Abstract

We perform a detailed abundance analysis on integrated-light spectra of 20 globular clusters (GCs) in the early-type galaxy NGC 5128 (Centaurus A). The GCs were observed with X-Shooter on the Very Large Telescope (VLT). The cluster sample spans a metallicity range of −1.92 < [Fe/H] < −0.13 dex. Using theoretical isochrones, we compute synthetic integrated-light spectra and iterate the individual abundances until the best fit to the observations is obtained. We measured abundances of Mg, Ca, and Ti, and find a slightly higher enhancement in NGC 5128 GCs with metallicities [Fe/H] < −0.75 dex, of the order of ∼0.1 dex, than in the average values observed in the Milky Way (MW) for GCs of the same metallicity. If this α-enhancement in the metal-poor GCs in NGC 5128 is genuine, it could hint at a chemical enrichment history different than that experienced by the MW. We also measure Na abundances in 9 out of 20 GCs. We find evidence for intracluster abundance variations in six of these clusters where we see enhanced [Na/Fe] > +0.25 dex. We obtain the first abundance measurements of Cr, Mn, and Ni for a sample of the GC population in NGC 5128 and find consistency with the overall trends observed in the MW, with a slight enhancement (<0.1 dex) in the Fe-peak abundances measured in the NGC 5128.

1 INTRODUCTION

There is a bewildering variety of properties in the galaxies we currently observe in the universe. The differences between these objects range from morphology, luminosity, and colour to star formation histories, chemical composition, and kinematics. In order to fully understand how galaxies in our universe evolve, we need to study in detail galaxies of different Hubble types, not just our own.

A very powerful tool to understand the evolution of galaxies is the study of their chemical abundances as a function of time. More specifically, one can obtain a detailed picture of the evolution of galaxies by looking closely at the abundance patterns of different elements observed in various stellar populations. Considering that the chemical composition of the gas reservoirs that form stars is preserved in their atmospheres, one can extract an immense amount of information through the analysis of stars of different ages. Past studies have shown that the stellar abundance ratios can constrain initial mass functions (IMFs) and star formation rates (SFRs, McWilliam 1997; Matteucci 2003).

It is believed that type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) are the primary sources of Fe and Fe-peak elements in the Galaxy (Nomoto, Iwamoto & Kishimoto 1997). Additionally, it has been established that type II supernovae (SNe II) are instead responsible for the creation of most of the α-elements (O, Mg, Si, S, Ca, and Ti; Woosley & Weaver 1995).

One of the most widely used diagnostics of IMF and SFR is the abundance ratio of α-elements to Fe, [α/Fe]. A top-heavy IMF could lead to enhanced [α/Fe] ratios along with high average metallicities (Matteucci & Brocato 1990). However, similar enhancements in the [α/Fe] ratios can also be the result of a rapid burst of star formation enriching the gas to high metallicities. In the case of our own Milky Way (MW), the enhancement of α-elements in old stellar populations points at a starburst system (Worthey 1998; Matteucci 2003).

Given our proximity to stars in the MW, high-resolution spectroscopy has allowed for abundance studies that provide an incredibly detailed picture of the nucleosynthetic history of our Galaxy. Individual stellar abundances within the MW have assisted in identifying the location and substructures of different populations (e.g. Venn et al. 2004; Pritzl, Venn & Irwin 2005; Reddy, Lambert & Allende Prieto 2006). Even though a limited number of extragalactic abundances of stars in nearby systems, such as the Magellanic Clouds and dwarf galaxies, are also available (e.g. Wolf 1973; Venn 1999; Shetrone, Bolte & Stetson 1999; Tolstoy et al. 2003), to better understand the episodes of star formation in different galaxy types and masses, detailed abundances far beyond the MW and its neighbours in the Local Group are needed.

Most of the abundance work beyond the Local Group has been limited by the difficulty in measuring reliable abundances. The majority of the extragalactic (outside of the Local Group) metallicity and abundance measurements come from studies of H ii regions in star-forming galaxies (Searle 1971; Lee, Salzer & Melbourne 2004; Stasińska 2005). A known issue with such methods is apparent once we compare the metallicities inferred from different diagnostics. Studies have noticed differences in the inferred metallicities as high as ∼0.7 dex (Kennicutt et al. 2003; Bresolin 2008; Kewley & Ellison 2008; López-Sánchez et al. 2012). Additionally, H ii region abundances mainly probe the present-day gas composition, and one cannot access any information on the past evolution of the host galaxy.

For galaxies other than star-forming, different methods are used to study their composition, and star formation histories. For early-type galaxies, several extensive studies have been conducted using absorption line indices as their main resource. Thomas et al. (2005) studied the stellar properties of 124 early-type galaxies deriving metallicities, [α/Fe] ratios, and ages using absorption line indices as well as stellar population models. They find that all three, age, metallicity, and [α/Fe] abundance ratio, correlate with the mass of the galaxy. These results, especially those of the [α/Fe]–mass relation had been anticipated before the work of Thomas et al. (2005) by Worthey, Faber & González (1992), Fisher, Franx & Illingworth (1995), and Kuntschner (2000), amongst others, and verified by Trager et al. (2000), Proctor & Sansom (2002), and Thomas, Maraston & Bender (2002) through stellar population models. Overall, this relation between [α/Fe] and mass observed in earlier studies is consistent with a scenario where higher effective yields from SNe II are expected and observed in more massive galaxies (>1011 M).

One of the main challenges in obtaining detailed abundances of individual stars in galaxies outside of the Local Group is the fact that at larger distances stars become too faint for this type of analysis. In order to overcome this obstacle, studies are now focusing on star clusters, where one of the assumptions is that the individual populations of stars consist of objects of the same age, and are chemically homogenous. The study of integrated-light observations has allowed for a significant advancement in the field of chemical evolution of distant galaxies. Given that the integrated-light spectra of most star clusters are broadened by several km s−1, one can observe star clusters at much higher resolution (R =20 000–30 000) than galaxies, allowing for the detection of weak lines (15 mÅ). Studies of star clusters, mainly globular clusters (GCs), have shown that these objects trace the properties of the different field star populations in their host galaxies (Colucci et al. 2013; Sakari et al. 2015). More specifically, detailed properties such as metallicity, age, and abundances are powerful tools for constraining theories of GC and galaxy formation (Brodie & Strader 2006).

One of the major highlights in the studies of extragalactic GCs is the presence of subpopulations with two main components, metal poor and metal rich. Until the early 2000s, most of the spectroscopic analysis exploring extragalactic GCs utilized Lick/image dissector scanner indices (Burstein et al. 1984; Worthey et al. 1994; Trager et al. 1998). This technique was originally developed to study the absorption features in low-resolution observations at wavelengths of ∼4000–6400 Å of early-type galaxies to measure the properties of their stellar populations. More optimal methods based on the index system were later developed to be more applicable to GC studies. The bulk of extragalactic spectroscopic measurements of metallicities, ages, and [α/Fe] ratios have been inferred mainly by measuring Lick indices. One of the most extensive and systematic studies of extragalactic GC systems was published by Strader et al. (2005) and spanned a broad range of galaxies from dwarfs to ellipticals. This work showed that both GC subpopulations, metal poor and metal rich, have mean ages similar to those seen in the MW GC system with the implication that the bulk of star formation in spheroids occurred at early ages (z > 2).

The general expectation regarding the metal-poor and metal-rich populations of GCs in external galaxies is that the former would show supersolar [α/Fe] ratios given that their formation took place in the early universe when a substantial metal enrichment was yet to happen. Several studies of extragalactic metal-poor GCs appear to have [α/Fe] ≲ 0 (Olsen et al. 2004; Pierce et al. 2005), while others show enhanced [α/Fe]. On the other hand, a study of GCs in early-type galaxies by Puzia et al. (2005), using Lick indices to measure ages, metallicities, and [α/Fe] abundances leads them to conclude that [α/Fe] ratios are on average supersolar with a mean value of +0.47 ± 0.06 dex which points at short star formation time-scales (∼1 Gyr). They also conclude that the progenitor cloud forming these GCs in early-type galaxies would need to have been predominantly enriched by yields from SNe II. The discrepancy between results obtained from different studies of early-type galaxies could be caused by the uncertainties in the simple stellar population (SSP) models used in combination with the wide Lick index bandpasses, making the abundance ratio measurements highly uncertain (Brodie & Strader 2006).

McWilliam & Bernstein (2008) developed a technique to study individual abundances of GCs through the analysis of their integrated light. Their method requires high-resolution observations (R=30 000) and combines information of the Hertzsprung–Russell diagrams of the GC in question, stellar atmospheric models, and synthetic spectra. This technique has been tested and applied to GCs in the MW and the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC, McWilliam & Bernstein 2008; Cameron 2009; Colucci et al. 2011), and at relatively larger distances (M31 at ∼ 780 kpc, Colucci et al. 2009; Colucci, Bernstein & Cohen 2014; Colucci, Bernstein & McWilliam 2016).

Similar to the concept of McWilliam & Bernstein (2008), Larsen et al. (2012, hereafter L12) created a high-resolution integrated-light technique to measure abundances of star clusters. In contrast to the technique of McWilliam & Bernstein (2008), the method of L12 mainly relies on spectral synthesis and full spectral fitting. Abundance measurements are obtained by fitting relatively broad wavelength ranges containing multiple lines of the element in question. The method of L12 has been used to measure chemical abundances of old stellar populations in the MW, and several dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxies (Larsen et al. 2012, 2014; Larsen, Brodie & Strader 2017).

Although the L12 technique was developed using high-dispersion spectroscopic observations, we extended the L12 method to intermediate-resolution spectra (R < 10 000) in Hernandez et al. (2017, 2018). In these studies, we measured detailed abundances of two young massive clusters (YMCs) and overall metallicities of eight YMCs in galaxies ∼5 Mpc away. With techniques like L12 where one is able to study stellar populations in a broad range of ages, from old GCs to young populations (YMCs), and with a slightly less limited spectral resolution range, we can now investigate the chemical evolution of galaxies through a much larger window in space and time than in past studies.

Being the nearest giant early-type galaxy to the MW, NGC 5128 (Centaurus A) is an ideal target to measure detailed abundances from integrated-light spectra of its GCs. In spite of being the nearest giant early-type galaxy, NGC 5128 is still located at a distance of 3.8 Mpc from our Galaxy (Harris, Rejkuba & Harris 2010). Colucci et al. (2013) initiated a study of the chemical composition of the GC system of NGC 5128 measuring Fe and Ca abundances of 10 different clusters. In their work, Colucci et al. (2013) measured Fe abundances with ranges of −1.6 < [Fe/H] < −0.2 dex. A noticeable result from this work was the enhanced [Ca/Fe] ratio for metallicities of [Fe/H] < −0.4 dex, which appeared higher than the average values for the GCs in the MW and M31 of the same metallicities. These results implied a different star formation history for NGC 5128 compared to those from the MW and M31.

We perform a detailed abundance analysis on a sample of 20 star clusters distributed throughout NGC 5128. Using the L12 method, along with intermediate-resolution observations, we measure abundances of light (Na) and α elements (Mg, Ca, and Ti), as well as Fe-peak (Cr, Mn, and Ni). This paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, we describe the science observations and data reduction. In Sections 3 and 4, we present the analysis method and results, respectively. Section 5 is used to discuss our findings, and we list our conclusions in Section 6.

2 OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION

In this work, we exploit the data taken as part of the Very Large Telescope (VLT) programme 085.B-0107(A) observing 25 bright star clusters in NGC 5128. The exposures are taken with the X-Shooter single target spectrograph (Vernet et al. 2011). The instrument has a broad wavelength coverage, providing data between 3000 and 24 800 Å. X-Shooter's extensive wavelength coverage is possible through its three spectroscopic arms. Each of these arms, ultraviolet-blue (UVB), visible (VIS), and near-IR (NIR), has a full set of optimized optics and detectors. The resolution of the instrument is mainly controlled by the slit width, with resolutions ranging from R = 3000 to 17 000. Programme 085.B-0107(A) was executed in 2010 April using slit widths 0.8 arcsec (R ∼6200), 0.7 arcsec (R ∼11 000), and 0.6 arcsec (R ∼6200) for UVB, VIS, and NIR arm, respectively. The data were taken using the standard nodding mode following an ABBA pattern.

Targets with magnitudes brighter than V ∼ 19 were selected from the spectroscopically confirmed GC sample by Beasley et al. (2008). This means that our cluster sample mainly covers the brightest component of the GC system in NGC 5128. In Fig. 1, we show in blue circles the full GC sample of Beasley et al. (2008), plotting the V magnitudes as a function of metallicity. We indicate with red stars the cluster sample analysed in this work. In Table 1, we list the target names, coordinates, exposure times, and signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios for the different arms. The S/N values are calculated using wavelength windows of 4550–4750 Å for the UVB, 7350–7500 Å for the VIS data, and 10 400–10 600 Å for the NIR data. We point out that given the low S/N in the NIR data, the work done in this paper focuses on the X-Shooter observations taken with the UVB and VIS arm only. In Fig. 2, we mark the star clusters analysed in this paper.

Top panel: V magnitudes as a function of spectroscopic metallicities as measured by Beasley et al. (2008). Blue circles and red stars show the full GC study by Beasley et al. (2008) and the sample studied in this work, respectively. Bottom panel: metallicity distribution (bin widths of ∼ 0.13 dex) for the GC system in NGC 5128.
Figure 1.

Top panel: V magnitudes as a function of spectroscopic metallicities as measured by Beasley et al. (2008). Blue circles and red stars show the full GC study by Beasley et al. (2008) and the sample studied in this work, respectively. Bottom panel: metallicity distribution (bin widths of ∼ 0.13 dex) for the GC system in NGC 5128.

Colour composite image from the DSS2 optical healpix survey, including ∼0.6 and ∼0.4 $\rm{\mu m}$ bands. Green squares locate the clusters studied as part of this work.
Figure 2.

Colour composite image from the DSS2 optical healpix survey, including ∼0.6 and ∼0.4 |$\rm{\mu m}$| bands. Green squares locate the clusters studied as part of this work.

Table 1.

X-Shooter observations.

ClusterRADec.texp (s)S/N (pixel−1)
(J2000)(J2000)UVBVISNIRUVBVISNIR
AAT117062201.378408−42.837181800.01780.01800.029.134.013.5
HGHH-04201.256648−43.157351800.01780.01800.012.318.17.2
HGHH-06201.342347−43.045291800.01780.01800.014.619.28.6
HGHH-07201.521448−42.942231800.01780.01800.025.929.412.0
HGHH-11201.228781−43.02231800.01780.01800.016.922.410.7
HGHH-17201.416499−42.932681800.01780.01800.024.328.111.5
HGHH-21201.470672−43.095951800.01780.01800.018.522.79.0
HGHH-23201.476303−42.990241800.01780.01800.028.639.624.0
HGHH-29201.167061−43.301981800.01780.01800.012.120.010.6
HGHH-34201.41993−43.35321800.01780.01800.013.216.77.9
HGHH-40200.927402−43.160271800.01780.01800.08.811.13.4
HH-080200.909807−42.772311800.01780.01800.014.917.15.6
HH-096201.088942−43.042871800.01780.01800.018.521.58.2
HHH86-30201.225916−42.889511800.01780.01800.031.237.919.8
HHH86-39201.674945−43.128461800.01780.01800.032.034.913.5
K-029201.287304−42.982861800.01780.01800.017.624.111.5
K-034201.293745−42.892161800.01780.01800.020.426.212.5
K-163201.416752−43.083281800.01780.01800.027.231.614.2
VHH81-03201.241579−42.935621800.01780.01800.018.824.713.9
VHH81-05201.316943−42.882181800.01780.01800.020.622.07.5
ClusterRADec.texp (s)S/N (pixel−1)
(J2000)(J2000)UVBVISNIRUVBVISNIR
AAT117062201.378408−42.837181800.01780.01800.029.134.013.5
HGHH-04201.256648−43.157351800.01780.01800.012.318.17.2
HGHH-06201.342347−43.045291800.01780.01800.014.619.28.6
HGHH-07201.521448−42.942231800.01780.01800.025.929.412.0
HGHH-11201.228781−43.02231800.01780.01800.016.922.410.7
HGHH-17201.416499−42.932681800.01780.01800.024.328.111.5
HGHH-21201.470672−43.095951800.01780.01800.018.522.79.0
HGHH-23201.476303−42.990241800.01780.01800.028.639.624.0
HGHH-29201.167061−43.301981800.01780.01800.012.120.010.6
HGHH-34201.41993−43.35321800.01780.01800.013.216.77.9
HGHH-40200.927402−43.160271800.01780.01800.08.811.13.4
HH-080200.909807−42.772311800.01780.01800.014.917.15.6
HH-096201.088942−43.042871800.01780.01800.018.521.58.2
HHH86-30201.225916−42.889511800.01780.01800.031.237.919.8
HHH86-39201.674945−43.128461800.01780.01800.032.034.913.5
K-029201.287304−42.982861800.01780.01800.017.624.111.5
K-034201.293745−42.892161800.01780.01800.020.426.212.5
K-163201.416752−43.083281800.01780.01800.027.231.614.2
VHH81-03201.241579−42.935621800.01780.01800.018.824.713.9
VHH81-05201.316943−42.882181800.01780.01800.020.622.07.5
Table 1.

X-Shooter observations.

ClusterRADec.texp (s)S/N (pixel−1)
(J2000)(J2000)UVBVISNIRUVBVISNIR
AAT117062201.378408−42.837181800.01780.01800.029.134.013.5
HGHH-04201.256648−43.157351800.01780.01800.012.318.17.2
HGHH-06201.342347−43.045291800.01780.01800.014.619.28.6
HGHH-07201.521448−42.942231800.01780.01800.025.929.412.0
HGHH-11201.228781−43.02231800.01780.01800.016.922.410.7
HGHH-17201.416499−42.932681800.01780.01800.024.328.111.5
HGHH-21201.470672−43.095951800.01780.01800.018.522.79.0
HGHH-23201.476303−42.990241800.01780.01800.028.639.624.0
HGHH-29201.167061−43.301981800.01780.01800.012.120.010.6
HGHH-34201.41993−43.35321800.01780.01800.013.216.77.9
HGHH-40200.927402−43.160271800.01780.01800.08.811.13.4
HH-080200.909807−42.772311800.01780.01800.014.917.15.6
HH-096201.088942−43.042871800.01780.01800.018.521.58.2
HHH86-30201.225916−42.889511800.01780.01800.031.237.919.8
HHH86-39201.674945−43.128461800.01780.01800.032.034.913.5
K-029201.287304−42.982861800.01780.01800.017.624.111.5
K-034201.293745−42.892161800.01780.01800.020.426.212.5
K-163201.416752−43.083281800.01780.01800.027.231.614.2
VHH81-03201.241579−42.935621800.01780.01800.018.824.713.9
VHH81-05201.316943−42.882181800.01780.01800.020.622.07.5
ClusterRADec.texp (s)S/N (pixel−1)
(J2000)(J2000)UVBVISNIRUVBVISNIR
AAT117062201.378408−42.837181800.01780.01800.029.134.013.5
HGHH-04201.256648−43.157351800.01780.01800.012.318.17.2
HGHH-06201.342347−43.045291800.01780.01800.014.619.28.6
HGHH-07201.521448−42.942231800.01780.01800.025.929.412.0
HGHH-11201.228781−43.02231800.01780.01800.016.922.410.7
HGHH-17201.416499−42.932681800.01780.01800.024.328.111.5
HGHH-21201.470672−43.095951800.01780.01800.018.522.79.0
HGHH-23201.476303−42.990241800.01780.01800.028.639.624.0
HGHH-29201.167061−43.301981800.01780.01800.012.120.010.6
HGHH-34201.41993−43.35321800.01780.01800.013.216.77.9
HGHH-40200.927402−43.160271800.01780.01800.08.811.13.4
HH-080200.909807−42.772311800.01780.01800.014.917.15.6
HH-096201.088942−43.042871800.01780.01800.018.521.58.2
HHH86-30201.225916−42.889511800.01780.01800.031.237.919.8
HHH86-39201.674945−43.128461800.01780.01800.032.034.913.5
K-029201.287304−42.982861800.01780.01800.017.624.111.5
K-034201.293745−42.892161800.01780.01800.020.426.212.5
K-163201.416752−43.083281800.01780.01800.027.231.614.2
VHH81-03201.241579−42.935621800.01780.01800.018.824.713.9
VHH81-05201.316943−42.882181800.01780.01800.020.622.07.5

Using the public release of the X-Shooter pipeline (v2.5.2) along with the European Southern Observatory (ESO) Recipe Execution Tool (esorex) v3.11.1, we perform the basic data reduction steps, including bias and dark corrections, flat-fielding, sky subtraction, and wavelength calibration. We take the 2D calibrated exposures and extract the science spectrum using idl routines by Chen et al. (2014). The code was developed based on optimal extraction principles described in Horne (1986). Once the 1D spectrum is extracted, the code combines the individual orders using the variance-weighted average for overlapping spectral regions. The 1D spectra are flux calibrated using the spectrophotometric standard Feige 110 observed close in time to the science frames. We use the pipeline routine xsh_respon_slit_offset to create response curves for the individual exposures. The response curves use the same bias and master flat frames as those applied to the corresponding science observations, and are corrected for exposure time and atmospheric extinction. It is important to apply the same flat-field frames for both the science and the response curves in order to remove any contemporaneous flat-field features. After the flux calibration, we visually inspect the 1D spectra and find good flux agreement between the UVB and VIS arm. We note that in most of the targets observed in this program, we see strong dichroic features at wavelengths <5700 Å (in the VIS arm). These dichroic features tend to appear in the extracted 1D spectra of the X-Shooter VIS data, with their exact wavelength position varying from exposure to exposure making it rather difficult to remove entirely (Chen et al. 2014). Although our abundance analysis does not require accurate flux calibration, these dichroic features can artificially modify not only the continuum, but also the depth of the intrinsic spectral lines. Given the nature of the dichroic features, we exclude most of the VIS wavelengths <5700 Å in our analysis.

Telluric absorption bands strongly affect our VIS exposures. Observations with wavelengths between 5800–6100 Å, 6800–7400 Å, 7550–7750 Å, 7800–8500 Å, and 8850–10 000 Å, are mainly contaminated by these absorption bands. We correct for this contamination from the Earth's atmosphere using the routines and telluric library developed by the X-Shooter Spectral Library team. Chen et al. (2014) created a correction method based on principal component analysis which depends on their carefully designed telluric library. We apply this correction which reconstructs and removes the strongest telluric absorption as needed. Although we correct our observations for telluric contamination, in our analysis we aim to avoid these regions. We mainly focus our abundance analysis in the UVB wavelengths 4400–5200 Å, and VIS wavelength windows 5670–5700 Å, 6100–6800 Å, 7400–7550 Å, and 8500–8850 Å.

3 ABUNDANCE ANALYSIS

In this work, we make use of the integrated-light analysis tool developed and tested by L12. The L12 technique was originally created for high-dispersion observations of GCs, however in Hernandez et al. (2017), we showed that this method can also be used for detailed abundance analysis of intermediate-resolution observations. The original method is described in detail in the work of Larsen et al. (2012, 2014). The main idea involves an iterative process where the chemical abundances are determined by fitting synthetic modelled spectra to the integrated-light observations, varying the abundances on each iteration. To accurately model the observations one needs to account for every evolutionary stage present in the star cluster in question. We compute a single model atmosphere, which is then used to generate a high-resolution (R ∼ 500 000) synthetic spectrum for each stellar type. The individual model spectra are then combined on to a single synthetic integrated-light spectrum. We note that when co-adding the spectra we use appropriate weights accounting for the number of stars of a specific type based on a Salpeter IMF (see Section 3.1 for a detailed description). The synthetic integrated-light spectra are smoothed to match the resolution of the X-Shooter observations, and then compared to the science data.

In the original work of L12, the software made use of atlas9 models along with synthe codes to compute the model atmospheres and synthetic spectra (Kurucz 1970; Kurucz & Furenlid 1979; Kurucz & Avret 1981). atlas9 is a 1D plane-parallel local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) atmospheric modelling software by Robert Kurucz. However, these plane-parallel models are less ideal for cooler stars. In our analysis in addition to using atlas9 and synthe codes, we also use marcs atmospheric models (Gustafsson et al. 2008) paired with turbospectrum to create the synthetic spectra (Plez 2012). In contrast to atlas9, marcs are 1D spherical LTE models. We download a grid of pre-computed marcs models from their official website,1 and allow the code to select the closest model to match the different stellar types. We use atlas9/synthe software for stars with Teff > 5000K and marcs/turbospectrum for stars with Teff < 5000K, similar to what was done in Hernandez et al. (2018). Our analysis is based on the Solar composition from Grevesse & Sauval (1998).

The abundance analysis done in this paper is entirely based on LTE modelling. We note that we do not apply any non-LTE (NLTE) corrections as these are rather complex for integrated-light work given their dependence on the stellar properties of individual stars. In general NLTE corrections for some α-elements are predicted to range between −0.4 and −0.1 dex (Bergemann et al. 2015).

3.1 Theoretical+empirical stellar parameters

The distance to NGC 5128 makes obtaining colour–magnitude diagrams (CMDs) a complicated task. Given that CMDs for our star-cluster sample are not available, we instead rely on theoretical isochrones for the analysis. The selection of the atmospheric models is based on the theoretical α-enhanced isochrones by the Dartmouth group (Dotter et al. 2007) which account for main sequence and red giant branch (RGB) stars. We note that these isochrones exclude both, the horizontal branch (HB) and asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stages. For this reason, we opt for combining the theoretical isochrones with empirical HB and AGB observations from the survey of Galactic GCs using the Advanced Camera for Surveys on board the Hubble Space Telescope by Sarajedini et al. (2007).

For the initial selection of isochrones and appropriate empirical HB and AGB data, we adopt the ages and metallicities from Beasley et al. (2008) listed in Table 2. We extract the stellar parameters from the individual isochrones assuming an IMF following a power law with a Salpeter (1955) exponent, α = −2.35. We adopt the luminosity limit of L12 where we only include stars brighter than MV = +9. L12 points out that including stars fainter than this limit modifies the overall metallicities by <0.1 dex.

Table 2.

Star-cluster properties from the literature.

ClusterAgea[m/H]avrvbσ1DcEmpirical HB and AGBd
(Gyr)(dex)(km s−1)(km s−1)
AAT11706210.00−1.10412 ± 71NGC 0362
HGHH-0410.00−1.63724 ± 4614.0 ± 0.46NGC 6093
HGHH-0610.00−1.10790 ± 44NGC 0362
HGHH-0711.89−1.03593 ± 51NGC 0362
HGHH-118.41−0.43721 ± 3516.7 ± 1.5NGC 6838
HGHH-1710.00−0.98773 ± 4620.8 ± 2.9NGC 0362
HGHH-2111.22−1.10495 ± 3820.0 ± 1.4NGC 0362
HGHH-2310.59−0.48684 ± 2441.5 ± 3.7NGC 6838
HGHH-2911.22−0.45743 ± 3417.6 ± 1.8NGC 6838
HGHH-348.41−0.45676 ± 27NGC 6838
HGHH-4010.00−1.25443 ± 48NGC 0362
HH-08010.00−1.58497 ± 33NGC 6093
HH-09610.00−1.38541 ± 54NGC 0362
HHH86-305.01−0.38811 ± 32Palomar 1
HHH86-3911.89−0.48464 ± 42NGC 0362
K-02911.89−0.75249 ± 59NGC 0104
K-03411.22−0.53677 ± 44NGC 0104
K-16311.89−0.98487 ± 51NGC 0362
VHH81-035.31−0.20591 ± 37Palomar 1
VHH81-0510.00−1.55563 ± 41NGC 6093
ClusterAgea[m/H]avrvbσ1DcEmpirical HB and AGBd
(Gyr)(dex)(km s−1)(km s−1)
AAT11706210.00−1.10412 ± 71NGC 0362
HGHH-0410.00−1.63724 ± 4614.0 ± 0.46NGC 6093
HGHH-0610.00−1.10790 ± 44NGC 0362
HGHH-0711.89−1.03593 ± 51NGC 0362
HGHH-118.41−0.43721 ± 3516.7 ± 1.5NGC 6838
HGHH-1710.00−0.98773 ± 4620.8 ± 2.9NGC 0362
HGHH-2111.22−1.10495 ± 3820.0 ± 1.4NGC 0362
HGHH-2310.59−0.48684 ± 2441.5 ± 3.7NGC 6838
HGHH-2911.22−0.45743 ± 3417.6 ± 1.8NGC 6838
HGHH-348.41−0.45676 ± 27NGC 6838
HGHH-4010.00−1.25443 ± 48NGC 0362
HH-08010.00−1.58497 ± 33NGC 6093
HH-09610.00−1.38541 ± 54NGC 0362
HHH86-305.01−0.38811 ± 32Palomar 1
HHH86-3911.89−0.48464 ± 42NGC 0362
K-02911.89−0.75249 ± 59NGC 0104
K-03411.22−0.53677 ± 44NGC 0104
K-16311.89−0.98487 ± 51NGC 0362
VHH81-035.31−0.20591 ± 37Palomar 1
VHH81-0510.00−1.55563 ± 41NGC 6093

Notes. aSSP ages and metallicities from Beasley et al. (2008).

bValues extracted from the work of Beasley et al. (2008).

cLine-of-sight velocity dispersion from Taylor et al. (2010) and Colucci et al. (2013).

dGalactic GC observations by Sarajedini et al. (2007) used to represent the HB and AGB stellar stages.

Table 2.

Star-cluster properties from the literature.

ClusterAgea[m/H]avrvbσ1DcEmpirical HB and AGBd
(Gyr)(dex)(km s−1)(km s−1)
AAT11706210.00−1.10412 ± 71NGC 0362
HGHH-0410.00−1.63724 ± 4614.0 ± 0.46NGC 6093
HGHH-0610.00−1.10790 ± 44NGC 0362
HGHH-0711.89−1.03593 ± 51NGC 0362
HGHH-118.41−0.43721 ± 3516.7 ± 1.5NGC 6838
HGHH-1710.00−0.98773 ± 4620.8 ± 2.9NGC 0362
HGHH-2111.22−1.10495 ± 3820.0 ± 1.4NGC 0362
HGHH-2310.59−0.48684 ± 2441.5 ± 3.7NGC 6838
HGHH-2911.22−0.45743 ± 3417.6 ± 1.8NGC 6838
HGHH-348.41−0.45676 ± 27NGC 6838
HGHH-4010.00−1.25443 ± 48NGC 0362
HH-08010.00−1.58497 ± 33NGC 6093
HH-09610.00−1.38541 ± 54NGC 0362
HHH86-305.01−0.38811 ± 32Palomar 1
HHH86-3911.89−0.48464 ± 42NGC 0362
K-02911.89−0.75249 ± 59NGC 0104
K-03411.22−0.53677 ± 44NGC 0104
K-16311.89−0.98487 ± 51NGC 0362
VHH81-035.31−0.20591 ± 37Palomar 1
VHH81-0510.00−1.55563 ± 41NGC 6093
ClusterAgea[m/H]avrvbσ1DcEmpirical HB and AGBd
(Gyr)(dex)(km s−1)(km s−1)
AAT11706210.00−1.10412 ± 71NGC 0362
HGHH-0410.00−1.63724 ± 4614.0 ± 0.46NGC 6093
HGHH-0610.00−1.10790 ± 44NGC 0362
HGHH-0711.89−1.03593 ± 51NGC 0362
HGHH-118.41−0.43721 ± 3516.7 ± 1.5NGC 6838
HGHH-1710.00−0.98773 ± 4620.8 ± 2.9NGC 0362
HGHH-2111.22−1.10495 ± 3820.0 ± 1.4NGC 0362
HGHH-2310.59−0.48684 ± 2441.5 ± 3.7NGC 6838
HGHH-2911.22−0.45743 ± 3417.6 ± 1.8NGC 6838
HGHH-348.41−0.45676 ± 27NGC 6838
HGHH-4010.00−1.25443 ± 48NGC 0362
HH-08010.00−1.58497 ± 33NGC 6093
HH-09610.00−1.38541 ± 54NGC 0362
HHH86-305.01−0.38811 ± 32Palomar 1
HHH86-3911.89−0.48464 ± 42NGC 0362
K-02911.89−0.75249 ± 59NGC 0104
K-03411.22−0.53677 ± 44NGC 0104
K-16311.89−0.98487 ± 51NGC 0362
VHH81-035.31−0.20591 ± 37Palomar 1
VHH81-0510.00−1.55563 ± 41NGC 6093

Notes. aSSP ages and metallicities from Beasley et al. (2008).

bValues extracted from the work of Beasley et al. (2008).

cLine-of-sight velocity dispersion from Taylor et al. (2010) and Colucci et al. (2013).

dGalactic GC observations by Sarajedini et al. (2007) used to represent the HB and AGB stellar stages.

We also choose a CMD with similar age and metallicity as the ones listed in Table 2 and extract the photometry for stars in the HB and the AGB. For each of the GCs in NGC 5128, we list the Galactic GC used to model the HB and AGB populations in the last column of Table 2. The photometry is corrected for foreground extinction using the colour excess values, E(B − V), from the latest edition of the Harris (1996) catalogue (version 2010). Most of the distance estimates used in the photometry come from the work of the 2010 edition of Harris (1996) and van den Bosch et al. (2006). For the HB and AGB stars, we derive values for the Teff and bolometric corrections from the V − I colours using the colour–Teff transformation based on models by Kurucz (Castelli, Gratton & Kurucz 1997). Additionally, the surface gravities, log g, are inferred using the relation
(1)
When combining the isochrone-based CMDs with the empirical HB and AGB data, similar to the approach of Larsen et al. (2017), we estimate the weights of the empirical data by matching the number of RGB stars in the range of 1 < MV < 2 in the theoretical CMD to those present in the empirical CMD.

We also account for the microturbulent velocity component, vt, assigning different values depending on their log g. For stars with log g > 4.5, we adopt a value of vt = 0.5 km s−1 (Takeda et al. 2002). Following the reference points of L12 and Larsen et al. (2017), for 4.0 < log g < 4.5, we assume vt = 1.0 km s−1 and for log g < 1.0, vt = 2.0 km s−1. For values 1.0 < log g < 4.0, we assign microturbulent velocities based on a linear interpolation of vt(log g). Lastly, for HB stars, we assume vt = 1.8 km s−1 (Pilachowski, Sneden & Kraft 1996).

3.2 Smoothing parameter

After the synthetic integrated-light spectrum is produced, we degrade the resolution of the model spectrum from R = 500 000 to R ∼ 6200–11 000 to match the X-Shooter observations. In our analysis, we are able to fit for the best Gaussian dispersion, σsm, which should account for the instrumental resolution (σinst) and the cluster velocity dispersion (σ1D).

As a first step in this analysis, we fit for the radial velocities (vrv) and the best σsm along with the overall metallicity, [Z], processing 200 Å of data at a time. Given that X-Shooter collects data through a multiple-arm system detailed in Section 2, we fit separate σsm for each arm. We scan the UVB wavelength range between 4000 and 5200 Å, and for the VIS arm we use the spectroscopic observations covering wavelengths between 6100 and 8850 Å excluding areas affected by strong telluric absorption.

Using slit widths of 0.5 arcsec for the UVB arm and 0.7 arcsec for the VIS arm, Chen et al. (2014) find that the instrumental resolution in the UVB arm varies between R = 9584 and 7033. In contrast to their findings regarding the UVB observations, the VIS arm showed a constant resolution throughout the wavelength coverage with an average value of R = 10 986, very similar to the X-Shooter stated resolution of R = 11 000.2 Following the results of Chen et al. (2014), we assume that the resolving power follows a Gaussian full width half-maximum, and a constant resolution in the VIS arm with a value of R = 11 000, corresponding to an instrumental velocity dispersion of σinst = 11.58 km s−1.

We estimate the line-of-sight velocity dispersions by subtracting σinst in quadrature from the averaged σsm for the VIS data. We note that the work presented here assumes an instrumental resolution set by the configuration alone, i.e. slit width. In Table 3, we list our inferred radial velocity and the line-of-sight velocity dispersions for each of the clusters in the sample.

Table 3.

Derived velocities.

Clustervrvσ1D
(km s−1)(km s−1)
AAT117062495 ± 420.2 ± 4.4
HGHH-04699 ± 415.7 ± 8.5
HGHH-06845 ± 328.5 ± 3.7
HGHH-07589 ± 324.7 ± 2.5
HGHH-11750 ± 316.6 ± 2.4
HGHH-17777 ± 219.0 ± 1.6
HGHH-21457 ± 317.1 ± 2.5
HGHH-23672 ± 129.2 ± 3.0
HGHH-29721 ± 314.7 ± 1.7
HGHH-34638 ± 410.8 ± 2.8
HGHH-40372 ± 34.7 ± 5.1
HH-080470 ± 312.4 ± 4.0
HH-096610 ± 313.6 ± 5.0
HHH86-30768 ± 322.3 ± 1.7
HHH86-39227 ± 512.5 ± 2.2
K-029629 ± 325.3 ± 1.1
K-034452 ± 214.4 ± 2.1
K-163477 ± 322.2 ± 1.3
VHH81-03553 ± 117.5 ± 2.4
VHH81-05555 ± 310.2 ± 5.3
Clustervrvσ1D
(km s−1)(km s−1)
AAT117062495 ± 420.2 ± 4.4
HGHH-04699 ± 415.7 ± 8.5
HGHH-06845 ± 328.5 ± 3.7
HGHH-07589 ± 324.7 ± 2.5
HGHH-11750 ± 316.6 ± 2.4
HGHH-17777 ± 219.0 ± 1.6
HGHH-21457 ± 317.1 ± 2.5
HGHH-23672 ± 129.2 ± 3.0
HGHH-29721 ± 314.7 ± 1.7
HGHH-34638 ± 410.8 ± 2.8
HGHH-40372 ± 34.7 ± 5.1
HH-080470 ± 312.4 ± 4.0
HH-096610 ± 313.6 ± 5.0
HHH86-30768 ± 322.3 ± 1.7
HHH86-39227 ± 512.5 ± 2.2
K-029629 ± 325.3 ± 1.1
K-034452 ± 214.4 ± 2.1
K-163477 ± 322.2 ± 1.3
VHH81-03553 ± 117.5 ± 2.4
VHH81-05555 ± 310.2 ± 5.3
Table 3.

Derived velocities.

Clustervrvσ1D
(km s−1)(km s−1)
AAT117062495 ± 420.2 ± 4.4
HGHH-04699 ± 415.7 ± 8.5
HGHH-06845 ± 328.5 ± 3.7
HGHH-07589 ± 324.7 ± 2.5
HGHH-11750 ± 316.6 ± 2.4
HGHH-17777 ± 219.0 ± 1.6
HGHH-21457 ± 317.1 ± 2.5
HGHH-23672 ± 129.2 ± 3.0
HGHH-29721 ± 314.7 ± 1.7
HGHH-34638 ± 410.8 ± 2.8
HGHH-40372 ± 34.7 ± 5.1
HH-080470 ± 312.4 ± 4.0
HH-096610 ± 313.6 ± 5.0
HHH86-30768 ± 322.3 ± 1.7
HHH86-39227 ± 512.5 ± 2.2
K-029629 ± 325.3 ± 1.1
K-034452 ± 214.4 ± 2.1
K-163477 ± 322.2 ± 1.3
VHH81-03553 ± 117.5 ± 2.4
VHH81-05555 ± 310.2 ± 5.3
Clustervrvσ1D
(km s−1)(km s−1)
AAT117062495 ± 420.2 ± 4.4
HGHH-04699 ± 415.7 ± 8.5
HGHH-06845 ± 328.5 ± 3.7
HGHH-07589 ± 324.7 ± 2.5
HGHH-11750 ± 316.6 ± 2.4
HGHH-17777 ± 219.0 ± 1.6
HGHH-21457 ± 317.1 ± 2.5
HGHH-23672 ± 129.2 ± 3.0
HGHH-29721 ± 314.7 ± 1.7
HGHH-34638 ± 410.8 ± 2.8
HGHH-40372 ± 34.7 ± 5.1
HH-080470 ± 312.4 ± 4.0
HH-096610 ± 313.6 ± 5.0
HHH86-30768 ± 322.3 ± 1.7
HHH86-39227 ± 512.5 ± 2.2
K-029629 ± 325.3 ± 1.1
K-034452 ± 214.4 ± 2.1
K-163477 ± 322.2 ± 1.3
VHH81-03553 ± 117.5 ± 2.4
VHH81-05555 ± 310.2 ± 5.3

For completeness, in Fig. 3, we compare our inferred velocities, both radial velocity and line-of-sight velocity dispersion, to values in the literature listed in Table 2. The left-hand panel of Fig. 3 shows excellent agreement between our measured radial velocities with those from the work of Beasley et al. (2008) for all 20 GCs. We note that the errors in the radial velocity measurements are determined from the scatter around the mean value, using the standard deviation of the measurements.

Left-hand panel: comparison between radial velocities (vrv) measured in this work and in Beasley et al. (2008). Right-hand panel: comparison between line-of-sight velocity dispersions inferred in this work and those in the work of Taylor et al. (2010) and Colucci et al. (2013). Dashed lines show the line of equal value.
Figure 3.

Left-hand panel: comparison between radial velocities (vrv) measured in this work and in Beasley et al. (2008). Right-hand panel: comparison between line-of-sight velocity dispersions inferred in this work and those in the work of Taylor et al. (2010) and Colucci et al. (2013). Dashed lines show the line of equal value.

In the right-hand panel of Fig. 3, we plot our inferred velocity dispersions against those from the work of Taylor et al. (2010) and Colucci et al. (2013). Unfortunately, literature measurements of σ1D are more limited than vrv. Taylor et al. (2010) measured σ1D for seven GCs in our sample. We find good agreement for all but one GC, HGHH-23, where Taylor et al. (2010) find a significantly higher velocity dispersion. Our value for HGHH-23, however, is in good agreement with that inferred by Rejkuba et al. (2007), σ1D = 30.5 ± 0.2 km s−1, well within the errors of our measured velocity dispersion of σ1D = 29.2 ± 3.0 km s−1.

We point out that although our measurements for σ1D agree well with values in the literature, some of our inferred velocity dispersions are relatively high, when compared to the standard σ1D measured for Galactic GCs. From the latest edition of the Harris (1996) catalogue (version 2010), we see that the highest σ1D values measured in Galactic GCs are around ∼18 km s−1. The velocity dispersion values measured for GCs in NGC 5128 range between 5 ≲ σ1D ≲ 30 km s−1. That being said, we note that the GC system in NGC 5128 is rich and remarkably larger than that of the MW, and in this study, we are probing the brightest GCs in NGC 5128, which could in principle mean that we are looking at the most massive GCs in this early-type galaxy.

3.3 Element spectral windows

As detailed in Hernandez et al. (2017), one of the main challenges in working with integrated-light observations of star clusters is the degree of blending suffered by the different spectral lines. In Hernandez et al. (2017), we created optimized spectral windows tailored for individual elements. The windows were carefully selected to mitigate strong blending based on a series of criteria. For a more detailed discussion of the optimization of the spectral windows, we refer the reader to Hernandez et al. (2017, Section 3.4). Briefly, we create two synthetic spectra using the physical parameters of Arcturus as published by Ramírez & Allende (2011). One of the spectra is generated excluding all lines for the element in question, whereas the second spectrum includes only spectral features for the same element under analysis. Comparing the two spectra, we make a pre-selection of spectral lines with a minimal degree of blending based on the following requirements: (i) from the normalized spectra the depth of the spectral absorption must have a maximum flux of 0.85, and (ii) neighbouring lines closer than ±0.25 Å are excluded. This pre-selection is done automatically using a python script. We continue to inspect the recommended element lines and finalize the wavelength windows which include the majority of the clean lines. We note that for Fe and Ti, we select broader windows as most of the wavelength range is populated by spectral lines of these elements.

4 RESULTS

After correcting for the radial velocities, and once the smoothing parameter (σsm) has been inferred, we fit for the overall metallicity, [Z], keeping σsm fixed. This exercise is performed on each cluster analysing the data in 200 Å intervals. These initial metallicities are only used as a first step, mainly as a scaling factor, before proceeding to measure the individual elements. For wavelength windows of ≥100 Å, we match the continua of the model spectra with those of the observations using a cubic spline with three knots. For spectral windows of <100 Å, we instead use a first-order polynomial to fit the continuum. We initiate the detailed abundance analysis, first measuring Fe. We start with those elements with the highest number of lines throughout the spectral coverage. For this element, we again scan the wavelength range analysing 200 Å at a time, covering wavelengths between 4400 and 8850 Å excluding the noisy arm edges and telluric contaminated regions. In general, we find consistent results throughout the different bins. In Fig. 4, we show the individual Fe abundances for the corresponding wavelength bins for a selected sample. We do not observe any strong trends with wavelength. Additionally, for this same selected sample of GCs, in Figs A1A5, we present element abundances as a function of their corresponding wavelength bin.

Fe abundances as a function of wavelength for a selected sample of GCs in NGC 5128. The grey dashed line shows the inferred [Fe/H] for the corresponding clusters. We present the clusters from top to bottom in order of increasing metallicity.
Figure 4.

Fe abundances as a function of wavelength for a selected sample of GCs in NGC 5128. The grey dashed line shows the inferred [Fe/H] for the corresponding clusters. We present the clusters from top to bottom in order of increasing metallicity.

We continue down the element list measuring Ti, Ca, Mg, Cr, Mn, Ni, and Na, one element at a time. We point out that the L12 code allows for fittings that include multiple elements simultaneously; however, fitting individual elements appears to be slightly more efficient. For each element, we use the tailored wavelength windows optimized following the criteria presented in Section 3.3. As we proceed with the analysis, we keep the measured abundances fixed to their best-fitting value, and continue with the rest of the elements. In Tables A1A20, we show the elements, wavelength bins, best-fitting abundances, and their respective 1σ uncertainties from the χ2 fit. Additionally, in Fig. 5, we show normalized synthesis fits for a selected star-cluster sample covering wavelengths 5000–5200 Å.

Normalized synthesis fits for a selected sample of GCs in NGC 5128. In black, we show the X-Shooter observations. In red, we show the model fit. The individual cluster names are located below the corresponding spectra. We present the clusters from top to bottom in order of increasing metallicity given our results.
Figure 5.

Normalized synthesis fits for a selected sample of GCs in NGC 5128. In black, we show the X-Shooter observations. In red, we show the model fit. The individual cluster names are located below the corresponding spectra. We present the clusters from top to bottom in order of increasing metallicity given our results.

In Tables 4 and 5, we present our final abundances, along with their corresponding errors, σX. The values in these tables are estimates of the weighted average abundances. When calculating these values we assume weights defined as |$w_{\text{i}}= 1/\sigma _{\text{i}}^{2}$|⁠, where σi represents the 1σ errors listed in Tables A1A20. Given that the scatter in the individual measurements is larger than the errors based on the χ2 fits, we believe that the standard deviation, σSTD, appears to be more representative of the actual uncertainties. Therefore, we turn the σSTD into formal errors of the mean abundances following:
(2)
In equation (2), σSTD and N represent the standard deviation and number of bins for the elements in question, respectively.
Table 4.

Derived metallicities.

Cluster[Fe/H] ± σFe
(dex)
AAT117062−1.15 ± 0.04
HGHH-04−1.92 ± 0.06
HGHH-06−0.92 ± 0.02
HGHH-07−1.13 ± 0.03
HGHH-11−0.47 ± 0.05
HGHH-17−1.09 ± 0.03
HGHH-21−0.96 ± 0.04
HGHH-23−0.39 ± 0.04
HGHH-29−0.51 ± 0.03
HGHH-34−0.40 ± 0.03
HGHH-40−1.13 ± 0.04
HH-080−1.62 ± 0.07
HH-096−1.29 ± 0.05
HHH86-30−0.29 ± 0.04
HHH86-39−1.25 ± 0.08
K-029−0.74 ± 0.02
K-034−0.52 ± 0.03
K-163−1.10 ± 0.04
VHH81-03−0.13 ± 0.05
VHH81-05−1.61 ± 0.07
Cluster[Fe/H] ± σFe
(dex)
AAT117062−1.15 ± 0.04
HGHH-04−1.92 ± 0.06
HGHH-06−0.92 ± 0.02
HGHH-07−1.13 ± 0.03
HGHH-11−0.47 ± 0.05
HGHH-17−1.09 ± 0.03
HGHH-21−0.96 ± 0.04
HGHH-23−0.39 ± 0.04
HGHH-29−0.51 ± 0.03
HGHH-34−0.40 ± 0.03
HGHH-40−1.13 ± 0.04
HH-080−1.62 ± 0.07
HH-096−1.29 ± 0.05
HHH86-30−0.29 ± 0.04
HHH86-39−1.25 ± 0.08
K-029−0.74 ± 0.02
K-034−0.52 ± 0.03
K-163−1.10 ± 0.04
VHH81-03−0.13 ± 0.05
VHH81-05−1.61 ± 0.07
Table 4.

Derived metallicities.

Cluster[Fe/H] ± σFe
(dex)
AAT117062−1.15 ± 0.04
HGHH-04−1.92 ± 0.06
HGHH-06−0.92 ± 0.02
HGHH-07−1.13 ± 0.03
HGHH-11−0.47 ± 0.05
HGHH-17−1.09 ± 0.03
HGHH-21−0.96 ± 0.04
HGHH-23−0.39 ± 0.04
HGHH-29−0.51 ± 0.03
HGHH-34−0.40 ± 0.03
HGHH-40−1.13 ± 0.04
HH-080−1.62 ± 0.07
HH-096−1.29 ± 0.05
HHH86-30−0.29 ± 0.04
HHH86-39−1.25 ± 0.08
K-029−0.74 ± 0.02
K-034−0.52 ± 0.03
K-163−1.10 ± 0.04
VHH81-03−0.13 ± 0.05
VHH81-05−1.61 ± 0.07
Cluster[Fe/H] ± σFe
(dex)
AAT117062−1.15 ± 0.04
HGHH-04−1.92 ± 0.06
HGHH-06−0.92 ± 0.02
HGHH-07−1.13 ± 0.03
HGHH-11−0.47 ± 0.05
HGHH-17−1.09 ± 0.03
HGHH-21−0.96 ± 0.04
HGHH-23−0.39 ± 0.04
HGHH-29−0.51 ± 0.03
HGHH-34−0.40 ± 0.03
HGHH-40−1.13 ± 0.04
HH-080−1.62 ± 0.07
HH-096−1.29 ± 0.05
HHH86-30−0.29 ± 0.04
HHH86-39−1.25 ± 0.08
K-029−0.74 ± 0.02
K-034−0.52 ± 0.03
K-163−1.10 ± 0.04
VHH81-03−0.13 ± 0.05
VHH81-05−1.61 ± 0.07
Table 5.

Derived abundances.

Cluster[Mg/Fe] ± σMg[Ca/Fe] ± σCa[Ti/Fe] ± σTi[Na/Fe] ± σNa[Cr/Fe] ± σCr[Mn/Fe] ± σMn[Ni/Fe] ± σNi
(dex)(dex)(dex)(dex)(dex)(dex)(dex)
AAT117062+0.55 ± 0.13+0.25 ± 0.10+0.39 ± 0.14+0.11 ± 0.20−0.08 ± 0.24+0.17 ± 0.07
HGHH-04+0.44 ± 0.17+0.53 ± 0.16+0.51 ± 0.10+0.12 ± 0.20−0.70 ± 0.29+0.04 ± 0.11
HGHH-06+0.64 ± 0.06+0.33 ± 0.16+0.33 ± 0.10+0.16 ± 0.13−0.25 ± 0.29+0.24 ± 0.15
HGHH-07+0.53 ± 0.13+0.48 ± 0.13+0.28 ± 0.10+0.26 ± 0.20+0.08 ± 0.19−0.05 ± 0.28+0.13 ± 0.08
HGHH-11+0.32 ± 0.11−0.09 ± 0.12+0.13 ± 0.15+0.04 ± 0.08−0.12 ± 0.08+0.25 ± 0.29+0.08 ± 0.11
HGHH-17+0.52 ± 0.10+0.44 ± 0.08+0.27 ± 0.05+0.04 ± 0.18+0.17 ± 0.30−0.02 ± 0.17+0.15 ± 0.07
HGHH-21+0.54 ± 0.09+0.31 ± 0.09+0.43 ± 0.11+0.20 ± 0.24+0.17 ± 0.07+0.24 ± 0.19
HGHH-23+0.28 ± 0.14+0.01 ± 0.11+0.05 ± 0.23+0.38 ± 0.08+0.09 ± 0.19+0.13 ± 0.29−0.12 ± 0.18
HGHH-29+0.43 ± 0.06+0.04 ± 0.06+0.28 ± 0.07+0.26 ± 0.29+0.20 ± 0.23+0.12 ± 0.14
HGHH-34+0.35 ± 0.09+0.00 ± 0.06+0.49 ± 0.18+0.02 ± 0.18+0.18 ± 0.06+0.23 ± 0.10
HGHH-40+0.24 ± 0.09+0.19 ± 0.07+0.27 ± 0.25+0.05 ± 0.44−0.13 ± 0.06+0.30 ± 0.32
HH-080+0.18 ± 0.14+0.35 ± 0.09+0.30 ± 0.14+0.04 ± 0.19−0.01 ± 0.18+0.03 ± 0.14
HH-096+0.35 ± 0.22+0.38 ± 0.05+0.27 ± 0.07+0.09 ± 0.12−0.24 ± 0.22+0.14 ± 0.10
HHH86-30+0.29 ± 0.06−0.19 ± 0.13+0.27 ± 0.12+0.26 ± 0.10+0.25 ± 0.17+0.18 ± 0.08+0.10 ± 0.07
HHH86-39+0.12 ± 0.20+0.24 ± 0.25−0.05 ± 0.11+0.13 ± 0.63−0.32 ± 0.26−0.13 ± 0.15
K-029+0.44 ± 0.11+0.16 ± 0.14+0.22 ± 0.12+0.70 ± 0.08+0.15 ± 0.25+0.11 ± 0.50+0.00 ± 0.11
K-034+0.42 ± 0.12−0.01 ± 0.08+0.21 ± 0.06+0.34 ± 0.08+0.25 ± 0.19+0.14 ± 0.03+0.09 ± 0.11
K-163+0.60 ± 0.13+0.43 ± 0.09+0.28 ± 0.06+0.65 ± 0.22+0.02 ± 0.19−0.21 ± 0.17+0.09 ± 0.13
VHH81-03+0.22 ± 0.08−0.17 ± 0.16+0.12 ± 0.10+0.14 ± 0.29+0.21 ± 0.29+0.10 ± 0.10
VHH81-05+0.25 ± 0.12+0.54 ± 0.09+0.55 ± 0.17−0.11 ± 0.61−0.19 ± 0.06−0.40 ± 0.11
Cluster[Mg/Fe] ± σMg[Ca/Fe] ± σCa[Ti/Fe] ± σTi[Na/Fe] ± σNa[Cr/Fe] ± σCr[Mn/Fe] ± σMn[Ni/Fe] ± σNi
(dex)(dex)(dex)(dex)(dex)(dex)(dex)
AAT117062+0.55 ± 0.13+0.25 ± 0.10+0.39 ± 0.14+0.11 ± 0.20−0.08 ± 0.24+0.17 ± 0.07
HGHH-04+0.44 ± 0.17+0.53 ± 0.16+0.51 ± 0.10+0.12 ± 0.20−0.70 ± 0.29+0.04 ± 0.11
HGHH-06+0.64 ± 0.06+0.33 ± 0.16+0.33 ± 0.10+0.16 ± 0.13−0.25 ± 0.29+0.24 ± 0.15
HGHH-07+0.53 ± 0.13+0.48 ± 0.13+0.28 ± 0.10+0.26 ± 0.20+0.08 ± 0.19−0.05 ± 0.28+0.13 ± 0.08
HGHH-11+0.32 ± 0.11−0.09 ± 0.12+0.13 ± 0.15+0.04 ± 0.08−0.12 ± 0.08+0.25 ± 0.29+0.08 ± 0.11
HGHH-17+0.52 ± 0.10+0.44 ± 0.08+0.27 ± 0.05+0.04 ± 0.18+0.17 ± 0.30−0.02 ± 0.17+0.15 ± 0.07
HGHH-21+0.54 ± 0.09+0.31 ± 0.09+0.43 ± 0.11+0.20 ± 0.24+0.17 ± 0.07+0.24 ± 0.19
HGHH-23+0.28 ± 0.14+0.01 ± 0.11+0.05 ± 0.23+0.38 ± 0.08+0.09 ± 0.19+0.13 ± 0.29−0.12 ± 0.18
HGHH-29+0.43 ± 0.06+0.04 ± 0.06+0.28 ± 0.07+0.26 ± 0.29+0.20 ± 0.23+0.12 ± 0.14
HGHH-34+0.35 ± 0.09+0.00 ± 0.06+0.49 ± 0.18+0.02 ± 0.18+0.18 ± 0.06+0.23 ± 0.10
HGHH-40+0.24 ± 0.09+0.19 ± 0.07+0.27 ± 0.25+0.05 ± 0.44−0.13 ± 0.06+0.30 ± 0.32
HH-080+0.18 ± 0.14+0.35 ± 0.09+0.30 ± 0.14+0.04 ± 0.19−0.01 ± 0.18+0.03 ± 0.14
HH-096+0.35 ± 0.22+0.38 ± 0.05+0.27 ± 0.07+0.09 ± 0.12−0.24 ± 0.22+0.14 ± 0.10
HHH86-30+0.29 ± 0.06−0.19 ± 0.13+0.27 ± 0.12+0.26 ± 0.10+0.25 ± 0.17+0.18 ± 0.08+0.10 ± 0.07
HHH86-39+0.12 ± 0.20+0.24 ± 0.25−0.05 ± 0.11+0.13 ± 0.63−0.32 ± 0.26−0.13 ± 0.15
K-029+0.44 ± 0.11+0.16 ± 0.14+0.22 ± 0.12+0.70 ± 0.08+0.15 ± 0.25+0.11 ± 0.50+0.00 ± 0.11
K-034+0.42 ± 0.12−0.01 ± 0.08+0.21 ± 0.06+0.34 ± 0.08+0.25 ± 0.19+0.14 ± 0.03+0.09 ± 0.11
K-163+0.60 ± 0.13+0.43 ± 0.09+0.28 ± 0.06+0.65 ± 0.22+0.02 ± 0.19−0.21 ± 0.17+0.09 ± 0.13
VHH81-03+0.22 ± 0.08−0.17 ± 0.16+0.12 ± 0.10+0.14 ± 0.29+0.21 ± 0.29+0.10 ± 0.10
VHH81-05+0.25 ± 0.12+0.54 ± 0.09+0.55 ± 0.17−0.11 ± 0.61−0.19 ± 0.06−0.40 ± 0.11
Table 5.

Derived abundances.

Cluster[Mg/Fe] ± σMg[Ca/Fe] ± σCa[Ti/Fe] ± σTi[Na/Fe] ± σNa[Cr/Fe] ± σCr[Mn/Fe] ± σMn[Ni/Fe] ± σNi
(dex)(dex)(dex)(dex)(dex)(dex)(dex)
AAT117062+0.55 ± 0.13+0.25 ± 0.10+0.39 ± 0.14+0.11 ± 0.20−0.08 ± 0.24+0.17 ± 0.07
HGHH-04+0.44 ± 0.17+0.53 ± 0.16+0.51 ± 0.10+0.12 ± 0.20−0.70 ± 0.29+0.04 ± 0.11
HGHH-06+0.64 ± 0.06+0.33 ± 0.16+0.33 ± 0.10+0.16 ± 0.13−0.25 ± 0.29+0.24 ± 0.15
HGHH-07+0.53 ± 0.13+0.48 ± 0.13+0.28 ± 0.10+0.26 ± 0.20+0.08 ± 0.19−0.05 ± 0.28+0.13 ± 0.08
HGHH-11+0.32 ± 0.11−0.09 ± 0.12+0.13 ± 0.15+0.04 ± 0.08−0.12 ± 0.08+0.25 ± 0.29+0.08 ± 0.11
HGHH-17+0.52 ± 0.10+0.44 ± 0.08+0.27 ± 0.05+0.04 ± 0.18+0.17 ± 0.30−0.02 ± 0.17+0.15 ± 0.07
HGHH-21+0.54 ± 0.09+0.31 ± 0.09+0.43 ± 0.11+0.20 ± 0.24+0.17 ± 0.07+0.24 ± 0.19
HGHH-23+0.28 ± 0.14+0.01 ± 0.11+0.05 ± 0.23+0.38 ± 0.08+0.09 ± 0.19+0.13 ± 0.29−0.12 ± 0.18
HGHH-29+0.43 ± 0.06+0.04 ± 0.06+0.28 ± 0.07+0.26 ± 0.29+0.20 ± 0.23+0.12 ± 0.14
HGHH-34+0.35 ± 0.09+0.00 ± 0.06+0.49 ± 0.18+0.02 ± 0.18+0.18 ± 0.06+0.23 ± 0.10
HGHH-40+0.24 ± 0.09+0.19 ± 0.07+0.27 ± 0.25+0.05 ± 0.44−0.13 ± 0.06+0.30 ± 0.32
HH-080+0.18 ± 0.14+0.35 ± 0.09+0.30 ± 0.14+0.04 ± 0.19−0.01 ± 0.18+0.03 ± 0.14
HH-096+0.35 ± 0.22+0.38 ± 0.05+0.27 ± 0.07+0.09 ± 0.12−0.24 ± 0.22+0.14 ± 0.10
HHH86-30+0.29 ± 0.06−0.19 ± 0.13+0.27 ± 0.12+0.26 ± 0.10+0.25 ± 0.17+0.18 ± 0.08+0.10 ± 0.07
HHH86-39+0.12 ± 0.20+0.24 ± 0.25−0.05 ± 0.11+0.13 ± 0.63−0.32 ± 0.26−0.13 ± 0.15
K-029+0.44 ± 0.11+0.16 ± 0.14+0.22 ± 0.12+0.70 ± 0.08+0.15 ± 0.25+0.11 ± 0.50+0.00 ± 0.11
K-034+0.42 ± 0.12−0.01 ± 0.08+0.21 ± 0.06+0.34 ± 0.08+0.25 ± 0.19+0.14 ± 0.03+0.09 ± 0.11
K-163+0.60 ± 0.13+0.43 ± 0.09+0.28 ± 0.06+0.65 ± 0.22+0.02 ± 0.19−0.21 ± 0.17+0.09 ± 0.13
VHH81-03+0.22 ± 0.08−0.17 ± 0.16+0.12 ± 0.10+0.14 ± 0.29+0.21 ± 0.29+0.10 ± 0.10
VHH81-05+0.25 ± 0.12+0.54 ± 0.09+0.55 ± 0.17−0.11 ± 0.61−0.19 ± 0.06−0.40 ± 0.11
Cluster[Mg/Fe] ± σMg[Ca/Fe] ± σCa[Ti/Fe] ± σTi[Na/Fe] ± σNa[Cr/Fe] ± σCr[Mn/Fe] ± σMn[Ni/Fe] ± σNi
(dex)(dex)(dex)(dex)(dex)(dex)(dex)
AAT117062+0.55 ± 0.13+0.25 ± 0.10+0.39 ± 0.14+0.11 ± 0.20−0.08 ± 0.24+0.17 ± 0.07
HGHH-04+0.44 ± 0.17+0.53 ± 0.16+0.51 ± 0.10+0.12 ± 0.20−0.70 ± 0.29+0.04 ± 0.11
HGHH-06+0.64 ± 0.06+0.33 ± 0.16+0.33 ± 0.10+0.16 ± 0.13−0.25 ± 0.29+0.24 ± 0.15
HGHH-07+0.53 ± 0.13+0.48 ± 0.13+0.28 ± 0.10+0.26 ± 0.20+0.08 ± 0.19−0.05 ± 0.28+0.13 ± 0.08
HGHH-11+0.32 ± 0.11−0.09 ± 0.12+0.13 ± 0.15+0.04 ± 0.08−0.12 ± 0.08+0.25 ± 0.29+0.08 ± 0.11
HGHH-17+0.52 ± 0.10+0.44 ± 0.08+0.27 ± 0.05+0.04 ± 0.18+0.17 ± 0.30−0.02 ± 0.17+0.15 ± 0.07
HGHH-21+0.54 ± 0.09+0.31 ± 0.09+0.43 ± 0.11+0.20 ± 0.24+0.17 ± 0.07+0.24 ± 0.19
HGHH-23+0.28 ± 0.14+0.01 ± 0.11+0.05 ± 0.23+0.38 ± 0.08+0.09 ± 0.19+0.13 ± 0.29−0.12 ± 0.18
HGHH-29+0.43 ± 0.06+0.04 ± 0.06+0.28 ± 0.07+0.26 ± 0.29+0.20 ± 0.23+0.12 ± 0.14
HGHH-34+0.35 ± 0.09+0.00 ± 0.06+0.49 ± 0.18+0.02 ± 0.18+0.18 ± 0.06+0.23 ± 0.10
HGHH-40+0.24 ± 0.09+0.19 ± 0.07+0.27 ± 0.25+0.05 ± 0.44−0.13 ± 0.06+0.30 ± 0.32
HH-080+0.18 ± 0.14+0.35 ± 0.09+0.30 ± 0.14+0.04 ± 0.19−0.01 ± 0.18+0.03 ± 0.14
HH-096+0.35 ± 0.22+0.38 ± 0.05+0.27 ± 0.07+0.09 ± 0.12−0.24 ± 0.22+0.14 ± 0.10
HHH86-30+0.29 ± 0.06−0.19 ± 0.13+0.27 ± 0.12+0.26 ± 0.10+0.25 ± 0.17+0.18 ± 0.08+0.10 ± 0.07
HHH86-39+0.12 ± 0.20+0.24 ± 0.25−0.05 ± 0.11+0.13 ± 0.63−0.32 ± 0.26−0.13 ± 0.15
K-029+0.44 ± 0.11+0.16 ± 0.14+0.22 ± 0.12+0.70 ± 0.08+0.15 ± 0.25+0.11 ± 0.50+0.00 ± 0.11
K-034+0.42 ± 0.12−0.01 ± 0.08+0.21 ± 0.06+0.34 ± 0.08+0.25 ± 0.19+0.14 ± 0.03+0.09 ± 0.11
K-163+0.60 ± 0.13+0.43 ± 0.09+0.28 ± 0.06+0.65 ± 0.22+0.02 ± 0.19−0.21 ± 0.17+0.09 ± 0.13
VHH81-03+0.22 ± 0.08−0.17 ± 0.16+0.12 ± 0.10+0.14 ± 0.29+0.21 ± 0.29+0.10 ± 0.10
VHH81-05+0.25 ± 0.12+0.54 ± 0.09+0.55 ± 0.17−0.11 ± 0.61−0.19 ± 0.06−0.40 ± 0.11

4.1 Sensitivity to input isochrones

The integrated-light analysis done here relies on theoretical models. We make use of α-enhanced isochrones by the Dartmouth group, as we are mainly studying relatively older populations. However, to test the uncertainties involved in a particular choice of theoretical isochrones, we repeat the full abundance analysis using instead solar-scaled Padova and Trieste Stellar Evolution Code (PARSEC) isochrones (Bressan et al. 2012). An additional difference between the α-enhanced Dartmouth isochrones and the solar-scaled PARSEC models, other than the chemical composition, is the stellar evolutionary phase coverage. The PARSEC models include the HB and AGB phases and do not require empirical data for the post-RGB stellar phases.

In Fig. 6, we compare [Fe/H] as measured using α-enhanced isochrones (Dartmouth) and solar-scaled isochrones (PARSEC). We find that the average difference is ≲0.1 dex. The highest difference is observed in the most metal-rich GC, VHH81-03, with a difference in the estimated [Fe/H] of ∼0.2 dex. From Fig. 6, we can see that at low metallicities ([Fe/H] < −1.0), the inferred [Fe/H] abundances agree with each other. Larsen et al. (2017) compared metallicities obtained from integrated-light observations for seven Galactic GCs using Dartmouth isochrones and MIST (MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks, Choi et al. 2016; Dotter 2016) models. Their sample spanned metallicities from [Fe/H] ∼ −2.4 to ∼ −0.5 dex. Similar to our test results, Larsen et al. (2017) found comparable metallicities and abundances for the most metal-poor clusters, [Fe/H] < −2.0 using both models, Dartmouth and MIST. The metal-rich regime appeared to have larger model dependencies than what was observed for the metal-poor end. Similar results were observed by Colucci et al. (2016) when comparing their Galactic GC [Fe/H] derived from integrated-light observations and those from Harris (1991, 2010 edition). They find accurate values to within ∼0.1 dex at low metallicities, [Fe/H] ≲ −0.3 dex, and observe higher offsets for the metal-rich clusters. This might be caused by the similarities between different theoretical isochrones, especially in what appears to be the better understood metal-poor regime. In general, it seems that Fe abundances from integrated-light analysis are more robust at lower metallicities, than at higher values ([Fe/H] > −1.0 dex).

Comparison between the metallicities inferred using α-enhanced isochrone (Dartmouth), and solar-scaled isochrones (PARSEC). The grey dashed line shows equal values.
Figure 6.

Comparison between the metallicities inferred using α-enhanced isochrone (Dartmouth), and solar-scaled isochrones (PARSEC). The grey dashed line shows equal values.

In the different panels of Fig. 7, we compare the abundances obtained for the rest of the elements. Replacing the α-enhanced isochrones with solar-scaled models increases the [Mg/Fe] abundances on average by ∼0.12 dex. For [Ca/Fe] ratios, the differences between the two runs are comparatively smaller, with average differences of the order of 0.05 dex (top right panel in Fig. 7). Changing the isochrone models from α-enhanced to solar-scaled decreases the [Ti/Fe] ratios only slightly, with average differences of ∼0.08 dex. Overall, we find no correlation between the differences in the abundance ratios of [(Ca, Ti)/Fe] and the [Fe/H] abundances. For Mg, however, we see a slight correlation where the largest differences are seen in the two clusters with higher metallicities, VHH81-03 and HHH86-30.

Comparison between the detailed abundances measured using α-enhanced isochrone (Dartmouth), and solar-scaled isochrones (PARSEC). The element in question is indicated in the corresponding panel. The grey dashed line shows equal values.
Figure 7.

Comparison between the detailed abundances measured using α-enhanced isochrone (Dartmouth), and solar-scaled isochrones (PARSEC). The element in question is indicated in the corresponding panel. The grey dashed line shows equal values.

In addition to the α-elements, we also estimate abundances for Fe-peak elements changing the input models. The average differences for [Cr/Fe], [Mn/Fe], and [Ni/Fe] ratios is ∼0.05, 0.08, and 0.05, respectively. Comparison abundances for Fe-peak elements are also shown in Fig. 7. No general correlations between the ratio differences and metallicity are observed for any of the Fe-peak elements.

4.2 Fe and Ca abundances: comparison with literature

Beasley et al. (2008) derived empirical metallicities, [m/H], for all 20 GCs in our sample. In the left-hand panel of Fig. 8 (red circles), we compare our metallicities to those measured by Beasley et al. (2008). In general, we find excellent agreement between their work, and our inferred [Fe/H] abundances, except for GC HHH86-39. For this cluster, Beasley et al. estimate a metallicity of [m/H] = −0.48, whereas we find an [Fe/H] abundance of −1.29 ± 0.05 dex. As described in Section 3.1 for the initial selection of isochrones and empirical CMDs, we adopt the ages and metallicities by Beasley et al. (2008). For HHH86-39, we initially select an isochrone with metallicity −0.48 dex, and see that the inferred metallicities converge on to lower values. We continue re-estimating the metallicity for HHH86-39 using instead an isochrone with [Fe/H] = −1.28 dex and estimate a consistent [Fe/H] abundance of −1.29 ± 0.05. Given the self-consistency between the input isochrone and the measured [Fe/H] abundance, we continue our analysis adopting the inferred [Fe/H] = −1.29 ± 0.05 dex. As we noted earlier, the line index techniques used by Beasley et al. (2008) do not measure [Fe/H] necessarily. However, an overall metallicity comparison is still a useful test.

[Fe/H] and [Ca/Fe] abundance comparison between this work and that from Colucci et al. 2013 (in blue circles), and Beasley et al. 2008 (in red circles). The dash line in both panels represents a 1:1 relation.
Figure 8.

[Fe/H] and [Ca/Fe] abundance comparison between this work and that from Colucci et al. 2013 (in blue circles), and Beasley et al. 2008 (in red circles). The dash line in both panels represents a 1:1 relation.

Using high-resolution and high S/N integrated-light observations Colucci et al. (2013) measured Fe and Ca abundances for a sample of 10 GCs in NGC 5128. Of the 10 clusters in Colucci et al. (2013), we have four clusters in common between their study and our work. From a direct comparison to the metallicities obtained by Colucci et al. (2013), we see an average offset of ∼ +0.2 dex between their metallicities and those estimated here; however, they all agree within 2σ (see Fig. 8, left-hand panel).

Similarly, in the right-hand panel of Fig. 8, we compare our inferred [Ca/Fe] ratios to those obtained by Colucci et al. (2013). The [Ca/Fe] ratios of three out of four clusters are in excellent agreement, within 1σ, to those measured in the high-resolution observations. The Ca abundance for the fourth cluster, HGHH-29, appears to be a 3σ outlier compared to our [Ca/Fe] measurements with an offset of the order of ∼0.3 dex. We visually inspect the Ca model fits and find no anomalies, as well as consistent [Ca/Fe] abundances between the different bins.

5 DISCUSSION

In this section, we discuss our abundance measurements, along with a comparison to other NGC 5128 abundance studies in the literature. We also compare the abundance patterns observed in NGC 5128 to those studied in different environments, such as the MW and M 31.

5.1 α-elements

As mentioned before, it is believed that α-elements (O, Mg, Si, Ca, and Ti) are primarily produced in high-mass stars and ejected through core-collapse supernovae (Woosley & Weaver 1995). Given that these elements are believed to be part of a homogenous group, it is common for abundance studies to average their abundances to obtain a single [α/Fe] ratio. In general, the abundances of these different elements appear to correlate tightly with each other in Galactic stars. However, [Mg/Fe] has been observed to be slightly more enhanced than the rest of the α-elements in dSph galaxies (Shetrone 2004; Venn et al. 2004). This difference between the Mg ratios and those of Ca and Ti could have nucleosynthetic origins. Although all three elements, Mg, Ca, and Ti, are produced inside high-mass stars, Mg is created through hydrostatic C- and O-burning, in contrast to Ca and Ti isotopes which are formed in the α-process (Woosley & Weaver 1995; Nakamura et al. 2001). If these two processes do not occur together, then one would expect to see differences in the [Mg/Fe] ratios when compared to those of [Ca/Fe] and [Ti/Fe]. This being said, the differences in the [Mg/Fe] and [(Ca,Ti)/Fe] ratios might also be explained by different star formation histories, mixing time-scales or IMFs.

In Fig. 9, we display the [Mg/Fe], [Ca/Fe], and [Ti/Fe] ratios as a function of metallicity for all 20 GCs in NGC 5128 (red stars). We compare our NGC 5128 α-element abundances to those observed in Galactic stars for both halo and disc stars (black crosses), MW bulge stars (yellow points), and GCs in the MW (green circles). We also include the [Ca/Fe] abundances for the GC sample in NGC 5128 studied by Colucci et al. (2013) as blue stars. It is important to note that the MW stellar abundances shown as black crosses in Fig. 9 cover the different Galactic components, halo, thin and thick discs. An analysis focused on the kinematical information available for different MW stars allowed Venn et al. (2004) to assign stars to different Galactic components finding that halo stars reach metallicities as high as [Fe/H] ∼ −1 dex. At higher metallicities than this MW disc stars seem to predominate. As seen from Fig. 9, all of the star clusters in our sample of NGC 5128 with [Fe/H] < −0.5 dex are enhanced in [α/Fe] relative to solar abundance.

Top: [Mg/Fe] versus [Fe/H]. Middle: [Ca/Fe] versus [Fe/H]. Bottom: [Ti/Fe] versus [Fe/H]. In red stars, we show the α abundances for GCs in NGC 5128 (this work). Blue stars show the abundances for GCs in NGC 5128 by Colucci et al. (2013). Green circles show abundance measurements of GCs in the MW by Pritzl et al. (2005). Black crosses show the ratio abundance of MW stars found in the literature (Reddy et al. 2003, 2006; Venn et al. 2004; Ishigaki et al. 2013). Abundance measurements for bulge stars in the MW are shown in yellow points (Bensby et al. 2013; Johnson et al. 2014; Gonzalez et al. 2015).
Figure 9.

Top: [Mg/Fe] versus [Fe/H]. Middle: [Ca/Fe] versus [Fe/H]. Bottom: [Ti/Fe] versus [Fe/H]. In red stars, we show the α abundances for GCs in NGC 5128 (this work). Blue stars show the abundances for GCs in NGC 5128 by Colucci et al. (2013). Green circles show abundance measurements of GCs in the MW by Pritzl et al. (2005). Black crosses show the ratio abundance of MW stars found in the literature (Reddy et al. 2003, 2006; Venn et al. 2004; Ishigaki et al. 2013). Abundance measurements for bulge stars in the MW are shown in yellow points (Bensby et al. 2013; Johnson et al. 2014; Gonzalez et al. 2015).

It is clear from the top panel of Fig. 9 that we measure relatively high enhancement in [Mg/Fe] ratios, when compared to what is seen in the MW (GCs and field stars). For lower metallicities, [Fe/H] < −0.75 dex, we measure an average [Mg/Fe] = +0.49 ± 0.05 for the GCs in NGC 5128, compared to [Mg/Fe] = +0.33 ± 0.01 for Galactic stars (mainly halo stars), and [Mg/Fe] = +0.33 ± 0.03 for GCs in the MW. We note that the errors are estimated by turning the standard deviation estimates into errors on the mean abundances. The highest enhancement in the [Mg/Fe] ratios is observed in six GCs with metallicities in the range of −1.15 < [Fe/H] < −0.92 dex, with average [Mg/Fe] ∼ 0.56 dex. If we instead compare the mean [Mg/Fe] ratios for GCs with metallicities [Fe/H] < −1.25 dex, we find [Mg/Fe] = +0.31 ± 0.06 and +0.32 ± 0.04 for GCs in NGC 5128 and the MW, respectively. To confirm if the enhancement at metallicities [Fe/H] < −0.75 dex is genuine, we recommend extending the GCs sample size in NGC 5128 to cover a larger range in metallicities, similar to the GC sample in the MW (with metallicities at the lower end extending to [Fe/H] ∼ −2.4 dex). For metallicities higher than [Fe/H] > −0.75, the [Mg/Fe] ratios are close to the upper envelope of measurements of field stars in the MW (black crosses) and rather comparable to average [Mg/Fe] values found in Galactic bulge stars (yellow points). For comparison to the GCs in the MW, we take the weighted averages and find mean [Mg/Fe] ratios of +0.34 ± 0.03 and +0.24 ± 0.13 for the GCs in NGC 5128 and Galactic GCs, respectively, where we might be detecting a slightly higher enhancement in the NGC 5128 GCs compared to the few GCs in the MW at these metallicities.

For the Ca abundances in GCs in NGC 5128, Colucci et al. (2013) reported a relatively high enhancement of [Ca/Fe] = +0.37 ± 0.07 for clusters with metallicities of [Fe/H] < −0.4. For consistency, we take the [Ca/Fe] ratios of Colucci et al. (2013) and calculate a simple mean for clusters with [Fe/H] < −0.75, which gives [Ca/Fe] = +0.39 ± 0.03. Taking the mean of our inferred [Ca/Fe] for GCs with [Fe/H] < −0.75, we obtain [Ca/Fe] = +0.36 ± 0.04, certainly within the errors of the mean abundance ratio of Colucci et al. (2013). Again, these values are higher than what is observed in the MW stars at the same metallicities, [Ca/Fe] +0.27 ± 0.01. The agreement between the two independent studies of NGC 5128 confirms the Ca abundance enhancement in the metal-poor GCs. At metallicities [Fe/H] > −0.75, the [Ca/Fe] ratios decrease to solar/subsolar abundances, which is rarely observed in any of the MW components. The two most metal-rich GCs in our sample, HHH86-30 and VHH81-03, appear to be those with the lowest [Ca/Fe] abundance ratios. We note that abundances in the GC sample by Colucci et al. (2013) show instead a less steep decrease in [Ca/Fe] towards higher metallicities.

We also see enhanced Ti abundances with a mean value [Ti/Fe] = +0.32 ± 0.03, for metallicities [Fe/H] < −0.75 (see bottom panel of Fig. 9). This in contrast to the mean [Ti/Fe] ratio seen in Galactic stars, [Ti/Fe] = +0.25 ± 0.01, and a similar mean average for MW GCs, [Ti/Fe] = +0.25 ± 0.02. Resembling what we observe in the [Mg/Fe] ratios at higher metallicities, [Fe/H] > −0.75, we find that the [Ti/Fe] abundances are more comparable to the few [Ti/Fe] ratios measured in the MW bulge, which tend to be on the upper envelope of the stellar abundances in the MW (black crosses in Fig. 9).

In general, the [α/Fe] abundances for GCs with [Fe/H] < −0.75 in NGC 5128 appear to be higher than those observed in the MW by ∼0.10–0.15 dex. We note that systematic differences between the measurement techniques cannot be ruled out as a possible cause for the observed enhancement of the [α/Fe] ratios. A broad range of studies infer different abundances provided the different methods, models, and parameters used. As discussed in Section 4.1, similar offsets are seen when changing the input isochrones from α-enhanced to solar-scaled for Mg abundances. However, the agreement between the Ca enhancement in the metal-poor GCs in the independent study by Colucci et al. (2013) and this work adds confidence to the validity of the measurements.

If the overall enhancement in the α-elements measured in this work is genuine, this could hint at an IMF skewed to high-mass stars. We also note that in addition to relatively high α abundances, through an empirical spectroscopic study of the metallicity distribution function of the GC system in NGC 5128 Beasley et al. (2008) find that the mean metallicity of this galaxy is ∼0.5 dex more metal rich than that of the MW GC system (Schiavon et al. 2005; Puzia et al. 2002). The combination of these two effects, high average metallicity and enhanced [α/Fe] ratios, might indicate that high-mass SNe II have been the main drivers in chemically diversifying the galaxy environment (McWilliam 1997). In a large study of metallicity and abundance ratios of early-type galaxies such as NGC 5128, using galaxy chemical evolution semi-analytical models (SAMs) with feedback from active galactic nuclei (AGNs) Arrigoni et al. (2010) find that in order to reproduce the galaxy observations, more specifically the observed positive slope in the mass–[α/Fe] relation, they have to apply a mildly top-heavy IMF along with a lower fraction of binaries that explodes as SNe Ia. The original expectation of this work was that the inclusion of the AGN feedback in the simulations would be able to reproduce the observed trend in mass and [α/Fe] ratios. However, they point out that a flatter IMF (skewed to high-mass stars) is needed to achieve the best agreement between observations and model. A slightly top-heavy IMF produces more massive stars, which in turn enrich the interstellar medium more efficiently allowing for more metal-rich galaxies and a better agreement with observed abundances.

Similar high enhancements were found by Puzia, Kissler-Patig & Goudfrooij (2006) in a large number of GCs in early-type galaxies. In their study, they find significantly high [α/Fe] abundances derived from Lick line index measurements, of the order of [α/Fe] > 0.5 dex. They compare these ratios with supernova yield models and find that a significant contribution from stars with masses >20 M are needed to reach [α/Fe] ratios ≳0.4 dex. In a comparable scenario to the one in NGC 5128, to explain the high [α/Fe] ratios in the elliptical galaxies, they proposed that in order to produce this amount of enriched material one needs to consider stellar populations composed of high-mass stars only, truncating the lower end of the IMF (<20 M), in combination with a relatively high SFR (Goodwin & Pagel 2005; Puzia et al. 2006). We point out that these empirical results appear only in their early-type galaxy sample, and is absent in the spirals studied as part of their work, suggesting an intrinsic difference in the formation histories of different galaxy types.

As shown with yellow points in Fig. 9, recent studies have found higher metallicities, [Fe/H], and enhanced [α/Fe] ratios for stars in the MW bulge (Matteucci & Brocato 1990; Bensby et al. 2013; Johnson et al. 2014; Gonzalez et al. 2015), similar to what is observed for the [Mg/Fe] and [Ti/Fe] ratios in the metal-rich GCs in NGC 5128. In principle, this might suggest similar formation histories with rapid chemical enrichment for NGC 5128 and the MW bulge. Photometric observations of halo stars in NGC 5128 analysed by Rejkuba et al. (2011) appear to support a rapid chemical enrichment scenario. Rejkuba et al. (2011) find that their CMD observations agree with older populations with high metallicities and enhanced α abundances.

We point out that previous abundance studies of GCs in NGC 5128 using line indices and low-resolution spectroscopic observations have not always found higher [α/Fe] ratios than in the MW. Beasley et al. (2008) and Woodley et al. (2010) estimated that the mean [α/Fe] ratios of the GC system in NGC 5128 are lower than the mean ratios measured in the MW. However, this conclusion is not unexpected given the large systematic uncertainties accompanying line index studies (Brodie & Strader 2006).

By visually inspecting Fig. 9, it appears that the [Mg/Fe] ratios throughout the whole metallicity range are more enhanced than [Ca/Fe] and [Ti/Fe]. As pointed out above, this behaviour has been observed in previous studies of dSph galaxies. Assuming this slight enhancement seen in [Mg/Fe] is not artificial, one possible explanation for differences between [(Ca, Ti)/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] is the lack of hypernovae in NGC 5128. According to Nakamura et al. (2001), the α-process takes place in hypernovae, creating 44Ca and 48Ti. Therefore, an environment with a lower number of hypernovae would appear to have lower [Ca/Fe] and [Ti/Fe] ratios, compared to [Mg/Fe]. This was the explanation suggested by Venn et al. (2004) for the difference in abundance ratios for [(Ca, Ti)/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] in dSphs.

5.2 Light elements: Na

We are able to measure [Na/Fe] abundance ratios for 9 out of the 20 clusters studied in this work. Light elements in general are of special interest given that recent studies have shown that these might not be entirely monometallic in GC populations, compared to [Fe/H] and other α-elements. We further discuss the observed star-to-star variations in GCs in Section 5.4.

We measured Na abundances using two wavelength bins, 5670–5700 and 6148–6168 Å covering the Na doublets 5682/5688 and 6154/6160 Å, respectively. This element is particularly difficult to measure as these lines are relatively weak. Given the quality of the spectra in the wavelength range of 5670–5700 Å, the strongest of the two doublets, we are only able to measure Na abundances for nine clusters. We note, however, that measurements for both bins are only available for seven out of these nine clusters. Whenever Na abundances are available for both bins, 5670–5700 and 6148–6168 Å, we find consistent Na measurements between the bins. In Fig. 10, we show our measured [Na/Fe] ratios as a function of metallicity. We see clearly elevated [Na/Fe] ratios in at least five GCs in NGC 5128, with higher values than those measured in field stars in the MW. Of course we currently do not have information about Na abundances of individual stars in NGC 5128; however, similar enhancements have been measured in integrated-light spectra of GCs in the MW and M 31, shown as green circles in Fig. 10 (Colucci et al. 2014, 2016).

[Na/Fe] abundance ratios as a function of [Fe/H]. Symbols similar to Fig. 9, with the exception of green circles here are integrated-light measurements of GCs in the MW and M31 by Colucci et al. (2014, 2016).
Figure 10.

[Na/Fe] abundance ratios as a function of [Fe/H]. Symbols similar to Fig. 9, with the exception of green circles here are integrated-light measurements of GCs in the MW and M31 by Colucci et al. (2014, 2016).

Clear correlations have been observed in Na and O abundances in MW GCs and extragalactic ones. We look for possible correlations between Na and any of the α- and Fe-peak elements studied here, but find no such behaviour.

5.3 Fe-peak elements

In this section, we present our measurements for the Fe-peak elements: Cr, Mn, and Ni. In general, Fe-peak elements are suggested to be produced in SN Ia, however it is still not clear if all of the elements form in the same nucleosynthetic process. In spite of that, Fe-peak elements are of interest since they track the production of Fe (Iwamoto et al. 1999).

Studies of Galactic stars show that the [Cr/Fe] abundance ratios are very close to [Cr/Fe] ∼ 0 throughout most of the metallicity coverage, as seen in the top panel of Fig. 11. For NGC 5128, we also see that the measured [Cr/Fe] are close to 0, within the errors of the individual measurements. However, we see an overall trend where the [Cr/Fe] values for NGC 5128 are slightly above solar. We measure a weighted mean of [Cr/Fe] = +0.06 ± 0.02 for the full GC sample in NGC 5128, slightly higher than the mean ratio observed in MW field stars, [Cr/Fe] = −0.05 ± 0.01. The mean [Cr/Fe] seen in NGC 5128 is more comparable to that measured for the MW bulge stars, [Cr/Fe] = +0.01 ± 0.01 (Fig. 11, yellow points), and certainly found within the spread of measured [Cr/Fe] in the Galactic bulge.

Top: [Cr/Fe] versus [Fe/H]. Middle: [Mn/Fe] versus [Fe/H]. Bottom: [Ni/Fe] versus [Fe/H]. Symbols as in Fig. 9.
Figure 11.

Top: [Cr/Fe] versus [Fe/H]. Middle: [Mn/Fe] versus [Fe/H]. Bottom: [Ni/Fe] versus [Fe/H]. Symbols as in Fig. 9.

Although most of the Fe-peak elements behave somewhat similarly with Fe ratios close to 0, it is well known that Mn is depleted by ∼ − 0.5 dex in some metal-poor MW halo stars and GCs (Gratton et al. 1989; Sobeck et al. 2006; Romano, Cescutti & Matteucci 2011), including extragalactic GCs (see middle panel in Fig. 11). The MW [Mn/Fe] ratios appear to increase towards solar values at higher metallicities. This behaviour has not been well understood, especially since the actual formation of Mn continues to be uncertain (Timmes, Woosley & Weaver 1995; Shetrone et al. 2003). However, a possible explanation for this trend is that Mn is underproduced in SN II but overproduced in SN Ia, or a more accepted scenario is that the amount of Mn created is dependent on the metallicity of the progenitor (Gratton et al. 1989). Given that several studies find that this trend in [Mn/Fe] could be caused by NLTE effects (Battistini & Bensby 2015; Bergemann 2008), we then make relative comparisons of our measured [Mn/Fe] to studies assuming LTE. It appears that once the NLTE corrections are applied, the trend disappears and follows a similar behaviour as the other Fe-peak elements.

Regarding our abundance measurements for NGC 5128 from Fig. 11, we can visually identify a trend of low [Mn/Fe] ratios at low metallicities, increasing towards solar, and above solar, at higher [Fe/H]. Although this is in agreement with similar trends observed in MW Galactic star and GC LTE studies, we see a slight offset in the trend of GCs in NGC 5128 compared to that of Galactic stars. For metallicities [Fe/H] > −1.0 dex, the [Mn/Fe] seem to reach higher abundances than the average MW field star population.

Ni also shows a relatively flat trend, with [Ni/Fe] abundance ratios close to 0, as shown in red stars in the bottom panel of Fig. 11. The overall trend seen in our [Ni/Fe] ratios for NGC 5128 is consistent with that of studies in the MW. Taking the weighted mean values of the full GC sample in NGC 5128, we measure [Ni/Fe] = +0.09 ± 0.04, compared to a slightly lower mean [Ni/Fe] ratio of −0.02 ± 0.01 for MW field stars.

Overall, we find that our Fe-peak abundances follow similar trends as those seen in MW field stars, however, we identify a slight enhancement in the Fe-peak measurements from the GC system in NGC 5128.

5.4 Multiple populations in GCs

Studies have shown that the [Mg/Fe] abundance ratios of field stars in the MW, LMC, and M 31 behave similarly to other α-elements (Bensby et al. 2005; Colucci et al. 2009; Gonzalez et al. 2011). However, in the last decades in-depth research on individual stellar abundances in GCs has presented results that suggest the presence of intracluster Mg variations with respect to α-elements in several Galactic clusters (Shetrone 1996; Kraft et al. 1997; Gratton, Sneden & Carretta 2004). Furthermore, integrated-light studies of extragalactic GCs appear to also detect these same variations in Mg as lower [Mg/Fe] when compared to other [α/Fe] ratios. Through a study of the integrated light of 31 GCs in M 31, Colucci et al. (2014) find evidence for intracluster Mg variations. More specifically, they find that the more metal-poor, [Fe/H] < −0.7, GCs in M 31 are biased to low [Mg/Fe] ratios, hinting at a depletion of Mg. They measure [Mg/Fe] ≲ 0.0 for GCs with metallicities [Fe/H] < −1.5. Similarly, studying the integrated light of extragalactic GCs in Fornax, Larsen et al. (2012) measure lower [Mg/Fe] than [Ca/Fe] and [Ti/Fe]. From Fig. 9, we clearly see that even in the low-metallicity regime, the [Mg/Fe] values are comparable to, or even higher than, those measured for [Ca/Fe] and [Ti/Fe]. Compared to the observations of Colucci et al. (2014) regarding the metal-poor GCs in M 31, we instead measure [Mg/Fe] ratios above solar abundances. These values suggest an absence of intracluster Mg variations in the GC populations in NGC 5128.

Similar to Mg, Na has exhibited star-to-star abundance variations in the GC population in the MW (for a recent review, see Gratton et al. 2004). In the last years, studies have found indirect evidence for abundance variations in extragalactic GCs (M 31, LMC, WLM, and IKN) that support the idea of intracluster abundance variations in Na (Colucci et al. 2009; Mucciarelli et al. 2009; Larsen et al. 2014). Specifically for Na, these intracluster variations are perceived as significantly elevated [Na/Fe] in integrated-light analysis of both galactic and extragalactic GCs. We find elevated [Na/Fe] abundance ratios for five GCs in NGC 5128, shown as red stars in Fig. 10. The enhancement in these GCs is higher than any abundances previously measured in any MW field stars, halo, disc or bulge. From the context of multiple populations in GCs, these enhancement in the Na abundances can in principle show evidence of star-to-star variations.

6 CONCLUSIONS

Through the analysis of integrated-light observations taken with the X-Shooter spectrograph on ESO's VLT and synthetic spectra created based on theoretical α-enhanced isochrones by the Dartmouth group, we obtain accurate metallicities for 20 GCs. The GCs studied here have metallicities ranging between [Fe/H] = −1.92 and −0.13 dex. We measure α-elements (Mg, Ca, and Ti), as well as a single light element (Na), and Fe-peak elements (Cr, Mn, and Ni). The new results of our work can be summarized as follows:

  • Comparing our inferred metallicities to measurements from Beasley et al. (2008), we find excellent agreement between both works.

  • When comparing the four GC [Ca/Fe] abundance measurements to those by Colucci et al. (2013), we find that three out of four clusters are in good agreement, within 1σ. The [Ca/Fe] measurement of the fourth GC in Colucci et al. (2013) appears to be a 3σ outlier compared to our inferred abundances.

  • We find higher enhancement (∼ 0.1 dex) in α-elements for the metal-poor ([Fe/H < −0.75 dex) GCs in NGC 5128, than what is observed in the MW. This could hint at a top-heavy IMF, a scenario supported by SAMs of galactic chemical evolution of early-type galaxies. Arrigoni et al. (2010) find that a slightly top-heavy IMF is essential to match the observations with models. However, we recommend to extend the GC sample size to firmly confirm such a scenario.

  • We find [Mg/Fe] ratios to be slightly higher than the [Ca/Fe] and [Ti/Fe] ratios. We suggest a lack of hypernovae in NGC 5128 as a possible explanation for this difference.

  • In the context of multiple populations of GCs in NGC 5128, we measure Na in nine clusters. We find enhanced [Na/Fe] ratios for five GCs in our sample, providing evidence of star-to-star variations in these GCs. We find an absence of intracluster Mg variations in all 20 clusters.

  • We obtain the first measurements of Cr, Mn, and Ni for 20 GCs in NGC 5128, and find that the overall abundances follow similar trends as those seen in the MW field stars. We see a slight enhancement (<0.1 dex) in the mean Fe-peak abundances, when compared to those seen in the MW.

We point out that the work presented here is based on GC observations with exposure times of ≲30 min. Longer exposure times would provide better S/N on all three X-Shooter arms, increasing the integrated-light analysis potential especially for the NIR wavelengths. Such a coverage would allow for an in-depth study of the Al lines (i.e. 13123.38 and 13150.71 Å) providing information on possible [Al/Fe] enhancements similar to those observed in Galactic GCs, contributing to our discussion of multiple populations in extragalactic GCs.

The general agreement between existing metallicities and Ca abundance measurements and those presented as part of this work is extremely encouraging for future integrated-light analysis, reassuring that reliable metallicities and detailed chemical abundances can be obtained using intermediate-resolution observations.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank A. Gonneau, Y.-P. Chen, and M. Dries for their help and guidance during the X-Shooter reduction process. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This is based on observations made with ESO telescopes at the La Silla Paranal Observatory under programme ID 085.B-0107(A).

Footnotes

REFERENCES

Arrigoni
M.
,
Trager
S. C.
,
Somerville
R. S.
,
Gibson
B. K.
,
2010
,
MNRAS
,
402
,
173

Battistini
C.
,
Bensby
T.
,
2015
,
A&A
,
577
,
A9

Beasley
M.
,
Bridges
T.
,
Peng
E.
,
Harris
W. E.
,
Harris
G. L. H.
,
Forbes
D. A.
,
Mackie
G.
,
2008
,
MNRAS
,
386
,
1443

Bensby
T.
,
Feltzing
S.
,
Lundström
I.
,
Ilyin
I.
,
2005
,
A&A
,
433
,
185

Bensby
T.
et al. ,
2013
,
A&A
,
549
,
A147

Bergemann
M.
,
2008
,
Phys. Scr. Vol. T
,
133
,
014013

Bergemann
M.
,
Kudritzki
R.-P.
,
Gazak
Z.
,
Davies
B.
,
Plez
B.
,
2015
,
ApJ
,
804
,
113

Bresolin
F.
,
2008
,
The Metal-Rich Universe
.
Cambridge Univ. Press
,
Cambridge, UK
, p.
155

Bressan
A.
,
Marigo
P.
,
Girardi
L.
,
Salasnich
B.
,
Dal Cero
C.
,
Rubele
S.
,
Nanni
A.
,
2012
,
MNRAS
,
427
,
127

Brodie
J. P.
,
Strader
J.
,
2006
,
ARA&A
,
44
,
193

Burstein
D.
,
Faber
S. M.
,
Gaskell
C. M.
,
Krumm
N.
,
1984
,
ApJ
,
287
,
586

Cameron
S. A.
,
2009
,
PhD thesis
,
University of Michigan

Castelli
F.
,
Gratton
R. G.
,
Kurucz
R. L.
,
1997
,
A&A
,
318
,
841

Chen
Y.
,
Trager
S. C.
,
Peletier
R. F.
,
Lançon
A.
,
Vazdekis
A.
,
Prugniel
Ph.
,
Silva
D. R.
,
Gonneau
A.
,
2014
,
A&A
,
565
,
A117

Choi
J.
,
Dotter
A.
,
Conroy
C.
,
Cantiello
M.
,
Paxton
B.
,
Johnson
B. D.
,
2016
,
ApJ
,
823
,
102

Colucci
J. E.
,
Bernstein
R. A.
,
Cameron
S.
,
McWilliam
A.
,
Cohen
J. G.
,
2009
,
ApJ
,
704
,
385

Colucci
J. E.
,
Bernstein
R. A.
,
Cameron
S. A.
,
McWilliam
A.
,
2011
,
ApJ
,
735
,
55

Colucci
J. E.
,
Duran
M. F.
,
Bernstein
R. A.
,
McWilliam
A.
,
2013
,
ApJ
,
773
,
36

Colucci
J. E.
,
Bernstein
R. A.
,
Cohen
J. G.
,
2014
,
ApJ
,
797
,
116

Colucci
J. E.
,
Bernstein
R. A.
,
McWilliam
A.
,
2016
,
ApJ
,
834
,
105

Dotter
A.
,
2016
,
ApJS
,
222
,
8

Dotter
A.
,
Chaboyer
B.
,
Jevremović
D.
,
Baron
E.
,
Ferguson
J. W.
,
Sarajedini
A.
,
Anderson
J.
,
2007
,
AJ
,
134
,
376

Fisher
D.
,
Franx
M.
,
Illingworth
G.
,
1995
,
ApJ
,
448
,
119

Gonzalez
O. A.
et al. ,
2011
,
A&A
,
530
,
A54

Gonzalez
O. A.
et al. ,
2015
,
A&A
,
584
,
A46

Goodwin
S. P.
,
Pagel
B. E. J.
,
2005
,
MNRAS
,
359
,
707

Gratton
R. G.
,
1989
,
A&A
,
208
,
171

Gratton
R.
,
Sneden
C.
,
Carretta
E.
,
2004
,
ARA&A
,
42
,
385

Grevesse
N.
,
Sauval
A. J.
,
1998
,
Space Sci. Rev.
,
85
,
161

Gustafsson
B.
,
Edvardsson
B.
,
Eriksson
K.
,
Jørgensen
U. G.
,
Nordlund
Å.
,
Plez
B.
,
2008
,
A&A
,
486
,
951

Harris
W. E.
,
1991
,
ARA&A
,
29
,
543

Harris
W. E.
,
1996
,
AJ
,
112
,
1487

Harris
G. L. H.
,
Rejkuba
M.
,
Harris
W. E.
,
2010
,
PASA
,
27
,
457

Hernandez
S.
,
Larsen
S.
,
Trager
S.
,
Groot
P.
,
Kaper
L.
,
2017
,
A&A
,
603
,
A119

Hernandez
S.
,
Larsen
S.
,
Trager
S.
,
Kaper
L.
,
Groot
P.
,
2018
,
MNRAS
,
473
,
826

Horne
K.
,
1986
,
PASP
,
98
,
609

Ishigaki
M. N.
,
Aoki
W.
,
Chiba
M.
,
2013
,
ApJ
,
771
,
67

Iwamoto
K.
,
Brachwitz
F.
,
Nomoto
K.
,
Kishimoto
N.
,
Umeda
H.
,
Hix
W. R.
,
Thielemann
F.-K.
,
1999
,
ApJS
,
125
,
439

Johnson
C. I.
,
Rich
R. M.
,
Kobayashi
C.
,
Kunder
A.
,
Koch
A.
,
2014
,
AJ
,
148
,
67

Kennicutt
R. C.
Jr,et al. ,
2003
,
PASP
,
115
,
928

Kewley
L. J.
,
Ellison
S. L.
,
2008
,
ApJ
,
681
,
1183

Kraft
R. P.
,
Sneden
C.
,
Smith
G. H.
,
Shetrone
M. D.
,
Langer
G.E
,
Pilachowski
C. A.
,
1997
, AJ, 113, 279-95

Kuntschner
H.
,
2000
,
MNRAS
,
315
,
184

Kurucz
R. L.
,
1970
,
SAO Spec. Rep. #309

Kurucz
R. L.
,
Avrett
E. H.
,
1981
,
SAO Spec. Rep. #391

Kurucz
R. L.
,
Furenlid
I.
,
1979
,
SAO Spec. Rep. #387

Larsen
S.
,
Brodie
J. P.
,
Strader
J.
,
2012
,
A&A
,
546
,
A53
(L12)

Larsen
S.
,
Brodie
J. P
,
Forbes
D. A.
,
Strader
J.
,
2014
,
A&A
,
565
,
A98

Larsen
S.
,
Brodie
J. P.
,
Strader
J.
,
2017
,
A&A
,
601
,
96

Lee
J. C.
,
Salzer
J. J.
,
Melbourne
J.
,
2004
,
ApJ
,
616
,
752

López-Sánchez
Á. R.
,
Dopita
M. A.
,
Kewley
L. J.
,
Zahid
H. J.
,
Nicholls
D. C.
,
Scharwächter
J.
,
2012
,
MNRAS
,
426
,
2630

Matteucci
F.
,
2003
,
Astrophys. Space Sci.
,
284
,
539

Matteucci
F.
,
Brocato
E.
,
1990
,
ApJ
,
365
,
539

McWilliam
A.
,
1997
,
ARA&A
,
35
,
503

McWilliam
A.
,
Bernstein
R. A.
,
2008
,
ApJ
,
684
,
326

Mucciarelli
A.
,
Origlia
L.
,
Ferraro
F. R.
,
Pancino
E.
,
2009
,
ApJ
,
695
,
L134

Nakamura
T.
,
Umeda
H.
,
Iwamoto
K.
,
Nomoto
K.
,
Hashimoto
M.
,
Hix
W. R.
,
Thielemann
F.-K.
,
2001
,
ApJ
,
555
,
880

Nomoto
K.
,
Iwamoto
K.
,
Kishimoto
N.
,
1997
,
Science
,
276
,
1378

Olsen
K A G
,
Miller
B W
,
Suntzeff
N B
,
Schommer
R A
,
Bright
J.
,
2004
.
AJ
127
,
2674

Pierce
M.
,
Brodie
J. P.
,
Forbes
D. A.
,
Beasley
M. A.
,
Proctor
R
,
Strader
J.
,
2005
,
MNRAS
,
358
,
419

Pilachowski
C. A.
,
Sneden
C.
,
Kraft
R. P.
,
1996
,
AJ
,
111
,
1689

Plez
B.
,
2012
,
Astrophysics Source Code Library
,
record ascl:1205.004

Pritzl
B. J.
,
Venn
K. A.
,
Irwin
M.
,
2005
,
AJ
,
130
,
2140

Proctor
R. N.
,
Sansom
A. E.
,
2002
,
MNRAS
,
333
,
517

Puzia
T. H.
,
Saglia
R. P.
,
Kissler-Patig
M.
,
Maraston
C.
,
Greggio
L.
,
Renzini
A.
,
Ortolani
S.
,
2002
,
A&A
,
395
,
45

Puzia
T. H.
,
Kissler-Patig
M.
,
Thomas
D.
,
Maraston
C.
,
Saglia
R. P.
,
Bender
R.
,
Goudfrooij
P.
,
Hempel
P.
,
2005
,
A&A
,
439
,
997

Puzia
T. H.
,
Kissler-Patig
M.
,
Goudfrooij
P.
,
2006
,
ApJ
,
648
,
383

Ramírez
I.
,
Allende Prieto
C.
,
2011
,
ApJ
,
743
,
135

Reddy
B. E.
,
Tomkin
J.
,
Lambert
D. L.
,
Allende Prieto
C.
,
2003
,
MNRAS
,
340
,
304

Reddy
B. E.
,
Lambert
D. L.
,
Allende Prieto
C.
,
2006
,
MNRAS
,
367
,
1329

Rejkuba
M.
,
Dubath
P.
,
Minniti
D.
,
Meylan
G.
,
2007
,
A&A
,
469
,
147

Rejkuba
M.
,
Harris
W. E.
,
Greggio
L.
,
Harris
G. L. H.
,
2011
,
A&A
,
526
,
A123

Romano
D.
,
Cescutti
G.
,
Matteucci
F.
,
2011
,
MNRAS
,
418
,
696

Sakari
C. M.
,
Venn
K. A.
,
Mackey
D.
,
Shetrone
M. D.
,
Dotter
A.
,
Ferguson
A. M. N.
,
Huxor
A.
,
2015
,
MNRAS
,
448
,
1314

Salpeter
E. E.
,
1955
,
ApJ
,
121
,
161

Sarajedini
A.
et al. ,
2007
,
AJ
,
133
,
1658

Schiavon
R. P.
,
Rose
J. A.
,
Courteau
S.
,
MacArthur
L. A.
,
2005
,
ApJS
,
160
,
163

Searle
L.
,
1971
,
ApJ
,
168
,
327

Shetrone
M. D.
,
1996
,
AJ
,
112
,
2639

Shetrone
M. D.
,
2004
, in
McWilliam
A.
,
Rauch
M.
Eds.,
Origin and Evolution of the Elements from the Carnegie Observatories Centennial Symposia
,
Cambridge Univ. Press
,
Cambridge, UK
, p.
220

Shetrone
M. D.
,
Bolte
M.
,
Stetson
P. B.
,
1998
,
AJ
,
115
,
1888

Shetrone
M.
,
Venn
K. A.
,
Tolstoy
E.
,
Primas
F.
,
Hill
V.
,
Kaufer
A.
,
2003
,
AJ
,
125
,
684

Sobeck
J. S.
,
Ivans
I. I.
,
Simmerer
J. A.
,
Sneden
C.
,
Hoeflich
P.
,
Hoeflich
J. P.
,
Kraft
R. P.
,
2006
,
AJ
,
131
,
2949

Stasińska
G.
,
2005
,
A&A
,
434
,
507

Strader
J.
,
Brodie
J. P.
,
Cenarro
A. J.
,
Beasley
M. A.
,
Forbes
D. A.
,
2005
,
AJ
,
130
,
1315

Takeda
Y.
,
Sato
B.
,
Kambe
E.
,
Sadakane
K.
,
Ohkubo
M.
,
2002
,
PASJ
,
54
,
1041

Taylor
M. A.
,
Puzia
T. H.
,
Harris
G. L. H.
,
Harris
W. E.
,
Kissler-Patig
M.
,
Hilker
M.
,
2010
,
ApJ
,
712
,
119

Thomas
D.
,
Maraston
C.
,
Bender
R.
,
2002
,
Ap&SS
,
281
,
371

Thomas
D.
,
Maraston
C.
,
Bender
R.
,
de Oliveira
C. M.
,
2005
,
ApJ
,
621
,
673

Timmes
F. X.
,
Woosley
S. E.
,
Weaver
T. A.
,
1995
,
ApJS
,
98
,
617

Tolstoy
E.
,
2003
, in
Livio
M.
,
Noll
K.
,
Stiavelli
M.
, eds,
A Decade of Hubble Space Telescope Science
.
Cambridge Univ. Press
,
Cambridge, UK
, p.
128

Trager
S. C.
,
Worthey
G.
,
Faber
S. M.
,
Burstein
D.
,
González
J. J.
,
1998
,
ApJS
,
116
,
1

Trager
S. C.
,
Faber
S. M.
,
Worthey
G.
,
González
J. J.
,
2000
,
AJ
,
120
,
165

van den Bosch
R.
,
de Zeeuw
T.
,
Gebhardt
K.
,
Noyola
E.
,
van de Ven
G.
,
2006
,
ApJ
,
641
,
852

Venn
K. A.
,
1999
,
ApJ
,
518
,
405

Venn
K. A.
,
Irwin
M.
,
Shetrone
M. D.
,
Tout
C. A.
,
Hill
V.
,
Tolstoy
E.
,
2004
,
AJ
,
128
,
1177

Vernet
et al. ,
2011
,
A&A
,
536
,
A105

Wolf
B.
,
1973
,
A&A
,
28
,
335

Woodley
K. A.
,
Harris
W. E.
,
Puzia
T. H.
,
Gómez
M.
,
Harris
G. L. H.
,
Geisler
D.
,
2010
,
ApJ
,
708
,
1335

Woosley
S. E.
,
Weaver
T. A.
,
1995
,
ApJS
,
101
,
181

Worthey
G.
,
1998
,
PASP
,
110
,
888

Worthey
G.
,
Faber
S. M.
,
González
J. J.
,
1992
,
ApJ
,
398
,
69

Worthey
G.
,
Faber
S. M.
,
Gonzá lez
J. J.
,
Burstein
D.
,
1994
,
ApJS
,
94
,
687

APPENDIX A: METALLICITIES AS A FUNCTION OF WAVELENGTH

We present tables displaying the individual bin measurements for each of the YMCs studied in this work. Additionally, to visually appreciate the dispersion between the individual measurements for a corresponding element with multiple bins, in Figs A1A5, we plot bin abundances as a function of wavelength for a selected sample of GCs.

[Mg/Fe] abundances as a function of wavelength for a selected sample of GCs in NGC 5128.
Figure A1.

[Mg/Fe] abundances as a function of wavelength for a selected sample of GCs in NGC 5128.

[Ca/Fe] abundances as a function of wavelength for a selected sample of GCs in NGC 5128.
Figure A2.

[Ca/Fe] abundances as a function of wavelength for a selected sample of GCs in NGC 5128.

[Ti/Fe] abundances as a function of wavelength for a selected sample of GCs in NGC 5128.
Figure A3.

[Ti/Fe] abundances as a function of wavelength for a selected sample of GCs in NGC 5128.

[Cr/Fe] abundances as a function of wavelength for a selected sample of GCs in NGC 5128.
Figure A4.

[Cr/Fe] abundances as a function of wavelength for a selected sample of GCs in NGC 5128.

[Ni/Fe] abundances as a function of wavelength for a selected sample of GCs in NGC 5128.
Figure A5.

[Ni/Fe] abundances as a function of wavelength for a selected sample of GCs in NGC 5128.

Table A1.

Chemical abundances AAT117062.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.2650.021
4600.0–4800.0−1.1940.033
4800.0–5000.0−1.1240.021
5000.0–5200.0−1.1840.031
6100.0–6300.0−1.1660.041
6300.0–6500.0−1.1540.042
6500.0–6700.0−1.2250.048
6700.0–6800.0−0.9740.112
7400.0–7550.0−1.1660.061
8500.0–8700.0−0.8340.031
8700.0–8850.0−0.9840.091
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7610.054
4690.0–4710.0+0.1620.146
5150.0–5200.0+0.4110.058
8777.0–8832.0+0.4210.066
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.0620.120
6100.0–6128.0+0.5950.083
6430.0–6454.0+0.6820.113
6459.0–6478.0+0.2820.175
8480.0–8586.0+0.2340.037
8623.0–8697.0+0.2520.038
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.4210.088
4440.0–4474.0−0.0500.115
4650.0–4718.0+0.2110.090
4980.0–5045.0+0.3410.062
6584.0–6780.0+0.7810.080
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.3220.112
4640.0–4675.0+0.3500.087
4915.0–4930.0+0.0810.323
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.4380.205
4750.0–4770.0−0.0300.115
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.1110.157
4910.0–4955.0+0.3910.091
5075.0–5175.0+0.0410.078
6100.0–6200.0+0.2710.130
6760.0–6800.0+0.0580.201
7700.0–7800.0−0.0180.195
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.2650.021
4600.0–4800.0−1.1940.033
4800.0–5000.0−1.1240.021
5000.0–5200.0−1.1840.031
6100.0–6300.0−1.1660.041
6300.0–6500.0−1.1540.042
6500.0–6700.0−1.2250.048
6700.0–6800.0−0.9740.112
7400.0–7550.0−1.1660.061
8500.0–8700.0−0.8340.031
8700.0–8850.0−0.9840.091
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7610.054
4690.0–4710.0+0.1620.146
5150.0–5200.0+0.4110.058
8777.0–8832.0+0.4210.066
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.0620.120
6100.0–6128.0+0.5950.083
6430.0–6454.0+0.6820.113
6459.0–6478.0+0.2820.175
8480.0–8586.0+0.2340.037
8623.0–8697.0+0.2520.038
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.4210.088
4440.0–4474.0−0.0500.115
4650.0–4718.0+0.2110.090
4980.0–5045.0+0.3410.062
6584.0–6780.0+0.7810.080
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.3220.112
4640.0–4675.0+0.3500.087
4915.0–4930.0+0.0810.323
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.4380.205
4750.0–4770.0−0.0300.115
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.1110.157
4910.0–4955.0+0.3910.091
5075.0–5175.0+0.0410.078
6100.0–6200.0+0.2710.130
6760.0–6800.0+0.0580.201
7700.0–7800.0−0.0180.195
Table A1.

Chemical abundances AAT117062.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.2650.021
4600.0–4800.0−1.1940.033
4800.0–5000.0−1.1240.021
5000.0–5200.0−1.1840.031
6100.0–6300.0−1.1660.041
6300.0–6500.0−1.1540.042
6500.0–6700.0−1.2250.048
6700.0–6800.0−0.9740.112
7400.0–7550.0−1.1660.061
8500.0–8700.0−0.8340.031
8700.0–8850.0−0.9840.091
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7610.054
4690.0–4710.0+0.1620.146
5150.0–5200.0+0.4110.058
8777.0–8832.0+0.4210.066
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.0620.120
6100.0–6128.0+0.5950.083
6430.0–6454.0+0.6820.113
6459.0–6478.0+0.2820.175
8480.0–8586.0+0.2340.037
8623.0–8697.0+0.2520.038
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.4210.088
4440.0–4474.0−0.0500.115
4650.0–4718.0+0.2110.090
4980.0–5045.0+0.3410.062
6584.0–6780.0+0.7810.080
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.3220.112
4640.0–4675.0+0.3500.087
4915.0–4930.0+0.0810.323
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.4380.205
4750.0–4770.0−0.0300.115
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.1110.157
4910.0–4955.0+0.3910.091
5075.0–5175.0+0.0410.078
6100.0–6200.0+0.2710.130
6760.0–6800.0+0.0580.201
7700.0–7800.0−0.0180.195
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.2650.021
4600.0–4800.0−1.1940.033
4800.0–5000.0−1.1240.021
5000.0–5200.0−1.1840.031
6100.0–6300.0−1.1660.041
6300.0–6500.0−1.1540.042
6500.0–6700.0−1.2250.048
6700.0–6800.0−0.9740.112
7400.0–7550.0−1.1660.061
8500.0–8700.0−0.8340.031
8700.0–8850.0−0.9840.091
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7610.054
4690.0–4710.0+0.1620.146
5150.0–5200.0+0.4110.058
8777.0–8832.0+0.4210.066
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.0620.120
6100.0–6128.0+0.5950.083
6430.0–6454.0+0.6820.113
6459.0–6478.0+0.2820.175
8480.0–8586.0+0.2340.037
8623.0–8697.0+0.2520.038
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.4210.088
4440.0–4474.0−0.0500.115
4650.0–4718.0+0.2110.090
4980.0–5045.0+0.3410.062
6584.0–6780.0+0.7810.080
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.3220.112
4640.0–4675.0+0.3500.087
4915.0–4930.0+0.0810.323
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.4380.205
4750.0–4770.0−0.0300.115
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.1110.157
4910.0–4955.0+0.3910.091
5075.0–5175.0+0.0410.078
6100.0–6200.0+0.2710.130
6760.0–6800.0+0.0580.201
7700.0–7800.0−0.0180.195
Table A2.

Chemical abundances HGHH-04.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−2.0040.082
4600.0–4800.0−1.8240.092
4800.0–5000.0−1.9040.062
5000.0–5200.0−1.9450.061
6100.0–6300.0−1.5350.091
6300.0–6500.0−2.0140.112
6500.0–6700.0−1.9630.192
6700.0–6800.0−1.8340.322
7400.0–7550.0−2.1840.212
8500.0–8700.0−2.3230.112
8700.0–8850.0−1.8650.181
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0
4690.0–4710.0+0.1160.355
5150.0–5200.0+0.4670.083
8777.0–8832.0−0.0930.337
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.0830.385
6100.0–6128.0+0.7780.219
6430.0–6454.0+0.7780.229
6459.0–6478.0+0.0460.572
8480.0–8586.0+0.5270.057
8623.0–8697.0+0.5070.064
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.6080.191
4440.0–4474.0+0.7070.21
4650.0–4718.0+0.3670.238
4980.0–5045.0+0.4370.143
6584.0–6780.0+0.2671.791
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.0980.278
4640.0–4675.0+0.1180.376
4915.0–4930.0+0.6871.212
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1532.173
4750.0–4770.0−0.7320.545
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.2970.356
4910.0–4955.0+0.0670.844
5075.0–5175.0−0.1920.278
6100.0–6200.0−0.0040.355
6760.0–6800.0−0.2230.605
7700.0–7800.0+0.3280.386
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−2.0040.082
4600.0–4800.0−1.8240.092
4800.0–5000.0−1.9040.062
5000.0–5200.0−1.9450.061
6100.0–6300.0−1.5350.091
6300.0–6500.0−2.0140.112
6500.0–6700.0−1.9630.192
6700.0–6800.0−1.8340.322
7400.0–7550.0−2.1840.212
8500.0–8700.0−2.3230.112
8700.0–8850.0−1.8650.181
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0
4690.0–4710.0+0.1160.355
5150.0–5200.0+0.4670.083
8777.0–8832.0−0.0930.337
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.0830.385
6100.0–6128.0+0.7780.219
6430.0–6454.0+0.7780.229
6459.0–6478.0+0.0460.572
8480.0–8586.0+0.5270.057
8623.0–8697.0+0.5070.064
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.6080.191
4440.0–4474.0+0.7070.21
4650.0–4718.0+0.3670.238
4980.0–5045.0+0.4370.143
6584.0–6780.0+0.2671.791
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.0980.278
4640.0–4675.0+0.1180.376
4915.0–4930.0+0.6871.212
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1532.173
4750.0–4770.0−0.7320.545
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.2970.356
4910.0–4955.0+0.0670.844
5075.0–5175.0−0.1920.278
6100.0–6200.0−0.0040.355
6760.0–6800.0−0.2230.605
7700.0–7800.0+0.3280.386
Table A2.

Chemical abundances HGHH-04.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−2.0040.082
4600.0–4800.0−1.8240.092
4800.0–5000.0−1.9040.062
5000.0–5200.0−1.9450.061
6100.0–6300.0−1.5350.091
6300.0–6500.0−2.0140.112
6500.0–6700.0−1.9630.192
6700.0–6800.0−1.8340.322
7400.0–7550.0−2.1840.212
8500.0–8700.0−2.3230.112
8700.0–8850.0−1.8650.181
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0
4690.0–4710.0+0.1160.355
5150.0–5200.0+0.4670.083
8777.0–8832.0−0.0930.337
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.0830.385
6100.0–6128.0+0.7780.219
6430.0–6454.0+0.7780.229
6459.0–6478.0+0.0460.572
8480.0–8586.0+0.5270.057
8623.0–8697.0+0.5070.064
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.6080.191
4440.0–4474.0+0.7070.21
4650.0–4718.0+0.3670.238
4980.0–5045.0+0.4370.143
6584.0–6780.0+0.2671.791
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.0980.278
4640.0–4675.0+0.1180.376
4915.0–4930.0+0.6871.212
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1532.173
4750.0–4770.0−0.7320.545
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.2970.356
4910.0–4955.0+0.0670.844
5075.0–5175.0−0.1920.278
6100.0–6200.0−0.0040.355
6760.0–6800.0−0.2230.605
7700.0–7800.0+0.3280.386
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−2.0040.082
4600.0–4800.0−1.8240.092
4800.0–5000.0−1.9040.062
5000.0–5200.0−1.9450.061
6100.0–6300.0−1.5350.091
6300.0–6500.0−2.0140.112
6500.0–6700.0−1.9630.192
6700.0–6800.0−1.8340.322
7400.0–7550.0−2.1840.212
8500.0–8700.0−2.3230.112
8700.0–8850.0−1.8650.181
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0
4690.0–4710.0+0.1160.355
5150.0–5200.0+0.4670.083
8777.0–8832.0−0.0930.337
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.0830.385
6100.0–6128.0+0.7780.219
6430.0–6454.0+0.7780.229
6459.0–6478.0+0.0460.572
8480.0–8586.0+0.5270.057
8623.0–8697.0+0.5070.064
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.6080.191
4440.0–4474.0+0.7070.21
4650.0–4718.0+0.3670.238
4980.0–5045.0+0.4370.143
6584.0–6780.0+0.2671.791
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.0980.278
4640.0–4675.0+0.1180.376
4915.0–4930.0+0.6871.212
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1532.173
4750.0–4770.0−0.7320.545
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.2970.356
4910.0–4955.0+0.0670.844
5075.0–5175.0−0.1920.278
6100.0–6200.0−0.0040.355
6760.0–6800.0−0.2230.605
7700.0–7800.0+0.3280.386
Table A3.

Chemical abundances HGHH-06.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.9550.041
4600.0–4800.0−0.8550.063
4800.0–5000.0−0.8760.038
5000.0–5200.0−0.9950.061
6100.0–6300.0−0.8860.076
6300.0–6500.0−0.9250.090
6500.0–6700.0−0.9550.109
6700.0–6800.0−1.0550.241
7400.0–7550.0−0.8350.090
8500.0–8700.0−0.9960.067
8700.0–8850.0−0.8240.136
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7920.092
4690.0–4710.0+0.5230.166
5150.0–5200.0+0.6320.054
8777.0–8832.0+0.5840.084
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.0770.211
6100.0–6128.0+0.8570.096
6430.0–6454.0+0.7930.134
6459.0–6478.0+0.0540.293
8480.0–8586.0+0.3460.025
8623.0–8697.0+0.3040.024
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.0630.178
4440.0–4474.0+0.0840.172
4650.0–4718.0+0.4830.122
4980.0–5045.0+0.2930.074
6584.0–6780.0+0.5030.114
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.0120.141
4640.0–4675.0+0.2920.144
4915.0–4930.0+0.4330.492
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.7360.451
4750.0–4770.0−0.1490.208
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.0030.269
4910.0–4955.0+0.5930.147
5075.0–5175.0+0.2430.103
6100.0–6200.0+0.1230.192
6760.0–6800.0−0.4870.281
7700.0–7800.0+0.2140.282
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.9550.041
4600.0–4800.0−0.8550.063
4800.0–5000.0−0.8760.038
5000.0–5200.0−0.9950.061
6100.0–6300.0−0.8860.076
6300.0–6500.0−0.9250.090
6500.0–6700.0−0.9550.109
6700.0–6800.0−1.0550.241
7400.0–7550.0−0.8350.090
8500.0–8700.0−0.9960.067
8700.0–8850.0−0.8240.136
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7920.092
4690.0–4710.0+0.5230.166
5150.0–5200.0+0.6320.054
8777.0–8832.0+0.5840.084
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.0770.211
6100.0–6128.0+0.8570.096
6430.0–6454.0+0.7930.134
6459.0–6478.0+0.0540.293
8480.0–8586.0+0.3460.025
8623.0–8697.0+0.3040.024
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.0630.178
4440.0–4474.0+0.0840.172
4650.0–4718.0+0.4830.122
4980.0–5045.0+0.2930.074
6584.0–6780.0+0.5030.114
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.0120.141
4640.0–4675.0+0.2920.144
4915.0–4930.0+0.4330.492
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.7360.451
4750.0–4770.0−0.1490.208
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.0030.269
4910.0–4955.0+0.5930.147
5075.0–5175.0+0.2430.103
6100.0–6200.0+0.1230.192
6760.0–6800.0−0.4870.281
7700.0–7800.0+0.2140.282
Table A3.

Chemical abundances HGHH-06.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.9550.041
4600.0–4800.0−0.8550.063
4800.0–5000.0−0.8760.038
5000.0–5200.0−0.9950.061
6100.0–6300.0−0.8860.076
6300.0–6500.0−0.9250.090
6500.0–6700.0−0.9550.109
6700.0–6800.0−1.0550.241
7400.0–7550.0−0.8350.090
8500.0–8700.0−0.9960.067
8700.0–8850.0−0.8240.136
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7920.092
4690.0–4710.0+0.5230.166
5150.0–5200.0+0.6320.054
8777.0–8832.0+0.5840.084
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.0770.211
6100.0–6128.0+0.8570.096
6430.0–6454.0+0.7930.134
6459.0–6478.0+0.0540.293
8480.0–8586.0+0.3460.025
8623.0–8697.0+0.3040.024
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.0630.178
4440.0–4474.0+0.0840.172
4650.0–4718.0+0.4830.122
4980.0–5045.0+0.2930.074
6584.0–6780.0+0.5030.114
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.0120.141
4640.0–4675.0+0.2920.144
4915.0–4930.0+0.4330.492
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.7360.451
4750.0–4770.0−0.1490.208
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.0030.269
4910.0–4955.0+0.5930.147
5075.0–5175.0+0.2430.103
6100.0–6200.0+0.1230.192
6760.0–6800.0−0.4870.281
7700.0–7800.0+0.2140.282
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.9550.041
4600.0–4800.0−0.8550.063
4800.0–5000.0−0.8760.038
5000.0–5200.0−0.9950.061
6100.0–6300.0−0.8860.076
6300.0–6500.0−0.9250.090
6500.0–6700.0−0.9550.109
6700.0–6800.0−1.0550.241
7400.0–7550.0−0.8350.090
8500.0–8700.0−0.9960.067
8700.0–8850.0−0.8240.136
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7920.092
4690.0–4710.0+0.5230.166
5150.0–5200.0+0.6320.054
8777.0–8832.0+0.5840.084
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.0770.211
6100.0–6128.0+0.8570.096
6430.0–6454.0+0.7930.134
6459.0–6478.0+0.0540.293
8480.0–8586.0+0.3460.025
8623.0–8697.0+0.3040.024
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.0630.178
4440.0–4474.0+0.0840.172
4650.0–4718.0+0.4830.122
4980.0–5045.0+0.2930.074
6584.0–6780.0+0.5030.114
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.0120.141
4640.0–4675.0+0.2920.144
4915.0–4930.0+0.4330.492
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.7360.451
4750.0–4770.0−0.1490.208
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.0030.269
4910.0–4955.0+0.5930.147
5075.0–5175.0+0.2430.103
6100.0–6200.0+0.1230.192
6760.0–6800.0−0.4870.281
7700.0–7800.0+0.2140.282
Table A4.

Chemical abundances HGHH-07.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.2840.025
4600.0–4800.0−1.1120.033
4800.0–5000.0−1.0860.023
5000.0–5200.0−1.1340.026
6100.0–6300.0−1.0130.043
6300.0–6500.0−0.9290.050
6500.0–6700.0−1.0550.078
6700.0–6800.0−1.2440.172
7400.0–7550.0−1.1250.076
8500.0–8700.0−1.1960.046
8700.0–8850.0−0.8860.090
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.9240.064
4690.0–4710.0+0.4560.116
5150.0–5200.0+0.4860.041
8777.0–8832.0+0.3760.070
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.1160.116
6100.0–6128.0+0.8070.077
6430.0–6454.0+0.5960.125
6459.0–6478.0−0.0050.219
8480.0–8586.0+0.5050.036
8623.0–8697.0+0.4360.036
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.1040.133
4440.0–4474.0+0.0560.120
4650.0–4718.0+0.4840.087
4980.0–5045.0+0.2150.070
6584.0–6780.0+0.4140.109
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.1450.193
6148.0–6168.0+0.5340.292
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0540.097
4640.0–4675.0+0.2240.129
4915.0–4930.0+0.5850.276
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.5050.252
4750.0–4770.0+0.0650.134
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.0440.194
4910.0–4955.0+0.2240.134
5075.0–5175.0−0.0050.095
6100.0–6200.0+0.2450.146
6760.0–6800.0+0.4950.193
7700.0–7800.0+0.0470.222
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.2840.025
4600.0–4800.0−1.1120.033
4800.0–5000.0−1.0860.023
5000.0–5200.0−1.1340.026
6100.0–6300.0−1.0130.043
6300.0–6500.0−0.9290.050
6500.0–6700.0−1.0550.078
6700.0–6800.0−1.2440.172
7400.0–7550.0−1.1250.076
8500.0–8700.0−1.1960.046
8700.0–8850.0−0.8860.090
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.9240.064
4690.0–4710.0+0.4560.116
5150.0–5200.0+0.4860.041
8777.0–8832.0+0.3760.070
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.1160.116
6100.0–6128.0+0.8070.077
6430.0–6454.0+0.5960.125
6459.0–6478.0−0.0050.219
8480.0–8586.0+0.5050.036
8623.0–8697.0+0.4360.036
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.1040.133
4440.0–4474.0+0.0560.120
4650.0–4718.0+0.4840.087
4980.0–5045.0+0.2150.070
6584.0–6780.0+0.4140.109
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.1450.193
6148.0–6168.0+0.5340.292
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0540.097
4640.0–4675.0+0.2240.129
4915.0–4930.0+0.5850.276
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.5050.252
4750.0–4770.0+0.0650.134
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.0440.194
4910.0–4955.0+0.2240.134
5075.0–5175.0−0.0050.095
6100.0–6200.0+0.2450.146
6760.0–6800.0+0.4950.193
7700.0–7800.0+0.0470.222
Table A4.

Chemical abundances HGHH-07.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.2840.025
4600.0–4800.0−1.1120.033
4800.0–5000.0−1.0860.023
5000.0–5200.0−1.1340.026
6100.0–6300.0−1.0130.043
6300.0–6500.0−0.9290.050
6500.0–6700.0−1.0550.078
6700.0–6800.0−1.2440.172
7400.0–7550.0−1.1250.076
8500.0–8700.0−1.1960.046
8700.0–8850.0−0.8860.090
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.9240.064
4690.0–4710.0+0.4560.116
5150.0–5200.0+0.4860.041
8777.0–8832.0+0.3760.070
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.1160.116
6100.0–6128.0+0.8070.077
6430.0–6454.0+0.5960.125
6459.0–6478.0−0.0050.219
8480.0–8586.0+0.5050.036
8623.0–8697.0+0.4360.036
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.1040.133
4440.0–4474.0+0.0560.120
4650.0–4718.0+0.4840.087
4980.0–5045.0+0.2150.070
6584.0–6780.0+0.4140.109
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.1450.193
6148.0–6168.0+0.5340.292
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0540.097
4640.0–4675.0+0.2240.129
4915.0–4930.0+0.5850.276
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.5050.252
4750.0–4770.0+0.0650.134
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.0440.194
4910.0–4955.0+0.2240.134
5075.0–5175.0−0.0050.095
6100.0–6200.0+0.2450.146
6760.0–6800.0+0.4950.193
7700.0–7800.0+0.0470.222
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.2840.025
4600.0–4800.0−1.1120.033
4800.0–5000.0−1.0860.023
5000.0–5200.0−1.1340.026
6100.0–6300.0−1.0130.043
6300.0–6500.0−0.9290.050
6500.0–6700.0−1.0550.078
6700.0–6800.0−1.2440.172
7400.0–7550.0−1.1250.076
8500.0–8700.0−1.1960.046
8700.0–8850.0−0.8860.090
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.9240.064
4690.0–4710.0+0.4560.116
5150.0–5200.0+0.4860.041
8777.0–8832.0+0.3760.070
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.1160.116
6100.0–6128.0+0.8070.077
6430.0–6454.0+0.5960.125
6459.0–6478.0−0.0050.219
8480.0–8586.0+0.5050.036
8623.0–8697.0+0.4360.036
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.1040.133
4440.0–4474.0+0.0560.120
4650.0–4718.0+0.4840.087
4980.0–5045.0+0.2150.070
6584.0–6780.0+0.4140.109
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.1450.193
6148.0–6168.0+0.5340.292
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0540.097
4640.0–4675.0+0.2240.129
4915.0–4930.0+0.5850.276
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.5050.252
4750.0–4770.0+0.0650.134
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.0440.194
4910.0–4955.0+0.2240.134
5075.0–5175.0−0.0050.095
6100.0–6200.0+0.2450.146
6760.0–6800.0+0.4950.193
7700.0–7800.0+0.0470.222
Table A5.

Chemical abundances HGHH-11.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.4440.012
4600.0–4800.0−0.1260.028
4800.0–5000.0−0.5850.021
5000.0–5200.0−0.6240.031
6100.0–6300.0−0.5740.042
6300.0–6500.0−0.5460.047
6500.0–6700.0−0.7550.079
6700.0–6800.0−0.6540.092
7400.0–7550.0−0.6560.058
8500.0–8700.0−0.4840.042
8700.0–8850.0−0.6240.07
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.4000.112
4690.0–4710.0+0.0810.128
5150.0–5200.0+0.4680.061
8777.0–8832.0+0.0900.069
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.0040.126
6100.0–6128.0+0.1030.089
6430.0–6454.0−0.0200.112
6459.0–6478.0−0.6490.224
8480.0–8586.0−0.0760.046
8623.0–8697.0−0.1200.047
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.1600.158
4440.0–4474.0+0.0000.130
4650.0–4718.0+0.2600.098
4980.0–5045.0+0.2300.084
6584.0–6780.0−0.5110.215
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.0640.184
6148.0–6168.0−0.0590.326
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.2410.102
4640.0–4675.0−0.0220.094
4915.0–4930.0−0.1510.323
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1580.180
4750.0–4770.0+0.4190.119
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.1590.166
4910.0–4955.0+0.3190.119
5075.0–5175.0−0.2520.118
6100.0–6200.0+0.2220.122
6760.0–6800.0−0.2600.206
7700.0–7800.0+0.1450.200
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.4440.012
4600.0–4800.0−0.1260.028
4800.0–5000.0−0.5850.021
5000.0–5200.0−0.6240.031
6100.0–6300.0−0.5740.042
6300.0–6500.0−0.5460.047
6500.0–6700.0−0.7550.079
6700.0–6800.0−0.6540.092
7400.0–7550.0−0.6560.058
8500.0–8700.0−0.4840.042
8700.0–8850.0−0.6240.07
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.4000.112
4690.0–4710.0+0.0810.128
5150.0–5200.0+0.4680.061
8777.0–8832.0+0.0900.069
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.0040.126
6100.0–6128.0+0.1030.089
6430.0–6454.0−0.0200.112
6459.0–6478.0−0.6490.224
8480.0–8586.0−0.0760.046
8623.0–8697.0−0.1200.047
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.1600.158
4440.0–4474.0+0.0000.130
4650.0–4718.0+0.2600.098
4980.0–5045.0+0.2300.084
6584.0–6780.0−0.5110.215
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.0640.184
6148.0–6168.0−0.0590.326
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.2410.102
4640.0–4675.0−0.0220.094
4915.0–4930.0−0.1510.323
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1580.180
4750.0–4770.0+0.4190.119
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.1590.166
4910.0–4955.0+0.3190.119
5075.0–5175.0−0.2520.118
6100.0–6200.0+0.2220.122
6760.0–6800.0−0.2600.206
7700.0–7800.0+0.1450.200
Table A5.

Chemical abundances HGHH-11.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.4440.012
4600.0–4800.0−0.1260.028
4800.0–5000.0−0.5850.021
5000.0–5200.0−0.6240.031
6100.0–6300.0−0.5740.042
6300.0–6500.0−0.5460.047
6500.0–6700.0−0.7550.079
6700.0–6800.0−0.6540.092
7400.0–7550.0−0.6560.058
8500.0–8700.0−0.4840.042
8700.0–8850.0−0.6240.07
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.4000.112
4690.0–4710.0+0.0810.128
5150.0–5200.0+0.4680.061
8777.0–8832.0+0.0900.069
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.0040.126
6100.0–6128.0+0.1030.089
6430.0–6454.0−0.0200.112
6459.0–6478.0−0.6490.224
8480.0–8586.0−0.0760.046
8623.0–8697.0−0.1200.047
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.1600.158
4440.0–4474.0+0.0000.130
4650.0–4718.0+0.2600.098
4980.0–5045.0+0.2300.084
6584.0–6780.0−0.5110.215
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.0640.184
6148.0–6168.0−0.0590.326
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.2410.102
4640.0–4675.0−0.0220.094
4915.0–4930.0−0.1510.323
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1580.180
4750.0–4770.0+0.4190.119
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.1590.166
4910.0–4955.0+0.3190.119
5075.0–5175.0−0.2520.118
6100.0–6200.0+0.2220.122
6760.0–6800.0−0.2600.206
7700.0–7800.0+0.1450.200
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.4440.012
4600.0–4800.0−0.1260.028
4800.0–5000.0−0.5850.021
5000.0–5200.0−0.6240.031
6100.0–6300.0−0.5740.042
6300.0–6500.0−0.5460.047
6500.0–6700.0−0.7550.079
6700.0–6800.0−0.6540.092
7400.0–7550.0−0.6560.058
8500.0–8700.0−0.4840.042
8700.0–8850.0−0.6240.07
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.4000.112
4690.0–4710.0+0.0810.128
5150.0–5200.0+0.4680.061
8777.0–8832.0+0.0900.069
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.0040.126
6100.0–6128.0+0.1030.089
6430.0–6454.0−0.0200.112
6459.0–6478.0−0.6490.224
8480.0–8586.0−0.0760.046
8623.0–8697.0−0.1200.047
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.1600.158
4440.0–4474.0+0.0000.130
4650.0–4718.0+0.2600.098
4980.0–5045.0+0.2300.084
6584.0–6780.0−0.5110.215
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.0640.184
6148.0–6168.0−0.0590.326
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.2410.102
4640.0–4675.0−0.0220.094
4915.0–4930.0−0.1510.323
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1580.180
4750.0–4770.0+0.4190.119
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.1590.166
4910.0–4955.0+0.3190.119
5075.0–5175.0−0.2520.118
6100.0–6200.0+0.2220.122
6760.0–6800.0−0.2600.206
7700.0–7800.0+0.1450.200
Table A6.

Chemical abundances HGHH-17.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.1940.022
4600.0–4800.0−1.0800.035
4800.0–5000.0−1.0550.030
5000.0–5200.0−1.0250.030
6100.0–6300.0−0.9460.044
6300.0–6500.0−1.1240.052
6500.0–6700.0−1.1140.071
6700.0–6800.0−0.9740.102
7400.0–7550.0−0.9970.069
8500.0–8700.0−1.1260.037
8700.0–8850.0−0.9340.066
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7550.062
4690.0–4710.0+0.2760.134
5150.0–5200.0+0.4850.031
8777.0–8832.0+0.5960.066
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.3160.094
6100.0–6128.0+0.4920.085
6430.0–6454.0+0.7450.104
6459.0–6478.0+0.1670.172
8480.0–8586.0+0.4550.026
8623.0–8697.0+0.4270.027
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.2150.104
4440.0–4474.0+0.1260.120
4650.0–4718.0+0.4260.084
4980.0–5045.0+0.2660.056
6584.0–6780.0+0.2260.124
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.0430.189
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0840.105
4640.0–4675.0+0.2150.098
4915.0–4930.0+0.9350.202
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.2350.175
4750.0–4770.0+0.0950.130
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.1740.143
4910.0–4955.0+0.1550.122
5075.0–5175.0−0.0040.075
6100.0–6200.0+0.3840.112
6760.0–6800.0+0.3870.164
7700.0–7800.0+0.1680.196
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.1940.022
4600.0–4800.0−1.0800.035
4800.0–5000.0−1.0550.030
5000.0–5200.0−1.0250.030
6100.0–6300.0−0.9460.044
6300.0–6500.0−1.1240.052
6500.0–6700.0−1.1140.071
6700.0–6800.0−0.9740.102
7400.0–7550.0−0.9970.069
8500.0–8700.0−1.1260.037
8700.0–8850.0−0.9340.066
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7550.062
4690.0–4710.0+0.2760.134
5150.0–5200.0+0.4850.031
8777.0–8832.0+0.5960.066
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.3160.094
6100.0–6128.0+0.4920.085
6430.0–6454.0+0.7450.104
6459.0–6478.0+0.1670.172
8480.0–8586.0+0.4550.026
8623.0–8697.0+0.4270.027
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.2150.104
4440.0–4474.0+0.1260.120
4650.0–4718.0+0.4260.084
4980.0–5045.0+0.2660.056
6584.0–6780.0+0.2260.124
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.0430.189
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0840.105
4640.0–4675.0+0.2150.098
4915.0–4930.0+0.9350.202
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.2350.175
4750.0–4770.0+0.0950.130
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.1740.143
4910.0–4955.0+0.1550.122
5075.0–5175.0−0.0040.075
6100.0–6200.0+0.3840.112
6760.0–6800.0+0.3870.164
7700.0–7800.0+0.1680.196
Table A6.

Chemical abundances HGHH-17.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.1940.022
4600.0–4800.0−1.0800.035
4800.0–5000.0−1.0550.030
5000.0–5200.0−1.0250.030
6100.0–6300.0−0.9460.044
6300.0–6500.0−1.1240.052
6500.0–6700.0−1.1140.071
6700.0–6800.0−0.9740.102
7400.0–7550.0−0.9970.069
8500.0–8700.0−1.1260.037
8700.0–8850.0−0.9340.066
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7550.062
4690.0–4710.0+0.2760.134
5150.0–5200.0+0.4850.031
8777.0–8832.0+0.5960.066
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.3160.094
6100.0–6128.0+0.4920.085
6430.0–6454.0+0.7450.104
6459.0–6478.0+0.1670.172
8480.0–8586.0+0.4550.026
8623.0–8697.0+0.4270.027
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.2150.104
4440.0–4474.0+0.1260.120
4650.0–4718.0+0.4260.084
4980.0–5045.0+0.2660.056
6584.0–6780.0+0.2260.124
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.0430.189
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0840.105
4640.0–4675.0+0.2150.098
4915.0–4930.0+0.9350.202
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.2350.175
4750.0–4770.0+0.0950.130
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.1740.143
4910.0–4955.0+0.1550.122
5075.0–5175.0−0.0040.075
6100.0–6200.0+0.3840.112
6760.0–6800.0+0.3870.164
7700.0–7800.0+0.1680.196
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.1940.022
4600.0–4800.0−1.0800.035
4800.0–5000.0−1.0550.030
5000.0–5200.0−1.0250.030
6100.0–6300.0−0.9460.044
6300.0–6500.0−1.1240.052
6500.0–6700.0−1.1140.071
6700.0–6800.0−0.9740.102
7400.0–7550.0−0.9970.069
8500.0–8700.0−1.1260.037
8700.0–8850.0−0.9340.066
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7550.062
4690.0–4710.0+0.2760.134
5150.0–5200.0+0.4850.031
8777.0–8832.0+0.5960.066
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.3160.094
6100.0–6128.0+0.4920.085
6430.0–6454.0+0.7450.104
6459.0–6478.0+0.1670.172
8480.0–8586.0+0.4550.026
8623.0–8697.0+0.4270.027
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.2150.104
4440.0–4474.0+0.1260.120
4650.0–4718.0+0.4260.084
4980.0–5045.0+0.2660.056
6584.0–6780.0+0.2260.124
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.0430.189
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0840.105
4640.0–4675.0+0.2150.098
4915.0–4930.0+0.9350.202
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.2350.175
4750.0–4770.0+0.0950.130
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.1740.143
4910.0–4955.0+0.1550.122
5075.0–5175.0−0.0040.075
6100.0–6200.0+0.3840.112
6760.0–6800.0+0.3870.164
7700.0–7800.0+0.1680.196
Table A7.

Chemical abundances HGHH-21.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.0450.031
4600.0–4800.0−0.9650.051
4800.0–5000.0−0.8960.029
5000.0–5200.0−0.9550.041
6100.0–6300.0−0.9850.060
6300.0–6500.0−0.9340.062
6500.0–6700.0−0.9390.093
6700.0–6800.0−1.2550.161
7400.0–7550.0−0.9260.074
8500.0–8700.0−0.9450.058
8700.0–8850.0−0.6650.101
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.5310.102
4690.0–4710.0+0.2530.177
5150.0–5200.0+0.6160.059
8777.0–8832.0+0.4310.073
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2820.128
6100.0–6128.0+0.5620.103
6430.0–6454.0+0.6530.138
6459.0–6478.0+0.1010.233
8480.0–8586.0+0.2920.039
8623.0–8697.0+0.3330.040
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.2100.168
4440.0–4474.0+0.1520.137
4650.0–4718.0+0.5320.100
4980.0–5045.0+0.2820.079
6584.0–6780.0+0.7080.088
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.1420.117
4640.0–4675.0+0.1510.127
4915.0–4930.0+0.8520.293
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.2410.191
4750.0–4770.0+0.1230.166
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.6460.405
4910.0–4955.0+0.4720.128
5075.0–5175.0−0.1380.117
6100.0–6200.0+0.4920.137
6760.0–6800.0+0.5040.217
7700.0–7800.0+0.2460.257
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.0450.031
4600.0–4800.0−0.9650.051
4800.0–5000.0−0.8960.029
5000.0–5200.0−0.9550.041
6100.0–6300.0−0.9850.060
6300.0–6500.0−0.9340.062
6500.0–6700.0−0.9390.093
6700.0–6800.0−1.2550.161
7400.0–7550.0−0.9260.074
8500.0–8700.0−0.9450.058
8700.0–8850.0−0.6650.101
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.5310.102
4690.0–4710.0+0.2530.177
5150.0–5200.0+0.6160.059
8777.0–8832.0+0.4310.073
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2820.128
6100.0–6128.0+0.5620.103
6430.0–6454.0+0.6530.138
6459.0–6478.0+0.1010.233
8480.0–8586.0+0.2920.039
8623.0–8697.0+0.3330.040
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.2100.168
4440.0–4474.0+0.1520.137
4650.0–4718.0+0.5320.100
4980.0–5045.0+0.2820.079
6584.0–6780.0+0.7080.088
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.1420.117
4640.0–4675.0+0.1510.127
4915.0–4930.0+0.8520.293
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.2410.191
4750.0–4770.0+0.1230.166
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.6460.405
4910.0–4955.0+0.4720.128
5075.0–5175.0−0.1380.117
6100.0–6200.0+0.4920.137
6760.0–6800.0+0.5040.217
7700.0–7800.0+0.2460.257
Table A7.

Chemical abundances HGHH-21.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.0450.031
4600.0–4800.0−0.9650.051
4800.0–5000.0−0.8960.029
5000.0–5200.0−0.9550.041
6100.0–6300.0−0.9850.060
6300.0–6500.0−0.9340.062
6500.0–6700.0−0.9390.093
6700.0–6800.0−1.2550.161
7400.0–7550.0−0.9260.074
8500.0–8700.0−0.9450.058
8700.0–8850.0−0.6650.101
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.5310.102
4690.0–4710.0+0.2530.177
5150.0–5200.0+0.6160.059
8777.0–8832.0+0.4310.073
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2820.128
6100.0–6128.0+0.5620.103
6430.0–6454.0+0.6530.138
6459.0–6478.0+0.1010.233
8480.0–8586.0+0.2920.039
8623.0–8697.0+0.3330.040
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.2100.168
4440.0–4474.0+0.1520.137
4650.0–4718.0+0.5320.100
4980.0–5045.0+0.2820.079
6584.0–6780.0+0.7080.088
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.1420.117
4640.0–4675.0+0.1510.127
4915.0–4930.0+0.8520.293
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.2410.191
4750.0–4770.0+0.1230.166
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.6460.405
4910.0–4955.0+0.4720.128
5075.0–5175.0−0.1380.117
6100.0–6200.0+0.4920.137
6760.0–6800.0+0.5040.217
7700.0–7800.0+0.2460.257
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.0450.031
4600.0–4800.0−0.9650.051
4800.0–5000.0−0.8960.029
5000.0–5200.0−0.9550.041
6100.0–6300.0−0.9850.060
6300.0–6500.0−0.9340.062
6500.0–6700.0−0.9390.093
6700.0–6800.0−1.2550.161
7400.0–7550.0−0.9260.074
8500.0–8700.0−0.9450.058
8700.0–8850.0−0.6650.101
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.5310.102
4690.0–4710.0+0.2530.177
5150.0–5200.0+0.6160.059
8777.0–8832.0+0.4310.073
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2820.128
6100.0–6128.0+0.5620.103
6430.0–6454.0+0.6530.138
6459.0–6478.0+0.1010.233
8480.0–8586.0+0.2920.039
8623.0–8697.0+0.3330.040
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.2100.168
4440.0–4474.0+0.1520.137
4650.0–4718.0+0.5320.100
4980.0–5045.0+0.2820.079
6584.0–6780.0+0.7080.088
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.1420.117
4640.0–4675.0+0.1510.127
4915.0–4930.0+0.8520.293
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.2410.191
4750.0–4770.0+0.1230.166
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.6460.405
4910.0–4955.0+0.4720.128
5075.0–5175.0−0.1380.117
6100.0–6200.0+0.4920.137
6760.0–6800.0+0.5040.217
7700.0–7800.0+0.2460.257
Table A8.

Chemical abundances HGHH-23.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.4350.011
4600.0–4800.0−0.4450.030
4800.0–5000.0−0.5350.010
5000.0–5200.0−0.4450.021
6100.0–6300.0−0.3920.024
6300.0–6500.0−0.4150.039
6500.0–6700.0−0.2650.040
6700.0–6800.0−0.3840.052
7400.0–7550.0−0.5870.046
8500.0–8700.0−0.1350.011
8700.0–8850.0−0.3130.052
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.5210.051
4690.0–4710.0−0.1180.097
5150.0–5200.0+0.2920.042
8777.0–8832.0+0.1260.047
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.1170.070
6100.0–6128.0+0.1780.066
6430.0–6454.0+0.3210.077
6459.0–6478.0−0.4260.172
8480.0–8586.0+0.0120.034
8623.0–8697.0−0.0370.035
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0
4440.0–4474.0−0.1360.088
4650.0–4718.0+0.1630.062
4980.0–5045.0+0.1930.062
6584.0–6780.0−0.1570.117
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.3240.127
6148.0–6168.0+0.4890.180
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.2870.074
4640.0–4675.0+0.2930.058
4915.0–4930.0−0.2080.243
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.2860.117
4750.0–4770.0+0.2820.075
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.4220.112
4910.0–4955.0+0.2200.088
5075.0–5175.0−0.3450.071
6100.0–6200.0−0.3680.103
6760.06800.0
7700.07800.0−0.4580.163
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.4350.011
4600.0–4800.0−0.4450.030
4800.0–5000.0−0.5350.010
5000.0–5200.0−0.4450.021
6100.0–6300.0−0.3920.024
6300.0–6500.0−0.4150.039
6500.0–6700.0−0.2650.040
6700.0–6800.0−0.3840.052
7400.0–7550.0−0.5870.046
8500.0–8700.0−0.1350.011
8700.0–8850.0−0.3130.052
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.5210.051
4690.0–4710.0−0.1180.097
5150.0–5200.0+0.2920.042
8777.0–8832.0+0.1260.047
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.1170.070
6100.0–6128.0+0.1780.066
6430.0–6454.0+0.3210.077
6459.0–6478.0−0.4260.172
8480.0–8586.0+0.0120.034
8623.0–8697.0−0.0370.035
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0
4440.0–4474.0−0.1360.088
4650.0–4718.0+0.1630.062
4980.0–5045.0+0.1930.062
6584.0–6780.0−0.1570.117
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.3240.127
6148.0–6168.0+0.4890.180
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.2870.074
4640.0–4675.0+0.2930.058
4915.0–4930.0−0.2080.243
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.2860.117
4750.0–4770.0+0.2820.075
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.4220.112
4910.0–4955.0+0.2200.088
5075.0–5175.0−0.3450.071
6100.0–6200.0−0.3680.103
6760.06800.0
7700.07800.0−0.4580.163
Table A8.

Chemical abundances HGHH-23.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.4350.011
4600.0–4800.0−0.4450.030
4800.0–5000.0−0.5350.010
5000.0–5200.0−0.4450.021
6100.0–6300.0−0.3920.024
6300.0–6500.0−0.4150.039
6500.0–6700.0−0.2650.040
6700.0–6800.0−0.3840.052
7400.0–7550.0−0.5870.046
8500.0–8700.0−0.1350.011
8700.0–8850.0−0.3130.052
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.5210.051
4690.0–4710.0−0.1180.097
5150.0–5200.0+0.2920.042
8777.0–8832.0+0.1260.047
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.1170.070
6100.0–6128.0+0.1780.066
6430.0–6454.0+0.3210.077
6459.0–6478.0−0.4260.172
8480.0–8586.0+0.0120.034
8623.0–8697.0−0.0370.035
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0
4440.0–4474.0−0.1360.088
4650.0–4718.0+0.1630.062
4980.0–5045.0+0.1930.062
6584.0–6780.0−0.1570.117
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.3240.127
6148.0–6168.0+0.4890.180
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.2870.074
4640.0–4675.0+0.2930.058
4915.0–4930.0−0.2080.243
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.2860.117
4750.0–4770.0+0.2820.075
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.4220.112
4910.0–4955.0+0.2200.088
5075.0–5175.0−0.3450.071
6100.0–6200.0−0.3680.103
6760.06800.0
7700.07800.0−0.4580.163
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.4350.011
4600.0–4800.0−0.4450.030
4800.0–5000.0−0.5350.010
5000.0–5200.0−0.4450.021
6100.0–6300.0−0.3920.024
6300.0–6500.0−0.4150.039
6500.0–6700.0−0.2650.040
6700.0–6800.0−0.3840.052
7400.0–7550.0−0.5870.046
8500.0–8700.0−0.1350.011
8700.0–8850.0−0.3130.052
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.5210.051
4690.0–4710.0−0.1180.097
5150.0–5200.0+0.2920.042
8777.0–8832.0+0.1260.047
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.1170.070
6100.0–6128.0+0.1780.066
6430.0–6454.0+0.3210.077
6459.0–6478.0−0.4260.172
8480.0–8586.0+0.0120.034
8623.0–8697.0−0.0370.035
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0
4440.0–4474.0−0.1360.088
4650.0–4718.0+0.1630.062
4980.0–5045.0+0.1930.062
6584.0–6780.0−0.1570.117
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.3240.127
6148.0–6168.0+0.4890.180
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.2870.074
4640.0–4675.0+0.2930.058
4915.0–4930.0−0.2080.243
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.2860.117
4750.0–4770.0+0.2820.075
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.4220.112
4910.0–4955.0+0.2200.088
5075.0–5175.0−0.3450.071
6100.0–6200.0−0.3680.103
6760.06800.0
7700.07800.0−0.4580.163
Table A9.

Chemical abundances HGHH-29.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.4640.029
4600.0–4800.0−0.4640.032
4800.0–5000.0−0.5460.025
5000.0–5200.0−0.5640.032
6100.0–6300.0−0.5750.040
6300.0–6500.0−0.5450.048
6500.0–6700.0−0.4740.062
6700.0–6800.0−0.6340.111
7400.0–7550.0−0.5550.060
8500.0–8700.0−0.4050.051
8700.0–8850.0−0.3350.061
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3930.119
4690.0–4710.0+0.1940.133
5150.0–5200.0+0.4630.046
8777.0–8832.0+0.4250.055
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.074 00.146
6100.0–6128.0+0.1740.084
6430.0–6454.0+0.2910.110
6459.0–6478.0+0.1500.177
8480.0–8586.0+0.0650.027
8623.0–8697.0−0.0260.020
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.0040.151
4440.0–4474.0+0.1740.129
4650.0–4718.0+0.4050.104
4980.0–5045.0+0.3130.084
6584.0–6780.0+0.3230.140
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.0750.104
4640.0–4675.0+0.4350.095
4915.0–4930.0−0.5460.491
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1050.202
4750.0–4770.0+0.3440.141
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.2420.189
4910.0–4955.0+0.4230.141
5075.0–5175.0−0.1160.112
6100.0–6200.0−0.1980.153
6760.0–6800.0−0.0540.203
7700.0–7800.0+0.6830.171
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.4640.029
4600.0–4800.0−0.4640.032
4800.0–5000.0−0.5460.025
5000.0–5200.0−0.5640.032
6100.0–6300.0−0.5750.040
6300.0–6500.0−0.5450.048
6500.0–6700.0−0.4740.062
6700.0–6800.0−0.6340.111
7400.0–7550.0−0.5550.060
8500.0–8700.0−0.4050.051
8700.0–8850.0−0.3350.061
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3930.119
4690.0–4710.0+0.1940.133
5150.0–5200.0+0.4630.046
8777.0–8832.0+0.4250.055
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.074 00.146
6100.0–6128.0+0.1740.084
6430.0–6454.0+0.2910.110
6459.0–6478.0+0.1500.177
8480.0–8586.0+0.0650.027
8623.0–8697.0−0.0260.020
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.0040.151
4440.0–4474.0+0.1740.129
4650.0–4718.0+0.4050.104
4980.0–5045.0+0.3130.084
6584.0–6780.0+0.3230.140
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.0750.104
4640.0–4675.0+0.4350.095
4915.0–4930.0−0.5460.491
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1050.202
4750.0–4770.0+0.3440.141
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.2420.189
4910.0–4955.0+0.4230.141
5075.0–5175.0−0.1160.112
6100.0–6200.0−0.1980.153
6760.0–6800.0−0.0540.203
7700.0–7800.0+0.6830.171
Table A9.

Chemical abundances HGHH-29.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.4640.029
4600.0–4800.0−0.4640.032
4800.0–5000.0−0.5460.025
5000.0–5200.0−0.5640.032
6100.0–6300.0−0.5750.040
6300.0–6500.0−0.5450.048
6500.0–6700.0−0.4740.062
6700.0–6800.0−0.6340.111
7400.0–7550.0−0.5550.060
8500.0–8700.0−0.4050.051
8700.0–8850.0−0.3350.061
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3930.119
4690.0–4710.0+0.1940.133
5150.0–5200.0+0.4630.046
8777.0–8832.0+0.4250.055
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.074 00.146
6100.0–6128.0+0.1740.084
6430.0–6454.0+0.2910.110
6459.0–6478.0+0.1500.177
8480.0–8586.0+0.0650.027
8623.0–8697.0−0.0260.020
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.0040.151
4440.0–4474.0+0.1740.129
4650.0–4718.0+0.4050.104
4980.0–5045.0+0.3130.084
6584.0–6780.0+0.3230.140
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.0750.104
4640.0–4675.0+0.4350.095
4915.0–4930.0−0.5460.491
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1050.202
4750.0–4770.0+0.3440.141
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.2420.189
4910.0–4955.0+0.4230.141
5075.0–5175.0−0.1160.112
6100.0–6200.0−0.1980.153
6760.0–6800.0−0.0540.203
7700.0–7800.0+0.6830.171
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.4640.029
4600.0–4800.0−0.4640.032
4800.0–5000.0−0.5460.025
5000.0–5200.0−0.5640.032
6100.0–6300.0−0.5750.040
6300.0–6500.0−0.5450.048
6500.0–6700.0−0.4740.062
6700.0–6800.0−0.6340.111
7400.0–7550.0−0.5550.060
8500.0–8700.0−0.4050.051
8700.0–8850.0−0.3350.061
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3930.119
4690.0–4710.0+0.1940.133
5150.0–5200.0+0.4630.046
8777.0–8832.0+0.4250.055
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.074 00.146
6100.0–6128.0+0.1740.084
6430.0–6454.0+0.2910.110
6459.0–6478.0+0.1500.177
8480.0–8586.0+0.0650.027
8623.0–8697.0−0.0260.020
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.0040.151
4440.0–4474.0+0.1740.129
4650.0–4718.0+0.4050.104
4980.0–5045.0+0.3130.084
6584.0–6780.0+0.3230.140
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.0750.104
4640.0–4675.0+0.4350.095
4915.0–4930.0−0.5460.491
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1050.202
4750.0–4770.0+0.3440.141
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.2420.189
4910.0–4955.0+0.4230.141
5075.0–5175.0−0.1160.112
6100.0–6200.0−0.1980.153
6760.0–6800.0−0.0540.203
7700.0–7800.0+0.6830.171
Table A10.

Chemical abundances HGHH-34.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.3950.021
4600.0–4800.0−0.4750.043
4800.0–5000.0−0.4350.011
5000.0–5200.0−0.3150.03
6100.0–6300.0−0.3840.021
6300.0–6500.0−0.3550.047
6500.0–6700.0−0.3750.081
6700.0–6800.0−0.3940.082
7400.0–7550.0−0.3450.050
8500.0–8700.0−0.1040.042
8700.0–8850.0−0.2920.082
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3810.083
4690.0–4710.0+0.1020.122
5150.0–5200.0+0.4820.057
8777.0–8832.0+0.1770.069
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2030.105
6100.0–6128.0+0.2630.092
6430.0–6454.0+0.2320.124
6459.0–6478.0+0.1530.193
8480.0–8586.0+0.0020.029
8623.0–8697.0−0.0470.031
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.2930.114
4440.0–4474.0−0.1580.123
4650.0–4718.0+0.2420.102
4980.0–5045.0+0.9420.067
6584.0–6780.0+0.1830.096
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0600.102
4640.0–4675.0+0.0380.106
4915.0–4930.0+0.5030.263
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.1120.183
4750.0–4770.0+0.2210.152
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.0910.182
4910.0–4955.0+0.4320.115
5075.0–5175.0+0.1530.085
6100.0–6200.0−0.0580.135
6760.0–6800.0+0.5200.187
7700.0–7800.0+0.4120.194
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.3950.021
4600.0–4800.0−0.4750.043
4800.0–5000.0−0.4350.011
5000.0–5200.0−0.3150.03
6100.0–6300.0−0.3840.021
6300.0–6500.0−0.3550.047
6500.0–6700.0−0.3750.081
6700.0–6800.0−0.3940.082
7400.0–7550.0−0.3450.050
8500.0–8700.0−0.1040.042
8700.0–8850.0−0.2920.082
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3810.083
4690.0–4710.0+0.1020.122
5150.0–5200.0+0.4820.057
8777.0–8832.0+0.1770.069
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2030.105
6100.0–6128.0+0.2630.092
6430.0–6454.0+0.2320.124
6459.0–6478.0+0.1530.193
8480.0–8586.0+0.0020.029
8623.0–8697.0−0.0470.031
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.2930.114
4440.0–4474.0−0.1580.123
4650.0–4718.0+0.2420.102
4980.0–5045.0+0.9420.067
6584.0–6780.0+0.1830.096
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0600.102
4640.0–4675.0+0.0380.106
4915.0–4930.0+0.5030.263
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.1120.183
4750.0–4770.0+0.2210.152
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.0910.182
4910.0–4955.0+0.4320.115
5075.0–5175.0+0.1530.085
6100.0–6200.0−0.0580.135
6760.0–6800.0+0.5200.187
7700.0–7800.0+0.4120.194
Table A10.

Chemical abundances HGHH-34.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.3950.021
4600.0–4800.0−0.4750.043
4800.0–5000.0−0.4350.011
5000.0–5200.0−0.3150.03
6100.0–6300.0−0.3840.021
6300.0–6500.0−0.3550.047
6500.0–6700.0−0.3750.081
6700.0–6800.0−0.3940.082
7400.0–7550.0−0.3450.050
8500.0–8700.0−0.1040.042
8700.0–8850.0−0.2920.082
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3810.083
4690.0–4710.0+0.1020.122
5150.0–5200.0+0.4820.057
8777.0–8832.0+0.1770.069
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2030.105
6100.0–6128.0+0.2630.092
6430.0–6454.0+0.2320.124
6459.0–6478.0+0.1530.193
8480.0–8586.0+0.0020.029
8623.0–8697.0−0.0470.031
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.2930.114
4440.0–4474.0−0.1580.123
4650.0–4718.0+0.2420.102
4980.0–5045.0+0.9420.067
6584.0–6780.0+0.1830.096
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0600.102
4640.0–4675.0+0.0380.106
4915.0–4930.0+0.5030.263
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.1120.183
4750.0–4770.0+0.2210.152
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.0910.182
4910.0–4955.0+0.4320.115
5075.0–5175.0+0.1530.085
6100.0–6200.0−0.0580.135
6760.0–6800.0+0.5200.187
7700.0–7800.0+0.4120.194
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.3950.021
4600.0–4800.0−0.4750.043
4800.0–5000.0−0.4350.011
5000.0–5200.0−0.3150.03
6100.0–6300.0−0.3840.021
6300.0–6500.0−0.3550.047
6500.0–6700.0−0.3750.081
6700.0–6800.0−0.3940.082
7400.0–7550.0−0.3450.050
8500.0–8700.0−0.1040.042
8700.0–8850.0−0.2920.082
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3810.083
4690.0–4710.0+0.1020.122
5150.0–5200.0+0.4820.057
8777.0–8832.0+0.1770.069
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2030.105
6100.0–6128.0+0.2630.092
6430.0–6454.0+0.2320.124
6459.0–6478.0+0.1530.193
8480.0–8586.0+0.0020.029
8623.0–8697.0−0.0470.031
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.2930.114
4440.0–4474.0−0.1580.123
4650.0–4718.0+0.2420.102
4980.0–5045.0+0.9420.067
6584.0–6780.0+0.1830.096
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0600.102
4640.0–4675.0+0.0380.106
4915.0–4930.0+0.5030.263
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.1120.183
4750.0–4770.0+0.2210.152
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.0910.182
4910.0–4955.0+0.4320.115
5075.0–5175.0+0.1530.085
6100.0–6200.0−0.0580.135
6760.0–6800.0+0.5200.187
7700.0–7800.0+0.4120.194
Table A11.

Chemical abundances HGHH-40.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.2060.069
4600.0–4800.0−1.2230.083
4800.0–5000.0−1.0450.051
5000.0–5200.0−1.2550.080
6100.0–6300.0−1.1240.081
6300.0–6500.0−1.2050.120
6500.0–6700.0−0.9280.137
6700.0–6800.0−1.2540.233
7400.0–7550.0−0.8760.127
8500.0–8700.0−1.1550.104
8700.0–8850.0−1.2380.168
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.1180.332
4690.0–4710.0+0.1080.362
5150.0–5200.0+0.3370.097
8777.0–8832.0−0.0730.174
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.1620.374
6100.0–6128.0+0.2860.251
6430.0–6454.0+0.1160.302
6459.0–6478.0+0.1970.333
8480.0–8586.0+0.1970.046
8623.0–8697.0+0.1770.058
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.0020.254
4440.0–4474.0−0.3130.293
4650.0–4718.0+0.1180.222
4980.0–5045.0+0.4780.124
6584.0–6780.0
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.2070.193
4640.0–4675.0−0.5930.382
4915.0–4930.0
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.0720.393
4750.0–4770.0−0.1730.308
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0
4910.0–4955.0+0.6880.190
5075.0–5175.0−1.0230.472
6100.0–6200.0+0.0680.254
6760.0–6800.0+0.2060.350
7700.0–7800.0+0.2460.242
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.2060.069
4600.0–4800.0−1.2230.083
4800.0–5000.0−1.0450.051
5000.0–5200.0−1.2550.080
6100.0–6300.0−1.1240.081
6300.0–6500.0−1.2050.120
6500.0–6700.0−0.9280.137
6700.0–6800.0−1.2540.233
7400.0–7550.0−0.8760.127
8500.0–8700.0−1.1550.104
8700.0–8850.0−1.2380.168
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.1180.332
4690.0–4710.0+0.1080.362
5150.0–5200.0+0.3370.097
8777.0–8832.0−0.0730.174
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.1620.374
6100.0–6128.0+0.2860.251
6430.0–6454.0+0.1160.302
6459.0–6478.0+0.1970.333
8480.0–8586.0+0.1970.046
8623.0–8697.0+0.1770.058
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.0020.254
4440.0–4474.0−0.3130.293
4650.0–4718.0+0.1180.222
4980.0–5045.0+0.4780.124
6584.0–6780.0
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.2070.193
4640.0–4675.0−0.5930.382
4915.0–4930.0
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.0720.393
4750.0–4770.0−0.1730.308
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0
4910.0–4955.0+0.6880.190
5075.0–5175.0−1.0230.472
6100.0–6200.0+0.0680.254
6760.0–6800.0+0.2060.350
7700.0–7800.0+0.2460.242
Table A11.

Chemical abundances HGHH-40.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.2060.069
4600.0–4800.0−1.2230.083
4800.0–5000.0−1.0450.051
5000.0–5200.0−1.2550.080
6100.0–6300.0−1.1240.081
6300.0–6500.0−1.2050.120
6500.0–6700.0−0.9280.137
6700.0–6800.0−1.2540.233
7400.0–7550.0−0.8760.127
8500.0–8700.0−1.1550.104
8700.0–8850.0−1.2380.168
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.1180.332
4690.0–4710.0+0.1080.362
5150.0–5200.0+0.3370.097
8777.0–8832.0−0.0730.174
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.1620.374
6100.0–6128.0+0.2860.251
6430.0–6454.0+0.1160.302
6459.0–6478.0+0.1970.333
8480.0–8586.0+0.1970.046
8623.0–8697.0+0.1770.058
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.0020.254
4440.0–4474.0−0.3130.293
4650.0–4718.0+0.1180.222
4980.0–5045.0+0.4780.124
6584.0–6780.0
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.2070.193
4640.0–4675.0−0.5930.382
4915.0–4930.0
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.0720.393
4750.0–4770.0−0.1730.308
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0
4910.0–4955.0+0.6880.190
5075.0–5175.0−1.0230.472
6100.0–6200.0+0.0680.254
6760.0–6800.0+0.2060.350
7700.0–7800.0+0.2460.242
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.2060.069
4600.0–4800.0−1.2230.083
4800.0–5000.0−1.0450.051
5000.0–5200.0−1.2550.080
6100.0–6300.0−1.1240.081
6300.0–6500.0−1.2050.120
6500.0–6700.0−0.9280.137
6700.0–6800.0−1.2540.233
7400.0–7550.0−0.8760.127
8500.0–8700.0−1.1550.104
8700.0–8850.0−1.2380.168
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.1180.332
4690.0–4710.0+0.1080.362
5150.0–5200.0+0.3370.097
8777.0–8832.0−0.0730.174
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.1620.374
6100.0–6128.0+0.2860.251
6430.0–6454.0+0.1160.302
6459.0–6478.0+0.1970.333
8480.0–8586.0+0.1970.046
8623.0–8697.0+0.1770.058
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.0020.254
4440.0–4474.0−0.3130.293
4650.0–4718.0+0.1180.222
4980.0–5045.0+0.4780.124
6584.0–6780.0
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.2070.193
4640.0–4675.0−0.5930.382
4915.0–4930.0
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.0720.393
4750.0–4770.0−0.1730.308
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0
4910.0–4955.0+0.6880.190
5075.0–5175.0−1.0230.472
6100.0–6200.0+0.0680.254
6760.0–6800.0+0.2060.350
7700.0–7800.0+0.2460.242
Table A12.

Chemical abundances HH-080.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.8250.058
4600.0–4800.0−1.7160.075
4800.0–5000.0−1.6960.036
5000.0–5200.0−1.6960.045
6100.0–6300.0−1.5360.088
6300.0–6500.0−1.2860.077
6500.0–6700.0−1.4540.122
6700.0–6800.0−1.3260.442
7400.0–7550.0−1.1920.096
8500.0–8700.0−1.7140.102
8700.0–8850.0−1.4650.161
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3990.239
4690.0–4710.0−0.2930.256
5150.0–5200.0−0.1620.100
8777.0–8832.0+0.3570.159
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.0570.198
6100.0–6128.0−0.1100.211
6430.0–6454.0+0.01570.227
6459.0–6478.0+0.3350.255
8480.0–8586.0+0.2980.061
8623.0–8697.0+0.3170.061
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.0830.170
4440.0–4474.0−0.2230.199
4650.0–4718.0+0.0770.180
4980.0–5045.0+0.1990.094
6584.0–6780.0+0.5880.322
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0030.180
4640.0–4675.0−0.1540.246
4915.0–4930.0−0.0810.500
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.1880.263
4750.0–4770.0−0.1840.198
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.2420.390
4910.0–4955.0+0.0960.380
5075.0–5175.0−0.0430.149
6100.0–6200.0+0.5870.204
6760.0–6800.0+0.0100.329
7700.0–7800.0+0.2040.312
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.8250.058
4600.0–4800.0−1.7160.075
4800.0–5000.0−1.6960.036
5000.0–5200.0−1.6960.045
6100.0–6300.0−1.5360.088
6300.0–6500.0−1.2860.077
6500.0–6700.0−1.4540.122
6700.0–6800.0−1.3260.442
7400.0–7550.0−1.1920.096
8500.0–8700.0−1.7140.102
8700.0–8850.0−1.4650.161
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3990.239
4690.0–4710.0−0.2930.256
5150.0–5200.0−0.1620.100
8777.0–8832.0+0.3570.159
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.0570.198
6100.0–6128.0−0.1100.211
6430.0–6454.0+0.01570.227
6459.0–6478.0+0.3350.255
8480.0–8586.0+0.2980.061
8623.0–8697.0+0.3170.061
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.0830.170
4440.0–4474.0−0.2230.199
4650.0–4718.0+0.0770.180
4980.0–5045.0+0.1990.094
6584.0–6780.0+0.5880.322
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0030.180
4640.0–4675.0−0.1540.246
4915.0–4930.0−0.0810.500
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.1880.263
4750.0–4770.0−0.1840.198
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.2420.390
4910.0–4955.0+0.0960.380
5075.0–5175.0−0.0430.149
6100.0–6200.0+0.5870.204
6760.0–6800.0+0.0100.329
7700.0–7800.0+0.2040.312
Table A12.

Chemical abundances HH-080.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.8250.058
4600.0–4800.0−1.7160.075
4800.0–5000.0−1.6960.036
5000.0–5200.0−1.6960.045
6100.0–6300.0−1.5360.088
6300.0–6500.0−1.2860.077
6500.0–6700.0−1.4540.122
6700.0–6800.0−1.3260.442
7400.0–7550.0−1.1920.096
8500.0–8700.0−1.7140.102
8700.0–8850.0−1.4650.161
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3990.239
4690.0–4710.0−0.2930.256
5150.0–5200.0−0.1620.100
8777.0–8832.0+0.3570.159
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.0570.198
6100.0–6128.0−0.1100.211
6430.0–6454.0+0.01570.227
6459.0–6478.0+0.3350.255
8480.0–8586.0+0.2980.061
8623.0–8697.0+0.3170.061
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.0830.170
4440.0–4474.0−0.2230.199
4650.0–4718.0+0.0770.180
4980.0–5045.0+0.1990.094
6584.0–6780.0+0.5880.322
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0030.180
4640.0–4675.0−0.1540.246
4915.0–4930.0−0.0810.500
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.1880.263
4750.0–4770.0−0.1840.198
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.2420.390
4910.0–4955.0+0.0960.380
5075.0–5175.0−0.0430.149
6100.0–6200.0+0.5870.204
6760.0–6800.0+0.0100.329
7700.0–7800.0+0.2040.312
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.8250.058
4600.0–4800.0−1.7160.075
4800.0–5000.0−1.6960.036
5000.0–5200.0−1.6960.045
6100.0–6300.0−1.5360.088
6300.0–6500.0−1.2860.077
6500.0–6700.0−1.4540.122
6700.0–6800.0−1.3260.442
7400.0–7550.0−1.1920.096
8500.0–8700.0−1.7140.102
8700.0–8850.0−1.4650.161
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3990.239
4690.0–4710.0−0.2930.256
5150.0–5200.0−0.1620.100
8777.0–8832.0+0.3570.159
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.0570.198
6100.0–6128.0−0.1100.211
6430.0–6454.0+0.01570.227
6459.0–6478.0+0.3350.255
8480.0–8586.0+0.2980.061
8623.0–8697.0+0.3170.061
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.0830.170
4440.0–4474.0−0.2230.199
4650.0–4718.0+0.0770.180
4980.0–5045.0+0.1990.094
6584.0–6780.0+0.5880.322
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0030.180
4640.0–4675.0−0.1540.246
4915.0–4930.0−0.0810.500
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.1880.263
4750.0–4770.0−0.1840.198
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.2420.390
4910.0–4955.0+0.0960.380
5075.0–5175.0−0.0430.149
6100.0–6200.0+0.5870.204
6760.0–6800.0+0.0100.329
7700.0–7800.0+0.2040.312
Table A13.

Chemical abundances HH-096.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.2650.041
4600.0–4800.0−1.1850.041
4800.0–5000.0−1.2460.039
5000.0–5200.0−1.4240.042
6100.0–6300.0−1.0960.058
6300.0–6500.0−1.2950.070
6500.0–6700.0−1.4960.097
6700.0–6800.0−1.1940.162
7400.0–7550.0−1.5470.109
8500.0–8700.0−1.5480.067
8700.0–8850.0−1.1770.118
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7040.108
4690.0–4710.0+0.3170.217
5150.0–5200.0+0.3370.068
8777.0–8832.0−0.3230.157
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2160.167
6100.0–6128.0+0.3750.147
6430.0–6454.0+0.3980.169
6459.0–6478.0+0.2870.209
8480.0–8586.0+0.4060.046
8623.0–8697.0+0.2870.049
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.2360.147
4440.0–4474.0+0.4070.139
4650.0–4718.0+0.3470.120
4980.0–5045.0+0.1660.092
6584.0–6780.0+0.4540.229
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.0860.127
4640.0–4675.0+0.0250.185
4915.0–4930.0+0.3770.394
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.6240.502
4750.0–4770.0−0.1940.186
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.2130.326
4910.0–4955.0−0.1410.262
5075.0–5175.0+0.1950.120
6100.0–6200.0+0.1260.206
6760.0–6800.0+0.4030.232
7700.0–7800.0+0.0160.249
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.2650.041
4600.0–4800.0−1.1850.041
4800.0–5000.0−1.2460.039
5000.0–5200.0−1.4240.042
6100.0–6300.0−1.0960.058
6300.0–6500.0−1.2950.070
6500.0–6700.0−1.4960.097
6700.0–6800.0−1.1940.162
7400.0–7550.0−1.5470.109
8500.0–8700.0−1.5480.067
8700.0–8850.0−1.1770.118
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7040.108
4690.0–4710.0+0.3170.217
5150.0–5200.0+0.3370.068
8777.0–8832.0−0.3230.157
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2160.167
6100.0–6128.0+0.3750.147
6430.0–6454.0+0.3980.169
6459.0–6478.0+0.2870.209
8480.0–8586.0+0.4060.046
8623.0–8697.0+0.2870.049
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.2360.147
4440.0–4474.0+0.4070.139
4650.0–4718.0+0.3470.120
4980.0–5045.0+0.1660.092
6584.0–6780.0+0.4540.229
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.0860.127
4640.0–4675.0+0.0250.185
4915.0–4930.0+0.3770.394
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.6240.502
4750.0–4770.0−0.1940.186
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.2130.326
4910.0–4955.0−0.1410.262
5075.0–5175.0+0.1950.120
6100.0–6200.0+0.1260.206
6760.0–6800.0+0.4030.232
7700.0–7800.0+0.0160.249
Table A13.

Chemical abundances HH-096.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.2650.041
4600.0–4800.0−1.1850.041
4800.0–5000.0−1.2460.039
5000.0–5200.0−1.4240.042
6100.0–6300.0−1.0960.058
6300.0–6500.0−1.2950.070
6500.0–6700.0−1.4960.097
6700.0–6800.0−1.1940.162
7400.0–7550.0−1.5470.109
8500.0–8700.0−1.5480.067
8700.0–8850.0−1.1770.118
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7040.108
4690.0–4710.0+0.3170.217
5150.0–5200.0+0.3370.068
8777.0–8832.0−0.3230.157
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2160.167
6100.0–6128.0+0.3750.147
6430.0–6454.0+0.3980.169
6459.0–6478.0+0.2870.209
8480.0–8586.0+0.4060.046
8623.0–8697.0+0.2870.049
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.2360.147
4440.0–4474.0+0.4070.139
4650.0–4718.0+0.3470.120
4980.0–5045.0+0.1660.092
6584.0–6780.0+0.4540.229
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.0860.127
4640.0–4675.0+0.0250.185
4915.0–4930.0+0.3770.394
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.6240.502
4750.0–4770.0−0.1940.186
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.2130.326
4910.0–4955.0−0.1410.262
5075.0–5175.0+0.1950.120
6100.0–6200.0+0.1260.206
6760.0–6800.0+0.4030.232
7700.0–7800.0+0.0160.249
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.2650.041
4600.0–4800.0−1.1850.041
4800.0–5000.0−1.2460.039
5000.0–5200.0−1.4240.042
6100.0–6300.0−1.0960.058
6300.0–6500.0−1.2950.070
6500.0–6700.0−1.4960.097
6700.0–6800.0−1.1940.162
7400.0–7550.0−1.5470.109
8500.0–8700.0−1.5480.067
8700.0–8850.0−1.1770.118
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7040.108
4690.0–4710.0+0.3170.217
5150.0–5200.0+0.3370.068
8777.0–8832.0−0.3230.157
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2160.167
6100.0–6128.0+0.3750.147
6430.0–6454.0+0.3980.169
6459.0–6478.0+0.2870.209
8480.0–8586.0+0.4060.046
8623.0–8697.0+0.2870.049
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.2360.147
4440.0–4474.0+0.4070.139
4650.0–4718.0+0.3470.120
4980.0–5045.0+0.1660.092
6584.0–6780.0+0.4540.229
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0+0.0860.127
4640.0–4675.0+0.0250.185
4915.0–4930.0+0.3770.394
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.6240.502
4750.0–4770.0−0.1940.186
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.2130.326
4910.0–4955.0−0.1410.262
5075.0–5175.0+0.1950.120
6100.0–6200.0+0.1260.206
6760.0–6800.0+0.4030.232
7700.0–7800.0+0.0160.249
Table A14.

Chemical abundances HHH86-30.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.3160.029
4600.0–4800.0−0.2750.011
4800.0–5000.0−0.3550.021
5000.0–5200.0−0.3350.011
6100.0–6300.0−0.1870.038
6300.0–6500.0−0.3960.030
6500.0–6700.0−0.2750.041
6700.0–6800.0−0.5640.062
7400.0–7550.0−0.3340.032
8500.0–8700.0+0.0350.021
8700.0–8850.0−0.3950.051
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.2400.058
4690.0–4710.0+0.1290.073
5150.0–5200.0+0.3710.046
8777.0–8832.0+0.2310.047
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.0090.082
6100.0–6128.0+0.3400.073
6430.0–6454.0+0.3990.081
6459.0–6478.0−0.3080.168
8480.0–8586.0−0.1290.042
8623.0–8697.0−0.1900.041
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.0620.089
4440.0–4474.0−0.1700.090
4650.0–4718.0+0.2810.066
4980.0–5045.0+0.4210.059
6584.0–6780.0+0.3720.092
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.1990.138
6148.0–6168.0+0.3900.203
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0390.066
4640.0–4675.0+0.4250.059
4915.0–4930.0+0.4600.155
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.2680.120
4750.0–4770.0+0.1300.099
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.0610.109
4910.0–4955.0+0.0710.082
5075.0–5175.0+0.0910.058
6100.0–6200.0+0.1810.090
6760.0–6800.0+0.2320.138
7700.0–7800.0−0.1300.165
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.3160.029
4600.0–4800.0−0.2750.011
4800.0–5000.0−0.3550.021
5000.0–5200.0−0.3350.011
6100.0–6300.0−0.1870.038
6300.0–6500.0−0.3960.030
6500.0–6700.0−0.2750.041
6700.0–6800.0−0.5640.062
7400.0–7550.0−0.3340.032
8500.0–8700.0+0.0350.021
8700.0–8850.0−0.3950.051
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.2400.058
4690.0–4710.0+0.1290.073
5150.0–5200.0+0.3710.046
8777.0–8832.0+0.2310.047
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.0090.082
6100.0–6128.0+0.3400.073
6430.0–6454.0+0.3990.081
6459.0–6478.0−0.3080.168
8480.0–8586.0−0.1290.042
8623.0–8697.0−0.1900.041
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.0620.089
4440.0–4474.0−0.1700.090
4650.0–4718.0+0.2810.066
4980.0–5045.0+0.4210.059
6584.0–6780.0+0.3720.092
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.1990.138
6148.0–6168.0+0.3900.203
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0390.066
4640.0–4675.0+0.4250.059
4915.0–4930.0+0.4600.155
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.2680.120
4750.0–4770.0+0.1300.099
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.0610.109
4910.0–4955.0+0.0710.082
5075.0–5175.0+0.0910.058
6100.0–6200.0+0.1810.090
6760.0–6800.0+0.2320.138
7700.0–7800.0−0.1300.165
Table A14.

Chemical abundances HHH86-30.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.3160.029
4600.0–4800.0−0.2750.011
4800.0–5000.0−0.3550.021
5000.0–5200.0−0.3350.011
6100.0–6300.0−0.1870.038
6300.0–6500.0−0.3960.030
6500.0–6700.0−0.2750.041
6700.0–6800.0−0.5640.062
7400.0–7550.0−0.3340.032
8500.0–8700.0+0.0350.021
8700.0–8850.0−0.3950.051
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.2400.058
4690.0–4710.0+0.1290.073
5150.0–5200.0+0.3710.046
8777.0–8832.0+0.2310.047
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.0090.082
6100.0–6128.0+0.3400.073
6430.0–6454.0+0.3990.081
6459.0–6478.0−0.3080.168
8480.0–8586.0−0.1290.042
8623.0–8697.0−0.1900.041
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.0620.089
4440.0–4474.0−0.1700.090
4650.0–4718.0+0.2810.066
4980.0–5045.0+0.4210.059
6584.0–6780.0+0.3720.092
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.1990.138
6148.0–6168.0+0.3900.203
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0390.066
4640.0–4675.0+0.4250.059
4915.0–4930.0+0.4600.155
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.2680.120
4750.0–4770.0+0.1300.099
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.0610.109
4910.0–4955.0+0.0710.082
5075.0–5175.0+0.0910.058
6100.0–6200.0+0.1810.090
6760.0–6800.0+0.2320.138
7700.0–7800.0−0.1300.165
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.3160.029
4600.0–4800.0−0.2750.011
4800.0–5000.0−0.3550.021
5000.0–5200.0−0.3350.011
6100.0–6300.0−0.1870.038
6300.0–6500.0−0.3960.030
6500.0–6700.0−0.2750.041
6700.0–6800.0−0.5640.062
7400.0–7550.0−0.3340.032
8500.0–8700.0+0.0350.021
8700.0–8850.0−0.3950.051
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.2400.058
4690.0–4710.0+0.1290.073
5150.0–5200.0+0.3710.046
8777.0–8832.0+0.2310.047
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.0090.082
6100.0–6128.0+0.3400.073
6430.0–6454.0+0.3990.081
6459.0–6478.0−0.3080.168
8480.0–8586.0−0.1290.042
8623.0–8697.0−0.1900.041
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.0620.089
4440.0–4474.0−0.1700.090
4650.0–4718.0+0.2810.066
4980.0–5045.0+0.4210.059
6584.0–6780.0+0.3720.092
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.1990.138
6148.0–6168.0+0.3900.203
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0390.066
4640.0–4675.0+0.4250.059
4915.0–4930.0+0.4600.155
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.2680.120
4750.0–4770.0+0.1300.099
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.0610.109
4910.0–4955.0+0.0710.082
5075.0–5175.0+0.0910.058
6100.0–6200.0+0.1810.090
6760.0–6800.0+0.2320.138
7700.0–7800.0−0.1300.165
Table A15.

Chemical abundances HHH86-39.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.0640.012
4600.0–4800.0−1.5540.031
4800.0–5000.0−1.0240.021
5000.0–5200.0−1.1740.021
6100.0–6300.0−1.5250.021
6300.0–6500.0−1.4950.030
6500.0–6700.0−1.5740.062
6700.0–6800.0−1.9130.146
7400.0–7550.0−1.3540.031
8500.0–8700.0−1.5950.031
8700.0–8850.0−1.6250.041
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0
4690.0–4710.0
5150.0–5200.0
8777.0–8832.0
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+1.1170.090
6100.0–6128.0+0.7270.092
6430.0–6454.0+0.4250.110
6459.0–6478.0+0.0130.124
8480.0–8586.0+0.0770.074
8623.0–8697.0+0.0280.076
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.4370.089
4440.0–4474.0−0.0040.120
4650.0–4718.0−0.6500.144
4980.0–5045.0+0.2660.084
6584.0–6780.0−0.7020.282
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0−0.0320.125
6148.0–6168.0−0.1910.282
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.3710.110
4640.0–4675.0−0.2220.118
4915.0–4930.0
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.7590.248
4750.0–4770.0−0.2520.119
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.3570.117
4910.0–4955.0−0.0430.128
5075.0–5175.0−0.1530.095
6100.0–6200.0−0.4420.148
6760.0–6800.0−0.3350.162
7700.0–7800.0−0.5650.140
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.0640.012
4600.0–4800.0−1.5540.031
4800.0–5000.0−1.0240.021
5000.0–5200.0−1.1740.021
6100.0–6300.0−1.5250.021
6300.0–6500.0−1.4950.030
6500.0–6700.0−1.5740.062
6700.0–6800.0−1.9130.146
7400.0–7550.0−1.3540.031
8500.0–8700.0−1.5950.031
8700.0–8850.0−1.6250.041
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0
4690.0–4710.0
5150.0–5200.0
8777.0–8832.0
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+1.1170.090
6100.0–6128.0+0.7270.092
6430.0–6454.0+0.4250.110
6459.0–6478.0+0.0130.124
8480.0–8586.0+0.0770.074
8623.0–8697.0+0.0280.076
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.4370.089
4440.0–4474.0−0.0040.120
4650.0–4718.0−0.6500.144
4980.0–5045.0+0.2660.084
6584.0–6780.0−0.7020.282
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0−0.0320.125
6148.0–6168.0−0.1910.282
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.3710.110
4640.0–4675.0−0.2220.118
4915.0–4930.0
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.7590.248
4750.0–4770.0−0.2520.119
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.3570.117
4910.0–4955.0−0.0430.128
5075.0–5175.0−0.1530.095
6100.0–6200.0−0.4420.148
6760.0–6800.0−0.3350.162
7700.0–7800.0−0.5650.140
Table A15.

Chemical abundances HHH86-39.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.0640.012
4600.0–4800.0−1.5540.031
4800.0–5000.0−1.0240.021
5000.0–5200.0−1.1740.021
6100.0–6300.0−1.5250.021
6300.0–6500.0−1.4950.030
6500.0–6700.0−1.5740.062
6700.0–6800.0−1.9130.146
7400.0–7550.0−1.3540.031
8500.0–8700.0−1.5950.031
8700.0–8850.0−1.6250.041
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0
4690.0–4710.0
5150.0–5200.0
8777.0–8832.0
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+1.1170.090
6100.0–6128.0+0.7270.092
6430.0–6454.0+0.4250.110
6459.0–6478.0+0.0130.124
8480.0–8586.0+0.0770.074
8623.0–8697.0+0.0280.076
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.4370.089
4440.0–4474.0−0.0040.120
4650.0–4718.0−0.6500.144
4980.0–5045.0+0.2660.084
6584.0–6780.0−0.7020.282
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0−0.0320.125
6148.0–6168.0−0.1910.282
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.3710.110
4640.0–4675.0−0.2220.118
4915.0–4930.0
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.7590.248
4750.0–4770.0−0.2520.119
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.3570.117
4910.0–4955.0−0.0430.128
5075.0–5175.0−0.1530.095
6100.0–6200.0−0.4420.148
6760.0–6800.0−0.3350.162
7700.0–7800.0−0.5650.140
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.0640.012
4600.0–4800.0−1.5540.031
4800.0–5000.0−1.0240.021
5000.0–5200.0−1.1740.021
6100.0–6300.0−1.5250.021
6300.0–6500.0−1.4950.030
6500.0–6700.0−1.5740.062
6700.0–6800.0−1.9130.146
7400.0–7550.0−1.3540.031
8500.0–8700.0−1.5950.031
8700.0–8850.0−1.6250.041
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0
4690.0–4710.0
5150.0–5200.0
8777.0–8832.0
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+1.1170.090
6100.0–6128.0+0.7270.092
6430.0–6454.0+0.4250.110
6459.0–6478.0+0.0130.124
8480.0–8586.0+0.0770.074
8623.0–8697.0+0.0280.076
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.4370.089
4440.0–4474.0−0.0040.120
4650.0–4718.0−0.6500.144
4980.0–5045.0+0.2660.084
6584.0–6780.0−0.7020.282
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0−0.0320.125
6148.0–6168.0−0.1910.282
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.3710.110
4640.0–4675.0−0.2220.118
4915.0–4930.0
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.7590.248
4750.0–4770.0−0.2520.119
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.3570.117
4910.0–4955.0−0.0430.128
5075.0–5175.0−0.1530.095
6100.0–6200.0−0.4420.148
6760.0–6800.0−0.3350.162
7700.0–7800.0−0.5650.140
Table A16.

Chemical abundances K-029.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.7740.021
4600.0–4800.0−0.8050.041
4800.0–5000.0−0.7750.030
5000.0–5200.0−0.7440.021
6100.0–6300.0−0.6960.046
6300.0–6500.0−0.6900.050
6500.0–6700.0−0.7140.062
6700.0–6800.0−0.6440.111
7400.0–7550.0−0.6850.062
8500.0–8700.0−0.6640.042
8700.0–8850.0−0.5070.078
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7670.074
4690.0–4710.0+0.3580.114
5150.0–5200.0+0.4060.046
8777.0–8832.0+0.3170.061
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.04350.141
6100.0–6128.0+0.5130.080
6430.0–6454.0+0.3600.118
6459.0–6478.0−0.4370.248
8480.0–8586.0+0.1680.025
8623.0–8697.0+0.1380.025
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.1230.146
4440.0–4474.0−0.2450.148
4650.0–4718.0+0.3280.094
4980.0–5045.0+0.3280.065
6584.0–6780.0+0.1770.096
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.6360.176
6148.0–6168.0+0.7970.216
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.1530.095
4640.0–4675.0+0.2980.084
4915.0–4930.0+0.7070.212
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.6620.243
4750.0–4770.0+0.3270.131
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.2380.144
4910.0–4955.0+0.2580.113
5075.0–5175.0−0.38340.103
6100.0–6200.0+0.1500.124
6760.0–6800.0+0.0070.212
7700.0–7800.0−0.2840.245
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.7740.021
4600.0–4800.0−0.8050.041
4800.0–5000.0−0.7750.030
5000.0–5200.0−0.7440.021
6100.0–6300.0−0.6960.046
6300.0–6500.0−0.6900.050
6500.0–6700.0−0.7140.062
6700.0–6800.0−0.6440.111
7400.0–7550.0−0.6850.062
8500.0–8700.0−0.6640.042
8700.0–8850.0−0.5070.078
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7670.074
4690.0–4710.0+0.3580.114
5150.0–5200.0+0.4060.046
8777.0–8832.0+0.3170.061
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.04350.141
6100.0–6128.0+0.5130.080
6430.0–6454.0+0.3600.118
6459.0–6478.0−0.4370.248
8480.0–8586.0+0.1680.025
8623.0–8697.0+0.1380.025
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.1230.146
4440.0–4474.0−0.2450.148
4650.0–4718.0+0.3280.094
4980.0–5045.0+0.3280.065
6584.0–6780.0+0.1770.096
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.6360.176
6148.0–6168.0+0.7970.216
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.1530.095
4640.0–4675.0+0.2980.084
4915.0–4930.0+0.7070.212
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.6620.243
4750.0–4770.0+0.3270.131
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.2380.144
4910.0–4955.0+0.2580.113
5075.0–5175.0−0.38340.103
6100.0–6200.0+0.1500.124
6760.0–6800.0+0.0070.212
7700.0–7800.0−0.2840.245
Table A16.

Chemical abundances K-029.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.7740.021
4600.0–4800.0−0.8050.041
4800.0–5000.0−0.7750.030
5000.0–5200.0−0.7440.021
6100.0–6300.0−0.6960.046
6300.0–6500.0−0.6900.050
6500.0–6700.0−0.7140.062
6700.0–6800.0−0.6440.111
7400.0–7550.0−0.6850.062
8500.0–8700.0−0.6640.042
8700.0–8850.0−0.5070.078
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7670.074
4690.0–4710.0+0.3580.114
5150.0–5200.0+0.4060.046
8777.0–8832.0+0.3170.061
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.04350.141
6100.0–6128.0+0.5130.080
6430.0–6454.0+0.3600.118
6459.0–6478.0−0.4370.248
8480.0–8586.0+0.1680.025
8623.0–8697.0+0.1380.025
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.1230.146
4440.0–4474.0−0.2450.148
4650.0–4718.0+0.3280.094
4980.0–5045.0+0.3280.065
6584.0–6780.0+0.1770.096
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.6360.176
6148.0–6168.0+0.7970.216
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.1530.095
4640.0–4675.0+0.2980.084
4915.0–4930.0+0.7070.212
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.6620.243
4750.0–4770.0+0.3270.131
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.2380.144
4910.0–4955.0+0.2580.113
5075.0–5175.0−0.38340.103
6100.0–6200.0+0.1500.124
6760.0–6800.0+0.0070.212
7700.0–7800.0−0.2840.245
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.7740.021
4600.0–4800.0−0.8050.041
4800.0–5000.0−0.7750.030
5000.0–5200.0−0.7440.021
6100.0–6300.0−0.6960.046
6300.0–6500.0−0.6900.050
6500.0–6700.0−0.7140.062
6700.0–6800.0−0.6440.111
7400.0–7550.0−0.6850.062
8500.0–8700.0−0.6640.042
8700.0–8850.0−0.5070.078
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7670.074
4690.0–4710.0+0.3580.114
5150.0–5200.0+0.4060.046
8777.0–8832.0+0.3170.061
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0−0.04350.141
6100.0–6128.0+0.5130.080
6430.0–6454.0+0.3600.118
6459.0–6478.0−0.4370.248
8480.0–8586.0+0.1680.025
8623.0–8697.0+0.1380.025
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.1230.146
4440.0–4474.0−0.2450.148
4650.0–4718.0+0.3280.094
4980.0–5045.0+0.3280.065
6584.0–6780.0+0.1770.096
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.6360.176
6148.0–6168.0+0.7970.216
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.1530.095
4640.0–4675.0+0.2980.084
4915.0–4930.0+0.7070.212
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.6620.243
4750.0–4770.0+0.3270.131
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.2380.144
4910.0–4955.0+0.2580.113
5075.0–5175.0−0.38340.103
6100.0–6200.0+0.1500.124
6760.0–6800.0+0.0070.212
7700.0–7800.0−0.2840.245
Table A17.

Chemical abundances K-034.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.5340.012
4600.0–4800.0−0.4850.030
4800.0–5000.0−0.5960.024
5000.0–5200.0−0.5340.012
6100.0–6300.0−0.6540.031
6300.0–6500.0−0.5940.035
6500.0–6700.0−0.4450.049
6700.0–6800.0−0.6040.081
7400.0–7550.0−0.5350.042
8500.0–8700.0−0.3250.021
8700.0–8850.0−0.3050.054
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7230.049
4690.0–4710.0+0.2130.087
5150.0–5200.0+0.3910.049
8777.0–8832.0+0.2630.044
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.0140.097
6100.0–6128.0+0.1640.077
6430.0–6454.0+0.4710.090
6459.0–6478.0+0.0640.152
8480.0–8586.0−0.0070.031
8623.0–8697.0−0.0270.032
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.1130.090
4440.0–4474.0+0.0450.092
4650.0–4718.0+0.1040.097
4980.0–5045.0+0.3040.052
6584.0–6780.0−0.0020.168
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.2930.144
6148.0–6168.0+0.4320.192
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0170.068
4640.0–4675.0+0.4030.060
4915.0–4930.0+0.6140.185
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.1440.135
4750.0–4770.0+0.1420.109
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.2330.124
4910.0–4955.0+0.4470.087
5075.0–5175.0−0.2270.085
6100.0–6200.0−0.0870.112
6760.0–6800.0+0.2670.154
7700.0–7800.0−0.1070.202
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.5340.012
4600.0–4800.0−0.4850.030
4800.0–5000.0−0.5960.024
5000.0–5200.0−0.5340.012
6100.0–6300.0−0.6540.031
6300.0–6500.0−0.5940.035
6500.0–6700.0−0.4450.049
6700.0–6800.0−0.6040.081
7400.0–7550.0−0.5350.042
8500.0–8700.0−0.3250.021
8700.0–8850.0−0.3050.054
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7230.049
4690.0–4710.0+0.2130.087
5150.0–5200.0+0.3910.049
8777.0–8832.0+0.2630.044
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.0140.097
6100.0–6128.0+0.1640.077
6430.0–6454.0+0.4710.090
6459.0–6478.0+0.0640.152
8480.0–8586.0−0.0070.031
8623.0–8697.0−0.0270.032
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.1130.090
4440.0–4474.0+0.0450.092
4650.0–4718.0+0.1040.097
4980.0–5045.0+0.3040.052
6584.0–6780.0−0.0020.168
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.2930.144
6148.0–6168.0+0.4320.192
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0170.068
4640.0–4675.0+0.4030.060
4915.0–4930.0+0.6140.185
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.1440.135
4750.0–4770.0+0.1420.109
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.2330.124
4910.0–4955.0+0.4470.087
5075.0–5175.0−0.2270.085
6100.0–6200.0−0.0870.112
6760.0–6800.0+0.2670.154
7700.0–7800.0−0.1070.202
Table A17.

Chemical abundances K-034.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.5340.012
4600.0–4800.0−0.4850.030
4800.0–5000.0−0.5960.024
5000.0–5200.0−0.5340.012
6100.0–6300.0−0.6540.031
6300.0–6500.0−0.5940.035
6500.0–6700.0−0.4450.049
6700.0–6800.0−0.6040.081
7400.0–7550.0−0.5350.042
8500.0–8700.0−0.3250.021
8700.0–8850.0−0.3050.054
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7230.049
4690.0–4710.0+0.2130.087
5150.0–5200.0+0.3910.049
8777.0–8832.0+0.2630.044
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.0140.097
6100.0–6128.0+0.1640.077
6430.0–6454.0+0.4710.090
6459.0–6478.0+0.0640.152
8480.0–8586.0−0.0070.031
8623.0–8697.0−0.0270.032
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.1130.090
4440.0–4474.0+0.0450.092
4650.0–4718.0+0.1040.097
4980.0–5045.0+0.3040.052
6584.0–6780.0−0.0020.168
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.2930.144
6148.0–6168.0+0.4320.192
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0170.068
4640.0–4675.0+0.4030.060
4915.0–4930.0+0.6140.185
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.1440.135
4750.0–4770.0+0.1420.109
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.2330.124
4910.0–4955.0+0.4470.087
5075.0–5175.0−0.2270.085
6100.0–6200.0−0.0870.112
6760.0–6800.0+0.2670.154
7700.0–7800.0−0.1070.202
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.5340.012
4600.0–4800.0−0.4850.030
4800.0–5000.0−0.5960.024
5000.0–5200.0−0.5340.012
6100.0–6300.0−0.6540.031
6300.0–6500.0−0.5940.035
6500.0–6700.0−0.4450.049
6700.0–6800.0−0.6040.081
7400.0–7550.0−0.5350.042
8500.0–8700.0−0.3250.021
8700.0–8850.0−0.3050.054
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.7230.049
4690.0–4710.0+0.2130.087
5150.0–5200.0+0.3910.049
8777.0–8832.0+0.2630.044
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.0140.097
6100.0–6128.0+0.1640.077
6430.0–6454.0+0.4710.090
6459.0–6478.0+0.0640.152
8480.0–8586.0−0.0070.031
8623.0–8697.0−0.0270.032
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.1130.090
4440.0–4474.0+0.0450.092
4650.0–4718.0+0.1040.097
4980.0–5045.0+0.3040.052
6584.0–6780.0−0.0020.168
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0+0.2930.144
6148.0–6168.0+0.4320.192
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0170.068
4640.0–4675.0+0.4030.060
4915.0–4930.0+0.6140.185
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0+0.1440.135
4750.0–4770.0+0.1420.109
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0+0.2330.124
4910.0–4955.0+0.4470.087
5075.0–5175.0−0.2270.085
6100.0–6200.0−0.0870.112
6760.0–6800.0+0.2670.154
7700.0–7800.0−0.1070.202
Table A18.

Chemical abundances K-163.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.1150.012
4600.0–4800.0−1.0490.036
4800.0–5000.0−1.1450.021
5000.0–5200.0−1.0950.021
6100.0–6300.0−1.0600.046
6300.0–6500.0−1.0260.043
6500.0–6700.0−0.8050.057
6700.0–6800.0−1.1150.157
7400.0–7550.0−1.1960.210
8500.0–8700.0−1.1360.064
8700.0–8850.0−0.8760.079
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.8670.051
4690.0–4710.0+0.2890.128
5150.0–5200.0+0.4480.048
8777.0–8832.0+0.5270.057
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.1570.101
6100.0–6128.0+0.5270.089
6430.0–6454.0+0.7530.101
6459.0–6478.0+0.4400.158
8480.0–8586.0+0.4580.037
8623.0–8697.0+0.4010.037
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.0770.107
4440.0–4474.0+0.1460.101
4650.0–4718.0+0.3380.079
4980.0–5045.0+0.3280.060
6584.0–6780.0+0.2540.096
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0+0.6480.219
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0830.089
4640.0–4675.0+0.0970.107
4915.0–4930.0+0.5470.253
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.4530.184
4750.0–4770.0−0.1130.116
[Ni/Fe]4700.0—4720.0+0.1260.164
4910.0–4955.0+0.1460.120
5075.0–5175.0−0.2230.079
6100.0–6200.0+0.4380.111
6760.0–6800.0+0.3870.191
7700.0–7800.0+0.6370.179
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.1150.012
4600.0–4800.0−1.0490.036
4800.0–5000.0−1.1450.021
5000.0–5200.0−1.0950.021
6100.0–6300.0−1.0600.046
6300.0–6500.0−1.0260.043
6500.0–6700.0−0.8050.057
6700.0–6800.0−1.1150.157
7400.0–7550.0−1.1960.210
8500.0–8700.0−1.1360.064
8700.0–8850.0−0.8760.079
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.8670.051
4690.0–4710.0+0.2890.128
5150.0–5200.0+0.4480.048
8777.0–8832.0+0.5270.057
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.1570.101
6100.0–6128.0+0.5270.089
6430.0–6454.0+0.7530.101
6459.0–6478.0+0.4400.158
8480.0–8586.0+0.4580.037
8623.0–8697.0+0.4010.037
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.0770.107
4440.0–4474.0+0.1460.101
4650.0–4718.0+0.3380.079
4980.0–5045.0+0.3280.060
6584.0–6780.0+0.2540.096
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0+0.6480.219
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0830.089
4640.0–4675.0+0.0970.107
4915.0–4930.0+0.5470.253
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.4530.184
4750.0–4770.0−0.1130.116
[Ni/Fe]4700.0—4720.0+0.1260.164
4910.0–4955.0+0.1460.120
5075.0–5175.0−0.2230.079
6100.0–6200.0+0.4380.111
6760.0–6800.0+0.3870.191
7700.0–7800.0+0.6370.179
Table A18.

Chemical abundances K-163.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.1150.012
4600.0–4800.0−1.0490.036
4800.0–5000.0−1.1450.021
5000.0–5200.0−1.0950.021
6100.0–6300.0−1.0600.046
6300.0–6500.0−1.0260.043
6500.0–6700.0−0.8050.057
6700.0–6800.0−1.1150.157
7400.0–7550.0−1.1960.210
8500.0–8700.0−1.1360.064
8700.0–8850.0−0.8760.079
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.8670.051
4690.0–4710.0+0.2890.128
5150.0–5200.0+0.4480.048
8777.0–8832.0+0.5270.057
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.1570.101
6100.0–6128.0+0.5270.089
6430.0–6454.0+0.7530.101
6459.0–6478.0+0.4400.158
8480.0–8586.0+0.4580.037
8623.0–8697.0+0.4010.037
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.0770.107
4440.0–4474.0+0.1460.101
4650.0–4718.0+0.3380.079
4980.0–5045.0+0.3280.060
6584.0–6780.0+0.2540.096
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0+0.6480.219
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0830.089
4640.0–4675.0+0.0970.107
4915.0–4930.0+0.5470.253
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.4530.184
4750.0–4770.0−0.1130.116
[Ni/Fe]4700.0—4720.0+0.1260.164
4910.0–4955.0+0.1460.120
5075.0–5175.0−0.2230.079
6100.0–6200.0+0.4380.111
6760.0–6800.0+0.3870.191
7700.0–7800.0+0.6370.179
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.1150.012
4600.0–4800.0−1.0490.036
4800.0–5000.0−1.1450.021
5000.0–5200.0−1.0950.021
6100.0–6300.0−1.0600.046
6300.0–6500.0−1.0260.043
6500.0–6700.0−0.8050.057
6700.0–6800.0−1.1150.157
7400.0–7550.0−1.1960.210
8500.0–8700.0−1.1360.064
8700.0–8850.0−0.8760.079
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.8670.051
4690.0–4710.0+0.2890.128
5150.0–5200.0+0.4480.048
8777.0–8832.0+0.5270.057
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.1570.101
6100.0–6128.0+0.5270.089
6430.0–6454.0+0.7530.101
6459.0–6478.0+0.4400.158
8480.0–8586.0+0.4580.037
8623.0–8697.0+0.4010.037
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.0770.107
4440.0–4474.0+0.1460.101
4650.0–4718.0+0.3380.079
4980.0–5045.0+0.3280.060
6584.0–6780.0+0.2540.096
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0+0.6480.219
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.0830.089
4640.0–4675.0+0.0970.107
4915.0–4930.0+0.5470.253
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.4530.184
4750.0–4770.0−0.1130.116
[Ni/Fe]4700.0—4720.0+0.1260.164
4910.0–4955.0+0.1460.120
5075.0–5175.0−0.2230.079
6100.0–6200.0+0.4380.111
6760.0–6800.0+0.3870.191
7700.0–7800.0+0.6370.179
Table A19.

Chemical abundances VHH81-03.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.2340.012
4600.0–4800.0−0.1350.021
4800.0–5000.0−0.1660.021
5000.0–5200.0−0.1650.021
6100.0–6300.0−0.1750.035
6300.0–6500.0−0.2050.040
6500.0–6700.0−0.3440.071
6700.0–6800.0−0.0940.062
7400.0–7550.0−0.2630.042
8500.0–8700.0+0.0050.011
8700.0–8850.0−0.0450.053
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3430.075
4690.0–4710.0+0.1880.085
5150.0–5200.0+0.3920.058
8777.0–8832.0+0.1060.051
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2030.091
6100.0–6128.0+0.3590.079
6430.0–6454.0+0.4100.098
6459.0–6478.0−0.5050.207
8480.0–8586.0−0.1560.045
8623.0–8697.0−0.2170.044
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.0370.091
4440.0–4474.0+0.0640.093
4650.0–4718.0+0.1030.075
4980.0–5045.0+0.2130.059
6584.0–6780.0−0.3090.167
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.1260.075
4640.0–4675.0+0.2860.076
4915.0–4930.0+0.8740.157
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1820.144
4750.0–4770.0+0.3930.104
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.2770.156
4910.0–4955.0+0.0750.100
5075.0–5175.0+0.1320.081
6100.0–6200.0+0.0330.110
6760.0–6800.0+0.2320.175
7700.0–7800.0+0.3980.161
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.2340.012
4600.0–4800.0−0.1350.021
4800.0–5000.0−0.1660.021
5000.0–5200.0−0.1650.021
6100.0–6300.0−0.1750.035
6300.0–6500.0−0.2050.040
6500.0–6700.0−0.3440.071
6700.0–6800.0−0.0940.062
7400.0–7550.0−0.2630.042
8500.0–8700.0+0.0050.011
8700.0–8850.0−0.0450.053
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3430.075
4690.0–4710.0+0.1880.085
5150.0–5200.0+0.3920.058
8777.0–8832.0+0.1060.051
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2030.091
6100.0–6128.0+0.3590.079
6430.0–6454.0+0.4100.098
6459.0–6478.0−0.5050.207
8480.0–8586.0−0.1560.045
8623.0–8697.0−0.2170.044
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.0370.091
4440.0–4474.0+0.0640.093
4650.0–4718.0+0.1030.075
4980.0–5045.0+0.2130.059
6584.0–6780.0−0.3090.167
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.1260.075
4640.0–4675.0+0.2860.076
4915.0–4930.0+0.8740.157
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1820.144
4750.0–4770.0+0.3930.104
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.2770.156
4910.0–4955.0+0.0750.100
5075.0–5175.0+0.1320.081
6100.0–6200.0+0.0330.110
6760.0–6800.0+0.2320.175
7700.0–7800.0+0.3980.161
Table A19.

Chemical abundances VHH81-03.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.2340.012
4600.0–4800.0−0.1350.021
4800.0–5000.0−0.1660.021
5000.0–5200.0−0.1650.021
6100.0–6300.0−0.1750.035
6300.0–6500.0−0.2050.040
6500.0–6700.0−0.3440.071
6700.0–6800.0−0.0940.062
7400.0–7550.0−0.2630.042
8500.0–8700.0+0.0050.011
8700.0–8850.0−0.0450.053
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3430.075
4690.0–4710.0+0.1880.085
5150.0–5200.0+0.3920.058
8777.0–8832.0+0.1060.051
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2030.091
6100.0–6128.0+0.3590.079
6430.0–6454.0+0.4100.098
6459.0–6478.0−0.5050.207
8480.0–8586.0−0.1560.045
8623.0–8697.0−0.2170.044
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.0370.091
4440.0–4474.0+0.0640.093
4650.0–4718.0+0.1030.075
4980.0–5045.0+0.2130.059
6584.0–6780.0−0.3090.167
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.1260.075
4640.0–4675.0+0.2860.076
4915.0–4930.0+0.8740.157
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1820.144
4750.0–4770.0+0.3930.104
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.2770.156
4910.0–4955.0+0.0750.100
5075.0–5175.0+0.1320.081
6100.0–6200.0+0.0330.110
6760.0–6800.0+0.2320.175
7700.0–7800.0+0.3980.161
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−0.2340.012
4600.0–4800.0−0.1350.021
4800.0–5000.0−0.1660.021
5000.0–5200.0−0.1650.021
6100.0–6300.0−0.1750.035
6300.0–6500.0−0.2050.040
6500.0–6700.0−0.3440.071
6700.0–6800.0−0.0940.062
7400.0–7550.0−0.2630.042
8500.0–8700.0+0.0050.011
8700.0–8850.0−0.0450.053
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3430.075
4690.0–4710.0+0.1880.085
5150.0–5200.0+0.3920.058
8777.0–8832.0+0.1060.051
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2030.091
6100.0–6128.0+0.3590.079
6430.0–6454.0+0.4100.098
6459.0–6478.0−0.5050.207
8480.0–8586.0−0.1560.045
8623.0–8697.0−0.2170.044
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0−0.0370.091
4440.0–4474.0+0.0640.093
4650.0–4718.0+0.1030.075
4980.0–5045.0+0.2130.059
6584.0–6780.0−0.3090.167
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.1260.075
4640.0–4675.0+0.2860.076
4915.0–4930.0+0.8740.157
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1820.144
4750.0–4770.0+0.3930.104
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.2770.156
4910.0–4955.0+0.0750.100
5075.0–5175.0+0.1320.081
6100.0–6200.0+0.0330.110
6760.0–6800.0+0.2320.175
7700.0–7800.0+0.3980.161
Table A20.

Chemical abundances VHH81-05.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.6430.053
4600.0–4800.0−1.6830.072
4800.0–5000.0−1.5640.042
5000.0–5200.0−1.4650.051
6100.0–6300.0−1.4030.083
6300.0–6500.0−1.6230.092
6500.0–6700.0−2.0740.111
6700.0–6800.0−1.6530.313
7400.0–7550.0−1.4130.123
8500.0–8700.0−1.9440.071
8700.0–8850.0−1.4230.163
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3960.110
4690.0–4710.0+0.1560.278
5150.0–5200.0+0.2460.079
8777.0–8832.0−0.0740.162
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2270.211
6100.0–6128.0+0.4870.182
6430.0–6454.0+0.2660.239
6459.0–6478.0
8480.0–8586.0+0.5460.061
8623.0–8697.0+0.5260.063
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.3560.162
4440.0–4474.0+0.4560.154
4650.0–4718.0+0.2770.163
4980.0–5045.0+0.5070.110
6584.0–6780.0+1.1760.154
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.1340.219
4640.0–4675.0−0.0530.299
4915.0–4930.0
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1630.397
4750.0–4770.0−0.1940.229
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.7530.725
4910.0–4955.0−0.4540.982
5075.0–5175.0−0.4650.219
6100.0–6200.0
6760.0–6800.0−0.1440.346
7700.0–7800.0−0.4640.804
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.6430.053
4600.0–4800.0−1.6830.072
4800.0–5000.0−1.5640.042
5000.0–5200.0−1.4650.051
6100.0–6300.0−1.4030.083
6300.0–6500.0−1.6230.092
6500.0–6700.0−2.0740.111
6700.0–6800.0−1.6530.313
7400.0–7550.0−1.4130.123
8500.0–8700.0−1.9440.071
8700.0–8850.0−1.4230.163
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3960.110
4690.0–4710.0+0.1560.278
5150.0–5200.0+0.2460.079
8777.0–8832.0−0.0740.162
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2270.211
6100.0–6128.0+0.4870.182
6430.0–6454.0+0.2660.239
6459.0–6478.0
8480.0–8586.0+0.5460.061
8623.0–8697.0+0.5260.063
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.3560.162
4440.0–4474.0+0.4560.154
4650.0–4718.0+0.2770.163
4980.0–5045.0+0.5070.110
6584.0–6780.0+1.1760.154
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.1340.219
4640.0–4675.0−0.0530.299
4915.0–4930.0
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1630.397
4750.0–4770.0−0.1940.229
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.7530.725
4910.0–4955.0−0.4540.982
5075.0–5175.0−0.4650.219
6100.0–6200.0
6760.0–6800.0−0.1440.346
7700.0–7800.0−0.4640.804
Table A20.

Chemical abundances VHH81-05.

ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.6430.053
4600.0–4800.0−1.6830.072
4800.0–5000.0−1.5640.042
5000.0–5200.0−1.4650.051
6100.0–6300.0−1.4030.083
6300.0–6500.0−1.6230.092
6500.0–6700.0−2.0740.111
6700.0–6800.0−1.6530.313
7400.0–7550.0−1.4130.123
8500.0–8700.0−1.9440.071
8700.0–8850.0−1.4230.163
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3960.110
4690.0–4710.0+0.1560.278
5150.0–5200.0+0.2460.079
8777.0–8832.0−0.0740.162
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2270.211
6100.0–6128.0+0.4870.182
6430.0–6454.0+0.2660.239
6459.0–6478.0
8480.0–8586.0+0.5460.061
8623.0–8697.0+0.5260.063
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.3560.162
4440.0–4474.0+0.4560.154
4650.0–4718.0+0.2770.163
4980.0–5045.0+0.5070.110
6584.0–6780.0+1.1760.154
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.1340.219
4640.0–4675.0−0.0530.299
4915.0–4930.0
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1630.397
4750.0–4770.0−0.1940.229
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.7530.725
4910.0–4955.0−0.4540.982
5075.0–5175.0−0.4650.219
6100.0–6200.0
6760.0–6800.0−0.1440.346
7700.0–7800.0−0.4640.804
ElementWavelength (Å)AbundanceError
[Fe/H]4400.0–4600.0−1.6430.053
4600.0–4800.0−1.6830.072
4800.0–5000.0−1.5640.042
5000.0–5200.0−1.4650.051
6100.0–6300.0−1.4030.083
6300.0–6500.0−1.6230.092
6500.0–6700.0−2.0740.111
6700.0–6800.0−1.6530.313
7400.0–7550.0−1.4130.123
8500.0–8700.0−1.9440.071
8700.0–8850.0−1.4230.163
[Mg/Fe]4300.0–4370.0+0.3960.110
4690.0–4710.0+0.1560.278
5150.0–5200.0+0.2460.079
8777.0–8832.0−0.0740.162
[Ca/Fe]4445.0–4465.0+0.2270.211
6100.0–6128.0+0.4870.182
6430.0–6454.0+0.2660.239
6459.0–6478.0
8480.0–8586.0+0.5460.061
8623.0–8697.0+0.5260.063
[Ti/Fe]4270.0–4322.0+0.3560.162
4440.0–4474.0+0.4560.154
4650.0–4718.0+0.2770.163
4980.0–5045.0+0.5070.110
6584.0–6780.0+1.1760.154
[Na/Fe]5670.0–5700.0
6148.0–6168.0
[Cr/Fe]4580.0–4640.0−0.1340.219
4640.0–4675.0−0.0530.299
4915.0–4930.0
[Mn/Fe]4450.0–4515.0−0.1630.397
4750.0–4770.0−0.1940.229
[Ni/Fe]4700.0–4720.0−0.7530.725
4910.0–4955.0−0.4540.982
5075.0–5175.0−0.4650.219
6100.0–6200.0
6760.0–6800.0−0.1440.346
7700.0–7800.0−0.4640.804