ABSTRACT

Pulsating variables are prevalent in the classical |$\delta$| Scuti instability strip of intermediate-age open star clusters. The cluster membership of these stars facilitates a comparative analysis of their evolution in analogous environments. In this study, we integrate ground-based observations, Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) Full Frame Images (FFIs), and Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) data to investigate variable stars in the intermediate-age open star cluster NGC 2126. We performed ground-based time-series observations of NGC 2126 to identify variable stars within its vicinity. Next, we determined the membership of these stars using parallax and the proper motions from Gaia DR3 archive. Then, we searched the TESS FFIs for counterparts to the variables identified above and performed their frequency analysis and classification. Finally, we modelled the light curves (LCs) of detected eclipsing binaries (EBs), including V551 Aur, which has a pulsating component. We found 25 members and 85 field variable stars. In TESS FFIs, we found LCs for 11 known variables and a new rotational variable. We determined that the pulsating EB V551 Aur is a member of the cluster. The low- and medium-resolution spectra revealed the line profile variation and the basic parameters for the star, respectively. Simultaneous modelling of the eclipses and the embedded pulsations resulted in improved orbital parameters for the binary system. We also report the determination of orbital parameters for the previously uncharacterized EB system UCAC4 700−043174.

1 INTRODUCTION

Open star clusters comprise stars that have emerged from a common molecular cloud and are gravitationally bound to one another. Consequently, they possess analogous ages, distances, and initial chemical compositions. The membership of stars within an open cluster imposes constraints, especially regarding their age in comparison to the ambiguously determined ages of field stars. Thus, examining stars that are constituents of an open cluster is more advantageous than analysing field stars. Diverse independent methodologies for stellar characterization, such as asteroseismology (Aerts 2021), can gain from open clusters by imposing supplementary constraints on parameters such as age and mass (Bedding et al. 2023; Pamos Ortega et al. 2023; Li et al. 2024). The intermediate-age open star clusters possess their turn-off point adjacent to the classical instability strip, thereby hosting a variety of pulsating variable stars of spectral type A and F, including |$\delta$| Scuti stars and |$\gamma$| Doradus stars (Chehlaeh et al. 2018).

Ground-based studies of open clusters yield ensemble photometry for a collection of stars within a defined area. The Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences (ARIES) in Nainital, India, possesses photometric observational facilities in the Northern hemisphere, which are very suitable for studying open clusters. Details regarding the telescopes at the site will be presented in Section 3 later in this paper. To capitalize on the advantages of studying open clusters, ARIES, Nainital is conducting long-term photometric monitoring using 1-m class telescopes to examine pulsating variable stars in both young open clusters (Joshi et al. 2020a; Lata et al. 2023) and intermediate-age open clusters (Joshi et al. 2020b; Maurya et al. 2023). Additionally, we also perform long-term surveys for pulsating A- and F-type field stars (Ashoka et al. 2000; Martinez et al. 2001; Joshi et al. 2003, 2006, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2016b, 2017). We have recently augmented this exploration with space-based observations from extended Kepler mission (K2) and Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) concerning field stars (Trust et al. 2021, 2023; Joshi et al. 2022b; Dileep, Joshi & Kurtz 2024; Sarkar et al. 2024). In this study, we integrate the space-based observations for open star clusters with the ground-based observations.

Similar to open star clusters, eclipsing binaries (EBs) provide an independent assessment of fundamental stellar parameters. They provide accurate measurements of stellar masses and radii through orbital dynamics and eclipse depths (Panchal et al. 2023). If one of the binary components is pulsating, the target becomes increasingly unusual. The examination of pulsations in EB components provides insights into the internal structure of the pulsating star, system evolution, and the influence of tidal forces inducing oscillations (Pigulski 2006; Murphy 2019; Lampens 2021). The existence of these unusual variable systems in open clusters serves as valuable test beds for validating various theoretical models for pulsation and stellar evolution.

We conducted a comprehensive ground- and space-based investigation of the intermediate-age open star cluster NGC 2126 (Gáspár et al. 2003). We utilized ground-based photometric observations from telescopes of varying diameters at ARIES, Nainital, low- to medium-resolution spectra, TESS Full Frame Images (FFIs), and Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) data.

The manuscript is structured as follows. Section 2 delineates the sample selection, while Section 3 examines ground-based observations for the detection of variable stars. In Section 4, we ascertain the membership of the detected variables within the cluster, and in Section 5, we evaluate the cluster parameters. Subsequently, in Section 6, we examine the TESS light curves (LCs) for all stars and categorize the identified variables in Section 7. Ultimately, we present the modelling of the binary LCs in Section 8 and provide a summary of our findings in Section 9. We present our conclusions in Section 10.

2 SAMPLE SELECTION

We selected NGC 2126 (RA = |$06^{\mathrm{ h}} 02^{\mathrm{ m}} 37 {_{.}^{\rm s}} 9$|⁠, Dec. = |$+49^{\circ} 52^{\prime } 59^{\prime \prime }$|⁠), which is an intermediate-age open star cluster hosting various pulsating stars located in the |$\delta$| Scuti instability strip. The first CCD photometric study of the cluster was performed by Gáspár et al. (2003). Later, it was studied by Liu et al. (2012) and more recently Chehlaeh et al. (2018) presented new ground-based photometric observations for NGC 2126 and reported 11 variables, including 2 new |$\delta$| Scuti variables. This makes this cluster as a potential target for asteroseismic investigation of pulsating variables of A and F type. Another reason that makes this cluster interesting is the presence of the EB V551 Aur, which shows pulsational variability on top of the eclipses. The membership of this star to the cluster will place strong constraints on its evolution and pulsation mechanism. All of the previous ground-based studies had limitations due to their short and discrete observations. Thus, aliasing and frequency resolution limit the accuracy of detected frequencies. Furthermore, NGC 2126 has one EB, UCAC4 700–043174, but there were insufficient data to model the system or report an orbital period (Chehlaeh et al. 2018). Thanks to the nearly continuous TESS observations spanning approximately a month in each sector, we can address the limitations due to lack of continuous data in ground-based observations. The long and short cadence of TESS enables us to study both faint and bright targets of the cluster.

3 GROUND-BASED PHOTOMETRIC OBSERVATIONS

Time-series photometric observations for NGC 2126 were acquired in the V and R bands with the 1.3-m Devasthal Fast Optical Telescope (DFOT), Nainital, India (Joshi et al. 2022a). This telescope is equipped with a 2k |$\times$| 2k CCD, and gives a field of view of about 18 × 18 arcmin|$^2$| with a plate scale of 0.54 arcsec pixel−1. For standardization of our targets, the standard field SA 98 of Landolt (1992) was also observed in UBVRI filters. For the pre-processing of the images, several bias frames and twilight flats were taken during the observing nights. We furthermore observed the cluster in the V and R bands during one more night using the 1.04-m Sampurnanand Telescope (ST), Nainital, India. This telescope is equipped with a 4k |$\times$| 4k CCD, which gives a field of view of about 15 × 15 arcmin|$^2$| (Yadav et al. 2022). The CCD was used in 4 |$\times$| 4 binning mode to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); this gives a plate scale of 0.92 arcsec pixel−1 after binning. Additionally, we also observed the pulsating EB V551 Aur in NGC 2126 for a couple of nights with the 3.6-m Devasthal Optical Telescope (DOT; Kumar et al. 2018). This telescope is equipped with a 4k |$\times$| 4k CCD Imager that covers a field of view of 6.5 × 6.5 arcmin|$^2$| (Pandey et al. 2018) and has a plate scale of 0.2 arcsec pixel−1 after 2 |$\times$| 2 binning. An overview with the details of the collected ground-based observations is given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Observational log for NGC 2126. The telescopes used for multiband photometric observations and the date of observations are listed. Each of the columns named |$V, R, U, B$|⁠, and I has entries of the form ‘number of frames |$\times$| exposure time’.

TelescopeDate of observationVRUBI
1.04-m ST2023 Nov 22|$119\times 50$| s|$119\times 50$| s
1.3-m DFOT2022 Oct 29|$71\times 40$| s|$70\times 30$| s
 2022 Oct 30|$12\times 40$| s|$12\times 30$| s
 2022 Nov 11|$200\times 50$| s
 2023 Feb 11|$59\times 50$| s|$59\times 30$| s
 2023 Feb 14|$44\times 50$| s|$44\times 30$| s
 2023 Feb 18|$103\times 50$| s|$103\times 30$| s
 2023 Feb 19|$17\times 50$| s|$17\times 30$| s
 2023 Oct 15|$50\times 50$| s|$3\times 50$| s
 2023 Nov 14|$100\times 50$| s|$100\times 30$| s
 2023 Nov 18|$111\times 50$| s|$111\times 50$| s
 2023 Dec 2|$102\times 50$| s|$103\times 30$| s|$3\times 300$| s|$3\times 120$| s|$3\times 20$| s
3.6-m DOT2021 Dec 13|$12\times 300$| s|$11\times 100$| s
  |$1\times 150$| s
 2021 Dec 14|$12\times 100$| s|$9\times 200$| s
  |$10\times 150$| s|$12\times 300$| s
  |$1\times 300$| s
 2021 Dec 15|$16\times 100$| s|$11\times 270$| s
  |$11\times 80$| s|$12\times 160$| s
 2023 Mar 28|$50\times 50$| s
TelescopeDate of observationVRUBI
1.04-m ST2023 Nov 22|$119\times 50$| s|$119\times 50$| s
1.3-m DFOT2022 Oct 29|$71\times 40$| s|$70\times 30$| s
 2022 Oct 30|$12\times 40$| s|$12\times 30$| s
 2022 Nov 11|$200\times 50$| s
 2023 Feb 11|$59\times 50$| s|$59\times 30$| s
 2023 Feb 14|$44\times 50$| s|$44\times 30$| s
 2023 Feb 18|$103\times 50$| s|$103\times 30$| s
 2023 Feb 19|$17\times 50$| s|$17\times 30$| s
 2023 Oct 15|$50\times 50$| s|$3\times 50$| s
 2023 Nov 14|$100\times 50$| s|$100\times 30$| s
 2023 Nov 18|$111\times 50$| s|$111\times 50$| s
 2023 Dec 2|$102\times 50$| s|$103\times 30$| s|$3\times 300$| s|$3\times 120$| s|$3\times 20$| s
3.6-m DOT2021 Dec 13|$12\times 300$| s|$11\times 100$| s
  |$1\times 150$| s
 2021 Dec 14|$12\times 100$| s|$9\times 200$| s
  |$10\times 150$| s|$12\times 300$| s
  |$1\times 300$| s
 2021 Dec 15|$16\times 100$| s|$11\times 270$| s
  |$11\times 80$| s|$12\times 160$| s
 2023 Mar 28|$50\times 50$| s
Table 1.

Observational log for NGC 2126. The telescopes used for multiband photometric observations and the date of observations are listed. Each of the columns named |$V, R, U, B$|⁠, and I has entries of the form ‘number of frames |$\times$| exposure time’.

TelescopeDate of observationVRUBI
1.04-m ST2023 Nov 22|$119\times 50$| s|$119\times 50$| s
1.3-m DFOT2022 Oct 29|$71\times 40$| s|$70\times 30$| s
 2022 Oct 30|$12\times 40$| s|$12\times 30$| s
 2022 Nov 11|$200\times 50$| s
 2023 Feb 11|$59\times 50$| s|$59\times 30$| s
 2023 Feb 14|$44\times 50$| s|$44\times 30$| s
 2023 Feb 18|$103\times 50$| s|$103\times 30$| s
 2023 Feb 19|$17\times 50$| s|$17\times 30$| s
 2023 Oct 15|$50\times 50$| s|$3\times 50$| s
 2023 Nov 14|$100\times 50$| s|$100\times 30$| s
 2023 Nov 18|$111\times 50$| s|$111\times 50$| s
 2023 Dec 2|$102\times 50$| s|$103\times 30$| s|$3\times 300$| s|$3\times 120$| s|$3\times 20$| s
3.6-m DOT2021 Dec 13|$12\times 300$| s|$11\times 100$| s
  |$1\times 150$| s
 2021 Dec 14|$12\times 100$| s|$9\times 200$| s
  |$10\times 150$| s|$12\times 300$| s
  |$1\times 300$| s
 2021 Dec 15|$16\times 100$| s|$11\times 270$| s
  |$11\times 80$| s|$12\times 160$| s
 2023 Mar 28|$50\times 50$| s
TelescopeDate of observationVRUBI
1.04-m ST2023 Nov 22|$119\times 50$| s|$119\times 50$| s
1.3-m DFOT2022 Oct 29|$71\times 40$| s|$70\times 30$| s
 2022 Oct 30|$12\times 40$| s|$12\times 30$| s
 2022 Nov 11|$200\times 50$| s
 2023 Feb 11|$59\times 50$| s|$59\times 30$| s
 2023 Feb 14|$44\times 50$| s|$44\times 30$| s
 2023 Feb 18|$103\times 50$| s|$103\times 30$| s
 2023 Feb 19|$17\times 50$| s|$17\times 30$| s
 2023 Oct 15|$50\times 50$| s|$3\times 50$| s
 2023 Nov 14|$100\times 50$| s|$100\times 30$| s
 2023 Nov 18|$111\times 50$| s|$111\times 50$| s
 2023 Dec 2|$102\times 50$| s|$103\times 30$| s|$3\times 300$| s|$3\times 120$| s|$3\times 20$| s
3.6-m DOT2021 Dec 13|$12\times 300$| s|$11\times 100$| s
  |$1\times 150$| s
 2021 Dec 14|$12\times 100$| s|$9\times 200$| s
  |$10\times 150$| s|$12\times 300$| s
  |$1\times 300$| s
 2021 Dec 15|$16\times 100$| s|$11\times 270$| s
  |$11\times 80$| s|$12\times 160$| s
 2023 Mar 28|$50\times 50$| s

The images were pre-processed with Image Reduction and Analysis Facility (iraf) tasks: zerocombine, flatcombine, and CCDPROC. We applied the method of point-spread function (PSF) photometry to obtain the instrumental magnitudes for the stars in the target field; for this, we used the code daophotii by Stetson (1992).

The standard field SA 98 was used to convert the instrumental magnitudes to standard magnitudes. The following equations define the resulting transformations (Stetson 1987):

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)

where v, b, i, r, and u are the instrumental magnitudes; |$V, B, I, R, \mathrm{ and} \ U$| refer to the standard magnitudes; and Q is the airmass.

The search for variables in the cluster field was done based on the LCs obtained with 1.3-m DFOT. The V-band photometric LCs from each night were combined together and then phase-folded with the period that matches the first main peak in the Lomb–Scargle periodogram. The same period was used to phase-fold the combined R-band LCs to see any corresponding variations in the R band. The stars that showed brightness variation greater than three standard deviations with respect to the mean brightness, at least in the V band, were considered to be variable stars and were chosen for further analysis. The LCs for newly detected member variables from the ground are given in Fig. 1 and the field stars in Figs. A1A5. We also list the detected dominant frequencies and the corresponding amplitudes of the field stars in Table A1.

Phase-folded LCs of the newly detected variables, which are the members of open cluster NGC 2126. Their respective IDs and detected periods are given in the title of each plot.
Figure 1.

Phase-folded LCs of the newly detected variables, which are the members of open cluster NGC 2126. Their respective IDs and detected periods are given in the title of each plot.

4 CLUSTER MEMBERSHIP

For the determination of membership, we used astrometric data from Gaia DR3. The Gaia mission (Gaia Collaboration 2016) is an all-sky survey that collects multiband photometric, astrometric, and spectroscopic data. Gaia’s astrometric data have proven to be very successful in identifying and determining the membership of open clusters and globular clusters. The proper motion and parallax of all stars within a radius of 18 arcmin around the cluster centre were obtained by querying the Gaia DR3 catalogue (Gaia Collaboration 2023). Stars with large error bars were excluded from our study. We constructed the vector point diagram (VPD) of the cluster region to identify stars with similar proper motion (Fig. 2). Furthermore, we used the parallaxes to select samples with similar distances. For the membership probability, we used the method described in Wu et al. (2002) by identifying a cluster population and field population from the VPD. For this purpose, we plotted the radial density profile (RDP) of the VPD by calculating the number density in concentric annular regions from the centre of the VPD. For the centre of VPD, we smoothed the proper motion space with a 2D Gaussian kernel and chose the point with the maximum kernel density. The resultant RDP is shown in Fig. 3 along with a fitted King’s profile (King 1962). The number density was seen to approach the background density at a radial distance |$\sim$|0.8 mas yr−1. We chose this as the limiting radius for probable cluster members and the stars outside this radius as field stars.

The top panel shows the VPD of NGC 2126 using Gaia DR3 proper motion data. The bottom panel shows the position of the cluster members and field stars in the sky as observed by Gaia DR3. Both panels have stars within an 18 arcmin radius from the centre, which was selected for membership determination. In both panels, the bold dots represent the member stars for which the membership probability is greater than 50 per cent and the faint dots in the background represent the field stars.
Figure 2.

The top panel shows the VPD of NGC 2126 using Gaia DR3 proper motion data. The bottom panel shows the position of the cluster members and field stars in the sky as observed by Gaia DR3. Both panels have stars within an 18 arcmin radius from the centre, which was selected for membership determination. In both panels, the bold dots represent the member stars for which the membership probability is greater than 50 per cent and the faint dots in the background represent the field stars.

The Gaia colour–magnitude diagram (CMD) for stars having membership probability greater than 50 per cent is shown in Fig. 4. The members that are highly probable are situated along the main sequence, the evolved red giant branch, and the turn-off point. These members will introduce substantial constraints on the system’s age by means of isochrone fitting (see Section 5).

Number density plot for the proper motion space from Gaia data. The solid curve shows the best-fitting RDP. The horizontal dashed line shows the background density. The vertical dashed line marks the chosen limiting radius.
Figure 3.

Number density plot for the proper motion space from Gaia data. The solid curve shows the best-fitting RDP. The horizontal dashed line shows the background density. The vertical dashed line marks the chosen limiting radius.

The CMD of NGC 2126 with the field stars (faint dots in the background) and the member stars (colour-coded bold dots according to their calculated membership probability). The probability scale is represented by the colour bar on the right side (50–100 per cent).
Figure 4.

The CMD of NGC 2126 with the field stars (faint dots in the background) and the member stars (colour-coded bold dots according to their calculated membership probability). The probability scale is represented by the colour bar on the right side (50–100 per cent).

5 CLUSTER PARAMETERS

The CMD can be used to fit theoretical isochrones and determine cluster parameters such as age, metallicity, and reddening. The age and metallicity of the member stars should be comparable as a result of their shared origin. Thus, by comparing theoretical isochrones of varying ages and metallicities, we can estimate the cluster parameters. The Gaia CMD consists of the color index between gaia blue and red photometer bands (BP-RP colour) and the G-band mean magnitude. We used the isochrones downloaded from the CMD service CMD 3.7 in the Gaia early data release 3 (Gaia EDR3) photometric system, and the evolutionary tracks from the parsec release v1.2S (Bressan et al. 2012; Chen et al. 2014, 2015; Tang et al. 2014). We utilized the Gaia DR3 parallaxes for the cluster members to determine an initial distance modulus and used prior literature values for an initial value for reddening. Utilizing these corrections, we drew a series of isochrones next to the observed CMD. Subsequently, the fit was optimized using the asteca code (Perren, Vázquez & Piatti 2015) by selecting the above guessed range of values (metallicity = [0.010, 0.030], log age = [9.0, 9.3], distance modulus = [9, 12], and extinction = [0.2, 1]) as uniform priors. asteca computes synthetic isochrones between the given grid of isochrones and uses a genetic algorithm (GA; Charbonneau 1995) to minimize the negative log likelihood, −log[|$L_{i}$|(z, a, d, e)], where z is the metallicity, a is the age, d is the distance, and e is the extinction. The GA is an optimization technique derived from natural selection, wherein a population of candidate solutions evolves over generations through selection (optimal fit), crossover (various combinations of parent sets), and mutation (random alterations introduced at each stage) to identify the most effective solution for a specific problem. It is particularly effective in exploring complex, multidimensional spaces and avoiding local minima. For more thorough details regarding the algorithm, please refer to Charbonneau (1995). Additionally, to quantify parameter uncertainties we employed the Markov chain Monte Carlo method within asteca; the resultant posterior distribution is shown in Fig. 5. By fitting a Gaussian to the parallax histogram (Fig. 6), we calculated the mean parallax, which allowed us to calculate the distance to the cluster, which came out to be 1.3 |$\pm$| 0.1 kpc. Also, we calculated distance to the cluster from the distance modulus of the isochrone fit using standard relations. We used the best-fitting coefficients published by Gaia team based on the empirical relation used by Danielski et al. (2018) to convert extinction in Gaia G band (⁠|$A_{G}$|⁠) to extinction in V band (⁠|$A_{V}$|⁠), and used |$R_{v}$| = 3.1 to get the reddening |$E(B-V)$| for the cluster. We also verified this estimate using colour–colour diagrams from ground-based observations (Fig. B1). Apart from that, a medium-resolution spectrum (see Section 8.2) of a member variable, V551 Aur, was used to estimate the reddening towards the cluster. We used the calibration published by Poznanski, Prochaska & Bloom (2012), between the equivalent width of Na doublets and the reddening (Fig. 7). The final values for the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram were found by taking the average of the distance estimates from the isochrone fit and the parallax fit, as well as the reddening estimates from the isochrone fit and the Na doublets. The best-fitting parameters for the cluster are tabulated in Table 2 and the best-fitting isochrone is plotted in Fig. 8.

The resultant posterior distribution for the best-fitting isochrone.
Figure 5.

The resultant posterior distribution for the best-fitting isochrone.

The histogram in blue displays the parallax distribution of the cluster members and the histogram in grey shows the parallax distribution of the field stars. By fitting a Gaussian to the cluster member parallaxes, we obtained the mean cluster parallax, which was then used to determine the distance to the cluster.
Figure 6.

The histogram in blue displays the parallax distribution of the cluster members and the histogram in grey shows the parallax distribution of the field stars. By fitting a Gaussian to the cluster member parallaxes, we obtained the mean cluster parallax, which was then used to determine the distance to the cluster.

The interstellar absorption lines of sodium in the medium-resolution spectrum of V551 Aur. The blue horizontal dashed line is the continuum. We selected the regions between the vertical dashed lines to calculate the equivalent width of Na D1 and D2 lines, filled regions of absorption lines in the figure. The resultant equivalent width is the horizontal width of the filled rectangles drawn between 0 and 1.
Figure 7.

The interstellar absorption lines of sodium in the medium-resolution spectrum of V551 Aur. The blue horizontal dashed line is the continuum. We selected the regions between the vertical dashed lines to calculate the equivalent width of Na D1 and D2 lines, filled regions of absorption lines in the figure. The resultant equivalent width is the horizontal width of the filled rectangles drawn between 0 and 1.

The figure shows the best-fitting isochrone using the code asteca represented by the solid curve. The synthetic members calculated by asteca are represented with straight and inverted triangles, respectively. Our input observed members from Gaia DR3 are represented as circles.
Figure 8.

The figure shows the best-fitting isochrone using the code asteca represented by the solid curve. The synthetic members calculated by asteca are represented with straight and inverted triangles, respectively. Our input observed members from Gaia DR3 are represented as circles.

Table 2.

The table gives the best-fitting parameters for isochrone fitting with asteca. Here, Z is the metal fraction, t is the age in years, A|$_{G}$| is the extinction in Gaia G band, |$(m-M)_{0}$| is the distance modulus of the cluster, D gives the distance to the cluster, and E(BV) is the reddening. The uncertainty in the last digit is given in brackets for each value.

ParameterIsochrone fitParallax fitNa D lines
|$\mathrm{ log}_{10}(t)$|9.22(7)
Z0.016(1)
|$A_{G}$|0.49(1) mag
|$(m-M)_{0}$|10.34(1) mag
D1.169(5) kpc1.3(1) kpc
|$E(B-V)$|0.20(4)0.29(8)
ParameterIsochrone fitParallax fitNa D lines
|$\mathrm{ log}_{10}(t)$|9.22(7)
Z0.016(1)
|$A_{G}$|0.49(1) mag
|$(m-M)_{0}$|10.34(1) mag
D1.169(5) kpc1.3(1) kpc
|$E(B-V)$|0.20(4)0.29(8)
Table 2.

The table gives the best-fitting parameters for isochrone fitting with asteca. Here, Z is the metal fraction, t is the age in years, A|$_{G}$| is the extinction in Gaia G band, |$(m-M)_{0}$| is the distance modulus of the cluster, D gives the distance to the cluster, and E(BV) is the reddening. The uncertainty in the last digit is given in brackets for each value.

ParameterIsochrone fitParallax fitNa D lines
|$\mathrm{ log}_{10}(t)$|9.22(7)
Z0.016(1)
|$A_{G}$|0.49(1) mag
|$(m-M)_{0}$|10.34(1) mag
D1.169(5) kpc1.3(1) kpc
|$E(B-V)$|0.20(4)0.29(8)
ParameterIsochrone fitParallax fitNa D lines
|$\mathrm{ log}_{10}(t)$|9.22(7)
Z0.016(1)
|$A_{G}$|0.49(1) mag
|$(m-M)_{0}$|10.34(1) mag
D1.169(5) kpc1.3(1) kpc
|$E(B-V)$|0.20(4)0.29(8)

6 TESS PHOTOMETRY

The TESS is an all-sky survey telescope whose prime objective is to detect exoplanets orbiting nearby bright stars using the transit method (Ricker 2014). Apart from its primary mission, it also provides time-series photometry for asteroseismic studies of stars with magnitudes up to 12. TESS target pixel files (TPFs) and LC files are available with short cadences (20 and 120 s), while FFIs are taken with a longer cadence (30 min). Recently, the FFIs were taken at a shorter cadence of 200 s, which we used in our study. These data products can be downloaded from Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST).

Given the large pixel size of the TESS CCD, which is 21 arcsec pixel−1, resolving crowded fields like we see in open star clusters will be difficult, so our search for variability was primarily based on ground-based observations. The higher spatial resolution of ground-based observations enables the resolution of individual stars in the crowded field. Consequently, we concentrated our investigation of variability in the TESS FFIs on sources that had confirmed variable signals from the ground.

TESS observed the field of NGC 2126 during Sector 19 with an 1800-s cadence and during Sectors 59, 60, and 73 with a 200-s cadence. The observations from Sector 60 were excluded from this study because the targets were too close to the edge of the TESS CCD, preventing useful photometry. The log of observations taken from the TESS archive is given in Table 3. We performed the FFI photometry of our targets in the field using the python packages eleanor (Feinstein et al. 2019) and lightkurve (Lightkurve Collaboration 2018). To perform the photometry, we relied on the cut-outs taken from the FFI using the package tesscut (Brasseur et al.2019).

Table 3.

NGC 2126 was observed in the sectors listed below. The observation period, cadence (in seconds), and duration (in days) are also given.

TESS sectorObservation periodCadence (s)Duration (d)
1928 Nov–23 Dec, 2019180024.5
5926 Nov–23 Dec, 202220026.4
737 Dec–3 Jan, 202420026.9
TESS sectorObservation periodCadence (s)Duration (d)
1928 Nov–23 Dec, 2019180024.5
5926 Nov–23 Dec, 202220026.4
737 Dec–3 Jan, 202420026.9
Table 3.

NGC 2126 was observed in the sectors listed below. The observation period, cadence (in seconds), and duration (in days) are also given.

TESS sectorObservation periodCadence (s)Duration (d)
1928 Nov–23 Dec, 2019180024.5
5926 Nov–23 Dec, 202220026.4
737 Dec–3 Jan, 202420026.9
TESS sectorObservation periodCadence (s)Duration (d)
1928 Nov–23 Dec, 2019180024.5
5926 Nov–23 Dec, 202220026.4
737 Dec–3 Jan, 202420026.9

eleanor is a python package that automates the extraction of LCs from FFIs. For Sector 19, the eleanor package was used and the resulting sky-subtracted LCs were free of telescope systematic and suitable for analysis. To identify our targets in the FFI, we overplotted the Gaia sources in the field and the apertures were carefully selected to reduce the contamination from nearby targets. eleanor did not perform well in Sectors 59 and 73, necessitating a manual approach utilizing the lightkurve package. Here, we also conducted an investigation into the FFI by overplotting the Gaia sources to minimize contamination from nearby sources and used custom apertures to extract the sky-subtracted LCs. As a final step, we used the RegressionCorrector in lightkurve package. The task creates a design matrix, which is a matrix of flux time series of the background pixels. For which a principal component analysis (Deb & Singh 2009) is performed to reduce its dimensionality and select the first few principal components, which contain most of the instrumental and systematic effects in that particular part of the sector. Then, a linear combination of these components is used to remove the long-term trends in the LC.

Furthermore, we attempted a global photometric search for variables in TESS FFIs independent of the ground-based observations with a PSF-based technique utilizing the flux distribution from Gaia observations, implemented in the python package tglc (Han & Brandt 2023). We used tglc for only long-cadence data (Sector 19), since the computational expense for short cadence was high and not possible for us at the moment. This resulted in the discovery of one new variable in addition to the known variables. Due to contamination-related uncertainty, we had to discard a lot of other targets with variable signals. We discuss how we dealt with the effect of contamination in our data in Section 6.1.

The frequency analysis for the variable stars in TESS data was done using the program PERIOD04 (Lenz & Breger 2004). We adopted the criterion SNR |$> =\!\! 5.6$| given by Zong et al. (2016) for space-based observations. The SNR was calculated after pre-whitening all of the dominant frequencies to obtain the residual spectra, followed by calculating the noise using a box size of one cycle per day along both sides of the target frequency. The errors in frequency and amplitude were calculated using the analytical relations provided by Montgomery & O’Donoghue (1999). Tables C1 and C2 list the frequencies for the known variables detected using TESS and from the ground and the LCs in the respective sectors are plotted in Figs C1, C2, and C3.

6.1 Contamination

The large pixel size of TESS causes the blending of signals from nearby sources. The resulting LCs for a target can only be trusted when (i) the source is much brighter than the nearby contaminating sources so that the background source only adds to the noise and (ii) the contaminating sources are non-variables and, hence, only increase the noise level rather than introduce signals in the periodogram.

In order to investigate the contamination in TESS LCs, we first overplotted the Gaia sources on the TPF in the vicinity of each target to see whether there are any bright nearby objects that might potentially contribute to contamination. After that, we selected a variety of custom apertures to determine the origin of a specific set of frequencies within the frequency spectrum. An example of this investigation is shown in Fig. 9, where V551 Aur (V6) is a pulsating EB that is contaminated with a |$\delta$| Scuti star (N1). Next, we cross-checked whether any of these frequencies are pre-defined in the ground-based data obtained from Chehlaeh et al. (2018). For example, in case of V6 in Fig. 9, the two strong blue peaks towards the right were detected by Chehlaeh et al. (2018) for N1 and few of the dominant red peaks to the left were reported by Chehlaeh et al. (2018) for V6.

The top panel depicts the TPF of star V6 overlaid with nearby Gaia DR3 targets. V551 Aur (V6) is identified with a ‘+’ symbol. Custom apertures were chosen near V6 (marked with red boxes) and N1 (marked with blue boxes). The bottom panel depicts the periodogram generated by the two apertures, V6 in red and N1 in blue, which are superimposed on each other. The harmonic signals and pulsation are stronger in the red aperture and weaker in the blue aperture. The two dominant frequency signals in blue behave in opposite ways, indicating that they are from the nearby star N1.
Figure 9.

The top panel depicts the TPF of star V6 overlaid with nearby Gaia DR3 targets. V551 Aur (V6) is identified with a ‘+’ symbol. Custom apertures were chosen near V6 (marked with red boxes) and N1 (marked with blue boxes). The bottom panel depicts the periodogram generated by the two apertures, V6 in red and N1 in blue, which are superimposed on each other. The harmonic signals and pulsation are stronger in the red aperture and weaker in the blue aperture. The two dominant frequency signals in blue behave in opposite ways, indicating that they are from the nearby star N1.

We found that two of the pulsating stars ZV2 (hybrid star) and N1 (⁠|$\delta$| Scuti star) were contaminated significantly by the nearby binary stars V4 and V6, respectively, and found that the contamination can be addressed with the above technique. Furthermore, to quantify the extent of contamination endured by the variable stars detected in our study, we calculated a contamination factor for each of these stars using Gaia DR3 positions and magnitudes, where we took the ratio of the target flux to the total flux in a 21 arcsec radius.

7 CLASSIFICATION OF VARIABLE STARS

Variable stars are classified according to the shape of their LCs, amplitude of variability, frequency of variability, and location on the HR diagram. The pulsating stars can be identified from the HR diagram by plotting the instability strips for |$\delta$| Scuti and |$\gamma$| Doradus pulsator. In our study, we used the theoretical |$\delta$| Scuti and |$\gamma$| Doradus instability strips, computed by Dupret et al. (2005).

The standard B- and V-band magnitudes from our ground-based observations with the 1.3-m DFOT were used to generate the HR diagram for the cluster members. After extinction correction, the colour index, which is the difference between B-band magnitude and V-band magnitude (B-V), was used to find the effective temperature (⁠|$T_{\rm eff}$|⁠), which was based on an empirical relationship from Torres (2010). Next, the empirical relation provided by Torres (2010) was employed to calculate the bolometric correction (⁠|$\mathrm{ BC}_{v}$|⁠) for the stars in the V band. Then, the luminosity can be estimated using the standard relations, where we took bolometric magnitude of sun as |$M_{\mathrm{ bol}_{\odot }}$| = 4.73 (Torres 2010). The HR diagram in Fig. 10 shows the known variables, the newly found variables, and the instability strips for the |$\delta$| Scuti and |$\gamma$| Doradus pulsations.

HR diagram for the member stars based on the ground-based observations. Blue ‘star’ symbols and the blue triangles indicate the known pulsating variables and the EBs, respectively. The red ‘star’ symbols represent the newly detected variable stars. The green and blue dashed lines represent the edges of the theoretical $\delta$ Scuti and $\gamma$ Doradus instability strips, respectively, computed by Dupret et al. (2005).
Figure 10.

HR diagram for the member stars based on the ground-based observations. Blue ‘star’ symbols and the blue triangles indicate the known pulsating variables and the EBs, respectively. The red ‘star’ symbols represent the newly detected variable stars. The green and blue dashed lines represent the edges of the theoretical |$\delta$| Scuti and |$\gamma$| Doradus instability strips, respectively, computed by Dupret et al. (2005).

|$\gamma$| Doradus variables are mainly non-radial g-mode pulsators showing periodic variations in their brightness with pulsation frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 3 d|$^{-1}$| (Aerts, Christensen-Dalsgaard & Kurtz 2010) and amplitude of variation up to 0.1 mag in the V band. The convective blocking drives the g-mode pulsations, with buoyancy as the restoring force (Dupret et al. 2005). In the HR diagram, the |$\gamma$| Doradus instability strip is seen overlapped with the cooler edge of the |$\delta$| Scuti instability strip in the main sequence with an early F spectral type.

|$\delta$| Scuti stars are primarily p-mode pulsators with brightness variations ranging from 0.001 to 0.8 mag in the V band and pulsation frequencies ranging from 5 to 50 d|$^{-1}$| (Aerts et al. 2010). The |$\kappa$|-mechanism drives the pulsations in these stars, which occur at the partial ionization zones in the outer radiative region (Pamyatnykh 2000). These stars are found at the lower part of the classical instability strip, which intersects the main sequence, called the |$\delta$| Scuti instability strip. They are A- to early F-type stars with masses ranging from 1.5 to 2.5 |${\rm M}_{\odot }$|⁠. They pulsate in both radial and non-radial p modes. Some of the stars pulsate both in g modes and p modes, with characteristics similar to |$\gamma$| Doradus and |$\delta$| Scuti stars. These stars are known as hybrid pulsators (Handler et al. 2009).

The G- and K- spectral type stars are located below the |$\delta$| Scuti and |$\gamma$| Doradus instability strips. These stars, with a convective envelope, exhibit rotational variability due to spots on their surface (Mamajek & Hillenbrand 2008). The LCs of these rotational variables produce a frequency spectrum with the rotational frequency below 5 d|$^{-1}$| and at least one harmonic of the rotational frequency (Balona 2013). Thus, we classified the main-sequence variables with a frequency less than 5 d|$^{-1}$| falling in the G to K spectral type as rotational variables. Also, in this region one can find the solar-type oscillations. The stars whose LCs show (partial or full) eclipses can be classified as EBs.

All of the member stars, as well as those with LCs in both TESS and ground-based observations, were classified according to the criteria listed above. Table 4 shows the results for newly discovered member stars, while Table 5 shows the results for stars with variability in TESS and ground-based observations. We observe that ground-based classification is incomplete due to insufficient data.

Table 4.

The newly detected variable cluster members are listed with their ID, RA, Dec., standard magnitude, first dominant frequency used for phase folding, corresponding semi-amplitude, assigned variability type, membership, and contamination in TESS.

IDRA (deg)Dec. (deg)Mag (mag)Frequency (d−1)Amp (mag)Variability typeMem. (per cent)Cont. (per cent)
7290.588549.752 83317.4232.7960.02290.849.40
12490.527 91749.767 41718.181.9050.02985.80
14390.567 02849.775 22213.8175.6900.009DSCT75.20
24790.657 52849.808 47214.7854.2240.01077.333.17
33590.711 27849.831 30615.7395.2340.00970.93.79
34590.536 13949.832 63915.4553.0160.00961.93.44
37790.607 27849.842 7516.1694.2310.011ROT57.389.78
54990.663 47249.881 27812.7431.7410.02489.851.58
56890.606 94449.884 22213.7525.1190.005DSCT54.989.35
61490.643 16749.889 63913.4656.0620.006DSCT64.846.79
70390.680 77849.901 2514.2644.7220.00574.437.33
75290.618549.908 41713.9164.9480.00569.820.28
87590.610 77849.929 52813.9493.2020.005GDOR76.37.07
88190.857 52849.932 30616.8022.5680.008ROT83.138.97
100690.611 38949.966 88914.223.9060.00574.81.89
107090.679 44449.983 61114.7564.3590.00550.53.21
112890.437 27849.997 91715.5052.9070.01282.724.59
120390.778 66750.015 19416.3123.2840.055ROT90.23.19
IDRA (deg)Dec. (deg)Mag (mag)Frequency (d−1)Amp (mag)Variability typeMem. (per cent)Cont. (per cent)
7290.588549.752 83317.4232.7960.02290.849.40
12490.527 91749.767 41718.181.9050.02985.80
14390.567 02849.775 22213.8175.6900.009DSCT75.20
24790.657 52849.808 47214.7854.2240.01077.333.17
33590.711 27849.831 30615.7395.2340.00970.93.79
34590.536 13949.832 63915.4553.0160.00961.93.44
37790.607 27849.842 7516.1694.2310.011ROT57.389.78
54990.663 47249.881 27812.7431.7410.02489.851.58
56890.606 94449.884 22213.7525.1190.005DSCT54.989.35
61490.643 16749.889 63913.4656.0620.006DSCT64.846.79
70390.680 77849.901 2514.2644.7220.00574.437.33
75290.618549.908 41713.9164.9480.00569.820.28
87590.610 77849.929 52813.9493.2020.005GDOR76.37.07
88190.857 52849.932 30616.8022.5680.008ROT83.138.97
100690.611 38949.966 88914.223.9060.00574.81.89
107090.679 44449.983 61114.7564.3590.00550.53.21
112890.437 27849.997 91715.5052.9070.01282.724.59
120390.778 66750.015 19416.3123.2840.055ROT90.23.19

Notes. DSCT: |$\delta$| Scuti, GDOR: |$\gamma$| Doradus, and ROT: Rotational variable.

Table 4.

The newly detected variable cluster members are listed with their ID, RA, Dec., standard magnitude, first dominant frequency used for phase folding, corresponding semi-amplitude, assigned variability type, membership, and contamination in TESS.

IDRA (deg)Dec. (deg)Mag (mag)Frequency (d−1)Amp (mag)Variability typeMem. (per cent)Cont. (per cent)
7290.588549.752 83317.4232.7960.02290.849.40
12490.527 91749.767 41718.181.9050.02985.80
14390.567 02849.775 22213.8175.6900.009DSCT75.20
24790.657 52849.808 47214.7854.2240.01077.333.17
33590.711 27849.831 30615.7395.2340.00970.93.79
34590.536 13949.832 63915.4553.0160.00961.93.44
37790.607 27849.842 7516.1694.2310.011ROT57.389.78
54990.663 47249.881 27812.7431.7410.02489.851.58
56890.606 94449.884 22213.7525.1190.005DSCT54.989.35
61490.643 16749.889 63913.4656.0620.006DSCT64.846.79
70390.680 77849.901 2514.2644.7220.00574.437.33
75290.618549.908 41713.9164.9480.00569.820.28
87590.610 77849.929 52813.9493.2020.005GDOR76.37.07
88190.857 52849.932 30616.8022.5680.008ROT83.138.97
100690.611 38949.966 88914.223.9060.00574.81.89
107090.679 44449.983 61114.7564.3590.00550.53.21
112890.437 27849.997 91715.5052.9070.01282.724.59
120390.778 66750.015 19416.3123.2840.055ROT90.23.19
IDRA (deg)Dec. (deg)Mag (mag)Frequency (d−1)Amp (mag)Variability typeMem. (per cent)Cont. (per cent)
7290.588549.752 83317.4232.7960.02290.849.40
12490.527 91749.767 41718.181.9050.02985.80
14390.567 02849.775 22213.8175.6900.009DSCT75.20
24790.657 52849.808 47214.7854.2240.01077.333.17
33590.711 27849.831 30615.7395.2340.00970.93.79
34590.536 13949.832 63915.4553.0160.00961.93.44
37790.607 27849.842 7516.1694.2310.011ROT57.389.78
54990.663 47249.881 27812.7431.7410.02489.851.58
56890.606 94449.884 22213.7525.1190.005DSCT54.989.35
61490.643 16749.889 63913.4656.0620.006DSCT64.846.79
70390.680 77849.901 2514.2644.7220.00574.437.33
75290.618549.908 41713.9164.9480.00569.820.28
87590.610 77849.929 52813.9493.2020.005GDOR76.37.07
88190.857 52849.932 30616.8022.5680.008ROT83.138.97
100690.611 38949.966 88914.223.9060.00574.81.89
107090.679 44449.983 61114.7564.3590.00550.53.21
112890.437 27849.997 91715.5052.9070.01282.724.59
120390.778 66750.015 19416.3123.2840.055ROT90.23.19

Notes. DSCT: |$\delta$| Scuti, GDOR: |$\gamma$| Doradus, and ROT: Rotational variable.

7.1 Intrinsic variables

7.1.1 |$\gamma$| Doradus stars

NGC 2126 contains two known |$\gamma$| Doradus variables (V1 and V2). Our membership analysis revealed that V2 is not likely to be a cluster member. The two stars were detected by TESS. Both stars have a frequency lower than 3 c/d. Fig. 11 shows a comparison of our results with previous frequency estimates from the literature. There were no harmonics of the fundamental frequency in the frequency spectrum, showing that they are not rotational variables. The position of V1 in the HR diagram is within the |$\gamma$| Doradus instability strip. Since V2 is not a member star, we used the Gaia temperature |$T_{\rm eff}$| = 7134 K, indicating that it is an early F-type star. Thus, we classify V1 and V2 as |$\gamma$| Doradus variables. From our ground observations, we classified the star 875, as |$\gamma$| Doradus variable, based on the frequency and position in the HR diagram. The TESS data for this star produced null results.

Representation of the results of the frequency analysis of the TESS data of the stars without contamination. The filled circles with error bars in blue, red, and magenta show the observed amplitudes in the TESS data of Sectors 19, 59, and 73, respectively. They are compared to those published by Chehlaeh et al. (2018) (upward triangles) and Zhang, Deng & Luo (2012) (downward triangles), if available.
Figure 11.

Representation of the results of the frequency analysis of the TESS data of the stars without contamination. The filled circles with error bars in blue, red, and magenta show the observed amplitudes in the TESS data of Sectors 19, 59, and 73, respectively. They are compared to those published by Chehlaeh et al. (2018) (upward triangles) and Zhang, Deng & Luo (2012) (downward triangles), if available.

7.1.2 |$\delta$| Scuti stars and hybrid pulsators

Chehlaeh et al. (2018) reported five |$\delta$| Scuti stars (V3, V5, ZV1, N1, N2) and a hybrid pulsator (ZV2). All of these stars were detected in TESS data. ZV1, N1, and N2 were determined to be probable cluster members. Figs 11 and 12 show a comparison between the frequencies detected in literature and those we detected from TESS’s three sectors. Pulsation frequencies in ZV1, N1, and N2 were similar to those of a |$\delta$| Scuti star, ranging from 5 to 30 c/d. They belong to the |$\delta$| Scuti instability strip on the HR diagram. Thus, we classify these stars as |$\delta$| Scuti stars. However, N1 is contaminated by a nearby binary star V6. To address this, we used the method described in the previous section. Since V3 and V5 are not cluster members, we used the Gaia temperatures; V3 has |$T_{\rm eff}$| = 7454 K, while V5 has |$T_{\rm eff}$| = 6166 K, which corresponds to a spectral type F. The spectral type along with the pulsation frequencies from TESS indicates that these are |$\delta$| Scuti stars. According to Zhang et al. (2012), ZV2 is a hybrid pulsator because it has a low frequency of 1.812 d|$^{-1}$| in addition to the |$\delta$| Scuti-type frequencies. Our analysis of TESS data recovered the dominant frequency 14.851 d|$^{-1}$|⁠, as well as the low frequency reported by Zhang et al. (2012). As ZV2 is not a member, we used the Gaia temperature, |$T_{\rm eff}$| = 7081 K, indicating an F-type star. This means that the star is in the |$\gamma$| Doradus instability strips where |$\delta$| Scuti instability strip also overlaps. Thus, we classify it as a hybrid pulsator. This star was also contaminated by a nearby EB, V4. We used the method described in previous section in this case also to identify the frequencies. Using ground-based data, we identified three new |$\delta$| Scuti variables, 143, 568, and 614. The classification was made based on their positions in the HR diagram and oscillation frequencies. TESS detected no signals from these stars due to high contamination.

Same as Fig. 11, but for stars affected by contamination.
Figure 12.

Same as Fig. 11, but for stars affected by contamination.

7.2 Extrinsic variables

7.2.1 Rotational variable

We discovered a new variable, 839, in the field of NGC 2126. The star shows variable signals on the ground, as well as TESS data. Fig. 13 compares the TESS LC and frequency spectra of this star. This star demonstrates TESS’s improved frequency resolution. The dominant frequency is the same in both spectra; however, the ground-based spectrum has many aliases. The frequency is less than 5 c/d and appears as harmonics in the TESS frequency spectra. The Gaia temperature, |$T_{\rm eff}$| = 5725, indicates a G-type star. Thus, we classify this star as a rotational variable. From the ground-based observations, we also identified three additional rotational variables, 377, 881, and 1203. We were unable to detect any of these stars using TESS due to contamination.

The left panel shows the LCs for the newly detected rotational variable 839 phase-folded to the dominant peak in its frequency spectrum and binned with a bin size of 0.02 in phase. The red points are from TESS Sector 19 and the blue points are from the ground-based observations. In the right panel, the corresponding frequency spectra for the respective LCs are given. We see the advantage of frequency resolution from TESS compared to the ground-based observations.
Figure 13.

The left panel shows the LCs for the newly detected rotational variable 839 phase-folded to the dominant peak in its frequency spectrum and binned with a bin size of 0.02 in phase. The red points are from TESS Sector 19 and the blue points are from the ground-based observations. In the right panel, the corresponding frequency spectra for the respective LCs are given. We see the advantage of frequency resolution from TESS compared to the ground-based observations.

7.2.2 Eclipsing binaries

Chehlaeh et al. (2018) identified three EBs in NGC 2126, V4, V6, and ZV3. They were able to cover a large enough phase range for two stars, V4 and V6, allowing them to model the LCs and derive basic parameters such as orbital periods, inclination, mass ratio, and temperature ratio. For ZV3, however, modelling and period determination were not possible due to a lack of data covering the full eclipse. We used continuous time-series TESS observations to fully cover the three EBs’ phase range in our study. ZV3 and V6 are members of the cluster, while V4 is not a member. Given the cluster membership, the case of V6 is more interesting because it is a pulsating EB.

According to available data, Chehlaeh et al. (2018) estimated an orbital period of 1–1.5 d for ZV3. However, with the help of TESS data that included multiple eclipses, we were able to calculate the orbital period for this star. We used all of the primary minima found in Sectors 19, 59, and 73 by fitting a parabola to their dips. To determine the system’s linear ephemeris, the orbital cycle versus time of primary minima (TOM) curve was fitted with a linear relation.

The resulting linear ephemeris for ZV3 is

(6)

where |$\mathrm{ BJD_{min}}$| is the time of primary minima at epoch E. Fig. 14 shows the ephemeris fit.

The top panel shows the orbital cycle versus TOM detected from all the three TESS sectors. The dashed line is the straight line fit to these data. The bottom panel shows the residuals of the fit.
Figure 14.

The top panel shows the orbital cycle versus TOM detected from all the three TESS sectors. The dashed line is the straight line fit to these data. The bottom panel shows the residuals of the fit.

For V4, Chehlaeh et al. (2018) discovered an orbital period of 3.300 281 d. We collected LCs for this star from TESS Sectors 19, 59, and 73. In addition to the primary minima detected from TESS sectors, two minima reported in Chehlaeh et al. (2018) were included in the ephemeris fit.

The subsequent linear ephemeris for V4 is

(7)

Gáspár et al. (2003) described V6 as an EB with a pulsating component. Chehlaeh et al. (2018) revisited the nature of this variable star, as well as the parameters of the open cluster that hosts it. They concluded that the pulsation could be caused by tidally excited g modes, which exhibit tidal resonance with the orbital period. Although previous research concluded that V551 Aur is unlikely to belong to the open cluster, our analysis of Gaia DR3 data revealed that it most likely does. As in the previous case, we determined the linear ephemeris from all the primary minima detected in TESS sectors, as well as the ground-based minima listed in table 9 of Chehlaeh et al. (2018).

The final linear ephemeris for V6 is

(8)

Fig. 15 depicts the phased and binned TESS LCs for three EBs. Figs D1 and D2 show the ephemeris fit for V6 and V4, respectively.

From left to right, each panel shows the phased LCs of V6, V4, and ZV3, using all the available TESS sectors (19, 59, and 73) and binned using a bin size 0.002 in phase. For V6, we can clearly see the pulsations on top of the eclipses.
Figure 15.

From left to right, each panel shows the phased LCs of V6, V4, and ZV3, using all the available TESS sectors (19, 59, and 73) and binned using a bin size 0.002 in phase. For V6, we can clearly see the pulsations on top of the eclipses.

8 ECLIPSING BINARY MODELLING

EBs provide an independent method for calculating stellar masses and radii. By modelling the eclipsing LCs and the radial velocity curve, we can determine the best-fitting parameters for masses, radii, inclination, and so on. However, we only have TESS LCs for our EBs. Due to the faintness of these stars, no high-resolution spectra could be obtained using the facilities we have direct access to. Thus, we used the eclipsing LCs alone to model our EBs. While modelling the EB LC, one should take care of the intrinsic variability that it may possess due to either some intrinsic process in the system such as pulsations, mass transfer, star-spots, etc. (Pigulski 2006) or external reasons such as telescope systematics or contamination in case of TESS. Therefore, it was imperative to incorporate the intrinsic variability or long-term systematics into the LC modelling process.

The primary and secondary minima of all three of our EBs (V4, V6, and ZV3) are clearly distinct, with the out-of-eclipse region flat and the secondary minima precisely located at the 0.5 phase of the orbital period. Consequently, it is reasonable to assume that they are detached binaries in a circular orbit. We modelled the intrinsic variability in EB LCs using the celerite package (Foreman-Mackey et al. 2017; Foreman-Mackey 2018). This package is part of the exoplanet1 package (Foreman-Mackey et al. 2021) and features a scalable Gaussian process model with a SHOTerm (a term representing a stochastically driven, damped harmonic oscillator). This package has the capability to simultaneously model the intrinsic variability with a scalable Gaussian process and the eclipses for a detached binary system. The exoplanet code employs pymc (Fonnesbeck et al. 2015) for its probabilistic modelling. It utilizes the starry package (Luger et al. 2019) to generate limb-darkened LCs and employs a fast and efficient solver for Kepler’s equations.

The q-search method (Wilson 1994; Joshi, Jagirdar & Joshi 2016a) can be employed to estimate the mass ratio (q-value) of the system in the absence of spectroscopic data. Previous studies by Liu et al. (2012) and Chehlaeh et al. (2018) calculated the mass ratio for V6 and V4, respectively, using the photometric q-search method using the phoebe 1.0 legacy version based on Wilson–Devinney code (Prša & Zwitter 2005). We used the q-values calculated for V4 and V6 from previous studies. For ZV3, we used a similar approach and calculated the q-value with phoebe 1.0. The best-fitting q-value was q = 0.48 based on the q-value versus chi-square plot, as shown in Fig. 16.

The figure shows the q (mass ratio) search for UCAC4 700–043174 (ZV3) using phoebe 1.0 legacy version. The q value with minimum $\chi ^{2}$ is marked with a asterisk and was chosen for further modelling.
Figure 16.

The figure shows the q (mass ratio) search for UCAC4 700–043174 (ZV3) using phoebe 1.0 legacy version. The q value with minimum |$\chi ^{2}$| is marked with a asterisk and was chosen for further modelling.

These photometrically derived q-values served as priors for modelling the EB LCs. The primary star’s mass was determined by comparing evolutionary tracks on the HR diagram, and the radius was calculated using the Stefan–Boltzmann’s relation, with the primary star’s temperature being the B-V colour temperature in the case of V4 and ZV3. For V6, we used the spectroscopic temperature obtained through medium-resolution spectroscopy.

Table E1 contains the prior distributions that were chosen for modelling in the exoplanet code. Table 6 provides the best-fitting parameters for binary modelling for all stars, which were compared to previous estimates by Chehlaeh et al. (2018). Figs 17, 18, and 19 depict the best-fitting LCs. Figs E1, E2, and E3 and Figs 20, E4, and E5 show the Gaussian process fits and corner plots, respectively.

The phase-folded LC of UCAC4 700–043174 (ZV3) with the best-fitting model.
Figure 17.

The phase-folded LC of UCAC4 700–043174 (ZV3) with the best-fitting model.

The phase-folded LC of V549 Aur (V4) with the best-fitting model.
Figure 18.

The phase-folded LC of V549 Aur (V4) with the best-fitting model.

The phase-folded LC of V551 Aur (V6) with the best-fitting model.
Figure 19.

The phase-folded LC of V551 Aur (V6) with the best-fitting model.

The resultant posterior distribution for the eclipse model and the Gaussian process model for the best fit from exoplanet code for V551 Aur.
Figure 20.

The resultant posterior distribution for the eclipse model and the Gaussian process model for the best fit from exoplanet code for V551 Aur.

Table 5.

The variables detected in TESS with their IDs, names (if any), the orbital or rotational period [P(d)] from TESS, the pulsational period [|$P_{\mathrm{ pul}}$|(d)] from TESS, assigned variability type, membership from Gaia DR3 (Mem.), and TESS contamination (Cont.). The error values at the last digit are represented inside brackets for the periods.

IDNameRADec.P (d)|$P_{\mathrm{ pul}}$| (d)Variability typeMem. (per cent)Cont. (per cent)
V1V546 Aur90.433 63949.941 8610.8094(2)GDOR68.70.24
V2V547 Aur90.488 97249.982 0560.9394(2)GDOR0.37
V3V548 Aur90.521 55649.819 8610.078 040(6)DSCT6.38
V4V549 Aur90.588 58349.877 1673.300 284(1)EB88.50
V5V550 Aur90.609 80649.865 8890.082 706(7)DSCT7.36
V6V551 Aur90.658 25049.884 2501.173 1767(4)0.129 453(8)EB + DSCT76.588.52
ZV1UCAC4 700–04321290.637 47249.880 1110.081 61(1)DSCT51.615.05
ZV2UCAC4 700–04317890.590 27849.873 3610.067 336(9)Hybrid38.08
ZV3UCAC4 700–04317490.584 75049.806 6113.224 040(2)EB83.759.84
N1UCAC4 700–04324590.661 13949.879 4170.073 534(4)DSCT61.865.29
N2UCAC4 700–04319690.614 05649.845 3610.068 719(9)DSCT70.710.51
83990.648 30649.920 8330.7390(3)ROT2.17
IDNameRADec.P (d)|$P_{\mathrm{ pul}}$| (d)Variability typeMem. (per cent)Cont. (per cent)
V1V546 Aur90.433 63949.941 8610.8094(2)GDOR68.70.24
V2V547 Aur90.488 97249.982 0560.9394(2)GDOR0.37
V3V548 Aur90.521 55649.819 8610.078 040(6)DSCT6.38
V4V549 Aur90.588 58349.877 1673.300 284(1)EB88.50
V5V550 Aur90.609 80649.865 8890.082 706(7)DSCT7.36
V6V551 Aur90.658 25049.884 2501.173 1767(4)0.129 453(8)EB + DSCT76.588.52
ZV1UCAC4 700–04321290.637 47249.880 1110.081 61(1)DSCT51.615.05
ZV2UCAC4 700–04317890.590 27849.873 3610.067 336(9)Hybrid38.08
ZV3UCAC4 700–04317490.584 75049.806 6113.224 040(2)EB83.759.84
N1UCAC4 700–04324590.661 13949.879 4170.073 534(4)DSCT61.865.29
N2UCAC4 700–04319690.614 05649.845 3610.068 719(9)DSCT70.710.51
83990.648 30649.920 8330.7390(3)ROT2.17

Notes. DSCT: |$\delta$| Scuti, GDOR: |$\gamma$| Doradus, EB: Eclipsing binary, and ROT: Rotational variable.

Table 5.

The variables detected in TESS with their IDs, names (if any), the orbital or rotational period [P(d)] from TESS, the pulsational period [|$P_{\mathrm{ pul}}$|(d)] from TESS, assigned variability type, membership from Gaia DR3 (Mem.), and TESS contamination (Cont.). The error values at the last digit are represented inside brackets for the periods.

IDNameRADec.P (d)|$P_{\mathrm{ pul}}$| (d)Variability typeMem. (per cent)Cont. (per cent)
V1V546 Aur90.433 63949.941 8610.8094(2)GDOR68.70.24
V2V547 Aur90.488 97249.982 0560.9394(2)GDOR0.37
V3V548 Aur90.521 55649.819 8610.078 040(6)DSCT6.38
V4V549 Aur90.588 58349.877 1673.300 284(1)EB88.50
V5V550 Aur90.609 80649.865 8890.082 706(7)DSCT7.36
V6V551 Aur90.658 25049.884 2501.173 1767(4)0.129 453(8)EB + DSCT76.588.52
ZV1UCAC4 700–04321290.637 47249.880 1110.081 61(1)DSCT51.615.05
ZV2UCAC4 700–04317890.590 27849.873 3610.067 336(9)Hybrid38.08
ZV3UCAC4 700–04317490.584 75049.806 6113.224 040(2)EB83.759.84
N1UCAC4 700–04324590.661 13949.879 4170.073 534(4)DSCT61.865.29
N2UCAC4 700–04319690.614 05649.845 3610.068 719(9)DSCT70.710.51
83990.648 30649.920 8330.7390(3)ROT2.17
IDNameRADec.P (d)|$P_{\mathrm{ pul}}$| (d)Variability typeMem. (per cent)Cont. (per cent)
V1V546 Aur90.433 63949.941 8610.8094(2)GDOR68.70.24
V2V547 Aur90.488 97249.982 0560.9394(2)GDOR0.37
V3V548 Aur90.521 55649.819 8610.078 040(6)DSCT6.38
V4V549 Aur90.588 58349.877 1673.300 284(1)EB88.50
V5V550 Aur90.609 80649.865 8890.082 706(7)DSCT7.36
V6V551 Aur90.658 25049.884 2501.173 1767(4)0.129 453(8)EB + DSCT76.588.52
ZV1UCAC4 700–04321290.637 47249.880 1110.081 61(1)DSCT51.615.05
ZV2UCAC4 700–04317890.590 27849.873 3610.067 336(9)Hybrid38.08
ZV3UCAC4 700–04317490.584 75049.806 6113.224 040(2)EB83.759.84
N1UCAC4 700–04324590.661 13949.879 4170.073 534(4)DSCT61.865.29
N2UCAC4 700–04319690.614 05649.845 3610.068 719(9)DSCT70.710.51
83990.648 30649.920 8330.7390(3)ROT2.17

Notes. DSCT: |$\delta$| Scuti, GDOR: |$\gamma$| Doradus, EB: Eclipsing binary, and ROT: Rotational variable.

Table 6.

The parameters computed with exoplanet code for ZV3, V4, and V6 are given in the table. |$T_{0}$| is the time of primary minima, q is the mass ratio, i is the inclination, k is the radius ratio, e is eccentricity, and s is the surface brightness ratio. The last two terms are the Gaussian process parameters, |$\rho _{\mathrm{ gp}}$| represents the undamped period of the oscillator and |$\sigma _{\mathrm{ gp}}$| is the standard deviation of the process.

StarParameterThis workChehlaeh et al. (2018)
 Period (d)3.224 040 (fixed)
 |$T_{0}$| (BJD)2458818.0594 (fixed)
 q0.480(5)
 i (deg)82.10(9)
ZV3k1.0(2)
 e0.04(4)
 s0.20(9)
 |$\rho _{\mathrm{ \mathrm{ gp}}}$|1.0(2)
 |$\sigma _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|1.7(2)
 Period (d)3.300 284 (fixed)3.300 281(1)
 |$T_{0}$| (BJD)2452308.388 (fixed)
 q0.626(6)0.626(7)
 i (deg)80.4(2)86.61(6)
V4k0.6(2)
 e0.13(5)0 (fixed)
 s2(1)
 |$\rho _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|0.23(2)
 |$\sigma _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|4.9(2)
 Period (d)1.173 1767 (fixed)1.173 1752(8)
 |$T_{0}$| (BJD)2452307.410 (fixed)
 q0.769(8)0.769(5)
 i (deg)61.8(7)73.01(6)
V6k0.90(9)
 e0.02(1)0 (fixed)
 s0.8(2)
 |$\rho _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|0.116(5)
 |$\sigma _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|5.3(2)
StarParameterThis workChehlaeh et al. (2018)
 Period (d)3.224 040 (fixed)
 |$T_{0}$| (BJD)2458818.0594 (fixed)
 q0.480(5)
 i (deg)82.10(9)
ZV3k1.0(2)
 e0.04(4)
 s0.20(9)
 |$\rho _{\mathrm{ \mathrm{ gp}}}$|1.0(2)
 |$\sigma _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|1.7(2)
 Period (d)3.300 284 (fixed)3.300 281(1)
 |$T_{0}$| (BJD)2452308.388 (fixed)
 q0.626(6)0.626(7)
 i (deg)80.4(2)86.61(6)
V4k0.6(2)
 e0.13(5)0 (fixed)
 s2(1)
 |$\rho _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|0.23(2)
 |$\sigma _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|4.9(2)
 Period (d)1.173 1767 (fixed)1.173 1752(8)
 |$T_{0}$| (BJD)2452307.410 (fixed)
 q0.769(8)0.769(5)
 i (deg)61.8(7)73.01(6)
V6k0.90(9)
 e0.02(1)0 (fixed)
 s0.8(2)
 |$\rho _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|0.116(5)
 |$\sigma _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|5.3(2)
Table 6.

The parameters computed with exoplanet code for ZV3, V4, and V6 are given in the table. |$T_{0}$| is the time of primary minima, q is the mass ratio, i is the inclination, k is the radius ratio, e is eccentricity, and s is the surface brightness ratio. The last two terms are the Gaussian process parameters, |$\rho _{\mathrm{ gp}}$| represents the undamped period of the oscillator and |$\sigma _{\mathrm{ gp}}$| is the standard deviation of the process.

StarParameterThis workChehlaeh et al. (2018)
 Period (d)3.224 040 (fixed)
 |$T_{0}$| (BJD)2458818.0594 (fixed)
 q0.480(5)
 i (deg)82.10(9)
ZV3k1.0(2)
 e0.04(4)
 s0.20(9)
 |$\rho _{\mathrm{ \mathrm{ gp}}}$|1.0(2)
 |$\sigma _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|1.7(2)
 Period (d)3.300 284 (fixed)3.300 281(1)
 |$T_{0}$| (BJD)2452308.388 (fixed)
 q0.626(6)0.626(7)
 i (deg)80.4(2)86.61(6)
V4k0.6(2)
 e0.13(5)0 (fixed)
 s2(1)
 |$\rho _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|0.23(2)
 |$\sigma _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|4.9(2)
 Period (d)1.173 1767 (fixed)1.173 1752(8)
 |$T_{0}$| (BJD)2452307.410 (fixed)
 q0.769(8)0.769(5)
 i (deg)61.8(7)73.01(6)
V6k0.90(9)
 e0.02(1)0 (fixed)
 s0.8(2)
 |$\rho _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|0.116(5)
 |$\sigma _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|5.3(2)
StarParameterThis workChehlaeh et al. (2018)
 Period (d)3.224 040 (fixed)
 |$T_{0}$| (BJD)2458818.0594 (fixed)
 q0.480(5)
 i (deg)82.10(9)
ZV3k1.0(2)
 e0.04(4)
 s0.20(9)
 |$\rho _{\mathrm{ \mathrm{ gp}}}$|1.0(2)
 |$\sigma _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|1.7(2)
 Period (d)3.300 284 (fixed)3.300 281(1)
 |$T_{0}$| (BJD)2452308.388 (fixed)
 q0.626(6)0.626(7)
 i (deg)80.4(2)86.61(6)
V4k0.6(2)
 e0.13(5)0 (fixed)
 s2(1)
 |$\rho _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|0.23(2)
 |$\sigma _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|4.9(2)
 Period (d)1.173 1767 (fixed)1.173 1752(8)
 |$T_{0}$| (BJD)2452307.410 (fixed)
 q0.769(8)0.769(5)
 i (deg)61.8(7)73.01(6)
V6k0.90(9)
 e0.02(1)0 (fixed)
 s0.8(2)
 |$\rho _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|0.116(5)
 |$\sigma _{\mathrm{ gp}}$|5.3(2)

8.1 V551 Aur: a pulsating eclipsing binary

V551 Aur is an EB that exhibits pulsational variability in its LC. Previous authors proposed that the variability could be due to pulsations in the binary system’s primary component. However, the nature and origin of this star’s pulsation remain poorly understood. The associated frequency, 7.7248(5), is very close to the 9th harmonic of the orbital frequency, so the pulsation may be a higher order resonance with the orbital frequency. This could indicate a tidally excited g mode on the primary star. The companions’ nature is unknown because no spectroscopic observations have been made.

As described in the previous section, we modelled both eclipses and intrinsic variability simultaneously. The pulsational frequency, first harmonics, second harmonics, and sub-harmonics were identified in the residuals of the eclipse model subtracted LC (refer to Fig. 21). The presence of a sub-harmonic frequency in the pulsation indicates that the pulsations are non-linear, which is not expected from a pure stable oscillator. This lends credence to the theory that the pulsation in one of the companions is caused by tidal forces. The ground-based phased LC (Fig. 22) shows that during the secondary eclipse, pulsations dominate, indicating that the pulsating member is the primary companion.

The top panel shows the residuals after removing the binary model from the LC of V551 Aur. Here, only the pulsation signals are seen. The bottom panel shows the frequency spectrum of the residual. Apart from the dominant peak being the pulsation frequency, one can notice the first two harmonics and a sub-harmonic in the spectrum.
Figure 21.

The top panel shows the residuals after removing the binary model from the LC of V551 Aur. Here, only the pulsation signals are seen. The bottom panel shows the frequency spectrum of the residual. Apart from the dominant peak being the pulsation frequency, one can notice the first two harmonics and a sub-harmonic in the spectrum.

Ground-based phase-folded LC of V551 Aur using the orbital period determined from TESS. The red, green, and black data points represent the data taken with 104-cm Sampurnanand, 3.6-m DOT, and 1.3-m DFOT telescopes, respectively, at ARIES, Nainital.
Figure 22.

Ground-based phase-folded LC of V551 Aur using the orbital period determined from TESS. The red, green, and black data points represent the data taken with 104-cm Sampurnanand, 3.6-m DOT, and 1.3-m DFOT telescopes, respectively, at ARIES, Nainital.

8.2 Spectroscopy

Low-resolution spectroscopic observations for V551 Aur were carried out with Himalayan Chandra telescope (HCT), Hanle Faint Object Spectrograph Camera (HFOSC; Cowsik, Srinivasan & Prabhu 2002), during 2021 and 2022. A total of 16 spectra with a resolution of R|$\sim$| 1200 were obtained during different phases of the orbital period. The radial velocities proved to be unreliable for our study because of the low resolution and due to the fact that the components’ profiles are always blended and furthermore affected by the pulsation. However, close examination of the strong Balmer lines shows significant line profile variations across different phases (see Fig. 23 for the H |$\alpha$| lines) indicating a spectroscopic binary. A series of high-resolution spectra is required to construct the star’s radial velocity curves, which will provide accurate system parameters. Because we do not have direct access to the spectroscopic observational facilities required to observe a 14th magnitude star, we propose this as a future project. We used the low-resolution spectra to determine the basic parameters of the star by comparison with synthetic spectra (Table F1), using the chi-square minimization technique employed in gssp code (Tkachenko 2015).

The H $\alpha$ line of low-resolution spectra at different phases obtained with HFOSC equipped on HCT. The normalized flux for each spectrum was added by 0.1 for visual clarity. The phase increases from 0 to 1 from bottom to top.
Figure 23.

The H |$\alpha$| line of low-resolution spectra at different phases obtained with HFOSC equipped on HCT. The normalized flux for each spectrum was added by 0.1 for visual clarity. The phase increases from 0 to 1 from bottom to top.

A medium-resolution spectrum was taken with the 2.4-m telescope, Thailand National Observatory, Thailand, Medium-Resolution Spectrograph with a resolution of R  |$\sim$| 18 000 over a range of 380–900 nm. The H |$\beta$| line (Fig. 24) was used to calculate the |$T_{\rm eff}$| and |$\log g$| by comparison with synthetic spectra using the gssp code. Due to binarity and poor resolution, the metallicity estimation is unreliable and cannot be compared to the cluster metallicity. To improve the SNR of the line profile, we applied the least-squares deconvolution (LSD) method (Donati et al. 1997). The LSD profile (Fig. 25) was used to calculate the |$v\sin i$| and radial velocity of the star. The best-fitting results of our analysis are presented in Table 7.

The top panel shows the H $\beta$ line (black) of the medium-resolution spectrum acquired for V551 Aur at an orbital phase 0.96 and the best-fitting synthetic spectrum (red). The bottom panel shows the residuals of the fit.
Figure 24.

The top panel shows the H |$\beta$| line (black) of the medium-resolution spectrum acquired for V551 Aur at an orbital phase 0.96 and the best-fitting synthetic spectrum (red). The bottom panel shows the residuals of the fit.

The top panel shows the mean LSD profile of the medium-resolution spectra (square marker) for V551 Aur. A rotationally broadened line profile (solid curve) was fit to these data to find $v \sin i$ and radial velocity. The bottom panel gives the residuals of the fit.
Figure 25.

The top panel shows the mean LSD profile of the medium-resolution spectra (square marker) for V551 Aur. A rotationally broadened line profile (solid curve) was fit to these data to find |$v \sin i$| and radial velocity. The bottom panel gives the residuals of the fit.

Table 7.

The table shows the spectroscopic parameters that were found for V551 Aur using the medium-resolution spectrum. The parameters were found by fitting synthetic spectra to the H |$\beta$| line and line profile fitting to the LSD profile.

ParametersH βLSD
|$T_{\rm eff}$|6458 |$\pm$| 361 K
|$\log g$|3.0 |$\pm$| 1.49
RV–8.4 |$\pm$| 1.2 km s−1
|$v\sin i$|44.0 |$\pm$| 2.5 km s−1
ParametersH βLSD
|$T_{\rm eff}$|6458 |$\pm$| 361 K
|$\log g$|3.0 |$\pm$| 1.49
RV–8.4 |$\pm$| 1.2 km s−1
|$v\sin i$|44.0 |$\pm$| 2.5 km s−1
Table 7.

The table shows the spectroscopic parameters that were found for V551 Aur using the medium-resolution spectrum. The parameters were found by fitting synthetic spectra to the H |$\beta$| line and line profile fitting to the LSD profile.

ParametersH βLSD
|$T_{\rm eff}$|6458 |$\pm$| 361 K
|$\log g$|3.0 |$\pm$| 1.49
RV–8.4 |$\pm$| 1.2 km s−1
|$v\sin i$|44.0 |$\pm$| 2.5 km s−1
ParametersH βLSD
|$T_{\rm eff}$|6458 |$\pm$| 361 K
|$\log g$|3.0 |$\pm$| 1.49
RV–8.4 |$\pm$| 1.2 km s−1
|$v\sin i$|44.0 |$\pm$| 2.5 km s−1

9 SUMMARY

Our ground-based observations revealed 25 member variables and 85 field variables within a 9 arcmin radius field of NGC 2126. Our research was focused on member variables and stars with promising LCs in the TESS data. We discovered 18 new variable cluster members from the ground.

In TESS, we identified counterparts for 11 known variables, including 6 members and 5 field stars. Furthermore, we identified a new field star as a rotational variable based on TESS LC. TESS frequency spectra show distinctive pulsation peaks, especially for |$\delta$| Scuti stars. These frequencies can be used to conduct asteroseismic studies on member pulsating stars. Aside from that, the cluster has a higher metallicity than the solar metallicity, implying the presence of chemically peculiar stars in the cluster. Thus, a spectroscopic investigation can benefit our understanding of the member variables.

We attempted to solve the TESS contamination problem by using custom apertures for our sources and cross-matching detected frequencies to ground-based frequencies. This method was useful for stars that produced strong signals in TESS.

We used TESS data to model the EBs V4, V6, and ZV3 by combining their TESS LCs. However, this model still lacks the support of spectroscopic radial velocity measurements. Due to a lack of data, ZV3 had not previously been modelled or its orbital period determined. We utilized the continuous LCs from TESS data to model this star, thereby establishing the linear ephemeris and determining the orbital period.

The intrinsic variability and eclipses of the pulsating EB V551 Aur were modelled simultaneously to determine its parameters. This resulted in slightly different parameter estimates than those reported in previous literature. The low-resolution spectroscopy confirms the spectral line profile variation for this system, indicating that it is a spectroscopic binary. The medium-resolution spectra provided better estimates of spectroscopic parameters for V551 Aur.

10 CONCLUSIONS

This project was initiated to search and study pulsating variables in the open star cluster NGC 2126, utilizing ground-based observations, Gaia data, and TESS FFIs for improved analysis. This study led us to draw the following conclusions:

  • Our study demonstrates that TESS LCs alone are unreliable in the case of open clusters due to contamination. To address this issue and fully utilize the TESS data, one must integrate Gaia data and ground-based observations. This allows us to identify contaminated sources and make better use of the frequency resolution provided by TESS.

  • V551 Aur, which was known to exhibit pulsations in one of its components, was found to be a spectroscopic binary with membership to the cluster. To understand this system and model it accurately, high-resolution spectroscopic follow-up observations covering this star’s orbital phase are required. Due to the star’s faintness, we intend to use observations with a larger aperture telescope.

From isochrone fitting, we determined log age |$\sim$| 9.2, a metallicity |$\sim$|0.016, and a distance |$\sim$|1.2 kpc for the cluster. Our results are in agreement with previous determinations from Chehlaeh et al. (2018), but with slight differences (log age |$\sim$| 9.1, Z|$\sim$| 0.019, and d|$\sim$| 1.4 kpc in Chehlaeh et al. 2018), possibly due to the improved magnitude, colour, proper motion, and parallax from Gaia.

Our observations of NGC 2126 are limited to a few nights. More observations are required for a detailed frequency analysis of the detected targets. Therefore, we plan to conduct further observations for the cluster using the observing facilities at ARIES, Nainital.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to the Indian and Belgian funding agencies Department of Science and Technology (DST) (DST/INT/Belg/P-09/2017) and Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO) (BL/33/IN12) for providing financial support to carry out this work. AD acknowledges the financial support received from Department of Science and Technology's Innovation in Science Pursuit for Inspired Research (DST-INSPIRE) Fellowship Programme (No. DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2020/IF200245).

DATA AVAILABILITY

The data underlying this article will be shared upon request to the corresponding author. The observations reported in this paper were obtained using the 1.04 m ST, 1.3 m DFOT and 3.6 m DOT telescopes at ARIES, Nainital, India , the 2 m HCT at IAO, Hanle, the High Altitude Station of Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore, India and 2.4 m telescope at Thai National Observatory (TNO), Chiang Mai, Thailand. This research has made use of the 'Set of Identifications, Measurements and Bibliography for Astronomical Data' (SIMBAD) database operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. This work has made use of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission Gaia (https://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia), processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC; https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/consortium). Funding for the DPAC has been provided by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the Gaia Multilateral Agreement. This paper includes data collected by the TESS mission, which are publicly available from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST) at the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI).

Footnotes

REFERENCES

Aerts
 
C.
,
2021
,
Rev. Mod. Phys.
,
93
,
015001
 

Aerts
 
C.
,
Christensen-Dalsgaard
 
J.
,
Kurtz
 
D. W.
,
2010
,
Asteroseismology
.
Springer
,
Berlin
 

Ashoka
 
B. N.
 et al. ,
2000
,
Bull. Astron. Soc. India
,
28
,
251

Balona
 
L. A.
,
2013
,
MNRAS
,
431
,
2240
 

Bedding
 
T. R.
 et al. ,
2023
,
ApJ
,
946
,
L10
 

Brasseur
 
C. E.
,
Phillip
 
C.
,
Fleming
 
S. W.
,
Mullally
 
S. E.
,
White
 
R. L.
,
2019
,
Astrophysics Source Code Library
,
record ascl:1905.007

Bressan
 
A.
,
Marigo
 
P.
,
Girardi
 
L.
,
Salasnich
 
B.
,
Dal Cero
 
C.
,
Rubele
 
S.
,
Nanni
 
A.
,
2012
,
MNRAS
,
427
,
127
 

Charbonneau
 
P.
,
1995
,
ApJS
,
101
,
309
 

Chehlaeh
 
N.
,
Mkrtichian
 
D.
,
Lampens
 
P.
,
Komonjinda
 
S.
,
Kim
 
S. L.
,
Van Cauteren
 
P.
,
Kusakin
 
A. V.
,
Glazunova
 
L.
,
2018
,
MNRAS
,
480
,
1850
 

Chen
 
Y.
,
Girardi
 
L.
,
Bressan
 
A.
,
Marigo
 
P.
,
Barbieri
 
M.
,
Kong
 
X.
,
2014
,
MNRAS
,
444
,
2525
 

Chen
 
Y.
,
Bressan
 
A.
,
Girardi
 
L.
,
Marigo
 
P.
,
Kong
 
X.
,
Lanza
 
A.
,
2015
,
MNRAS
,
452
,
1068
 

Cowsik
 
R.
,
Srinivasan
 
R.
,
Prabhu
 
T.
,
2002
, in
Vernin
 
J.
,
Benkhaldoun
 
Z.
,
Muñoz-Tuñón
 
C.
, eds,
ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 266, Astronomical Site Evaluation in the Visible and Radio Range
.
Astron. Soc. Pac
,
San Francisco
, p.
424

Danielski
 
C.
,
Babusiaux
 
C.
,
Ruiz-Dern
 
L.
,
Sartoretti
 
P.
,
Arenou
 
F.
,
2018
,
A&A
,
614
,
A19
 

Deb
 
S.
,
Singh
 
H. P.
,
2009
,
A&A
,
507
,
1729
 

Dileep
 
A.
,
Joshi
 
S.
,
Kurtz
 
D. W.
,
2024
,
Bull. Soc. R. Sci. Liege
,
93
,
227
 

Donati
 
J. F.
,
Semel
 
M.
,
Carter
 
B. D.
,
Rees
 
D. E.
,
Collier Cameron
 
A.
,
1997
,
MNRAS
,
291
,
658
 

Dupret
 
M. A.
,
Grigahcène
 
A.
,
Garrido
 
R.
,
Gabriel
 
M.
,
Scuflaire
 
R.
,
2005
,
A&A
,
435
,
927
 

Feinstein
 
A. D.
 et al. ,
2019
,
PASP
,
131
,
094502
 

Fonnesbeck
 
C.
,
Patil
 
A.
,
Huard
 
D.
,
Salvatier
 
J.
,
2015
,
Astrophysics Source Code Library
,
record ascl:1506.005

Foreman-Mackey
 
D.
,
2018
,
Res. Notes Am. Astron. Soc.
,
2
,
31
 

Foreman-Mackey
 
D.
,
Agol
 
E.
,
Ambikasaran
 
S.
,
Angus
 
R.
,
2017
,
AJ
,
154
,
220
 

Foreman-Mackey
 
D.
 et al. ,
2021
,
J. Open Source Softw.
,
6
,
3285

Gaia Collaboration
,
2016
,
A&A
,
595
,
A1
 

Gaia Collaboration
,
2023
,
A&A
,
674
,
A1
 

Gáspár
 
A.
 et al. ,
2003
,
A&A
,
410
,
879
 

Han
 
T.
,
Brandt
 
T. D.
,
2023
,
AJ
,
165
,
71
 

Handler
 
G.
 et al. ,
2009
,
ApJ
,
698
,
L56
 

Joshi
 
S.
 et al. ,
2003
,
MNRAS
,
344
,
431
 

Joshi
 
S.
,
Mary
 
D. L.
,
Martinez
 
P.
,
Kurtz
 
D. W.
,
Girish
 
V.
,
Seetha
 
S.
,
Sagar
 
R.
,
Ashoka
 
B. N.
,
2006
,
A&A
,
455
,
303
 

Joshi
 
S.
,
Mary
 
D. L.
,
Chakradhari
 
N. K.
,
Tiwari
 
S. K.
,
Billaud
 
C.
,
2009
,
A&A
,
507
,
1763
 

Joshi
 
S.
,
Ryabchikova
 
T.
,
Kochukhov
 
O.
,
Sachkov
 
M.
,
Tiwari
 
S. K.
,
Chakradhari
 
N. K.
,
Piskunov
 
N.
,
2010
,
MNRAS
,
401
,
1299
 

Joshi
 
S.
 et al. ,
2012
,
MNRAS
,
424
,
2002
 

Joshi
 
Y. C.
,
Jagirdar
 
R.
,
Joshi
 
S.
,
2016a
,
Res. Astron. Astrophys.
,
16
,
63
 

Joshi
 
S.
 et al. ,
2016b
,
A&A
,
590
,
A116
 

Joshi
 
S.
,
Semenko
 
E.
,
Moiseeva
 
A.
,
Sharma
 
K.
,
Joshi
 
Y. C.
,
Sachkov
 
M.
,
Singh
 
H. P.
,
Yerra
 
B. K.
,
2017
,
MNRAS
,
467
,
633
 

Joshi
 
Y. C.
,
Maurya
 
J.
,
John
 
A. A.
,
Panchal
 
A.
,
Joshi
 
S.
,
Kumar
 
B.
,
2020a
,
MNRAS
,
492
,
3602
 

Joshi
 
Y. C.
,
John
 
A. A.
,
Maurya
 
J.
,
Panchal
 
A.
,
Kumar
 
B.
,
Joshi
 
S.
,
2020b
,
MNRAS
,
499
,
618
 

Joshi
 
Y. C.
,
Bangia
 
T.
,
Jaiswar
 
M. K.
,
Pant
 
J.
,
Reddy
 
K.
,
Yadav
 
S.
,
2022a
,
J. Astron. Instrum.
,
11
,
2240004
 

Joshi
 
S.
 et al. ,
2022b
,
MNRAS
,
510
,
5854
 

King
 
I.
,
1962
,
AJ
,
67
,
471
 

Kumar
 
B.
 et al. ,
2018
,
Bull. Soc. R. Sci. Liege
,
87
,
29

Lampens
 
P.
,
2021
,
Galaxies
,
9
,
28
 

Landolt
 
A. U.
,
1992
,
AJ
,
104
,
340
 

Lata
 
S.
 et al. ,
2023
,
MNRAS
,
520
,
1092
 

Lenz
 
P.
,
Breger
 
M.
,
2004
, in
Zverko
 
J.
,
Ziznovsky
 
J.
,
Adelman
 
S. J.
,
Weiss
 
W. W.
, eds,
Proc. IAU Symp. 224, The A-Star Puzzle
.
Cambridge Univ. Press
,
Cambridge
, p.
786
 

Li
 
G.
 et al. ,
2024
,
A&A
,
686
,
A142
 

Lightkurve Collaboration
,
2018
,
Astrophysics Source Code Library
,
record ascl:1812.013

Liu
 
N.
,
Zhang
 
X.-B.
,
Ren
 
A.-B.
,
Deng
 
L.-C.
,
Luo
 
Z.-Q.
,
2012
,
Res. Astron. Astrophys.
,
12
,
671
 

Luger
 
R.
,
Agol
 
E.
,
Foreman-Mackey
 
D.
,
Fleming
 
D. P.
,
Lustig-Yaeger
 
J.
,
Deitrick
 
R.
,
2019
,
AJ
,
157
,
64
 

Mamajek
 
E. E.
,
Hillenbrand
 
L. A.
,
2008
,
ApJ
,
687
,
1264
 

Martinez
 
P.
 et al. ,
2001
,
A&A
,
371
,
1048
 

Maurya
 
J.
,
Joshi
 
Y. C.
,
Panchal
 
A.
,
Gour
 
A. S.
,
2023
,
AJ
,
165
,
90
 

Montgomery
 
M. H.
,
O’Donoghue
 
D.
,
1999
,
Delta Scuti Star Newsl.
,
13
,
28

Murphy
 
S. J.
,
Zenodo
 
Geneva, Switzerland
 
2019
, Pulsating Stars in Binary Systems: A Review,

Pamos Ortega
 
D.
,
Mirouh
 
G. M.
,
García Hernández
 
A.
,
Suárez Yanes
 
J. C.
,
Barceló Forteza
 
S.
,
2023
,
A&A
,
675
,
A167
 

Pamyatnykh
 
A. A.
,
2000
, in
Breger
 
M.
,
Montgomery
 
M.
, eds,
ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 210, Delta Scuti and Related Stars
.
Astron. Soc. Pac
,
San Francisco
, p.
215
 

Panchal
 
A.
,
Joshi
 
Y. C.
,
De Cat
 
P.
,
Lampens
 
P.
,
Goswami
 
A.
,
Tiwari
 
S. N.
,
2023
,
MNRAS
,
521
,
677
 

Pandey
 
S. B.
,
Yadav
 
R. K. S.
,
Nanjappa
 
N.
,
Yadav
 
S.
,
Reddy
 
B. K.
,
Sahu
 
S.
,
Srinivasan
 
R.
,
2018
,
Bull. Soc. R. Sci. Liege
,
87
,
42
 

Perren
 
G. I.
,
Vázquez
 
R. A.
,
Piatti
 
A. E.
,
2015
,
A&A
,
576
,
A6
 

Pigulski
 
A.
,
2006
, in
Aerts
 
C.
,
Sterken
 
C.
, eds,
ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 349, Astrophysics of Variable Stars
.
Astron. Soc. Pac
,
San Francisco
, p.
137

Poznanski
 
D.
,
Prochaska
 
J. X.
,
Bloom
 
J. S.
,
2012
,
MNRAS
,
426
,
1465
 

Prša
 
A.
,
Zwitter
 
T.
,
2005
,
ApJ
,
628
,
426
 

Ricker
 
G. R.
,
2014
,
J. Am. Assoc. Var. Star Obs.
,
42
,
234

Sarkar
 
M.
 et al.  
534
:
3211
3220
.,
2024
,
MNRAS
.

Stetson
 
P. B.
,
1987
,
PASP
,
99
,
191
 

Stetson
 
P. B.
,
1992
, in
Worrall
 
D. M.
,
Biemesderfer
 
C.
,
Barnes
 
J.
, eds,
ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 25, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems I
.
Astronomical Society of the Pacific
,
San Francisco
,
297

Tang
 
J.
,
Bressan
 
A.
,
Rosenfield
 
P.
,
Slemer
 
A.
,
Marigo
 
P.
,
Girardi
 
L.
,
Bianchi
 
L.
,
2014
,
MNRAS
,
445
,
4287
 

Tkachenko
 
A.
,
2015
,
A&A
,
581
,
A129
 

Torres
 
G.
,
2010
,
AJ
,
140
,
1158
 

Trust
 
O.
,
Jurua
 
E.
,
De Cat
 
P.
,
Joshi
 
S.
,
Lampens
 
P.
,
2021
,
MNRAS
,
504
,
5528
 

Trust
 
O.
,
Mashonkina
 
L.
,
Jurua
 
E.
,
De Cat
 
P.
,
Tsymbal
 
V.
,
Joshi
 
S.
,
2023
,
MNRAS
,
524
,
1044
 

Wilson
 
R. E.
,
1994
,
PASP
,
106
,
921
 

Wu
 
Z. Y.
,
Tian
 
K. P.
,
Balaguer-Núñez
 
L.
,
Jordi
 
C.
,
Zhao
 
L.
,
Guibert
 
J.
,
2002
,
A&A
,
381
,
464
 

Yadav
 
R. K. S.
 et al. ,
2022
,
J. Astron. Instrum.
,
11
,
2240006
 

Zhang
 
X. B.
,
Deng
 
L. C.
,
Luo
 
C. Q.
,
2012
,
AJ
,
144
,
141
 

Zong
 
W.
,
Charpinet
 
S.
,
Vauclair
 
G.
,
Giammichele
 
N.
,
Van Grootel
 
V.
,
2016
,
A&A
,
585
,
A22
 

APPENDIX A: FIELD STARS

The phased V-band LCs of newly detected field variables in NGC 2126. Their respective IDs and periods are given as the title of each figure.
Figure A1.

The phased V-band LCs of newly detected field variables in NGC 2126. Their respective IDs and periods are given as the title of each figure.

New variables – continued.
Figure A2.

New variables – continued.

New variables – continued.
Figure A3.

New variables – continued.

New variables – continued.
Figure A4.

New variables – continued.

New variables – continued.
Figure A5.

New variables – continued.

Table A1.

The newly detected field variables from ground observations are listed with their ID, corrected magnitude, dominant frequency detected, and their corresponding amplitudes.

IDRADec.Mag (mag)Frequency (d−1)Amp (mag)IDRADec.Mag (mag)Frequency (d−1)Amp (mag)
590.693 52849.732 83317.2722.3400.02753690.857 77849.880 41716.2012.1970.010
4290.818 58349.742 38918.3030.5130.07355590.452 55649.881 36115.8402.7340.011
4390.720 02849.742 27817.4850.5110.06355790.442 91749.881 52817.6272.6340.020
6990.807 36149.751 94418.1221.9920.06256490.689 05649.884 47213.5881.7290.011
9690.649 44449.760 16718.4652.0420.03657890.490 91749.884 13916.3783.1970.010
10190.792 97249.763 16718.0830.8740.07558390.712 94449.886 38915.9410.2190.013
11390.806 66749.766 19418.3012.2650.03364990.758 22249.895 19417.8273.3910.030
12290.430 19449.766 19414.9581.8980.02266790.747 58349.896 77815.4181.3740.013
13290.841 66749.771 61116.4582.4870.01867390.831 52849.897 77816.1884.9810.012
16190.663 66749.781 61117.4502.2580.03868590.529 55649.897 19415.4572.6770.008
17490.683 97249.786 63916.9781.6150.03476390.857 11149.911 80618.2982.2280.120
18190.815 61149.789 61116.5201.9720.02478090.870 33349.913 63918.9242.5080.048
18890.691 63949.793 50014.8272.1120.01878590.445 63949.911 38917.48010.3180.020
19190.770 58349.794 66716.3121.6150.03179090.626 97249.913 19419.2993.5000.073
19490.868 00049.795 33315.8802.4870.01879690.487 86149.912 88915.6301.6900.006
23690.814 27849.806 94416.7931.9780.01681790.450 55649.915 83316.5515.1110.008
23990.580 36149.805 83315.7272.1120.01183290.689 08349.920 19416.6107.9700.015
25890.855 11149.812 94418.1851.9850.05083590.456 44449.918 83316.6674.2600.012
26490.769 75049.813 58315.5411.9960.01185490.704 52849.925 22217.7142.4240.052
26790.624 27849.813 19416.5571.8750.03085690.469 88949.923 41715.6343.7220.010
27390.665 05649.814 77818.3061.8320.03086690.495 30649.926 91714.4980.5330.019
28090.606 86149.816 02814.4002.4960.00791090.795 61149.939 80616.2962.2250.029
28390.738 27849.816 97215.9301.8300.01792590.532 19449.941 66717.3253.7800.020
29390.554 94449.819 47216.6882.5330.01793690.445 55649.944 22214.0310.2150.005
30090.638 72249.821 00014.7761.6850.00995190.835 22249.951 38914.3482.2510.012
30290.700 75049.822 22216.7362.2870.02083690.466 11149.919 11117.2834.2170.015
33190.569 38949.829 27816.6392.3900.016103990.521 86149.974 75015.7122.2630.018
39490.775 91749.849 88917.1451.9730.017101990.484 41749.969 27819.4701.9320.126
41190.622 75049.853 27815.9262.5020.013105090.847 75049.978 33313.0202.1040.014
41990.515 72249.854 00016.9232.1120.025105590.858 41749.980 88916.4892.5380.019
42090.546 16749.854 91714.8622.2810.007107290.555 86149.983 94415.4673.7640.007
42190.842 77849.857 05615.7321.9730.011124490.781 13950.027 38917.7332.8430.033
43190.828 19449.858 47215.2472.8400.018126690.614 13950.031 25019.60210.6370.054
45690.637 58349.862 13916.4863.9670.011126790.747 30650.032 41718.74811.2700.035
45990.705 75049.863 69418.5432.5880.040119690.541 77850.012 44414.8871.7750.017
47090.518 77849.864 22214.7982.5000.007107590.873 50049.987 52817.2402.2630.019
48990.530 83349.868 66716.6495.0080.008107990.830 77849.988 19413.0162.2870.015
50390.469 33349.871 41715.5472.6080.016109590.619 69449.991 05616.1974.4030.010
52190.653 47249.876 08315.5785.3060.005110290.526 80649.991 80618.7451.8290.083
52990.475 61149.875 66716.7452.5730.015118990.456 47250.010 61116.3401.9310.015
IDRADec.Mag (mag)Frequency (d−1)Amp (mag)IDRADec.Mag (mag)Frequency (d−1)Amp (mag)
590.693 52849.732 83317.2722.3400.02753690.857 77849.880 41716.2012.1970.010
4290.818 58349.742 38918.3030.5130.07355590.452 55649.881 36115.8402.7340.011
4390.720 02849.742 27817.4850.5110.06355790.442 91749.881 52817.6272.6340.020
6990.807 36149.751 94418.1221.9920.06256490.689 05649.884 47213.5881.7290.011
9690.649 44449.760 16718.4652.0420.03657890.490 91749.884 13916.3783.1970.010
10190.792 97249.763 16718.0830.8740.07558390.712 94449.886 38915.9410.2190.013
11390.806 66749.766 19418.3012.2650.03364990.758 22249.895 19417.8273.3910.030
12290.430 19449.766 19414.9581.8980.02266790.747 58349.896 77815.4181.3740.013
13290.841 66749.771 61116.4582.4870.01867390.831 52849.897 77816.1884.9810.012
16190.663 66749.781 61117.4502.2580.03868590.529 55649.897 19415.4572.6770.008
17490.683 97249.786 63916.9781.6150.03476390.857 11149.911 80618.2982.2280.120
18190.815 61149.789 61116.5201.9720.02478090.870 33349.913 63918.9242.5080.048
18890.691 63949.793 50014.8272.1120.01878590.445 63949.911 38917.48010.3180.020
19190.770 58349.794 66716.3121.6150.03179090.626 97249.913 19419.2993.5000.073
19490.868 00049.795 33315.8802.4870.01879690.487 86149.912 88915.6301.6900.006
23690.814 27849.806 94416.7931.9780.01681790.450 55649.915 83316.5515.1110.008
23990.580 36149.805 83315.7272.1120.01183290.689 08349.920 19416.6107.9700.015
25890.855 11149.812 94418.1851.9850.05083590.456 44449.918 83316.6674.2600.012
26490.769 75049.813 58315.5411.9960.01185490.704 52849.925 22217.7142.4240.052
26790.624 27849.813 19416.5571.8750.03085690.469 88949.923 41715.6343.7220.010
27390.665 05649.814 77818.3061.8320.03086690.495 30649.926 91714.4980.5330.019
28090.606 86149.816 02814.4002.4960.00791090.795 61149.939 80616.2962.2250.029
28390.738 27849.816 97215.9301.8300.01792590.532 19449.941 66717.3253.7800.020
29390.554 94449.819 47216.6882.5330.01793690.445 55649.944 22214.0310.2150.005
30090.638 72249.821 00014.7761.6850.00995190.835 22249.951 38914.3482.2510.012
30290.700 75049.822 22216.7362.2870.02083690.466 11149.919 11117.2834.2170.015
33190.569 38949.829 27816.6392.3900.016103990.521 86149.974 75015.7122.2630.018
39490.775 91749.849 88917.1451.9730.017101990.484 41749.969 27819.4701.9320.126
41190.622 75049.853 27815.9262.5020.013105090.847 75049.978 33313.0202.1040.014
41990.515 72249.854 00016.9232.1120.025105590.858 41749.980 88916.4892.5380.019
42090.546 16749.854 91714.8622.2810.007107290.555 86149.983 94415.4673.7640.007
42190.842 77849.857 05615.7321.9730.011124490.781 13950.027 38917.7332.8430.033
43190.828 19449.858 47215.2472.8400.018126690.614 13950.031 25019.60210.6370.054
45690.637 58349.862 13916.4863.9670.011126790.747 30650.032 41718.74811.2700.035
45990.705 75049.863 69418.5432.5880.040119690.541 77850.012 44414.8871.7750.017
47090.518 77849.864 22214.7982.5000.007107590.873 50049.987 52817.2402.2630.019
48990.530 83349.868 66716.6495.0080.008107990.830 77849.988 19413.0162.2870.015
50390.469 33349.871 41715.5472.6080.016109590.619 69449.991 05616.1974.4030.010
52190.653 47249.876 08315.5785.3060.005110290.526 80649.991 80618.7451.8290.083
52990.475 61149.875 66716.7452.5730.015118990.456 47250.010 61116.3401.9310.015
Table A1.

The newly detected field variables from ground observations are listed with their ID, corrected magnitude, dominant frequency detected, and their corresponding amplitudes.

IDRADec.Mag (mag)Frequency (d−1)Amp (mag)IDRADec.Mag (mag)Frequency (d−1)Amp (mag)
590.693 52849.732 83317.2722.3400.02753690.857 77849.880 41716.2012.1970.010
4290.818 58349.742 38918.3030.5130.07355590.452 55649.881 36115.8402.7340.011
4390.720 02849.742 27817.4850.5110.06355790.442 91749.881 52817.6272.6340.020
6990.807 36149.751 94418.1221.9920.06256490.689 05649.884 47213.5881.7290.011
9690.649 44449.760 16718.4652.0420.03657890.490 91749.884 13916.3783.1970.010
10190.792 97249.763 16718.0830.8740.07558390.712 94449.886 38915.9410.2190.013
11390.806 66749.766 19418.3012.2650.03364990.758 22249.895 19417.8273.3910.030
12290.430 19449.766 19414.9581.8980.02266790.747 58349.896 77815.4181.3740.013
13290.841 66749.771 61116.4582.4870.01867390.831 52849.897 77816.1884.9810.012
16190.663 66749.781 61117.4502.2580.03868590.529 55649.897 19415.4572.6770.008
17490.683 97249.786 63916.9781.6150.03476390.857 11149.911 80618.2982.2280.120
18190.815 61149.789 61116.5201.9720.02478090.870 33349.913 63918.9242.5080.048
18890.691 63949.793 50014.8272.1120.01878590.445 63949.911 38917.48010.3180.020
19190.770 58349.794 66716.3121.6150.03179090.626 97249.913 19419.2993.5000.073
19490.868 00049.795 33315.8802.4870.01879690.487 86149.912 88915.6301.6900.006
23690.814 27849.806 94416.7931.9780.01681790.450 55649.915 83316.5515.1110.008
23990.580 36149.805 83315.7272.1120.01183290.689 08349.920 19416.6107.9700.015
25890.855 11149.812 94418.1851.9850.05083590.456 44449.918 83316.6674.2600.012
26490.769 75049.813 58315.5411.9960.01185490.704 52849.925 22217.7142.4240.052
26790.624 27849.813 19416.5571.8750.03085690.469 88949.923 41715.6343.7220.010
27390.665 05649.814 77818.3061.8320.03086690.495 30649.926 91714.4980.5330.019
28090.606 86149.816 02814.4002.4960.00791090.795 61149.939 80616.2962.2250.029
28390.738 27849.816 97215.9301.8300.01792590.532 19449.941 66717.3253.7800.020
29390.554 94449.819 47216.6882.5330.01793690.445 55649.944 22214.0310.2150.005
30090.638 72249.821 00014.7761.6850.00995190.835 22249.951 38914.3482.2510.012
30290.700 75049.822 22216.7362.2870.02083690.466 11149.919 11117.2834.2170.015
33190.569 38949.829 27816.6392.3900.016103990.521 86149.974 75015.7122.2630.018
39490.775 91749.849 88917.1451.9730.017101990.484 41749.969 27819.4701.9320.126
41190.622 75049.853 27815.9262.5020.013105090.847 75049.978 33313.0202.1040.014
41990.515 72249.854 00016.9232.1120.025105590.858 41749.980 88916.4892.5380.019
42090.546 16749.854 91714.8622.2810.007107290.555 86149.983 94415.4673.7640.007
42190.842 77849.857 05615.7321.9730.011124490.781 13950.027 38917.7332.8430.033
43190.828 19449.858 47215.2472.8400.018126690.614 13950.031 25019.60210.6370.054
45690.637 58349.862 13916.4863.9670.011126790.747 30650.032 41718.74811.2700.035
45990.705 75049.863 69418.5432.5880.040119690.541 77850.012 44414.8871.7750.017
47090.518 77849.864 22214.7982.5000.007107590.873 50049.987 52817.2402.2630.019
48990.530 83349.868 66716.6495.0080.008107990.830 77849.988 19413.0162.2870.015
50390.469 33349.871 41715.5472.6080.016109590.619 69449.991 05616.1974.4030.010
52190.653 47249.876 08315.5785.3060.005110290.526 80649.991 80618.7451.8290.083
52990.475 61149.875 66716.7452.5730.015118990.456 47250.010 61116.3401.9310.015
IDRADec.Mag (mag)Frequency (d−1)Amp (mag)IDRADec.Mag (mag)Frequency (d−1)Amp (mag)
590.693 52849.732 83317.2722.3400.02753690.857 77849.880 41716.2012.1970.010
4290.818 58349.742 38918.3030.5130.07355590.452 55649.881 36115.8402.7340.011
4390.720 02849.742 27817.4850.5110.06355790.442 91749.881 52817.6272.6340.020
6990.807 36149.751 94418.1221.9920.06256490.689 05649.884 47213.5881.7290.011
9690.649 44449.760 16718.4652.0420.03657890.490 91749.884 13916.3783.1970.010
10190.792 97249.763 16718.0830.8740.07558390.712 94449.886 38915.9410.2190.013
11390.806 66749.766 19418.3012.2650.03364990.758 22249.895 19417.8273.3910.030
12290.430 19449.766 19414.9581.8980.02266790.747 58349.896 77815.4181.3740.013
13290.841 66749.771 61116.4582.4870.01867390.831 52849.897 77816.1884.9810.012
16190.663 66749.781 61117.4502.2580.03868590.529 55649.897 19415.4572.6770.008
17490.683 97249.786 63916.9781.6150.03476390.857 11149.911 80618.2982.2280.120
18190.815 61149.789 61116.5201.9720.02478090.870 33349.913 63918.9242.5080.048
18890.691 63949.793 50014.8272.1120.01878590.445 63949.911 38917.48010.3180.020
19190.770 58349.794 66716.3121.6150.03179090.626 97249.913 19419.2993.5000.073
19490.868 00049.795 33315.8802.4870.01879690.487 86149.912 88915.6301.6900.006
23690.814 27849.806 94416.7931.9780.01681790.450 55649.915 83316.5515.1110.008
23990.580 36149.805 83315.7272.1120.01183290.689 08349.920 19416.6107.9700.015
25890.855 11149.812 94418.1851.9850.05083590.456 44449.918 83316.6674.2600.012
26490.769 75049.813 58315.5411.9960.01185490.704 52849.925 22217.7142.4240.052
26790.624 27849.813 19416.5571.8750.03085690.469 88949.923 41715.6343.7220.010
27390.665 05649.814 77818.3061.8320.03086690.495 30649.926 91714.4980.5330.019
28090.606 86149.816 02814.4002.4960.00791090.795 61149.939 80616.2962.2250.029
28390.738 27849.816 97215.9301.8300.01792590.532 19449.941 66717.3253.7800.020
29390.554 94449.819 47216.6882.5330.01793690.445 55649.944 22214.0310.2150.005
30090.638 72249.821 00014.7761.6850.00995190.835 22249.951 38914.3482.2510.012
30290.700 75049.822 22216.7362.2870.02083690.466 11149.919 11117.2834.2170.015
33190.569 38949.829 27816.6392.3900.016103990.521 86149.974 75015.7122.2630.018
39490.775 91749.849 88917.1451.9730.017101990.484 41749.969 27819.4701.9320.126
41190.622 75049.853 27815.9262.5020.013105090.847 75049.978 33313.0202.1040.014
41990.515 72249.854 00016.9232.1120.025105590.858 41749.980 88916.4892.5380.019
42090.546 16749.854 91714.8622.2810.007107290.555 86149.983 94415.4673.7640.007
42190.842 77849.857 05615.7321.9730.011124490.781 13950.027 38917.7332.8430.033
43190.828 19449.858 47215.2472.8400.018126690.614 13950.031 25019.60210.6370.054
45690.637 58349.862 13916.4863.9670.011126790.747 30650.032 41718.74811.2700.035
45990.705 75049.863 69418.5432.5880.040119690.541 77850.012 44414.8871.7750.017
47090.518 77849.864 22214.7982.5000.007107590.873 50049.987 52817.2402.2630.019
48990.530 83349.868 66716.6495.0080.008107990.830 77849.988 19413.0162.2870.015
50390.469 33349.871 41715.5472.6080.016109590.619 69449.991 05616.1974.4030.010
52190.653 47249.876 08315.5785.3060.005110290.526 80649.991 80618.7451.8290.083
52990.475 61149.875 66716.7452.5730.015118990.456 47250.010 61116.3401.9310.015

APPENDIX B: COLOUR–COLOUR DIAGRAM

Left panel: The color index between V-band and R-band (V-R) versus B-V diagram for NGC 2126 member stars. Right panel: The B-V versus color index between V-band and I-band (V-I) diagram for NGC 2126 member stars. The solid lines in the plot are the theoretical isochrones and the arrow represents the reddening vector.
Figure B1.

Left panel: The color index between V-band and R-band (V-R) versus B-V diagram for NGC 2126 member stars. Right panel: The B-V versus color index between V-band and I-band (V-I) diagram for NGC 2126 member stars. The solid lines in the plot are the theoretical isochrones and the arrow represents the reddening vector.

APPENDIX C: TESS PHOTOMETRY

The Sector 19 LCs and the corresponding frequency spectra of known variables in NGC 2126.
Figure C1.

The Sector 19 LCs and the corresponding frequency spectra of known variables in NGC 2126.

The Sector 59 LCs and the corresponding frequency spectra of known variables in NGC 2126.
Figure C2.

The Sector 59 LCs and the corresponding frequency spectra of known variables in NGC 2126.

The Sector 73 LCs and the corresponding frequency spectra of known variables in NGC 2126.
Figure C3.

The Sector 73 LCs and the corresponding frequency spectra of known variables in NGC 2126.

Table C1.

List of detected pulsational frequencies for Sectors 19, 59, and 73 for the stars without contamination. Their respective frequencies, amplitudes, and SNR are listed. The significance criterion was based on the minimum SNR of 5.6 and above.

IDSectorFrequency IDFrequency (d−1) Amplitude (mmag)SNR
V119|$f_{\rm{V}1,19,1}$||$1.2475\pm 0.0008$| |$7.8 \pm 0.3$|11.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,19,2}$||$1.156 \pm 0.001$| |$4.5 \pm 0.3$|6.4
 59|$f_{\rm{V}1,59,1}$||$1.2355\pm 0.0003$| |$5.53\pm 0.08$|19.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,59,2}$||$1.1597\pm 0.0003$| |$5.37\pm 0.08$|17.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,59,3}$||$1.1804\pm 0.0004$| |$4.01\pm 0.08$|13.6
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,59,4}$||$1.2893\pm 0.0008$| |$2.00\pm 0.08$|7.0
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,59,5}$||$1.4460\pm 0.0009$| |$1.68\pm 0.08$|6.1
 73|$f_{\rm{V}1,73,1}$||$1.1485\pm 0.0004$| |$5.7 \pm 0.1$|9.8
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,73,2}$||$1.2362\pm 0.0005$| |$4.7 \pm 0.1$|8.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,73,3}$||$1.1136\pm 0.0008$| |$3.0 \pm 0.1$|5.1
V219|$f_{\rm{V}2,19,1}$||$1.0771\pm 0.0007$| |$8.3 \pm 0.3$|13.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,19,2}$||$1.013 \pm 0.001$| |$5.7 \pm 0.3$|9.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,19,3}$||$1.176 \pm 0.001$| |$5.1 \pm 0.3$|9.3
 59|$f_{\rm{V}2,59,1}$||$1.0645\pm 0.0002$| |$14.3 \pm 0.2$|25.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,59,2}$||$1.1768\pm 0.0007$| |$5.2 \pm 0.2$|8.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,59,3}$||$1.019 \pm 0.001$| |$3.6 \pm 0.2$|6.1
 73|$f_{\rm{V}2,73,1}$||$1.0652\pm 0.0003$| |$14.0 \pm 0.2$|18.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,73,2}$||$1.1724\pm 0.0008$| |$5.1 \pm 0.2$|7.3
V319|$f_{\rm{V}3,19,1}$||$12.816 \pm 0.003$| |$4.5 \pm 0.5$|8.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}3,19,2}$||$10.372 \pm 0.003$| |$3.7 \pm 0.5$|5.5
 59|$f_{\rm{V}3,59,1}$||$12.814 \pm 0.001$| |$4.0 \pm 0.2$|16.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}3,59,2}$||$10.374 \pm 0.001$| |$3.4 \pm 0.2$|8.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}3,59,3}$||$13.514 \pm 0.002$| |$1.8 \pm 0.2$|6.7
 73|$f_{\rm{V}3,73,1}$||$10.374 \pm 0.002$| |$3.6 \pm 0.3$|7.8
  |$f_{\rm{V}3,73,2}$||$12.815 \pm 0.002$| |$3.5 \pm 0.3$|7.9
V519|$f_{\rm{V}5,19,1}$||$12.091 \pm 0.001$|*|$2.2 \pm 0.1$|10.4
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,19,2}$||$10.440 \pm 0.002$| |$1.6 \pm 0.1$|7.5
 59|$f_{\rm{V}5,59,1}$||$11.4365\pm 0.0003$|*|$2.24\pm 0.03$|34.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,2}$||$12.0923\pm 0.0004$|*|$1.63\pm 0.03$|27.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,3}$||$10.4384\pm 0.0006$| |$1.06\pm 0.03$|23.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,4}$||$21.4049\pm 0.0007$| |$0.84\pm 0.03$|15.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,5}$||$11.8053\pm 0.0008$| |$0.76\pm 0.03$|12.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,6}$||$10.8224\pm 0.0009$| |$0.70\pm 0.03$|12.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,7}$||$18.2956\pm 0.0009$| |$0.67\pm 0.03$|12.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,8}$||$19.0526\pm 0.0009$| |$0.64\pm 0.03$|13.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,9}$||$11.3121\pm 0.0009$| |$0.64\pm 0.03$|9.7
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,10}$||$10.957 \pm 0.001$| |$0.42\pm 0.03$|7.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,11}$||$23.452 \pm 0.001$| |$0.41\pm 0.03$|9.6
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,12}$||$21.906 \pm 0.002$| |$0.38\pm 0.03$|6.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,13}$||$12.639 \pm 0.002$| |$0.34\pm 0.03$|6.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,14}$||$21.325 \pm 0.002$| |$0.33\pm 0.03$|6.0
 73|$f_{\rm{V}5,73,1}$||$12.0915\pm 0.0005$|*|$2.54\pm 0.06$|24.0
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,2}$||$11.4449\pm 0.0006$|*|$1.79\pm 0.06$|18.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,3}$||$10.4380\pm 0.0007$| |$1.66\pm 0.06$|19.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,4}$||$21.4070\pm 0.0008$| |$1.47\pm 0.06$|12.4
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,5}$||$11.8051\pm 0.0009$| |$1.29\pm 0.06$|12.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,6}$||$19.0531\pm 0.0009$| |$1.30\pm 0.06$|18.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,7}$||$18.298 \pm 0.001$| |$1.16\pm 0.06$|13.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,8}$||$11.314 \pm 0.001$| |$1.17\pm 0.06$|12.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,9}$||$10.824 \pm 0.001$| |$1.13\pm 0.06$|12.7
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,10}$||$10.953 \pm 0.001$| |$0.92\pm 0.06$|10.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,11}$||$23.453 \pm 0.001$| |$0.80\pm 0.06$|9.4
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,12}$||$11.372 \pm 0.002$| |$0.65\pm 0.06$|7.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,13}$||$23.250 \pm 0.002$| |$0.50\pm 0.06$|6.1
ZV119|$f_{\rm{ZV}1,19,1}$||$12.253 \pm 0.002$|*|$1.2 \pm 0.1$|9.2
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,19,2}$||$15.461 \pm 0.003$|*|$0.9 \pm 0.1$|6.8
 59|$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,1}$||$12.2504\pm 0.0006$|*|$4.3 \pm 0.1$|21.9
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,2}$||$15.458 \pm 0.001$|*|$2.0 \pm 0.1$|12.6
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,3}$||$16.120 \pm 0.002$| |$1.4 \pm 0.1$|9.4
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,4}$||$11.165 \pm 0.002$| |$1.4 \pm 0.1$|7.9
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,5}$||$15.943 \pm 0.002$| |$1.4 \pm 0.1$|9.5
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,6}$||$13.512 \pm 0.002$| |$1.3 \pm 0.1$|6.1
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,7}$||$11.660 \pm 0.003$| |$1.1 \pm 0.1$|5.8
 73|$f_{\rm{ZV}1,73,1}$||$12.2531\pm 0.0008$|*|$2.11\pm 0.08$|16.0
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,73,2}$||$15.461 \pm 0.002$|*|$0.97\pm 0.08$|6.8
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,73,3}$||$11.171 \pm 0.003$| |$0.65\pm 0.08$|5.2
N219|$f_{\rm{N}2,19,1}$||$14.552 \pm 0.002$| |$1.4 \pm 0.1$|7.3
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,19,2}$||$17.094 \pm 0.003$| |$1.3 \pm 0.1$|7.8
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,19,3}$||$4.608 \pm 0.003$| |$1.1 \pm 0.1$|6.1
 59|$f_{\rm{N}2,59,1}$||$14.5554\pm 0.0007$|*|$2.09\pm 0.07$|22.7
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,2}$||$17.0921\pm 0.0008$| |$1.89\pm 0.07$|21.1
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,3}$||$16.304 \pm 0.001$| |$1.10\pm 0.07$|13.6
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,4}$||$18.627 \pm 0.002$| |$0.89\pm 0.07$|10.0
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,5}$||$15.134 \pm 0.002$| |$0.82\pm 0.07$|9.5
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,6}$||$5.206 \pm 0.002$| |$0.79\pm 0.07$|5.7
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,7}$||$11.785 \pm 0.003^{*}$| |$0.61\pm 0.07$|6.1
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,8}$||$15.098 \pm 0.003$| |$0.57\pm 0.07$|6.6
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,9}$||$15.774 \pm 0.003$| |$0.49\pm 0.07$|5.9
 73|$f_{\rm{N}2,73,1}$||$14.554 \pm 0.001$|*|$1.89\pm 0.09$|14.5
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,73,2}$||$17.088 \pm 0.001$|*|$1.55\pm 0.09$|17.0
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,73,3}$||$16.301 \pm 0.002$| |$1.08\pm 0.09$|9.9
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,73,4}$||$15.138 \pm 0.002$| |$0.91\pm 0.09$|6.8
83919|$f_{839,19,1}$||$1.3530 \pm 0.0006$| |$21.6 \pm 0.6$|15.0
  |$f_{839,19,2}$||$2.715 \pm 0.003$| |$4.5 \pm 0.6$|5.2
IDSectorFrequency IDFrequency (d−1) Amplitude (mmag)SNR
V119|$f_{\rm{V}1,19,1}$||$1.2475\pm 0.0008$| |$7.8 \pm 0.3$|11.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,19,2}$||$1.156 \pm 0.001$| |$4.5 \pm 0.3$|6.4
 59|$f_{\rm{V}1,59,1}$||$1.2355\pm 0.0003$| |$5.53\pm 0.08$|19.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,59,2}$||$1.1597\pm 0.0003$| |$5.37\pm 0.08$|17.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,59,3}$||$1.1804\pm 0.0004$| |$4.01\pm 0.08$|13.6
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,59,4}$||$1.2893\pm 0.0008$| |$2.00\pm 0.08$|7.0
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,59,5}$||$1.4460\pm 0.0009$| |$1.68\pm 0.08$|6.1
 73|$f_{\rm{V}1,73,1}$||$1.1485\pm 0.0004$| |$5.7 \pm 0.1$|9.8
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,73,2}$||$1.2362\pm 0.0005$| |$4.7 \pm 0.1$|8.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,73,3}$||$1.1136\pm 0.0008$| |$3.0 \pm 0.1$|5.1
V219|$f_{\rm{V}2,19,1}$||$1.0771\pm 0.0007$| |$8.3 \pm 0.3$|13.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,19,2}$||$1.013 \pm 0.001$| |$5.7 \pm 0.3$|9.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,19,3}$||$1.176 \pm 0.001$| |$5.1 \pm 0.3$|9.3
 59|$f_{\rm{V}2,59,1}$||$1.0645\pm 0.0002$| |$14.3 \pm 0.2$|25.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,59,2}$||$1.1768\pm 0.0007$| |$5.2 \pm 0.2$|8.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,59,3}$||$1.019 \pm 0.001$| |$3.6 \pm 0.2$|6.1
 73|$f_{\rm{V}2,73,1}$||$1.0652\pm 0.0003$| |$14.0 \pm 0.2$|18.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,73,2}$||$1.1724\pm 0.0008$| |$5.1 \pm 0.2$|7.3
V319|$f_{\rm{V}3,19,1}$||$12.816 \pm 0.003$| |$4.5 \pm 0.5$|8.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}3,19,2}$||$10.372 \pm 0.003$| |$3.7 \pm 0.5$|5.5
 59|$f_{\rm{V}3,59,1}$||$12.814 \pm 0.001$| |$4.0 \pm 0.2$|16.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}3,59,2}$||$10.374 \pm 0.001$| |$3.4 \pm 0.2$|8.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}3,59,3}$||$13.514 \pm 0.002$| |$1.8 \pm 0.2$|6.7
 73|$f_{\rm{V}3,73,1}$||$10.374 \pm 0.002$| |$3.6 \pm 0.3$|7.8
  |$f_{\rm{V}3,73,2}$||$12.815 \pm 0.002$| |$3.5 \pm 0.3$|7.9
V519|$f_{\rm{V}5,19,1}$||$12.091 \pm 0.001$|*|$2.2 \pm 0.1$|10.4
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,19,2}$||$10.440 \pm 0.002$| |$1.6 \pm 0.1$|7.5
 59|$f_{\rm{V}5,59,1}$||$11.4365\pm 0.0003$|*|$2.24\pm 0.03$|34.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,2}$||$12.0923\pm 0.0004$|*|$1.63\pm 0.03$|27.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,3}$||$10.4384\pm 0.0006$| |$1.06\pm 0.03$|23.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,4}$||$21.4049\pm 0.0007$| |$0.84\pm 0.03$|15.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,5}$||$11.8053\pm 0.0008$| |$0.76\pm 0.03$|12.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,6}$||$10.8224\pm 0.0009$| |$0.70\pm 0.03$|12.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,7}$||$18.2956\pm 0.0009$| |$0.67\pm 0.03$|12.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,8}$||$19.0526\pm 0.0009$| |$0.64\pm 0.03$|13.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,9}$||$11.3121\pm 0.0009$| |$0.64\pm 0.03$|9.7
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,10}$||$10.957 \pm 0.001$| |$0.42\pm 0.03$|7.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,11}$||$23.452 \pm 0.001$| |$0.41\pm 0.03$|9.6
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,12}$||$21.906 \pm 0.002$| |$0.38\pm 0.03$|6.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,13}$||$12.639 \pm 0.002$| |$0.34\pm 0.03$|6.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,14}$||$21.325 \pm 0.002$| |$0.33\pm 0.03$|6.0
 73|$f_{\rm{V}5,73,1}$||$12.0915\pm 0.0005$|*|$2.54\pm 0.06$|24.0
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,2}$||$11.4449\pm 0.0006$|*|$1.79\pm 0.06$|18.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,3}$||$10.4380\pm 0.0007$| |$1.66\pm 0.06$|19.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,4}$||$21.4070\pm 0.0008$| |$1.47\pm 0.06$|12.4
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,5}$||$11.8051\pm 0.0009$| |$1.29\pm 0.06$|12.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,6}$||$19.0531\pm 0.0009$| |$1.30\pm 0.06$|18.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,7}$||$18.298 \pm 0.001$| |$1.16\pm 0.06$|13.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,8}$||$11.314 \pm 0.001$| |$1.17\pm 0.06$|12.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,9}$||$10.824 \pm 0.001$| |$1.13\pm 0.06$|12.7
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,10}$||$10.953 \pm 0.001$| |$0.92\pm 0.06$|10.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,11}$||$23.453 \pm 0.001$| |$0.80\pm 0.06$|9.4
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,12}$||$11.372 \pm 0.002$| |$0.65\pm 0.06$|7.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,13}$||$23.250 \pm 0.002$| |$0.50\pm 0.06$|6.1
ZV119|$f_{\rm{ZV}1,19,1}$||$12.253 \pm 0.002$|*|$1.2 \pm 0.1$|9.2
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,19,2}$||$15.461 \pm 0.003$|*|$0.9 \pm 0.1$|6.8
 59|$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,1}$||$12.2504\pm 0.0006$|*|$4.3 \pm 0.1$|21.9
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,2}$||$15.458 \pm 0.001$|*|$2.0 \pm 0.1$|12.6
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,3}$||$16.120 \pm 0.002$| |$1.4 \pm 0.1$|9.4
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,4}$||$11.165 \pm 0.002$| |$1.4 \pm 0.1$|7.9
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,5}$||$15.943 \pm 0.002$| |$1.4 \pm 0.1$|9.5
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,6}$||$13.512 \pm 0.002$| |$1.3 \pm 0.1$|6.1
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,7}$||$11.660 \pm 0.003$| |$1.1 \pm 0.1$|5.8
 73|$f_{\rm{ZV}1,73,1}$||$12.2531\pm 0.0008$|*|$2.11\pm 0.08$|16.0
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,73,2}$||$15.461 \pm 0.002$|*|$0.97\pm 0.08$|6.8
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,73,3}$||$11.171 \pm 0.003$| |$0.65\pm 0.08$|5.2
N219|$f_{\rm{N}2,19,1}$||$14.552 \pm 0.002$| |$1.4 \pm 0.1$|7.3
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,19,2}$||$17.094 \pm 0.003$| |$1.3 \pm 0.1$|7.8
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,19,3}$||$4.608 \pm 0.003$| |$1.1 \pm 0.1$|6.1
 59|$f_{\rm{N}2,59,1}$||$14.5554\pm 0.0007$|*|$2.09\pm 0.07$|22.7
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,2}$||$17.0921\pm 0.0008$| |$1.89\pm 0.07$|21.1
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,3}$||$16.304 \pm 0.001$| |$1.10\pm 0.07$|13.6
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,4}$||$18.627 \pm 0.002$| |$0.89\pm 0.07$|10.0
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,5}$||$15.134 \pm 0.002$| |$0.82\pm 0.07$|9.5
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,6}$||$5.206 \pm 0.002$| |$0.79\pm 0.07$|5.7
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,7}$||$11.785 \pm 0.003^{*}$| |$0.61\pm 0.07$|6.1
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,8}$||$15.098 \pm 0.003$| |$0.57\pm 0.07$|6.6
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,9}$||$15.774 \pm 0.003$| |$0.49\pm 0.07$|5.9
 73|$f_{\rm{N}2,73,1}$||$14.554 \pm 0.001$|*|$1.89\pm 0.09$|14.5
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,73,2}$||$17.088 \pm 0.001$|*|$1.55\pm 0.09$|17.0
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,73,3}$||$16.301 \pm 0.002$| |$1.08\pm 0.09$|9.9
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,73,4}$||$15.138 \pm 0.002$| |$0.91\pm 0.09$|6.8
83919|$f_{839,19,1}$||$1.3530 \pm 0.0006$| |$21.6 \pm 0.6$|15.0
  |$f_{839,19,2}$||$2.715 \pm 0.003$| |$4.5 \pm 0.6$|5.2

Note.*Frequency values consistent with Chehlaeh et al. (2018).

Table C1.

List of detected pulsational frequencies for Sectors 19, 59, and 73 for the stars without contamination. Their respective frequencies, amplitudes, and SNR are listed. The significance criterion was based on the minimum SNR of 5.6 and above.

IDSectorFrequency IDFrequency (d−1) Amplitude (mmag)SNR
V119|$f_{\rm{V}1,19,1}$||$1.2475\pm 0.0008$| |$7.8 \pm 0.3$|11.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,19,2}$||$1.156 \pm 0.001$| |$4.5 \pm 0.3$|6.4
 59|$f_{\rm{V}1,59,1}$||$1.2355\pm 0.0003$| |$5.53\pm 0.08$|19.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,59,2}$||$1.1597\pm 0.0003$| |$5.37\pm 0.08$|17.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,59,3}$||$1.1804\pm 0.0004$| |$4.01\pm 0.08$|13.6
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,59,4}$||$1.2893\pm 0.0008$| |$2.00\pm 0.08$|7.0
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,59,5}$||$1.4460\pm 0.0009$| |$1.68\pm 0.08$|6.1
 73|$f_{\rm{V}1,73,1}$||$1.1485\pm 0.0004$| |$5.7 \pm 0.1$|9.8
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,73,2}$||$1.2362\pm 0.0005$| |$4.7 \pm 0.1$|8.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,73,3}$||$1.1136\pm 0.0008$| |$3.0 \pm 0.1$|5.1
V219|$f_{\rm{V}2,19,1}$||$1.0771\pm 0.0007$| |$8.3 \pm 0.3$|13.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,19,2}$||$1.013 \pm 0.001$| |$5.7 \pm 0.3$|9.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,19,3}$||$1.176 \pm 0.001$| |$5.1 \pm 0.3$|9.3
 59|$f_{\rm{V}2,59,1}$||$1.0645\pm 0.0002$| |$14.3 \pm 0.2$|25.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,59,2}$||$1.1768\pm 0.0007$| |$5.2 \pm 0.2$|8.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,59,3}$||$1.019 \pm 0.001$| |$3.6 \pm 0.2$|6.1
 73|$f_{\rm{V}2,73,1}$||$1.0652\pm 0.0003$| |$14.0 \pm 0.2$|18.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,73,2}$||$1.1724\pm 0.0008$| |$5.1 \pm 0.2$|7.3
V319|$f_{\rm{V}3,19,1}$||$12.816 \pm 0.003$| |$4.5 \pm 0.5$|8.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}3,19,2}$||$10.372 \pm 0.003$| |$3.7 \pm 0.5$|5.5
 59|$f_{\rm{V}3,59,1}$||$12.814 \pm 0.001$| |$4.0 \pm 0.2$|16.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}3,59,2}$||$10.374 \pm 0.001$| |$3.4 \pm 0.2$|8.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}3,59,3}$||$13.514 \pm 0.002$| |$1.8 \pm 0.2$|6.7
 73|$f_{\rm{V}3,73,1}$||$10.374 \pm 0.002$| |$3.6 \pm 0.3$|7.8
  |$f_{\rm{V}3,73,2}$||$12.815 \pm 0.002$| |$3.5 \pm 0.3$|7.9
V519|$f_{\rm{V}5,19,1}$||$12.091 \pm 0.001$|*|$2.2 \pm 0.1$|10.4
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,19,2}$||$10.440 \pm 0.002$| |$1.6 \pm 0.1$|7.5
 59|$f_{\rm{V}5,59,1}$||$11.4365\pm 0.0003$|*|$2.24\pm 0.03$|34.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,2}$||$12.0923\pm 0.0004$|*|$1.63\pm 0.03$|27.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,3}$||$10.4384\pm 0.0006$| |$1.06\pm 0.03$|23.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,4}$||$21.4049\pm 0.0007$| |$0.84\pm 0.03$|15.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,5}$||$11.8053\pm 0.0008$| |$0.76\pm 0.03$|12.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,6}$||$10.8224\pm 0.0009$| |$0.70\pm 0.03$|12.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,7}$||$18.2956\pm 0.0009$| |$0.67\pm 0.03$|12.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,8}$||$19.0526\pm 0.0009$| |$0.64\pm 0.03$|13.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,9}$||$11.3121\pm 0.0009$| |$0.64\pm 0.03$|9.7
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,10}$||$10.957 \pm 0.001$| |$0.42\pm 0.03$|7.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,11}$||$23.452 \pm 0.001$| |$0.41\pm 0.03$|9.6
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,12}$||$21.906 \pm 0.002$| |$0.38\pm 0.03$|6.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,13}$||$12.639 \pm 0.002$| |$0.34\pm 0.03$|6.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,14}$||$21.325 \pm 0.002$| |$0.33\pm 0.03$|6.0
 73|$f_{\rm{V}5,73,1}$||$12.0915\pm 0.0005$|*|$2.54\pm 0.06$|24.0
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,2}$||$11.4449\pm 0.0006$|*|$1.79\pm 0.06$|18.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,3}$||$10.4380\pm 0.0007$| |$1.66\pm 0.06$|19.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,4}$||$21.4070\pm 0.0008$| |$1.47\pm 0.06$|12.4
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,5}$||$11.8051\pm 0.0009$| |$1.29\pm 0.06$|12.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,6}$||$19.0531\pm 0.0009$| |$1.30\pm 0.06$|18.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,7}$||$18.298 \pm 0.001$| |$1.16\pm 0.06$|13.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,8}$||$11.314 \pm 0.001$| |$1.17\pm 0.06$|12.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,9}$||$10.824 \pm 0.001$| |$1.13\pm 0.06$|12.7
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,10}$||$10.953 \pm 0.001$| |$0.92\pm 0.06$|10.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,11}$||$23.453 \pm 0.001$| |$0.80\pm 0.06$|9.4
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,12}$||$11.372 \pm 0.002$| |$0.65\pm 0.06$|7.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,13}$||$23.250 \pm 0.002$| |$0.50\pm 0.06$|6.1
ZV119|$f_{\rm{ZV}1,19,1}$||$12.253 \pm 0.002$|*|$1.2 \pm 0.1$|9.2
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,19,2}$||$15.461 \pm 0.003$|*|$0.9 \pm 0.1$|6.8
 59|$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,1}$||$12.2504\pm 0.0006$|*|$4.3 \pm 0.1$|21.9
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,2}$||$15.458 \pm 0.001$|*|$2.0 \pm 0.1$|12.6
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,3}$||$16.120 \pm 0.002$| |$1.4 \pm 0.1$|9.4
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,4}$||$11.165 \pm 0.002$| |$1.4 \pm 0.1$|7.9
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,5}$||$15.943 \pm 0.002$| |$1.4 \pm 0.1$|9.5
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,6}$||$13.512 \pm 0.002$| |$1.3 \pm 0.1$|6.1
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,7}$||$11.660 \pm 0.003$| |$1.1 \pm 0.1$|5.8
 73|$f_{\rm{ZV}1,73,1}$||$12.2531\pm 0.0008$|*|$2.11\pm 0.08$|16.0
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,73,2}$||$15.461 \pm 0.002$|*|$0.97\pm 0.08$|6.8
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,73,3}$||$11.171 \pm 0.003$| |$0.65\pm 0.08$|5.2
N219|$f_{\rm{N}2,19,1}$||$14.552 \pm 0.002$| |$1.4 \pm 0.1$|7.3
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,19,2}$||$17.094 \pm 0.003$| |$1.3 \pm 0.1$|7.8
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,19,3}$||$4.608 \pm 0.003$| |$1.1 \pm 0.1$|6.1
 59|$f_{\rm{N}2,59,1}$||$14.5554\pm 0.0007$|*|$2.09\pm 0.07$|22.7
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,2}$||$17.0921\pm 0.0008$| |$1.89\pm 0.07$|21.1
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,3}$||$16.304 \pm 0.001$| |$1.10\pm 0.07$|13.6
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,4}$||$18.627 \pm 0.002$| |$0.89\pm 0.07$|10.0
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,5}$||$15.134 \pm 0.002$| |$0.82\pm 0.07$|9.5
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,6}$||$5.206 \pm 0.002$| |$0.79\pm 0.07$|5.7
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,7}$||$11.785 \pm 0.003^{*}$| |$0.61\pm 0.07$|6.1
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,8}$||$15.098 \pm 0.003$| |$0.57\pm 0.07$|6.6
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,9}$||$15.774 \pm 0.003$| |$0.49\pm 0.07$|5.9
 73|$f_{\rm{N}2,73,1}$||$14.554 \pm 0.001$|*|$1.89\pm 0.09$|14.5
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,73,2}$||$17.088 \pm 0.001$|*|$1.55\pm 0.09$|17.0
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,73,3}$||$16.301 \pm 0.002$| |$1.08\pm 0.09$|9.9
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,73,4}$||$15.138 \pm 0.002$| |$0.91\pm 0.09$|6.8
83919|$f_{839,19,1}$||$1.3530 \pm 0.0006$| |$21.6 \pm 0.6$|15.0
  |$f_{839,19,2}$||$2.715 \pm 0.003$| |$4.5 \pm 0.6$|5.2
IDSectorFrequency IDFrequency (d−1) Amplitude (mmag)SNR
V119|$f_{\rm{V}1,19,1}$||$1.2475\pm 0.0008$| |$7.8 \pm 0.3$|11.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,19,2}$||$1.156 \pm 0.001$| |$4.5 \pm 0.3$|6.4
 59|$f_{\rm{V}1,59,1}$||$1.2355\pm 0.0003$| |$5.53\pm 0.08$|19.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,59,2}$||$1.1597\pm 0.0003$| |$5.37\pm 0.08$|17.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,59,3}$||$1.1804\pm 0.0004$| |$4.01\pm 0.08$|13.6
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,59,4}$||$1.2893\pm 0.0008$| |$2.00\pm 0.08$|7.0
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,59,5}$||$1.4460\pm 0.0009$| |$1.68\pm 0.08$|6.1
 73|$f_{\rm{V}1,73,1}$||$1.1485\pm 0.0004$| |$5.7 \pm 0.1$|9.8
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,73,2}$||$1.2362\pm 0.0005$| |$4.7 \pm 0.1$|8.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}1,73,3}$||$1.1136\pm 0.0008$| |$3.0 \pm 0.1$|5.1
V219|$f_{\rm{V}2,19,1}$||$1.0771\pm 0.0007$| |$8.3 \pm 0.3$|13.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,19,2}$||$1.013 \pm 0.001$| |$5.7 \pm 0.3$|9.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,19,3}$||$1.176 \pm 0.001$| |$5.1 \pm 0.3$|9.3
 59|$f_{\rm{V}2,59,1}$||$1.0645\pm 0.0002$| |$14.3 \pm 0.2$|25.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,59,2}$||$1.1768\pm 0.0007$| |$5.2 \pm 0.2$|8.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,59,3}$||$1.019 \pm 0.001$| |$3.6 \pm 0.2$|6.1
 73|$f_{\rm{V}2,73,1}$||$1.0652\pm 0.0003$| |$14.0 \pm 0.2$|18.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}2,73,2}$||$1.1724\pm 0.0008$| |$5.1 \pm 0.2$|7.3
V319|$f_{\rm{V}3,19,1}$||$12.816 \pm 0.003$| |$4.5 \pm 0.5$|8.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}3,19,2}$||$10.372 \pm 0.003$| |$3.7 \pm 0.5$|5.5
 59|$f_{\rm{V}3,59,1}$||$12.814 \pm 0.001$| |$4.0 \pm 0.2$|16.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}3,59,2}$||$10.374 \pm 0.001$| |$3.4 \pm 0.2$|8.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}3,59,3}$||$13.514 \pm 0.002$| |$1.8 \pm 0.2$|6.7
 73|$f_{\rm{V}3,73,1}$||$10.374 \pm 0.002$| |$3.6 \pm 0.3$|7.8
  |$f_{\rm{V}3,73,2}$||$12.815 \pm 0.002$| |$3.5 \pm 0.3$|7.9
V519|$f_{\rm{V}5,19,1}$||$12.091 \pm 0.001$|*|$2.2 \pm 0.1$|10.4
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,19,2}$||$10.440 \pm 0.002$| |$1.6 \pm 0.1$|7.5
 59|$f_{\rm{V}5,59,1}$||$11.4365\pm 0.0003$|*|$2.24\pm 0.03$|34.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,2}$||$12.0923\pm 0.0004$|*|$1.63\pm 0.03$|27.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,3}$||$10.4384\pm 0.0006$| |$1.06\pm 0.03$|23.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,4}$||$21.4049\pm 0.0007$| |$0.84\pm 0.03$|15.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,5}$||$11.8053\pm 0.0008$| |$0.76\pm 0.03$|12.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,6}$||$10.8224\pm 0.0009$| |$0.70\pm 0.03$|12.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,7}$||$18.2956\pm 0.0009$| |$0.67\pm 0.03$|12.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,8}$||$19.0526\pm 0.0009$| |$0.64\pm 0.03$|13.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,9}$||$11.3121\pm 0.0009$| |$0.64\pm 0.03$|9.7
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,10}$||$10.957 \pm 0.001$| |$0.42\pm 0.03$|7.2
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,11}$||$23.452 \pm 0.001$| |$0.41\pm 0.03$|9.6
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,12}$||$21.906 \pm 0.002$| |$0.38\pm 0.03$|6.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,13}$||$12.639 \pm 0.002$| |$0.34\pm 0.03$|6.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,59,14}$||$21.325 \pm 0.002$| |$0.33\pm 0.03$|6.0
 73|$f_{\rm{V}5,73,1}$||$12.0915\pm 0.0005$|*|$2.54\pm 0.06$|24.0
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,2}$||$11.4449\pm 0.0006$|*|$1.79\pm 0.06$|18.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,3}$||$10.4380\pm 0.0007$| |$1.66\pm 0.06$|19.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,4}$||$21.4070\pm 0.0008$| |$1.47\pm 0.06$|12.4
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,5}$||$11.8051\pm 0.0009$| |$1.29\pm 0.06$|12.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,6}$||$19.0531\pm 0.0009$| |$1.30\pm 0.06$|18.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,7}$||$18.298 \pm 0.001$| |$1.16\pm 0.06$|13.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,8}$||$11.314 \pm 0.001$| |$1.17\pm 0.06$|12.9
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,9}$||$10.824 \pm 0.001$| |$1.13\pm 0.06$|12.7
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,10}$||$10.953 \pm 0.001$| |$0.92\pm 0.06$|10.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,11}$||$23.453 \pm 0.001$| |$0.80\pm 0.06$|9.4
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,12}$||$11.372 \pm 0.002$| |$0.65\pm 0.06$|7.1
  |$f_{\rm{V}5,73,13}$||$23.250 \pm 0.002$| |$0.50\pm 0.06$|6.1
ZV119|$f_{\rm{ZV}1,19,1}$||$12.253 \pm 0.002$|*|$1.2 \pm 0.1$|9.2
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,19,2}$||$15.461 \pm 0.003$|*|$0.9 \pm 0.1$|6.8
 59|$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,1}$||$12.2504\pm 0.0006$|*|$4.3 \pm 0.1$|21.9
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,2}$||$15.458 \pm 0.001$|*|$2.0 \pm 0.1$|12.6
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,3}$||$16.120 \pm 0.002$| |$1.4 \pm 0.1$|9.4
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,4}$||$11.165 \pm 0.002$| |$1.4 \pm 0.1$|7.9
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,5}$||$15.943 \pm 0.002$| |$1.4 \pm 0.1$|9.5
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,6}$||$13.512 \pm 0.002$| |$1.3 \pm 0.1$|6.1
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,59,7}$||$11.660 \pm 0.003$| |$1.1 \pm 0.1$|5.8
 73|$f_{\rm{ZV}1,73,1}$||$12.2531\pm 0.0008$|*|$2.11\pm 0.08$|16.0
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,73,2}$||$15.461 \pm 0.002$|*|$0.97\pm 0.08$|6.8
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}1,73,3}$||$11.171 \pm 0.003$| |$0.65\pm 0.08$|5.2
N219|$f_{\rm{N}2,19,1}$||$14.552 \pm 0.002$| |$1.4 \pm 0.1$|7.3
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,19,2}$||$17.094 \pm 0.003$| |$1.3 \pm 0.1$|7.8
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,19,3}$||$4.608 \pm 0.003$| |$1.1 \pm 0.1$|6.1
 59|$f_{\rm{N}2,59,1}$||$14.5554\pm 0.0007$|*|$2.09\pm 0.07$|22.7
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,2}$||$17.0921\pm 0.0008$| |$1.89\pm 0.07$|21.1
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,3}$||$16.304 \pm 0.001$| |$1.10\pm 0.07$|13.6
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,4}$||$18.627 \pm 0.002$| |$0.89\pm 0.07$|10.0
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,5}$||$15.134 \pm 0.002$| |$0.82\pm 0.07$|9.5
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,6}$||$5.206 \pm 0.002$| |$0.79\pm 0.07$|5.7
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,7}$||$11.785 \pm 0.003^{*}$| |$0.61\pm 0.07$|6.1
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,8}$||$15.098 \pm 0.003$| |$0.57\pm 0.07$|6.6
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,59,9}$||$15.774 \pm 0.003$| |$0.49\pm 0.07$|5.9
 73|$f_{\rm{N}2,73,1}$||$14.554 \pm 0.001$|*|$1.89\pm 0.09$|14.5
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,73,2}$||$17.088 \pm 0.001$|*|$1.55\pm 0.09$|17.0
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,73,3}$||$16.301 \pm 0.002$| |$1.08\pm 0.09$|9.9
  |$f_{\rm{N}2,73,4}$||$15.138 \pm 0.002$| |$0.91\pm 0.09$|6.8
83919|$f_{839,19,1}$||$1.3530 \pm 0.0006$| |$21.6 \pm 0.6$|15.0
  |$f_{839,19,2}$||$2.715 \pm 0.003$| |$4.5 \pm 0.6$|5.2

Note.*Frequency values consistent with Chehlaeh et al. (2018).

Table C2.

List of detected pulsational frequencies for Sectors 19, 59, and 73 for the stars that are contaminated. Their respective frequencies, amplitudes, and SNR are listed. The significance criterion was based on the minimum SNR of 5.6 and above.

IDSectorFrequency IDFrequency (d−1) Amplitude (mmag)SNR
V619|$f_{\rm{V}6,19,1}$||$7.7248\pm 0.0005$|*|$3.08\pm 0.07$|46.8
 59|$f_{\rm{V}6,59,1}$||$7.7266\pm 0.0004$|*|$4.10\pm 0.07$|41.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}6,59,1}/2$||$3.862 \pm 0.002$| |$0.75\pm 0.07$|8.2
  |$2f_{\rm{V}6,59,1}$||$15.450 \pm 0.002$|*|$0.63\pm 0.07$|7.9
 73|$f_{\rm{V}6,73,1}$||$7.7270\pm 0.0002$|*|$4.77\pm 0.06$|49.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}6,73,1}/2$||$3.864 \pm 0.002$| |$0.74\pm 0.06$|7.8
  |$2f_{\rm{V}6,73,1}$||$15.454 \pm 0.002$|*|$0.56\pm 0.06$|8.8
ZV219|$f_{\rm{ZV}2,19,1}$||$14.851 \pm 0.002$|*|$1.6 \pm 0.2$|7.7
 59|$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,1}$||$14.852 \pm 0.001$|*|$2.4 \pm 0.2$|14.2
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,2}$||$14.802 \pm 0.003$| |$1.3 \pm 0.2$|7.9
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,3}$||$14.409 \pm 0.003$| |$1.0 \pm 0.2$|6.8
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,4}$||$0.318 \pm 0.002$| |$1.2 \pm 0.1$|5.8
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,5}$||$1.815 \pm 0.002$|**|$1.1 \pm 0.1$|5.7
 73|$f_{\rm{ZV}2,73,1}$||$14.8394\pm 0.0008$|*|$2.53\pm 0.09$|26.1
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,73,2}$||$14.405 \pm 0.002$| |$1.01\pm 0.09$|10.3
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,73,3}$||$14.793 \pm 0.002$| |$1.07\pm 0.09$|11.0
N119|$f_{\rm{N}1,19,1}$||$13.5991\pm 0.0008$|*|$1.81\pm 0.07$|19.4
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,19,2}$||$17.176 \pm 0.003$|*|$0.76\pm 0.07$|10.4
 59|$f_{\rm{N}1,59,1}$||$13.5969\pm 0.0009$|*|$1.70\pm 0.07$|19.7
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,59,2}$||$17.177 \pm 0.002$|*|$0.74\pm 0.07$|8.4
 73|$f_{\rm{N}1,73,1}$||$13.5972\pm 0.0003$|*|$3.38\pm 0.05$|28.4
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,73,2}$||$17.1767\pm 0.0006$|*|$1.67\pm 0.05$|24.6
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,73,3}$||$21.203 \pm 0.001$|*|$0.71\pm 0.05$|9.1
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,73,4}$||$21.348 \pm 0.002$| |$0.59\pm 0.05$|7.8
IDSectorFrequency IDFrequency (d−1) Amplitude (mmag)SNR
V619|$f_{\rm{V}6,19,1}$||$7.7248\pm 0.0005$|*|$3.08\pm 0.07$|46.8
 59|$f_{\rm{V}6,59,1}$||$7.7266\pm 0.0004$|*|$4.10\pm 0.07$|41.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}6,59,1}/2$||$3.862 \pm 0.002$| |$0.75\pm 0.07$|8.2
  |$2f_{\rm{V}6,59,1}$||$15.450 \pm 0.002$|*|$0.63\pm 0.07$|7.9
 73|$f_{\rm{V}6,73,1}$||$7.7270\pm 0.0002$|*|$4.77\pm 0.06$|49.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}6,73,1}/2$||$3.864 \pm 0.002$| |$0.74\pm 0.06$|7.8
  |$2f_{\rm{V}6,73,1}$||$15.454 \pm 0.002$|*|$0.56\pm 0.06$|8.8
ZV219|$f_{\rm{ZV}2,19,1}$||$14.851 \pm 0.002$|*|$1.6 \pm 0.2$|7.7
 59|$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,1}$||$14.852 \pm 0.001$|*|$2.4 \pm 0.2$|14.2
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,2}$||$14.802 \pm 0.003$| |$1.3 \pm 0.2$|7.9
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,3}$||$14.409 \pm 0.003$| |$1.0 \pm 0.2$|6.8
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,4}$||$0.318 \pm 0.002$| |$1.2 \pm 0.1$|5.8
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,5}$||$1.815 \pm 0.002$|**|$1.1 \pm 0.1$|5.7
 73|$f_{\rm{ZV}2,73,1}$||$14.8394\pm 0.0008$|*|$2.53\pm 0.09$|26.1
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,73,2}$||$14.405 \pm 0.002$| |$1.01\pm 0.09$|10.3
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,73,3}$||$14.793 \pm 0.002$| |$1.07\pm 0.09$|11.0
N119|$f_{\rm{N}1,19,1}$||$13.5991\pm 0.0008$|*|$1.81\pm 0.07$|19.4
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,19,2}$||$17.176 \pm 0.003$|*|$0.76\pm 0.07$|10.4
 59|$f_{\rm{N}1,59,1}$||$13.5969\pm 0.0009$|*|$1.70\pm 0.07$|19.7
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,59,2}$||$17.177 \pm 0.002$|*|$0.74\pm 0.07$|8.4
 73|$f_{\rm{N}1,73,1}$||$13.5972\pm 0.0003$|*|$3.38\pm 0.05$|28.4
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,73,2}$||$17.1767\pm 0.0006$|*|$1.67\pm 0.05$|24.6
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,73,3}$||$21.203 \pm 0.001$|*|$0.71\pm 0.05$|9.1
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,73,4}$||$21.348 \pm 0.002$| |$0.59\pm 0.05$|7.8

Notes. *Frequency values consistent with Chehlaeh et al. (2018).

**Frequency values consistent with Zhang et al. (2012).

Table C2.

List of detected pulsational frequencies for Sectors 19, 59, and 73 for the stars that are contaminated. Their respective frequencies, amplitudes, and SNR are listed. The significance criterion was based on the minimum SNR of 5.6 and above.

IDSectorFrequency IDFrequency (d−1) Amplitude (mmag)SNR
V619|$f_{\rm{V}6,19,1}$||$7.7248\pm 0.0005$|*|$3.08\pm 0.07$|46.8
 59|$f_{\rm{V}6,59,1}$||$7.7266\pm 0.0004$|*|$4.10\pm 0.07$|41.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}6,59,1}/2$||$3.862 \pm 0.002$| |$0.75\pm 0.07$|8.2
  |$2f_{\rm{V}6,59,1}$||$15.450 \pm 0.002$|*|$0.63\pm 0.07$|7.9
 73|$f_{\rm{V}6,73,1}$||$7.7270\pm 0.0002$|*|$4.77\pm 0.06$|49.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}6,73,1}/2$||$3.864 \pm 0.002$| |$0.74\pm 0.06$|7.8
  |$2f_{\rm{V}6,73,1}$||$15.454 \pm 0.002$|*|$0.56\pm 0.06$|8.8
ZV219|$f_{\rm{ZV}2,19,1}$||$14.851 \pm 0.002$|*|$1.6 \pm 0.2$|7.7
 59|$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,1}$||$14.852 \pm 0.001$|*|$2.4 \pm 0.2$|14.2
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,2}$||$14.802 \pm 0.003$| |$1.3 \pm 0.2$|7.9
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,3}$||$14.409 \pm 0.003$| |$1.0 \pm 0.2$|6.8
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,4}$||$0.318 \pm 0.002$| |$1.2 \pm 0.1$|5.8
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,5}$||$1.815 \pm 0.002$|**|$1.1 \pm 0.1$|5.7
 73|$f_{\rm{ZV}2,73,1}$||$14.8394\pm 0.0008$|*|$2.53\pm 0.09$|26.1
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,73,2}$||$14.405 \pm 0.002$| |$1.01\pm 0.09$|10.3
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,73,3}$||$14.793 \pm 0.002$| |$1.07\pm 0.09$|11.0
N119|$f_{\rm{N}1,19,1}$||$13.5991\pm 0.0008$|*|$1.81\pm 0.07$|19.4
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,19,2}$||$17.176 \pm 0.003$|*|$0.76\pm 0.07$|10.4
 59|$f_{\rm{N}1,59,1}$||$13.5969\pm 0.0009$|*|$1.70\pm 0.07$|19.7
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,59,2}$||$17.177 \pm 0.002$|*|$0.74\pm 0.07$|8.4
 73|$f_{\rm{N}1,73,1}$||$13.5972\pm 0.0003$|*|$3.38\pm 0.05$|28.4
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,73,2}$||$17.1767\pm 0.0006$|*|$1.67\pm 0.05$|24.6
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,73,3}$||$21.203 \pm 0.001$|*|$0.71\pm 0.05$|9.1
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,73,4}$||$21.348 \pm 0.002$| |$0.59\pm 0.05$|7.8
IDSectorFrequency IDFrequency (d−1) Amplitude (mmag)SNR
V619|$f_{\rm{V}6,19,1}$||$7.7248\pm 0.0005$|*|$3.08\pm 0.07$|46.8
 59|$f_{\rm{V}6,59,1}$||$7.7266\pm 0.0004$|*|$4.10\pm 0.07$|41.5
  |$f_{\rm{V}6,59,1}/2$||$3.862 \pm 0.002$| |$0.75\pm 0.07$|8.2
  |$2f_{\rm{V}6,59,1}$||$15.450 \pm 0.002$|*|$0.63\pm 0.07$|7.9
 73|$f_{\rm{V}6,73,1}$||$7.7270\pm 0.0002$|*|$4.77\pm 0.06$|49.3
  |$f_{\rm{V}6,73,1}/2$||$3.864 \pm 0.002$| |$0.74\pm 0.06$|7.8
  |$2f_{\rm{V}6,73,1}$||$15.454 \pm 0.002$|*|$0.56\pm 0.06$|8.8
ZV219|$f_{\rm{ZV}2,19,1}$||$14.851 \pm 0.002$|*|$1.6 \pm 0.2$|7.7
 59|$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,1}$||$14.852 \pm 0.001$|*|$2.4 \pm 0.2$|14.2
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,2}$||$14.802 \pm 0.003$| |$1.3 \pm 0.2$|7.9
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,3}$||$14.409 \pm 0.003$| |$1.0 \pm 0.2$|6.8
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,4}$||$0.318 \pm 0.002$| |$1.2 \pm 0.1$|5.8
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,59,5}$||$1.815 \pm 0.002$|**|$1.1 \pm 0.1$|5.7
 73|$f_{\rm{ZV}2,73,1}$||$14.8394\pm 0.0008$|*|$2.53\pm 0.09$|26.1
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,73,2}$||$14.405 \pm 0.002$| |$1.01\pm 0.09$|10.3
  |$f_{\rm{ZV}2,73,3}$||$14.793 \pm 0.002$| |$1.07\pm 0.09$|11.0
N119|$f_{\rm{N}1,19,1}$||$13.5991\pm 0.0008$|*|$1.81\pm 0.07$|19.4
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,19,2}$||$17.176 \pm 0.003$|*|$0.76\pm 0.07$|10.4
 59|$f_{\rm{N}1,59,1}$||$13.5969\pm 0.0009$|*|$1.70\pm 0.07$|19.7
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,59,2}$||$17.177 \pm 0.002$|*|$0.74\pm 0.07$|8.4
 73|$f_{\rm{N}1,73,1}$||$13.5972\pm 0.0003$|*|$3.38\pm 0.05$|28.4
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,73,2}$||$17.1767\pm 0.0006$|*|$1.67\pm 0.05$|24.6
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,73,3}$||$21.203 \pm 0.001$|*|$0.71\pm 0.05$|9.1
  |$f_{\rm{N}1,73,4}$||$21.348 \pm 0.002$| |$0.59\pm 0.05$|7.8

Notes. *Frequency values consistent with Chehlaeh et al. (2018).

**Frequency values consistent with Zhang et al. (2012).

APPENDIX D: BINARY EPHEMERIS

The top panel shows the linear ephemeris of V551 Aur by fitting a straight line to the observed TOM from all the TESS sectors along with the ground-based minima detected in this study and listed in Chehlaeh et al. (2018). The bottom panel shows the residuals of the fit.
Figure D1.

The top panel shows the linear ephemeris of V551 Aur by fitting a straight line to the observed TOM from all the TESS sectors along with the ground-based minima detected in this study and listed in Chehlaeh et al. (2018). The bottom panel shows the residuals of the fit.

The top panel shows the linear ephemeris of V549 Aur by fitting a straight line to the observed TOM from all the TESS sectors and two eclipse minima given in Chehlaeh et al. (2018). The bottom panel shows the residuals of the fit.
Figure D2.

The top panel shows the linear ephemeris of V549 Aur by fitting a straight line to the observed TOM from all the TESS sectors and two eclipse minima given in Chehlaeh et al. (2018). The bottom panel shows the residuals of the fit.

APPENDIX E: EB MODELLING

The top panel shows the Gaussian process model of V549 Aur. The bottom panel shows the residuals after subtracting the model.
Figure E1.

The top panel shows the Gaussian process model of V549 Aur. The bottom panel shows the residuals after subtracting the model.

The top panel shows the Gaussian process model of V549 Aur. The bottom panel shows the residuals after subtracting the model.
Figure E2.

The top panel shows the Gaussian process model of V549 Aur. The bottom panel shows the residuals after subtracting the model.

The top panel shows the Gaussian process model of V551 Aur for the pulsational variability. The bottom panel shows the residual LC after subtracting the pulsation model.
Figure E3.

The top panel shows the Gaussian process model of V551 Aur for the pulsational variability. The bottom panel shows the residual LC after subtracting the pulsation model.

The figure shows the posterior distribution for the eclipse model and Gaussian process model from exoplanet code for V549 Aur.
Figure E4.

The figure shows the posterior distribution for the eclipse model and Gaussian process model from exoplanet code for V549 Aur.

The figure shows the posterior distribution for the eclipse model and the Gaussian process model from exoplanet code for ZV3.
Figure E5.

The figure shows the posterior distribution for the eclipse model and the Gaussian process model from exoplanet code for ZV3.

Table E1.

The table gives the adopted prior distributions for the pymc3 runs with 6000 samples. Here, |$M1$| is the mass of the primary star, |$R1$| is the radius of the primary star, k is the radius ratio, q is the mass ratio, s is the surface brightness ratio, and |$\mathrm{ ecs}$| represents the two orthogonal components of eccentricity (⁠|$e\cos {\omega }$| and |$e\sin {\omega }$|⁠).

ParametersV6V4ZV3
log(M1)Normal(log(1.375), 1.0)Normal(log(1.05), 1.0)Normal(log(1.20), 1.0)
log(R1)Normal(log(1.728), 1.0)Normal(log(0.83), 1.0)Normal(log(1.039), 1.0)
log(k)Normal(0.0, 10.0)Normal(0.0, 10.0)Normal(0.0, 10.0)
log(q)Normal(log(0.769), 0.01)Normal(log(0.626), 0.01)Normal(log(0.48), 0.01)
log(s)Normal(log(0.5), 10.0)Normal(log(0.5), 10.0)Normal(log(0.5), 10.0)
|$\mathrm{ ecs}$|UnitDisk([1e−5, 0.0])UnitDisk([1e−5, 0.0])UnitDisk([1e−5, 0.0])
ParametersV6V4ZV3
log(M1)Normal(log(1.375), 1.0)Normal(log(1.05), 1.0)Normal(log(1.20), 1.0)
log(R1)Normal(log(1.728), 1.0)Normal(log(0.83), 1.0)Normal(log(1.039), 1.0)
log(k)Normal(0.0, 10.0)Normal(0.0, 10.0)Normal(0.0, 10.0)
log(q)Normal(log(0.769), 0.01)Normal(log(0.626), 0.01)Normal(log(0.48), 0.01)
log(s)Normal(log(0.5), 10.0)Normal(log(0.5), 10.0)Normal(log(0.5), 10.0)
|$\mathrm{ ecs}$|UnitDisk([1e−5, 0.0])UnitDisk([1e−5, 0.0])UnitDisk([1e−5, 0.0])
Table E1.

The table gives the adopted prior distributions for the pymc3 runs with 6000 samples. Here, |$M1$| is the mass of the primary star, |$R1$| is the radius of the primary star, k is the radius ratio, q is the mass ratio, s is the surface brightness ratio, and |$\mathrm{ ecs}$| represents the two orthogonal components of eccentricity (⁠|$e\cos {\omega }$| and |$e\sin {\omega }$|⁠).

ParametersV6V4ZV3
log(M1)Normal(log(1.375), 1.0)Normal(log(1.05), 1.0)Normal(log(1.20), 1.0)
log(R1)Normal(log(1.728), 1.0)Normal(log(0.83), 1.0)Normal(log(1.039), 1.0)
log(k)Normal(0.0, 10.0)Normal(0.0, 10.0)Normal(0.0, 10.0)
log(q)Normal(log(0.769), 0.01)Normal(log(0.626), 0.01)Normal(log(0.48), 0.01)
log(s)Normal(log(0.5), 10.0)Normal(log(0.5), 10.0)Normal(log(0.5), 10.0)
|$\mathrm{ ecs}$|UnitDisk([1e−5, 0.0])UnitDisk([1e−5, 0.0])UnitDisk([1e−5, 0.0])
ParametersV6V4ZV3
log(M1)Normal(log(1.375), 1.0)Normal(log(1.05), 1.0)Normal(log(1.20), 1.0)
log(R1)Normal(log(1.728), 1.0)Normal(log(0.83), 1.0)Normal(log(1.039), 1.0)
log(k)Normal(0.0, 10.0)Normal(0.0, 10.0)Normal(0.0, 10.0)
log(q)Normal(log(0.769), 0.01)Normal(log(0.626), 0.01)Normal(log(0.48), 0.01)
log(s)Normal(log(0.5), 10.0)Normal(log(0.5), 10.0)Normal(log(0.5), 10.0)
|$\mathrm{ ecs}$|UnitDisk([1e−5, 0.0])UnitDisk([1e−5, 0.0])UnitDisk([1e−5, 0.0])

APPENDIX F: LOW-RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPY

Table F1.

The table lists the effective temperature (⁠|$T_{\rm eff}$|⁠) and surface gravity (⁠|$\log g$|⁠) using Gaia DR3 gsphot and the series of low-resolution spectra. The values of |$T_{\rm eff}$| and |$\log g$| were derived by fitting the observed spectra with synthetic spectra. The last row gives the mean |$T_{\rm eff}$| and |$\log g$| values of those derived from the individual spectra.

Source|$T_{\rm eff}$||$\log g$|
Gaia DR3 (gsphot)59434.0
Low-resolution spectrum (this study)  
2021-08-155853 |$\pm$| 2133 |$\pm$| 1
2021-09-135898 |$\pm$| 1784 |$\pm$| 1
2021-09-185938 |$\pm$| 1773 |$\pm$| 1
2021-09-195792 |$\pm$| 2133 |$\pm$| 1
2021-10-055868 |$\pm$| 2994 |$\pm$| 3
2021-10-125792 |$\pm$| 2724 |$\pm$| 2
2021-10-195772 |$\pm$| 4243 |$\pm$| 3
2021-10-225832 |$\pm$| 3484 |$\pm$| 3
2021-10-265746 |$\pm$| 2213 |$\pm$| 1
2021-11-155898 |$\pm$| 1733 |$\pm$| 1
2021-11-215878 |$\pm$| 3653 |$\pm$| 3
2021-12-085853 |$\pm$| 2474 |$\pm$| 2
2021-12-205777 |$\pm$| 2113 |$\pm$| 1
2022-01-035640 |$\pm$| 2413 |$\pm$| 2
2022-02-085827 |$\pm$| 2523 |$\pm$| 1
2022-02-175853 |$\pm$| 2083 |$\pm$| 1
Mean5826 |$\pm$| 2623|$\pm$| 2
Source|$T_{\rm eff}$||$\log g$|
Gaia DR3 (gsphot)59434.0
Low-resolution spectrum (this study)  
2021-08-155853 |$\pm$| 2133 |$\pm$| 1
2021-09-135898 |$\pm$| 1784 |$\pm$| 1
2021-09-185938 |$\pm$| 1773 |$\pm$| 1
2021-09-195792 |$\pm$| 2133 |$\pm$| 1
2021-10-055868 |$\pm$| 2994 |$\pm$| 3
2021-10-125792 |$\pm$| 2724 |$\pm$| 2
2021-10-195772 |$\pm$| 4243 |$\pm$| 3
2021-10-225832 |$\pm$| 3484 |$\pm$| 3
2021-10-265746 |$\pm$| 2213 |$\pm$| 1
2021-11-155898 |$\pm$| 1733 |$\pm$| 1
2021-11-215878 |$\pm$| 3653 |$\pm$| 3
2021-12-085853 |$\pm$| 2474 |$\pm$| 2
2021-12-205777 |$\pm$| 2113 |$\pm$| 1
2022-01-035640 |$\pm$| 2413 |$\pm$| 2
2022-02-085827 |$\pm$| 2523 |$\pm$| 1
2022-02-175853 |$\pm$| 2083 |$\pm$| 1
Mean5826 |$\pm$| 2623|$\pm$| 2
Table F1.

The table lists the effective temperature (⁠|$T_{\rm eff}$|⁠) and surface gravity (⁠|$\log g$|⁠) using Gaia DR3 gsphot and the series of low-resolution spectra. The values of |$T_{\rm eff}$| and |$\log g$| were derived by fitting the observed spectra with synthetic spectra. The last row gives the mean |$T_{\rm eff}$| and |$\log g$| values of those derived from the individual spectra.

Source|$T_{\rm eff}$||$\log g$|
Gaia DR3 (gsphot)59434.0
Low-resolution spectrum (this study)  
2021-08-155853 |$\pm$| 2133 |$\pm$| 1
2021-09-135898 |$\pm$| 1784 |$\pm$| 1
2021-09-185938 |$\pm$| 1773 |$\pm$| 1
2021-09-195792 |$\pm$| 2133 |$\pm$| 1
2021-10-055868 |$\pm$| 2994 |$\pm$| 3
2021-10-125792 |$\pm$| 2724 |$\pm$| 2
2021-10-195772 |$\pm$| 4243 |$\pm$| 3
2021-10-225832 |$\pm$| 3484 |$\pm$| 3
2021-10-265746 |$\pm$| 2213 |$\pm$| 1
2021-11-155898 |$\pm$| 1733 |$\pm$| 1
2021-11-215878 |$\pm$| 3653 |$\pm$| 3
2021-12-085853 |$\pm$| 2474 |$\pm$| 2
2021-12-205777 |$\pm$| 2113 |$\pm$| 1
2022-01-035640 |$\pm$| 2413 |$\pm$| 2
2022-02-085827 |$\pm$| 2523 |$\pm$| 1
2022-02-175853 |$\pm$| 2083 |$\pm$| 1
Mean5826 |$\pm$| 2623|$\pm$| 2
Source|$T_{\rm eff}$||$\log g$|
Gaia DR3 (gsphot)59434.0
Low-resolution spectrum (this study)  
2021-08-155853 |$\pm$| 2133 |$\pm$| 1
2021-09-135898 |$\pm$| 1784 |$\pm$| 1
2021-09-185938 |$\pm$| 1773 |$\pm$| 1
2021-09-195792 |$\pm$| 2133 |$\pm$| 1
2021-10-055868 |$\pm$| 2994 |$\pm$| 3
2021-10-125792 |$\pm$| 2724 |$\pm$| 2
2021-10-195772 |$\pm$| 4243 |$\pm$| 3
2021-10-225832 |$\pm$| 3484 |$\pm$| 3
2021-10-265746 |$\pm$| 2213 |$\pm$| 1
2021-11-155898 |$\pm$| 1733 |$\pm$| 1
2021-11-215878 |$\pm$| 3653 |$\pm$| 3
2021-12-085853 |$\pm$| 2474 |$\pm$| 2
2021-12-205777 |$\pm$| 2113 |$\pm$| 1
2022-01-035640 |$\pm$| 2413 |$\pm$| 2
2022-02-085827 |$\pm$| 2523 |$\pm$| 1
2022-02-175853 |$\pm$| 2083 |$\pm$| 1
Mean5826 |$\pm$| 2623|$\pm$| 2
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.