https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9315-8653
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Ariana M Familiar, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Arastoo Vossough, Jeffrey B Ware, Sina Bagheri, Nastaran Khalili, Hannah Anderson, Debanjan Haldar, Phillip B Storm, Adam C Resnick, Benjamin H Kann, Mariam Aboian, Cassie Kline, Michael Weller, Raymond Y Huang, Susan M Chang, Jason R Fangusaro, Lindsey M Hoffman, Sabine Mueller, Michael Prados, Ali Nabavizadeh, Towards consistency in pediatric brain tumor measurements: Challenges, solutions, and the role of artificial intelligence-based segmentation, Neuro-Oncology, Volume 26, Issue 9, September 2024, Pages 1557–1571, https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae093
Close - Share Icon Share
Abstract
MR imaging is central to the assessment of tumor burden and changes over time in neuro-oncology. Several response assessment guidelines have been set forth by the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working groups in different tumor histologies; however, the visual delineation of tumor components using MRIs is not always straightforward, and complexities not currently addressed by these criteria can introduce inter- and intra-observer variability in manual assessments. Differentiation of non-enhancing tumors from peritumoral edema, mild enhancement from absence of enhancement, and various cystic components can be challenging; particularly given a lack of sufficient and uniform imaging protocols in clinical practice. Automated tumor segmentation with artificial intelligence (AI) may be able to provide more objective delineations, but rely on accurate and consistent training data created manually (ground truth). Herein, this paper reviews existing challenges and potential solutions to identifying and defining subregions of pediatric brain tumors (PBTs) that are not explicitly addressed by current guidelines. The goal is to assert the importance of defining and adopting criteria for addressing these challenges, as it will be critical to achieving standardized tumor measurements and reproducible response assessment in PBTs, ultimately leading to more precise outcome metrics and accurate comparisons among clinical studies.
