-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Michael Bockmayr, Kim Harnisch, Lara Pohl, Leonille Schweizer, Theresa Mohme, Meik Körner, Malik Alawi, Abigail Suwala, Mario Dorostkar, Camelia Monoranu, Martin Hasselblatt, Annika Wefers, David Capper, Jürgen Hench, Stephan Frank, Timothy Richardson, Ivy Tran, Elisa Liu, Matija Snuderl, Lara Engertsberger, Martin Benesch, Andreas von Deimling, Denise Obrecht, Martin Mynarek, Stefan Rutkowski, Markus Glatzel, Julia Neumann, Ulrich Schüller, EPEN-06. Comprehensive profiling of myxopapillary ependymomas identifies a distinct molecular subtype with relapsing disease, Neuro-Oncology, Volume 24, Issue Supplement_1, June 2022, Page i39, https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.143
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Myxopapillary ependymoma (MPE) is a heterogeneous disease regarding histopathology and outcome. The underlying molecular biology is poorly understood, and markers that reliably predict the patients’ clinical course are unknown. We assembled a cohort of 185 tumors classified as MPE based on DNA methylation from pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients. Methylation patterns, copy number profiles, and MGMT promoter methylation were analyzed for all tumors, 106 tumors were evaluated histomorphologically, and RNA sequencing was performed for 37 cases. Based on methylation profiling, we defined two subtypes MPE-A and MPEB, and explored associations with epidemiological, clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics of these tumors. Tumors in the methylation class MPE were histologically diagnosed as WHO grade I (59%), WHO grade II (37%), or WHO grade III tumors (4%). 75/77 analyzed tumors expressed HOXB13, which is a diagnostic feature not detected in other spinal ependymal tumors. Based on DNA methylation, our series split into two subtypes. MPE-A occurred in younger patients (median age 27 vs. 45 years, p=7.3e-05). They were enriched with WHO grade I tumors and associated with papillary morphology and MGMT promoter hypermethylation (all p<0.001). MPE-B included most tumors initially diagnosed as WHO grade II and cases with tanycytic morphology. Copy number alterations were more common in MPE-A. RNA sequencing revealed an enrichment for extracellular matrix and immune system-related signatures in MPE-A. 15/30 MPE-A could not be totally resected compared to 1/58 MPE-B (p=6.3e-08), and progression-free survival was significantly better for MPE-B (p=3.4e-06, 10-year relapse rate 33% vs. 85%). We unraveled the morphological and clinical heterogeneity of MPE by identifying two molecularly distinct subtypes. These subtypes significantly differed in progression-free survival and will likely need different protocols for surveillance and treatment.
- extracellular matrix
- adolescent
- heterogeneity
- adult
- dna methylation
- methylation
- molecular biology
- o(6)-methylguanine-dna methyltransferase
- pediatrics
- sequence analysis, rna
- world health organization
- diagnosis
- neoplasms
- surveillance, medical
- hypermethylation
- ependymoma, myxopapillary
- histopathology tests
- progression-free survival