This is a correction to the paper ‘SNAD catalogue of M-dwarf flares from the Zwicky Transient Facility’ (MNRAS, Volume 533, Issue 4, October 2024, Pages 4309–4323). In the original version of this manuscript, there were occasional errors in table 1 and fig. 1. The estimations of flare energies are calculated incorrectly: the correct value differs from the wrong one by a factor of 4.345. Although this error affects the values shown in table 1, it does not affect the other results of the paper. After applying the necessary correction, the conclusion is slightly modified: for 13 objects, we calculate the flare energy, ranging from |$\sim 1\times 10^{33}$| to |$\sim 93\times 10^{33}$| erg, which is consistent with the higher end of the energy distribution reported in the literature (Yang et al. 2017). There is also an error in the number of features in fig. 1: the correct number of used features is 53. We provide the updated versions of Table 1 and Fig. 1 in this correction.

Flowchart of the active machine learning method used to discover M-dwarf flares.
Figure 1.

Flowchart of the active machine learning method used to discover M-dwarf flares.

Table 1.

Bolometric energy estimations for the subsample of 13 flare candidates. The upper and lower energy errors were defined according to the Gaia EDR3 estimated uncertainties on geometric distances.

ZTF DR OIDEAmplitudeFWHMDistanceSpectraln points
 (⁠|$10^{33}$| erg)(⁠|$\Delta$| mag)(h)(pc)class 
257209100009778|$19.15 \pm ^{3.32}_{2.42}$|–3.0150.23444|$195.41^{+16.28}_{-12.78}$|M778
283211100006940|$10.30 \pm ^{6.71}_{4.23}$|–2.2150.04116|$519.19^{+148.03}_{-120.53}$|M49
385209300066612|$1.55 \pm ^{0.62}_{0.36}$|–2.5910.04154|$252.81^{+46.63}_{-30.98}$|M421
412207100011243|$10.92 \pm ^{3.03}_{2.08}$|–3.1270.07497|$248.12^{+32.29}_{-24.91}$|M514
436207100033280|$2.27 \pm ^{0.54}_{0.41}$|–2.1860.06881|$376.80^{+42.50}_{-35.43}$|M415
437212300061643|$38.99 \pm ^{4.32}_{3.44}$|–4.5600.10187|$171.94^{+9.28}_{-7.76}$|M439
540208400015276|$1.69 \pm ^{0.55}_{0.37}$|–2.1630.04033|$321.89^{+49.02}_{-37.51}$|M623
542214100014895|$2.36 \pm ^{0.10}_{0.10}$|–2.4810.08716|$125.11^{+2.53}_{-2.64}$|M429
592208400030991|$1.84 \pm ^{0.16}_{0.14}$|–3.5430.05552|$130.01^{+5.46}_{-4.98}$|M742
615214400005704|$92.98 \pm ^{44.87}_{20.18}$|–2.6290.26036|$496.64^{+108.08}_{-57.20}$|M420
726209400028833|$6.36 \pm ^{0.19}_{0.18}$|–1.7820.12602|$162.36^{+2.38}_{-2.37}$|M465
768211400063696|$1.02 \pm ^{0.30}_{0.28}$|–2.0430.07152|$243.37^{+33.22}_{-36.45}$|M618
771216100033044|$35.05 \pm ^{6.30}_{7.15}$|–2.1050.18924|$450.52^{+38.82}_{-48.54}$|M333
804211400018421|$8.45 \pm ^{4.82}_{2.22}$|–1.9440.15684|$495.73^{+125.58}_{-70.05}$|M419
ZTF DR OIDEAmplitudeFWHMDistanceSpectraln points
 (⁠|$10^{33}$| erg)(⁠|$\Delta$| mag)(h)(pc)class 
257209100009778|$19.15 \pm ^{3.32}_{2.42}$|–3.0150.23444|$195.41^{+16.28}_{-12.78}$|M778
283211100006940|$10.30 \pm ^{6.71}_{4.23}$|–2.2150.04116|$519.19^{+148.03}_{-120.53}$|M49
385209300066612|$1.55 \pm ^{0.62}_{0.36}$|–2.5910.04154|$252.81^{+46.63}_{-30.98}$|M421
412207100011243|$10.92 \pm ^{3.03}_{2.08}$|–3.1270.07497|$248.12^{+32.29}_{-24.91}$|M514
436207100033280|$2.27 \pm ^{0.54}_{0.41}$|–2.1860.06881|$376.80^{+42.50}_{-35.43}$|M415
437212300061643|$38.99 \pm ^{4.32}_{3.44}$|–4.5600.10187|$171.94^{+9.28}_{-7.76}$|M439
540208400015276|$1.69 \pm ^{0.55}_{0.37}$|–2.1630.04033|$321.89^{+49.02}_{-37.51}$|M623
542214100014895|$2.36 \pm ^{0.10}_{0.10}$|–2.4810.08716|$125.11^{+2.53}_{-2.64}$|M429
592208400030991|$1.84 \pm ^{0.16}_{0.14}$|–3.5430.05552|$130.01^{+5.46}_{-4.98}$|M742
615214400005704|$92.98 \pm ^{44.87}_{20.18}$|–2.6290.26036|$496.64^{+108.08}_{-57.20}$|M420
726209400028833|$6.36 \pm ^{0.19}_{0.18}$|–1.7820.12602|$162.36^{+2.38}_{-2.37}$|M465
768211400063696|$1.02 \pm ^{0.30}_{0.28}$|–2.0430.07152|$243.37^{+33.22}_{-36.45}$|M618
771216100033044|$35.05 \pm ^{6.30}_{7.15}$|–2.1050.18924|$450.52^{+38.82}_{-48.54}$|M333
804211400018421|$8.45 \pm ^{4.82}_{2.22}$|–1.9440.15684|$495.73^{+125.58}_{-70.05}$|M419
Table 1.

Bolometric energy estimations for the subsample of 13 flare candidates. The upper and lower energy errors were defined according to the Gaia EDR3 estimated uncertainties on geometric distances.

ZTF DR OIDEAmplitudeFWHMDistanceSpectraln points
 (⁠|$10^{33}$| erg)(⁠|$\Delta$| mag)(h)(pc)class 
257209100009778|$19.15 \pm ^{3.32}_{2.42}$|–3.0150.23444|$195.41^{+16.28}_{-12.78}$|M778
283211100006940|$10.30 \pm ^{6.71}_{4.23}$|–2.2150.04116|$519.19^{+148.03}_{-120.53}$|M49
385209300066612|$1.55 \pm ^{0.62}_{0.36}$|–2.5910.04154|$252.81^{+46.63}_{-30.98}$|M421
412207100011243|$10.92 \pm ^{3.03}_{2.08}$|–3.1270.07497|$248.12^{+32.29}_{-24.91}$|M514
436207100033280|$2.27 \pm ^{0.54}_{0.41}$|–2.1860.06881|$376.80^{+42.50}_{-35.43}$|M415
437212300061643|$38.99 \pm ^{4.32}_{3.44}$|–4.5600.10187|$171.94^{+9.28}_{-7.76}$|M439
540208400015276|$1.69 \pm ^{0.55}_{0.37}$|–2.1630.04033|$321.89^{+49.02}_{-37.51}$|M623
542214100014895|$2.36 \pm ^{0.10}_{0.10}$|–2.4810.08716|$125.11^{+2.53}_{-2.64}$|M429
592208400030991|$1.84 \pm ^{0.16}_{0.14}$|–3.5430.05552|$130.01^{+5.46}_{-4.98}$|M742
615214400005704|$92.98 \pm ^{44.87}_{20.18}$|–2.6290.26036|$496.64^{+108.08}_{-57.20}$|M420
726209400028833|$6.36 \pm ^{0.19}_{0.18}$|–1.7820.12602|$162.36^{+2.38}_{-2.37}$|M465
768211400063696|$1.02 \pm ^{0.30}_{0.28}$|–2.0430.07152|$243.37^{+33.22}_{-36.45}$|M618
771216100033044|$35.05 \pm ^{6.30}_{7.15}$|–2.1050.18924|$450.52^{+38.82}_{-48.54}$|M333
804211400018421|$8.45 \pm ^{4.82}_{2.22}$|–1.9440.15684|$495.73^{+125.58}_{-70.05}$|M419
ZTF DR OIDEAmplitudeFWHMDistanceSpectraln points
 (⁠|$10^{33}$| erg)(⁠|$\Delta$| mag)(h)(pc)class 
257209100009778|$19.15 \pm ^{3.32}_{2.42}$|–3.0150.23444|$195.41^{+16.28}_{-12.78}$|M778
283211100006940|$10.30 \pm ^{6.71}_{4.23}$|–2.2150.04116|$519.19^{+148.03}_{-120.53}$|M49
385209300066612|$1.55 \pm ^{0.62}_{0.36}$|–2.5910.04154|$252.81^{+46.63}_{-30.98}$|M421
412207100011243|$10.92 \pm ^{3.03}_{2.08}$|–3.1270.07497|$248.12^{+32.29}_{-24.91}$|M514
436207100033280|$2.27 \pm ^{0.54}_{0.41}$|–2.1860.06881|$376.80^{+42.50}_{-35.43}$|M415
437212300061643|$38.99 \pm ^{4.32}_{3.44}$|–4.5600.10187|$171.94^{+9.28}_{-7.76}$|M439
540208400015276|$1.69 \pm ^{0.55}_{0.37}$|–2.1630.04033|$321.89^{+49.02}_{-37.51}$|M623
542214100014895|$2.36 \pm ^{0.10}_{0.10}$|–2.4810.08716|$125.11^{+2.53}_{-2.64}$|M429
592208400030991|$1.84 \pm ^{0.16}_{0.14}$|–3.5430.05552|$130.01^{+5.46}_{-4.98}$|M742
615214400005704|$92.98 \pm ^{44.87}_{20.18}$|–2.6290.26036|$496.64^{+108.08}_{-57.20}$|M420
726209400028833|$6.36 \pm ^{0.19}_{0.18}$|–1.7820.12602|$162.36^{+2.38}_{-2.37}$|M465
768211400063696|$1.02 \pm ^{0.30}_{0.28}$|–2.0430.07152|$243.37^{+33.22}_{-36.45}$|M618
771216100033044|$35.05 \pm ^{6.30}_{7.15}$|–2.1050.18924|$450.52^{+38.82}_{-48.54}$|M333
804211400018421|$8.45 \pm ^{4.82}_{2.22}$|–1.9440.15684|$495.73^{+125.58}_{-70.05}$|M419

REFERENCES

Yang
 
H.
 et al. ,
2017
,
ApJ
,
849
,
36
 

Author notes

A. S. Voloshina and A. D. Lavrukhina contributed equally

Independent Researcher

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.