ABSTRACT

1SWASP J162545.15−043027.9 (WASP 1625−04) has been announced as one of EL CVn candidates showing total primary eclipses and ellipsoidal variations. This paper presents the absolute properties of the binary star, based on our high-resolution spectroscopy conducted from 2015 through 2020. From the spectral analysis, the radial velocities (RVs) for both components were obtained with the effective temperature Teff, 1 = 8990 ± 200 K and the rotational rate |$v_1\sin \, i=53\pm 5$| km s−1 for the more massive primary. The RV measurements were analysed with archival WASP photometry. From the modelling we obtained: M1 = 1.745 ± 0.013 M, M2 = 0.187 ± 0.002 M, R1 = 1.626 ± 0.008 M, R2 = 0.290 ± 0.003 M, L1 = 15.5 ± 1.4 L, and L2 = 1.84 ± 0.16 L. In the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram, WASP 1625-04 A lies on the zero-age main sequence and its companion accords well with the helium-core white dwarf models of 0.19 M in the constant luminosity phase. Our improved results demonstrate that WASP 1625−04 is a typical EL CVn-type binary with a low-mass ratio and M2 combination in the thin-disc population and is the product of the stable, non-conservative mass transfer of the precursor binary.

1 INTRODUCTION

Double-lined eclipsing binaries (EBs) provide us with robust determination of fundamental stellar parameters. With time-series spectroscopic and photometric data, we can measure the masses and radii of each component to precisions of 3 per cent or better (Torres, Andersen & Giménez 2010; Maxted et al. 2020). Such measurements have been used to evaluate various theoretical models and to improve them. The best-studied EBs are therefore prime objects for understanding stellar structure and evolutionary processes. Of particular interest are EBs with helium-core white dwarfs (WDs) of |$M_2 \lesssim$| 0.3 M as they cannot evolve from single stars (Marsh, Dhillon & Duck 1995; Kilic, Stanek & Pinsonneault 2007). This is our third paper in a series detecting low-mass WDs in EB systems and studying their physical properties, from new high-resolution spectra combined with photometric data (Lee et al. 2020, Paper I; Hong et al. 2021, Paper II).

EL CVn-type stars are post-mass transfer EBs in which the primary component is an A/F-type main sequence and the secondary one is a He-core WD precursor (pre-He WD; Maxted et al. 2011, 2014; van Roestel et al. 2018). These star systems may be the product of non-conservative binary evolution (Chen et al. 2017), where the initially primary star has lost considerable mass during mass transfer to the red giant branch (RGB), becoming the present pre-He WD secondary, while the mass gainer became the present brighter component as the result of mass accretion. Then, the extremely low-mass WDs are the stellar remnants of the more massive primary component in the precursor binary system, when there is not enough mass to burn the He in its core. Among short-period Algol-type EBs, R CMa stars (Budding & Butland 2011; Lee et al. 2016) share the characteristics of both low-mass ratio q and secondary’s mass M2 with the EL CVn stars. They are divided into semidetached and detached R CMa types. The semidetached systems stop their mass transfer, contract, and then evolve into the detached states. The detached R CMa stars are thought to be just-born EL CVn stars (Lee et al. 2018).

In this study, we present 1SWASP J162545.15−043027.9 (WASP 1625−04; HD 148070; TYC 5043-1022-1; Gaia EDR3 4355789947085032448). The binary star was discovered by Maxted et al. (2014) to be an EL CVn candidate with an eclipsing period of 1.5263234 d, using the photometric data from the Wide Angle Search for Planets (WASP) survey. From their own spectra, a systemic velocity of γ = 9 ± 4 km s−1 was obtained and the spectral type of the brighter component (WASP 1625−04 A) was assigned as A2 V. They further analysed the observed flux distribution and the WASP archive data, and obtained binary model parameters, as follows: effective temperatures T1 = 9500 ± 500 K and T2 = 11,500 ± 1500 K, an orbital inclination of i = 82.5 ± 0.3 deg, a mass ratio of q = 0.126 ± 0.026, and relative radii r1 = 0.2381 ± 0.0025 and r2 = 0.0405 ± 0.0005. The secondary component (WASP 1625−04 B) was expected to be a pre-He WD with a mass of <0.3 M in a thin-disc Galactic population.

The rest of the paper consists of the following. Section 2 describes the WASP public data and our spectroscopic observations. The double-lined radial velocities (RVs) and the primary star’s atmospheric parameters are measured in Section 3. In Section 4, we present the fundamental stellar parameters from updated binary modelling, satisfying the RV and light curves. Finally, Section 5 discusses the evolutionary history of the target star with our conclusions.

2 OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTIONS

2.1 WASP photometry

WASP 1625−04 was observed as part of the WASP survey to find transiting exoplanets (Pollacco et al. 2006; Wilson et al. 2008). The WASP archive data (Butters et al. 2010) of our target star were provided to us by Prof. Pierre Maxted. A total of 54 263 observations were obtained between 2007 August and 2014 March using three cameras: 166 and 33 611 points, respectively, from cameras 142 and 146 (WASP-North on La Palma, Spain), and 20 486 from camera 224 (WASP-South at SAAO, South Africa). They had many outliers showing unrealistically large deviations from the mean trend of the light curve due to some issues, including weather conditions or instrumental effects. In order to exclude them from our analysis, we formed a mean light curve in phase intervals of 0.001 and repeatedly removed data points larger than 3σ values from it. Finally, we selected 50 184 individual points (30 909 from camera 146 and 19 275 from camera 224) corrected using the SYSREM detrending algorithm (Tamuz, Mazeh & Zucker 2005) in this paper. In Fig. 1, the WASP light curve of the program target is depicted as magnitudes versus orbital phases.

Light curve of WASP 1625−04. The circles are individual observations taken from SuperWASP and the solid line represents the synthetic curve obtained with our binary parameters listed in Table 3. The corresponding residuals from this model are plotted in the lower panel.
Figure 1.

Light curve of WASP 1625−04. The circles are individual observations taken from SuperWASP and the solid line represents the synthetic curve obtained with our binary parameters listed in Table 3. The corresponding residuals from this model are plotted in the lower panel.

2.2 New spectroscopy

The spectroscopic observations for WASP 1625−04 were conducted during eight nights between 2015 April and 2020 April, using the 1.8 m telescope and the BOES Ēchelle spectrograph at the Bohyunsan Optical Astronomy Observatory (BOAO) in Korea. The observations covered a wide wavelength range from 3600 to 10 200 |$\mathring{\rm A}$| with a spectral resolving power (R) of 30 000. More information about the instrument was detailed in Kim et al. (2007). The total 48 high-resolution spectra were obtained with an integration time of 1800 s and reduced by utilizing the ccdred and echelle packages in iraf (Hong et al. 2015). The exposure time corresponds to 0.014 of the orbital period, and therefore orbital smearing can be neglected in our analysis. The signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios were extracted using the ‘m’ keystroke of the iraf splot task in the continuum regions between 4000 and 5000 |$\mathring{\rm A}$|⁠. Their typical values were estimated as about 35–40.

3 SPECTRAL ANALYSIS

In order to measure the double-lined RVs of WASP 1625−04, we followed the same method as that in Hong et al. (2019). First of all, we searched for sets of absorption lines from WASP 1625−04 A and B at full wavelength, and found the isolated lines that clearly identify the two in only Mg ii region. In Fig. 2, the phase-folded trailed spectra of Mg ii λ4481 display the sinusoidal tracks caused by the orbital motions of each component. The absorption region was also used for the RV measurements of the EL CVn systems WASP 0131+28 (Lee et al. 2020) and WASP 0843−11 (Hong et al. 2021). We fitted the Mg ii lines with double Gaussian functions of the iraf splot task. As a consequence, the primary and secondary RVs were derived for first time, and are presented in Table 1 and Fig. 3. In this table, some V2 values are missing because they could not be measured by the low S/N ratio and faintness of their observed spectra. We assumed a circular orbit (e = 0) for the EB system, based on the phase difference between two minima in the WASP light curve (Fig. 1) and the sine wave of our RV curves (Fig. 3). Without considering the proximity effects such as ellipticity, reflection, and rotation, the circular orbital elements were obtained by separately applying each component’s RVs to a sine curve (Lee et al. 2018). The sine-curve solution is given in Table 2, which lists the reference epoch T0 and period P of the orbital ephemeris, the systemic velocity γ, the RV semi-amplitude K, the derived semimajor axis a sin i, mass Msin i, and mass ratio q, and the rms residuals from the sine-curve fit. P = 1.5263234 d was taken from Maxted et al. (2014).

Upper panel displays the trailed spectra of WASP 1625−04 in the Mg ii λ4481 region. In the lower panel, the circles and blue and green lines represent the observed spectrum at an orbital phase of 0.74 (HJD 2,458,633.1240) and the synthetic spectra of the primary (WASP 1625−04 A; Teff, 1 = 8990 K, log  g1 = 4.3, v1 sin i = 53 km s−1) and secondary (WASP 1625−04 B; Teff, 2 = 12 500 K, log  g2 = 4.8, v2 sin i = 10 km s−1) components, respectively.
Figure 2.

Upper panel displays the trailed spectra of WASP 1625−04 in the Mg ii λ4481 region. In the lower panel, the circles and blue and green lines represent the observed spectrum at an orbital phase of 0.74 (HJD 2,458,633.1240) and the synthetic spectra of the primary (WASP 1625−04 A; Teff, 1 = 8990 K, log  g1 = 4.3, v1 sin i = 53 km s−1) and secondary (WASP 1625−04 B; Teff, 2 = 12 500 K, log  g2 = 4.8, v2 sin i = 10 km s−1) components, respectively.

RV curves of WASP 1625−04 with fitted models. The blue and green circles are the primary and secondary measurements, respectively. In the upper panel, the solid curves represent the results from a consistent light and RV curve analysis with the W–D program, and the dotted line denotes the system velocity of 20.54 km s−1. The lower panel displays the residuals between measurements and models.
Figure 3.

RV curves of WASP 1625−04 with fitted models. The blue and green circles are the primary and secondary measurements, respectively. In the upper panel, the solid curves represent the results from a consistent light and RV curve analysis with the W–D program, and the dotted line denotes the system velocity of 20.54 km s−1. The lower panel displays the residuals between measurements and models.

Table 1.

Radial velocities of WASP 1625−04.

ut dateHJDV1σ1V2σ2
(km s−1)(km s−1)(km s−1)(km s−1)
2015-04-152,457,128.2569−0.70.6212.41.1
2015-04-172,457,130.230833.01.0
2018-04-172,458,226.228339.31.1−153.51.9
2018-04-172,458,226.249441.41.3−162.60.7
2018-04-172,458,226.270542.61.3−169.70.9
2018-04-172,458,226.291642.61.1−177.71.7
2018-04-172,458,226.312742.21.0−182.61.7
2019-03-132,458,556.253735.21.7−128.52.0
2019-03-132,458,556.274833.81.1−114.32.9
2019-03-132,458,556.295932.41.1
2019-03-132,458,556.317030.31.4
2019-03-132,458,556.338129.11.2−50.21.3
2019-03-132,458,556.359327.11.5
2019-04-082,458,582.209635.60.9−121.52.1
2019-04-082,458,582.230833.51.4−99.41.6
2019-04-082,458,582.251932.30.9−91.81.9
2019-04-082,458,582.273030.30.8−69.71.0
2019-04-082,458,582.294129.31.3
2019-04-082,458,582.315225.30.9
2019-05-292,458,633.01800.30.6201.21.0
2019-05-292,458,633.03940.00.7210.11.3
2019-05-292,458,633.06051.21.7217.21.1
2019-05-292,458,633.0816−1.60.6219.81.1
2019-05-292,458,633.1028−1.10.9224.81.0
2019-05-292,458,633.1240−1.30.7225.73.3
2019-05-292,458,633.1451−1.20.5224.21.3
2019-05-292,458,633.1663−0.90.7220.91.6
2019-05-292,458,633.1874−1.81.5220.91.4
2019-05-292,458,633.2086−1.10.9219.80.7
2019-05-292,458,633.23370.40.7207.80.9
2019-05-292,458,633.25480.60.8202.61.0
2019-06-032,458,638.032216.01.3
2019-06-032,458,638.053418.81.0
2019-06-032,458,638.074621.00.7
2019-06-032,458,638.095720.91.1
2019-06-032,458,638.116822.20.5
2019-06-032,458,638.138123.90.7
2019-06-032,458,638.159225.30.9
2019-06-032,458,638.180528.40.7−55.91.9
2019-06-032,458,638.201628.01.1−67.71.5
2019-06-032,458,638.222830.20.9−82.70.9
2020-04-252,458,965.118142.50.6−182.53.3
2020-04-252,458,965.139342.31.5
2020-04-252,458,965.160441.91.0
2020-04-252,458,965.181541.70.9−174.11.2
2020-04-252,458,965.202641.20.8
2020-04-252,458,965.223840.70.7−165.50.9
2020-04-252,458,965.242838.90.6−155.00.7
ut dateHJDV1σ1V2σ2
(km s−1)(km s−1)(km s−1)(km s−1)
2015-04-152,457,128.2569−0.70.6212.41.1
2015-04-172,457,130.230833.01.0
2018-04-172,458,226.228339.31.1−153.51.9
2018-04-172,458,226.249441.41.3−162.60.7
2018-04-172,458,226.270542.61.3−169.70.9
2018-04-172,458,226.291642.61.1−177.71.7
2018-04-172,458,226.312742.21.0−182.61.7
2019-03-132,458,556.253735.21.7−128.52.0
2019-03-132,458,556.274833.81.1−114.32.9
2019-03-132,458,556.295932.41.1
2019-03-132,458,556.317030.31.4
2019-03-132,458,556.338129.11.2−50.21.3
2019-03-132,458,556.359327.11.5
2019-04-082,458,582.209635.60.9−121.52.1
2019-04-082,458,582.230833.51.4−99.41.6
2019-04-082,458,582.251932.30.9−91.81.9
2019-04-082,458,582.273030.30.8−69.71.0
2019-04-082,458,582.294129.31.3
2019-04-082,458,582.315225.30.9
2019-05-292,458,633.01800.30.6201.21.0
2019-05-292,458,633.03940.00.7210.11.3
2019-05-292,458,633.06051.21.7217.21.1
2019-05-292,458,633.0816−1.60.6219.81.1
2019-05-292,458,633.1028−1.10.9224.81.0
2019-05-292,458,633.1240−1.30.7225.73.3
2019-05-292,458,633.1451−1.20.5224.21.3
2019-05-292,458,633.1663−0.90.7220.91.6
2019-05-292,458,633.1874−1.81.5220.91.4
2019-05-292,458,633.2086−1.10.9219.80.7
2019-05-292,458,633.23370.40.7207.80.9
2019-05-292,458,633.25480.60.8202.61.0
2019-06-032,458,638.032216.01.3
2019-06-032,458,638.053418.81.0
2019-06-032,458,638.074621.00.7
2019-06-032,458,638.095720.91.1
2019-06-032,458,638.116822.20.5
2019-06-032,458,638.138123.90.7
2019-06-032,458,638.159225.30.9
2019-06-032,458,638.180528.40.7−55.91.9
2019-06-032,458,638.201628.01.1−67.71.5
2019-06-032,458,638.222830.20.9−82.70.9
2020-04-252,458,965.118142.50.6−182.53.3
2020-04-252,458,965.139342.31.5
2020-04-252,458,965.160441.91.0
2020-04-252,458,965.181541.70.9−174.11.2
2020-04-252,458,965.202641.20.8
2020-04-252,458,965.223840.70.7−165.50.9
2020-04-252,458,965.242838.90.6−155.00.7
Table 1.

Radial velocities of WASP 1625−04.

ut dateHJDV1σ1V2σ2
(km s−1)(km s−1)(km s−1)(km s−1)
2015-04-152,457,128.2569−0.70.6212.41.1
2015-04-172,457,130.230833.01.0
2018-04-172,458,226.228339.31.1−153.51.9
2018-04-172,458,226.249441.41.3−162.60.7
2018-04-172,458,226.270542.61.3−169.70.9
2018-04-172,458,226.291642.61.1−177.71.7
2018-04-172,458,226.312742.21.0−182.61.7
2019-03-132,458,556.253735.21.7−128.52.0
2019-03-132,458,556.274833.81.1−114.32.9
2019-03-132,458,556.295932.41.1
2019-03-132,458,556.317030.31.4
2019-03-132,458,556.338129.11.2−50.21.3
2019-03-132,458,556.359327.11.5
2019-04-082,458,582.209635.60.9−121.52.1
2019-04-082,458,582.230833.51.4−99.41.6
2019-04-082,458,582.251932.30.9−91.81.9
2019-04-082,458,582.273030.30.8−69.71.0
2019-04-082,458,582.294129.31.3
2019-04-082,458,582.315225.30.9
2019-05-292,458,633.01800.30.6201.21.0
2019-05-292,458,633.03940.00.7210.11.3
2019-05-292,458,633.06051.21.7217.21.1
2019-05-292,458,633.0816−1.60.6219.81.1
2019-05-292,458,633.1028−1.10.9224.81.0
2019-05-292,458,633.1240−1.30.7225.73.3
2019-05-292,458,633.1451−1.20.5224.21.3
2019-05-292,458,633.1663−0.90.7220.91.6
2019-05-292,458,633.1874−1.81.5220.91.4
2019-05-292,458,633.2086−1.10.9219.80.7
2019-05-292,458,633.23370.40.7207.80.9
2019-05-292,458,633.25480.60.8202.61.0
2019-06-032,458,638.032216.01.3
2019-06-032,458,638.053418.81.0
2019-06-032,458,638.074621.00.7
2019-06-032,458,638.095720.91.1
2019-06-032,458,638.116822.20.5
2019-06-032,458,638.138123.90.7
2019-06-032,458,638.159225.30.9
2019-06-032,458,638.180528.40.7−55.91.9
2019-06-032,458,638.201628.01.1−67.71.5
2019-06-032,458,638.222830.20.9−82.70.9
2020-04-252,458,965.118142.50.6−182.53.3
2020-04-252,458,965.139342.31.5
2020-04-252,458,965.160441.91.0
2020-04-252,458,965.181541.70.9−174.11.2
2020-04-252,458,965.202641.20.8
2020-04-252,458,965.223840.70.7−165.50.9
2020-04-252,458,965.242838.90.6−155.00.7
ut dateHJDV1σ1V2σ2
(km s−1)(km s−1)(km s−1)(km s−1)
2015-04-152,457,128.2569−0.70.6212.41.1
2015-04-172,457,130.230833.01.0
2018-04-172,458,226.228339.31.1−153.51.9
2018-04-172,458,226.249441.41.3−162.60.7
2018-04-172,458,226.270542.61.3−169.70.9
2018-04-172,458,226.291642.61.1−177.71.7
2018-04-172,458,226.312742.21.0−182.61.7
2019-03-132,458,556.253735.21.7−128.52.0
2019-03-132,458,556.274833.81.1−114.32.9
2019-03-132,458,556.295932.41.1
2019-03-132,458,556.317030.31.4
2019-03-132,458,556.338129.11.2−50.21.3
2019-03-132,458,556.359327.11.5
2019-04-082,458,582.209635.60.9−121.52.1
2019-04-082,458,582.230833.51.4−99.41.6
2019-04-082,458,582.251932.30.9−91.81.9
2019-04-082,458,582.273030.30.8−69.71.0
2019-04-082,458,582.294129.31.3
2019-04-082,458,582.315225.30.9
2019-05-292,458,633.01800.30.6201.21.0
2019-05-292,458,633.03940.00.7210.11.3
2019-05-292,458,633.06051.21.7217.21.1
2019-05-292,458,633.0816−1.60.6219.81.1
2019-05-292,458,633.1028−1.10.9224.81.0
2019-05-292,458,633.1240−1.30.7225.73.3
2019-05-292,458,633.1451−1.20.5224.21.3
2019-05-292,458,633.1663−0.90.7220.91.6
2019-05-292,458,633.1874−1.81.5220.91.4
2019-05-292,458,633.2086−1.10.9219.80.7
2019-05-292,458,633.23370.40.7207.80.9
2019-05-292,458,633.25480.60.8202.61.0
2019-06-032,458,638.032216.01.3
2019-06-032,458,638.053418.81.0
2019-06-032,458,638.074621.00.7
2019-06-032,458,638.095720.91.1
2019-06-032,458,638.116822.20.5
2019-06-032,458,638.138123.90.7
2019-06-032,458,638.159225.30.9
2019-06-032,458,638.180528.40.7−55.91.9
2019-06-032,458,638.201628.01.1−67.71.5
2019-06-032,458,638.222830.20.9−82.70.9
2020-04-252,458,965.118142.50.6−182.53.3
2020-04-252,458,965.139342.31.5
2020-04-252,458,965.160441.91.0
2020-04-252,458,965.181541.70.9−174.11.2
2020-04-252,458,965.202641.20.8
2020-04-252,458,965.223840.70.7−165.50.9
2020-04-252,458,965.242838.90.6−155.00.7
Table 2.

Orbital elements of WASP 1625−04 derived with sine-curve fits.

ParameterPrimarySecondary
T0 (HJD)2,458,638.0957 ± 0.0019
P (d)|$\rm ^a$|1.5263234
γ (km s−1)20.60 ± 0.1319.30 ± 0.66
K (km s−1)22.09 ± 0.20206.16 ± 0.79
asin i (R)0.666 ± 0.0066.217 ± 0.024
Msin 3i (M)1.699 ± 0.0140.182 ± 0.002
q (= MB/MA)0.1072 ± 0.0011
rms (km s−1)0.843.5
ParameterPrimarySecondary
T0 (HJD)2,458,638.0957 ± 0.0019
P (d)|$\rm ^a$|1.5263234
γ (km s−1)20.60 ± 0.1319.30 ± 0.66
K (km s−1)22.09 ± 0.20206.16 ± 0.79
asin i (R)0.666 ± 0.0066.217 ± 0.024
Msin 3i (M)1.699 ± 0.0140.182 ± 0.002
q (= MB/MA)0.1072 ± 0.0011
rms (km s−1)0.843.5

Note. aFixed.

Table 2.

Orbital elements of WASP 1625−04 derived with sine-curve fits.

ParameterPrimarySecondary
T0 (HJD)2,458,638.0957 ± 0.0019
P (d)|$\rm ^a$|1.5263234
γ (km s−1)20.60 ± 0.1319.30 ± 0.66
K (km s−1)22.09 ± 0.20206.16 ± 0.79
asin i (R)0.666 ± 0.0066.217 ± 0.024
Msin 3i (M)1.699 ± 0.0140.182 ± 0.002
q (= MB/MA)0.1072 ± 0.0011
rms (km s−1)0.843.5
ParameterPrimarySecondary
T0 (HJD)2,458,638.0957 ± 0.0019
P (d)|$\rm ^a$|1.5263234
γ (km s−1)20.60 ± 0.1319.30 ± 0.66
K (km s−1)22.09 ± 0.20206.16 ± 0.79
asin i (R)0.666 ± 0.0066.217 ± 0.024
Msin 3i (M)1.699 ± 0.0140.182 ± 0.002
q (= MB/MA)0.1072 ± 0.0011
rms (km s−1)0.843.5

Note. aFixed.

The atmospheric parameters of WASP 1625−04 were yielded by using the χ2 minimization method between disentangling spectra and theoretical stellar models. For this process, the disentangling spectra of WASP 1625−04 A and B were constructed with the fdbinary code, which is based on a Fourier decomposition technique (Ilijić et al. 2004). Their S/N ratios were measured to be about 100 and 60 in the same order as before. However, as shown in Fig. 4, we could not obtain a high-quality spectrum for the secondary star, because of its low contribution LB/LA = 6 per cent (Maxted et al. 2014). From the observed flux distribution and their low-resolution spectra, Maxted et al. (2014) estimated the effective temperature and spectral type of the primary star to be 9500 ± 500 K and A2 V, respectively. Thus, our theoretical models were calculated using surface temperatures (Teff, 1) of 8000–12 000 K with steps of 10 K and rotational velocities (v1sin i) of 10–200 km s−1 with steps of 1 km s−1 based on the BOSZ spectral library1 (Bohlin et al. 2017). In these grids, the solar metallicity was applied and the surface gravity was kept fixed to log  g = 4.3 (cf. Section 4). The model spectra were converted from vacuum to air wavelengths using the IAU standard given in Morton (1991).

Five spectral regions of WASP 1625–04 AB. The filled and open circles are the disentangling spectra of the primary (A) and secondary (B) stars, respectively, obtained with the fdbinary code. The red and pink lines represent their synthetic spectra using the same values as in Fig. 2.
Figure 4.

Five spectral regions of WASP 1625–04 AB. The filled and open circles are the disentangling spectra of the primary (A) and secondary (B) stars, respectively, obtained with the fdbinary code. The red and pink lines represent their synthetic spectra using the same values as in Fig. 2.

Finding the optimal values for Teff, 1 and v1sin i, we selected five spectral regions, such as Ca ii K λ3933, Fe i λ4046, H γ, Mg ii λ4481, and H β, which are useful in temperature classifications (Gray & Corbally 2009). As a result of this process, we obtained the two atmospheric parameters of Teff, 1 = 8990 ± 200 K and v1sin i = 53 ± 5 km s−1. These values and their uncertainties are the mean and standard deviation of the best-fitting values obtained in these regions. The disentangling and synthetic spectra for the chosen spectral regions are presented as circles and red lines in Fig. 4, respectively.

4 BINARY MODELLING

Despite its rather large scatter, the light curve of WASP 1625−04 in Fig. 1 indicates that the primary minimum is a total eclipse. As expected for EL CVn type (Maxted et al. 2014), this feature may be ascribed to the occultation of the pre-He WD secondary (WASP 0131+28 B) by the more massive but cooler primary (WASP 0131+28 A). Maxted et al. (2014) reported a photometric solution of the system analysing the WASP light curves with the jktebop code (Southworth 2010). For the binary star model, we used our RV curves and the selected WASP data, and applied the detached mode 2 of the Wilson–Devinney (W-D) modelling code (Wilson & Devinney 1971, van Hamme & Wilson 2007) to the two kinds of observations. The proximity corrections of the RVs were also considered. The modelling process is almost identical to the method performed for OO Dra (Lee et al. 2018) and WASP 0131+28 (Lee et al. 2020). Here, the subscripts 1 and 2 denote WASP 1625−04 A and B, respectively.

Based on our spectroscopic results, the effective temperature of WASP 1625−04 A was set to be T1 = 8990 ± 200 K, and the orbital parameters of a, γ, and q were initialized from Table 2. In the same way as Lee et al. (2020), we used the bolometric albedos of A1, 2 = 1.0, the gravity-darkening exponents of g1, 2 = 1.0, and the logarithmic limb-darkening law with coefficient interpolated from the tables of van Hamme (1993). The light and RV curves were repeatedly analysed until both of them were satisfied. In this modelling, 10 parameters are adjustable: the eclipse ephemeris (T0, P), the spectroscopic elements (a, γ, q), the inclination angle (i), the secondary’s temperature (T2), the surface potentials (Ω1, 2), and the primary’s luminosity (l1). The final solution is illustrated in Table 3 and shown as the solid lines in Figs 1 and 3. The corresponding residuals are presented in the lower panels of each figure. Here, they indicate that our binary modelling is a good solution of the two data sets. At this point, the orbital eccentricity and argument of periastron were added to the fitted parameters. The search retained a value of zero (e = 0) within a margin of error. Recently, Lagos et al. (2021) detected tertiary components in all of the five EL CVn binaries that they observed. The result implies that most of the EL CVn stars are at least triplets. Thus, we examined whether a third light source existed or not in the WASP public data but none was found, with an upper limit of 0.001.

Table 3.

Light and RV parameters of WASP 1625−04.

ParameterPrimarySecondary
T0 (HJD)2,454,973.39195 ± 0.00062
P (d)1.52632329 ± 0.00000056
a (R)6.946 ± 0.024
γ (km s−1)20.54 ± 0.12
K1 (km s−1)22.16 ± 0.19
K2 (km s−1)206.41 ± 0.73
q0.1074 ± 0.0010
i (deg)82.94 ± 0.14
T (K)8990 ± 20012,500 ± 270
Ω4.398 ± 0.0164.013 ± 0.018
|$\Omega _{\rm in} \rm ^a$|1.982
XY0.655, 0.1050.741, 0.076
xy0.549, 0.2500.451, 0.233
l/(l1 + l2)0.9437 ± 0.00040.0563 ± 0.0004
r (pole)0.2329 ± 0.00090.0418 ± 0.0004
r (point)0.2352 ± 0.00090.0419 ± 0.0004
r (side)0.2346 ± 0.00090.0418 ± 0.0004
r (back)0.2350 ± 0.00090.0419 ± 0.0004
r (volume)|$\rm ^b$|0.2342 ± 0.00090.0418 ± 0.0004
ParameterPrimarySecondary
T0 (HJD)2,454,973.39195 ± 0.00062
P (d)1.52632329 ± 0.00000056
a (R)6.946 ± 0.024
γ (km s−1)20.54 ± 0.12
K1 (km s−1)22.16 ± 0.19
K2 (km s−1)206.41 ± 0.73
q0.1074 ± 0.0010
i (deg)82.94 ± 0.14
T (K)8990 ± 20012,500 ± 270
Ω4.398 ± 0.0164.013 ± 0.018
|$\Omega _{\rm in} \rm ^a$|1.982
XY0.655, 0.1050.741, 0.076
xy0.549, 0.2500.451, 0.233
l/(l1 + l2)0.9437 ± 0.00040.0563 ± 0.0004
r (pole)0.2329 ± 0.00090.0418 ± 0.0004
r (point)0.2352 ± 0.00090.0419 ± 0.0004
r (side)0.2346 ± 0.00090.0418 ± 0.0004
r (back)0.2350 ± 0.00090.0419 ± 0.0004
r (volume)|$\rm ^b$|0.2342 ± 0.00090.0418 ± 0.0004

Notes. aPotential for the inner critical Roche surface.

bMean volume radius.

Table 3.

Light and RV parameters of WASP 1625−04.

ParameterPrimarySecondary
T0 (HJD)2,454,973.39195 ± 0.00062
P (d)1.52632329 ± 0.00000056
a (R)6.946 ± 0.024
γ (km s−1)20.54 ± 0.12
K1 (km s−1)22.16 ± 0.19
K2 (km s−1)206.41 ± 0.73
q0.1074 ± 0.0010
i (deg)82.94 ± 0.14
T (K)8990 ± 20012,500 ± 270
Ω4.398 ± 0.0164.013 ± 0.018
|$\Omega _{\rm in} \rm ^a$|1.982
XY0.655, 0.1050.741, 0.076
xy0.549, 0.2500.451, 0.233
l/(l1 + l2)0.9437 ± 0.00040.0563 ± 0.0004
r (pole)0.2329 ± 0.00090.0418 ± 0.0004
r (point)0.2352 ± 0.00090.0419 ± 0.0004
r (side)0.2346 ± 0.00090.0418 ± 0.0004
r (back)0.2350 ± 0.00090.0419 ± 0.0004
r (volume)|$\rm ^b$|0.2342 ± 0.00090.0418 ± 0.0004
ParameterPrimarySecondary
T0 (HJD)2,454,973.39195 ± 0.00062
P (d)1.52632329 ± 0.00000056
a (R)6.946 ± 0.024
γ (km s−1)20.54 ± 0.12
K1 (km s−1)22.16 ± 0.19
K2 (km s−1)206.41 ± 0.73
q0.1074 ± 0.0010
i (deg)82.94 ± 0.14
T (K)8990 ± 20012,500 ± 270
Ω4.398 ± 0.0164.013 ± 0.018
|$\Omega _{\rm in} \rm ^a$|1.982
XY0.655, 0.1050.741, 0.076
xy0.549, 0.2500.451, 0.233
l/(l1 + l2)0.9437 ± 0.00040.0563 ± 0.0004
r (pole)0.2329 ± 0.00090.0418 ± 0.0004
r (point)0.2352 ± 0.00090.0419 ± 0.0004
r (side)0.2346 ± 0.00090.0418 ± 0.0004
r (back)0.2350 ± 0.00090.0419 ± 0.0004
r (volume)|$\rm ^b$|0.2342 ± 0.00090.0418 ± 0.0004

Notes. aPotential for the inner critical Roche surface.

bMean volume radius.

From the combined solution of the RV and light curves in Table 3, we determined straightforwardly the absolute parameters for WASP 1625−04. For this computation, we adopted the solar values of Teff⊙ = 5780 K and Mbol⊙ = + 4.73 and the empirical calibration of log Teff and bolometric corrections (BCs) in Torres (2010). The results are shown in Table 4. The masses and radii were measured to 0.7 per cent and 0.5 per cent precision for the massive primary component, respectively, and 1.1 per cent and 1.0 per cent for the hotter secondary. For the distance determination to WASP 1625−04, we used its apparent magnitude and colour excess at V = + 10.362 ± 0.029 and E(BV) = + 0.158 ± 0.004, respectively, extracted from the APASS BV gri′ photometry (Munari et al. 2014). In consequence, our distance of 420 ± 22 pc is concurrent with the Gaia EDR3 measurement of 408 ± 6 pc taken from a parallax of 2.449 ± 0.033 mas (Gaia Collaboration 2021).

Table 4.

Absolute parameters of WASP 1625−04.

ParameterPrimarySecondary
M (M)1.745 ± 0.0130.187 ± 0.002
R (R)1.626 ± 0.0080.290 ± 0.003
log  g (cgs)4.258 ± 0.0054.785 ± 0.010
ρ (ρ)0.407 ± 0.0077.68 ± 0.25
vsync (km s−1)53.91 ± 0.279.62 ± 0.10
vsin i (km s−1)53 ± 5
Teff (K)8990 ± 20012,500 ± 270
L (L)15.5 ± 1.41.84 ± 0.16
Mbol (mag)1.76 ± 0.104.07 ± 0.10
BC (mag)−0.06 ± 0.03−0.78 ± 0.05
MV (mag)1.82 ± 0.104.85 ± 0.11
Distance (pc)420 ± 22
ParameterPrimarySecondary
M (M)1.745 ± 0.0130.187 ± 0.002
R (R)1.626 ± 0.0080.290 ± 0.003
log  g (cgs)4.258 ± 0.0054.785 ± 0.010
ρ (ρ)0.407 ± 0.0077.68 ± 0.25
vsync (km s−1)53.91 ± 0.279.62 ± 0.10
vsin i (km s−1)53 ± 5
Teff (K)8990 ± 20012,500 ± 270
L (L)15.5 ± 1.41.84 ± 0.16
Mbol (mag)1.76 ± 0.104.07 ± 0.10
BC (mag)−0.06 ± 0.03−0.78 ± 0.05
MV (mag)1.82 ± 0.104.85 ± 0.11
Distance (pc)420 ± 22
Table 4.

Absolute parameters of WASP 1625−04.

ParameterPrimarySecondary
M (M)1.745 ± 0.0130.187 ± 0.002
R (R)1.626 ± 0.0080.290 ± 0.003
log  g (cgs)4.258 ± 0.0054.785 ± 0.010
ρ (ρ)0.407 ± 0.0077.68 ± 0.25
vsync (km s−1)53.91 ± 0.279.62 ± 0.10
vsin i (km s−1)53 ± 5
Teff (K)8990 ± 20012,500 ± 270
L (L)15.5 ± 1.41.84 ± 0.16
Mbol (mag)1.76 ± 0.104.07 ± 0.10
BC (mag)−0.06 ± 0.03−0.78 ± 0.05
MV (mag)1.82 ± 0.104.85 ± 0.11
Distance (pc)420 ± 22
ParameterPrimarySecondary
M (M)1.745 ± 0.0130.187 ± 0.002
R (R)1.626 ± 0.0080.290 ± 0.003
log  g (cgs)4.258 ± 0.0054.785 ± 0.010
ρ (ρ)0.407 ± 0.0077.68 ± 0.25
vsync (km s−1)53.91 ± 0.279.62 ± 0.10
vsin i (km s−1)53 ± 5
Teff (K)8990 ± 20012,500 ± 270
L (L)15.5 ± 1.41.84 ± 0.16
Mbol (mag)1.76 ± 0.104.07 ± 0.10
BC (mag)−0.06 ± 0.03−0.78 ± 0.05
MV (mag)1.82 ± 0.104.85 ± 0.11
Distance (pc)420 ± 22

5 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

We reported and studied our Echelle spectroscopy of the eclipsing binary star WASP 1625−04, together with the WASP public data. The RV measurements of both components were obtained from the BOES spectra. Utilizing the χ2 minimization method, we found the primary’s temperature to be Teff, 1 = 8990 ± 200 K and the projected rotational rate to be v1sin i = 53 ± 5 km s−1. A simultaneous modelling of the RV and WASP data, combined with the atmospheric parameters, robustly yielded the fundamental parameters for our target star. The mass and radius of WASP 1625−04 A were determined to a precision of better than 0.7 per cent and those of its companion to about 1 per cent. Our modelling results represent that WASP 1625−04 is a short-period detached binary with both low q and M2, typical of the EL CVn type. Calculated from each star’s radius and the binary period, the synchronous rotations are v1, syncsin i = 53.9 ± 0.3 km s−1 and v2, syncsin i = 9.6 ± 0.1 km s−1, respectively, wherein the former value is in line with our BOES measurement.

Using the solar motion of (U, V, W) = (9.58, 10.52, 7.01) km s−1 (Tian et al. 2015) in the local standard of rest, we calculated the space velocity of WASP 1625−04 to be (UVW)2 = (29.0 ± 0.1, 241.4 ± 0.4, 11.6 ± 0.3) km s−1 using the formulas given by Johnson & Soderblom (1987). Here, the proper motion (μαcos δ, μδ) is taken from the Gaia EDR3, and the system velocity (γ) and distance are from our results. Then, using the orbit6 code of Odenkirchen & Brosche (1992), we computed the z-component of the angular momentum and the eccentricity of the system’s Galactic orbit to be Jz = 1847 ± 92 kpc km s−1 and e = 0.1320 ± 0.0004, respectively. For more details about this procedure, see Lee et al. (2020). The kinematic data of WASP 1625−04 agrees with the thin-disc population in the UV and Jze diagrams of Pauli et al. (2006).

To understand the evolutionary history of WASP 1625−04, the positions of both components in the Hertzsprung–Russell (HR) diagram are displayed in the left-hand panel of Fig. 5, where the blue, green, and cyan lines are the He-core WD models with metallicities Z of 0.001, 0.01, and 0.02, respectively, for a mass of 0.19 M (Istrate et al. 2016). In the HR diagram, the more massive primary component is located on the zero-age main sequence (ZAMS), while the hotter companion with 0.187 ± 0.002 M is in the constant luminosity phase and consistent with both models of Z = 0.001 and 0.01. This clearly shows that WASP 1625−04 B is a pre-He WD. From the MWDt relations presented by Chen et al. (2017), we calculated the lifetime (t) during the pre-He WD stage of WASP 1625−04 B to be about 7.4 × 108 yr.

Position of WASP 1625−04 AB (star symbols) in the HR and MWD–log P diagrams. In the left-hand panel, the black line denotes the ZAMS stars, and the three-coloured curves are the evolutionary tracks of a 0.19 M⊙ He WD with different metallicities Z from the models of Istrate et al. (2016). In the right-hand panel, the circle and square symbols refer to EL CVn and R CMa stars, respectively, and the solid line denotes the theoretical relation adopted from Lin et al. (2011).
Figure 5.

Position of WASP 1625−04 AB (star symbols) in the HR and MWD–log P diagrams. In the left-hand panel, the black line denotes the ZAMS stars, and the three-coloured curves are the evolutionary tracks of a 0.19 M He WD with different metallicities Z from the models of Istrate et al. (2016). In the right-hand panel, the circle and square symbols refer to EL CVn and R CMa stars, respectively, and the solid line denotes the theoretical relation adopted from Lin et al. (2011).

Meanwhile, it is known that extremely low-mass WDs less than ∼0.3 M are generally formed by two channels: common-envelope ejection and stable Roche lobe overflow (cf. Li et al. 2019). Recently, Chen et al. (2017) argued that the latter channel is the most likely formation process of the EL CVn binaries. In the case of stable mass transfer, Lin et al. (2011) reported that there is a tight relation between the WD masses MWD and the binary periods P. We put WASP 1625−04 B on the MWD–log P diagram in the right-hand panel of Fig. 5, together with eight double-lined R CMa (Wang et al. 2019) and five EL CVn stars: KOI-81 (Matson et al. 2015), WASP 0131+28 (Lee et al. 2020), WASP 0247−25 (Kim et al. 2021), WASP 0843−11 (Hong et al. 2021), and WASP 1323+43 (EL CVn, Wang et al. 2020). As one can see in this panel, almost all the stars except KOI-81, which has a relatively long period of P = 23.8776 d, seem to coincide with the theoretical relation of Lin et al. (2011). The results indicate that most of the pre-He WD companions in the R CMa and EL CVn binaries are the product of the stable mass transfer episode, and that WASP 1625−04 is a post-mass transfer binary system, comprising an A2 V gainer and a pre-He WD of mass 0.187 M.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This paper was based on observations obtained at the BOAO, which is operated by the Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute (KASI). We would like to thank the BOAO staffs for assistance during our spectroscopy and Prof. Pierre Maxted for sending us the WASP archival data. Funding for WASP comes from the consortium universities and from the UK’s Science and Technology Facilities Council. We appreciate the careful reading and valuable comments of the anonymous referee. This research was supported by the KASI grant 2021-1-830-08. KH was supported by the grants 2019R1A2C2085965 and 2020R1A4A2002885 from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the first author.

Footnotes

2

Positive towards the Galactic Centre, Galactic rotation, and North Galactic Pole.

REFERENCES

Bohlin
R. C.
et al. ,
2017
,
AJ
,
153
,
234

Budding
E.
,
Butland
R.
,
2011
,
MNRAS
,
418
,
1764

Butters
O. W.
et al. ,
2010
,
A&A
,
520
,
L10

Chen
X.
,
Maxted
P. F. L.
,
Li
J.
,
Han
Z.
,
2017
,
MNRAS
,
467
,
1874

Gaia Collaboration
,
2021
,
A&A
,
649
,
A1

Gray
R. O.
,
Corbally
C.
,
2009
,
Stellar Spectral Classification
.
Princeton Univ. Press
,
Princeton, NJ

Hong
K.
et al. ,
2015
,
AJ
,
150
,
131

Hong
K.
et al. ,
2019
,
AJ
,
157
,
28

Hong
K.
et al. ,
2021
,
AJ
,
161
,
137
(Paper II)

Ilijić
S.
,
Hensberge
H.
,
Pavlovski
K.
,
Freyhammer
L. M.
,
2004
, in
Hilditch
R.
,
Hensberge
H.
,
Pavlovski
K.
, eds,
ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 318, Spectroscopically and Spatially Resolving the Components of the Close Binary Stars
.
Astron. Soc. Pac
,
San Francisco, CA
, p.
111

Istrate
A. G.
et al. ,
2016
,
A&A
,
595
,
A35

Johnson
D. R. H.
,
Soderblom
D. R.
,
1987
,
AJ
,
93
,
864

Kilic
M.
,
Stanek
K. Z.
,
Pinsonneault
M. H.
,
2007
,
ApJ
,
671
,
761

Kim
K.-M.
et al. ,
2007
,
PASP
,
119
,
1052

Kim
S.-L.
et al. ,
2021
,
AJ
,
162
,
212

Lagos
F.
,
Schreiber
M. R.
,
Parsons
S. G.
,
Gänsicke
B. T.
,
Godoy
N.
,
2021
,
MNRAS
,
499
,
L21

Lee
J. W.
,
Kim
S.-L.
,
Hong
K.
,
Koo
J.-R.
,
Lee
C.-U.
,
Youn
J.-H.
,
2016
,
AJ
,
151
,
25

Lee
J. W.
,
Hong
K.
,
Koo
J.-R.
,
Park
J.-H.
,
2018
,
AJ
,
155
,
5

Lee
J. W.
,
Koo
J.-R.
,
Hong
K.
,
Park
J.-H.
,
2020
,
AJ
,
160
,
49
(Paper I)

Li
Z.
,
Chen
X.
,
Chen
H.-L.
,
Han
Z.
,
2019
,
ApJ
,
871
,
148

Lin
J.
et al. ,
2011
,
ApJ
,
732
,
70

Marsh
T. R.
,
Dhillon
V. S.
,
Duck
S. R.
,
1995
,
MNRAS
,
275
,
828

Matson
R. A.
et al. ,
2015
,
ApJ
,
806
,
155

Maxted
P. F. L.
et al. ,
2011
,
MNRAS
,
418
,
1156

Maxted
P. F. L.
et al. ,
2014
,
MNRAS
,
437
,
168

Maxted
P. F. L.
et al. ,
2020
,
MNRAS
,
498
,
332

Morton
D. C.
,
1991
,
ApJS
,
77
,
119

Munari
U.
et al. ,
2014
,
AJ
,
148
,
81

Odenkirchen
M.
,
Brosche
P.
,
1992
,
Astron. Nachr.
,
313
,
69

Pauli
E.-M.
,
Napiwotzki
R.
,
Heber
U.
,
Altmann
M.
,
Odenkirchen
M.
,
2006
,
A&A
,
447
,
173

Pollacco
D. L.
et al. ,
2006
,
PASP
,
118
,
1407

Southworth
J.
,
2010
,
MNRAS
,
408
,
1689

Tamuz
O.
,
Mazeh
T.
,
Zucker
S.
,
2005
,
MNRAS
,
356
,
1466

Tian
H.-J.
et al. ,
2015
,
ApJ
,
809
,
145

Torres
G.
,
2010
,
AJ
,
140
,
1158

Torres
G.
,
Andersen
J.
,
Giménez
A.
,
2010
,
A&AR
,
18
,
67

van Hamme
W.
,
1993
,
AJ
,
106
,
209

van Hamme
W.
,
Wilson
R. E.
,
2007
,
ApJ
,
661
,
1129

van Roestel
J.
et al. ,
2018
,
MNRAS
,
475
,
2560

Wang
K.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Luo
Y.
,
Luo
C.
,
2019
,
MNRAS
,
486
,
2462

Wang
K.
et al. ,
2020
,
AJ
,
159
,
4

Wilson
R. E.
,
Devinney
E. J.
,
1971
,
ApJ
,
166
,
605

Wilson
D. M.
et al. ,
2008
,
ApJ
,
675
,
L113

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)