Abstract

Background. Successful treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa is thwarted by the emergence of antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation on prosthetic devices. Our aims were to decipher the molecular basis of resistance in a unique case of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) caused by MDR P. aeruginosa.

Methods. Five sequential MDR P. aeruginosa blood isolates collected during a 7-month period were recovered from a patient suffering from PVE previously exposed to β-lactam antibiotics. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of several classes of antibiotics were used to indicate clinical resistance characteristics; relatedness of the isolates was determined using multilocus sequence typing and repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction. Amplification and sequencing of regulatory and resistance genes was performed.

Results. All isolates belonged to ST 298, possessed blaPDC-16, and were resistant to fluoroquinolones and carbapenems. In the course of therapy, we observed a >2-fold increase in cephalosporin resistance (4 µg/mL to >16 µg/mL). Sequencing of the AmpC regulator, ampR, revealed a D135N point mutation in cephalosporin-resistant isolates. Common carbapenemase genes were not identified. All isolates demonstrated a premature stop codon at amino acid 79 of the outer membrane protein OprD and mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions of gyrA and parC. Point mutations in nalC, an efflux pump regulator, were also observed.

Conclusions. In this analysis, we chart the molecular evolution of β-lactam resistance in a case of PVE. We show that mutations in regulatory genes controlling efflux and cephalosporinase production contributed to the MDR phenotype.

Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is a potentially life-threatening complication of cardiac valve replacement surgery. The most common pathogens found to cause infective endocarditis (IE) are Gram-positive species, primarily Staphylococcus aureus, whereas endocarditis caused by Gram-negative species is less common and often attributed to HACEK organisms, which include the following: Haemophilus species, Aggregatibacter species, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, and Kingella species [1]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an extremely rare cause of PVE; a large international cohort study showed that the incidence is 0.4%, or 11 of 2671 cases [2]. Biofilm formation is also a distinguishing characteristic of P. aeruginosa that complicates treatment [3].

Molecular methods are extremely valuable in determining the etiology of IE and assist in clarifying the epidemiology and course of the disease, especially when repeated episodes of infection are caused by the same strain of species and can be defined as a relapse regardless of the length of time between infections [4]. Similarly, molecular analysis serves to uncover the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance that pathogens possess and that impact therapeutic success. Thus, understanding the molecular basis of the disease (applying precision medicine) can explain the clinical course and outcome of IE.

In this report, we sought to investigate the molecular basis of a persistent case of PVE due to P. aeruginosa. The case is unique as isolates characterized were collected serially during the course of treatment, occurring throughout 2 aortic valve replacements (AVRs). The different resistance profiles between early and late isolates, in addition to the patient's history of antibiotic therapy, assisted us in the understanding of the complex relationship between medical and surgical interventions and emergent antibiotic resistance.

Case Presentation

A 58-year-old woman treated with prednisone for Takayasu's arteritis and with a previous AVR (2007) presented to a Houston, Texas tertiary hospital initially in June 2010. She was hospitalized due to worsening shortness of breath. At that time, a transthoracic echocardiograph (TTE) revealed evidence of a prosthetic valvular incompetence, corroborated by the presence of torn cusps and severe aortic regurgitation. AVR surgery was performed. On postoperative day 24, P. aeruginosa bacteremia (isolate 7166; Table 1) was detected, and Achromobacter bacteriuria was present.

Table 1.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (µg/mL)

Isolate NumberIsolate IDDateAMKATMFEPCAZCIPIMPMEMLVXGENTZPCST
171667/28/10≤16≤8≤84>2>8>8>4>8≤162
329611/14/11≤16>16>16>16>2>8>8>4>8>641
479271/20/11≤16>16>16>16>2>8>8>4>8>641
586492/8/11≤16>16>16>16>2>8>8>4>8>6412
680962/19/1132>16>16>16>2>8>8>4>8>643
Isolate NumberIsolate IDDateAMKATMFEPCAZCIPIMPMEMLVXGENTZPCST
171667/28/10≤16≤8≤84>2>8>8>4>8≤162
329611/14/11≤16>16>16>16>2>8>8>4>8>641
479271/20/11≤16>16>16>16>2>8>8>4>8>641
586492/8/11≤16>16>16>16>2>8>8>4>8>6412
680962/19/1132>16>16>16>2>8>8>4>8>643

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were interpreted according to 2015 Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria for Pseudomonas aeruginosa: for aztreonam (ATM), cefepime (FEP), and ceftazidime (CAZ), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤ 8 is susceptible (S), MIC = 16 is intermediate (I), and MIC ≥ 32 is resistant (R); for meropenem (MEM), imipenem (IMP), levofloxacin (LVX), and colistin (CST), MIC ≤ 2 is S, MIC = 4 is I, MIC ≥ 8 is R; for amikacin (AMK), MIC ≤ 16 is S, MIC = 32 is I, and MIC ≥ 64 is R; for ciprofloxacin (CIP), MIC ≤ 1 is S, MIC = 2 is I, MIC ≥ 4 is R MIC; for gentamicin (GEN), MIC ≤ 4 is S, MIC = 8 is I, MIC ≥ 16 is R; for piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), MIC ≤ 16 is S, MIC = 32–64 is I, MIC ≥ 128 is R.

Table 1.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (µg/mL)

Isolate NumberIsolate IDDateAMKATMFEPCAZCIPIMPMEMLVXGENTZPCST
171667/28/10≤16≤8≤84>2>8>8>4>8≤162
329611/14/11≤16>16>16>16>2>8>8>4>8>641
479271/20/11≤16>16>16>16>2>8>8>4>8>641
586492/8/11≤16>16>16>16>2>8>8>4>8>6412
680962/19/1132>16>16>16>2>8>8>4>8>643
Isolate NumberIsolate IDDateAMKATMFEPCAZCIPIMPMEMLVXGENTZPCST
171667/28/10≤16≤8≤84>2>8>8>4>8≤162
329611/14/11≤16>16>16>16>2>8>8>4>8>641
479271/20/11≤16>16>16>16>2>8>8>4>8>641
586492/8/11≤16>16>16>16>2>8>8>4>8>6412
680962/19/1132>16>16>16>2>8>8>4>8>643

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were interpreted according to 2015 Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria for Pseudomonas aeruginosa: for aztreonam (ATM), cefepime (FEP), and ceftazidime (CAZ), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤ 8 is susceptible (S), MIC = 16 is intermediate (I), and MIC ≥ 32 is resistant (R); for meropenem (MEM), imipenem (IMP), levofloxacin (LVX), and colistin (CST), MIC ≤ 2 is S, MIC = 4 is I, MIC ≥ 8 is R; for amikacin (AMK), MIC ≤ 16 is S, MIC = 32 is I, and MIC ≥ 64 is R; for ciprofloxacin (CIP), MIC ≤ 1 is S, MIC = 2 is I, MIC ≥ 4 is R MIC; for gentamicin (GEN), MIC ≤ 4 is S, MIC = 8 is I, MIC ≥ 16 is R; for piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), MIC ≤ 16 is S, MIC = 32–64 is I, MIC ≥ 128 is R.

Initially, a treatment regimen (Figure 1) was started for the bloodstream infection and urinary tract infection with meropenem (Table 1; isolate 1, ID 7166 was meropenem and imipenem resistant) but changed to ceftazidime when laboratory susceptibility data were determined. The patient improved clinically and was discharged but returned to an outside care facility 1 month later with persistent fever. Blood cultures yielded P. aeruginosa, and a TTE showed evidence of aortic regurgitation (isolate not available for further study). Meropenem, amikacin, and eventually piperacillin/tazobactam therapy were prescribed, and the patient was then discharged after 2 weeks of treatment.
Timeline of antibiotic therapy, bacterial cultures, and patient health information. ?, Treated at outside hospital, unclear details; *, Isolate 2 recoved at outside hospital, not included in analysis.
Figure 1.

Timeline of antibiotic therapy, bacterial cultures, and patient health information. ?, Treated at outside hospital, unclear details; *, Isolate 2 recoved at outside hospital, not included in analysis.

The patient returned to the tertiary hospital in Houston, Texas, in January 2011 with recurrent fever and dyspnea of 1 month duration. Her cultures again grew P. aeruginosa (isolate 2961; Table 1). Piperacillin/tazobactam therapy was started based upon previous susceptibilities. This regimen changed to colistin, rifampin, and high-dose, prolonged infusion meropenem once susceptibility data were determined during admission. The patient's blood cultures cleared, but TTE showed evidence of aortic regurgitation. Subsequently, the patient was found to have dehiscence of the new valve and underwent a third aortic valve replacement with homograft placed 215 days after the second AVR. Despite ongoing antibiotics (including the addition of amikacin), the bacteremia persisted until postoperative day 16 after the addition of doxycycline to meropenem and colistin. Antibiotics were stopped after 8 weeks of PVE treatment, which lead to microbiological resolution.

During the course of treatment, 6 sequential P. aeruginosa blood isolates were collected, 1 of which was not included in this analysis because it was obtained while the patient was in an outside care facility and was not available for further analysis. The date of each isolate collection, relevant to the timeline of antibiotic therapy and patient health information, is detailed in Figure 1. The 5 isolates of interest were analyzed to understand the molecular mechanisms behind the observed clinical presentation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Genotypic Analysis

Herein, we analyze a complicated case of PVE caused by MDR P. aeruginosa, where resistance to cephalosporins and aztreonam emerged while on therapy. This is one of a few studies where the genetic backgrounds of multiple isolates of P. aeruginosa collected from the same patient during a period of 7 months were analyzed to explain the resistance phenotype and correlate with the course of infection.

Susceptibility testing to antibiotics was performed using the MicroScan System (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY) and interpreted according to the 2015 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines for P. aeruginosa. American Type Culture Collection control strains P. aeruginosa 27853 and E. coli 25922 were used as control strains. Colistin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by Etest. All isolates were resistant to carbapenems and fluoroquinolones [ciprofloxacin (MIC >2 µg/mL), meropenem, and imipenem (MICs >8 µg/mL)]. Whereas the initial isolate was susceptible to aztreonam (ATM; MIC of ≤8 mg/mL), cefepime (FEP; MIC of 8 µg/mL), and ceftazidime (CAZ; MIC of 4 µg/mL), subsequent isolates were resistant (MIC >16 µg/mL) (Table 1). There was a clinically important change in this susceptibility (ie, CAZ, ATM, and FEP, from susceptible to resistant) during the 7 months isolates were collected.

β-lactamase genetic amplification and detection was performed using the CT103 kit produced by Check-Points B.V. (Wageningen, The Netherlands) This is a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based DNA microarray method for detecting the following β-lactamase (bla) genes: blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA-48, blaVIM, and blaIMP (carbapenemases). Additionally, this method detects extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes and AmpC genes: blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX-M, blaCMY, blaDHA, blaFOX, blaMOX, blaACC, blaMIR, and blaACT. For blaTEM and blaSHV, the assay method allows for distinction between ESBL and non-ESBL variants that exist within an isolate. Briefly, genomic DNA was extracted from bacterial colonies grown overnight using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA). Microarray assays were performed generating templates of the target DNA sequence that were amplified and hybridized, detected by the microarray reader, and interpreted using software supplied by the manufacturer. The panel of β-lactamases that are detected by the microarray are optimized for Enterobacteriaceae. The performance of this kit using P. aeruginosa is being explored and tested. We emphasize that carbapenemase genes were not detected.

PCR amplifications of genes involved in resistance to cephalosporins (ie, ampD, ampR, blaPDC, and dacB), resistance to fluoroquinolones (ie, gyrA, gyrB, parC, parE), other mechanisms of resistance to carbapenems (oprD), and regulation of efflux pumps (ie, nalB (mexR), nalC, nalD, PA5471, and mexZ) were also performed using the primers and methodology described by Cabot et al [5]. Amplicons obtained using primers for the above resistance genes were sequenced at a commercial sequencing facility (MCLAB, South San Francisco, CA). Generated sequences were analyzed using DNAstar SeqMan Pro software (Madison, WI). Generated sequences were then compared with BLAST online software (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), or translated in ExPASy (http://web.expasy.org/translate/), then aligned using ClustalX software (www.clustal.org) to determine DNA mutations that resulted in amino acid mutations.

Cephalosporin Resistance

D135N mutations in ampR, which upregulates AmpC expression in Enterobacter cloacae [6], were present in all isolates analyzed, with the exception of the first isolate (7166; Table 2). Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase (PDC) is the chromosomally encoded class C cephalosporinase in P. aeruginosa and is often responsible for high-level resistance to advanced generation cephalosporins such as ceftazidime. Expression of the PDC cephalosporinase was assessed in the 5 isolates. Preparation of samples, immunoblotting, and recognition of PDC expression was performed as previously reported [7]. Increased expression of PDC-16 was observed in all isolates with the D135N mutation in the ampR gene (Figure 2.) There were also other mutations of note relative to wild-type/reference strain PA01 that are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.

Summary of Mutations

Isolate NumberIsolate IDAmpCPDC SubstitutionsAmpC Regulators
QRDRs
AmpD and DacBAmpRGyrAGyrBParCParE
PA01ST TypePDC-1WTWTWTWTWTWTWT
17166298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
32961298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, D135N, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
47927298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, D135N, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
58649298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, D135N, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
68096298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, D135N, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
Isolate NumberIsolate IDAmpCPDC SubstitutionsAmpC Regulators
QRDRs
AmpD and DacBAmpRGyrAGyrBParCParE
PA01ST TypePDC-1WTWTWTWTWTWTWT
17166298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
32961298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, D135N, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
47927298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, D135N, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
58649298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, D135N, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
68096298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, D135N, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
OMP
MexAB-OprM regulators
MexXY-OprM regulators
Isolate IDOprDNalB (MexR)NalCNalDPA5471MexZ
Isolate NumberPA01WTWTWTWTWTWT
17166Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
32961Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
47927Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
58649Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
68096Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
OMP
MexAB-OprM regulators
MexXY-OprM regulators
Isolate IDOprDNalB (MexR)NalCNalDPA5471MexZ
Isolate NumberPA01WTWTWTWTWTWT
17166Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
32961Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
47927Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
58649Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
68096Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT

Reference wild-type comparator amino acid sequences from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01 isolate listed in Table 2 are as follows:

PDC-1, ACQ82807; AmpD, AAG07910; DacB, NP_251737; AmpR, AAG07496; GyrA, AAG06556; GyrB, AAG03394; ParC, NP_253651; ParE, AAG08352; OprD, NP_249649; NalB (MexR) AAG03813; NalC, AAG07108; NalD, AAG06962; PA5471, AAG08856; MexZ, AF073776.

Abbreviations: PDC, Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase; QRDR, quinolone resistance-determining region; ST, sequence type; WT, wild-type or no mutation.

Table 2.

Summary of Mutations

Isolate NumberIsolate IDAmpCPDC SubstitutionsAmpC Regulators
QRDRs
AmpD and DacBAmpRGyrAGyrBParCParE
PA01ST TypePDC-1WTWTWTWTWTWTWT
17166298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
32961298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, D135N, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
47927298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, D135N, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
58649298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, D135N, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
68096298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, D135N, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
Isolate NumberIsolate IDAmpCPDC SubstitutionsAmpC Regulators
QRDRs
AmpD and DacBAmpRGyrAGyrBParCParE
PA01ST TypePDC-1WTWTWTWTWTWTWT
17166298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
32961298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, D135N, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
47927298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, D135N, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
58649298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, D135N, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
68096298PDC-16G27D, T105A, V205L, G391AWTM1L, D135N, G238E, M288RT83IWTS87LWT
OMP
MexAB-OprM regulators
MexXY-OprM regulators
Isolate IDOprDNalB (MexR)NalCNalDPA5471MexZ
Isolate NumberPA01WTWTWTWTWTWT
17166Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
32961Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
47927Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
58649Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
68096Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
OMP
MexAB-OprM regulators
MexXY-OprM regulators
Isolate IDOprDNalB (MexR)NalCNalDPA5471MexZ
Isolate NumberPA01WTWTWTWTWTWT
17166Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
32961Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
47927Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
58649Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT
68096Premature stop codon at aa 79V126EG71E, A145V, S209RWTWon't amplifyWT

Reference wild-type comparator amino acid sequences from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01 isolate listed in Table 2 are as follows:

PDC-1, ACQ82807; AmpD, AAG07910; DacB, NP_251737; AmpR, AAG07496; GyrA, AAG06556; GyrB, AAG03394; ParC, NP_253651; ParE, AAG08352; OprD, NP_249649; NalB (MexR) AAG03813; NalC, AAG07108; NalD, AAG06962; PA5471, AAG08856; MexZ, AF073776.

Abbreviations: PDC, Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase; QRDR, quinolone resistance-determining region; ST, sequence type; WT, wild-type or no mutation.

Immunoblot expression of Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase (PDC) β-lactamse, PDC-16. Lanes: 1 – Isolate 2961, 2 – Isolate 7927, 3 – Isolate 8649, 4 – Isolate 7166, 5 – Isolate 8096, 6 – Marker. Probed with 0.1 µg/mL anti-PDC antibody; 1:10 000 dilution of Protein G-HRP conjugate.
Figure 2.

Immunoblot expression of Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase (PDC) β-lactamse, PDC-16. Lanes: 1 – Isolate 2961, 2 – Isolate 7927, 3 – Isolate 8649, 4 – Isolate 7166, 5 – Isolate 8096, 6 – Marker. Probed with 0.1 µg/mL anti-PDC antibody; 1:10 000 dilution of Protein G-HRP conjugate.

Quinolone Resistance

T83I in gyrA and S87L in parC were found in all isolates. These mutations confer high-level fluoroquinolone resistance [8].

Carbapenem Resistance

All isolates also had a premature stop codon at amino acid 79 in OprD, resulting in inactivation of the main porin for imipenem uptake [9].

Mutations in Efflux Pump Regulators

Three point mutations (G71E, A145V, and S209R) were observed in nalC; however, their role in an MDR phenotype in P. aeruginosa is unclear at the present time. Also of note, isolate 6 developed moderate amikacin resistance (32 µg/mL). In this case, MexXY overexpression might be expected, although specific mutations in mexZ were not seen. It could be that additional MexXY regulators were involved, or the presence of an aminoglycoside modifying enzyme, in that resistance phenotype. Additionally, the gene PA5471 would not amplify in any of the isolates. Deletions of the coding sequence in PA5471 can lead to MexXY-OprM overexpression [5, 10].

To determine whether recurrent P. aeruginosa bacteremia represented relapse of infection or acquisition of a new strain, we performed multilocus sequence typing on all P. aeruginosa isolates following the method of Curran et al [11]. All isolates belonged to sequence type 298 and displayed resistance to ciprofloxacin (MIC >2 µg/mL), meropenem, and imipenem (MICs >8 µg/mL) by Microscan; only isolate 5 appeared to be resistant to colistin. The cause of that colistin resistance is undetermined.

Clonality of the isolates was investigated using the DiversiLab Bacterial BarCodes strain typing system (bioMerieux, Durham, NC). Pure genomic DNA was isolated with the UltraClean Microbial DNA Isolation Kit using the protocol for Gram-negative bacteria (MoBio Laboratories, Inc, Carlsbad, CA). The DNA was then used as the template for amplification using the DiversiLab Pseudomonas kit, with amplicons analyzed on the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA). A similarity dendrogram was generated with the DiversiLab Software (bioMerieux), and isolates with >95% similarities were considered to be of the same clone type (Figure 3). All isolates had >98.5% similarity. This result, together with confirmation of the same sequence type in all isolates, supports the conclusion that the same strain was present throughout the course of infection, despite the evolution of the extended spectrum cephalosporin/aztreonam resistant phenotype after treatment with ceftazidime.
Genetic typing with repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR). Dendrogram of rep-PCR illustrating >98% similarity in band patterns, suggesting persistence of the same Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain, rather than re-infection with a different strain.
Figure 3.

Genetic typing with repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR). Dendrogram of rep-PCR illustrating >98% similarity in band patterns, suggesting persistence of the same Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain, rather than re-infection with a different strain.

Although much information was uncovered in this investigation it should be noted that certain limitations to this study exist, such as: (1) MICs were reported by breakpoints only (ie, endpoints were not determined), (2) expression of efflux pumps was not examined, and (3) the relevance of nalC mutations to efflux pump expression still remains unknown.

CONCLUSION

We have chronicled the molecular basis of evolving antibiotic resistance in a case of MDR P. aeruginosa in a patient with PVE, an infection that is very difficult to eradicate. Serial analysis shows that the occurrence of point mutations contributed to the MDR phenotype. Likely, changes in the efflux pump regulators and reduced porin expression contribute to the carbapenem-resistant phenotype. Our molecular analysis also uncovered point mutations in quinolone resistance-determining regions. However, the key finding during the course of treatment was the mutation in ampR leading to the emergence of cephalosporin and aztreonam resistance. This was due to the D135N AmpR amino acid change, which causes a conformational change in the Amp R regulator, leading to overexpression of the PDC-16 β-lactamase that was present in these isolates.

We stress that ampR is a global transcriptional regulator also associated with alginate production and biofilm formation. Prolonged exposure to β-lactams before surgical intervention may have contributed to the selection of ampR regulator mutants. This should serve as a reminder of the complexity of acquired resistance in P. aeruginosa PVE and the therapeutic challenges it entails.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Dr Joseph Coselli and his cardiothoracic surgery team.

Financial support. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R01AI100560, R01AI063517, and R01AI072219. This study was also supported in part by funds and/or facilities provided by the Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs (award number 1I01BX001974 to R. A. B. from the Biomedical Laboratory Research & Development Service of the VA Office of Research and Development and the Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center VISN 10 to R. A. B.) and the National Center for Research Resources (Clinical and Translational Science Award UL1 RR024989 to F. P.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

References

1

Murdoch
DR
,
Corey
GR
,
Hoen
B
et al. .
Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study
.
Arch Intern Med
2009
;
169
:
463
73
.

2

Morpeth
S
,
Murdoch
D
,
Cabell
CH
et al. .
Non-HACEK Gram-negative bacillus endocarditis
.
Arch Intern Med
2007
;
147
:
829
35
.

3

Lewis
K
.
Riddle of biofilm resistance
.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
2001
;
45
:
999
1007
.

4

Chu
VH
,
Sexton
DJ
,
Cabell
CH
et al. .
Repeat infective endocarditis: differentiating relapse from reinfection
.
Clin Infect Dis
2005
;
41
:
406
9
.

5

Cabot
G
,
Ocampo-Sosa
AA
,
Dominguez
MA
et al. .
Genetic markers of widespread extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones
.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
2012
;
56
:
6349
57
.

6

Kuga
A
,
Okamoto
R
,
Inoue
M
.
ampR gene mutations that greatly increase class C beta-lactamase activity in Enterobacter cloacae
.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
2000
;
44
:
561
7
.

7

Winkler
ML
,
Papp-Wallace
KM
,
Hujer
AM
et al. .
Unexpected challenges in treating multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam in archived isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
2015
;
59
:
1020
9
.

8

Vila
J
,
Ruiz
J
,
Goni
P
,
Marcos
A
,
Jimenez de Anta
T
.
Mutation in the gyrA gene of quinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii
.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
1995
;
39
:
1201
3
.

9

Wolter
DJ
,
Hanson
ND
,
Lister
PD
.
Insertional inactivation of oprD in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa leading to carbapenem resistance
.
FEMS Microbiol Lett
2004
;
236
:
137
43
.

10

Muller
C
,
Plesiat
P
,
Jeannot
K
.
A two-component regulatory system interconnects resistance to polymyxins, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and beta-lactams in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
2011
;
55
:
1211
21
.

11

Curran
B
,
Jonas
D
,
Grundmann
H
,
Pitt
T
,
Dowson
CG
.
Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa
.
J Clin Microbiol
2004
;
42
:
5644
9
.

Author notes

Correspondence: R. A. Bonomo, Medical Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 10701 East Boulevard, Cleveland, OH 44106 ([email protected]).

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected].

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.