https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3669-6615
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Hana Kim, Coral Gartner, Richard Edwards, Cheneal Puljević, Kylie Morphett, Dong Ha Kim, Hae-ryoung Chun, Martin Ekdahl, Heewon Kang, Public Support for Tobacco Endgame Policies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Volume 27, Issue 4, April 2025, Pages 586–597, https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae149
Close - Share Icon Share
Abstract
An increasing number of countries are adopting the tobacco endgame goal. High levels of public support can accelerate momentum towards implementing tobacco endgame policies. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of public support for tobacco endgame policies and to examine the geographical distribution of studies, support among key populations (adolescents and young adults, people who smoke), and the association between survey design and support.
We searched Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published from 2013 onwards. Google was used to search the gray literature. The reference lists of included articles were hand-searched. Studies were included if they reported the proportions of people supporting one or more endgame policies. Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI checklist for prevalence studies.
Forty-seven articles were included. Aotearoa/New Zealand and the United States were the countries with the most studies (n = 11, respectively). Three-level meta-analyses showed the highest support for mandating a very low nicotine content in tobacco products (76%, 95% CI: 61% to 87%). Meta-regressions were performed to assess the associations of population subgroup and survey design with support levels. The level of support was lower among people who smoke compared to the general population (β range: −1.59 to −0.51). Support for some policies was lower when neutral or don’t know response options were included.
Public support for most tobacco endgame policies was high.
Assessing public support can assist with progressing tobacco endgame policies. Policies that are widely supported by the public may be more politically feasible to implement. Qualitative studies and trial studies can further inform communication and implementation strategies for tobacco endgame policies.
Comments