-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
A Frasca, J Alonso-Santiago, G Catanzaro, A Bragaglia, Rotation and activity in late-type members of the young cluster ASCC 123, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 522, Issue 4, July 2023, Pages 4894–4906, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1310
- Share Icon Share
ABSTRACT
ASCC 123 is a little-studied young and dispersed open cluster. Recently, we conducted the first research devoted to it. In this paper, we complement our previous work with Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) photometry for the 55 likely members of the cluster. We pay special attention to seven of these high-probability members, all with FGK spectral types, for which we have high-resolution spectra from our preceding work. By studying the TESS light curves of the cluster members, we determine the rotational period and the amplitude of the rotational modulation for 29 objects. The analysis of the distribution of the periods allows us to estimate a gyrochronological age for ASCC 123 similar to that of the Pleiades, confirming the value obtained in our previous investigation. A young cluster age is also suggested by the distribution of variation amplitudes. In addition, for those stars with spectroscopic data, we calculate the inclination of their rotation axis. These values appear to follow a random distribution, as already observed in young clusters, with no indication of spin alignment. However, our sample is too small to confirm this on more solid statistical grounds. Finally, for these seven stars, we study the level of magnetic activity from the Hα and Ca ii H&K lines. Despite the small number of data points, we find a correlation of the Hα and Ca ii flux with Rossby number. The position of these stars in flux–flux diagrams follows the general trends observed in other active late-type stars.
1 INTRODUCTION
Stellar rotation and magnetic activity are properties strongly related to the evolution of stars, from the pre-main to the post-main sequence (MS). During the MS phase, the position of a star on the Hertzsprung–Russell (HR) diagram changes very little, so it is not an efficient indicator of stellar age. Conversely, the rotation rate and the level of magnetic activity, which is closely related to the rotation speed, change significantly over the life of a star in the MS due to the magnetic braking. The latter is caused by the angular momentum carried off by magnetized stellar wind.
Since the pioneering work of Skumanich (1972), who discovered the empirical law that bears his name, of the decline of the equatorial rotation speed with the inverse square root of the star’s age, the rotation rate and magnetic activity have been used to estimate the age of stars in the solar neighbourhood (e.g. Barry, Cromwell & Hege 1987; Soderblom, Duncan & Johnson 1991; Barnes 2003; Barnes, Spada & Weingrill 2016; Stanford-Moore et al. 2020; and references therein). Another widely used age indicator is the atmospheric abundance of lithium (e.g. Jeffries 2014; Gutiérrez Albarrán et al. 2020; and references therein).
On the other hand, rotation and activity can also be used as additional criteria, along with the kinematics, lithium abundance, and the position in the HR diagram, for evaluating the probability for a star to be member of an open cluster. This can be of great help in the case of stars in the halo of young clusters or very dispersed clusters. This is the case of ASCC 123, a young and poorly studied cluster. ASCC 123 was discovered by Kharchenko et al. (2005) based on Hipparcos proper motions and BV archival photometry. They found 24 likely members spread over a large region of more than 2° on the sky. They found a low reddening, E(B − V) = 0.10, placed the cluster at a distance of 250 pc, and estimated an age of about 260 Myr. The parameters of this cluster were subsequently reanalyzed by Yen et al. (2018) on the basis of the Gaia DR1/TGAS and HSOY data (Altmann et al. 2017). They confirmed the low reddening, E(B − V) = 0.097, a distance d = 243.5 pc, and revised the cluster age as τ = 130 Myr. Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018), from the Gaia DR2 astrometric and photometric data, reported 55 cluster members and estimated a distance of 233.1 ± 5.5 pc.
In our previous work (Frasca et al. 2019, hereafter Paper I), we studied some of the brightest candidate members of ASCC 123 using high-resolution spectra obtained with HARPS-N at the Telescopio Nazionale Galileo (TNG) with the aim of determining their physical parameters, radial and rotational velocities, and the abundances of some elements. The chemical composition of this cluster turned out to be compatible with the Galactic trends in the solar neighbourhood. The HR and colour–magnitude diagrams (CMDs), as well as the lithium abundance and the Hα emission allowed us to infer an age in the range 100–200 Myr, i.e. similar to that of the Pleiades.
In the present paper, we use ground-based and Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) photometry for the members of ASCC 123 to investigate their photospheric activity and study the distribution of their rotation periods. We use also the HARPS-N spectra already gathered to derive the level of magnetic activity from the Hα and Ca ii H&K lines and the projected rotational velocity (vsin i) to derive the inclination of the rotation axes. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present the observations and the criteria followed to select our targets. In Section 3, we show the results of our work, describing the analysis carried out on both the photometric and spectroscopic data. We discuss our results and compare our findings with other clusters in Section 4. Finally, Section 5 summarizes the main results and presents our conclusions.
2 OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION
2.1 Spectroscopy
In this paper we investigate the chromospheric activity for the single, late-type stars studied in Paper I that are bona-fide members (i. e. with a membership probability Prob = 1) according to Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018). For these seven FGK stars, we follow the same numbering used in our previous work (ID). We use high-resolution spectra taken in 2018 and 2019 with GIARPS (GIANO-B & HARPS-N; Claudi et al. 2017) at the 3.6 m TNG telescope. The reader is referred to Paper I for a description of the data and their reduction. The analysis of these spectra with the code ROTFIT, aimed at the determination of the atmospheric parameters and vsin i, can be also found in Paper I.
Table 1 reports the ID of the observed targets along with the TESS Input Catalog (TIC, Stassun et al. 2019; Paegert et al. 2022) identifier, equatorial coordinates (RA, DEC), effective temperature (Teff), spectral type (SpT), and vsin i, which were already derived in Paper I. The masses (M*) and radii (R*), reported in columns 10 and 11 of Table 1, have been derived from the comparison of the position of these stars in the HR diagram (fig. 8 in Paper I) with the parsec isochrones (age = 155 Myr) and evolutionary tracks (Bressan et al. 2012). The rotation period (Prot) measured from the analysis of TESS light curves (Section 3.1) and the inclination (i) of the rotation axis, calculated as described in Section 4.3, are also quoted in the last columns of Table 1.
Stellar parameters of the late-type members of ASCC 123 from Frasca et al. (2019) and from this work.
ID . | TIC . | RA . | DEC . | Teff . | Err . | SpT . | vsin i . | Err . | M* . | R* . | Prot . | Err . | i . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | (J2000) . | (J2000) . | (K) . | . | (km s−1) . | (M⊙) . | (R⊙) . | (d) . | (°) . | |||
39 | 64 837 857 | 22 35 13.26 | +54 46 24.8 | 6667 | 115 | F4V | 49.1 | 1.9 | 1.38 | 1.36 | 1.67: | ... | ∼90 |
214 | 249 784 843 | 22 38 34.03 | +53 35 08.7 | 5804 | 87 | G1.5V | 100.9 | 3.0 | 1.09 | 1.16 | 0.562 | 0.002 | 75|$^{+11}_{6}$| |
435 | 388 696 341 | 22 42 00.19 | +55 00 58.5 | 5758 | 79 | G2.5V | 11.6 | 0.7 | 1.07 | 0.96 | 3.92 | 0.02 | 69|$^{+15}_{10}$| |
517 | 428 274 538 | 22 43 26.53 | +54 11 58.4 | 5784 | 81 | G2V | 83.6 | 1.9 | 1.08 | 1.13 | 0.579 | 0.002 | 58|$^{+2}_{3}$| |
554 | 361 944 360 | 22 44 00.20 | +54 08 38.1 | 6871 | 152 | F4V | 81.8 | 3.3 | 1.46 | 1.40 | 0.857 | 0.007 | 81|$^{+9}_{10}$| |
F1 | 66 539 637 | 22 45 28.25 | +53 47 06.1 | 5263 | 92 | K0V | 6.6 | 0.6 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 5.83 | 0.05 | 56|$^{+9}_{8}$| |
F2 | 64 077 901 | 22 31 17.98 | +55 02 40.7 | 5237 | 77 | K1V | 7.5 | 0.6 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 5.09 | 0.05 | 59|$^{+10}_{8}$| |
ID . | TIC . | RA . | DEC . | Teff . | Err . | SpT . | vsin i . | Err . | M* . | R* . | Prot . | Err . | i . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | (J2000) . | (J2000) . | (K) . | . | (km s−1) . | (M⊙) . | (R⊙) . | (d) . | (°) . | |||
39 | 64 837 857 | 22 35 13.26 | +54 46 24.8 | 6667 | 115 | F4V | 49.1 | 1.9 | 1.38 | 1.36 | 1.67: | ... | ∼90 |
214 | 249 784 843 | 22 38 34.03 | +53 35 08.7 | 5804 | 87 | G1.5V | 100.9 | 3.0 | 1.09 | 1.16 | 0.562 | 0.002 | 75|$^{+11}_{6}$| |
435 | 388 696 341 | 22 42 00.19 | +55 00 58.5 | 5758 | 79 | G2.5V | 11.6 | 0.7 | 1.07 | 0.96 | 3.92 | 0.02 | 69|$^{+15}_{10}$| |
517 | 428 274 538 | 22 43 26.53 | +54 11 58.4 | 5784 | 81 | G2V | 83.6 | 1.9 | 1.08 | 1.13 | 0.579 | 0.002 | 58|$^{+2}_{3}$| |
554 | 361 944 360 | 22 44 00.20 | +54 08 38.1 | 6871 | 152 | F4V | 81.8 | 3.3 | 1.46 | 1.40 | 0.857 | 0.007 | 81|$^{+9}_{10}$| |
F1 | 66 539 637 | 22 45 28.25 | +53 47 06.1 | 5263 | 92 | K0V | 6.6 | 0.6 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 5.83 | 0.05 | 56|$^{+9}_{8}$| |
F2 | 64 077 901 | 22 31 17.98 | +55 02 40.7 | 5237 | 77 | K1V | 7.5 | 0.6 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 5.09 | 0.05 | 59|$^{+10}_{8}$| |
Stellar parameters of the late-type members of ASCC 123 from Frasca et al. (2019) and from this work.
ID . | TIC . | RA . | DEC . | Teff . | Err . | SpT . | vsin i . | Err . | M* . | R* . | Prot . | Err . | i . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | (J2000) . | (J2000) . | (K) . | . | (km s−1) . | (M⊙) . | (R⊙) . | (d) . | (°) . | |||
39 | 64 837 857 | 22 35 13.26 | +54 46 24.8 | 6667 | 115 | F4V | 49.1 | 1.9 | 1.38 | 1.36 | 1.67: | ... | ∼90 |
214 | 249 784 843 | 22 38 34.03 | +53 35 08.7 | 5804 | 87 | G1.5V | 100.9 | 3.0 | 1.09 | 1.16 | 0.562 | 0.002 | 75|$^{+11}_{6}$| |
435 | 388 696 341 | 22 42 00.19 | +55 00 58.5 | 5758 | 79 | G2.5V | 11.6 | 0.7 | 1.07 | 0.96 | 3.92 | 0.02 | 69|$^{+15}_{10}$| |
517 | 428 274 538 | 22 43 26.53 | +54 11 58.4 | 5784 | 81 | G2V | 83.6 | 1.9 | 1.08 | 1.13 | 0.579 | 0.002 | 58|$^{+2}_{3}$| |
554 | 361 944 360 | 22 44 00.20 | +54 08 38.1 | 6871 | 152 | F4V | 81.8 | 3.3 | 1.46 | 1.40 | 0.857 | 0.007 | 81|$^{+9}_{10}$| |
F1 | 66 539 637 | 22 45 28.25 | +53 47 06.1 | 5263 | 92 | K0V | 6.6 | 0.6 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 5.83 | 0.05 | 56|$^{+9}_{8}$| |
F2 | 64 077 901 | 22 31 17.98 | +55 02 40.7 | 5237 | 77 | K1V | 7.5 | 0.6 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 5.09 | 0.05 | 59|$^{+10}_{8}$| |
ID . | TIC . | RA . | DEC . | Teff . | Err . | SpT . | vsin i . | Err . | M* . | R* . | Prot . | Err . | i . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | (J2000) . | (J2000) . | (K) . | . | (km s−1) . | (M⊙) . | (R⊙) . | (d) . | (°) . | |||
39 | 64 837 857 | 22 35 13.26 | +54 46 24.8 | 6667 | 115 | F4V | 49.1 | 1.9 | 1.38 | 1.36 | 1.67: | ... | ∼90 |
214 | 249 784 843 | 22 38 34.03 | +53 35 08.7 | 5804 | 87 | G1.5V | 100.9 | 3.0 | 1.09 | 1.16 | 0.562 | 0.002 | 75|$^{+11}_{6}$| |
435 | 388 696 341 | 22 42 00.19 | +55 00 58.5 | 5758 | 79 | G2.5V | 11.6 | 0.7 | 1.07 | 0.96 | 3.92 | 0.02 | 69|$^{+15}_{10}$| |
517 | 428 274 538 | 22 43 26.53 | +54 11 58.4 | 5784 | 81 | G2V | 83.6 | 1.9 | 1.08 | 1.13 | 0.579 | 0.002 | 58|$^{+2}_{3}$| |
554 | 361 944 360 | 22 44 00.20 | +54 08 38.1 | 6871 | 152 | F4V | 81.8 | 3.3 | 1.46 | 1.40 | 0.857 | 0.007 | 81|$^{+9}_{10}$| |
F1 | 66 539 637 | 22 45 28.25 | +53 47 06.1 | 5263 | 92 | K0V | 6.6 | 0.6 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 5.83 | 0.05 | 56|$^{+9}_{8}$| |
F2 | 64 077 901 | 22 31 17.98 | +55 02 40.7 | 5237 | 77 | K1V | 7.5 | 0.6 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 5.09 | 0.05 | 59|$^{+10}_{8}$| |
2.2 Photometry
Space-born accurate photometry was obtained with NASA’s TESS (Ricker et al. 2015) for all the cluster members identified by Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018), 55 stars in total. Our targets were observed by TESS in sector 16, between 2019 September 12 and 2019 October 6, and sector 17, between 2019 October 8 and 2019 November 02. The observations in two consecutive sectors allowed us to obtain nearly uninterrupted sequences (with a gap of about 1.4 d) of high-precision photometry lasting about 50 d, with a cadence of 30 min. Being ASCC 123 a sparse and nearby cluster, there is no severe star crowding, also taken the large pixel size of TESS (21″) into account. Indeed, searching in the Gaia DR3 catalogue (Gaia Collaboration 2022), no star with a comparable magnitude (ΔG < 2 mag) can be found within a radius of 21″ around the position of each target. Therefore, we expect no relevant flux contamination from nearby sources. We downloaded the TESS light curves (Huang et al. 2020) from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST)1 archive and used the simple aperture photometry flux (SAP) or the pre-search data conditioning SAP flux, where long-term trends have been removed, whenever available. For the targets fainter than about V = 14 mag, we used the TESS light curves extracted with a point spread function-based approach (PATHOS, Nardiello et al. 2019).
We have also performed multiband BVRCIC photometric observations with the facility imaging camera2 at the 0.91 m telescope of the M. G. Fracastoro station (Serra La Nave, Mt. Etna, 1735 m a.s.l.) of the Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania (OACT, Italy). We observed the three G-type members in our sample, namely, S 214, S 435, and S 517 during nine nights from October 22 2019 to January 16 2020, collecting from 23 to 29 data points per each filter and per each star. Time series data covering about 3–4 h could be acquired only on October 23 and November 4 and 20 2019. We decided to start observing S 214 and S 517 because of their large vsin i, which would imply a rotation period short enough and a modulation amplitude large enough to be able to detect brightness variations with observations from the ground. S 435 was included as a test target because of its spectral type similar to the other two fast-rotating stars. We did not consider the fast-rotating F4V stars S 39 and S 554 for which we expected small variation amplitudes that are hardly detectable from the ground. We used exposure times of 60, 30, 15, and 15 s for the B, V, RC, and IC band, respectively. The data were reduced by subtracting master darks taken with the same exposure times as the science images and by dividing them by master flats. Aperture photometry with a radius of 6 pixels (≃4″) was performed for the unsaturated stars in the field of view of 11.2′ × 11.2′ of each of the observed targets. Standard stars in the open cluster NGC 7790 (Stetson 2000) were also observed in the nights with the best photometric conditions to calculate the zero-points and transformation coefficients to the Johnson–Cousins system. With the latter, we calculated the BVRCIC magnitudes for a number of non-variable stars in each target field that have been used as comparison for doing ensemble photometry of the monitored stars. Although the precision and cadence from this ground-based photometry is not comparable to that of TESS, these multiband data are useful to determine average magnitudes and colours for these three targets. Since in the meantime TESS had started to observe the sky region containing ASCC 123 providing a very precise photometry (although with no colour information), we decided not to continue with the observations from the ground.
The main results presented in this paper are based on the TESS photometry only. For the sake of completeness, we report the results of ground-based photometry in Appendix A.
3 DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
3.1 TESS light curves
The main information we can get from the TESS light curves is the rotation period, Prot, of the star, which can be measured thanks to the rotational modulation of the star’s brightness produced by an uneven distribution of cool photospheric spots. The amplitude of the photometric variations is also a useful parameter related to the magnetic activity.
To measure Prot, we have applied a periodogram analysis (Scargle 1982) and the clean deconvolution algorithm (Roberts, Lehar & Dreher 1987) to the TESS light curves of the members of ASCC 123. For the stars with periods longer than a few days, we merged the data of sectors 16 and 17 to expand the time base so as to improve the precision of the period determination. Ultrafast rotators, such as S 214 and S 517, display a substantial starspot evolution during the 50-d time baseline, so that for these stars we have preferred to analyse independently sectors 16 and 17, obtaining always very similar values of Prot in the two epochs.
We retrieved the TESS light curves for the 55 candidate members of the cluster ASCC 123 according to Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018) but we were able to determine the rotation period only for 29 of them. Indeed, we rejected the stars with Gaia magnitude G > 16.5, whose TESS photometry is too noisy for a meaningful measure of the rotation period. Moreover, we discarded the objects that we recognized as double-lined binaries (SB2) in Paper I. All the periods are reported in Table 2. For illustrative purposes, the TESS light curve and the result of the period search for S 214 is shown in Fig. 1. The light curves of the remaining FGK members studied in Paper I are displayed in Figs B1–B7. The modulation of the star brightness produced by the spots and star rotation is clearly visible for all the targets; exceptions are the two hottest sources. Interestingly, the light curve of S 39 clearly displays two dips reminiscent of a planet transit with a time separation of about 20.31 d (see also Fig. B2). When we started this investigation, this star was not known to host exoplanets and was not included in the list of TESS Objects of Interest. We have then proposed this source for the TESS Follow-up Observing Program and we are planning ground-based observations, whose results will be presented in a forthcoming work. To search for the rotational period of S 39, we excluded the two transits from the TESS light curve obtained merging those of sector 16 and 17 before applying the period analysis.

TESS light curve of S 214 (TIC 249784843) in 2019 (sector 17). The inset in the upper left corner shows the cleaned periodogram of these data; the rotational period is marked with a vertical red line. The inset in the upper right corner displays the data phased with this period.
Rotation periods and variation amplitudes for the members of ASCC 123 derived in this work.
TIC . | RA . | DEC . | Sourcea . | Ga . | |$G_{\rm BP}-G_{\rm RP}^a$| . | Vb . | |$K_{\rm S}^c$| . | Probd . | Ampl . | Prot . | Err . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (J2000) . | (J2000) . | . | (mag) . | (mag) . | (mag) . | (mag) . | . | (mag) . | (d) . | |
467 546 937 | 22 29 27.77 | +53 16 35.4 | 2 001 745 344 554 471 296 | 16.062897 | 2.862838 | 17.233 | 12.225 | 1.0 | 0.0726 | 5.40 | 0.26 |
249 784 843 | 22 38 34.03 | +53 35 08.7 | 2 003 023 629 898 711 680 | 11.816078 | 0.914368 | 12.187 | 10.194 | 1.0 | 0.0836 | 0.562 | 0.002 |
428 062 248 | 22 36 24.68 | +53 15 06.1 | 2 003 011 500 910 639 744 | 15.950929 | 2.474563 | 16.461 | 12.419 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
452 862 919 | 22 34 35.38 | +53 05 22.0 | 2 002 983 291 564 863 872 | 17.446210 | 2.999275 | 17.970 | 13.511 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
66 541 342 | 22 46 07.28 | +53 30 19.7 | 2 002 130 929 538 238 336 | 15.743083 | 2.433725 | 16.906 | 12.153 | 1.0 | 0.0285 | 6.22 | 0.81 |
66 541 343 | 22 46 06.80 | +53 30 19.2 | 2 002 130 929 538 237 952 | 17.163408 | 3.006250 | ... | 13.104 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
298 019 363 | 22 51 06.72 | +54 28 54.2 | 2 002 757 891 681 122 944 | 17.132408 | 3.015108 | 17.150 | 13.098 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
427 062 959 | 22 39 36.92 | +53 07 03.0 | 2 002 201 225 257 443 072 | 13.165830 | 1.231491 | 13.503 | 11.045 | 1.0 | 0.0461 | 5.29 | 0.02 |
64 073 268 | 22 30 24.04 | +54 08 38.9 | 2 001 844 163 164 756 992 | 17.318691 | 3.011692 | 17.970 | 13.382 | 0.6 | ... | ... | ... |
197 755 998 | 22 28 01.49 | +53 47 39.9 | 2 001 820 798 541 996 928 | 17.113846 | 2.967771 | ... | 13.178 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
361 944 444 | 22 44 20.64 | +54 10 08.3 | 2 002 409 582 707 022 592 | 17.910720 | 3.171944 | ... | 13.869 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
361 944 360 | 22 44 00.20 | +54 08 38.1 | 2 002 409 483 936 262 016 | 10.176037 | 0.637021 | 10.410 | 9.168 | 1.0 | 0.0024 | 0.857 | 0.007 |
66 194 421 | 22 43 13.83 | +53 53 46.0 | 2 002 397 698 545 886 592 | 16.360283 | 2.723582 | 17.692 | 12.595 | 0.8 | 0.2267 | 2.15 | 0.06 |
428 274 538 | 22 43 26.53 | +54 11 58.4 | 2 003 161 751 738 142 464 | 11.994698 | 0.997400 | 12.199 | 10.205 | 1.0 | 0.0517 | 0.579 | 0.002 |
64 838 038 | 22 34 51.43 | +54 43 20.3 | 2 003 377 530 902 056 064 | 17.930496 | 3.233290 | ... | 13.856 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
64 837 857 | 22 35 13.26 | +54 46 24.8 | 2 003 378 188 041 736 320 | 10.356592 | 0.619606 | 10.385 | 9.291 | 1.0 | 0.0051 | 1.67 | 0.01 |
343 437 865 | 22 46 13.51 | +53 59 10.6 | 2 002 718 377 980 766 336 | 17.758833 | 3.240006 | ... | 13.636 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
317 272 583 | 22 48 38.34 | +54 44 01.6 | 2 002 822 934 667 425 408 | 17.820822 | 3.080757 | ... | 13.742 | 0.7 | ... | ... | ... |
317 273 771 | 22 48 47.90 | +54 24 53.6 | 2 002 801 150 593 176 064 | 6.112235 | −0.092576 | 6.134 | 6.310 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
367 686 364 | 22 55 46.32 | +54 57 08.8 | 2 002 876 535 856 254 464 | 10.035475 | 0.606720 | 10.255 | 9.050 | 0.8 | 0.0023 | 4.37 | 0.08 |
67 055 292 | 22 50 14.85 | +53 33 28.1 | 2 002 471 537 620 861 056 | 16.707653 | 2.859225 | 17.560 | 12.819 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
64 647 628 | 22 34 50.16 | +54 10 04.2 | 2 003 297 923 690 672 512 | 15.213570 | 2.429640 | 16.294 | 11.692 | 1.0 | 0.0588 | 2.71 | 0.08 |
64 278 003 | 22 31 36.44 | +54 04 19.3 | 2 003 330 050 047 078 144 | 17.137224 | 3.127945 | ... | 13.098 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
64 077 901 | 22 31 17.98 | +55 02 40.7 | 2 006 435 105 245 732 480 | 12.769458 | 1.083085 | 12.805 | 10.839 | 1.0 | 0.0961 | 5.09 | 0.05 |
415 468 735 | 22 29 36.22 | +55 16 16.8 | 2 006 455 961 606 619 520 | 13.152347 | 1.193418 | 13.399 | 11.100 | 1.0 | 0.0291 | 3.99 | 0.03 |
64 561 694 | 22 33 59.64 | +55 42 22.4 | 2 006 489 462 352 825 344 | 15.635015 | 2.427858 | 16.505 | 12.067 | 0.6 | 0.1949 | 6.61 | 0.45 |
3 172 71 523 | 22 48 25.68 | +55 01 22.3 | 2 003 593 864 116 296 576 | 16.727818 | 2.879941 | 17.800 | 12.902 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
416 319 381 | 22 37 50.00 | +56 11 54.5 | 2 006 619 303 494 467 328 | 17.878110 | 3.284651 | ... | 13.790 | 0.6 | ... | ... | ... |
249 725 057 | 22 37 01.79 | +53 34 52.1 | 2 003 031 841 875 970 176 | 16.084180 | 2.522219 | 17.232 | 12.480 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
388 387 063 | 22 40 14.32 | +54 32 27.7 | 2 003 216 972 147 204 608 | 13.000790 | 1.158239 | 13.382 | 10.930 | 1.0 | 0.0534 | 3.19 | 0.03 |
64 646 728 | 22 33 35.99 | +53 58 10.4 | 2 003 271 397 972 097 024 | 13.680970 | 1.375657 | 13.911 | 11.279 | 1.0 | 0.0799 | 4.03 | 0.07 |
388 651 771 | 22 40 48.14 | +54 35 46.6 | 2 003 240 920 885 298 176 | 17.222970 | 2.861937 | 17.820 | 13.303 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
420 123 691 | 22 32 07.17 | +53 42 26.4 | 2 003 259 372 063 199 744 | 13.262769 | 1.266625 | 13.594 | 11.053 | 1.0 | 0.4418 | 13.43 | 0.20 |
388 693 014 | 22 41 34.98 | +54 35 30.0 | 2 003 228 517 019 770 240 | 17.371294 | 3.338816 | ... | 13.166 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
431 151 968 | 22 41 18.32 | +53 17 51.3 | 2 002 297 368 107 185 920 | 16.220058 | 2.902960 | 17.080 | 12.348 | 0.8 | 0.0787 | 0.910 | 0.015 |
66 343 379 | 22 44 17.19 | +53 35 24.7 | 2 002 328 875 988 217 216 | 16.020758 | 2.592554 | 17.219 | 12.356 | 1.0 | 0.0456 | 4.98 | 0.30 |
66 539 637 | 22 45 28.25 | +53 47 06.1 | 2 002 337 603 362 057 088 | 12.563967 | 1.053528 | 12.669 | 10.649 | 1.0 | 0.0483 | 5.83 | 0.05 |
2 046 168 414 | 22 45 28.58 | +53 47 07.9 | 2 002 337 603 353 142 016 | 17.408490 | 1.998825 | 18.077 | 10.649 | 0.6 | ... | ... | ... |
420 304 656 | 22 40 23.86 | +53 49 07.6 | 2 003 120 764 877 992 448 | 17.124058 | 2.955116 | 17.970 | 13.259 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
431 150 096 | 22 41 28.14 | +53 52 51.6 | 2 003 127 705 545 276 032 | 12.836430 | 1.113888 | 12.977 | 10.868 | 1.0 | 0.0697 | 5.24 | 0.06 |
2 046 389 820 | 22 41 06.01 | +53 59 05.8 | 2 003 132 344 098 378 496 | 14.223695 | ... | ... | ... | 0.7 | ... | ... | ... |
452 865 760 | 22 34 58.37 | +53 56 32.2 | 2 003 104 718 883 916 288 | 17.162186 | 3.024750 | 17.610 | 13.226 | 0.7 | ... | ... | ... |
427 060 252 | 22 39 36.76 | +53 52 53.3 | 2 003 136 501 637 932 672 | 15.955221 | 2.871970 | 16.900 | 12.065 | 0.8 | 0.0451 | 0.367 | 0.003 |
66 723 344 | 22 47 59.13 | +53 40 15.4 | 2 002 508 302 542 111 488 | 16.220280 | 2.973432 | 17.560 | 12.251 | 0.9 | 0.0292 | 0.311 | 0.002 |
67 224 655 | 22 52 17.23 | +53 53 39.2 | 2 002 528 402 990 066 944 | 15.586474 | 2.455151 | 16.671 | 11.949 | 0.9 | 0.1094 | 1.737 | 0.031 |
297 927 402 | 22 50 32.54 | +54 02 14.8 | 2 002 543 967 951 224 960 | 16.304932 | 2.683093 | 17.568 | 12.476 | 0.9 | 0.0515 | 1.503 | 0.023 |
343 771 372 | 22 46 34.54 | +54 46 05.2 | 2 003 554 006 818 945 280 | 9.578720 | 0.443725 | 9.703 | 8.837 | 0.9 | ... | ... | |
2 015 953 058 | 22 31 48.85 | +54 59 22.7 | 2 006 387 242 128 323 840 | 14.283266 | 1.744160 | 14.416 | 10.775 | 1.0 | 0.0965 | 5.19 | 0.04 |
64 077 487 | 22 30 51.98 | +54 55 50.1 | 2 006 385 764 659 269 760 | 16.194597 | 2.755547 | 17.110 | 12.358 | 0.6 | 0.0445 | 3.52 | 0.26 |
67 062 121 | 22 50 59.10 | +53 19 00.0 | 2 002 452 708 484 342 656 | 17.461884 | 2.946167 | 17.970 | 13.457 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
388 696 341 | 22 42 00.19 | +55 00 58.5 | 2 003 443 437 181 978 240 | 12.048476 | 0.941633 | 12.261 | 10.418 | 1.0 | 0.0838 | 3.92 | 0.02 |
343 867 253 | 22 47 52.68 | +55 33 18.5 | 2 003 669 180 664 786 944 | 15.195872 | 2.754218 | 15.750 | 11.370 | 0.8 | 0.0305 | 0.464 | 0.003 |
343 778 985 | 22 47 36.61 | +55 10 30.5 | 2 003 645 060 128 342 656 | 16.949617 | 2.980359 | 17.800 | 12.994 | 0.6 | ... | ... | ... |
431 153 083 | 22 41 11.77 | +52 56 27.8 | 2 002 274 106 564 094 848 | 13.922489 | 1.505455 | 14.256 | 11.335 | 1.0 | 0.0780 | 6.90 | 0.03 |
249 801 592 | 22 39 19.22 | +53 29 16.5 | 2 002 270 842 392 282 496 | 10.599697 | 0.758198 | 10.765 | 9.314 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
TIC . | RA . | DEC . | Sourcea . | Ga . | |$G_{\rm BP}-G_{\rm RP}^a$| . | Vb . | |$K_{\rm S}^c$| . | Probd . | Ampl . | Prot . | Err . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (J2000) . | (J2000) . | . | (mag) . | (mag) . | (mag) . | (mag) . | . | (mag) . | (d) . | |
467 546 937 | 22 29 27.77 | +53 16 35.4 | 2 001 745 344 554 471 296 | 16.062897 | 2.862838 | 17.233 | 12.225 | 1.0 | 0.0726 | 5.40 | 0.26 |
249 784 843 | 22 38 34.03 | +53 35 08.7 | 2 003 023 629 898 711 680 | 11.816078 | 0.914368 | 12.187 | 10.194 | 1.0 | 0.0836 | 0.562 | 0.002 |
428 062 248 | 22 36 24.68 | +53 15 06.1 | 2 003 011 500 910 639 744 | 15.950929 | 2.474563 | 16.461 | 12.419 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
452 862 919 | 22 34 35.38 | +53 05 22.0 | 2 002 983 291 564 863 872 | 17.446210 | 2.999275 | 17.970 | 13.511 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
66 541 342 | 22 46 07.28 | +53 30 19.7 | 2 002 130 929 538 238 336 | 15.743083 | 2.433725 | 16.906 | 12.153 | 1.0 | 0.0285 | 6.22 | 0.81 |
66 541 343 | 22 46 06.80 | +53 30 19.2 | 2 002 130 929 538 237 952 | 17.163408 | 3.006250 | ... | 13.104 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
298 019 363 | 22 51 06.72 | +54 28 54.2 | 2 002 757 891 681 122 944 | 17.132408 | 3.015108 | 17.150 | 13.098 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
427 062 959 | 22 39 36.92 | +53 07 03.0 | 2 002 201 225 257 443 072 | 13.165830 | 1.231491 | 13.503 | 11.045 | 1.0 | 0.0461 | 5.29 | 0.02 |
64 073 268 | 22 30 24.04 | +54 08 38.9 | 2 001 844 163 164 756 992 | 17.318691 | 3.011692 | 17.970 | 13.382 | 0.6 | ... | ... | ... |
197 755 998 | 22 28 01.49 | +53 47 39.9 | 2 001 820 798 541 996 928 | 17.113846 | 2.967771 | ... | 13.178 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
361 944 444 | 22 44 20.64 | +54 10 08.3 | 2 002 409 582 707 022 592 | 17.910720 | 3.171944 | ... | 13.869 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
361 944 360 | 22 44 00.20 | +54 08 38.1 | 2 002 409 483 936 262 016 | 10.176037 | 0.637021 | 10.410 | 9.168 | 1.0 | 0.0024 | 0.857 | 0.007 |
66 194 421 | 22 43 13.83 | +53 53 46.0 | 2 002 397 698 545 886 592 | 16.360283 | 2.723582 | 17.692 | 12.595 | 0.8 | 0.2267 | 2.15 | 0.06 |
428 274 538 | 22 43 26.53 | +54 11 58.4 | 2 003 161 751 738 142 464 | 11.994698 | 0.997400 | 12.199 | 10.205 | 1.0 | 0.0517 | 0.579 | 0.002 |
64 838 038 | 22 34 51.43 | +54 43 20.3 | 2 003 377 530 902 056 064 | 17.930496 | 3.233290 | ... | 13.856 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
64 837 857 | 22 35 13.26 | +54 46 24.8 | 2 003 378 188 041 736 320 | 10.356592 | 0.619606 | 10.385 | 9.291 | 1.0 | 0.0051 | 1.67 | 0.01 |
343 437 865 | 22 46 13.51 | +53 59 10.6 | 2 002 718 377 980 766 336 | 17.758833 | 3.240006 | ... | 13.636 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
317 272 583 | 22 48 38.34 | +54 44 01.6 | 2 002 822 934 667 425 408 | 17.820822 | 3.080757 | ... | 13.742 | 0.7 | ... | ... | ... |
317 273 771 | 22 48 47.90 | +54 24 53.6 | 2 002 801 150 593 176 064 | 6.112235 | −0.092576 | 6.134 | 6.310 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
367 686 364 | 22 55 46.32 | +54 57 08.8 | 2 002 876 535 856 254 464 | 10.035475 | 0.606720 | 10.255 | 9.050 | 0.8 | 0.0023 | 4.37 | 0.08 |
67 055 292 | 22 50 14.85 | +53 33 28.1 | 2 002 471 537 620 861 056 | 16.707653 | 2.859225 | 17.560 | 12.819 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
64 647 628 | 22 34 50.16 | +54 10 04.2 | 2 003 297 923 690 672 512 | 15.213570 | 2.429640 | 16.294 | 11.692 | 1.0 | 0.0588 | 2.71 | 0.08 |
64 278 003 | 22 31 36.44 | +54 04 19.3 | 2 003 330 050 047 078 144 | 17.137224 | 3.127945 | ... | 13.098 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
64 077 901 | 22 31 17.98 | +55 02 40.7 | 2 006 435 105 245 732 480 | 12.769458 | 1.083085 | 12.805 | 10.839 | 1.0 | 0.0961 | 5.09 | 0.05 |
415 468 735 | 22 29 36.22 | +55 16 16.8 | 2 006 455 961 606 619 520 | 13.152347 | 1.193418 | 13.399 | 11.100 | 1.0 | 0.0291 | 3.99 | 0.03 |
64 561 694 | 22 33 59.64 | +55 42 22.4 | 2 006 489 462 352 825 344 | 15.635015 | 2.427858 | 16.505 | 12.067 | 0.6 | 0.1949 | 6.61 | 0.45 |
3 172 71 523 | 22 48 25.68 | +55 01 22.3 | 2 003 593 864 116 296 576 | 16.727818 | 2.879941 | 17.800 | 12.902 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
416 319 381 | 22 37 50.00 | +56 11 54.5 | 2 006 619 303 494 467 328 | 17.878110 | 3.284651 | ... | 13.790 | 0.6 | ... | ... | ... |
249 725 057 | 22 37 01.79 | +53 34 52.1 | 2 003 031 841 875 970 176 | 16.084180 | 2.522219 | 17.232 | 12.480 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
388 387 063 | 22 40 14.32 | +54 32 27.7 | 2 003 216 972 147 204 608 | 13.000790 | 1.158239 | 13.382 | 10.930 | 1.0 | 0.0534 | 3.19 | 0.03 |
64 646 728 | 22 33 35.99 | +53 58 10.4 | 2 003 271 397 972 097 024 | 13.680970 | 1.375657 | 13.911 | 11.279 | 1.0 | 0.0799 | 4.03 | 0.07 |
388 651 771 | 22 40 48.14 | +54 35 46.6 | 2 003 240 920 885 298 176 | 17.222970 | 2.861937 | 17.820 | 13.303 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
420 123 691 | 22 32 07.17 | +53 42 26.4 | 2 003 259 372 063 199 744 | 13.262769 | 1.266625 | 13.594 | 11.053 | 1.0 | 0.4418 | 13.43 | 0.20 |
388 693 014 | 22 41 34.98 | +54 35 30.0 | 2 003 228 517 019 770 240 | 17.371294 | 3.338816 | ... | 13.166 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
431 151 968 | 22 41 18.32 | +53 17 51.3 | 2 002 297 368 107 185 920 | 16.220058 | 2.902960 | 17.080 | 12.348 | 0.8 | 0.0787 | 0.910 | 0.015 |
66 343 379 | 22 44 17.19 | +53 35 24.7 | 2 002 328 875 988 217 216 | 16.020758 | 2.592554 | 17.219 | 12.356 | 1.0 | 0.0456 | 4.98 | 0.30 |
66 539 637 | 22 45 28.25 | +53 47 06.1 | 2 002 337 603 362 057 088 | 12.563967 | 1.053528 | 12.669 | 10.649 | 1.0 | 0.0483 | 5.83 | 0.05 |
2 046 168 414 | 22 45 28.58 | +53 47 07.9 | 2 002 337 603 353 142 016 | 17.408490 | 1.998825 | 18.077 | 10.649 | 0.6 | ... | ... | ... |
420 304 656 | 22 40 23.86 | +53 49 07.6 | 2 003 120 764 877 992 448 | 17.124058 | 2.955116 | 17.970 | 13.259 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
431 150 096 | 22 41 28.14 | +53 52 51.6 | 2 003 127 705 545 276 032 | 12.836430 | 1.113888 | 12.977 | 10.868 | 1.0 | 0.0697 | 5.24 | 0.06 |
2 046 389 820 | 22 41 06.01 | +53 59 05.8 | 2 003 132 344 098 378 496 | 14.223695 | ... | ... | ... | 0.7 | ... | ... | ... |
452 865 760 | 22 34 58.37 | +53 56 32.2 | 2 003 104 718 883 916 288 | 17.162186 | 3.024750 | 17.610 | 13.226 | 0.7 | ... | ... | ... |
427 060 252 | 22 39 36.76 | +53 52 53.3 | 2 003 136 501 637 932 672 | 15.955221 | 2.871970 | 16.900 | 12.065 | 0.8 | 0.0451 | 0.367 | 0.003 |
66 723 344 | 22 47 59.13 | +53 40 15.4 | 2 002 508 302 542 111 488 | 16.220280 | 2.973432 | 17.560 | 12.251 | 0.9 | 0.0292 | 0.311 | 0.002 |
67 224 655 | 22 52 17.23 | +53 53 39.2 | 2 002 528 402 990 066 944 | 15.586474 | 2.455151 | 16.671 | 11.949 | 0.9 | 0.1094 | 1.737 | 0.031 |
297 927 402 | 22 50 32.54 | +54 02 14.8 | 2 002 543 967 951 224 960 | 16.304932 | 2.683093 | 17.568 | 12.476 | 0.9 | 0.0515 | 1.503 | 0.023 |
343 771 372 | 22 46 34.54 | +54 46 05.2 | 2 003 554 006 818 945 280 | 9.578720 | 0.443725 | 9.703 | 8.837 | 0.9 | ... | ... | |
2 015 953 058 | 22 31 48.85 | +54 59 22.7 | 2 006 387 242 128 323 840 | 14.283266 | 1.744160 | 14.416 | 10.775 | 1.0 | 0.0965 | 5.19 | 0.04 |
64 077 487 | 22 30 51.98 | +54 55 50.1 | 2 006 385 764 659 269 760 | 16.194597 | 2.755547 | 17.110 | 12.358 | 0.6 | 0.0445 | 3.52 | 0.26 |
67 062 121 | 22 50 59.10 | +53 19 00.0 | 2 002 452 708 484 342 656 | 17.461884 | 2.946167 | 17.970 | 13.457 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
388 696 341 | 22 42 00.19 | +55 00 58.5 | 2 003 443 437 181 978 240 | 12.048476 | 0.941633 | 12.261 | 10.418 | 1.0 | 0.0838 | 3.92 | 0.02 |
343 867 253 | 22 47 52.68 | +55 33 18.5 | 2 003 669 180 664 786 944 | 15.195872 | 2.754218 | 15.750 | 11.370 | 0.8 | 0.0305 | 0.464 | 0.003 |
343 778 985 | 22 47 36.61 | +55 10 30.5 | 2 003 645 060 128 342 656 | 16.949617 | 2.980359 | 17.800 | 12.994 | 0.6 | ... | ... | ... |
431 153 083 | 22 41 11.77 | +52 56 27.8 | 2 002 274 106 564 094 848 | 13.922489 | 1.505455 | 14.256 | 11.335 | 1.0 | 0.0780 | 6.90 | 0.03 |
249 801 592 | 22 39 19.22 | +53 29 16.5 | 2 002 270 842 392 282 496 | 10.599697 | 0.758198 | 10.765 | 9.314 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
Rotation periods and variation amplitudes for the members of ASCC 123 derived in this work.
TIC . | RA . | DEC . | Sourcea . | Ga . | |$G_{\rm BP}-G_{\rm RP}^a$| . | Vb . | |$K_{\rm S}^c$| . | Probd . | Ampl . | Prot . | Err . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (J2000) . | (J2000) . | . | (mag) . | (mag) . | (mag) . | (mag) . | . | (mag) . | (d) . | |
467 546 937 | 22 29 27.77 | +53 16 35.4 | 2 001 745 344 554 471 296 | 16.062897 | 2.862838 | 17.233 | 12.225 | 1.0 | 0.0726 | 5.40 | 0.26 |
249 784 843 | 22 38 34.03 | +53 35 08.7 | 2 003 023 629 898 711 680 | 11.816078 | 0.914368 | 12.187 | 10.194 | 1.0 | 0.0836 | 0.562 | 0.002 |
428 062 248 | 22 36 24.68 | +53 15 06.1 | 2 003 011 500 910 639 744 | 15.950929 | 2.474563 | 16.461 | 12.419 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
452 862 919 | 22 34 35.38 | +53 05 22.0 | 2 002 983 291 564 863 872 | 17.446210 | 2.999275 | 17.970 | 13.511 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
66 541 342 | 22 46 07.28 | +53 30 19.7 | 2 002 130 929 538 238 336 | 15.743083 | 2.433725 | 16.906 | 12.153 | 1.0 | 0.0285 | 6.22 | 0.81 |
66 541 343 | 22 46 06.80 | +53 30 19.2 | 2 002 130 929 538 237 952 | 17.163408 | 3.006250 | ... | 13.104 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
298 019 363 | 22 51 06.72 | +54 28 54.2 | 2 002 757 891 681 122 944 | 17.132408 | 3.015108 | 17.150 | 13.098 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
427 062 959 | 22 39 36.92 | +53 07 03.0 | 2 002 201 225 257 443 072 | 13.165830 | 1.231491 | 13.503 | 11.045 | 1.0 | 0.0461 | 5.29 | 0.02 |
64 073 268 | 22 30 24.04 | +54 08 38.9 | 2 001 844 163 164 756 992 | 17.318691 | 3.011692 | 17.970 | 13.382 | 0.6 | ... | ... | ... |
197 755 998 | 22 28 01.49 | +53 47 39.9 | 2 001 820 798 541 996 928 | 17.113846 | 2.967771 | ... | 13.178 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
361 944 444 | 22 44 20.64 | +54 10 08.3 | 2 002 409 582 707 022 592 | 17.910720 | 3.171944 | ... | 13.869 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
361 944 360 | 22 44 00.20 | +54 08 38.1 | 2 002 409 483 936 262 016 | 10.176037 | 0.637021 | 10.410 | 9.168 | 1.0 | 0.0024 | 0.857 | 0.007 |
66 194 421 | 22 43 13.83 | +53 53 46.0 | 2 002 397 698 545 886 592 | 16.360283 | 2.723582 | 17.692 | 12.595 | 0.8 | 0.2267 | 2.15 | 0.06 |
428 274 538 | 22 43 26.53 | +54 11 58.4 | 2 003 161 751 738 142 464 | 11.994698 | 0.997400 | 12.199 | 10.205 | 1.0 | 0.0517 | 0.579 | 0.002 |
64 838 038 | 22 34 51.43 | +54 43 20.3 | 2 003 377 530 902 056 064 | 17.930496 | 3.233290 | ... | 13.856 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
64 837 857 | 22 35 13.26 | +54 46 24.8 | 2 003 378 188 041 736 320 | 10.356592 | 0.619606 | 10.385 | 9.291 | 1.0 | 0.0051 | 1.67 | 0.01 |
343 437 865 | 22 46 13.51 | +53 59 10.6 | 2 002 718 377 980 766 336 | 17.758833 | 3.240006 | ... | 13.636 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
317 272 583 | 22 48 38.34 | +54 44 01.6 | 2 002 822 934 667 425 408 | 17.820822 | 3.080757 | ... | 13.742 | 0.7 | ... | ... | ... |
317 273 771 | 22 48 47.90 | +54 24 53.6 | 2 002 801 150 593 176 064 | 6.112235 | −0.092576 | 6.134 | 6.310 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
367 686 364 | 22 55 46.32 | +54 57 08.8 | 2 002 876 535 856 254 464 | 10.035475 | 0.606720 | 10.255 | 9.050 | 0.8 | 0.0023 | 4.37 | 0.08 |
67 055 292 | 22 50 14.85 | +53 33 28.1 | 2 002 471 537 620 861 056 | 16.707653 | 2.859225 | 17.560 | 12.819 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
64 647 628 | 22 34 50.16 | +54 10 04.2 | 2 003 297 923 690 672 512 | 15.213570 | 2.429640 | 16.294 | 11.692 | 1.0 | 0.0588 | 2.71 | 0.08 |
64 278 003 | 22 31 36.44 | +54 04 19.3 | 2 003 330 050 047 078 144 | 17.137224 | 3.127945 | ... | 13.098 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
64 077 901 | 22 31 17.98 | +55 02 40.7 | 2 006 435 105 245 732 480 | 12.769458 | 1.083085 | 12.805 | 10.839 | 1.0 | 0.0961 | 5.09 | 0.05 |
415 468 735 | 22 29 36.22 | +55 16 16.8 | 2 006 455 961 606 619 520 | 13.152347 | 1.193418 | 13.399 | 11.100 | 1.0 | 0.0291 | 3.99 | 0.03 |
64 561 694 | 22 33 59.64 | +55 42 22.4 | 2 006 489 462 352 825 344 | 15.635015 | 2.427858 | 16.505 | 12.067 | 0.6 | 0.1949 | 6.61 | 0.45 |
3 172 71 523 | 22 48 25.68 | +55 01 22.3 | 2 003 593 864 116 296 576 | 16.727818 | 2.879941 | 17.800 | 12.902 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
416 319 381 | 22 37 50.00 | +56 11 54.5 | 2 006 619 303 494 467 328 | 17.878110 | 3.284651 | ... | 13.790 | 0.6 | ... | ... | ... |
249 725 057 | 22 37 01.79 | +53 34 52.1 | 2 003 031 841 875 970 176 | 16.084180 | 2.522219 | 17.232 | 12.480 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
388 387 063 | 22 40 14.32 | +54 32 27.7 | 2 003 216 972 147 204 608 | 13.000790 | 1.158239 | 13.382 | 10.930 | 1.0 | 0.0534 | 3.19 | 0.03 |
64 646 728 | 22 33 35.99 | +53 58 10.4 | 2 003 271 397 972 097 024 | 13.680970 | 1.375657 | 13.911 | 11.279 | 1.0 | 0.0799 | 4.03 | 0.07 |
388 651 771 | 22 40 48.14 | +54 35 46.6 | 2 003 240 920 885 298 176 | 17.222970 | 2.861937 | 17.820 | 13.303 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
420 123 691 | 22 32 07.17 | +53 42 26.4 | 2 003 259 372 063 199 744 | 13.262769 | 1.266625 | 13.594 | 11.053 | 1.0 | 0.4418 | 13.43 | 0.20 |
388 693 014 | 22 41 34.98 | +54 35 30.0 | 2 003 228 517 019 770 240 | 17.371294 | 3.338816 | ... | 13.166 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
431 151 968 | 22 41 18.32 | +53 17 51.3 | 2 002 297 368 107 185 920 | 16.220058 | 2.902960 | 17.080 | 12.348 | 0.8 | 0.0787 | 0.910 | 0.015 |
66 343 379 | 22 44 17.19 | +53 35 24.7 | 2 002 328 875 988 217 216 | 16.020758 | 2.592554 | 17.219 | 12.356 | 1.0 | 0.0456 | 4.98 | 0.30 |
66 539 637 | 22 45 28.25 | +53 47 06.1 | 2 002 337 603 362 057 088 | 12.563967 | 1.053528 | 12.669 | 10.649 | 1.0 | 0.0483 | 5.83 | 0.05 |
2 046 168 414 | 22 45 28.58 | +53 47 07.9 | 2 002 337 603 353 142 016 | 17.408490 | 1.998825 | 18.077 | 10.649 | 0.6 | ... | ... | ... |
420 304 656 | 22 40 23.86 | +53 49 07.6 | 2 003 120 764 877 992 448 | 17.124058 | 2.955116 | 17.970 | 13.259 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
431 150 096 | 22 41 28.14 | +53 52 51.6 | 2 003 127 705 545 276 032 | 12.836430 | 1.113888 | 12.977 | 10.868 | 1.0 | 0.0697 | 5.24 | 0.06 |
2 046 389 820 | 22 41 06.01 | +53 59 05.8 | 2 003 132 344 098 378 496 | 14.223695 | ... | ... | ... | 0.7 | ... | ... | ... |
452 865 760 | 22 34 58.37 | +53 56 32.2 | 2 003 104 718 883 916 288 | 17.162186 | 3.024750 | 17.610 | 13.226 | 0.7 | ... | ... | ... |
427 060 252 | 22 39 36.76 | +53 52 53.3 | 2 003 136 501 637 932 672 | 15.955221 | 2.871970 | 16.900 | 12.065 | 0.8 | 0.0451 | 0.367 | 0.003 |
66 723 344 | 22 47 59.13 | +53 40 15.4 | 2 002 508 302 542 111 488 | 16.220280 | 2.973432 | 17.560 | 12.251 | 0.9 | 0.0292 | 0.311 | 0.002 |
67 224 655 | 22 52 17.23 | +53 53 39.2 | 2 002 528 402 990 066 944 | 15.586474 | 2.455151 | 16.671 | 11.949 | 0.9 | 0.1094 | 1.737 | 0.031 |
297 927 402 | 22 50 32.54 | +54 02 14.8 | 2 002 543 967 951 224 960 | 16.304932 | 2.683093 | 17.568 | 12.476 | 0.9 | 0.0515 | 1.503 | 0.023 |
343 771 372 | 22 46 34.54 | +54 46 05.2 | 2 003 554 006 818 945 280 | 9.578720 | 0.443725 | 9.703 | 8.837 | 0.9 | ... | ... | |
2 015 953 058 | 22 31 48.85 | +54 59 22.7 | 2 006 387 242 128 323 840 | 14.283266 | 1.744160 | 14.416 | 10.775 | 1.0 | 0.0965 | 5.19 | 0.04 |
64 077 487 | 22 30 51.98 | +54 55 50.1 | 2 006 385 764 659 269 760 | 16.194597 | 2.755547 | 17.110 | 12.358 | 0.6 | 0.0445 | 3.52 | 0.26 |
67 062 121 | 22 50 59.10 | +53 19 00.0 | 2 002 452 708 484 342 656 | 17.461884 | 2.946167 | 17.970 | 13.457 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
388 696 341 | 22 42 00.19 | +55 00 58.5 | 2 003 443 437 181 978 240 | 12.048476 | 0.941633 | 12.261 | 10.418 | 1.0 | 0.0838 | 3.92 | 0.02 |
343 867 253 | 22 47 52.68 | +55 33 18.5 | 2 003 669 180 664 786 944 | 15.195872 | 2.754218 | 15.750 | 11.370 | 0.8 | 0.0305 | 0.464 | 0.003 |
343 778 985 | 22 47 36.61 | +55 10 30.5 | 2 003 645 060 128 342 656 | 16.949617 | 2.980359 | 17.800 | 12.994 | 0.6 | ... | ... | ... |
431 153 083 | 22 41 11.77 | +52 56 27.8 | 2 002 274 106 564 094 848 | 13.922489 | 1.505455 | 14.256 | 11.335 | 1.0 | 0.0780 | 6.90 | 0.03 |
249 801 592 | 22 39 19.22 | +53 29 16.5 | 2 002 270 842 392 282 496 | 10.599697 | 0.758198 | 10.765 | 9.314 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
TIC . | RA . | DEC . | Sourcea . | Ga . | |$G_{\rm BP}-G_{\rm RP}^a$| . | Vb . | |$K_{\rm S}^c$| . | Probd . | Ampl . | Prot . | Err . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (J2000) . | (J2000) . | . | (mag) . | (mag) . | (mag) . | (mag) . | . | (mag) . | (d) . | |
467 546 937 | 22 29 27.77 | +53 16 35.4 | 2 001 745 344 554 471 296 | 16.062897 | 2.862838 | 17.233 | 12.225 | 1.0 | 0.0726 | 5.40 | 0.26 |
249 784 843 | 22 38 34.03 | +53 35 08.7 | 2 003 023 629 898 711 680 | 11.816078 | 0.914368 | 12.187 | 10.194 | 1.0 | 0.0836 | 0.562 | 0.002 |
428 062 248 | 22 36 24.68 | +53 15 06.1 | 2 003 011 500 910 639 744 | 15.950929 | 2.474563 | 16.461 | 12.419 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
452 862 919 | 22 34 35.38 | +53 05 22.0 | 2 002 983 291 564 863 872 | 17.446210 | 2.999275 | 17.970 | 13.511 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
66 541 342 | 22 46 07.28 | +53 30 19.7 | 2 002 130 929 538 238 336 | 15.743083 | 2.433725 | 16.906 | 12.153 | 1.0 | 0.0285 | 6.22 | 0.81 |
66 541 343 | 22 46 06.80 | +53 30 19.2 | 2 002 130 929 538 237 952 | 17.163408 | 3.006250 | ... | 13.104 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
298 019 363 | 22 51 06.72 | +54 28 54.2 | 2 002 757 891 681 122 944 | 17.132408 | 3.015108 | 17.150 | 13.098 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
427 062 959 | 22 39 36.92 | +53 07 03.0 | 2 002 201 225 257 443 072 | 13.165830 | 1.231491 | 13.503 | 11.045 | 1.0 | 0.0461 | 5.29 | 0.02 |
64 073 268 | 22 30 24.04 | +54 08 38.9 | 2 001 844 163 164 756 992 | 17.318691 | 3.011692 | 17.970 | 13.382 | 0.6 | ... | ... | ... |
197 755 998 | 22 28 01.49 | +53 47 39.9 | 2 001 820 798 541 996 928 | 17.113846 | 2.967771 | ... | 13.178 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
361 944 444 | 22 44 20.64 | +54 10 08.3 | 2 002 409 582 707 022 592 | 17.910720 | 3.171944 | ... | 13.869 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
361 944 360 | 22 44 00.20 | +54 08 38.1 | 2 002 409 483 936 262 016 | 10.176037 | 0.637021 | 10.410 | 9.168 | 1.0 | 0.0024 | 0.857 | 0.007 |
66 194 421 | 22 43 13.83 | +53 53 46.0 | 2 002 397 698 545 886 592 | 16.360283 | 2.723582 | 17.692 | 12.595 | 0.8 | 0.2267 | 2.15 | 0.06 |
428 274 538 | 22 43 26.53 | +54 11 58.4 | 2 003 161 751 738 142 464 | 11.994698 | 0.997400 | 12.199 | 10.205 | 1.0 | 0.0517 | 0.579 | 0.002 |
64 838 038 | 22 34 51.43 | +54 43 20.3 | 2 003 377 530 902 056 064 | 17.930496 | 3.233290 | ... | 13.856 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
64 837 857 | 22 35 13.26 | +54 46 24.8 | 2 003 378 188 041 736 320 | 10.356592 | 0.619606 | 10.385 | 9.291 | 1.0 | 0.0051 | 1.67 | 0.01 |
343 437 865 | 22 46 13.51 | +53 59 10.6 | 2 002 718 377 980 766 336 | 17.758833 | 3.240006 | ... | 13.636 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
317 272 583 | 22 48 38.34 | +54 44 01.6 | 2 002 822 934 667 425 408 | 17.820822 | 3.080757 | ... | 13.742 | 0.7 | ... | ... | ... |
317 273 771 | 22 48 47.90 | +54 24 53.6 | 2 002 801 150 593 176 064 | 6.112235 | −0.092576 | 6.134 | 6.310 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
367 686 364 | 22 55 46.32 | +54 57 08.8 | 2 002 876 535 856 254 464 | 10.035475 | 0.606720 | 10.255 | 9.050 | 0.8 | 0.0023 | 4.37 | 0.08 |
67 055 292 | 22 50 14.85 | +53 33 28.1 | 2 002 471 537 620 861 056 | 16.707653 | 2.859225 | 17.560 | 12.819 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
64 647 628 | 22 34 50.16 | +54 10 04.2 | 2 003 297 923 690 672 512 | 15.213570 | 2.429640 | 16.294 | 11.692 | 1.0 | 0.0588 | 2.71 | 0.08 |
64 278 003 | 22 31 36.44 | +54 04 19.3 | 2 003 330 050 047 078 144 | 17.137224 | 3.127945 | ... | 13.098 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
64 077 901 | 22 31 17.98 | +55 02 40.7 | 2 006 435 105 245 732 480 | 12.769458 | 1.083085 | 12.805 | 10.839 | 1.0 | 0.0961 | 5.09 | 0.05 |
415 468 735 | 22 29 36.22 | +55 16 16.8 | 2 006 455 961 606 619 520 | 13.152347 | 1.193418 | 13.399 | 11.100 | 1.0 | 0.0291 | 3.99 | 0.03 |
64 561 694 | 22 33 59.64 | +55 42 22.4 | 2 006 489 462 352 825 344 | 15.635015 | 2.427858 | 16.505 | 12.067 | 0.6 | 0.1949 | 6.61 | 0.45 |
3 172 71 523 | 22 48 25.68 | +55 01 22.3 | 2 003 593 864 116 296 576 | 16.727818 | 2.879941 | 17.800 | 12.902 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
416 319 381 | 22 37 50.00 | +56 11 54.5 | 2 006 619 303 494 467 328 | 17.878110 | 3.284651 | ... | 13.790 | 0.6 | ... | ... | ... |
249 725 057 | 22 37 01.79 | +53 34 52.1 | 2 003 031 841 875 970 176 | 16.084180 | 2.522219 | 17.232 | 12.480 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
388 387 063 | 22 40 14.32 | +54 32 27.7 | 2 003 216 972 147 204 608 | 13.000790 | 1.158239 | 13.382 | 10.930 | 1.0 | 0.0534 | 3.19 | 0.03 |
64 646 728 | 22 33 35.99 | +53 58 10.4 | 2 003 271 397 972 097 024 | 13.680970 | 1.375657 | 13.911 | 11.279 | 1.0 | 0.0799 | 4.03 | 0.07 |
388 651 771 | 22 40 48.14 | +54 35 46.6 | 2 003 240 920 885 298 176 | 17.222970 | 2.861937 | 17.820 | 13.303 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
420 123 691 | 22 32 07.17 | +53 42 26.4 | 2 003 259 372 063 199 744 | 13.262769 | 1.266625 | 13.594 | 11.053 | 1.0 | 0.4418 | 13.43 | 0.20 |
388 693 014 | 22 41 34.98 | +54 35 30.0 | 2 003 228 517 019 770 240 | 17.371294 | 3.338816 | ... | 13.166 | 0.9 | ... | ... | ... |
431 151 968 | 22 41 18.32 | +53 17 51.3 | 2 002 297 368 107 185 920 | 16.220058 | 2.902960 | 17.080 | 12.348 | 0.8 | 0.0787 | 0.910 | 0.015 |
66 343 379 | 22 44 17.19 | +53 35 24.7 | 2 002 328 875 988 217 216 | 16.020758 | 2.592554 | 17.219 | 12.356 | 1.0 | 0.0456 | 4.98 | 0.30 |
66 539 637 | 22 45 28.25 | +53 47 06.1 | 2 002 337 603 362 057 088 | 12.563967 | 1.053528 | 12.669 | 10.649 | 1.0 | 0.0483 | 5.83 | 0.05 |
2 046 168 414 | 22 45 28.58 | +53 47 07.9 | 2 002 337 603 353 142 016 | 17.408490 | 1.998825 | 18.077 | 10.649 | 0.6 | ... | ... | ... |
420 304 656 | 22 40 23.86 | +53 49 07.6 | 2 003 120 764 877 992 448 | 17.124058 | 2.955116 | 17.970 | 13.259 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
431 150 096 | 22 41 28.14 | +53 52 51.6 | 2 003 127 705 545 276 032 | 12.836430 | 1.113888 | 12.977 | 10.868 | 1.0 | 0.0697 | 5.24 | 0.06 |
2 046 389 820 | 22 41 06.01 | +53 59 05.8 | 2 003 132 344 098 378 496 | 14.223695 | ... | ... | ... | 0.7 | ... | ... | ... |
452 865 760 | 22 34 58.37 | +53 56 32.2 | 2 003 104 718 883 916 288 | 17.162186 | 3.024750 | 17.610 | 13.226 | 0.7 | ... | ... | ... |
427 060 252 | 22 39 36.76 | +53 52 53.3 | 2 003 136 501 637 932 672 | 15.955221 | 2.871970 | 16.900 | 12.065 | 0.8 | 0.0451 | 0.367 | 0.003 |
66 723 344 | 22 47 59.13 | +53 40 15.4 | 2 002 508 302 542 111 488 | 16.220280 | 2.973432 | 17.560 | 12.251 | 0.9 | 0.0292 | 0.311 | 0.002 |
67 224 655 | 22 52 17.23 | +53 53 39.2 | 2 002 528 402 990 066 944 | 15.586474 | 2.455151 | 16.671 | 11.949 | 0.9 | 0.1094 | 1.737 | 0.031 |
297 927 402 | 22 50 32.54 | +54 02 14.8 | 2 002 543 967 951 224 960 | 16.304932 | 2.683093 | 17.568 | 12.476 | 0.9 | 0.0515 | 1.503 | 0.023 |
343 771 372 | 22 46 34.54 | +54 46 05.2 | 2 003 554 006 818 945 280 | 9.578720 | 0.443725 | 9.703 | 8.837 | 0.9 | ... | ... | |
2 015 953 058 | 22 31 48.85 | +54 59 22.7 | 2 006 387 242 128 323 840 | 14.283266 | 1.744160 | 14.416 | 10.775 | 1.0 | 0.0965 | 5.19 | 0.04 |
64 077 487 | 22 30 51.98 | +54 55 50.1 | 2 006 385 764 659 269 760 | 16.194597 | 2.755547 | 17.110 | 12.358 | 0.6 | 0.0445 | 3.52 | 0.26 |
67 062 121 | 22 50 59.10 | +53 19 00.0 | 2 002 452 708 484 342 656 | 17.461884 | 2.946167 | 17.970 | 13.457 | 0.8 | ... | ... | ... |
388 696 341 | 22 42 00.19 | +55 00 58.5 | 2 003 443 437 181 978 240 | 12.048476 | 0.941633 | 12.261 | 10.418 | 1.0 | 0.0838 | 3.92 | 0.02 |
343 867 253 | 22 47 52.68 | +55 33 18.5 | 2 003 669 180 664 786 944 | 15.195872 | 2.754218 | 15.750 | 11.370 | 0.8 | 0.0305 | 0.464 | 0.003 |
343 778 985 | 22 47 36.61 | +55 10 30.5 | 2 003 645 060 128 342 656 | 16.949617 | 2.980359 | 17.800 | 12.994 | 0.6 | ... | ... | ... |
431 153 083 | 22 41 11.77 | +52 56 27.8 | 2 002 274 106 564 094 848 | 13.922489 | 1.505455 | 14.256 | 11.335 | 1.0 | 0.0780 | 6.90 | 0.03 |
249 801 592 | 22 39 19.22 | +53 29 16.5 | 2 002 270 842 392 282 496 | 10.599697 | 0.758198 | 10.765 | 9.314 | 1.0 | ... | ... | ... |
We note that the cleaned periodograms display for all the stars but S 39, a clear power peak (marked with a red vertical line in each plot) without secondary peaks of comparable amplitude. This period thus represents the rotational one. Even the hottest star, S 554, displays a significant rotational modulation, although with a very low amplitude of only ∼0.007 mag, which is clearly shown by the phased light curve displayed in the right inset panel of Fig. B4. As mentioned above, the only doubtful case is S 39, for which the highest power in the periodogram is found at a period 4.86 d, which is clearly inconsistent with the rapid rotation of the star indicated by the high value of the projected rotation velocity, vsin i ≃ 49 km s−1. However, the periodogram displays other peaks at about 7 d (which is still more inconsistent with the vsin i) and at 1.67 d (marked with a blue vertical line in the left inset panel of Fig. B1); we consider the last as a possible Prot value and list it in Table 1 with a colon.
3.2 Chromospheric emission
The level of chromospheric activity can be evaluated from the emission in the core of the Hα and Ca ii H and K lines (see e.g. Frasca & Catalano 1994; Frasca et al. 2010, 2019; and references therein). To this end, we subtracted photospheric templates from the observed spectra of the targets, to remove the underlying photospheric absorption lines so as to leave as residual the chromospheric emission in the cores of Hα and Ca ii lines. The photospheric templates are made with synthetic BT-Settl spectra (Allard, Homeier & Freytag 2012) for Ca ii lines, and spectra of non-active stars for the Hα; indeed the latter are better reproducing the core of the Hα line in absence of a significant chromospheric contribution. Since the signal-to-noise ratio in the Ca ii H & K region is quite low, ranging from 3 (for the coolest members) to 38 (for the hottest one), we have degraded the original resolution (R = 115 000) of the HARPS-N spectra and the synthetic spectra to R = 42 000, which is the same of the ELODIE templates used for the determination of the atmospheric parameters and the subtraction of the photospheric Hα template (Paper I). Furthermore, the photospheric templates have been aligned in wavelength with the target spectra by means of the cross-correlation function and have been rotationally broadened by the convolution with a rotational profile with the vsin i of the target star (Table 1).
The observed spectra (black lines) and the photospheric templates (red lines) are displayed in Fig. 2 for the Ca ii H & K region. Fig. B8 shows the Hα profiles of the targets (black dots) overlaid to the photspheric templates (red lines) and the difference of the two (blue lines). The excess Hα equivalent width (EW), WHα, has been obtained by integrating the residual Hα emission profile, which is highlighted by the green hatched areas in the difference spectra in each box of Fig. B8. Analogously, for each target, the difference between observed and template spectrum in the Ca ii region leaves emission excesses in the cores of the H and K lines, which have been integrated obtaining the EWs, WCaII-H and WCaII-K. It is worth noticing that the hottest star in our sample, S 554 (Teff = 6871 K), does not show any filling in the Hα core and only a tiny filling in the cores of the Ca ii lines (upper right panels in Figs B8 and 2). For S 39 (Teff = 6667 K), a small residual emission is detected in the core of the Hα and also in the Ca ii lines. However, unlike the other stars of lower temperature, no reversal in emission emerges in the cores of the H and K lines for these two F4-type stars. This is in line with what is expected on the basis of the reduced chromospheric activity in these stars with shallow convective envelopes and the difficulty of detecting low chromospheric emission against a large continuum flux.

HARPS-N spectra of the investigated stars in the Ca ii H&K region. In each box, the non-active template (red line) is overlaid with the observed spectra (thick black line). The ID of the source is marked in the lower right corner of each box. The two uppermost panels display the hottest (F4V-type) stars in our sample for which no clear emission in the H&K line cores is visible.
As a more effective indicator of chromospheric activity, we computed the surface flux in each of the chromospheric lines, Fline. For the Ca ii K line, this reads as
where F3933 is the flux at the continuum at the centre of the Ca ii K line per unit stellar surface area, which is evaluated from the BT-Settl spectra (Allard et al. 2012) at the stellar temperature and surface gravity of the target. We evaluated the flux error by taking into account the error of WCaII-K and the uncertainty in the continuum flux at the line centre, F3933, which is estimated considering the errors of Teff and log g.
We computed surface fluxes for the other chromospheric diagnostics in the same way as for the Ca ii K line. The EWs and fluxes are reported in Table 3.
ID . | Teff . | WHα . | Err . | FHα . | Err . | WCaII-K . | Err . | WCaII-H . | Err . | FCaII-K . | Err . | FCaII-H . | Err . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (K) . | (mÅ) . | (erg cm−2 s−1) . | (mÅ) . | (mÅ) . | (erg cm−2 s−1) . | (erg cm−2 s−1) . | ||||||
39 | 6667 | 73 | 13 | 9.01e + 05 | 1.69e + 05 | 189 | 65 | 145 | 55 | 3.42e + 06 | 1.23e + 06 | 2.62e + 06 | 1.05e + 06 |
214 | 5804 | 291 | 21 | 2.17e + 06 | 1.99e + 05 | 853 | 122 | 780 | 127 | 5.03e + 06 | 1.04e + 06 | 4.60e + 06 | 1.02e + 06 |
435 | 5758 | 144 | 18 | 1.04e + 06 | 1.40e + 05 | 492 | 74 | 438 | 80 | 2.73e + 06 | 5.17e + 05 | 2.43e + 06 | 5.27e + 05 |
517 | 5784 | 591 | 33 | 4.34e + 06 | 3.31e + 05 | 1082 | 211 | 985 | 232 | 6.18e + 06 | 1.40e + 06 | 5.63e + 06 | 1.48e + 06 |
554 | 6871 | ... | ... | ... | ... | 64 | 22 | 64 | 20 | 1.45e + 06 | 5.32e + 05 | 1.43e + 06 | 4.83e + 05 |
F1 | 5263 | 196 | 22 | 9.93e + 05 | 1.33e + 05 | 519 | 155 | 443 | 174 | 1.34e + 06 | 4.57e + 05 | 1.15e + 06 | 4.87e + 05 |
F2 | 5237 | 396 | 30 | 1.96e + 06 | 1.93e + 05 | 786 | 194 | 608 | 250 | 1.94e + 06 | 5.54e + 05 | 1.50e + 06 | 6.55e + 05 |
ID . | Teff . | WHα . | Err . | FHα . | Err . | WCaII-K . | Err . | WCaII-H . | Err . | FCaII-K . | Err . | FCaII-H . | Err . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (K) . | (mÅ) . | (erg cm−2 s−1) . | (mÅ) . | (mÅ) . | (erg cm−2 s−1) . | (erg cm−2 s−1) . | ||||||
39 | 6667 | 73 | 13 | 9.01e + 05 | 1.69e + 05 | 189 | 65 | 145 | 55 | 3.42e + 06 | 1.23e + 06 | 2.62e + 06 | 1.05e + 06 |
214 | 5804 | 291 | 21 | 2.17e + 06 | 1.99e + 05 | 853 | 122 | 780 | 127 | 5.03e + 06 | 1.04e + 06 | 4.60e + 06 | 1.02e + 06 |
435 | 5758 | 144 | 18 | 1.04e + 06 | 1.40e + 05 | 492 | 74 | 438 | 80 | 2.73e + 06 | 5.17e + 05 | 2.43e + 06 | 5.27e + 05 |
517 | 5784 | 591 | 33 | 4.34e + 06 | 3.31e + 05 | 1082 | 211 | 985 | 232 | 6.18e + 06 | 1.40e + 06 | 5.63e + 06 | 1.48e + 06 |
554 | 6871 | ... | ... | ... | ... | 64 | 22 | 64 | 20 | 1.45e + 06 | 5.32e + 05 | 1.43e + 06 | 4.83e + 05 |
F1 | 5263 | 196 | 22 | 9.93e + 05 | 1.33e + 05 | 519 | 155 | 443 | 174 | 1.34e + 06 | 4.57e + 05 | 1.15e + 06 | 4.87e + 05 |
F2 | 5237 | 396 | 30 | 1.96e + 06 | 1.93e + 05 | 786 | 194 | 608 | 250 | 1.94e + 06 | 5.54e + 05 | 1.50e + 06 | 6.55e + 05 |
ID . | Teff . | WHα . | Err . | FHα . | Err . | WCaII-K . | Err . | WCaII-H . | Err . | FCaII-K . | Err . | FCaII-H . | Err . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (K) . | (mÅ) . | (erg cm−2 s−1) . | (mÅ) . | (mÅ) . | (erg cm−2 s−1) . | (erg cm−2 s−1) . | ||||||
39 | 6667 | 73 | 13 | 9.01e + 05 | 1.69e + 05 | 189 | 65 | 145 | 55 | 3.42e + 06 | 1.23e + 06 | 2.62e + 06 | 1.05e + 06 |
214 | 5804 | 291 | 21 | 2.17e + 06 | 1.99e + 05 | 853 | 122 | 780 | 127 | 5.03e + 06 | 1.04e + 06 | 4.60e + 06 | 1.02e + 06 |
435 | 5758 | 144 | 18 | 1.04e + 06 | 1.40e + 05 | 492 | 74 | 438 | 80 | 2.73e + 06 | 5.17e + 05 | 2.43e + 06 | 5.27e + 05 |
517 | 5784 | 591 | 33 | 4.34e + 06 | 3.31e + 05 | 1082 | 211 | 985 | 232 | 6.18e + 06 | 1.40e + 06 | 5.63e + 06 | 1.48e + 06 |
554 | 6871 | ... | ... | ... | ... | 64 | 22 | 64 | 20 | 1.45e + 06 | 5.32e + 05 | 1.43e + 06 | 4.83e + 05 |
F1 | 5263 | 196 | 22 | 9.93e + 05 | 1.33e + 05 | 519 | 155 | 443 | 174 | 1.34e + 06 | 4.57e + 05 | 1.15e + 06 | 4.87e + 05 |
F2 | 5237 | 396 | 30 | 1.96e + 06 | 1.93e + 05 | 786 | 194 | 608 | 250 | 1.94e + 06 | 5.54e + 05 | 1.50e + 06 | 6.55e + 05 |
ID . | Teff . | WHα . | Err . | FHα . | Err . | WCaII-K . | Err . | WCaII-H . | Err . | FCaII-K . | Err . | FCaII-H . | Err . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (K) . | (mÅ) . | (erg cm−2 s−1) . | (mÅ) . | (mÅ) . | (erg cm−2 s−1) . | (erg cm−2 s−1) . | ||||||
39 | 6667 | 73 | 13 | 9.01e + 05 | 1.69e + 05 | 189 | 65 | 145 | 55 | 3.42e + 06 | 1.23e + 06 | 2.62e + 06 | 1.05e + 06 |
214 | 5804 | 291 | 21 | 2.17e + 06 | 1.99e + 05 | 853 | 122 | 780 | 127 | 5.03e + 06 | 1.04e + 06 | 4.60e + 06 | 1.02e + 06 |
435 | 5758 | 144 | 18 | 1.04e + 06 | 1.40e + 05 | 492 | 74 | 438 | 80 | 2.73e + 06 | 5.17e + 05 | 2.43e + 06 | 5.27e + 05 |
517 | 5784 | 591 | 33 | 4.34e + 06 | 3.31e + 05 | 1082 | 211 | 985 | 232 | 6.18e + 06 | 1.40e + 06 | 5.63e + 06 | 1.48e + 06 |
554 | 6871 | ... | ... | ... | ... | 64 | 22 | 64 | 20 | 1.45e + 06 | 5.32e + 05 | 1.43e + 06 | 4.83e + 05 |
F1 | 5263 | 196 | 22 | 9.93e + 05 | 1.33e + 05 | 519 | 155 | 443 | 174 | 1.34e + 06 | 4.57e + 05 | 1.15e + 06 | 4.87e + 05 |
F2 | 5237 | 396 | 30 | 1.96e + 06 | 1.93e + 05 | 786 | 194 | 608 | 250 | 1.94e + 06 | 5.54e + 05 | 1.50e + 06 | 6.55e + 05 |
4 DISCUSSION
4.1 Rotational periods
The distribution of rotation periods as a function of the stellar mass is a very useful tool for characterizing the evolutionary stage of a cluster (e.g. Barnes 2003; and references therein). To this aim, we plot in Fig. 3(a) the periods listed in Table 2 versus the colour index (GBP − GRP)0, which has been dereddened using the value AV = 0.13 mag derived in Paper I and the extinction relations in Wang & Chen (2019). In the same plot we also show the periods derived by Rebull et al. (2016) for a sample of Pleiades members observed with Kepler–K2. To compare our period distribution with previous works devoted to other clusters, we also use the colour index (V − Ks)0 in Fig. 3(b). Despite the small data sample, the rotation periods for the candidate members of ASCC 123 roughly follow the distribution of the Pleiades, with the presence of both fast and slow rotators for G-type stars. We note that, among the three solar-like stars, S 214 and S 517 lie in the fast-rotating C sequence (according to the notation of Barnes 2003), while S 435 falls on the I sequence of the Pleiades, for which the period increases steadily with the colour index up to (GBP − GRP)0 ≈ 1.5 mag, and then decreases reaching the C sequence at (GBP − GRP)0 ≈ 3 mag. We do not find fast rotators (in the lower C sequence) with colour 1 < (GBP − GRP)0 < 2.5, i.e. approximately in the spectral-type range G3–M3. However, the presence of the two fast-rotating solar-type stars strongly supports a young age for the cluster, because the C sequence of older clusters like NGC 3532 (age ∼300 Myr) displaces towards cooler objects (e.g. Barnes 2003; Fritzewski et al. 2021) and practically disappears for the still older Hyades or Praesepe clusters (Barnes 2003; Rebull et al. 2022), i.e. at age ≈ 600 Myr. Indeed, the hottest stars in NGC 3532 with Prot < 1 d have a (V − Ks)0 ≃ 3 (Fritzewski et al. 2021). Another cluster in the age range between the Pleiades and the Hyades is M 48. For this cluster, with an age of about 450 Myr, Barnes et al. (2015) found no G- or early K-type fast-rotating stars. A younger cluster showing a clear C sequence reaching the G-type stars is M 34 (age ∼ 250 Myr; Ianna & Schlemmer 1993). Therefore, the gyrochronological age of ASCC 123 should not be greater than 250–300 Myr.3

(a) Rotation periods versus the dereddened colour index (GBP − GRP)0 for the candidate members of the cluster ASCC 123 selected by Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018) (red circles). Small black dots denote the periods derived for a sample of Pleiades members by Rebull et al. (2016) during the Kepler–K2 campaign. The ID of the three solar-like stars is also marked. Rotational isochrones from Spada & Lanzafame (2020) at ages of 100, 200, and 500 Myr are overplotted with continuous, dashed, and dash–dotted lines, respectively. (b) Rotation periods versus (V − Ks)0.
As a further check, we have also plotted in Fig. 3, rotational isochrones calculated for slow-rotator sequences by Spada & Lanzafame (2020) and expressed as a function of stellar mass or B − V in their Table A1. For this purpose, we have converted the B − V colour index into V − KS and GBP − GRP according to the calibrations of Mamajek.4 As apparent, the I sequences of both ASCC 123 and the Pleiades agree with the theoretical isochrone of Spada & Lanzafame (2020) with the smallest age in their model (τ = 100 Myr).
On the other hand, a much younger age seems to be ruled out by the clear gap between fast and slow rotators observed for ASCC 123. Indeed, this gap is not visible in very young (≈16 Myr) stellar populations, such as the Upper Centaurus-Lupus and Lower Centaurus-Crux (Rebull et al. 2022). The most discrepant object, with respect to the Pleiades diagram, is TIC 420123691, for which we measure a period of 13.4 d that places it much higher than the Pleiades I sequence. This object could be a non-member or a close binary.
4.2 Variation amplitudes
Another proxy for the magnetic activity level is the amplitude of photometric variations induced by starspots (see e.g. Messina 2021; See et al. 2021). The variation amplitudes of our sources, which are reported in Table 2, were measured on their TESS light curves, converting fluxes into magnitudes and rejecting 5σ outliers. We excluded long-term linear trends by taking suitable data chunks and took the largest variation amplitude. We show the amplitude of variation as a function of the (GBP − GRP)0 colour index in Fig. 4(a), where the same data for the Pleiades (Rebull et al. 2016) are also plotted for comparison. TIC 420123691, with an amplitude of 0.44 mag, is the most discrepant object also in this diagram. A spectroscopic follow-up would be very useful to better clarify its nature. A similar plot with the (V − Ks)0 colour in the x-axis is shown in Fig. 4(b), where we overlay the amplitudes at the 80th percentile of three clusters (Upper Sco, Pleiades, and Praesepe) in bins of the colour index as derived by Messina (2021, see his table 1). For the Pleiades, we plot the 80th percentile amplitudes of both the fast-rotating (0.1 < Prot < 1.0 d) and slow-rotating stars (3 < Prot < 9 d), while for the Praesepe, we do not have the sequence of fast rotators in this colour range, so we plot only the amplitude of slow rotators (Prot > 9 d). Indeed, for the Praesepe stars with Prot > 9 d, Messina (2021) reports the 80th percentile data for all the bins of (V − Ks)0 in the range 1–6 mag. However, we note that the amplitudes of the Praesepe stars with 3 < Prot < 9 d for the three (V − Ks)0 bins for which they could be determined are basically the same as those in the longest period range. The comparison of the variation amplitudes with the loci of the three clusters further indicates that ASCC 123 is clearly older than Upper Sco (age ≈ 10 Myr; Feiden 2016) and younger than Praesepe, suggesting an age similar to that of the Pleiades.

(a) Variation amplitudes versus the dereddened colour index (GBP − GRP)0 for the candidate members of the cluster ASCC 123 (red circles) and for the sample of Pleiades members (small black dots) studied by Rebull et al. (2016). (b) Amplitudes as a function of the (V − Ks)0 colour index. The meaning of the symbols is as in panel (a). The hatched rectangles represent the amplitudes at the 80th percentile for the clusters and the period ranges indicated in the legend according to Messina (2021).
One of the main ingredients of dynamo mechanisms generating magnetic fields and operating in stellar interiors is the rotation rate. Therefore, a correlation of magnetic field intensity (or proxies of magnetic field) and the rotation period is expected. Indeed, the correlation with Prot has been widely documented in the literature for several diagnostics of magnetic activity at chromospheric and coronal levels (see e.g. Pizzolato et al. 2003; Cardini & Cassatella 2007; Reiners, Schüssler & Passegger 2014; Frasca et al. 2016). As regards the photospheric activity, traced, e.g. by the variation amplitude, correlation with Prot has been found by Reinhold & Hekker (2020), who subdivided their very large sample of stars with periods and amplitudes detected from Kepler–K2 light curves in several subsamples with 200 K temperature bins. They found a general decrease of variability with increasing rotation period for all temperature bins, although the data show large scatter. We plot the variation amplitude as a function of Prot in Fig. 5(a). No clear decrease of the amplitude with increasing Prot is visible either for ASCC 123 or the Pleiades. This result is supported by the low Spearman’s correlation coefficient, both for the Pleiades (ρ ≃ −0.02) and ASCC 123 (ρ ≃ +0.12, even excluding the discrepant star with Prot = 13.4 d). However, we note that our data include stars with very different Teff values (and consequently different internal structure). As pointed out in several works, including some of those mentioned above, a better variable related to the dynamo action is the Rossby number, RO = Prot/τc, defined as the ratio of the rotation period and the convective turnover time τc. The latter is not a directly measurable variable, but can be derived from theoretical models for MS stars or from calibrations as a function of temperature or colour indices. In our case, we have used the empirical relation proposed by Wright et al. (2011, equation 10) as a function of V − KS. Some correlation, albeit with large scatter, is found between amplitude and RO (Fig. 5b), with Spearman’s coefficients ρ ≃ −0.16 and −0.13 for ASCC 123 and the Pleiades, respectively.

(a) Variation amplitudes versus the rotation period for the candidate members of the cluster ASCC 123 (red circles). Small black dots denote the amplitudes for the Pleiades members by Rebull et al. (2016). The green dots and error bars show the median variability range for the Pleiades for period bins of 1 d and the standard deviation therein. (b) Variation amplitudes versus the Rossby number RO = Prot/τc.
4.3 Stellar spin orientation
For the stars studied in Paper I, for which we measured accurate values of vsin i, and thanks to the rotational periods, Prot, and stellar radii, R*, which are reported in Table 1, we can derive the inclination of the rotation axis as
We found a value of sin i < 1 for all the stars, with the exception of S 39. For it, the peak at 1.67 d is marginally consistent (considering the errors) with the value of vsin i|$\simeq \,$| 49 km s−1 measured in Paper I, implying an inclination close to 90°, but the TESS light curve phased with this period does not show any clear rotational modulation. We therefore consider this period an uncertain value. However, if the spin axis is nearly parallel to the orbital axis of the presumed transiting object, the inclination of the rotation axis should be very close to 90°, making 1.67 d a possible rotation period for this star. The values of inclination of the rotation axis for the seven stars with HARPS-N spectra are also listed in Table 1.
The statistical sample is too small to study the distribution of the inclinations of the stellar spins and investigate their degree of alignment, as pointed out, e.g. by Corsaro et al. (2017), whose simulations show that a sample 2–3 times larger is required for obtaining a high significance of any eventual spin alignment. However, we wanted to compare the values of i that we find for the seven stars in Table 1 with those expected from a random 3D distribution of the rotation axes, in a similar way to what Corsaro et al. (2017) did for giant stars in the old open clusters NGC 6791 and NGC 6819. In their case, for both clusters the i distribution was concentrated towards low values, i.e. it was very different from that expected from a random distribution of the rotation axes (see fig. 1 in their paper), suggesting a significant alignment of the stellar spins. In our case (Fig. 6), the values of inclination are all greater than 50 degrees and are compatible with a random distribution or, in any case, they do not allow us to draw firm conclusions. High- or medium-resolution spectra for a significant number of cluster members, as expected from future multi-object surveys like WEAVE (Jin et al. 2023), are needed to better investigate this aspect. We note that Healy, McCullough & Schlaufman (2021) find that isotropic spins or moderate alignment are both consistent with the sin i values they derived for members of Pleiades and Praesepe clusters. In a recent work, Healy et al. (2023) found eight out of the 10 investigated clusters having spin–axis orientations consistent with isotropy and two clusters whose distributions can be better described by an aligned fraction of stars combined with an isotropic distribution. However, they suggest this result can be influenced by systematic errors on i and by the poor statistics.

Distribution of the inclination of the rotation axis for the seven stars in Table 1 (light-blue histogram). The red histogram shows the expected distribution for a three-dimensional (3D) uniform orientation of the spin vectors.
4.4 Chromospheric activity
Correlations between diagnostics of chromospheric activity and Prot, or the Rossby number, have often been reported in the literature (e.g. Douglas et al. 2014; Frasca et al. 2016; Han et al. 2023; and references therein). For rapidly rotating stars, a saturated regime, in which the activity level is constant with Prot, is clearly shown by the coronal X-ray emission (e.g. Pizzolato et al. 2003; Wright et al. 2011) but it is also seen at chromospheric level (e.g. Douglas et al. 2014; Newton et al. 2017). In particular, Douglas et al. (2014) found that Hα activity is saturated for RO < 0.11 for members of Hyades and Praesepe, while Newton et al. (2017) found saturation in their sample of nearby field M-type stars for RO < 0.2.
Despite the small number of stars with measured Hα and Ca ii fluxes, we wanted to see if there is any hint of a correlation with rotation in our data. As an example, we show FCaII-K as a function of RO in Fig. 7, which clearly shows the decline of flux with increasing RO. The only discrepant point is that of the hottest star, S 554. Similar results are also obtained with Ca ii H and Hα as evidenced by the Pearson’s correlation coefficients ρ = −0.65, −0.71, and −0.74, for the Hα, Ca ii K, and H lines, respectively. Apart from the two F4V sources (S 39 and S 554), only the two ultrafast G-type stars (S 214 and S 517) should have a saturated chromospheric emission, on the basis of their Rossby number. These are the only stars in Table 1 for which a value of X-ray flux is reported in the literature. The values of FX = 3.36 × 10−13 and 3.65 × 10−13 erg cm−2 s−1 reported by Freund et al. (2022) translate, with the Gaia parallaxes and our values of Teff and R* (Table 1), into log (LX/Lbol) values of −3.36 and −3.31 for S 214 and S 517, respectively. These values are close to the saturation level of −3.13 reported by Wright et al. (2011).

Line flux in the Ca ii K line as a function of the Rossby number.
To further investigate the behaviour of the magnetic activity at chromospheric level, we have compared the different diagnostics by means of flux–flux diagrams. These diagrams are shown, in a logarithm scale, in Fig. 8 along with the power–law relationships found by Martínez-Arnáiz et al. (2011) from their large sample of active FGKM stars. We note that all the members lie, within the error bars, over the flux–flux relation for the Ca ii K versus Ca ii H, while the Hα fluxes, which are displayed versus Ca ii K ones in the right-hand panel of Fig. 8, are more scattered. This is consistent with the results of Martínez-Arnáiz et al. (2011), who found a larger scatter in the Hα–Ca ii flux diagrams compared to diagrams based on different Ca ii lines. Furthermore, they distinguished two different regimes in the Hα–Ca ii flux diagrams, with the very active late-K and M-type stars significantly deviating from the main behaviour and lying in an upper branch. They argued that these are stars with a saturated X-ray flux. The stars in our sample are all earlier than those in the upper branch of the flux–flux diagrams of Martínez-Arnáiz et al. (2011) and only the ultrafast G-type stars S 214 and S 527 display an activity level close to saturation. The remaining GK-type stars should not be saturated, on the basis of their Rossby number and the above mentioned correlations. However, we note that the two K-type stars, F1 and F2, lie right on the average power–law relation (red dotted line in Fig. 8), while the remaining stars are placed systematically lower, but are closer to the lower branch fit (blue dashed line in Fig. 8). The latter was calculated by Martínez-Arnáiz et al. (2011) by excluding the stars with saturated X-ray and Hα emission from the fit.

Flux–flux relationships between H & K calcium lines (left-hand panel) and Hα (right-hand panel). The red dotted lines represent the power laws that are best fitting the data of Martínez-Arnáiz et al. (2011). The blue dashed line in the right-hand panel represents the fit to the lower branch of the Martínez-Arnáiz et al. (2011) Hα data.
5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
In this work, we have revisited ASCC 123. It is a little-studied young cluster, with no detailed spectroscopic investigation apart our recent study (Frasca et al. 2019). In that paper, we determined the main properties of the cluster, such as distance, age, and chemical composition, by combining Gaia data with high-resolution spectroscopy taken with HARPS-N at the TNG telescope. In this work, we have focused on rotation and magnetic activity. With this aim, we retrieved TESS photometry for all the 55 cluster members reported in Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018). Among them, seven FGK-type stars were observed spectroscopically in our previous work. We performed the analysis of the light curves of the cluster members obtaining the rotational periods and amplitudes for 29 objects. By comparing the distributions of period and amplitude versus colour index with those of some well-studied clusters, we infer a gyrochronological age for ASCC 123 similar to that of the Pleiades, which is consistent with our precedent estimates based on the isochrone fitting and abundance of lithium. No clear correlation between the variation amplitude and Prot is observed, while a Spearman’s coefficient ρ = −0.16 between amplitude and Rossby number suggests only a marginal correlation of these variables. Additionally, for the seven stars with spectra, we have derived the inclination of the rotational axis. Although our sample is not statistically significant, the distribution of inclinations seems to be random, which would be in agreement with that observed in other young open clusters. Finally, we studied the level of magnetic activity of these stars from the Hα and Ca ii H&K lines. We find that the chromospheric activity indicators display a better correlation with the Rossby number [ρ in the range (−0.65, −0.74)]. Moreover, they follow the general trends observed in other active FGKM stars in the flux–flux diagrams.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the anonymous referee for a careful reading of the manuscript and valuable comments and suggestions. This research used the facilities of the Italian Center for Astronomical Archive (IA2) operated by Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF) at the Astronomical Observatory of Trieste. This research has made use of the SIMBAD database and VizieR catalogue access tool, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France.
This work has made use of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission Gaia (https://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia), processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC, https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/consortium). Funding for the DPAC has been provided by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the Gaia Multilateral Agreement.
This paper includes data collected by the TESS mission, which are publicly available from the MAST. Funding for the TESS mission is provided by the NASA’s Science Mission Directorate. This work has been supported by the PRIN-INAF 2019 STRADE (Spectroscopically TRAcing the Disk dispersal Evolution) and by the Large Grant INAF YODA (YSOs Outflow, Discs, and Accretion).
Based on observations made with the Italian TNG operated on the island of La Palma by the Fundación Galileo Galilei of the INAF at the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos, as part of the Large Program ‘Stellar Population Astrophysics’. Based on photometry collected at the INAF–Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The spectroscopic and ground-based photometric data underlying this paper will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author. TESS photometric data are available at https://archive.stsci.edu/.
Footnotes
References
APPENDIX A: GROUND-BASED PHOTOMETRY
As mentioned in Section 2.2, we collected multiband BVRCIC photometry of the three G-type stars S 214, S 435, and S 517 at OACT. Despite the lower photometric precision, compared with TESS data, and the irregular sampling of our photometry, we were able to detect the rotational modulation and derive the period for the two ultrafast rotators (S 214 and S 517). The light curves in the BVRCIC bands of S 214 are shown in Fig. A1. The peak at a rotation period of 0.564 d is the highest one in the cleaned power spectrum of each band and is also recovered from the TESS photometry of this source (see Section 3.1). The amplitudes of the BVRCIC light curves are about 0.11, 0.15, 0.08, and 0.07 mag, respectively. The average magnitudes of these stars in the Johnson–Cousins bands from our OACT photometry are listed in Table A1.

(Left-hand panel) Phased BVRCIC light curves of S 214 collected at OACT. (Right-hand panels) Cleaned periodograms.
Mean Johnson–Cousins magnitudes of the three G-type members observed at OACT.
ID . | B . | err . | V . | Err . | RC . | Err . | IC . | Err . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (mag) . | (mag) . | (mag) . | (mag) . | ||||
214 | 12.866 | 0.031 | 12.192 | 0.051 | 11.769 | 0.026 | 11.403 | 0.022 |
435 | 12.993 | 0.033 | 12.242 | 0.035 | 11.922 | 0.033 | 11.527 | 0.029 |
517 | 13.093 | 0.028 | 12.199 | 0.036 | 11.773 | 0.025 | 11.417 | 0.022 |
ID . | B . | err . | V . | Err . | RC . | Err . | IC . | Err . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (mag) . | (mag) . | (mag) . | (mag) . | ||||
214 | 12.866 | 0.031 | 12.192 | 0.051 | 11.769 | 0.026 | 11.403 | 0.022 |
435 | 12.993 | 0.033 | 12.242 | 0.035 | 11.922 | 0.033 | 11.527 | 0.029 |
517 | 13.093 | 0.028 | 12.199 | 0.036 | 11.773 | 0.025 | 11.417 | 0.022 |
Mean Johnson–Cousins magnitudes of the three G-type members observed at OACT.
ID . | B . | err . | V . | Err . | RC . | Err . | IC . | Err . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (mag) . | (mag) . | (mag) . | (mag) . | ||||
214 | 12.866 | 0.031 | 12.192 | 0.051 | 11.769 | 0.026 | 11.403 | 0.022 |
435 | 12.993 | 0.033 | 12.242 | 0.035 | 11.922 | 0.033 | 11.527 | 0.029 |
517 | 13.093 | 0.028 | 12.199 | 0.036 | 11.773 | 0.025 | 11.417 | 0.022 |
ID . | B . | err . | V . | Err . | RC . | Err . | IC . | Err . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (mag) . | (mag) . | (mag) . | (mag) . | ||||
214 | 12.866 | 0.031 | 12.192 | 0.051 | 11.769 | 0.026 | 11.403 | 0.022 |
435 | 12.993 | 0.033 | 12.242 | 0.035 | 11.922 | 0.033 | 11.527 | 0.029 |
517 | 13.093 | 0.028 | 12.199 | 0.036 | 11.773 | 0.025 | 11.417 | 0.022 |
APPENDIX B: ADDITIONAL FIGURES

TESS light curve of S 39 (TIC 64837857) in 2019 (sectors 16 and 17). The two transits are marked with T1 and T2. The inset in the upper left corner shows the cleaned periodogram of the data excluding the transits; the period corresponding to the maximum power is marked with a vertical red line and is written next to the box. The blue vertical line marks the possible rotational period of about 1.67 d. The inset in the upper right corner displays the data phased with this period.

Zoom of the two transits detected in the TESS light curve of S 39 (TIC 64837857) in sectors 16 (upper panel) and 17 (lower panel).

TESS light curve of S 517 (TIC 428274538) in 2019 (Sector 16). The inset in the upper left corner shows the cleaned periodogram of these data; the rotation period is marked with a vertical red line. The inset in the upper right corner displays the data phased with this period.

TESS light curve of S 554 (TIC 361944360) in 2019 (sector 17). The figure layout is the same as Fig. B3.

TESS light curve of S 435 (TIC 388696341) in 2019 (sectors 16 and 17). The inset in the upper left corner shows the cleaned periodogram of these data; the rotation period is marked with a vertical red line.

TESS light curve of F1 (TIC 66539637) in 2019 (sectors 16 and 17). The figure layout is the same as Fig. B5.

TESS light curve of F2 (TIC 64077901) in 2019 (sectors 16 and 17). The figure layout is the same as Fig. B5.

HARPS-N spectra of the investigated stars in the Hα region. In each box, the non-active template (red line) is overlaid with the observed spectrum (black dots). The chromospheric emission which fills in the Hα core is clearly visible in the subtracted spectrum (blue line in each panel). The green hatched area represents the excess Hα emission that was integrated to obtain WHα. The ID of the source is marked in the lower right corner of each box.