-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Eunjeong Shin, Khalid M Dousa, Christopher Bethel, Mary Nantongo, Steven M Holland, Eric Rubin, Jürgen B Bulitta, Barry N Kreiswirth, Robert A Bonomo, P-775. Unlocking Synergistic Potency: Dual Action of β-Lactam and β-Lactamase Inhibitor in Combating Mycobacterium abscessus through β-Lactamase Inhibition and Multi-Target Receptor Inactivation, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Volume 12, Issue Supplement_1, February 2025, ofae631.969, https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.969
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab) poses significant clinical challenges, leading to chronic pulmonary disease in immunocompromised patients. Current treatment involve amikacin (AMK), which is toxic, highlighting the imperative for safer options. This study continues our evaluation of the synergistic effects of a β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) against Mab and to elucidate the underlying mechanism.
The binding affinities and chemical interactions between target receptors (LDT1-5, DDC, PBP B, and PBP-lipo) and BL/BLI were determined via kinetics, mass spectrometry, DSF, flow cytometry and microscopy. The synergistic effects of BL/BLI were evaluated in time-kill studies, conducted over 10 days, using ATCC 19977 producing BlaMab.
Imipenem (IPM) showed high binding affinities for both LDTs and PBPs, with an extremely low inhibition constant (Ki,app; Tab. 1). Cephalosporins exhibited moderate binding affinity for both LDTs and PBPs, whereas amoxicillin (AMX) selectively targeted PBPs. The inactivation of BlaMab and LDTs/PBPs by durlobactam (DUR) exhibited greater efficacy compared to avibactam (AVI), aligning with their respective bactericidal effects. DUR showed a 75-fold lower Ki,app for BlaMab in comparison to AVI. The Ki,app of DUR for PBP B, PBP-lipo, and LDT2 fell below the clinical concentration, whereas those of AVI did not. Single β-lactam treatment resulted in minimal killing (∼1 log10 reduction), but adding AVI significantly enhanced killing by inhibition of β-lactamase (∼4 log10 reduction for IPM+AVI and ∼2 log10 reduction for others; Fig. 1). DUR alone showed 2 log10 reduction, and when combined with IPM or dual BL, it achieved near-eradication, surpassing the SOC (AMK + Clarithromycin + IPM or cefoxitin). Inhibition of PBP-lipo by sulopenem, IPM, DUR, and AMX changed the cell morphology to filaments. In accordance with the binding affinity to LDTs and PBPs, alterations in melting temperature were detected.
IPM + DUR + SUL showed the most killing of Mab with limited regrowth. This outcome can be attributed to β-lactamase inhibition and the inactivation of multiple targets, not only LDTs but also PBPs. This combination strategy holds promise for enhanced efficacy of Mab treatment, necessitating further study in clinical trials.
All Authors: No reported disclosures
Author notes
Study Group: Yes
Session: 67. Tuberculosis and other Mycobacterial Infections
Thursday, October 17, 2024: 12:15 PM
- amoxicillin
- lung diseases
- amikacin
- cefoxitin
- cephalosporins
- clarithromycin
- flow cytometry
- disclosure
- imipenem
- immunocompromised host
- lactams
- mass spectrometry
- body temperature
- kinetics
- temperature
- mycobacterium abscessus
- chemical interactions
- cellular morphology
- affinity
- killing
- avibactam
- durlobactam
- sulopenem
Comments