-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
C Ordenes-Huanca, M Zoccali, A Bayo, J Cuadra, R Contreras Ramos, A Rojas-Arriagada, Unveiling the structural content of NGC 6357 via kinematics and NIR variability, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 533, Issue 1, September 2024, Pages 841–859, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1862
- Share Icon Share
ABSTRACT
NGC 6357, a star-forming complex at |$\sim 1.7$| kpc from the Sun, contains giant molecular clouds and three prominent star clusters alongside H ii regions, very massive stars and thousands of young stellar objects in different evolutionary stages. We present a combined infrared kinematic and time domain study of the line of sight towards this region enabled by the VVVX survey. In terms of kinematics, a novel discovery emerges an asymmetrical distribution in the vector point diagram. Some stars in the sample exhibit spatial proximity to dusty regions, with their proper motions aligned with filament projections, hinting at a younger population linked to triggered star formation. However, this distribution could also stem from an asymmetric stellar expansion event within NGC 6357, warranting further investigation. Comparing these data with Gaia revealed inconsistencies likely due to high-extinction levels in the region. Additionally, owing to accretion episodes and surface cool spots, young stars display high variability. Using the |$K_{\rm s}$|-band time series data, we overcome the extreme levels of extinction towards the region, and compile a catalogue of 774 infrared light curves of young stars. Each light curve has been characterized in terms of asymmetry and periodicity, to infer the dominant underlying physical mechanism. These findings are then correlated with evolutionary stages, aiming to uncover potential age disparities among the observed stars. This study contributes to our understanding the intricate dynamics and evolutionary processes within NGC 6357, offering valuable insights into the formation and development of stellar populations within such complex environments.
1 INTRODUCTION
The study of different star-forming regions and their stellar populations, as well as the reconstruction of their star formation history and structure need astrometric and kinematic data with the lowest levels of uncertainty possible. Thanks to the Gaia satellite (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016, 2018, 2023), information about the position, parallaxes, proper motions (PMs) and radial velocities (RVs), in addition to photometric data, of more than a billion stars have become available in the last few years. The movements of these objects in a six-dimensional phase space allow one to find co-moving groups that belong to the same cluster and helps to identify actual members of each of those structures. Likewise, these data indicate the origin and dynamical evolution of young star clusters (Kuhn et al. 2019). The latter is very important because each stellar population could retain the kinematic signature from the places in which it was born (Wright 2020).
Moreover, star-forming regions that are close to the Sun, such as Upper Scorpius and Taurus, have been kinematically studied in order to expand the number of members of each one or to identify clustered substructures (see e.g. Roccatagliata et al. 2020; Briceño-Morales & Chanamé 2023). These are very suitable sites to study using Gaia data, because, in addition to their short distance from the Sun, they also possess low levels of extinction. Co-moving groups are identified and sub-structures of diverse origin are also recovered.
1.1 From membership to dynamical evolution
Several efforts to reconstruct the structure and star formation history of different star-forming regions through kinematic and astrometric data have also been made. For example, Kounkel et al. (2018) presented an extended study of the Orion Complex and its young stellar object (YSO) population, taking advantage of the available Gaia DR2 and APOGEE-2 data (Blanton et al. 2017). The authors reassemble the properties of the parental molecular clouds that formed the different substructures in this region using the kinematic information available. Furthermore, they discuss the dynamical evolution of several clusters that compose this region. Particularly, they found that the region is composed of five kinematically different clusters. In addition, Zari, Brown & de Zeeuw (2019) also utilized Gaia DR2 data to study the kinematics, ages and 3D structure of the Orion OB association. Stars with a range of ages and also contrasting kinematic stellar sub-groups are found, allowing the authors to conclude that they could have distinct origin. These highlight the capabilities and improvements that Gaia has brought to the understanding of the structures observed towards active star-forming sites in our Galaxy and their birth. However, since Gaia observes in optical wavelengths, these studies are biased towards more evolved objects and/or those located in less extincted areas. Therefore, the kinematics of the youngest, more embedded sources remain unstudied.
The study of the Orion Complex could be performed using optical data because it is a fairly nearby star-forming region, located at approximately |$\sim 400$| pc, which includes sites devoid or with modest levels of extinction (Hillenbrand & Hartmann 1998; Uehara et al. 2021). The study of more distant star-forming regions is important because much of the stellar production originates at distances farther away than Orion. So that, limiting our studies to the latter is not representative of the entire process (Evans, Kim & Ostriker 2022).
Our knowledge of the structure of highly extincted star-forming regions remains scarce, because they are not accessible through visual bands, or at least not their low-mass, less luminous members. This is aggravated when these sites are located at higher distances. Therefore, only a moderate number of stars can be kinematically studied in these regions (Russeil et al. 2020). Most stars in our Galaxy form in those environments, which motivates the study of sites with these features (Kennicutt & Evans 2012).
The Vista Variables of the Via Láctea survey (Minniti et al. 2010, VVV and its extension VVVX; hereafter simply VVVX) has mapped our Galaxy in the near-infrared (near-IR) for approximately 8 yr. Thus, giving access to very extinct regions of the bulge and part of the disc of the Milky Way. These include several star-forming regions which are usually affected by the presence of dust. The VVVX has a wavelength range appropriate to study the stellar content of more extincted sites that are actively forming stars. In addition, in the |$K_{\rm s}$|-band, about 80 epochs are available, spread across a time baseline of 8 yr, allowing to account for flux variability, besides PMs. The latter are very relevant data, because they allow us to study less massive young stars, which are much more numerous (Ordenes-Huanca et al. 2022). Particularly, it helped us to probe intermediate- to low-mass stars in the massive and highly extincted region called NGC 6357.
1.2 NGC 6357 star-forming complex
NGC 6357 is an active star-forming region located in the Sagittarius arm of the Milky Way, towards its bulge, at a distance of approximately 1.7 kpc from the Sun, as reported by recent studies (Fang et al. 2012; Russeil et al. 2012; Lima et al. 2014). It hosts very massive stars (Massey, DeGioia-Eastwood & Waterhouse 2001) and thousands of YSOs in different evolutionary stages (Wang et al. 2007; Broos et al. 2013), which are mainly distributed across three open clusters. One of them is Pismis 24. With an estimated age of |$\sim 1$| Myr, it is known to contain two of the brightest stars in our Galaxy, namely Pis 24-1, a multiple system with at least three components, and Pis 24-17 (Bohigas et al. 2004), all of them with masses of |$\approx 100$||${\rm M}_{\odot }$| (Maíz Apellániz et al. 2007). The other two clusters, AH03J1725–34.4 and the ‘B cluster’, named by Massi et al. (2015), were found to contain several sources with IR-excess, which indicates how young the members of this region are, and were found to have approximately the same size (|$\sim 2.5$| pc) and number of stars as Pismis 24. For the latter, it was estimated to have |$\sim 3600{-}11000$| members. Further, these three clusters are believed to be coeval (Getman et al. 2014).
Other structures are part of the complex, as shown in the annotated false colour image of Spitzer in Fig. 1. Molecular clouds have also been found in the area as well as, at least, three H ii regions. Particularly, G353.2+0.7, G353.1+0.6 and the youngest and brightest one being G353.2+0.9 (Cappa et al. 2011; Massi et al. 2015). Each of them are associated with, and excited by, the stellar members of the three open clusters mentioned above. In addition, three bubbles coexist in the area, usually designated as CS 59, CS 61, and CS 63 (Churchwell et al. 2007). These are structures dominated by dust-continuum emission, but where there is little or no PAHs emission. Each of them is linked to one of the open clusters of the region. CS 61 and CS 63 are thought to be formed due to winds created by the strong ultraviolet (UV) field produced by the luminous OB stars in the area. The origin of CS 59 instead, is not yet clear (Fang et al. 2012).

Spitzer RGB image of NGC 6357 (8 |$\mu {\rm m}$| in red, 4.2 |$\mu {\rm m}$| in green, and 3.6 |$\mu {\rm m}$| in blue). The approximate location of several structures are indicated, such as H ii regions in cyan circles and bubbles in white ellipses. The position of the three stellar clusters is also marked (yellow ellipses).
In the optical, a ‘big shell’ or ‘ring’ has been observed (Cappa et al. 2011; Massi et al. 2015). It is opened to the north and has a projected diameter of |$\sim 60\,{\rm arcsec}$|, as shown in Fig. 2. Due to its shape, its origin has been attributed to a supernova event (Wang et al. 2007), but this has not yet been confirmed.

DSS R-band image of NGC 6357. The approximate location of several structures are indicated, as in Fig. 1. The green box indicates the region of the Spitzer image and the big shell is also labelled.
What is observed in the interstellar medium (ISM) of this region has been interpreted as evidence for triggered star formation. This idea comes from the fact that pillars and shocks have been found in the complex (Westmoquette et al. 2010). These shocks are a consequence of ionization fronts originated by massive stars and induce the collapse of gas cores and clumps (Russeil et al. 2010; Giannetti et al. 2012), hence, the formation of new stars (Bohigas et al. 2004). In addition, a member star, namely [PFR86] G353.19+0.91 IRS 4, appears at the tip of a pillar (or ‘elephant trunk’) and this can also be interpreted as an indicator for triggered star formation. All these facts lead to the inference that a younger population of stars is expected in NGC 6357. However, these younger members have not been confirmed by Hertzsprung–Russell diagrams (HRDs) or by marked differences in the fraction of disc-bearing stars among different structures in the ISM (Fang et al. 2012; Massi et al. 2015), which suggests that the age difference between the two generations could be small.
In the work by Russeil et al. (2017), the authors considered a population of OB stars in the area to investigate age differences between them. These ages were derived considering photometric and spectroscopic data to locate the stars in the HRD and, then, compare their positions with stellar evolutionary models. In their sample, 2 stars from Pismis 24 had an age of |$\sim 1.4$| Myr, whereas 13 objects from the NGC 6357 region were |$\sim 4.6$| Myr old. This suggested that a first star formation event took place at this time, but the main burst occurred 1.4 Myr ago. The latter is in agreement with the ages found for the low-mass pre-main sequence (pre-MS) population of stars of the three main clusters of NGC 6357 by Getman et al. (2014). In this work, the authors derived the median age of distinct clusters comprising different star-forming regions (and not individual stellar ages). Their age computation was based on a combination between the X-ray luminosity (|$L_X$|) and NIR magnitudes of the cluster members and strongly relies on a relationship between |$L_X$| and the mass of pre-MS stars. For the clusters of NGC 6357, they found that all these stars have ages in the range of |$1{-}1.5$| Myr, Still, these age determinations should be taken carefully. The uncertainties of the ages found by Russeil et al. (2017) are mentioned as |$38~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| for O-type stars and |$94~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| for B stars. On the other hand, Getman et al. (2014) mentioned that for a typical cluster (of |$N \sim 20$| stars), the uncertainty will be |$\sim 0.5$| Myr. Nevertheless, all these features make NGC 6357 a very rich complex of gas and dust structures interacting with its stellar content.
Unfortunately, the region presents high levels of extinction, with |$A_{v}= 5.93 \pm 0.49$| mag (Russeil et al. 2012), complicating the study of its stellar population. Nevertheless, efforts have been made to compile catalogues of the young stars in this area based on different wavelength indicators, such as X-ray emission and IR excess. These members have shown to be predominantly massive MS stars or intermediate to low-mass stars in the pre-MS phase, in addition to the existence of protostars (Wang et al. 2007; Feigelson et al. 2013; Povich et al. 2013). The kinematics of the region have also been studied, through the available Gaia optical data. Russeil et al. (2020) investigated the kinematics of OB stars and YSOs members of NGC 6357, along with NGC 6334 and GM1-24. However, the extinction of the region clearly limited the sample of YSOs considered (only 66 between the three sites).
1.3 Variability of YSOs
Depending on their mass, pre-MS stars are known to vary their brightness according to one or two different mechanisms. Due to dynamo effect, magnetic fields in these sources are so strong that they present large dark or cool spots (Petrov 2003) in well-defined regions of the stellar surface (Grankin et al. 2008; Ordenes-Huanca et al. 2022). Spots coupled with rotation lead to periodic brightness variations linked to their rotation rate (Rydgren & Vrba 1983). In these cases, periods are of the order of days (Carpenter, Hillenbrand & Skrutskie 2001; Carpenter et al. 2002).
The second mechanism that applies in principle to all young stars, regardless the mass of the central object, has to do with the presence of a surrounding disc and subsequent accretion events. On one hand, the star accretes material from the inner disc through the magnetic field lines. This, and other processes can create inhomogenities in the dust density of the inner disc that will leave their signatures when crossing our line of sight, leading to decreases in the brightness we observe (Morales-Calderón et al. 2011; Bodman et al. 2017).
On the other hand, the material that arrives on the star originates bright-spots in the stellar surface. Accretion is a stochastic phenomenon by nature and gives rise to mostly irregular flux changes. However, in some cases, bright-spots persist for long enough to produce periodic brightness variations when the star rotates (Kesseli et al. 2016), just like cool spots. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that a low-mass companion can induce periodic or pulsed accretion events (Dunhill, Cuadra & Dougados 2015; Teyssandier & Lai 2020; Guo et al. 2022; Nogueira et al. 2023). Embedded YSOs can also display accretion-related flux changes. These have been mainly attributed to eruptive behaviours over a range of amplitudes and at different time-scales. Particularly, the source can show long-duration outbursts (called FU Orionis or FUors), when accretion rates are enhanced for years (Fischer et al. 2023). Conversely, the star can present short-duration outbursts associated to higher accretion rates maintained from weeks to months (EX Lupi events or EXors) (Contreras Peña et al. 2017). Nevertheless, accretion related variability can also be observed as stochastic and in much shorter time-scales (Stauffer et al. 2016). While this behaviour seems to be more frequent on embedded sources, it can also be observed in Classical T Tauri discs (Robinson, Espaillat & Rodriguez 2022).
All the physical processes mentioned above will leave a signature on what we see in the light curves of pre-MS stars, which can be observed at different wavelengths, including the near-IR. In this frequency, brightness changes related to the stellar photosphere, as well as the inner disc structure can be detected (Rebull et al. 2014; Ordenes-Huanca et al. 2022).
In this work, we have compiled a catalogue of 774 light curves for intermediate to low-mass young stars that have been already identified as members of the NGC 6357 region. Massive stars are not part of this study because they usually appear saturated on VVVX images, unless they are very extinct. However, 3 O-type star candidates are present from the work by Wang et al. (2007). We present, for the first time, brightness variations for these stars over a time span of 8 yr, the VVVX baseline of observations. Each of them was classified according to their degree of periodicity and asymmetry, following Cody et al. (2014). Additionally, for a part of these stars, we could constrain rotation periods.
In order to confirm that these sources are true members of this region, we analysed their PMs and found that, according to the VVVX data, it seems that there are possibly two kinematically different populations. One of them is spatially related to filamentary zones with movements along these structures. If these two populations are actually coexisting, this could imply that a triggered star formation process took place within the evolution of NGC 6357. Nevertheless, this kinematical behaviour can also stem for an asymmetric expansion experienced by the stars of the region.
This paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, we present the previous studies included here to produce our inital census of NGC 6357 with a counterpart in VVVX data. The asymmetry observed in the movements of these stars in the plane of the sky and their link to molecular clouds are part of Section 3, whereas Section 4 is devoted to the period search for a subset of members with light curves available. Also, their classification according to asymmetry and periodicity metrics is included. In Section 5, we relate the two kinematically different populations to different properties, such as our own light-curve classification and parameters from the literature. Finally, in Section 6, we conclude and summarize our results.
2 NGC 6357 STARS FOUND IN VVVX DATA
2.1 Stellar members of NGC 6357 from the literature
The stellar content of NGC 6357 has been studied for several years. Very massive, OB stars have been identified and confirmed as members (Neckel 1978) and have been used to find the distance and extinction to this region (Lortet, Testor & Niemela 1984). Other authors have studied stars in a wider range of masses.
Wang et al. (2007) analysed the intermediate to low-mass population of pre-MS stars in Pismis 24 (roughly in the range |$\sim 0.3{-}16$| |${\rm M}_{\odot }$|), as well as O-type star candidates, and their environment, using Chandra observations. X-rays are known to trace the magnetic activity of stars, which is quite strong in pre-MS stars compared to MS sources and it can vary in time (Damiani et al. 1995). In addition, Chandra observations can reach regions with high levels of extinction, even up to |$A_{V}\sim 500$| (Grosso et al. 2005) and are not affected by nebular emission from the H ii regions, as optical and IR wavelengths are (Kuhn et al. 2021). Therefore, this allowed the authors to identify the young population of the cluster. However, X-rays are more effective to detect the low-mass members. In the work by Wang et al. (2007), 779 stars are presented as part of the open cluster Pismis 24, of which 665 are labelled as highly reliable sources. The remaining are listed separately as spurious background detections. However, most of them have optical or IR counterparts. Still, contamination by AGNs or field stars can be present in their census. The authors estimate this to be the case for less than 4 per cent of the sources
Despite the fact that X-rays are a strong indicator of magnetic activity, which is a recurrent feature in a young stellar population, the identification of members only by this parameter could be biased to Class III objects with only low-mass discs, if any. Pre-MS stars that are still accreting material have proven to be less luminous in X-rays (Prisinzano et al. 2008). As young stars can also host discs or envelopes, this is translated to the observation of an infrared excess in their spectral energy densities (SEDs). Moreover, very massive stars, which are usually located inside a cluster (Broos et al. 2013), can be identified in the optical, where their low-mass and faint counterparts are difficult to detect. All these facts lead to expect that a multiwavelength approach to confirm young members is more appropriate.
The Massive Young star-forming Complex Study in Infrared and X-rays project (MYStIX) characterized 20 near (|$d \le 4$| kpc) young clusters, dominated by the presence of OB stars, and their environments (Feigelson et al. 2013). This work combined optical, IR and X-ray data, from Chandra X-ray Observatory, Spitzer Space Telescope and the United Kingdom InfraRed Telescope (UKIRT) complemented by 2MASS data and archival optical catalogues of OB stars, to present and identify members of massive star-forming regions, including NGC 6357. In their approach, X-ray emission and variability was considered and combined with other parameters, such as, the J-band magnitude and the mid- and near-IR excess, to select the young stellar population of a given star-forming region. The result was the identification of hundreds of OB stars and 31 784 low-mass pre-MS stars spread over the 20 star-forming regions considered (Broos et al. 2013). Particularly, for NGC 6357, 2235 stellar members were identified.
As previously stated, a mostly X-ray-driven census can be biased against heavily accreting objects (either from their envelopes or discs). However, another factor which can affect the detection of young objects at this frequency is that this is usually a variable radiation. There could be a population of these objects that is in a low state of X-ray emission and that will be left out of the MYStIX catalogue. Therefore, the identification of an IR excess in a given source is an important parameter to classify such star as a YSO.
Povich et al. (2013) presented the MYStIX InfraRed Excess Source (MIRES) catalogue, as a complement of MYStIX. Its goal was to look for mid- and near-IR excess emission from sources in the same star-forming regions considered by MYStIX. Here, only IR data from Spitzer/IRAC, 2MASS, and UKIRT were studied, taking a larger field of view than MYStIX. Using these, the SEDs of the objects observed were constructed and analysed. The ones that resembled those from a young star were pointed as YSO candidates. The MIRES catalogue presented sources with IR excess from |$1{-}8$| |$\mu {\rm m}$|, increasing the possibility of finding objects in a low X-ray emission state, which could have been left off the MYStIX list. For NGC 6357, 545 stars were flagged as members and classified as likely YSO in the MIRES catalogue.
For a far star-forming region, MIRES contains data mainly of intermediate-mass YSOs with masses between |$2{\,\rm and \,}8$| |${\rm M}_{\odot }$|, but it is incomplete at solar masses. Furthermore, if there are a large number of field stars towards a given star-forming region, contamination from giant stars with dusty envelopes may be present.
Considering the three catalogues mentioned above, we constructed a base literature catalogue of NGC 6357 members. Particularly, for the MIRES one, we only included sources flagged as members and likely YSOs. In addition, from MYStIX, we only included sources classified as young stars in the massive star-forming region. By combining the three catalogues and removing potentially duplicated sources that are closer together than |$1^{\prime \prime }$|, we ended up with 2534 unique young members of NGC 6357.
2.2 Cross-match between the literature catalogue and VVVX data
The literature catalogue (hereafter LitCat) of 2534 stars was cross-matched to our VVVX data, using a |$1.5\,{\rm arcsec}$| matching radius. The |$1.5\,{\rm arcsec}$| figure was chosen as a compromise between efficiency of source recovery and avoidance of false cross-identification. Even though the astrometric precision of VVV is about 25 mas for stars of |$K_{\rm s} = 15$| mag (Saito et al. 2012), the same level of accuracy is not available for the literature coordinates. In addition, the VVVX survey is seeing limited, so we gauge the average seeing (|$\sim 1\,{\rm arcsec}$|) in our radius optimization. Taking this into account, we found 2243 counterparts out of which only 1883 had light curves available in the |$K_{\rm s}$|-band. These compose the literature census detected in VVVX data (hereafter LitCatVVVX).
A fraction of sources from the literature (277) were matched with more than one star from VVVX data. In these cases, we considered the brightest star in the |$K_{\rm s}$| data to be its most likely counterpart.
Conversely, there were stars in the VVVX data that were matched to more than one star from the literature (82). In these cases, we decided to keep the star from the literature that were closest to the VVVX one and consider it as its counterpart. It is important to mention that, in the great majority of cases, the closest star was also the brightest. Only 2 stars did not meet this condition. So that, by considering the closest star, we are also keeping the brightest star as its VVVX counterpart. In addition, all selected stars shown signs of flux variability, a behaviour fully expected from young stars.
Since blending can induce artificial variability, we visually inspected the epochs of the LitCatVVVX objects with the lowest seeing values. Sources that appeared with close companions, extended or very close to a bright star were removed from the list, leaving us with 1786 stars. As a note of caution, a part of these stars can appear blended on higher seeing images, which could affect their variability.
In order to analyse the kinematic properties of members from the literature, we had to apply a further filter requiring that the detections had sufficient quality for the VVVX pipeline to estimate their PMs (Contreras Ramos et al. 2017). To do so, we considered 1634 out of 1786 stars that had available PMs on the VVVX data set. These comprise the final sample for the kinematic analysis. All the filter mentioned are summarized in Table 1. In addition, all the stars with available PM values in VVVX data, along with their galactic coordinates and photometric data are listed on Table A1.
Conditions applied to the base literature catalogue of young stars with the number of objects that met the condition.
Condition . | # stars . |
---|---|
LitCat | 2534 |
LitCatVVVX | 1883 |
No close or bright companions, point-like | 1786 |
Stars with VVVX PMs | 1634 |
Condition . | # stars . |
---|---|
LitCat | 2534 |
LitCatVVVX | 1883 |
No close or bright companions, point-like | 1786 |
Stars with VVVX PMs | 1634 |
Conditions applied to the base literature catalogue of young stars with the number of objects that met the condition.
Condition . | # stars . |
---|---|
LitCat | 2534 |
LitCatVVVX | 1883 |
No close or bright companions, point-like | 1786 |
Stars with VVVX PMs | 1634 |
Condition . | # stars . |
---|---|
LitCat | 2534 |
LitCatVVVX | 1883 |
No close or bright companions, point-like | 1786 |
Stars with VVVX PMs | 1634 |
3 KINEMATICS OF NGC 6357
3.1 PMs from VVVX data
For stars with |$K_{\rm s}\lt 15$| mag, VVVX PMs have a mean precision of |$\sim 0.51$| mas |${\rm yr}^{-1}$| in each Galactic coordinate. Their computation is explained in Contreras Ramos et al. (2017).
The NGC 6357 sample contains PM values with mean uncertainties |$\overline{e\mu _{l}\cos b} \approx 0.55$| mas |${\rm yr}^{-1}$| and |$\overline{e\mu _{b}} \approx 0.53$| mas |${\rm yr}^{-1}$|, in the Galactic longitude and latitude direction, respectively. In addition, only |$9~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| of them have |$K_{\rm s}\gt 15$| mag.
The sample of 1634 stars with PM values in VVVX data includes 7 O-type star candidates from Wang et al. (2007) and Pismis 24-12, a B-type star of |$11 {\rm M}_{\odot }$| (Fang et al. 2012). Their location in the vector point diagram (VPD) is shown as black contours in Fig. 3. Stars with available PMs in VVVX within a rectangular FoV of |$352.5 \le l \le 353.6$| and |$0.3 \le b \le 1.2$| are shown as grey points with density contours added.

VPD for NGC 6357 stars with VVVX counterpart that have available PM values (black density contours). Grey points represent stars in the same region of NGC 6357 with density contours superimposed.
YSOs in the VVVX data seem to show a higher dispersion in |$\mu _{l}\cos b$| when compared to |$\mu _{b}$|. These stars clearly deviate from the motion of the majority of stars in the same line of sight.
In order to check if this difference in the projected movement on the sky has an artificial origin, we tried to correlate the |$\mu _{l} \cos b$| values with their uncertainties, the average magnitude in the |$K_{\rm s}$|-band of the sources and the colour |$E(J-K_{\rm s})$| affecting them (pair plots shown in Fig. 4). The latter is obtained from the data of Surot et al. (2020). No obvious correlations were found among any of these comparisons. The Spearman correlation coefficient was computed for the three dependencies, obtaining values near zero. Fig. 4 shows that the stars with large negative |$\mu _{l}\cos b$| do not have larger errors (top panels), nor fainter |$K_{\rm s}$| magnitudes (middle panels). For the colour |$E(J-K_{\rm s})$|, however, it seems that a near anticorrelation could be present, particularly for stars with less negative |$\mu _{l} \cos b$| values, which look to be associated with lower reddening. Its Spearman correlation coefficient has a higher value compared to the other two dependencies (|$\approx 0.20$|). This is further discussed later in the text.

Upper panel: error in the Galactic coordinate PM e|$\mu _{l} \cos b$| versus |$\mu _{l} \cos b$|. Middle panel: |$K_{\rm s}$| magnitude versus |$\mu _{l} \cos b$|. Bottom panel: colour excess |$E(J-K_{\rm s})$| versus |$\mu _{l} \cos b$|.
3.2 Independent diagnostic: comparison with Gaia PMs
As mentioned in Section 1, Gaia data are available towards the line of sight of NGC 6357. Using Gaia DR2, Russeil et al. (2020) made a dynamical study of this site and NGC 6334. Here, a very limited sample of YSOs and OB stars was considered to investigate past dynamical history.
We made a similar study using Gaia DR3 data (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2023), finding 731 common objects with PMs measured in both data sets. The comparison between VVVX and Gaia PMs is in the VPD of Fig. 5. In this plot, Gaia equatorial PMs were converted to the Galactic reference frame. Here, a clear difference is observed for the most negative |$\mu _{l} \cos b$| values. Particularly, the |$\mu _{l} \cos b$| dispersion observed in the VVVX VPD is not present on the Gaia PMs. As in Russeil et al. (2020), only one overdensity is observed in the optical. However, it seems that a other small overdensity appears in their data (at pmRA |$\approx -1$| mas |${\rm yr}^{-1}$| and pmDEC |$\approx -3$| mas |${\rm yr}^{-1}$|.) The mean Gaia PMs found for all the stars is very similar to the ones presented in Russeil et al. (2020), with |$\langle \mu _{l} \cos b \rangle _{\it Gaia} \approx -2.36$| mas |${\rm yr}^{-1}$| and |$\langle \mu _{b} \rangle _{\it Gaia} \approx -0.79$| mas |${\rm yr}^{-1}$|. We attribute this discrepancy to the high levels of extinction of NGC 6357, which may prevent to have reliable values of PMs for all the sources in the area using optical data. A similar discrepancy is also found in Alonso-García et al. (2021) for 2MASS-GC 02, the most reddened of the clusters they analysed.

VPD for the 731 common objects between Gaia (violet open circles) and VVVX (black squares).
In Fig. 6, the relation between errors in the PM measurements of the 731 stars in common with Gaia against the |$K_{\rm s}$| magnitude is shown. In these plots, we are considering equatorial coordinates PMs to match with Gaia. One can observe that the error values in Gaia PMs (violet dots) are higher on average than the ones in VVVX data (black dots). This is particularly true for stars with magnitudes between |$12 \le K_{\rm s} \le 14$|, which make up the majority of our data set. Gaia PM errors have lower values only for brightest stars for which VVVX is saturated. In addition, Gaia PMs are known to be affected by systematics, so they could also be underestimated (Lindegren et al. 2021). As errors can also be related to the dispersion of the points in the VPD, we computed the standard deviation of each data set in the Galactic latitude coordinate |$\sigma (\mu _{b})$|, as the Galactic longitude one should be more affected by the presence of the possible two kinematic overdensities. We obtained that, for VVVX values, |$\sigma (\mu _{b})$| is |$\approx 1.14$| mas |${\rm yr}^{-1}$|, whereas for Gaia is |$\sigma (\mu _{b}) \approx 1.38$| mas |${\rm yr}^{-1}$|, demonstrating the wider dispersion of the latter.

Errors in PM measurements, in each equatorial coordinate (RA in upper panel and Dec. in bottom panel) against the |$K_{\rm s}$| magnitude of the common stars between Gaia (violet dots) and VVVX (black dots).
In Luna et al. (2023), the authors also mention that Gaia PM errors (and their RUWE values) could be underestimated in crowded regions towards the Galactic bulge, such as globular clusters. The surface density of the clusters that belong to NGC 6357 has been estimated as 800 stars pc|$^{-2}$| (Fang et al. 2012). This is an order of magnitude lower than that of globular clusters, but the PM errors of Gaia can still be underestimated at this surface density value, according to the results of Luna et al. (2023).
In addition, the distribution of the |$K_{\rm s}$| magnitudes of all stars for which VVVX PM values are available is presented in Fig. 7 as the grey histogram. Of those stars, only the ones at the bright side are in common with Gaia (violet-hatched histogram). Fainter and redder objects are not recovered in the optical. This and the PM error dispersion could cause the observed difference between the projected movement of stars in the near-IR and optical bands. Further, the majority of the 731 stars in common between VVVX and Gaia have magnitudes |$G\gt 18$|, so they are faint in the optical. VVVX data are crucial to observe both populations of stars and properly describe this star-forming region.

|$K_{\rm s}$| magnitude distribution of stars with VVVX PM measurements (grey) and the one for the 731 stars in common between VVVX and Gaia (violet).
In order to better understand the source of the discrepancy between the PMs from VVVX and those from Gaia, we checked for possible systematic errors affecting VVVX PMs. First, we verfieid that the two overdensities in the VPD are observed within each chip, excluding problems in the astrometric calibration of different chips. Secondly, we verified that stars with offset PMs do not coincide with those with envelopes or discs, according to their |$Q_{{\rm JHHK}_{\rm s}}$| reddening-free index. Those stars might have larger FWHM in |$K_{\rm s}$| resulting in an offset centroid with respect to the optical. We found that these objects are not necessarily showing the largest differences between their PMs in the optical compared to the ones in the NIR. This index and the disc/envelope candidates are presented in the next subsection.
We then tried to investigate whether Gaia’s PMs could have a bias restricted to the stars with large extinction. To this end, we tried to correlate the difference in PM values from VVVX and Gaia with the logarithm of the pixel value obtained from ATLASGAL, in 870 μm, where higher values indicate higher dust-continuum emission. Here, the position of a given star was associated to the nearest pixel from the ATLASGAL image. These results are shown in Fig. 8 and confirm that for higher values of dust emission, the PM difference is higher. This is particularly true for |$\Delta \mu _{l} \cos b$|, where a higher difference is observed at approximately Log(Pixel value)|$= 0$| and beyond (top panel). The Spearman correlation coefficient between these two parameters is |$\approx -0.31$|, indicating a moderate correlation. The horizontal black line is located at |$\Delta \mu = 0$| in each Galactic coordinate.

Top panel: difference in the PM values for the Galactic longitude coordinate, |$\Delta \mu _{l} \cos b$|, against the pixel value from ATLASGAL. Bottom panel: same as top panel, but for the PM difference in the Galactic latitude coordinate, |$\Delta \mu _{b}$|. The horizontal black line is located at |$\Delta \mu = 0$| in each Galactic coordinate.
In order to confirm the hypothesis that the problem is in Gaia and not in VVVX, we looker for independent, accurate PMs for this region. To this end, we considered PM values of UCAC5 (Zacharias, Finch & Frouard 2017). We found 8210 objects both with PMs both in Gaia DR3 and in UCAC5. Their PM difference was compared to the near-IR reddening |$A_{K_{\rm s}}$| that we obtained through the Rayleigh–Jeans colour excess method (Majewski, Zasowski & Nidever 2011). Following Zasowski et al. (2013), we used the |$[4.5\,\mu{\rm m}]$| IRAC band, and the magnitude in the H-band, to obtain |$A_{K_{\rm s}}^{\rm IRAC}$| for each star. This comparison is presented in Fig. 9. Here, purple dots represent the mean PM difference in bins with |$A_{K_{\rm s}}^{\rm IRAC}$| width of 0.05 mag. A linear regression was applied to these dots just to highlight that a trend is observed, in the sense of a larger PM difference at larger extinction.

Top panel: difference in the PM values for the Galactic longitude coordinate, |$\Delta \mu _{l} \cos b$|, against the extinction |$A_{K_{\rm s}}^{\rm IRAC}$|. Bottom panel: Same as top panel, but for the PM difference in the Galactic latitude coordinate, |$\Delta \mu _{b}$|. The horizontal black line is located at |$\Delta \mu = 0$| in each Galactic coordinate. Purple dots show the mean PM difference in bind of 0.05 |$A_{K_{\rm s}}^{\rm IRAC}$|.
We currently do not have an independent way to verify if the correct data are those of the VVVX or those of Gaia. Although the latter represents the state of the art for precision PM, we have presented several independent indications that its PM might be biased at high extinction. We believe that this specific point should be investigated further. Meanwhile, as we could not find reasons to discard our measurements in favour of Gaia, we present possible interpretations of them in the next section.
3.3 Possible origins of the observed skewness in longitude PM
Assuming that the PM distribution measured from VVVX is correct, we investigate here possible causes of it. The distribution of |$\mu _{l} \cos b$| values for stars in our catalogue is shown in Fig. 10, where the probability density function of this distribution is depicted. After removing |$3\sigma$| outliers from a sigma clipping procedure, we performed a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) fit to the remaining data, which favoured the use of two Gaussian components for this fit (in black-dashed lines). These could be associated to two different kinematic populations of stars that cluster around two mean PM values.

Probability density function of |$\mu _{l} \cos b$| with its GMM fit. The two components of the GMM model are displayed (black-dashed lines) along with the cuts and ‘uncertain zones’ (not shaded region) adopted to separate the two populations minimizing cross-contamination.
The observed PM dispersion can be interpreted in two different ways. The first one is related to the age of the stars in our sample. Two populations of stars of different ages could be coexisting in this region due to the triggered star formation process expected in the region. So that, the presence of two different populations in not necessarily odd.
To test the age difference hypothesis and in order to look for the origin of the putative two kinematic populations, we imposed limits to define them. First, 550 stars presented values of |$\mu _{l} \cos b \ge -2.4$| mas |${\rm yr}^{-1}$| and were defined as part of the blue overdensity (blue-shaded region on Fig. 10). These are associated with the Gaussian on the right-hand side of the plot. On the other hand, 382 objects that had |$\mu _{l} \cos b \le -4.5$| mas |${\rm yr}^{-1}$| where pointed as part of what we defined as the red overdensity (red-shaded region on Fig. 10). These are associated with the Gaussian on the left-hand side of the plot.
The limits described above were imposed to minimize cross-contamination between the defined overdensities. However, for the limit imposed for the red one, this is very small. Considering only the region where |$\mu _{l} \cos b \le -4.5$| mas |${\rm yr}^{-1}$| (red shaded in Fig. 10), |$56~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| of stars from the left-hand Gaussian will be included. In this same red region, only |$2~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| of stars from the right-hand Gaussian will be included. This indicates that our defined red overdensity is a nearly pure population.
As previously mentioned, three main stellar clusters have been identified within NGC 6357, namely Pismis 24, AH03J1725–34.4 and ‘B cluster’ (Massi et al. 2015). Using the limits mentioned above, we can confirm that the different kinematic populations are not correlated preferentially with the projected spatial location of any of the three clusters. The spatial distribution of the two kinematically different populations is shown in Fig. 11. Here, blue overdensity stars are represented as blue points, whereas the red overdensity is in red triangles and they are plotted over the 870-μm image from ATLASGAL (Schuller et al. 2009). It is observed that objects from both overdensities are present in all the three main stellar clusters of NGC 6357. However, stars from the red overdensity seem to be located in regions where emission from the dust continuum is higher, whereas stars from the blue overdensity are mostly related to areas devoid of dust.

Spatial distribution of all literature sources in VVVX data coloured according to the overdensity they belong to blue points or in red triangles, according to the limits imposed. These stars are superimposed on the 870-μm image of ATLASGAL, indicating the dust continuum emission.
This last is demonstrated and highlighted in Fig. 12, where the the logarithm of the ATLASGAL flux in the central pixel of each star is shown against |$\mu _{l} \cos b$|. The horizontal stack of points is related to stars that were located in bad pixels of the image, in which we fixed them to a minimum value for the emission, related to noise. The ones from the red overdensity display higher pixel values than the ones from the blue overdensity, indicating that they are more related to dusty regions. However, as contamination from one overdensity to the other may still be present, a part of these objects are in regions where dust emission is low, as one can observe in the right panel from Fig. 12, which shows the distribution of the logarithm of the pixel value for each overdensity.

Left panel: distribution of the logarithm of the pixel values from ATLASGAL image in the position of each star. Right panel: histogram of the distribution of the logarithm of the pixel values from ATLASGAL for both overdensities (in blue and red). Bad pixel values are not included.
To further study the relation between the projected movement of stars and dust regions and to complement the ATLASGAL image, we plotted the PM vectors of stars in each overdensity onto the Spitzer Space Telescope GLIMPSE 8-|$\mu {\rm m}$| mosaic image of higher spatial resolution (Churchwell et al. 2009). In the latter, filamentary regions are observed and associated to the presence of dust. Raw PMs for the blue overdensity are shown in the left panel of Fig. 13, whereas the ones for the red overdensity are in Fig. 14. Here, the vector lengths are merely orientative, but they all share the same scale. Note that the PM vectors here include the disc rotation and the movement of the Sun around the centre of the Galaxy.

Stars belonging to the blue overdensity superimposed on the Spitzer 8-|$\mu {\rm m}$| image of NGC 6357 region. Each arrow represents the apparent movement of a given star, according to its values of PMs. Left panel: raw PM values; middle panel: PMs without the rotation of the Galaxy; right panel: PMs without the mean of the group PM for each coordinate.

Same as Fig. 13, but now for objects belonging to the red overdensity.
In order to remove the rotation of the Galactic disc, we considered stars within a control region located outside NGC 6357 but at approximately the same Galactic latitude. We built the colour–magnitude diagram (CMD) of those objects and selected only the stars that appear to belong to the disc due to their position on this diagram. All of them had magnitudes in the range |$10.5 \le K_{\rm s} \le 13$|. From them, we considered only the ones that shown PM errors less than the mean of the VVVX PM uncertainties, to assure a good measurement of these quantities. For those objects, that we assume to belong to the disc, we computed their mean PM in each Galactic coordinate (|$\mu _{l}\cos b, \mu _{b})= (-2.549, -0.779)$| mas |${\rm yr}^{-1}$|. This was then subtracted from the raw PMs, resulting in what is shown in the middle panel of Figs 13 and 14. For the blue overdensity, one can observe that their orderly movement is lost, while for the red ovedensity this does not happen. From this, we can infer that stars from the blue overdensity have had more time to interact dynamically and reach a relaxed state. Objects from the red overdensity, even if we subtract the rotation of the Galaxy, keep their ordered motion and they follow the filaments of the region. This suggests that they are a younger population, whose movement is dominated by that of the molecular cloud it is attached to.
Furthermore, to investigate the local kinematic substructure within a group (expansion, for instance), we computed the mean of the motion in each coordinate for the two overdensities and subtracted them from the raw PMs. This is shown in the right panel of Figs 13 and 14. In both cases, the ordered motion of stars is lost. For stars in the red overdensity, they could move as a group because they are in a more dense environment or because they are younger than objects from the blue overdensity.
In order to further characterize similarities and differences of the two possible kinematic populations, we produced a CMD for stars of our catalogue that belong to each kinematic population shown in Fig. 15. Pre-MS Padova isochrones of 100, 10, and 1 Myr (left to right) from Bressan et al. (2012) are shown. The latter is highlighted because it represents the age of the region. They have been reddened using |$A_V = 5.93$| (Russeil et al. 2012) and located at a distance of 1.7 kpc. Both populations could be associated to young stars in the region. However, sources from the red overdensity seem to have higher colour dispersion than the ones from the blue overdensity. This is emphasized in the inset panel, where a histogram for the colour |$J-K_{\rm s}$| of each overdensity is presented.

CMDs for the two kinematically different populations of stars (blue overdensity on the left panel and the red one on the right panel). Grey points represent all the stars with available PMs. Pre-MS Padova isochrones of 100 (dot–dashed line), 10 (dashed line), and 1 Myr (thick solid line) from Bressan et al. (2012) are also shown. These have been reddened considering |$Av=5.93$| (Russeil et al. 2012), using the extinction law of Rieke & Lebofsky (1985) and located at a distance of |$d=1.7$| kpc. The inset panel shows a histogram for the colour |$J-K_{\rm s}$| of each overdensity.
As observed in the CMDs in Fig. 15, there is a higher spread in colour for red overdensity stars. While members of the blue population are seen closer to the 1 Myr isochrone, the ones from the red population are more spread along the horizontal axis (also shown in the inset panel of Fig. 15). This can be attributed to two main factors. The first one is the degree of differential extinction of the region, which would make them look redder than they are. The second one is the age of the sources themselves. If these objects are associated to regions in which extinction should be more homogeneous, as filamentary regions could be, then we could relate this spread to their age. As they are further away from the isochrones shown, this could indicate a younger age compared to the ones from the blue overdensity. Nevertheless, the observed colour can also be affected by the presence of discs or envelopes surrounding these stars.
Therefore, to disentangle reddening from the presence of these structures, we have computed the reddening free index |$Q_{{\rm JHHK}_{\rm s}}$|, defined in Damiani et al. (2006) as
Its values against the |$H-K_{\rm s}$| colour, for stars belonging to the two kinematic overdensities, are shown in Fig. 16. The location of dwarf stars, only with photospheric colours, is depicted as a green line (Bessell & Brett 1988) and its minimum value is represented by the horizontal dashed line. This dwarf location has been reddened considering |$A_V=5.93$| mag from Russeil et al. (2012).

Reddening free index |$Q_{{\rm JHHK}_{\rm s}}$| versus |$H-K_{\rm s}$| of stars with available VVVX PMs and coloured by the kinematic overdensity they are part of. Stars with |$K_{\rm s}$| excess that are |$3\sigma$| away from the mean of the photospheric colours are marked as full cyan circles (magenta triangles) if they are part also from the blue (red) overdensity. The solid green line depicts the location of dwarf stars.
The |$Q_{{\rm JHHK}_{\rm s}}$| index helps to discriminate between stars affected by extinction (located to the right of the dwarf location, along the extinction vector |$A_V$|) and those with an excess in the |$K_{\rm s}$|-band due to the presence of envelopes or discs (located below the dashed horizontal line and along the |$K_{\rm s}^{\rm excess}$| vector).
First, it is observed here that red overdensity stars are indeed more extincted. On the other hand, following Damiani et al. (2006), we selected stars |$3\sigma$| away from normal photosphere colours and along the |$K_{\rm s}^{\rm excess}$| vector, that is, candidates for having envelopes or discs. We obtained that the fraction of these candidates is higher for the blue overdensity (cyan full circles) than for the red one (magenta full triangles), when considering |$A_{V}= 5.93$|. This finding can argue against the red overdensity being younger that the blue one. However, when we move to higher extinction values, as the red overdensity is, we observed that the fraction of stars with |$K_{\rm s}$| excess from this kinematic population increases. This is further explained on Appendix B.
Again, an age gradient is not completely unexpected, since it could be attributed to a triggered star formation process, which was already been invoked in several papers (see e.g. Wang et al. 2007, Cappa et al. 2011, Fang et al. 2012, Massi et al. 2015). However, the origin of this second star formation event is still debated. A big shell in H|$\alpha$| data, as well in the DSS R band, is observed towards NGC 6357 (Fig. 2) and it has been associated with a supernova event. Either this or the expansion of the bubble CS 61 have been invoked as the possible origins of the compression of the remaining gas in the region. However, through our data, the expansion of the shell is favoured. The big shell encompasses a larger region than the three clusters of NGC 6357. Therefore, its expansion could push the material in a coherent direction and generate the orderly motion observed in the PMs of the younger stars.
Nevertheless, the second plausible explanation for the observed PM behaviour could be related to an asymmetric expansion of the stars. The latter was detected in the Vela OB2 association by Armstrong et al. (2020), where two kinematic populations were found. The expansion was confirmed by considering positions, parallaxes and RVs of the stars, in addition to their PMs, to obtain their positions X, Y, Z and velocities U, V, W in the Galactic Cartesian coordinate system. Unfortunately, for great majority of the stars in our sample, RVs are not available in the literature, which does not allow us to confirm whether these stars are also expanding. However, we cannot rule out that this is could be the origin of the two observed kinematic populations, particularly due to the higher dispersion found for the |$\mu _{l} \cos b$| PM values.
This latter hypothesis is favoured through the fraction of stars that are candidates of having discs or envelopes, found through the |$Q_{{\rm JHHK}_{\rm s}}$| index. Stars from the blue overdensity have a higher fraction of these candidates and this could rule out an age difference between both kinematic overdensities. Stars with discs are expected to be younger than those without them, which may occur if their evolution is under isolated conditions. Nevertheless, it is important to keep in mind that this region contains some of the most massive stars in the Milky Way. Their presence, in turn, can affect the evolution of circumstellar discs of nearby stars by photoevaporation due to UV radiation of OB stars (Ansdell et al. 2017). Objects with photoevaporated discs can be as young as the ones with discs (Clarke 2007; Anderson, Adams & Calvet 2013; Winter et al. 2020). Therefore, an age difference between both kinematic populations could remain plausible.
4 LIGHT-CURVE CLASSIFICATION
4.1 Period search
Each object in the LitCatVVVX filtered for spatial contaminants had available |$K_{\rm s}$| light curves. Three main filters were applied to them, in order to obtain a catalogue of reliable light curves. First, we kept the ones that had, at least, 70 data points and, secondly, we only considered the ones in which their mean |$K_{\rm s}$| magnitude, |$\overline{K_{\rm s}}$|, had a value higher than 10.5 mag. The latter with the aim of avoid saturated sources. Considering this magnitude limit and the 1 Myr Padova isochrone from Bressan et al. (2012), stars of masses |$M\approx 7 {\rm M}_{\odot }$| and above will be left out.
Besides, as we are interested in real brightness variations, we included a third condition that left only the light curves with median error |$eK_{\rm s}$| less than 10 per cent of the amplitude of the variation |$\Delta K_{\rm s} = K_{\rm s, max}-K_{\rm s, min}$|.
For all the light curves that met the three conditions mentioned above, we computed the Lomb–Scargle (LS) periodogram of its |$K_{\rm s}$| light curve (Lomb 1976; Scargle 1982). As explained in Ordenes-Huanca et al. (2022), the two most probable periods were computed, using the same frequency range of |$7.4 \times 10^{-4}$| and 2.5 |${\rm d}^{-1}$|. Due to the |$1^{d}$| cadence of VVVX survey, periods around that value, 0.5 and 2 d could be artificial or aliases. We therefore removed additional 108 objects having both their most probable periods near these values. It is important to keep in mind here that the ‘periods’ obtained should be more appropriately called variability time-scales, as not all of the light curves show strictly repeating waveforms. The periodicity metric Q, as will be explained later in the text, will help us asses the stability of such ‘periods’.
Regarding the periods, we treated two cases. First, we considered stars with periods that were less than 40 d, as it is the typical time-scale of variation in young stars. These allowed us to account for 561 stars that met the criteria mentioned. For stars where the LS periodogram suggested periods longer than 40 d, we visually inspected their light curves. The ones that showed flux variations at longer time-scales were included. For example, some of these stars showed brightness decreases or increases in the entire baseline of observation or presented slower flux variations. These 213 objects were also included in our list.
These criteria left us with a list of 774 light curves to be classified according to their degree of periodicity Q and asymmetry M. The summary of the filters applied and the number of stars left in the list are presented in Table 2.
Filters applied to the VVVX light curves with the number of stars that passed each.
Filter . | # stars . |
---|---|
Young stars with reliable light curves in VVVX | 1786 |
70 data points, no saturation/alias, true variability, |$P \le 40$| d | 561 |
|$P \le 40$| d + long time-scale | 774 |
Filter . | # stars . |
---|---|
Young stars with reliable light curves in VVVX | 1786 |
70 data points, no saturation/alias, true variability, |$P \le 40$| d | 561 |
|$P \le 40$| d + long time-scale | 774 |
Filters applied to the VVVX light curves with the number of stars that passed each.
Filter . | # stars . |
---|---|
Young stars with reliable light curves in VVVX | 1786 |
70 data points, no saturation/alias, true variability, |$P \le 40$| d | 561 |
|$P \le 40$| d + long time-scale | 774 |
Filter . | # stars . |
---|---|
Young stars with reliable light curves in VVVX | 1786 |
70 data points, no saturation/alias, true variability, |$P \le 40$| d | 561 |
|$P \le 40$| d + long time-scale | 774 |
4.2 Q and M metrics
Young stars have light curves associated to flux changes due to different physical mechanisms, as explained in Section 1. The stability of the period, as well as its tendency to increase or decrease the brightness will allow us to infer the physical process that dominates the variability observed. Following Cody et al. (2014), we considered their two parameters Q and M that serve as a guidance to know this information. These are extensively explained in their work, although for space-based telescopes. Their adaptation to ground-based data, as is our case, is described in detail in the work of Hillenbrand et al. (2022). In this work, we follow the same procedure and as we did in Ordenes-Huanca et al. (2022).
The periodicity parameter Q carries the information regarding the stability of the period and shape of the light curve. In this work, we only considered two Q classes. Quasi-periodic light curves will be the ones that have a shape that is evolving in time, but the period remains fixed, with |$Q \le 0.6$|. Conversely, if the period resulted in an unstable one, an aperiodic classification will arise and |$Q \gt 0.6$|. Therefore, the period obtained is not related to a repeated pattern for those light curves, but to a time-scale of variation. In 8 yr of observations, the light curves in the VVVX catalogue always show evolving patterns, so that, we did not consider the periodic class.
The ‘dominant’ state, in terms of brightness, of light curves is captured by the M parameter that distinguishes between symmetric variations, dominant ‘low-state’ values with sudden increases, or, the opposite, dominant ‘high state values’ with sudden decreases. Bursting light curves have a tendency to increase their fluxes with |$M\lt -0.4$|, whereas dipping ones tend to decrease their brightness and have |$M\gt 0.4$|. If there is no tendency, a symmetric light curve will be placed with |$-0.4 \le M \le 0.4$|.
These two metrics were computed and combined for our 774 light curves. In addition, as in Ordenes-Huanca et al. (2022), long time-scale stars (L) have a fixed periodicity of |$Q=1$|. The metrics and classes of the light curves in our catalogue are plotted in the |$Q-M$| plane, which shows the different categories as separate regions of the plot shown in Fig. 17. Examples for the majority of the categories are provided on Fig. 18.

|$Q-M$| plane for the 774 stars in our catalogue. Each colour and marker represent the classifications from our visual inspection. (QPS: quasi-periodic symmetric; QPD: quasi-periodic dipping; QPB: quasi-periodic bursting; B: burster; S: stochastic; APD: aperiodic dipping; and L: long time-scale).

Light-curve examples for six of the different classifications according to the metrics Q and M. Each class is indicated inside the plots. Only those with stable periods are phase folded (left-hand panels) and their values are indicated on each light curve.
It is important to highlight that both metrics are a guidance to infer the process that can explain the largest amount of variability. However, it is also important to visually inspect the light curves to confirm that what is measured for these parameters is actually related to the behaviour of the light curve. Contradictory cases could appear especially at the limits of each classification. In Fig. 17 are also included our classifications by eye in colours and markers, which are in very good agreement with the metric values for most of stars. Here, we introduced the class QPB for one source, which is related to a quasi-periodic bursting variation shown in the bottom left panel of Fig. 18. In this case, pulsed accretion could be the dominant source of flux change.
As can be observed, the majority of stars are related to aperiodic behaviours (middle and bottom right panels of Fig. 18). In 8 yr of observations, variability due to spots are the ones that can maintain a fixed value for the period, as shown in the upper left panel of Fig. 18. This, because it is linked to the magnetically active regions of the star associated to its rotation. Aperiodic behaviors are more common because, as also mentioned in Ordenes-Huanca et al. (2022), when accretion is present, spots can dominate the variability only in seasons or fractions of the entire baseline of observation. Furthermore, if the amplitude due to spots is small enough, it won’t be observed as a repeatable pattern, leading to stochastic flux variations.
In terms of the asymmetry M metric, the bulk of stars have symmetric light curves. This is attributed to the cadence of VVVX data, which only allow us to observe a lower limit of bursts or dips events. If these occur in less than a day, the probability to observe them is lower. Still, some of these are observed in the VVVX data, but they need to have the sufficient amplitude to be detected in the near-IR. In addition, and as mentioned above, it is expected that a part of the classifications change in time (McGinnis et al. 2015; Ansdell et al. 2020). For example, a light curve that presents bursts in a fraction of the observation can start to have dips in the next season of observation. This means that, overall, no tendency either to increase or decrease the flux will be measured. In 8 yr of observation, this can also be more frequent.
The near-IR parameters of stars in our light-curve catalogue along with their light-curve metrics and classes are listed in Table C1 from Appendix C.
5 DISCUSSION
YSOs variability classes have been related to the age of the stars (Cody, Hillenbrand & Rebull 2022). For instance, QPD stars are expected to become more numerous as the cluster age increases, whereas APD variations should decrease. As a star ages, its accretion rate will decrease, which favours a stable accretion mode (McGinnis et al. 2015). This can lead to a QPD classification. In addition, accretion processes should be dominant in the flux variability of younger stars with quasi-periodic bursts more related to this population and due to their higher accretion rates. Besides, the amplitude of variability should decrease for older clusters. Although what we observe in the light curves, and subsequently classify, could be affected by the inclination of the stars, they can still provide indications of any age difference in the stellar content of a given region.
YSOs can be related to objects with envelopes, discs, or even without any surrounding structure. The presence, or not, of such structures is also linked to the age of these objects. A protostar arises embedded in an envelope and, as it evolves, it develops an accretion disc. Accretion processes and outflows dissipate the envelope and, later, the disc, leading to a pre-MS star with a thin or no surrounding structure. When an envelope and/or disc is present, it will cause an IR excess that changes the SED morphology.
Based on the latter, Lada (1987) proposed a classification scheme in which the IR excess is related to the slope of the SED in the IR region. This designation was later complemented with the one of Andre, Ward-Thompson & Barsony (1993), who found younger, sub-mm objects embedded in cold dust. Depending on the value of this slope, different YSO classes are defined. Objects that are still embedded in an infalling envelope are the ones that compose class 0, whereas class I stars are surrounded by an envelope and a circumstellar disc. These are not detected in optical bands, linking them to protostars. On the other hand, class II objects are the ones with a surrounding disc and they have been associated with Classical T Tauri stars (CTTSs). Finally, sources categorized as class III have very low-mass or no discs. As a young star evolves, it will pass from being a class 0 source to a class III. Therefore, the fraction of stars in each class can roughly be linked to the age of a given region.
YSOs classes have also been analysed according to their X-ray luminosity. Coronal emission, magnetic flares, as well as strong stellar winds are responsible for the young stars emission at this wavelength. Coronal emission has been related to the so-called soft X-ray spectra, which is in the range of |$\sim 0.5{-}2$| keV. A very soft emission |$\lt 0.3$| keV has been attributed to accretion. On the other hand, magnetic flares, giving rise to reconnection events in magnetic loops, have been related to the hard X-ray emission, defined in the |$2{-}8$| keV energy range (Getman et al. 2005). In Prisinzano et al. (2008), the authors define two YSO subclasses to study their X-ray emission and, subsequently, compare it with that of YSOs of other classes. Class 0/Ia is related to stars with SEDs that monotonically increased from the K band to 8 μm. Objects defined as being part of class 0/Ib presented increasing SEDs from the K band to 4.5 μm and decreasing at longer wavelengths. In this work, the authors claimed that stars in younger stages of evolution, such as class 0/I sources, are less luminous in X-rays than class II/III objects, both in total and hard regimes. However, this was particularly true for objects designated as class 0/Ia. Class 0/Ib stars shown similar X-ray luminosities than class II sources. Further, accreting TTSs have shown to be, on average, less luminous in X-rays than ‘nonaccreting’, class III ones (Preibisch et al. 2005).
In this section, we link the light-curve categories, YSO classes and their X-ray luminosities to the two kinematic population of stars found in this work, to check if this age difference is also observed through these parameters.
5.1 Overdensities and light-curve classification
Using VVVX data, we are able to obtain only lower limits for burst or dip events, as mentioned. However, the two overdensities defined in Section 3 are affected by the same limitation, thus enabling a relative comparison. Considering the same limits imposed above for each overdensity, we found that 240 objects of our light-curve catalogue are part of the blue population, whereas 158 are of the red population. The VPD for them is shown in Fig. 19 and contours highlight the presence and location of the two kinematic populations in the light curve sample. Using them, we looked for a difference in the number of stars that have, first, a bursting behaviour (left panel of Fig. 19) and try to relate them to a difference in age. For the putative old (p-old) population, the blue one, |$2.9 \pm 1.1~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| of the objects are part of this class, while |$5.7 \pm 2.0~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| of stars in the putative young (p-young) or red overdensity are bursters. Furthermore, the only QPB star in our sample is part of this likely younger population. In terms of the amplitude of their brightness changes, we could not find a difference in the mean |$\langle \Delta K_{\rm s}\rangle$| of burster stars in each overdensity.

VPD of stars in our light-curve catalogue. Contours highlight the two kinematic populations and each is labelled on the middle panel. Colours indicate their Q and M classifications, as Fig. 17: B, QPB (left panel), QPS (middle panel), APD, and QPD (right panel). The fraction of each class in the different populations is also denoted and coloured accordingly.
Stars classified as QPS are expected to have flux changes due to the presence of spots in their surface. This dominates the variability mostly in Class III objects or weak-line T Tauri stars with weak or no discs. These are expected to be more evolved than disced stars, in which usually accretion is the main source of variability. In our case, we found that both overdensities have a similar number of QPS objects, with |$17.5 \pm 2.9~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| in the p-old population and |$16.4 \pm 3.5~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| for the p-young one (middle panel of Fig. 19). Therefore, we cannot draw a difference in age linked to the fraction of QPS stars. However, this region has several massive stars than can affect the evolution of the discs due to photoevaporation.
For stars categorized as APD, we found that both overdensities have a similar fraction of objects being part of this class. Around |$11.2 \pm 2.3~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| for the p-old population, whereas the p-young has |$10.1 \pm 2.6~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$|. However, QPD stars are mostly related to the p-old population, with |$2.9 \pm 1.1~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$|, whereas the p-young overdensity has only one QPD star which represents the |$0.7 \pm 0.6~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$|. It is important to mention that all these ratio values could be biased by completeness. The VPD for both classes related to dipping behaviors are shown in the right panel of Fig. 19.
The results mentioned above, particularly for the number of stars classified as B, QPB, and QPD, point to a possible difference in age and observed through the Q and M metrics. The p-young population have a higher fraction of bursters (B) and the only QPB in our sample, whereas the p-old population has more QPD stars, expected for older accreting objects. However, they are not statistically significant, so we cannot conclusively say that there is an age difference between the two populations. In addition, this has to be taken carefully, because, on one hand, contamination from one population to the other may be present. On the other hand, the dips observed through VVVX data could also be associated to binaries, about which we do not have information. Still, due to one of our filters to compose the catalogue, we know that, at least, these stars do not have close companions. Therefore, the Q and M metrics cannot confirm the age difference as the origin of both populations, but they cannot rule it out either. The latter, particularly because the number of stars in each class is small, affecting the statistics. The origin of both populations due to expansion is still likely.
5.2 YSO classes and overdensities
The MIRES catalogue (Povich et al. 2013) is based on the analysis of the SEDs and the presence of an IR excess. Here, the authors give rough classes for the YSOs in their sample, using photometry from |$1{-}8$|μm and the extrapolation redward of the SED. Objects identified as likely YSOs have been classified either as class 0/I or class II/III, all of them showing an IR excess. We considered these classes to look for rough difference between the fraction of sources in each class in a given kinematic population. This is presented in Fig. 20. Again, contours emphasize the two kinematic populations, whereas stars with available YSO class are coloured according to the overdensity they belong. In the left panel of the plot, only class 0/I objects are coloured. In the p-young one, class 0/I sources constitute |$17.7 \pm 2.4$| per cent, whereas |$10.2 \pm 1.4$| per cent of the p-old population objects are part of this class.

VPD of stars in our PM catalogue. Contours highlight the two kinematic populations and both are labelled on the plots. Stars with available YSO classification are coloured depending on the overdensity they belong to. Left panel: class 0/I stars in red/blue triangles. Right panel: class II/III stars in red/blue squares.
In the right panel of Fig. 20, class II/III stars are shown in coloured squares. Only |$\sim 8.8 \pm 1.6$| per cent of this type of objects are part of the p-young population, whereas a higher fraction of class II/III belongs to the p-old population, which is |$\sim 12.5 \pm 1.6$| per cent. Again, as mentioned in the previous subsection, these values have a difference that is not statistically significant and may be affected by the completeness of the data. Still, the values themselves point to a difference in age between both populations. Due to the statistical significance, we cannot yet rule out either of the two possible origins of the two kinematic populations.
5.3 Kinematic populations and their X-ray luminosity
In the catalogue of MYStIX, the authors give the total (|$0.5{-}8$| keV) and hard (|$2{-}8$| keV) X-ray luminosity for the stars in their sample, including the absorption correction, |$L_{t,c}$| and |$L_{h,c}$|, respectively. From our catalogue of PMs, 955 stars had X-ray luminosities measured. Their distribution of both X-ray emission regimes is shown as the black line histogram of Fig. 21. In this plot, the distribution of |$L_{t,c}$| is presented in the left panel, whereas the right panel shows |$L_{h,c}$|. In both, the kinematic populations are also depicted. For the p-old one, 304 objects had X-ray luminosity values available, while, 190 from the p-young population had these data.

Left panel: distribution of the logarithm absorption corrected total X-ray luminosity Log|$(L_{t,c})$| of stars in our PM catalogue (black), coloured by the overdensity they belong. Right panel: same as left panel, but now for the absorption corrected hard X-ray luminosity Log|$(L_{h,c})$|.
From the total X-ray luminosity, we can observe a flat distribution for the p-young population (red), whereas the p-old one (blue) presents a peak around Log|$(L_{t,c})=30.7$|. This peak could be associated with more evolved class III stars. However, the total X-ray luminosity can be affected by extinction. The soft component of the coronal emission (|$\sim 0.8{-}1$| keV) could not be detected in heavily extincted sources, as class 0/I objects are, so their |$L_{t,c}$| could be underestimated (Prisinzano et al. 2008). Therefore, including the hard X-ray luminosity is crucial. In our case, from the right panel of Fig. 21, we can observe that there is no obvious difference in Log|$(L_{h,c})$| between both kinematic populations. We note here that, despite the fact that the red population has a higher fraction of class 0/I stars, these are not further divided into 0/Ia and 0/Ib classes. The latter was found to have similar X-ray luminosity than class II objects.
6 CONCLUSIONS
An age difference was expected in NGC 6357. First, multiple or sequential star formation events can take place in open clusters (Massi et al. 2015). Still, if this gradient in age is less than 1 Myr, it would be a real challenge to determine if it is an actual behaviour or it could only be attributed to errors in age measurements. The current evolutionary tracks for young stars are not reliable enough to confirm an age dispersion at this time-scale. Furthermore, several indicators of triggered star formation have been found in this site, such as shocks and gas clumps (Russeil et al. 2010; Westmoquette et al. 2010). However, the three clusters that compose NGC 6357, have proven to be nearly coeval, with ages between |$1{-}1.5$| Myr (Getman et al. 2014).
A greater age difference was noted in the work by Russeil et al. (2017). Here, the authors found that two star formation events could have taken place on NGC 6357. Using OB stars from this site, they found that 2 of these massive stars have ages of |$\sim 1.4$| Myr, whereas 13 objects are |$\sim 4.6$| Myr old. Therefore, they conclude that a first star formation event happened 4.6 Myr ago. Then, a second and main burst occurred at approximately 1.4 Myr ago, in agreement with which was found on the work by Getman et al. (2014).
The particular origin of the star formation event related to stars in our sample has been discussed further in the literature. As shown in Fig. 2, a big optical shell is present in a large-scale image of NGC 6357 (also called as the ringlike nebula in Wang et al. 2007, the big shell in Cappa et al. 2011 or the ring in Massi et al. 2015). This shell encompasses a cavity, which has also been labelled as the bubble CS 61 (or G353.12+0.86) and related to Pismis 24.
In the work by Wang et al. (2007), the authors discuss that CS 61 could have been originated through a supernova event. This mainly because of two reasons. The first one is related to the fact that Pismis 24 is located at the north, and not at the centre, of the bubble. So that, its OB stars could not produce such a structure. Second, because of the nearby presence of a Wolf–Rayet star (namely WR 93), they deduce that a sufficiently older population of stars in NGC 6357 was capable of producing such an energetic event that originated this bubble.
However, other authors have proposed that this bubble was created through a champagne flow, in which the molecular material was pushed to the south due to the strong UV field of the massive stars in Pismis 24 (Giannetti et al. 2012). In the work by Russeil et al. (2017), the probable first star formation event in the NGC 6357 region has also been pointed as a possible creator of the bubble and the filamentary regions in its vicinity.
The presence of the bubble is important for triggered star formation processes. Massive stars from Pismis 24 and their strong winds can lead to its expansion and subsequent compression of the nearby molecular material, which surrounds the optical shell. In Russeil et al. (2010), a number of dense cores were observed towards the molecular region, suggesting an ongoing star formation process.
We have studied the stellar components of NGC 6357 both kinematically and through their flux variability in the |$K_{\rm s}$| band, using data from the VVVX survey. We have found that NGC 6357 is composed of two kinematically different populations of stars. These two have not been identified separately in the literature mainly because of the high extinction of the region which limits optical studies.
As observed through the ATLASGAL map, one of the populations, namely the red overdensity, is spatially related to filamentary regions. The projected movements of these objects seem to follow the filaments, as shown in Fig. 14. These two findings would indicate that it could be a putative younger population (p-young) than the one denoted as the blue overdensity (or p-old).
Further, traces of an age difference of the two populations are observed through their Q and M values, for a subset of stars. Particularly, for the fraction of objects classified as B, QPB, and QPD in each overdensity. In addition, the fraction of objects classified as class 0/I in the p-young population is higher than the one found for the p-old one, which could also indicate that the red overdensity would be younger. However, the values obtained are not statistically significant, so we cannot conclusively say that they show an actual difference in age. In addition, we could not find any difference between their total and hard X-ray luminosities. If the difference in age hypothesis is true, we cannot obtain how much is it from our data alone. By analysing the CMDs and the evolutionary tracks, we can observe that stars from the blue overdensity have ages around 1 Myr, whereas stars from the red overdensity seem to be younger, although the positions of red overdensity stars in the CMD could be highly affected by extinction. Neither of these two populations would be related to the one of |$\sim 4.6$| Myr identified in the work by Russeil et al. (2017), but our p-old objects can be related to their 1.4 Myr old stars, which is also consistent with the age range found by Getman et al. (2014) of |$1{-}1.5$| Myr. However, due to the uncertainties quoted in these studies, the methods used shall not be sensitive to age differences of less than |$\approx 0.5$| Myr, which may be our case.
Furthermore, according to the findings for the |$Q_{{\rm JHHK}_{\rm s}}$| index, the blue population would not be older, considering that the different classes of YSOs follow an evolutionary scheme, from class 0 to class III. Nevertheless, it is important to keep in mind that the evolution of protoplanetary discs is especially affected by the presence of massive stars in this region, which can photoevaporate these structures. Therefore, we cannot discard an age difference as the origin of both kinematic overdensities.
The ongoing star formation process pointed in Russeil et al. (2010) is in agreement with our identification of a likely younger population of stars spatially coincident with the filamentary area. The origin of the shell and the bubble are still uncertain. However, the coherent motion found for the red overdensity of stars points to the fact that the expansion of the big shell could have led to such an orderly movement. This, in turn, may be related to another possible origin of the two kinematic overdensities found. The asymmetric expansion of the members of this region may also cause a higher dispersion in the |$\mu _{l}\cos b$| values than the one of |$\mu _{b}$|, so we cannot rule out that this may be the source of the observed kinematic behaviour and not necessarily an age difference. Further studies need to be done, particularly related to the measurement of RVs and parallaxes which can complement our data and prove whether expansion is the real cause of our results. From our findings, both interpretations are equally possible.
The two hypothesis mentioned above are based on the PM asymmetry observed through the VVVX data. However, this was not observed on Gaia VPD. Better data are needed (maybe another couple of epochs in a few more years) to clarify whether the VPD of VVVX is correct or not. Maybe even Gaia DR4 can clarify this discrepancy in the future.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
COH acknowledges the support from National Agency for Research and Development (ANID), Scholarship Program Doctorado Nacional 2018–21180315 and ANID Millennium Institute of Astrophysics (MAS) PhD Scholarship. This project was funded by ANID FONDECYT Regular 1230731, ANID Millennium Institute of Astrophysics (MAS) under grant ICN12_009, the ANID BASAL Center for Astrophysics and Associated Technologies (CATA) through grants AFB170002, ACE210002 and FB210003, and ANID Millennium Nucleus for Planetary Formation (NPF) (grant NCN19_171), the Max Planck Society (‘Partner Group’ grant) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Germany’s Excellence Strategy – EXC 2094 – 39078331).
We thank Loredana Prisinzano for her very useful comments, which helped to strengthen the arguments of this study.
We gratefully acknowledge the use of data from the VVV ESO Public Survey program ID 179.B-2002 taken with the VISTA telescope, and data products from the Cambridge Astronomical Survey Unit (CASU). The VVV Survey data are made public at the ESO Archive. Based on observations taken within the ESO VISTA Public Survey VVV, Program ID 179.B-2002.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The VVV and VVVX data are publicly available at the ESO archive http://archive.eso.org/cms.html. Light curves and PMs, obtained through point spread function photometry of VVVX data, have not yet been publicly released but are available on request to the first author.
REFERENCES
APPENDIX A: PARAMETERS OF YSOs WITH AVAILABLE PM VALUES IN VVVX DATA
Table A1 lists the parameters for the young stars with available PM values in VVVX data.
List of YSOs with measured VVVX PMs along with their galactic coordinates; their photometric data, J magnitude, its error |$eJ$|, H magnitude, its error |$eH$|, |$K_{\rm s}$| magnitude, its error |$eK_{\rm s}$|; their kinematic data, Galactic longitude PM value |$\mu _{l} \cos b$|, its error |$e\mu _{l} \cos b$|, the Galactic latitude PM value |$\mu _{l}$| and its error |$e\mu _{l}$| are the columns of the table.
ID . | Galactic longitude (°) . | Galactic latitude (°) . | J . | |$eJ$| . | H . | |$eH$| . | |$K_{\rm s}$| . | |$eK_{\rm s}$| . | |$\mu _{l} \cos b$| . | |$e\mu _{l} \cos b$| . | |$\mu _{b}$| . | |$e\mu _{b}$| . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b328_513_13098 | 352.930 216 | 0.609 676 | 14.2662 | 0.0032 | 13.4426 | 0.0065 | 13.0889 | 0.0014 | |$-$|2.775 | 0.34 | |$-$|0.583 | 0.34 |
b328_513_15831 | 352.796 024 | 0.601 228 | 19.4352 | 0.0466 | 15.3406 | 0.0088 | 13.3499 | 0.0014 | |$-$|7.351 | 0.32 | |$-$|0.403 | 0.25 |
b328_513_20687 | 352.805 617 | 0.585 606 | 19.2672 | 0.0436 | 16.7556 | 0.0213 | 14.5809 | 0.0028 | |$-$|4.186 | 0.6 | |$-$|1.259 | 0.49 |
b328_513_16540 | 352.748 078 | 0.599 246 | 19.4072 | 0.0464 | 16.6946 | 0.0177 | 15.2189 | 0.0044 | |$-$|7.562 | 0.91 | |$-$|0.081 | 0.92 |
b328_513_22367 | 352.757 852 | 0.580 692 | 18.6422 | 0.0212 | 15.3276 | 0.0092 | 13.7159 | 0.0016 | |$-$|10.308 | 0.36 | |$-$|3.619 | 0.29 |
ID . | Galactic longitude (°) . | Galactic latitude (°) . | J . | |$eJ$| . | H . | |$eH$| . | |$K_{\rm s}$| . | |$eK_{\rm s}$| . | |$\mu _{l} \cos b$| . | |$e\mu _{l} \cos b$| . | |$\mu _{b}$| . | |$e\mu _{b}$| . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b328_513_13098 | 352.930 216 | 0.609 676 | 14.2662 | 0.0032 | 13.4426 | 0.0065 | 13.0889 | 0.0014 | |$-$|2.775 | 0.34 | |$-$|0.583 | 0.34 |
b328_513_15831 | 352.796 024 | 0.601 228 | 19.4352 | 0.0466 | 15.3406 | 0.0088 | 13.3499 | 0.0014 | |$-$|7.351 | 0.32 | |$-$|0.403 | 0.25 |
b328_513_20687 | 352.805 617 | 0.585 606 | 19.2672 | 0.0436 | 16.7556 | 0.0213 | 14.5809 | 0.0028 | |$-$|4.186 | 0.6 | |$-$|1.259 | 0.49 |
b328_513_16540 | 352.748 078 | 0.599 246 | 19.4072 | 0.0464 | 16.6946 | 0.0177 | 15.2189 | 0.0044 | |$-$|7.562 | 0.91 | |$-$|0.081 | 0.92 |
b328_513_22367 | 352.757 852 | 0.580 692 | 18.6422 | 0.0212 | 15.3276 | 0.0092 | 13.7159 | 0.0016 | |$-$|10.308 | 0.36 | |$-$|3.619 | 0.29 |
Notes. A part of Table A1 is shown here for guidance regarding its content and structure. The entire table is published in the machine-readable format.
List of YSOs with measured VVVX PMs along with their galactic coordinates; their photometric data, J magnitude, its error |$eJ$|, H magnitude, its error |$eH$|, |$K_{\rm s}$| magnitude, its error |$eK_{\rm s}$|; their kinematic data, Galactic longitude PM value |$\mu _{l} \cos b$|, its error |$e\mu _{l} \cos b$|, the Galactic latitude PM value |$\mu _{l}$| and its error |$e\mu _{l}$| are the columns of the table.
ID . | Galactic longitude (°) . | Galactic latitude (°) . | J . | |$eJ$| . | H . | |$eH$| . | |$K_{\rm s}$| . | |$eK_{\rm s}$| . | |$\mu _{l} \cos b$| . | |$e\mu _{l} \cos b$| . | |$\mu _{b}$| . | |$e\mu _{b}$| . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b328_513_13098 | 352.930 216 | 0.609 676 | 14.2662 | 0.0032 | 13.4426 | 0.0065 | 13.0889 | 0.0014 | |$-$|2.775 | 0.34 | |$-$|0.583 | 0.34 |
b328_513_15831 | 352.796 024 | 0.601 228 | 19.4352 | 0.0466 | 15.3406 | 0.0088 | 13.3499 | 0.0014 | |$-$|7.351 | 0.32 | |$-$|0.403 | 0.25 |
b328_513_20687 | 352.805 617 | 0.585 606 | 19.2672 | 0.0436 | 16.7556 | 0.0213 | 14.5809 | 0.0028 | |$-$|4.186 | 0.6 | |$-$|1.259 | 0.49 |
b328_513_16540 | 352.748 078 | 0.599 246 | 19.4072 | 0.0464 | 16.6946 | 0.0177 | 15.2189 | 0.0044 | |$-$|7.562 | 0.91 | |$-$|0.081 | 0.92 |
b328_513_22367 | 352.757 852 | 0.580 692 | 18.6422 | 0.0212 | 15.3276 | 0.0092 | 13.7159 | 0.0016 | |$-$|10.308 | 0.36 | |$-$|3.619 | 0.29 |
ID . | Galactic longitude (°) . | Galactic latitude (°) . | J . | |$eJ$| . | H . | |$eH$| . | |$K_{\rm s}$| . | |$eK_{\rm s}$| . | |$\mu _{l} \cos b$| . | |$e\mu _{l} \cos b$| . | |$\mu _{b}$| . | |$e\mu _{b}$| . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b328_513_13098 | 352.930 216 | 0.609 676 | 14.2662 | 0.0032 | 13.4426 | 0.0065 | 13.0889 | 0.0014 | |$-$|2.775 | 0.34 | |$-$|0.583 | 0.34 |
b328_513_15831 | 352.796 024 | 0.601 228 | 19.4352 | 0.0466 | 15.3406 | 0.0088 | 13.3499 | 0.0014 | |$-$|7.351 | 0.32 | |$-$|0.403 | 0.25 |
b328_513_20687 | 352.805 617 | 0.585 606 | 19.2672 | 0.0436 | 16.7556 | 0.0213 | 14.5809 | 0.0028 | |$-$|4.186 | 0.6 | |$-$|1.259 | 0.49 |
b328_513_16540 | 352.748 078 | 0.599 246 | 19.4072 | 0.0464 | 16.6946 | 0.0177 | 15.2189 | 0.0044 | |$-$|7.562 | 0.91 | |$-$|0.081 | 0.92 |
b328_513_22367 | 352.757 852 | 0.580 692 | 18.6422 | 0.0212 | 15.3276 | 0.0092 | 13.7159 | 0.0016 | |$-$|10.308 | 0.36 | |$-$|3.619 | 0.29 |
Notes. A part of Table A1 is shown here for guidance regarding its content and structure. The entire table is published in the machine-readable format.
APPENDIX B: NEAR-IR REDDENING FREE INDEX
In addition to the reddened model with |$A_{V}=5.93$|, shown in Fig. 16, the plots for the reddening free index against the |$H-K_{\rm s}$| values are presented in Fig. B1, considering different |$A_V$| values that could also fit our data. Particularly, for |$A_{V}=9$| (left panel), 12 (middle panel), and 19 (right panel). These values are proposed by visually inspecting this plot. The dwarf location, reddened according to the corresponding extinction vector, is also shown in each panel (green line).

|$Q_{{\rm JHHK}_{\rm s}}$| versus |$H-K_{\rm s}$| for different values of |$A_V$| considered. The dwarf location according to the extinction value is shown as a green line and its minimum value is marked as a horizontal dashed line. Stars |$3\sigma$| away from normal photospheric values of each model are marked in cyan dots or magenta triangles, depending on the kinematic overdensity they belong to.
In order to compute a fraction of star candidates having envelopes or discs, we considered the following. First, we selected stars that were above the horizontal dashed line and between a colour bin defined by the minimum and maximum colour of the reddened dwarf location. With these, we computed a mean for the |$Q_{{\rm JHHK}_{\rm s}}$|, representative of stars showing only photospheric colours. Then, stars that were |$3\sigma$| away from this mean and along the |$K_{\rm s}^{\rm excess}$| vector (below the horizontal dashed line), were considered as candidates for having envelopes or discs.
We observed that the fraction of stars with |$K_{\rm s}$| excess from the red overdensity increases as they become more extincted. For each |$A_V$| value, the fraction of |$K_{\rm s}$| excess objects belonging to each overdensity is presented in Table B1.
Fraction of stars, including Poissonian errors, considered as candidates for having an envelope or disc for each dwarf model considered.
|$A_V$| . | |$K_{\rm s}$| excess – blue . | |$K_{\rm s}$| excess – red . |
---|---|---|
5.93 | |$0.41 \pm 0.06$| | |$0.16 \pm 0.03$| |
9 | |$0.36 \pm 0.06$| | |$0.20 \pm 0.04$| |
12 | |$0.31 \pm 0.08$| | |$0.27 \pm 0.08$| |
19 | |$0.06 \pm 0.06$| | |$0.39 \pm 0.17$| |
|$A_V$| . | |$K_{\rm s}$| excess – blue . | |$K_{\rm s}$| excess – red . |
---|---|---|
5.93 | |$0.41 \pm 0.06$| | |$0.16 \pm 0.03$| |
9 | |$0.36 \pm 0.06$| | |$0.20 \pm 0.04$| |
12 | |$0.31 \pm 0.08$| | |$0.27 \pm 0.08$| |
19 | |$0.06 \pm 0.06$| | |$0.39 \pm 0.17$| |
Fraction of stars, including Poissonian errors, considered as candidates for having an envelope or disc for each dwarf model considered.
|$A_V$| . | |$K_{\rm s}$| excess – blue . | |$K_{\rm s}$| excess – red . |
---|---|---|
5.93 | |$0.41 \pm 0.06$| | |$0.16 \pm 0.03$| |
9 | |$0.36 \pm 0.06$| | |$0.20 \pm 0.04$| |
12 | |$0.31 \pm 0.08$| | |$0.27 \pm 0.08$| |
19 | |$0.06 \pm 0.06$| | |$0.39 \pm 0.17$| |
|$A_V$| . | |$K_{\rm s}$| excess – blue . | |$K_{\rm s}$| excess – red . |
---|---|---|
5.93 | |$0.41 \pm 0.06$| | |$0.16 \pm 0.03$| |
9 | |$0.36 \pm 0.06$| | |$0.20 \pm 0.04$| |
12 | |$0.31 \pm 0.08$| | |$0.27 \pm 0.08$| |
19 | |$0.06 \pm 0.06$| | |$0.39 \pm 0.17$| |
APPENDIX C: PARAMETERS OF YSOS IN OUR LIGHT-CURVE CATALOGUE
Table C1 lists the physical parameters for the young stars in our catalogue of light curves.
List of YSOs within our VVVX light-curve catalogue with their galactic coordinates, the mean |$K_{\rm s}$| magnitude and its mean error |$\overline{eK_{\rm s}}$|, the periods obtained, the amplitudes of variation |$\Delta K_{\rm s}=K_{\rm s, max}-K_{\rm s, min}$| without outliers, the metrics for the classification of the light curves, Q and M, and our classification by visual inspection.
ID . | Galactic longitude (°) . | Galactic latitude (°) . | |$\overline{K_{\rm s}}$| . | |$\overline{eK_{\rm s}}$| . | |$P(K_{\rm s})$| (d) . | |$\Delta K_{\rm s}$| . | Q . | M . | Class . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b329_201_718 | 353.106 055 | 0.650 226 | 14.854 | 0.045 | 0.556 | 0.656 | |$-$|0.355 | 1.402 | S |
b329_201_1585 | 353.107 178 | 0.647 513 | 12.298 | 0.031 | 0.475 | 0.783 | 0.32 | 0.478 | S |
b329_201_1707 | 353.091 058 | 0.646 978 | 14.025 | 0.032 | 0.299 | 0.651 | |$-$|0.086 | 3.867 | S |
b329_201_1866 | 353.110 169 | 0.646 683 | 13.458 | 0.028 | 0.645 | 0.856 | |$-$|0.377 | 0.477 | S |
b329_201_2028 | 353.099 518 | 0.646 092 | 13.541 | 0.019 | 0.232 | 0.515 | |$-$|0.123 | 6.129 | QPS |
ID . | Galactic longitude (°) . | Galactic latitude (°) . | |$\overline{K_{\rm s}}$| . | |$\overline{eK_{\rm s}}$| . | |$P(K_{\rm s})$| (d) . | |$\Delta K_{\rm s}$| . | Q . | M . | Class . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b329_201_718 | 353.106 055 | 0.650 226 | 14.854 | 0.045 | 0.556 | 0.656 | |$-$|0.355 | 1.402 | S |
b329_201_1585 | 353.107 178 | 0.647 513 | 12.298 | 0.031 | 0.475 | 0.783 | 0.32 | 0.478 | S |
b329_201_1707 | 353.091 058 | 0.646 978 | 14.025 | 0.032 | 0.299 | 0.651 | |$-$|0.086 | 3.867 | S |
b329_201_1866 | 353.110 169 | 0.646 683 | 13.458 | 0.028 | 0.645 | 0.856 | |$-$|0.377 | 0.477 | S |
b329_201_2028 | 353.099 518 | 0.646 092 | 13.541 | 0.019 | 0.232 | 0.515 | |$-$|0.123 | 6.129 | QPS |
Notes. A part of Table C1 is shown here for guidance regarding its content and structure. The entire table is published in the machine-readable format.
List of YSOs within our VVVX light-curve catalogue with their galactic coordinates, the mean |$K_{\rm s}$| magnitude and its mean error |$\overline{eK_{\rm s}}$|, the periods obtained, the amplitudes of variation |$\Delta K_{\rm s}=K_{\rm s, max}-K_{\rm s, min}$| without outliers, the metrics for the classification of the light curves, Q and M, and our classification by visual inspection.
ID . | Galactic longitude (°) . | Galactic latitude (°) . | |$\overline{K_{\rm s}}$| . | |$\overline{eK_{\rm s}}$| . | |$P(K_{\rm s})$| (d) . | |$\Delta K_{\rm s}$| . | Q . | M . | Class . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b329_201_718 | 353.106 055 | 0.650 226 | 14.854 | 0.045 | 0.556 | 0.656 | |$-$|0.355 | 1.402 | S |
b329_201_1585 | 353.107 178 | 0.647 513 | 12.298 | 0.031 | 0.475 | 0.783 | 0.32 | 0.478 | S |
b329_201_1707 | 353.091 058 | 0.646 978 | 14.025 | 0.032 | 0.299 | 0.651 | |$-$|0.086 | 3.867 | S |
b329_201_1866 | 353.110 169 | 0.646 683 | 13.458 | 0.028 | 0.645 | 0.856 | |$-$|0.377 | 0.477 | S |
b329_201_2028 | 353.099 518 | 0.646 092 | 13.541 | 0.019 | 0.232 | 0.515 | |$-$|0.123 | 6.129 | QPS |
ID . | Galactic longitude (°) . | Galactic latitude (°) . | |$\overline{K_{\rm s}}$| . | |$\overline{eK_{\rm s}}$| . | |$P(K_{\rm s})$| (d) . | |$\Delta K_{\rm s}$| . | Q . | M . | Class . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b329_201_718 | 353.106 055 | 0.650 226 | 14.854 | 0.045 | 0.556 | 0.656 | |$-$|0.355 | 1.402 | S |
b329_201_1585 | 353.107 178 | 0.647 513 | 12.298 | 0.031 | 0.475 | 0.783 | 0.32 | 0.478 | S |
b329_201_1707 | 353.091 058 | 0.646 978 | 14.025 | 0.032 | 0.299 | 0.651 | |$-$|0.086 | 3.867 | S |
b329_201_1866 | 353.110 169 | 0.646 683 | 13.458 | 0.028 | 0.645 | 0.856 | |$-$|0.377 | 0.477 | S |
b329_201_2028 | 353.099 518 | 0.646 092 | 13.541 | 0.019 | 0.232 | 0.515 | |$-$|0.123 | 6.129 | QPS |
Notes. A part of Table C1 is shown here for guidance regarding its content and structure. The entire table is published in the machine-readable format.