Abstract

Background

Although recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) is recommended preferentially in adults aged ≥50 years in the United States, zoster vaccine live (ZVL) remains a recommended vaccine in immunocompetent adults aged ≥60 years and is currently being used in many countries around the world. Assessing the long-term effectiveness of both vaccines is critical for determining vaccine policy, including the optimal age to begin vaccination and the need for and timing of revaccination. We evaluated the long-term effectiveness of ZVL in adults ≥ 60 years old in the United States.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). The exposed cohort included KPSC members ≥60 years vaccinated with ZVL during 1/1/2007- 12/31/2014. Three unvaccinated members were matched to each vaccinated member on age, sex, and length of membership. Individuals were followed to 6/30/2017. Electronic health records were used to identify incident herpes zoster (HZ). The effectiveness of ZVL and its 95% confidence interval (CI) at each year following vaccination was estimated.

Results

The number of HZ cases was 7,783 in 923,176 person-years (8.4 per 1,000; 95% CI, 8.2–8.6 per 1,000) among vaccinated persons and 26,813 in 1,964,974 person-years (13.6 per 1,000; 95% CI, 13.5–13.8 per 1,000) among unvaccinated persons. The HZ incidence rate ratio, comparing the vaccinated to the unvaccinated, was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.60–0.63). The effectiveness by year after vaccination decreased each year of follow-up from 65.8% (95% CI, 63.2%-68.2%) in the first year, 49.3% (95% CI, 45.7%-52.6%) in the second, 32.0% (95% CI, 24.1%-39.1%) to 36.8% (95% CI, 32.3%-40.9%) in the third - sixth year, and 22.0% (95% CI, -2.5%- 40.6%) to 23.6% (95% CI, 13.4%-32.7%) in the seventh - 10th year. A similar pattern was seen between those 60–69 years and ≥70 years of age.

Conclusion

The effectiveness of ZVL declined from 66% in the first year to 22% in the 10th year after vaccination. This 10-year effectiveness study of ZVL provides insights into a revaccination strategy and need for a more effective and durable vaccine. Studies of long-term effectiveness of RZV are also warranted.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

Session: 244. Miscellaneous Vaccines

Saturday, October 6, 2018: 12:30 PM

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected]

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.