Abstract

Background

The use of initial specimen diversion devices (ISDD) has been shown to reduce blood culture (BCx) contamination. Studies have estimated that each false-positive BCx costs $3,073-4,818, based on an increased length of stay (LOS) of 1-8.4 days and antimicrobial and laboratory use; however, it is unknown whether implementing ISDD would lead to a reduction in these outcomes. This study aimed to assess the impact of ISDD utilization on BCx contamination, LOS, antimicrobials days of therapy (DOT), and false positive central-line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) due to Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, enterococci, and Candida.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients at three medical centers. In center 1 (treatment arm), BCx were initially collected without ISDD (pre-intervention). The first Plan-Do-Study-ACT (PDSA) cycle included utilizing an ISDD (Steripath®) for BCx collection; however, the uptake was low, given the absence of process metrics. In the second PDSA, BCx was only accepted by the laboratory if submitted along with the ISDD wrap. In centers 2-3 (control), BCx were collected without ISDD across the three periods. Difference-in-difference (DID) was used to estimate the effect of PDSA2 on outcomes by comparing the changes between the treated and untreated groups (Figure 1). BCx contamination, CLABSI, LOS, and DOT were entered into multiple regression models to adjust for demographics and several comorbidities.

Results
A total of 15,810 patients were included. Groups had similar characteristics across the study periods except for SARS-COV2 and admission status (Table 1). After adjusting for confounders (Table 2), the intervention was associated with a reduction in BCx contamination (OR 0.38, P< 0.001), no change in LOS (B=0.08, P=0.620), and increased DOT per patient days (IRR=1.10, P=0.006). There were 8 CLABSIs in the treated group (2 preintervention, 3 PDSA1, and 3 PDSA2) vs. 1 in control (PDSA2), and the model did not converge due to the small number.
Difference-in-difference estimation for blood culture contamination (A), LOS (B), DOT (C), CLABSI (D)
Figure 1

Difference-in-difference estimation for blood culture contamination (A), LOS (B), DOT (C), CLABSI (D)

LOS: Length of Stay; DOT: Days of Therapy; CLABSI: Central-line associated bloodstream infections The blue vertical line represents the start of the second Plan-Do-Study-ACT (PDSA2) The green and red points represent monthly data per treatment and control groups, respectively. The green and blue lines represent the average per each group before and after PDSA2.

Patient Characteristics Across the Study Groups. PDSA: Plan-Do-Study-Act; IQR: Interquartile Range; SARS-COV2: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2; SOT: Solid Organ Transplantation; HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; C. diff: Clostridioides difficile; ICU: Intensive Care Unit; ED: Emergency Department 1 Kruskal-Wallis or Chi-squared tests were used for statistical comparison as appropriate. * Indicates statistical significance (P<0.05).
Table 1

Patient Characteristics Across the Study Groups. PDSA: Plan-Do-Study-Act; IQR: Interquartile Range; SARS-COV2: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2; SOT: Solid Organ Transplantation; HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; C. diff: Clostridioides difficile; ICU: Intensive Care Unit; ED: Emergency Department 1 Kruskal-Wallis or Chi-squared tests were used for statistical comparison as appropriate. * Indicates statistical significance (P<0.05).

Multiple Variable Regression for Blood Culture Contamination, Length of Stay and Days of Therapy. NB: Negative Binomial; OR: Odd Ratio; CI: 95% Confidence Interval; LOS: Length of Stay; DOT: Days of Therapy; PD: Patient Days; IRR: Incidence Rate Ratio; Pos: Positive; Neg: Negative; SARS-COV2: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2; SOT: Solid Organ Transplantation; HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; C. diff: Clostridioides difficile; ICU: Intensive Care Unit; ED: Emergency Department.
Table 2

Multiple Variable Regression for Blood Culture Contamination, Length of Stay and Days of Therapy. NB: Negative Binomial; OR: Odd Ratio; CI: 95% Confidence Interval; LOS: Length of Stay; DOT: Days of Therapy; PD: Patient Days; IRR: Incidence Rate Ratio; Pos: Positive; Neg: Negative; SARS-COV2: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2; SOT: Solid Organ Transplantation; HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; C. diff: Clostridioides difficile; ICU: Intensive Care Unit; ED: Emergency Department.

Conclusion

Implementing ISDD decreased BCx contamination without reducing LOS, DOT, and CLABSI. Further studies are needed to assess if implementing ISDD would lead to clinical benefits and establish the true cost-effectiveness of this method.

Disclosures

Sabra L. Shay, BSN, MPH, Premier Inc.: Employee

This content is only available as a PDF.

Author notes

Session: 40. Bacteremia

Thursday, October 12, 2023: 12:15 PM

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.