-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
S. Muzahid, R. Srianand, J. Charlton, M. Eracleous, On the covering fraction variability in an EUV mini-BAL outflow from PG 1206+459, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 457, Issue 3, 11 April 2016, Pages 2665–2674, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw132
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
We report on the first detection of extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) absorption variability in the Ne viii λλ770, 780 mini-broad absorption line (mini-BAL) in the spectrum of the quasar (QSO) PG 1206+459. The observed equivalent width (EW) of the Ne viii doublet shows a ∼4σ variation over a time-scale of 2.8 months in the QSO's rest frame. Both members of the Ne viii doublet exhibit non-black saturation, indicating partial coverage of the continuum source. An increase in the Ne viii covering fraction from fc = 0.59 ± 0.05 to 0.72 ± 0.03 is observed over the same period. The Ne viii profiles are too highly saturated to be susceptible to changes in the ionization state of the absorbing gas. In fact, we do not observe any significant variation in the EW and/or column density after correcting the spectra for partial coverage. We, thus, propose transverse motions of the absorbing gas as the cause of the observed variability. Using a simple model of a transiting cloud we estimate a transverse speed of ∼1800 km s−1. For Keplerian motion, this corresponds to a distance between the absorber and the central engine of ∼1.3 pc, which places the absorber just outside the broad-line region. We further estimate a density of ∼5 × 106 cm−3 and a kinetic luminosity of ∼1043–1044 erg s−1. Such large kinetic powers suggest that outflows detected via EUV lines are potentially major contributors to active galactic nuclei feedback.
1 INTRODUCTION
Broad absorption line (BAL, line spread, Δv ∼ few × 1000 km s−1) and mini-BAL (Δv ∼ few × 100 km s−1) systems detected via UV absorption troughs blueshifted with respect to the QSO's emission redshift are thought to originate in an equatorial wind that is launched from the accretion disc near the central supermassive black hole (SMBH; e.g. Arav et al. 1995; Murray et al. 1995; Proga, Stone & Kallman 2000). The mass, momentum, and energy carried by such winds are increasingly invoked as the primary feedback mechanisms to explain the evolution of SMBH (Silk & Rees 1998; King 2003, 2005) and their host galaxies (Begelman & Nath 2005; Di Matteo, Springel & Hernquist 2005). For example, it has been shown that an outflow with a kinetic power of a few per cent of the Eddington luminosity provides sufficient feedback to quench star formation, thus coupling the evolution of the host galaxy and the growth of the central SMBH (Di Matteo et al. 2005). QSO outflows can also be responsible for metal enrichment in the interstellar medium, in the circumgalactic medium, and even in the intergalactic medium (Wiersma, Schaye & Theuns 2011). Therefore, the study of QSO outflows via BAL and mini-BAL systems is immensely important. In particular, the incidence rate, outflow velocity, variability time-scale, and covering fraction (fc) of the absorption troughs provide essential clues about the location, geometry, and energetics of the flow.
It is now well known that BAL systems show variability in absorption profiles over a time period of 1–10 yr in the QSO rest frame (e.g. Barlow 1994; Srianand & Petitjean 2001; Lundgren et al. 2007; Gibson et al. 2008; Capellupo et al. 2011; Vivek et al. 2012, 2014; Filiz Ak et al. 2013, and references therein). Filiz Ak et al. (2013) found a BAL fraction of ∼50–60 per cent that exhibit variability over time-scales of 1–4 yr in the QSO's rest frame. Additionally, BAL variability is found to be larger for longer time-scales (e.g. Gibson et al. 2008; Capellupo et al. 2011; Vivek et al. 2014). For example, Capellupo et al. (2011) have found variability in ∼40 per cent of BAL absorbers on time-scales of <1 yr with that fraction increasing to ∼65 per cent on time-scales of 4–8 yr in the QSO rest frame. BAL variability is generally explained by: (1) change in fc due to motions of the absorber across the line of sight, and/or (2) change in the ionization state of the gas. In either case, it is possible to determine the dynamics and location of the absorber with respect to the central engine under some assumptions. Note that the above explanations hold for mini-BAL variability as well.
While BAL variability is well studied via several ongoing monitoring campaigns by different groups with a fairly large number of objects, very little is known for mini-BALs. In fact, variability in mini-BAL absorption is studied only in a handful of cases (i.e. Hamann, Barlow & Junkkarinen 1997; Narayanan et al. 2004; Misawa et al. 2007; Rodríguez Hidalgo, Hamann & Hall 2011; Misawa, Charlton & Eracleous 2014). Interestingly, Misawa et al. (2007) have demonstrated that the aforementioned causes for line variability cannot reproduce the rapid, simultaneous variation in multiple troughs of the mini-BAL system detected towards HS 1603+3820. Instead, they proposed that a clumpy ‘screen’ of gas with variable optical depth and covering fraction, located between the continuum source and the absorbing gas, mimics the variation in the ionizing continuum. The variability study of a sample of seven mini-BALs was recently presented by Misawa et al. (2014). Assuming that the observed variations result from changes in the ionization state of the mini-BAL gas, they have inferred lower limits to the gas density of ∼103–105 cm−3, corresponding to upper limits on the distance of the absorbers from the central engine of ∼ few kpc. Note that unlike BAL systems, absorption line parameters can be more robustly determined for mini-BAL systems because (1) the QSO continuum is easily identifiable even in the presence of mini-BALs, (2) doublets are not self-blended due to relatively narrow line profiles, and (c) the kinematic structure is often discernible due to lack of heavy line-saturation (see e.g. Muzahid et al. 2012). Mini-BAL systems are thus excellent tools for measuring outflow properties, e.g. density, metallicity, outflow mass, mass-flow rate, and kinetic luminosity that are essential for quantifying the so called active galactic nuclei (AGN) feedback (Arav et al. 2013).
Recently, in an archival Hubble Space Telescope (HST)/ Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS) study, we have reported a new population of associated absorbers detected via absorption from extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) ions (e.g. Ne viii, Na ix, and Mg x) in the spectra of intermediate-z QSOs (Muzahid et al. 2013, hereafter M13). We have found that a significant fraction (∼40 per cent) of the intermediate-z QSOs exhibit outflows observable via EUV lines. These absorbers are very highly ionized with ionization parameters (i.e. 0.5≲ log U ≲1.0) consistent with their being intermediate to X-ray ‘warm absorbers’ (Halpern 1984) and BALs. The velocity spreads (100–800 km s−1) of the Ne viii absorption lines suggest that they are mini-BALs. Here we present a fortuitous case from the sample presented in M13 in which the QSO (PG 1206+459) was observed at three different epochs. PG 1206+459 is an UV-bright QSO with a V-band magnitude of ∼15.4 and has an emission redshift of zem = 1.163. The multi-epoch spectroscopic observations of the QSO allowed us to study variability of the O iv, N iv, and Ne viii absorption. We found a ∼4σ variation in the Ne viii equivalent width (EW). This is the first case of EUV mini-BAL variability reported so far. This article is organized as follows: in Section 2, we present observations and data reduction of the QSO PG 1206+459. Absorption line analysis and the QSO's properties are presented in Section 3. In Section 4, we discuss the implications of our findings. In Section 5, we briefly summarized our main results. Throughout this article, we adopt a flat Λcold dark matter cosmology with ΩΛ = 0.73, ΩM = 0.27, and H0 = 71 km s−1Mpc−1. Unless specified otherwise, the equivalent widths (EWs) are given in the observed frame whereas the time-scales are in the QSO's rest frame.
2 OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION
Far-UV (FUV) spectra of the UV-bright QSO PG 1206+459 (zem = 1.163) were obtained using HST/COS Cycle-17 observations, under programme ID: GO-11741 (PI: Todd Tripp). These observations consist of G130M and G160M grating integrations at a medium spectral resolution of R ∼20 000 (full width at half-maximum ∼18 km s−1). The data were retrieved from the HST archive and reduced using the STScI calcos v2.21 pipeline software. The reduced data were flux calibrated. To increase the spectral signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), spectra from individual exposures were aligned and co-added using the idl code ‘coadd_x1d’ developed by Danforth, Stocke & Shull (2010). The properties of COS and its in-flight operations are discussed by Osterman et al. (2011) and Green et al. (2012). The co-added spectra are significantly oversampled, with six raw pixels per resolution element. We thus binned the data by six pixels. This improves the spectral S/N per pixel by a factor of |$\sqrt{6}$|. All our measurements and analyses were performed on the binned data. The binning does not affect our EW and/or fc measurements since the absorption lines of interest are much broader than the spectral resolution. Continuum normalization was done by fitting the line-free regions with smooth low-order polynomials. Since there is no Ly α forest crowding at low z and the absorption lines of interest do not fall on top of any emission lines, the continua were very well defined in most part. COS wavelength calibration is known to have uncertainties at the level of 10–15 km s−1 (Savage et al. 2011; Meiring et al. 2013). Using molecular hydrogen absorption lines, Muzahid, Srianand & Charlton (2015a) have noted that while in majority of the cases wavelengths are accurate within ∼±5 km s−1, large offsets (>10 km s−1) are often noticeable at the edges of the COS spectra. We noticed that the wavelength calibration uncertainty is usually <5 km s−1 for PG 1206+459. However, the uncertainty increases to ∼10 km s−1 at the edge of the spectra as also noted by Muzahid et al. (2015a).
Besides COS, we have used the HST/Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) spectrum of PG 1206+459. The STIS spectrum was obtained using the E230M grating under programme ID: 8672 (PI: Chris Churchill). We refer the reader to Ding et al. (2003) for the full details on the STIS observations. The spectrum is only used for calculating rest frame 1350 Å flux.
In Table 1, we summarize the details of the observations. It is clear from the table that the G160M observations were taken in three different epochs. Epoch-1 and Epoch-2 are separated by ∼7 d, corresponding to ∼3.2 d in the QSO's rest frame. Epoch-1 and Epoch-3 are separated by ∼6 months (∼2.8 months in the QSO's rest frame). We note that the G160M spectrum covers only the N iv λ765, O iv λ 787, and Ne viii λλ770, 780 transitions from the mini-BAL outflow we studied here. Unfortunately, other important high-ionization species (e.g. Na ixλλ681, 694, Mg xλλ609, 624) fall in the wavelength range covered by the G130M grating and are observed only once.
Gratinga . | |$\lambda _{\rm cen}^{b}$| . | Tiltc . | |$t_{\rm exp}^{d}$| . | Date of . | MJDe . | Epoch . | S/Nf . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (Å) . | . | (s) . | observation . | . | . | . |
G160M | 1600 | 1 | 2361.2 | 2009-12-29 | 55194.5 | 1 | |
G160M | 1600 | 2 | 3137.2 | 2009-12-29 | 55194.5 | 1 | |
G160M | 1623 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2009-12-29 | 55194.5 | 1 | |
G160M | 1623 | 4 | 3137.2 | 2009-12-29 | 55194.5 | 1 | 11 |
G160M | 1600 | 1 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | |
G160M | 1600 | 2 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | |
G160M | 1600 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | |
G160M1 | 1600 | 4 | 3137.0 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | 10 |
G160M | 1623 | 1 | 2361.2 | 2010-06-14 | 55361.5 | 3 | |
G160M | 1623 | 2 | 3137.1 | 2010-06-14 | 55361.5 | 3 | |
G160M | 1623 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2010-06-14 | 55361.5 | 3 | |
G160M | 1623 | 4 | 3137.2 | 2010-06-14 | 55361.5 | 3 | 12 |
G130M | 1309 | 1 | 2406.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1309 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1309 | 4 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1327 | 1 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1327 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1327 | 4 | 2406.2 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | 27 |
Gratinga . | |$\lambda _{\rm cen}^{b}$| . | Tiltc . | |$t_{\rm exp}^{d}$| . | Date of . | MJDe . | Epoch . | S/Nf . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (Å) . | . | (s) . | observation . | . | . | . |
G160M | 1600 | 1 | 2361.2 | 2009-12-29 | 55194.5 | 1 | |
G160M | 1600 | 2 | 3137.2 | 2009-12-29 | 55194.5 | 1 | |
G160M | 1623 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2009-12-29 | 55194.5 | 1 | |
G160M | 1623 | 4 | 3137.2 | 2009-12-29 | 55194.5 | 1 | 11 |
G160M | 1600 | 1 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | |
G160M | 1600 | 2 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | |
G160M | 1600 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | |
G160M1 | 1600 | 4 | 3137.0 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | 10 |
G160M | 1623 | 1 | 2361.2 | 2010-06-14 | 55361.5 | 3 | |
G160M | 1623 | 2 | 3137.1 | 2010-06-14 | 55361.5 | 3 | |
G160M | 1623 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2010-06-14 | 55361.5 | 3 | |
G160M | 1623 | 4 | 3137.2 | 2010-06-14 | 55361.5 | 3 | 12 |
G130M | 1309 | 1 | 2406.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1309 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1309 | 4 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1327 | 1 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1327 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1327 | 4 | 2406.2 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | 27 |
Notes. aGrating used. bCentral wavelength. cFixed-pattern offset position. dExposure time in second. eModified Julian date corresponding to the observation date. fS/N per resolution element of the co-added data at ∼1575 Å for G160M grating and at ∼1230 Å for G130M grating. 1This exposure (lb1o05kqq) was bad and not used for co-addition.
Gratinga . | |$\lambda _{\rm cen}^{b}$| . | Tiltc . | |$t_{\rm exp}^{d}$| . | Date of . | MJDe . | Epoch . | S/Nf . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (Å) . | . | (s) . | observation . | . | . | . |
G160M | 1600 | 1 | 2361.2 | 2009-12-29 | 55194.5 | 1 | |
G160M | 1600 | 2 | 3137.2 | 2009-12-29 | 55194.5 | 1 | |
G160M | 1623 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2009-12-29 | 55194.5 | 1 | |
G160M | 1623 | 4 | 3137.2 | 2009-12-29 | 55194.5 | 1 | 11 |
G160M | 1600 | 1 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | |
G160M | 1600 | 2 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | |
G160M | 1600 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | |
G160M1 | 1600 | 4 | 3137.0 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | 10 |
G160M | 1623 | 1 | 2361.2 | 2010-06-14 | 55361.5 | 3 | |
G160M | 1623 | 2 | 3137.1 | 2010-06-14 | 55361.5 | 3 | |
G160M | 1623 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2010-06-14 | 55361.5 | 3 | |
G160M | 1623 | 4 | 3137.2 | 2010-06-14 | 55361.5 | 3 | 12 |
G130M | 1309 | 1 | 2406.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1309 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1309 | 4 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1327 | 1 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1327 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1327 | 4 | 2406.2 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | 27 |
Gratinga . | |$\lambda _{\rm cen}^{b}$| . | Tiltc . | |$t_{\rm exp}^{d}$| . | Date of . | MJDe . | Epoch . | S/Nf . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (Å) . | . | (s) . | observation . | . | . | . |
G160M | 1600 | 1 | 2361.2 | 2009-12-29 | 55194.5 | 1 | |
G160M | 1600 | 2 | 3137.2 | 2009-12-29 | 55194.5 | 1 | |
G160M | 1623 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2009-12-29 | 55194.5 | 1 | |
G160M | 1623 | 4 | 3137.2 | 2009-12-29 | 55194.5 | 1 | 11 |
G160M | 1600 | 1 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | |
G160M | 1600 | 2 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | |
G160M | 1600 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | |
G160M1 | 1600 | 4 | 3137.0 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | 10 |
G160M | 1623 | 1 | 2361.2 | 2010-06-14 | 55361.5 | 3 | |
G160M | 1623 | 2 | 3137.1 | 2010-06-14 | 55361.5 | 3 | |
G160M | 1623 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2010-06-14 | 55361.5 | 3 | |
G160M | 1623 | 4 | 3137.2 | 2010-06-14 | 55361.5 | 3 | 12 |
G130M | 1309 | 1 | 2406.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1309 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1309 | 4 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1327 | 1 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1327 | 3 | 3137.2 | 2010-01-04 | 55200.5 | 2 | |
G130M | 1327 | 4 | 2406.2 | 2010-01-05 | 55201.5 | 2 | 27 |
Notes. aGrating used. bCentral wavelength. cFixed-pattern offset position. dExposure time in second. eModified Julian date corresponding to the observation date. fS/N per resolution element of the co-added data at ∼1575 Å for G160M grating and at ∼1230 Å for G130M grating. 1This exposure (lb1o05kqq) was bad and not used for co-addition.
3 ANALYSIS
3.1 Properties of the absorber
The mini-BAL outflow from QSO PG 1206+459 (zem = 1.163) was first reported in M13 as a part of our HST/COS survey of intrinsic absorbers detected via Ne viii λλ770, 780 doublet transitions. The absorption redshift of zabs = 1.028 54 corresponds to an outflow velocity of ∼19 200 km s−1. Both members of the Ne viii doublet are detected with EW/σEW > 20. The Ne viii absorption is spread over Δv ∼360 km s−1 with a total column density of |$N({\rm Ne\,{\small VIII}})>10^{16}$| cm−2. A very weak Ly α line is detected with |$\log (N({\rm H\,{\small I}})/{\rm cm^{-2}})\lesssim$|14 in the HST/STIS spectrum. Interestingly, no singly or doubly ionized species are detected from this absorber. Besides Ne viii, we have reported the presence of several other high-(Ar viii, Na ix, Mg x) and low-(O iv, N iv, O v, N v) ionization species (see fig. 7 of M13). But only N ivλ765, Ne viii λ770, 780, and O iv λ787 lines have multi-epoch coverage.

Normalized flux against the outflow velocity, measured with respect to the zem = 1.163 for different ions. The absorption from the outflow are shown by the shaded regions. All other absorption are unrelated and intervening. The blended pixels are marked by the horizontal red bars. In each panel the data with different colours represent different epochs as indicated in the top. No significant variation is seen in the left-hand panel between Epoch-1 and Epoch-2 for any of the troughs. We therefore co-add the Epoch-1 and Epoch-2 data to obtain a better S/N spectrum which is represented by Epoch-1′ in the right-hand panel. While no appreciable variation is seen between Epoch-1′ and Epoch-3 in the N iv and O iv absorption, the Ne viii doublet shows a significant change in the absorption troughs. Note that only one central wavelength setting was used for the G160M grating observations in Epoch-2 and the O iv line falls in the gap of the Epoch-2 spectrum.
Next, we choose a set of 39 strong absorption lines that are detected with EW/σEW > 5 in all three epochs in the wavelength ranges 1440–1587 Å and 1623–1775 Å.1 Details of these lines are given in Appendix A. Note that all but three of these lines, i.e. NIV λ765, Ne viii λ770 and λ780 lines from the mini-BAL,2 are intervening and should not show any considerable variation with time. For all these absorption lines we have calculated Sij. The top panel of Fig. 2 shows the distribution of Sij as measured between Epoch-1 and Epoch-2 (S12). It is apparent from the figure that none of the absorption lines, including the three from the mini-BAL system, shows variability with a significance of >2σ. A Gaussian fit to the S12 distribution gives a mean of μ = −0.3 ± 0.2 and a standard deviation of σ = 1.0 ± 0.2. A 2σ variation, thus, is not significant for the data we have. Since there is no considerable variation in any absorption we co-add the Epoch-1 and Epoch-2 data in order to increase the spectral S/N. The resultant data, with marginally improved S/N of ∼14 per resolution element, are shown as Epoch-1′ in Fig. 1. The Epoch-1′ spectrum has spectral coverage of 1150–1800 Å. For interested readers, we have shown the Epoch-1′ spectrum in Appendix B.

The Sij distributions between Epoch-1 & Epoch-2 (S12, top) and between Epoch-1′ & Epoch-3 (|$S_{1^\prime 3}$|, bottom) for a set of 39 strong absorption lines detected in all three epochs (see the text). The details of these absorption lines are summarized in Appendix A. Each of the observed Sij distributions is modelled as Gaussian with fit parameters given in each panel. No absorption lines shows a >2σ variability between any of the epochs except for the Ne viii λλ770, 780 transitions which show ∼4σ variability, in the bottom panel, between Epoch-1′ and Epoch-3.
In the bottom panel of Fig. 2, we show the Sij distribution as calculated between Epoch-1′ and Epoch-3 (|$S_{1^\prime 3}$|). Here also we find that none, but two of the absorption lines, shows variability with a significance of >2σ. A Gaussian fit to the |$S_{1^\prime 3}$| distribution results in similar μ and σ values as we obtained for the S12 distribution. The two absorption lines showing ∼4σ variation are the Ne viii λ770 and λ780 of the mini-BAL outflow (see Appendix A). Clearly, the variations are statistically significant and cannot be attributed to some systematic uncertainties. The N iv line, however, does not show any considerable variability between Epoch-1′ and Epoch-3, e.g. shows only a −0.4σ variation. Moreover, the O iv line shows only a ∼0.2σ variation between Epoch-1 and Epoch-3.

The Ne viii covering fraction against the outflow velocity (relative to the zem) for the two different epochs. The thick blue curve represents Epoch-1′, whereas the thin red curve is for Epoch-3. The median fc values as shown by the horizontal dashed lines exhibit an increase from 0.59 ± 0.05 (std) to 0.72 ± 0.03 (std) from the Epoch-1′ to Epoch-3. The height of the shaded horizontal bars represent the 1σ range in the measured fc values. Note that the fc measurements in the grey shaded region are not reliable due to an unknown blend in the red wing of the Ne viii λ780 absorption.
Finally, in order to evaluate whether the Ne viii column density has increased with time, we perform EW measurements in the covering fraction corrected spectra (i.e. the spectra obtained by inverting the equation 2). For both the Epoch-1′ and Epoch-3 data we measure EWobs(Ne viii λ770) = 2.00 ± 0.04 Å. Thus, no significant change in Ne viii EW is noticeable in the partial coverage-corrected spectra. A change in |$N({\rm Ne\,{\small VIII}})$| without a significant change in EW is possible in the flat part of the curve of growth. However the fact that we do not see any change in the wings of the profile indicates no considerable change in |$N({\rm Ne\,{\small VIII}})$| over the course of 2.8 months in the QSO's rest frame.
3.2 Properties of the background QSO
The UV bright QSO PG 1206+459 has a V-band magnitude of ∼15.4. The Catalina Real-Time Transient Survey (CRTS; Drake et al. 2009) light curve, shown in Fig. 4, indicates very little fluctuation in the V-band magnitude and hence in the continuum flux. In addition, no significant variation in the UV continuum is seen in the COS data. We found a maximum of only ∼30 per cent variation in the UV flux between Epoch-1′ and Epoch-3. Using the Mg ii emission line width, Chand, Wiita & Gupta (2010) have estimated a black hole mass of MBH ∼ 109 M⊙ for this QSO which corresponds to a Schwarzschild radius of RSch ∼ 3 × 1014 cm. Following Hall et al. (2011), we estimate the diameter of the disc within which 90 per cent of the 2700 Å continuum is emitted, D2700 ∼ 50 RSch ∼ 1.3 × 1016 cm.3 From the rest frame 1350 Å flux (i.e. ∼5 × 10−15 erg cm−2 s−1 Å− 1), measured from the STIS spectrum, we obtain the broad line region (BLR) size of RBLR ∼ 0.7–0.9 pc by adopting the R–L(1350Å) relation given in Kilerci Eser et al. (2015).

The CRTS V-band magnitudes of QSO PG 1206+459 plotted against the modified Julian date (MJD). Clearly, the background source shows a negligible (<0.1 mag) variation over the entire MJD range. The Epoch-1 and Epoch-3 are indicated by the arrows.
4 DISCUSSION
We report on the variability in Ne viii absorption originating from a mini-BAL outflow from the QSO PG 1206+459 (zem = 1.163). The absorber is detected at zabs = 1.028 54 corresponding to an outflow velocity of ∼19 200 km s−1. The mini-BAL system, with Ne viii absorption kinematically spread over Δv ∼360 km s−1 and with a total column density of |$\log (N({\rm Ne\,{\small VIII}})/{\rm cm^{-2}}) > 16$|, was first reported in M13 (see their table 2). Here we report a ∼4σ variation in the observed EWs of the Ne viii λ770 and λ780 absorption lines over a time-scale of 2.8 months in the QSO's rest frame. Such variations cannot be attributed to systematic uncertainties since the neighbouring unrelated, intervening absorption do not vary with such a high significance. This is the first reported case of an EUV mini-BAL variability. However, we did not observe any considerable variation in the Ne viii absorption troughs on a time-scale of ∼3.2 d in the QSO's rest frame. Additionally, two other low-ionization species (O iv and N iv) with multi-epoch observations do not exhibit any appreciable variation at any time, e.g. show <2σ variations. Note that the mini-BAL absorbers in the sample of Misawa et al. (2014) show <2σ variability over a similar time-scale. Thus a ∼4σ absorption variability in Ne viii over 2.8 months in the QSO's rest frame is somewhat extreme. However, we point out that the mini-BAL absorbers in their sample are detected via Si iv, C iv, and N v absorption lines which have ionization potentials (IPs) similar to N iv and O iv. The lack of significant variability in N iv and O iv lines in the present system, therefore, is consistent with the observations of Misawa et al. (2014).
As mentioned in Section 1, the change in ionization state of the absorber and the change in fc due to absorber's motions are the two most plausible reasons for absorption variability. Below we discuss the two scenarios in detail.
4.1 Variability due to change in ionization
Variation in the optical depth of an absorption line (i.e. variability) naturally occurs due to the change in ionization state of the absorbing gas. The change in ionization state of photoionized gas can be induced via a change in the ionizing continuum. In the ‘screening gas’ scenario of Misawa et al. (2007), the change in optical depth of ‘screening gas’ can also lead to absorption line variability. Nevertheless, variation in the continuum flux is thought to be the most probable reason for the variation in the optical depth of ‘screening gas’. Here we have found that the V-band magnitude and/or the UV continuum of the background QSO do not show any significant variation (Section 3.2). The weak variation (up to 30 per cent) seen in the UV continuum will not change the Ne viii column density appreciably. This is because |$N({\rm Ne\,{\small VIII}})$| reaches at its peak around ionization parameter of log U ∼1 and shows a very little change over a wide range in log U around the peak, i.e. log U ∼0.5–1.5 (see fig. 12 of M13 for example). Thus a maximum of 30 per cent change in log U induced by the change in the UV continuum, assuming the shape of the ionizing spectrum is not changing, will not be discernible. Furthermore, the total column density of Ne viii as given in M13 (i.e. log (N/cm−2) > 16, after correcting for the partial coverage) indicates that the profiles are too heavily saturated to be susceptible to the change in the ionization state. Finally, the lack of any considerable variation in the ‘true’ Ne viii EWs, as measured from the partial coverage-corrected spectra, and the lack of any change in the wings of the Ne viii profile (Section 3.1) indicates that it is highly unlikely that the observed line variation is due to the change in ionization state of the absorbing gas.
4.2 Variability due to absorber's motion
Motions of the absorbing gas cloud, transverse to the line of sight, could result in a change in fc and hence in the ‘apparent’ optical depth of absorption. In Section 3.1, we have shown that the fc of the gas phase giving rise to the Ne viii absorption shows an increase from fc = 0.59 ± 0.05 to 0.72 ± 0.03 over a time-scale of 2.8 months in the QSO's rest frame. Such an increase in fc value can occur primarily because of the two reasons: (i) transverse expansion of the absorbing gas cloud, and/or (ii) absorber's bulk motions across the line of sight.
4.2.1 Expansion across the line of sight
If the entire absorber is already within our cylinder of sight, then any transverse motion will lead to a decrease in fc in contrast to what we observe here. Nevertheless, a gas cloud, without a significant transverse motion, can expand in size and consequently increase the covering fraction. In this scenario, in Epoch-1, the transverse size of the absorbing gas cloud is estimated to be |$r_{\perp }=\sqrt{f}_{{\rm c}} D_{2700}/2 \sim 5.0\times 10^{15}$| cm. An increase in radius from r1 to r2, due to expansion, will increase the covering fraction from f1 to f2 via the relation: |$r_1/r_2 = \sqrt{f_1/f_2}$|. The fact that the Ne viii covering fraction increases from ∼0.59 to ∼0.72 in the rest frame 2.8 months allows us to estimate an expansion rate of ∼720 km s−1. If this were adiabatic expansion at the speed of sound, then it would imply a temperature of ∼4 × 107 K. But such a high temperature is incompatible with the ionization states of metals that we observe in the absorber.
More than 14 absorption troughs from eight different low- (e.g. O iv, N iv, N v) and high- (e.g. Ne viii, Na ix, Mg x) ions are detected from this system (see fig. 7 of M13). Interestingly, in M13, we have shown that these ions exhibit ionization potential (IP) dependent covering fractions with higher ions covering more of the continuum emitting region. For example, the N iv and O iv have fc values of ∼0.4 and 0.2, respectively, as opposed to ∼0.6 we measured for the Ne viii. Such observations clearly suggest multiphase structure of the absorber with different ions having different projected area across the line of sight. Different phases of a multiphase photoionized absorber are often found to have very different densities and temperatures causing pressure gradients in the absorbing gas (e.g. Muzahid et al. 2012). Such pressure gradients could, eventually, lead to an expansion.
It is evident from fig. 12 of M13 that |$N({\rm Ne\,{\small VIII}})$| peaks at log U = 1.0, whereas, |$N({\rm O\,{\small IV}})$| and |$N({\rm N\,{\small IV}})$| peaks at log U = −1.0. Note that the photoionization equilibrium temperatures for the high- and low-ionization phases are T ∼ 105 and ∼104 K, respectively. At these temperatures, the gas-pressures for both the phases are at least 2 orders of magnitude higher than the corresponding radiation pressures, for the whole range of densities. Therefore, the total pressure, dominated by the gas pressure, of the low-ionization phase is a factor of ∼10 higher than that of the high-ionization phase. As a consequence, it is natural for the low-ionization gas phase to exhibit a more rapid expansion than the Ne viii bearing gas. However, we do not find any appreciable variability in the N iv and/or O iv absorption. Hence, the expansion scenario, although highly plausible in case of a multiphase absorber, cannot explain our observations. In view of the above arguments, we disfavour the expansion interpretation for the change in fc in this system.
4.2.2 Bulk motions across the line of sight

Left: a simple model of a transiting cloud. The cloud with a radius Rc is crossing the disc with a radius Rd. The cloud's centre is separated by a distance of d from the centre of the disc. The covering fraction of the cloud is the ratio of the area common to both the circles (A) to the total area of the disc. Right: the covering fraction as a function of κ ≡ d/Rd, assuming Rc ∼ Rd.
A detailed photoionization model for this absorber was presented in M13. Here we recall the important model parameters: i.e. log U ∼1, metallicity of [X/H] ∼1.0, and total hydrogen column density of log (NH/cm−2) = 20.7. Inserting rd = 1.3 pc in equation (4) of M13,4 we calculate the density of the Ne viii bearing gas to be nH ∼ 5.3 × 106 cm−3. Given the density, the line-of-sight thickness of the cloud turns out to be δr = NH/nH ∼ 9.5 × 1013 cm. On the other hand, since the absorber covers at least ∼60 per cent of the continuum emitting region, the minimum transverse size of the absorber is |$r_{\perp } = \sqrt{f}_{\rm c} D_{2700}/2 \sim 5.0\times 10^{15}$| cm. Evidently, r⊥ > 50δr, which is suggestive of a ‘sheet-like’ geometry.
In a standard thin-shell model, the kinetic luminosity of an outflow can be expressed as |$\dot{E}_{{\rm k}} = 4\pi \mu m_{{\rm p}} C_{\Omega } C_{{\rm f}} N_{\rm H} r_{\rm d} v^3$|, where, mp is the proton mass, μ = 1.4 accounts for the mass of helium, and |$C_\Omega$| and Cf are, respectively, the global and local covering fractions (see appendix C of Muzahid et al. 2015b). In M13, we have shown that 40 per cent of the intermediate redshift QSOs exhibit highly ionized outflows detected via the Ne viii absorption. Therefore, |$C_\Omega$| can be taken as 0.4 for the general population. However, we note that the outflow velocity (∼19 200 km s−1) we measure for this system is very rare. Only 1 out of 20 QSOs shows such a high-outflow velocity. We, thus, conservatively use |$C_\Omega = 1/20$| for our calculations. The Cf is related to the clumpiness of the absorbing material. For simplicity, Cf is taken to be unity for the highly ionized diffuse gas. Using the distance rd ∼1.3 pc, derived from our simple model, we estimate a kinetic luminosity of |$\dot{E}_{{\rm k}}\sim 2.1\times 10^{43}$| erg s−1. The |$\dot{E}_{{\rm k}}$| value increases to ∼1.7 × 1044 erg s−1 if we assume |$C_\Omega = 0.4$|. Note that the |$\dot{E}_{{\rm k}}$| of ∼1043−44 erg s−1 is among the highest kinetic luminosities measured till date (see table 10 of Dunn et al. 2010). Such large kinetic luminosities suggest that the outflows detected via the Ne viii absorption are potentially major contributors to AGN feedback.
It is now important to address whether we could explain the lack of variability in the low-ionization lines, i.e. O iv and N iv, with our simple model. Naively one would expect that the low-ionization gas phase would trace a high-density, compact region. In M13, using O iv λ608 and λ787 transitions, we determined the O iv covering fraction to be ∼0.2. Therefore, the transverse size of the low-ionization gas phase, giving rise to O iv (and N iv) absorption, is only a factor of ∼2 smaller than the Ne viii bearing gas. The fact that all the high- and low-ionization lines coincide in velocity, possibly, indicates that the gas phases are co-spatial with the low-ionization lines stemming from the core of the absorber with a lower fc value. While such a scenario is reasonable, the difference in transverse sizes is not quite significant.
We recall that according to equation (1), the change in EW, and hence in Sij, depends on the EW itself. From Fig. 1, it is evident that the both O iv (EW = 0.37 ± 0.05 Å) and N iv (EW = 0.74 ± 0.03 Å) lines are much weaker than the Ne viii (EW = 1.18 ± 0.04 Å). Thus, one possibility here is that variations in those weak lines, O iv in particular, are below our detection limit. In order to check that, we estimated the Sij value for O iv in the partial coverage corrected spectra. However, we did not find any significant variation. Higher S/N multi-epoch observations are essential for reaching a firm conclusion on the degree of variability of these ions. As noted earlier, the lack of appreciable variation in the low-ionization species over a time-scale of 2.8 months, however, is consistent with the recent observations by Misawa et al. (2014).
5 SUMMARY
We have studied the variability of the Ne viii λλ770, 780 doublet originating from a mini-BAL outflow with an ejection velocity of ∼19 200 km s−1 from the UV bright QSO PG 1206+459 (zem = 1.163). This is the first case of mini-BAL variability detected in EUV transitions. The Ne viii doublet shows variability with a ∼4σ significance over a time-scale of 2.8 months in the QSO's rest frame. However, no significant variation is observed over a shorter time-scale of 3.2 d. Additionally, we did not observe any appreciable variation in lower ionization O iv and N iv lines.
We have explored three different possibilities for the observed variability: (1) change in the ionization conditions, (2) expansion of the absorber, and (3) bulk motion of the absorbing gas across the line of sight. From the lack of variability in the partial coverage-corrected spectra and estimated large column density of Ne viii (N > 1016 cm−2), we rule out the possibility of a change in ionization conditions. The expansion scenario leads to an unreasonably high gas temperature that is inconsistent with the ionization state of the detected metal lines. Besides, we note that the low-ionization lines should exhibit a more rapid expansion than the Ne viii in contrast to what we observed here. We favoured a scenario in which the absorbing gas is entering into the cylinder of sight and hence showing an increase in covering fraction. Using a simple model of a transiting cloud, with a size on the order of the continuum emitting region, we derived the transverse speed, distance from the central engine, density, and kinetic luminosity of the outflow. In order to explain the lack of variability in the low-ionization lines, we preferred a multiphase structure of the absorbing gas in which the low-ionization species stem from the core of the absorber with lower fc values and presumably already in the cylinder of sight. Nonetheless, the transverse size of the low-ionization gas phase is only a factor of ∼2 smaller than that of the high-ionization phase, posing an apparent tension to our favoured scenario. High S/N, multi-epoch observations are needed for a firm conclusion on the variability of the weak, low-ionization lines.
Eight different ions with a wide range in IPs (i.e. 40–400 eV) are detected in this absorber (see figs 7 & 8 of M13). A study of both short-term and long-term variability with multi-epoch |$\it HST$| observations, in future, for more than 10 absorption troughs would provide further insights on the dynamics and the structure of this intriguing mini-BAL outflow.
We would like to thank the anonymous referee for constructive suggestions which improved the manuscript. SM thankfully acknowledges IUCAA (India) for providing hospitality where a part of the work was done. SM also thanks Chris Culliton for useful discussion and carefully reading an earlier version of the manuscript. JC and ME acknowledge support from grant AST–1312686 from the National Science Foundation.
We do not use lines within ∼20 Å from both blue and red end of the spectra due to wavelength calibration uncertainty.
O iv λ787 is not considered here since it is not covered in Epoch-2 data.
We note that the MBH and the rest frame 3000 Å luminosity of the present source are, respectively, ∼3 times lower and ∼5 times higher than the one studied by Hall et al. (2011). The facts ensure that the disc temperatures, and hence the size of the continuum emitting regions, are consistent with each other at ∼15 per cent level.
|$\log (\frac{n_{\rm H}}{10^{5}\rm cm^{-3}}) = \log L_{912\,\mathring{\rm A}}^{30} - \log (\frac{r_d}{100 \ \rm pc})^2 - \log U - 1.25$|, where |$\log L_{912 \ \mathring{\rm A}}^{30} = 32.1$|, is the monochromatic luminosity of the QSO at the Lyman continuum in units of 1030 erg s−1 Hz−1.
REFERENCES
APPENDIX A: Summary of EWs and Sij measurements
λ1 (Å) . | λ2 (Å) . | EW1 (Å) . | EW2 (Å) . | S12 . | |$\rm EW_{1^\prime }$| (Å) . | EW3 (Å) . | |$S_{1^\prime 3}$| . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . | (7) . | (8) . |
1460.7441 | 1462.1398 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | − 0.6 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | − 1.3 |
1463.0298 | 1464.7288 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | − 0.5 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | − 0.9 |
1464.6884 | 1467.8639 | 1.27 ± 0.03 | 1.26 ± 0.03 | − 0.1 | 1.24 ± 0.02 | 1.24 ± 0.03 | 0.0 |
1468.5472 | 1470.6407 | 0.85 ± 0.03 | 0.79 ± 0.03 | − 1.7 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 0.77 ± 0.02 | − 1.7 |
1471.0566 | 1472.1326 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 0.59 ± 0.02 | − 1.4 | 0.64 ± 0.01 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | − 1.2 |
1474.4214 | 1475.6957 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | 0.89 ± 0.02 | − 1.1 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | − 0.5 |
1475.6957 | 1477.9813 | 1.17 ± 0.02 | 1.17 ± 0.03 | 0.0 | 1.18 ± 0.02 | 1.19 ± 0.02 | 0.4 |
1479.3688 | 1480.5581 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 1.8 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.7 |
1481.4803 | 1483.7620 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | − 0.3 |
1484.2960 | 1486.0920 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | − 0.0 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.02 | 1.2 |
1501.3752 | 1502.8315 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | − 1.1 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | − 0.8 |
1503.6245 | 1504.5574 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | − 1.7 |
1508.1309 | 1511.7717 | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.3 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 0.38 ± 0.04 | − 0.3 |
1513.8568 | 1515.2911 | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | − 1.5 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.2 |
1515.5824 | 1517.8801 | 1.47 ± 0.02 | 1.44 ± 0.03 | − 1.0 | 1.46 ± 0.02 | 1.49 ± 0.02 | 1.1 |
1517.8801 | 1519.3525 | 0.99 ± 0.02 | 0.99 ± 0.02 | − 0.2 | 1.00 ± 0.01 | 1.01 ± 0.02 | 0.3 |
1522.9287 | 1524.4659 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | − 1.2 |
1525.8251 | 1527.4271 | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.62 ± 0.03 | − 0.6 | 0.62 ± 0.02 | 0.63 ± 0.03 | 0.4 |
1530.4724 | 1531.2815 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | − 1.8 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | − 0.3 |
1532.8252 | 1534.3689 | 0.36 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.03 | − 0.7 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.4 |
1536.3785 | 1538.2524 | 0.70 ± 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.73 ± 0.02 | 0.75 ± 0.03 | 0.5 |
1547.2039 | 1548.5242 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 1.1 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 0.4 |
1548.8058 | 1551.0970 | 0.80 ± 0.04 | 0.73 ± 0.04 | − 1.1 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.69 ± 0.04 | − 1.1 |
1551.1261 | 1553.3009 | 0.78 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.05 | − 1.0 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.72 ± 0.04 | − 0.4a |
1561.0355 | 1564.2556 | 1.21 ± 0.05 | 1.23 ± 0.06 | 0.3 | 1.18 ± 0.04 | 1.43 ± 0.04 | 4.3b |
1564.8542 | 1565.9384 | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | − 0.5 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.3 |
1580.8251 | 1584.6600 | 1.48 ± 0.06 | 1.27 ± 0.09 | − 1.9 | 1.39 ± 0.05 | 1.69 ± 0.05 | 4.0c |
1633.3333 | 1635.2345 | 0.65 ± 0.04 | 0.66 ± 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.69 ± 0.03 | 0.63 ± 0.04 | − 1.1 |
1635.5581 | 1639.5630 | 1.18 ± 0.07 | 1.07 ± 0.08 | − 1.1 | 1.14 ± 0.05 | 1.05 ± 0.06 | − 1.1 |
1644.7046 | 1647.4554 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 0.39 ± 0.07 | 0.6 | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.06 | − 1.0 |
1652.1115 | 1655.0240 | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 0.62 ± 0.07 | 1.3 | 0.55 ± 0.05 | 0.56 ± 0.06 | 0.1 |
1669.7450 | 1672.0913 | 0.90 ± 0.05 | 0.83 ± 0.05 | − 1.0 | 0.85 ± 0.04 | 0.83 ± 0.05 | − 0.3 |
1693.5436 | 1694.5145 | 0.23 ± 0.04 | 0.22 ± 0.04 | − 0.1 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | − 0.8 |
1710.5782 | 1713.4303 | 1.03 ± 0.07 | 1.07 ± 0.07 | 0.5 | 1.05 ± 0.05 | 1.14 ± 0.06 | 1.2 |
1718.1025 | 1720.0240 | 0.61 ± 0.06 | 0.56 ± 0.07 | − 0.5 | 0.60 ± 0.05 | 0.61 ± 0.06 | 0.2 |
1726.7717 | 1728.6649 | 0.69 ± 0.06 | 0.71 ± 0.06 | 0.3 | 0.67 ± 0.05 | 0.72 ± 0.05 | 0.7 |
1734.0371 | 1736.1002 | 0.90 ± 0.06 | 0.98 ± 0.06 | 0.9 | 0.92 ± 0.05 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 1.2 |
1739.0291 | 1743.6892 | 2.41 ± 0.13 | 2.56 ± 0.09 | 0.9 | 2.47 ± 0.07 | 2.41 ± 0.08 | − 0.6 |
1750.1213 | 1751.5032 | 0.65 ± 0.05 | 0.70 ± 0.05 | 0.7 | 0.69 ± 0.04 | 0.62 ± 0.05 | − 1.1 |
λ1 (Å) . | λ2 (Å) . | EW1 (Å) . | EW2 (Å) . | S12 . | |$\rm EW_{1^\prime }$| (Å) . | EW3 (Å) . | |$S_{1^\prime 3}$| . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . | (7) . | (8) . |
1460.7441 | 1462.1398 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | − 0.6 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | − 1.3 |
1463.0298 | 1464.7288 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | − 0.5 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | − 0.9 |
1464.6884 | 1467.8639 | 1.27 ± 0.03 | 1.26 ± 0.03 | − 0.1 | 1.24 ± 0.02 | 1.24 ± 0.03 | 0.0 |
1468.5472 | 1470.6407 | 0.85 ± 0.03 | 0.79 ± 0.03 | − 1.7 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 0.77 ± 0.02 | − 1.7 |
1471.0566 | 1472.1326 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 0.59 ± 0.02 | − 1.4 | 0.64 ± 0.01 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | − 1.2 |
1474.4214 | 1475.6957 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | 0.89 ± 0.02 | − 1.1 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | − 0.5 |
1475.6957 | 1477.9813 | 1.17 ± 0.02 | 1.17 ± 0.03 | 0.0 | 1.18 ± 0.02 | 1.19 ± 0.02 | 0.4 |
1479.3688 | 1480.5581 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 1.8 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.7 |
1481.4803 | 1483.7620 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | − 0.3 |
1484.2960 | 1486.0920 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | − 0.0 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.02 | 1.2 |
1501.3752 | 1502.8315 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | − 1.1 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | − 0.8 |
1503.6245 | 1504.5574 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | − 1.7 |
1508.1309 | 1511.7717 | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.3 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 0.38 ± 0.04 | − 0.3 |
1513.8568 | 1515.2911 | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | − 1.5 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.2 |
1515.5824 | 1517.8801 | 1.47 ± 0.02 | 1.44 ± 0.03 | − 1.0 | 1.46 ± 0.02 | 1.49 ± 0.02 | 1.1 |
1517.8801 | 1519.3525 | 0.99 ± 0.02 | 0.99 ± 0.02 | − 0.2 | 1.00 ± 0.01 | 1.01 ± 0.02 | 0.3 |
1522.9287 | 1524.4659 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | − 1.2 |
1525.8251 | 1527.4271 | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.62 ± 0.03 | − 0.6 | 0.62 ± 0.02 | 0.63 ± 0.03 | 0.4 |
1530.4724 | 1531.2815 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | − 1.8 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | − 0.3 |
1532.8252 | 1534.3689 | 0.36 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.03 | − 0.7 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.4 |
1536.3785 | 1538.2524 | 0.70 ± 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.73 ± 0.02 | 0.75 ± 0.03 | 0.5 |
1547.2039 | 1548.5242 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 1.1 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 0.4 |
1548.8058 | 1551.0970 | 0.80 ± 0.04 | 0.73 ± 0.04 | − 1.1 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.69 ± 0.04 | − 1.1 |
1551.1261 | 1553.3009 | 0.78 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.05 | − 1.0 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.72 ± 0.04 | − 0.4a |
1561.0355 | 1564.2556 | 1.21 ± 0.05 | 1.23 ± 0.06 | 0.3 | 1.18 ± 0.04 | 1.43 ± 0.04 | 4.3b |
1564.8542 | 1565.9384 | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | − 0.5 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.3 |
1580.8251 | 1584.6600 | 1.48 ± 0.06 | 1.27 ± 0.09 | − 1.9 | 1.39 ± 0.05 | 1.69 ± 0.05 | 4.0c |
1633.3333 | 1635.2345 | 0.65 ± 0.04 | 0.66 ± 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.69 ± 0.03 | 0.63 ± 0.04 | − 1.1 |
1635.5581 | 1639.5630 | 1.18 ± 0.07 | 1.07 ± 0.08 | − 1.1 | 1.14 ± 0.05 | 1.05 ± 0.06 | − 1.1 |
1644.7046 | 1647.4554 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 0.39 ± 0.07 | 0.6 | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.06 | − 1.0 |
1652.1115 | 1655.0240 | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 0.62 ± 0.07 | 1.3 | 0.55 ± 0.05 | 0.56 ± 0.06 | 0.1 |
1669.7450 | 1672.0913 | 0.90 ± 0.05 | 0.83 ± 0.05 | − 1.0 | 0.85 ± 0.04 | 0.83 ± 0.05 | − 0.3 |
1693.5436 | 1694.5145 | 0.23 ± 0.04 | 0.22 ± 0.04 | − 0.1 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | − 0.8 |
1710.5782 | 1713.4303 | 1.03 ± 0.07 | 1.07 ± 0.07 | 0.5 | 1.05 ± 0.05 | 1.14 ± 0.06 | 1.2 |
1718.1025 | 1720.0240 | 0.61 ± 0.06 | 0.56 ± 0.07 | − 0.5 | 0.60 ± 0.05 | 0.61 ± 0.06 | 0.2 |
1726.7717 | 1728.6649 | 0.69 ± 0.06 | 0.71 ± 0.06 | 0.3 | 0.67 ± 0.05 | 0.72 ± 0.05 | 0.7 |
1734.0371 | 1736.1002 | 0.90 ± 0.06 | 0.98 ± 0.06 | 0.9 | 0.92 ± 0.05 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 1.2 |
1739.0291 | 1743.6892 | 2.41 ± 0.13 | 2.56 ± 0.09 | 0.9 | 2.47 ± 0.07 | 2.41 ± 0.08 | − 0.6 |
1750.1213 | 1751.5032 | 0.65 ± 0.05 | 0.70 ± 0.05 | 0.7 | 0.69 ± 0.04 | 0.62 ± 0.05 | − 1.1 |
Notes. List of 39 strong absorption lines that are detected in Epoch-1, Epoch-2, and Epoch-3 data with EW/σEW > 5. Columns 1 and 2 are the lower and upper bounds of wavelengths, respectively, within which EWs are measured. Columns 3 and 4 are the observed EWs in Epoch-1 and Epoch-2 data, respectively. Columns 6 and 7 are the observed EWs in Epoch-1′ and Epoch-3 data, respectively. The 1σ errors in EW measurements (i.e. σEW) are calculated after incorporating the continuum placement uncertainties. Columns 5 and 8 are the Sij values as defined in equation (1). aN ivλ765, bNe viii λ770, and cNe viii λ780 absorption lines from the mini-BAL outflow studied here.
λ1 (Å) . | λ2 (Å) . | EW1 (Å) . | EW2 (Å) . | S12 . | |$\rm EW_{1^\prime }$| (Å) . | EW3 (Å) . | |$S_{1^\prime 3}$| . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . | (7) . | (8) . |
1460.7441 | 1462.1398 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | − 0.6 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | − 1.3 |
1463.0298 | 1464.7288 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | − 0.5 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | − 0.9 |
1464.6884 | 1467.8639 | 1.27 ± 0.03 | 1.26 ± 0.03 | − 0.1 | 1.24 ± 0.02 | 1.24 ± 0.03 | 0.0 |
1468.5472 | 1470.6407 | 0.85 ± 0.03 | 0.79 ± 0.03 | − 1.7 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 0.77 ± 0.02 | − 1.7 |
1471.0566 | 1472.1326 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 0.59 ± 0.02 | − 1.4 | 0.64 ± 0.01 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | − 1.2 |
1474.4214 | 1475.6957 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | 0.89 ± 0.02 | − 1.1 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | − 0.5 |
1475.6957 | 1477.9813 | 1.17 ± 0.02 | 1.17 ± 0.03 | 0.0 | 1.18 ± 0.02 | 1.19 ± 0.02 | 0.4 |
1479.3688 | 1480.5581 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 1.8 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.7 |
1481.4803 | 1483.7620 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | − 0.3 |
1484.2960 | 1486.0920 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | − 0.0 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.02 | 1.2 |
1501.3752 | 1502.8315 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | − 1.1 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | − 0.8 |
1503.6245 | 1504.5574 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | − 1.7 |
1508.1309 | 1511.7717 | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.3 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 0.38 ± 0.04 | − 0.3 |
1513.8568 | 1515.2911 | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | − 1.5 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.2 |
1515.5824 | 1517.8801 | 1.47 ± 0.02 | 1.44 ± 0.03 | − 1.0 | 1.46 ± 0.02 | 1.49 ± 0.02 | 1.1 |
1517.8801 | 1519.3525 | 0.99 ± 0.02 | 0.99 ± 0.02 | − 0.2 | 1.00 ± 0.01 | 1.01 ± 0.02 | 0.3 |
1522.9287 | 1524.4659 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | − 1.2 |
1525.8251 | 1527.4271 | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.62 ± 0.03 | − 0.6 | 0.62 ± 0.02 | 0.63 ± 0.03 | 0.4 |
1530.4724 | 1531.2815 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | − 1.8 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | − 0.3 |
1532.8252 | 1534.3689 | 0.36 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.03 | − 0.7 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.4 |
1536.3785 | 1538.2524 | 0.70 ± 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.73 ± 0.02 | 0.75 ± 0.03 | 0.5 |
1547.2039 | 1548.5242 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 1.1 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 0.4 |
1548.8058 | 1551.0970 | 0.80 ± 0.04 | 0.73 ± 0.04 | − 1.1 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.69 ± 0.04 | − 1.1 |
1551.1261 | 1553.3009 | 0.78 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.05 | − 1.0 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.72 ± 0.04 | − 0.4a |
1561.0355 | 1564.2556 | 1.21 ± 0.05 | 1.23 ± 0.06 | 0.3 | 1.18 ± 0.04 | 1.43 ± 0.04 | 4.3b |
1564.8542 | 1565.9384 | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | − 0.5 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.3 |
1580.8251 | 1584.6600 | 1.48 ± 0.06 | 1.27 ± 0.09 | − 1.9 | 1.39 ± 0.05 | 1.69 ± 0.05 | 4.0c |
1633.3333 | 1635.2345 | 0.65 ± 0.04 | 0.66 ± 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.69 ± 0.03 | 0.63 ± 0.04 | − 1.1 |
1635.5581 | 1639.5630 | 1.18 ± 0.07 | 1.07 ± 0.08 | − 1.1 | 1.14 ± 0.05 | 1.05 ± 0.06 | − 1.1 |
1644.7046 | 1647.4554 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 0.39 ± 0.07 | 0.6 | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.06 | − 1.0 |
1652.1115 | 1655.0240 | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 0.62 ± 0.07 | 1.3 | 0.55 ± 0.05 | 0.56 ± 0.06 | 0.1 |
1669.7450 | 1672.0913 | 0.90 ± 0.05 | 0.83 ± 0.05 | − 1.0 | 0.85 ± 0.04 | 0.83 ± 0.05 | − 0.3 |
1693.5436 | 1694.5145 | 0.23 ± 0.04 | 0.22 ± 0.04 | − 0.1 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | − 0.8 |
1710.5782 | 1713.4303 | 1.03 ± 0.07 | 1.07 ± 0.07 | 0.5 | 1.05 ± 0.05 | 1.14 ± 0.06 | 1.2 |
1718.1025 | 1720.0240 | 0.61 ± 0.06 | 0.56 ± 0.07 | − 0.5 | 0.60 ± 0.05 | 0.61 ± 0.06 | 0.2 |
1726.7717 | 1728.6649 | 0.69 ± 0.06 | 0.71 ± 0.06 | 0.3 | 0.67 ± 0.05 | 0.72 ± 0.05 | 0.7 |
1734.0371 | 1736.1002 | 0.90 ± 0.06 | 0.98 ± 0.06 | 0.9 | 0.92 ± 0.05 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 1.2 |
1739.0291 | 1743.6892 | 2.41 ± 0.13 | 2.56 ± 0.09 | 0.9 | 2.47 ± 0.07 | 2.41 ± 0.08 | − 0.6 |
1750.1213 | 1751.5032 | 0.65 ± 0.05 | 0.70 ± 0.05 | 0.7 | 0.69 ± 0.04 | 0.62 ± 0.05 | − 1.1 |
λ1 (Å) . | λ2 (Å) . | EW1 (Å) . | EW2 (Å) . | S12 . | |$\rm EW_{1^\prime }$| (Å) . | EW3 (Å) . | |$S_{1^\prime 3}$| . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . | (7) . | (8) . |
1460.7441 | 1462.1398 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | − 0.6 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | − 1.3 |
1463.0298 | 1464.7288 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | − 0.5 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | − 0.9 |
1464.6884 | 1467.8639 | 1.27 ± 0.03 | 1.26 ± 0.03 | − 0.1 | 1.24 ± 0.02 | 1.24 ± 0.03 | 0.0 |
1468.5472 | 1470.6407 | 0.85 ± 0.03 | 0.79 ± 0.03 | − 1.7 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 0.77 ± 0.02 | − 1.7 |
1471.0566 | 1472.1326 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 0.59 ± 0.02 | − 1.4 | 0.64 ± 0.01 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | − 1.2 |
1474.4214 | 1475.6957 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | 0.89 ± 0.02 | − 1.1 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | − 0.5 |
1475.6957 | 1477.9813 | 1.17 ± 0.02 | 1.17 ± 0.03 | 0.0 | 1.18 ± 0.02 | 1.19 ± 0.02 | 0.4 |
1479.3688 | 1480.5581 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 1.8 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.7 |
1481.4803 | 1483.7620 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | − 0.3 |
1484.2960 | 1486.0920 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | − 0.0 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.02 | 1.2 |
1501.3752 | 1502.8315 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | − 1.1 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | − 0.8 |
1503.6245 | 1504.5574 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | − 1.7 |
1508.1309 | 1511.7717 | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.3 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 0.38 ± 0.04 | − 0.3 |
1513.8568 | 1515.2911 | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | − 1.5 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.2 |
1515.5824 | 1517.8801 | 1.47 ± 0.02 | 1.44 ± 0.03 | − 1.0 | 1.46 ± 0.02 | 1.49 ± 0.02 | 1.1 |
1517.8801 | 1519.3525 | 0.99 ± 0.02 | 0.99 ± 0.02 | − 0.2 | 1.00 ± 0.01 | 1.01 ± 0.02 | 0.3 |
1522.9287 | 1524.4659 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | − 1.2 |
1525.8251 | 1527.4271 | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.62 ± 0.03 | − 0.6 | 0.62 ± 0.02 | 0.63 ± 0.03 | 0.4 |
1530.4724 | 1531.2815 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | − 1.8 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | − 0.3 |
1532.8252 | 1534.3689 | 0.36 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.03 | − 0.7 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.4 |
1536.3785 | 1538.2524 | 0.70 ± 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.73 ± 0.02 | 0.75 ± 0.03 | 0.5 |
1547.2039 | 1548.5242 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 1.1 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 0.4 |
1548.8058 | 1551.0970 | 0.80 ± 0.04 | 0.73 ± 0.04 | − 1.1 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.69 ± 0.04 | − 1.1 |
1551.1261 | 1553.3009 | 0.78 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.05 | − 1.0 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.72 ± 0.04 | − 0.4a |
1561.0355 | 1564.2556 | 1.21 ± 0.05 | 1.23 ± 0.06 | 0.3 | 1.18 ± 0.04 | 1.43 ± 0.04 | 4.3b |
1564.8542 | 1565.9384 | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | − 0.5 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.3 |
1580.8251 | 1584.6600 | 1.48 ± 0.06 | 1.27 ± 0.09 | − 1.9 | 1.39 ± 0.05 | 1.69 ± 0.05 | 4.0c |
1633.3333 | 1635.2345 | 0.65 ± 0.04 | 0.66 ± 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.69 ± 0.03 | 0.63 ± 0.04 | − 1.1 |
1635.5581 | 1639.5630 | 1.18 ± 0.07 | 1.07 ± 0.08 | − 1.1 | 1.14 ± 0.05 | 1.05 ± 0.06 | − 1.1 |
1644.7046 | 1647.4554 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 0.39 ± 0.07 | 0.6 | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.06 | − 1.0 |
1652.1115 | 1655.0240 | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 0.62 ± 0.07 | 1.3 | 0.55 ± 0.05 | 0.56 ± 0.06 | 0.1 |
1669.7450 | 1672.0913 | 0.90 ± 0.05 | 0.83 ± 0.05 | − 1.0 | 0.85 ± 0.04 | 0.83 ± 0.05 | − 0.3 |
1693.5436 | 1694.5145 | 0.23 ± 0.04 | 0.22 ± 0.04 | − 0.1 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | − 0.8 |
1710.5782 | 1713.4303 | 1.03 ± 0.07 | 1.07 ± 0.07 | 0.5 | 1.05 ± 0.05 | 1.14 ± 0.06 | 1.2 |
1718.1025 | 1720.0240 | 0.61 ± 0.06 | 0.56 ± 0.07 | − 0.5 | 0.60 ± 0.05 | 0.61 ± 0.06 | 0.2 |
1726.7717 | 1728.6649 | 0.69 ± 0.06 | 0.71 ± 0.06 | 0.3 | 0.67 ± 0.05 | 0.72 ± 0.05 | 0.7 |
1734.0371 | 1736.1002 | 0.90 ± 0.06 | 0.98 ± 0.06 | 0.9 | 0.92 ± 0.05 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 1.2 |
1739.0291 | 1743.6892 | 2.41 ± 0.13 | 2.56 ± 0.09 | 0.9 | 2.47 ± 0.07 | 2.41 ± 0.08 | − 0.6 |
1750.1213 | 1751.5032 | 0.65 ± 0.05 | 0.70 ± 0.05 | 0.7 | 0.69 ± 0.04 | 0.62 ± 0.05 | − 1.1 |
Notes. List of 39 strong absorption lines that are detected in Epoch-1, Epoch-2, and Epoch-3 data with EW/σEW > 5. Columns 1 and 2 are the lower and upper bounds of wavelengths, respectively, within which EWs are measured. Columns 3 and 4 are the observed EWs in Epoch-1 and Epoch-2 data, respectively. Columns 6 and 7 are the observed EWs in Epoch-1′ and Epoch-3 data, respectively. The 1σ errors in EW measurements (i.e. σEW) are calculated after incorporating the continuum placement uncertainties. Columns 5 and 8 are the Sij values as defined in equation (1). aN ivλ765, bNe viii λ770, and cNe viii λ780 absorption lines from the mini-BAL outflow studied here.
APPENDIX B: Full Spectrum of PG 1206+459

Epoch-1′ spectrum of PG 1206+459 showing full wavelength coverage obtained using COS FUV (G130M+G160M) gratings. Error in each pixel is shown in blue. Continuum is shown by the smooth red curve. The absorption lines studied here are also marked. The wavelength ranges affected by the geo-coronal emission lines are indicated by the horizontal bars.