015
 
798
 
L18

Hughes
D. H.
 
Dunlop
J. S.
 
Rawlings
S.
 
MNRAS
 
1997
 
289
 
766

Iono
D.
 et al.  
ApJ
 
2006
 
640
 
L1

Kennicutt
R. C.
Jr.
 
ApJ
 
1998a
 
498
 
541

Kennicutt
R. C.
Jr.
 
ARA&A
 
1998b
 
36
 
189

Kovács
A.
 
Chapman
S. C.
 
Dowell
C. D.
 
Blain
A. W.
 
Ivison
R. J.
 
Smail
I.
 
Phillips
T. G.
 
ApJ
 
2006
 
650
 
592

McMullin
J. P.
 
Waters
B.
 
Schiebel
D.
 
Young
W.
 
Golap
K.
 
Shaw
R. A.
 et al.
 
ASP Conf. Ser., 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI
 
2007
 
San Francisco
 
ASP
 
127

Miura
R. E.
 et al.  
ApJ
 
2014
 
788
 
167

Negrello
M.
 et al.  
Science
 
2010
 
330
 
800

Negrello
M.
 et al.  
MNRAS
 
2014
 
440
 
1999

Oguri
M.
 
PASJ
 
2010
 
62
 
1017

Peng
C. Y.
 
Ho
L. C.
 
Impey
C. D.
 
Rix
H.-W.
 
AJ
 
2002
 
124
 
266

Rawle
T. D.
 et al.  
ApJ
 
2014
 
783
 
59

Rybak
M.
 
McKean
J. P.
 
Vegetti
S.
 
Andreani
P.
 
White
S. D. M.
 
MNRAS
 
2015
 
451
 
L40

Schmidt
M.
 
ApJ
 
1959
 
129
 
243

Serjeant
S.
 
MNRAS
 
2012
 
424
 
2429

Sharon
C. E.
 
Baker
A. J.
 
Harris
A. I.
 
Thomson
A. P.
 
ApJ
 
2013
 
765
 
6

Smail
I.
 
Ivison
R. J.
 
Blain
A. W.
 
ApJ
 
1997
 
490
 
L5

Smail
I.
 
Ivison
R. J.
 
Blain
A. W.
 
Kneib
J.-P.
 
MNRAS
 
2002
 
331
 
495

Solomon
P. M.
 
Vanden Bout
P. A.
 
ARA&A
 
2005
 
43
 
677

Swinbank
A. M.
 et al.  
Nature
 
2010
 
464
 
733

Symeonidis
M.
 et al.  
MNRAS
 
2013
 
431
 
2317

Tacconi
L. J.
 et al.  
ApJ
 
2006
 
640
 
228

Tacconi
L. J.
 et al.  
ApJ
 
2008
 
680
 
246

Tamura
Y.
 
Oguri
M.
 
Iono
D.
 
Hatsukade
B.
 
Matsuda
Y.
 
Hayashi
M.
 
PASJ
 
2015
 
67
 
72

Thomson
A. P.
 
Ivison
R. J.
 
Owen
F. N.
 
Danielson
A. L. R.
 
Swinbank
A. M.
 
Smail
I.
 
MNRAS
 
2015
 
448
 
1874

Vieira
J. D.
 et al.  
Nature
 
2013
 
495
 
344

Whitmore
B. C.
 et al.  
ApJ
 
2014
 
795
 
156

Williams
J. P.
 
de Geus
E. J.
 
Blitz
L.
 
ApJ
 
1994
 
428
 
693