Abstract

Objective. To compare the findings in rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-affected joints between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and 18F-fluoride (NaF) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT).

Methods. We enrolled twelve RA patients who started a new biologic agent (naïve 9 and switch 3). At entry, both hands were examined by 18F-FDG PET/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT, and X-ray. Intensity of PET signals was determined by standardized uptake value max (SUVmax) in metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and ulnar, medial, and radial regions of the wrists. Hand X-rays were evaluated according to the Genant-modified Sharp score at baseline and 6 months.

Results. Both 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF accumulated in RA-affected joints. The SUVmax of 18F-FDG correlated with that of 18F-NaF in individual joints (r = 0.65), though detail distribution was different between two tracers. 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG signals were mainly located in the bone and the surrounding soft tissues, respectively. The sum of SUVmax of 18F-NaF correlated with disease activity score in 28 joint (DAS28), modified health assessment questionnaire (MHAQ), and radiographic progression. 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF signals were associated with the presence of erosions, particularly progressive ones.

Conclusion. Our data show that both 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET signals were associated with RA-affected joints, especially those with ongoing erosive changes.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)
You do not currently have access to this article.