Abstract

Performance studies of large area inverted organic photovoltaic (OPV) modules of configuration ITO/ZnO/PTB7-Th: PC71BM/MoO3/Ag are performed. At a laboratory of scale 0.06 cm2, this device configuration repeatedly demonstrates the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of ∼9%, which is within the range of PCE normally achieved for this configuration. The OPV modules with active area of 9.25 cm2 and 63 cm2 are fabricated employing spin coating techniques comprising a total area 25 cm2 (5 cm × 5 cm) and 144 cm2 (11 cm × 11 cm), respectively. The 25 cm2 module, composed of five cells connected in series show PCE of 3.256%, with short-circuit current (Jsc), open circuit voltage (Voc), and fill factor (FF), 3.210 mAcm−2, 3.20 V, and 31.719%. However, The 144 cm2 modules, composed of 10 cells connected in series show PCE 1.019, Jsc, Voc, and FF, 0.87 mAcm−2, 4.20 V, and 27.877%. The PCE dropped by 63.89% for modules of active area of 9.25 cm2 and 88.68% of modules of active area of 63 cm2. The PCE of the modules is decreased sharply due to loss in FF, and Jsc of the modules. These losses are exhibits due to quality of layer morphology, layer interfaces, and design of module. The PCE could be potentially improved up to the desired value by the further optimization of layer morphology, layer interfaces, design of module geometry, and film deposition/printing methods. The results showed that PTB7-Th: PC71BM is a splendid structure for future organic solar modules due to its high performance and compatibility with large area coatings.

Introduction

The fast development, industrial growth, and extensive usage of electricity consuming devices across the globe demand energy reservoirs. However, extensive energy utilization causes the depletion of natural resources and increases global warming [1–4]. Solar energy is one of the most potential renewable energy resources, which can be utilized by directly converting it into electricity by employing photovoltaic technology [5–8]. Several photovoltaic technologies such as based on Silicon (Si), Cadmium Telluride (CdTe), and Copper Indium Gallium Selenide (CIGS) are competent to fulfill a significant fraction of this demand. However, these technologies showed hurdles due to high manufacturing process cost, manufacturing obstacles because of complex chemistry, and environmental concerns related to Cd in CdTe [9–13]. Organic solar cells (OSCs) technologies comprising donor and acceptor type of organic semiconductors intermixed to form bulk-heterojunction (BHJ) have potential to become an alternative photovoltaic technology because of cost-effectiveness, light weight, mechanical flexibility, and have the competence to manufacture on the large area [14–20]. There has been immense progress in BHJ organic solar cells. The PCE of BHJ organic solar cells has reached up to 18% [21] because of remarkable progress in donor/acceptor blend materials. However, these tremendous PCE of OSC devices would be noted with laboratory scale area (> 1 mm2). The transformation of laboratory scale area OSC devices to large area modules with stability and without significant loss in PCE exhibits several challenges. Particularly, the deposition of films accompanied by required morphologies over a large area, optimum designs of device structure, and appropriate processing techniques [22–24].

In the company of various blends employed in BHJ organic solar cells, those consist of Poly([2,6′-4,8-di(5-ethylhexylthienyl)benzo[1,2-b; 3,3-b]dithiophene]{3-fluoro-2[(2ethylhexyl)carbonyl]thieno[3,4-b]thiophenediyl}) (PTB7-Th) donor materials blended along with [6, 6]-phenyl C71-butyric acid methyl ester (PC71BM) acceptor have demonstrated magnificent PCE > 10% [25–27]. However, the PCE efficiency of these devices is reported for small scale device areas. On the other hand, this blend (PTB7-Th: PC71BM) of BHJ OSCs is not more investigated for large area modules. Hong et al. demonstrated a new module architecture for making large area modules of blend PTB7-Th: PC71BM BHJ OSCs and reported a high module efficiency of 7.5% with an area of 4.15 cm2 [28]. Barreiro-Arguelles et al. investigated the OSCs modules performance and stability with blend PTB7: PC71BM as a photoactive layer [29]. In this work, we extended our study of lab scale optimized OSC devices (0.06 cm2 and PCE of 9.0%) with an inverted structure of ITO/ZnO/PTB7-Th: PC71BM/MoO3/Ag to large area modules [27]. The organic solar modules based on the blend PTB7-Th: PC71BM are fabricated employing spin coating techniques. The OPV modules comprising 5 cells and 10 cells connected in series and possessing total active areas of 9.25 cm2, and 63 cm2 showed a PCE of 3.256%, and 1.019%, which in the future could be further improved by optimizing layer morphology and interface, and processing techniques. The study stimulated that the OPV modules based on PTB7-Th: PC71BM blend may be a promising candidate for the large area OSCs applications.

Experimental section

Materials

ITO coated glass substrates with a sheet resistance of 14 Ω/sq were purchased from Lumtec, Taiwan. Zinc acetate (99.99%), 2-methoxyethanol (99.8%), and ethanolamine (99.0%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Poly([2,6′-4,8-di(5-ethylhexylthienyl)benzo[1,2-b; 3,3-b]dithiophene]{3-fluoro-2[(2ethylhexyl)carbonyl]thieno[3,4-b]thiophenediyl}) (PTB7-Th) and [6, 6]-phenyl C71-butyric acid methyl ester (PC71BM) (PC71BM) were purchased from 1-Materials, Canada. 1,8-Diiodooctane was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Chlorobenzene used as a solvent in the device fabrication process was purchased from Alfa Aesar. All these commercially available materials were used as received without further purification [27].

Modules design, fabrication, and characterization

Schematic of inverted ITO/ZnO/PTB7-Th: BC71BM/MoO3/Ag OSC device structure and energy band diagram shown in Fig. 1a and b, which is followed for the fabrication of OPV modules. Inverted structure of OPV modules are fabricated on 5 cm × 5 cm and 11 cm × 11 cm ITO coated glass substrate. Schematic representation of cross-sectional view as well as design parameters of the 5 cm × 5 cm OPV module shown in Fig. 2a and b, it comprises 5 cells connected in series. Each cell has included the size of 5 cm in width and 3.7 cm in length and each cell is parted by 0.1 cm space. The total active area is 9.25 cm2. The OPV module is designed in series to obtain the output voltage. In a series of circuitry, each cell should be worked properly to complete the circuit of the module. Hereof, to get the maximum performance of the module film and interface uniformity of each cell is very important. Figure 2c shows the photograph of a 5 cm × 5 cm OPV module. Schematic representation of cross-sectional view as well as designs parameters of the 11 cm × 11 cm OPV module shown in Fig. 3a and b, it comprises 10 cells connected in series. One cell of the 10 cells have size of 0.9 cm in width and 10 cm in length and the other nine cells are comprised of a size of 0.6 cm in width and 10 cm in length and each cell is parted by 0.1 cm space. The total active area is 63 cm2. Figure 3c and d shows the photograph of 11 cm × 11 cm OPV module and metal mask for making interconnection, respectively. These designs are selected to perform the study of the given device structure (Fig. 1a) with active layer PTB7-Th: PC71BM. However, for commercial application purpose need to rethink for the design to get the maximum active area and performance of the module.

(a) Schematic of inverted ITO/ZnO/PTB7-Th: BC71BM/MoO3/Ag bulk heterojunction OSC Device. (b) Energy band diagram of bulk heterojunction OSC Device.
Figure 1.

(a) Schematic of inverted ITO/ZnO/PTB7-Th: BC71BM/MoO3/Ag bulk heterojunction OSC Device. (b) Energy band diagram of bulk heterojunction OSC Device.

(a) Schematic illustration of cross-sectional view of series-connected 5 cell of inverted OPV module (Module size: 5 cm × 5 cm). (b) Schematic representation of the module with length, width, and spaced parameters. (c) Photographs of 5 cm × 5 cm module.
Figure 2.

(a) Schematic illustration of cross-sectional view of series-connected 5 cell of inverted OPV module (Module size: 5 cm × 5 cm). (b) Schematic representation of the module with length, width, and spaced parameters. (c) Photographs of 5 cm × 5 cm module.

(a) Schematic illustration of cross-sectional view of series-connected 10 cell of inverted OPV module (Module size: 11 cm × 11 cm). (b) Schematic representation of the module with length, width, and spaced parameters. (c) Photographs of 5 cm × 5 cm module. (d) Metal mask for making interconnection.
Figure 3.

(a) Schematic illustration of cross-sectional view of series-connected 10 cell of inverted OPV module (Module size: 11 cm × 11 cm). (b) Schematic representation of the module with length, width, and spaced parameters. (c) Photographs of 5 cm × 5 cm module. (d) Metal mask for making interconnection.

5 cm × 5 cm and 10 cm × 10 cm pieces of ITO coated glass substrate were cut from a large piece of substrate. First, ITO coated glass substrates were patterned using the photolithography technique. The patterned substrates were ultrasonically cleaned in a boiled soap solution for 10 min, followed by rinsing and ultrasonication in DI water, acetone, and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) for 10 min, respectively, followed by drying with nitrogen. Patterned substrates were UV Ozone (UVO) treated for ∼ 20 min. For the preparation of ZnO films appropriate solutions were spin coated onto patterned ITO coated UVO treated glass substrates for 60 s at 2000 rpm followed by thermal annealing at 250°C for 10 min. Organic photoactive layer solution was prepared by dissolving PTB7-Th (10 mg) and PC71BM (15 mg) in chlorobenzene (970 μl) and 1,8-Diiodooctance (30 μl). The solution was stirred at room temperature for 8 h and then filtered using of 0.22 μm polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filter [27]. The deposition of active layer onto ZnO/ITO/glass substrate was performed by spin coating the solution at 2000 rpm for 15 sec (for the module size: 5 cm × 5 cm) and 800 rpm for 15 sec (for the module size: 11 cm × 11 cm) followed by thermal treatment on a hot plate at 40C for 2 h the in nitrogen glove box [27]. Finally, MoO3 film of 10 nm thickness to act as hole transporting layer (HTL) and Ag layer of 100 nm thickness as top metal electrode were thermally evaporated under high vacuum, respectively. The estimated active area of devices as defined by the overlap of the anode and cathode was 9.25 cm2 and 63 cm2. The current (I) – Voltage (V) characteristics of the OPV modules were measured in air using TriSolTM concentrated photovoltaic (CPV) solar simulator in the dark as well as under one sun illumination (simulated solar radiation of AM 1.5G spectrum) [27].

Results and discussion

The performance of OPV modules is affected by several factors such as high series resistance, effect of defective cells, and aperture ratio [30]. To examine the performance of organic photovoltaic (OPV) modules, we fabricated inverted structured modules with configuration Glass/ITO/ZnO/PTB7-Th: PC71BM/MoO3/Ag with device structure and energy band diagram [27] shown in Fig. 1a and b. The photovoltaic performance of OPV modules with two different active areas 9.25 cm2 and 63 cm2 comprising a total area of 25 cm2 and 144 cm2, under illumination of AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm−2 and under dark is shown in Fig. 4a and b. The photovoltaic performance of OPV modules with varying active areas is summarized in Table 1. OPV modules with an active area of 9.25 cm2 are characterized by the following average photovoltaic performance parameters (from three samples): short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 2.88 mA cm−2, open circuit voltage (Voc) of 2.85 V, fill factor (FF) of 0.30 and power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 2.53%. The OPV module with active area 63 cm2 shows short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 0.87 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 4.2 V, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.27, leading to PCE of 1.01%. As we observed (Table 1) the average photovoltaic performance of small active area (0.06 cm2) devices is comparable to the PTB7-Th: PC71BM blend based organic photovoltaic devices [27]. However, when the active area scaled up ∼154 times (to 9.25 cm2) and 1050 times (to 63 cm2), there is notable decrease in the PCE of OPV modules leading to an average value of 2.53% and 1.01% (Table 1). These values are approximately 27% (for 9.25 cm2) and 10% (for 9.25 cm2) of PCE value corresponding to devices with 0.06 cm2 active area (Fig. 5b). In the same way, the values of Jsc were reduced by approximately 15% and 4% (Fig. 5a), and FF values by approximately 49%, and 45%, respectively (Fig. 5b). The deficiency in PCE of OPV module with large active area is mainly concerned with the decrease in FF and Jsc. The main reason for the reduction of FF with increasing active area of the OPV modules is effective contribution of series resistance from ITO [31, 32]. However, the losses in current density (Jsc) are attributed to non-uniformity in morphology and thickness of the OPV modules with large area [32, 33]. Voc is not the function of the active area of the devices. The Voc of the OPV module is the addition of the subcells Voc. On the contrary, the Voc values of the increased number of subcells showed less advancement (Table 1 and Fig. 5a). The values of Voc are related to the junction properties of the donor and acceptor layers, and the work function of cathode and anodes [34–36]. The present study noticed that controlling the series resistance, uniformity in morphology and thickness across the entire active area is crucial to retain the higher efficiency demonstrated by small area devices.

(a) J-V curves of OSMs based on ITO/ZnO/PTB7-Th: PC71BM/MoO3/Ag inverted structure with active area 9.25 cm2 and 63 cm2 under illumination of AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm−2. (b) J-V characteristics curve of OSMs under dark condition.
Figure 4.

(a) J-V curves of OSMs based on ITO/ZnO/PTB7-Th: PC71BM/MoO3/Ag inverted structure with active area 9.25 cm2 and 63 cm2 under illumination of AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm−2. (b) J-V characteristics curve of OSMs under dark condition.

(a) Voc and Jsc curve with variation of active area. (b) PCE and FF curve with variation of active area.
Figure 5.

(a) Voc and Jsc curve with variation of active area. (b) PCE and FF curve with variation of active area.

Table 1.

Photovoltaic performance of OSCs devices based on ITO/ZnO/PTB7Th: PC71BM/MoO3/Ag structure with varying active area under the illumination of AM1.5G, 100 mWcm2.

Active Area
(cm2)
Voc
(V)
Jsc
(mAcm−2)
FF
(%)
PCE
(%)
Rs
(Ω cm2)
Rsh
(Ω cm2)
Ref.
0.060.80119.3 (19.0 ± 0.2)61.8 (61.0 ± 0.9)9.55 (9.31 ± 0.28)8.3333.3Usmani et al. [27]
9.253.20 (2.85 ± 0.312)3.210 (2.886 ± 0.359)31.719 (30.48 ± 1.081)3.256 (2.531 ± 0.641)57.87088.967
634.20.8727.8771.01932.59462.35
Active Area
(cm2)
Voc
(V)
Jsc
(mAcm−2)
FF
(%)
PCE
(%)
Rs
(Ω cm2)
Rsh
(Ω cm2)
Ref.
0.060.80119.3 (19.0 ± 0.2)61.8 (61.0 ± 0.9)9.55 (9.31 ± 0.28)8.3333.3Usmani et al. [27]
9.253.20 (2.85 ± 0.312)3.210 (2.886 ± 0.359)31.719 (30.48 ± 1.081)3.256 (2.531 ± 0.641)57.87088.967
634.20.8727.8771.01932.59462.35

Numbers in parenthesis represent the average value of 6 tested devices for 0.06 cm2, 3 tested devices for 9.25 cm2, and one device for 63 cm2. The values out of the parenthesis represent the device with the best performance.

Table 1.

Photovoltaic performance of OSCs devices based on ITO/ZnO/PTB7Th: PC71BM/MoO3/Ag structure with varying active area under the illumination of AM1.5G, 100 mWcm2.

Active Area
(cm2)
Voc
(V)
Jsc
(mAcm−2)
FF
(%)
PCE
(%)
Rs
(Ω cm2)
Rsh
(Ω cm2)
Ref.
0.060.80119.3 (19.0 ± 0.2)61.8 (61.0 ± 0.9)9.55 (9.31 ± 0.28)8.3333.3Usmani et al. [27]
9.253.20 (2.85 ± 0.312)3.210 (2.886 ± 0.359)31.719 (30.48 ± 1.081)3.256 (2.531 ± 0.641)57.87088.967
634.20.8727.8771.01932.59462.35
Active Area
(cm2)
Voc
(V)
Jsc
(mAcm−2)
FF
(%)
PCE
(%)
Rs
(Ω cm2)
Rsh
(Ω cm2)
Ref.
0.060.80119.3 (19.0 ± 0.2)61.8 (61.0 ± 0.9)9.55 (9.31 ± 0.28)8.3333.3Usmani et al. [27]
9.253.20 (2.85 ± 0.312)3.210 (2.886 ± 0.359)31.719 (30.48 ± 1.081)3.256 (2.531 ± 0.641)57.87088.967
634.20.8727.8771.01932.59462.35

Numbers in parenthesis represent the average value of 6 tested devices for 0.06 cm2, 3 tested devices for 9.25 cm2, and one device for 63 cm2. The values out of the parenthesis represent the device with the best performance.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the photovoltaic performance of PTB7-Th: PC71BM based large area OPV modules was studied when the active area was scaled from 0.06 cm2 to 9.25 cm2 and 63 cm2. PCE of the 5-cell and 10-cell modules were 2.53% and 1.01% with active area 9.25 cm2 and 63 cm2. These values were 27% and 10% of PCE value corresponding to devices with 0.06 cm2 active area. The present study noticed that controlling the series resistance, uniformity in the film thicknesses and morphology throughout the entire active area is crucial to retaining the higher efficiency demonstrated by small area devices. However, it is possible to reform preparation conditions and reduce series resistance from ITO to get better performance from PTB7-Th: PC71BM based OPV modules.

Data availability

The data underlying this article are available in the article.

Authors’ contributions

Belal Usmani (Conceptualization [lead], Data curation [lead], Formal analysis [lead], Investigation [lead], Methodology [lead], Visualization [lead], Writing—original draft [lead], Writing—review and editing [lead]), Rahul Ranjan (Conceptualization [Supporting], Data curation [supporting], Formal analysis [supporting]), Raju Kumar Gupta (Resources [supporting], Supervision [Supporting]), and Ashish Garg (Conceptualization [lead], Resources [lead], Supervision [lead], Validation [lead], Writing—review and editing [supporting]).

Conflict of interest statement: the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

Authors thank Department of Science and Technology for funding through India-UK APEX-II project, Newton Prize Funds, and EPSRC (UK) for funding through SUNRISE under GCRF call.

References

1

Abdmouleh
Z
,
Alammari
RAM
,
Gastli
A.
Review of policies encouraging renewable energy integration & best practices
.
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
2015
;
45
:
249
62
.

2

Lior
N.
Energy resources and use: the present situation and possible paths to the future
.
Energy
2008
;
33
:
842
57
.

3

Schnitzer
H
,
Brunner
C
,
Gwehenberger
G.
Minimizing greenhouse gas emissions through the application of solar thermal energy in industrial processes
.
J Clean Prod
2007
;
15
:
1271
86
.

4

Mekhilef
S
,
Saidur
R
,
Safari
A.
A review on solar energy use in industries
.
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
2011
;
15
:
1777
90
.

5

van der Staaij
FM
,
van Keulen
IM
,
von Hauff
E.
Organic photovoltaics: where are we headed?
Sol RRL
2021
;
5
:
1
8
.

6

Liu
S-Y
,
Perng
Y-H
,
Ho
Y-F.
The effect of renewable energy application on Taiwan buildings: what are the challenges and strategies for solar energy exploitation?
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
2013
;
28
:
92
106
.

7

Thirugnanasambandam
M
,
Iniyan
S
,
Goic
R.
A review of solar thermal technologies
.
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
2010
;
14
:
312
22
.

8

Aman
MM
,
Solangi
KH
,
Hossain
MS
et al.
A review of Safety, Health and Environmental (SHE) issues of solar energy system
.
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
2015
;
41
:
1190
204
.

9

Il Kwak
J
,
Nam
SH
,
Kim
L
,
An
YJ.
Potential environmental risk of solar cells: current knowledge and future challenges
.
J Hazard Mater
2020
;
392
:
122297
.

10

Kessler
F
,
Rudmann
D.
Technological aspects of flexible CIGS solar cells and modules
.
Sol Energy
2004
;
77
:
685
95
.

11

Lee
TD
,
Ebong
AU.
A review of thin film solar cell technologies and challenges
.
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
2017
;
70
:
1286
97
.

12

Polman
A
,
Knight
M
,
Garnett
EC
et al.
Photovoltaic materials: present efficiencies and future challenges
.
Science
2016
;
352
:
aad4424
.

13

Ramanujam
J
,
Singh
UP.
Copper indium gallium selenide based solar cells—a review
.
Energy Environ Sci
2017
;
10
:
1306
19
.

14

Hoppe
H
,
Sariciftci
NS.
Organic solar cells: an overview
.
J Mater Res
2004
;
19
:
1924
45
.

15

Yao
H
,
Chen
Y
,
Qin
Y
et al.
Design and synthesis of a low bandgap small molecule acceptor for efficient polymer solar cells
.
Adv Mater
2016
;
28
:
8283
7
.

16

Cheng
P
,
Li
G
,
Zhan
X
,
Yang
Y.
Next-generation organic photovoltaics based on non-fullerene acceptors/639/301/299/946/639/624/399 review-article
.
Nature Photon
2018
;
12
:
131
42
.

17

Hou
J
,
Inganas
O
,
Friend
RH
,
Gao
F.
Organic solar cells based on non-fullerene acceptors
.
Nat Mater
2018
;
17
:
119
28
.

18

Lee
C
,
Kang
H
,
Lee
W
et al.
High-performance all-polymer solar cells via side-chain engineering of the polymer acceptor: the importance of the polymer packing structure and the nanoscale blend morphology
.
Adv Mater
2015
;
27
:
2466
71
.

19

Clarke
TM
,
Durrant
JR.
Charge photogeneration in organic solar cells
.
Chem Rev
2010
;
110
:
6736
67
.

20

Cheng
Y-J
,
Yang
S-H
,
Hsu
C-S.
Cr900182S.Pdf
.
Chem Rev
2009
;
109
:
5868
923
.

21

Liu
F
,
Zhou
L
,
Liu
W
et al.
Organic Solar cells with 18% efficiency enabled by an alloy acceptor: a two-in-one strategy
.
Adv Mater
2021
;
33
:
1
8
.

22

Kang
NS
,
Ju
BK
,
Yu
JW.
Module structure for an organic photovoltaic device
.
Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells
2013
;
116
:
219
23
.

23

Tsai
PT
,
Yu
KC
,
Chang
CJ
et al.
Large-area organic solar cells by accelerated blade coating
.
Org Electron
2015
;
22
:
166
72
.

24

Lim
S-L
,
Ong
K-H
,
Li
J
et al.
Efficient, large area organic photovoltaic modules with active layers processed with non-halogenated solvents in air
.
Org Electron
2017
;
43
:
55
63
.

25

Kobori
T
,
Fukuda
T.
Effect of optical intensity distribution on device performances of PTB7-Th : PC 71 BM-based organic photovoltaic cells
.
Org Electron
2017
;
51
:
76
85
.

26

Wan
Q
,
Guo
X
,
Wang
Z
et al. 10.8% efficiency polymer solar cells based on PTB7-Th and PC 71 BM via binary solvent additives treatment.
Adv Funt Mater
2016
;
26
:
6635
6640
. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201602181.

27

Usmani
B
,
Ranjan
R
,
Kumar
S
,
Kumar
R.
Inverted PTB7-Th : PC 71 BM organic solar cells with 11.8% PCE via incorporation of gold nanoparticles in ZnO electron transport layer
.
Sol Energy
2021
;
214
:
220
30
.

28

Hong
S
,
Kang
H
,
Kim
G
et al.
A series connection architecture for large-area organic photovoltaic modules with a 7.5% module efficiency
.
Nat Commun
2016
;
7
:
10279
.

29

Barreiro-Argüelles
D
,
Ramos-Ortiz
G
,
Maldonado
J-L
et al.
Stability study in organic solar cells based on PTB7:PC71BM and the scaling effect of the active layer
.
Sol Energy
2018
;
163
:
510
8
.

30

Ã
RT
,
Bernkopf
J
,
Jia
S
et al.
Large-area organic photovoltaic module–fabrication and performance
.
Sol Energ Mater Sol C
2009
;
93
:
442
6
.

31

Xiao
X
,
Lee
K
,
Forrest
SR
et al. Scalability of multi-junction organic solar cells for large area organic solar modules Scalability of multi-junction organic solar cells for large area organic solar modules.
App Phys Lette
2016
;
106
:
213301
.

32

Jeong
W
,
Lee
J
,
Park
S
et al. Reduction of collection efficiency of charge carriers with increasing cell size in polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells.
Adv Fun Mater
2011
;
21
:
343
–34
7
. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201001578.

33

Agrawal
N
,
Zubair
M
,
Majumdar
A
et al.
Efficient up-scaling of organic solar cells
.
Sol Energ Mater Sol C
2016
;
157
:
960
5
.

34

Mihailetchi
VD
,
Blom
PWM
,
Hummelen
JC
et al. Cathode dependence of the open-circuit voltage of polymer : fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells.
J Appl Phys
2003
;
94
:
6849
6854
. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1620683.

35

Brabec
CJ
,
Cravino
A
,
Meissner
D
et al.
The influence of materials work function on the open circuit voltage of plastic solar cells
.
2002
;
404
:
368
72
.

36

Cheyns
D
,
Poortmans
J
,
Heremans
P
et al.
Analytical model for the open-circuit voltage and its associated resistance in organic planar heterojunction solar cells
.
Phys Rev B
2008
;
77
:
1
10
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.