-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Amanda King, Julianie De La Cruz Minyety, Alvina Acquaye, Nicole Briceno, Anna Choi, Alexa Christ, Ewa Grajkowska, Varna Jammula, Heather Leeper, Jason Levine, Matthew Lindsley, Jennifer Reyes, Kayla Roche, James Rogers, Michael Timmer, Lisa Boris, Eric Burton, Nicole Lollo, Marissa Panzer, Lily Polskin, Marta Penas-Prado, Valentina Pillai, Brett Theeler, Jing Wu, Mark Gilbert, Terri Armstrong, Elizabeth Vera, NCOG-39. EXPLORING PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES (PROS) ACROSS ETHNORACIAL GROUPS IN PRIMARY BRAIN TUMOR (PBT) PATIENTS: DIFFERENCES IN THE ILLNESS EXPERIENCE, Neuro-Oncology, Volume 23, Issue Supplement_6, November 2021, Page vi160, https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab196.629
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Past research in PBT patients has demonstrated that minorities may have a survival advantage compared to Whites for high-grade tumors, though little is known about their illness experience given their underrepresentation in clinical trials. This study explored differences in PROs across race-ethnicity within a large PBT cohort describing associated burden and risk for minority populations where data is scarce.
Demographic, clinical characteristics, MDASI-Brain Tumor, PROMIS Depression and Anxiety Short-Forms, and Neuro-QoL Cognitive Function were collected from the most recent timepoint for PBT patients enrolled on the Natural History Study. Descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, and linear regression were used to report results.
The sample included 562 PBT patients (58% male, median age = 50 [18-85]) comprised of 79% White, 6% African American (AA), 10% Hispanic, and 5% Asian patients per self-report. Most patients had a high-grade glioma (60%), with 28% on active treatment and 44% with good KPS (90-100). Among the most commonly reported moderate-severe symptoms were fatigue ( > 40% in all groups), difficulty remembering (30-40% of Asians, AAs, and Whites), and disturbed sleep (44% in Asians, 29% in Hispanics), while hemiparesis was common only for AA patients (37%). There were no differences between groups with respect to symptom burden and interference, mood disturbance, or cognitive function. Race/ethnicity group was not predictive of overall symptom burden or interference, but for all groups, higher KPS predicted lower symptom and interference scores (p < .001 and p = .004, respectively).
While some symptoms were common across ethnoracial groups, there were differences in symptom patterns, suggesting there may be other factors driving their illness experience. Future exploration of socioeconomic and cultural factors that might contribute to the symptom burden of minorities is warranted, which may allow development of targeted interventions to improve clinical outcomes in these groups.
- anabolic steroids
- anxiety
- fatigue
- demography
- depressive disorders
- ethnic group
- glioma
- hispanics or latinos
- mental processes
- minority groups
- sleep disorders
- socioeconomic factors
- brain
- neoplasms
- quality of life
- treatment outcome
- hemiparesis
- mood disturbances
- african american
- cognitive ability
- asian
- linear regression
- illness
- descriptive statistics
- cultural factors
- patient self-report
- acute aortic syndrome
- self-report
- underrepresented groups