-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Jae Gyun Byun, Woo Kyun Lee, Moonil Kim, Doo Ahn Kwak, Hanbin Kwak, Taejin Park, Woo Hyuk Byun, Yowhan Son, Jung Kee Choi, Young Jin Lee, Joachim Saborowski, Dong Jun Chung, Jin Hyun Jung, Radial growth response of Pinus densiflora and Quercus spp. to topographic and climatic factors in South Korea, Journal of Plant Ecology, Volume 6, Issue 5, October 2013, Pages 380–392, https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtt001
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
This study aimed to develop radial growth models and to predict the potential spatial distribution of Pinus densiflora (Japanese red pine) and Quercus spp. (Oaks) in South Korea, considering topographic and climatic factors.
We used a dataset of diameter at breast height and radial growth estimates of individual trees, topographic and climatic factors in systematic sample plots distributed over the whole of South Korea. On the basis that radial growth is attributed primarily to tree age, we developed a radial growth model employing tree age as an explanatory variable. We estimated standard growth (SG), defined as radial growth of the tree at age 30, to eliminate the influence of tree age on radial growth. In addition, SG estimates including the Topographic Wetness Index, temperature and precipitation were calculated by the Generalized Additive Model.
As a result of variogram analysis of SG, we found spatial autocorrelation between SG, topographic and climatic factors. Incremental temperature had negative impacts on radial growth of P. densiflora and positive impacts on that of Quercus spp. Precipitation was associated with positive effects on both tree species. Based on the model, we found that radial growth of P. densiflora would be more vulnerable than that of Quercus spp. to climatic factors. Through simulation with the radial growth model, it was predicted that P. densiflora stands would be gradually replaced with Quercus spp. stands in eastern coastal and southern regions of South Korea in the future. The models developed in this study will be helpful for understanding the impact of climatic factors on tree growth and for predicting changes in distribution of P. densiflora and Quercus spp. due to climate change in South Korea.
INTRODUCTION
Forest tree growth is generally determined by environmental conditions such as precipitation, temperature, drought and soil (Schweingruber 1988; Du et al. 2013; Li et al. 2013; Muraoka et al. 2013; Tang et al. 2013). Recently, it has been well recognized that climate change also has impacts on the growth and spatial distribution of tree species (Neilson and Marks 1994; Box 1996; Kramer et al. 2000). Therefore, it is important to understand the relationship between forest growth and climatic factors in order to manage forest resources under changing climatic conditions (Seo and Park 2010).
Tree-ring growth has played an essential key role for identifying the growth response of trees to environmental and climatic variations (Fritts 1974, 1976). Annual tree-ring growth in climate-stressed sites has been shown to enable quantitative estimates of environmental variables such as monthly precipitation, temperature and solar radiation (Hughes et al. 1982; Stahle 1991). Biondi (2000) argued that studies of the relationship between climate and tree-ring growth are fundamental not only for the reconstruction of past climate but also for the estimation of future changes associated with anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. The sensitivity of tree-ring records to climatic factors has recently been reported as an important element for evaluating vulnerability of forests in connection to global warming phenomena (Briffa et al. 1998a, b).
Among factors that affect tree-ring growth, tree age can be used for modelling at the individual tree level, while competition and site quality can be used to estimate stand-level growth. It is obvious that climatic factors also influence tree growth (Fritts 1976; Graumlich and Brubaker 1986; Carrer and Urbinati 2006). However, distinct differences in climate are not apparent at small scales (e.g. the individual tree or stand level). Therefore, climatic factors should be used to explain tree-growth variation at large scales such as the regional or landscape level. If there exists differences of tree growth at the regional level due to climate change, tree growth can have spatial autocorrelation that can define the spatial unit of some growth pattern, and then the threshold of regional scale can be determined. Most studies have not addressed auto-correlation between independent variables to explain tree-ring growth (Biondi 2000) due to a lack of understanding of its impact during the process of regression analyses such as parameter estimation, residuals distribution, model selection and evaluation and spatial predictions (Lehmann et al. 2002). Auto-correlated factors may weaken the correspondence between plant distribution and environmental conditions (Leduc et al. 1992). An auto-correlated response variable is a problem primarily when testing explicit causal factors (Legendre 1993; Lennon 2000). In this study, the Generalized Additive Model (GAM) was used to overcome such errors and to identify the responses of tree-ring growth to environmental and climatic factors, because the GAM considers auto-correlation between explanatory variables (Bio et al. 2002; Lehmann et al. 2003).
When differentiating general regression models, the GAM does not force a parametric relationship (e.g. linear and parabolic) between responses and predictors, but implements non-parametric smoothers in regression models (Nelder and Wedderburn 1972; McCullagh and Nelder 1989). Smoothers allow the GAM to suggest a functional relationship between independent and dependent variables (Megrey et al. 2005). The GAM allows the data to determine the shape of the response curves, rather than being limited by the shapes available in a parametric class (Yee and Mitchell 1991; Vetaas 2000; Lehmann et al. 2003), so that features such as bimodality and pronounced asymmetry in the data can be easily detected. The GAM can also reduce sensitivity to outliers in the dependent variable. Therefore, the GAM has been shown to be particularly useful in various fields of research (Austin 2002b; Elith et al. 2006; Franklin 1995; Albert and Schmidt 2010; Guisan and Zimmermann 2000).
Pinus densiflora, a primary subject of this study, is considered one of the most important tree species in South Korea for its timber and cultural values. P. densiflora occupies ~23% (1,447,000 ha) of all forested area in South Korea (Korea Forest Service 2011). Quercus spp. such as Q. acutissima, Q. mongolica, Q. variabilis, Q. serrata and Q. aliena occupy ~27% (1,699,000 ha) of forested area and are recognized to have the potential to become more abundant in South Korea (Lim et al. 1995). According to the Korea Forest Service (2011), P. densiflora forests have naturally decreased by ~4% (296,200 ha) from 1996 to 2010, while Quercus and mixed-species forests have increased by 1.13% (50,716 ha) and 2.77% (154,557 ha), respectively. Kim et al. (2011) and Song et al. (2012) reported that a large decrease in coniferous forests has been observed in various regions, accompanied by a continual increase in deciduous and mixed forests. This indicates that the distribution of forest types in South Korea is changing gradually into deciduous, broad-leaved forest in conjunction with the rise in annual mean temperature. Therefore, it is necessary to model and predict changes in tree species and growth according to future climate change.
Park and Yadav (1998a, b) and Park et al. (2001) performed dendrochronological analyses using tree-rings of P. densiflora. Seo et al. (2000) analysed the heterogeneous tree-ring growth of P. densiflora in relation to topographic characteristics. Seo and Park (2010) also found a relationship between climate and tree-ring growth of Q. mongolica (Mongolian oak). Byun et al. (2010) developed a model to estimate radial growth of P. densiflora and Q. spp. However, such tree-ring analyses were not growth-based models (Park and Yadav 1998a, b; Park et al. 2001) and did not cover the whole of South Korean forests (Seo et al. 2000; Seo and Park 2010; Byun et al. 2010). In models developed for South Korea, tree growth has been explained primarily by age, density and site index as representatives of growth pattern, competition and soil and topographic condition, respectively, at the stand level (Woo et al. 2007). The influence of climatic factors such as temperature, precipitation and humidity has been little studied for South Korean forests as a whole.
In this study, we analysed the relationship between radial growth of P. densiflora and Q. spp. and topographic and climatic factors for the entire forested area of South Korea and developed radial growth models for two tree species. Based on the difference in radial growth between the present and the future, changes in potential spatial distribution of P. densiflora and Q. spp. were predicted according to the climate change scenarios described by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC 2007).
MATERIALS
Study area
The study encompassed the entirety of South Korean forest, located geographically from latitudes 33°09’–38°45’N and longitudes 124°54′–131°06′E (Fig. 1). Approximately 64% (6,368,844 ha) of South Korea is covered with forest. Evergreen needle-leaved forests (mainly P. densiflora), deciduous broad-leaved forests (mainly Q. spp.) and mixed forests occupied ~41%, 27% and 29%, respectively, of total forest area in 2010 (Korea Forest Service 2011).

location of study area and distribution of (A) P. densiflora and Q. spp. and of (B) elevation in South Korea.
National forest inventory data
The fifth National Forest Inventory (NFI) was conducted from 2006 to 2010 for all South Korean forests. The survey scheme involved systematic sampling at intervals of 4 km (latitude) × 4 km (longitude). In addition, four circular sample plots were located in one intersection of grid line by 4×4 km. Each sample plot covered 0.08 ha (16 m radius). Diameter at breast height (DBH), age, tree height and crown height were measured in all sample plots, and tree-core samples were acquired from average trees in each sample plot.
In this study, 7843 P. densiflora and 9971 Q. spp. trees were measured during 2007–2008 and were used to model radial growth of these species (Table 1). Tree-ring widths were measured in the laboratory using core samples to determine annual radial growth for 10 years (1997–2006). Using annual estimates, mean radial growth data for 1997–2006 were used to construct a standard growth (SG) model and to analyse effects of climatic and topographic factors on radial growth. The mean radial growth data for each 5-year set (1997–2001 and 2002–2006) were arranged to predict future radial growth using the SG model.
descriptive statistics of size, topographic and climatic factors in sample plots by tree species
Factors . | Variables . | P. densiflora . | Q. spp. . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mean . | min. . | max. . | Std . | mean . | min. . | max. . | Std . | |||
Age | Age (year) | 37.4 | 12.0 | 132.0 | 11.9 | 37.6 | 10.0 | 150.0 | 14.2 | |
Size | Radial Growth (mm) | 1.8 | 0.2 | 10.5 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 9.9 | 0.9 | |
DBH (cm) | 19.8 | 6.0 | 75.0 | 8.3 | 16.6 | 6.0 | 53.0 | 6.6 | ||
Height (m) | 10.8 | 2.2 | 27.3 | 3.4 | 11.2 | 1.5 | 27.6 | 3.2 | ||
Topography | Elevation (m) | 195 | 8 | 1174 | 182 | 265 | 10 | 1632 | 260 | |
Slope (°) | 25.9 | 4.0 | 68.0 | 8.4 | 27.6 | 4.0 | 65.0 | 9.0 | ||
TWI | 3.0 | 0.9 | 27.6 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 27.6 | 1.8 | ||
Climate | Temperature (°C) | 11.4 | 4.2 | 15.4 | 1.7 | 10.4 | 3.3 | 16.0 | 2.0 | |
Precipitation (mm) | 1311 | 981 | 1831 | 147 | 1296 | 981 | 1831 | 125 | ||
Humidity (%) | 66.9 | 58.8 | 76.5 | 2.7 | 67.1 | 59.1 | 78.1 | 2.4 |
Factors . | Variables . | P. densiflora . | Q. spp. . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mean . | min. . | max. . | Std . | mean . | min. . | max. . | Std . | |||
Age | Age (year) | 37.4 | 12.0 | 132.0 | 11.9 | 37.6 | 10.0 | 150.0 | 14.2 | |
Size | Radial Growth (mm) | 1.8 | 0.2 | 10.5 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 9.9 | 0.9 | |
DBH (cm) | 19.8 | 6.0 | 75.0 | 8.3 | 16.6 | 6.0 | 53.0 | 6.6 | ||
Height (m) | 10.8 | 2.2 | 27.3 | 3.4 | 11.2 | 1.5 | 27.6 | 3.2 | ||
Topography | Elevation (m) | 195 | 8 | 1174 | 182 | 265 | 10 | 1632 | 260 | |
Slope (°) | 25.9 | 4.0 | 68.0 | 8.4 | 27.6 | 4.0 | 65.0 | 9.0 | ||
TWI | 3.0 | 0.9 | 27.6 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 27.6 | 1.8 | ||
Climate | Temperature (°C) | 11.4 | 4.2 | 15.4 | 1.7 | 10.4 | 3.3 | 16.0 | 2.0 | |
Precipitation (mm) | 1311 | 981 | 1831 | 147 | 1296 | 981 | 1831 | 125 | ||
Humidity (%) | 66.9 | 58.8 | 76.5 | 2.7 | 67.1 | 59.1 | 78.1 | 2.4 |
descriptive statistics of size, topographic and climatic factors in sample plots by tree species
Factors . | Variables . | P. densiflora . | Q. spp. . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mean . | min. . | max. . | Std . | mean . | min. . | max. . | Std . | |||
Age | Age (year) | 37.4 | 12.0 | 132.0 | 11.9 | 37.6 | 10.0 | 150.0 | 14.2 | |
Size | Radial Growth (mm) | 1.8 | 0.2 | 10.5 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 9.9 | 0.9 | |
DBH (cm) | 19.8 | 6.0 | 75.0 | 8.3 | 16.6 | 6.0 | 53.0 | 6.6 | ||
Height (m) | 10.8 | 2.2 | 27.3 | 3.4 | 11.2 | 1.5 | 27.6 | 3.2 | ||
Topography | Elevation (m) | 195 | 8 | 1174 | 182 | 265 | 10 | 1632 | 260 | |
Slope (°) | 25.9 | 4.0 | 68.0 | 8.4 | 27.6 | 4.0 | 65.0 | 9.0 | ||
TWI | 3.0 | 0.9 | 27.6 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 27.6 | 1.8 | ||
Climate | Temperature (°C) | 11.4 | 4.2 | 15.4 | 1.7 | 10.4 | 3.3 | 16.0 | 2.0 | |
Precipitation (mm) | 1311 | 981 | 1831 | 147 | 1296 | 981 | 1831 | 125 | ||
Humidity (%) | 66.9 | 58.8 | 76.5 | 2.7 | 67.1 | 59.1 | 78.1 | 2.4 |
Factors . | Variables . | P. densiflora . | Q. spp. . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mean . | min. . | max. . | Std . | mean . | min. . | max. . | Std . | |||
Age | Age (year) | 37.4 | 12.0 | 132.0 | 11.9 | 37.6 | 10.0 | 150.0 | 14.2 | |
Size | Radial Growth (mm) | 1.8 | 0.2 | 10.5 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 9.9 | 0.9 | |
DBH (cm) | 19.8 | 6.0 | 75.0 | 8.3 | 16.6 | 6.0 | 53.0 | 6.6 | ||
Height (m) | 10.8 | 2.2 | 27.3 | 3.4 | 11.2 | 1.5 | 27.6 | 3.2 | ||
Topography | Elevation (m) | 195 | 8 | 1174 | 182 | 265 | 10 | 1632 | 260 | |
Slope (°) | 25.9 | 4.0 | 68.0 | 8.4 | 27.6 | 4.0 | 65.0 | 9.0 | ||
TWI | 3.0 | 0.9 | 27.6 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 27.6 | 1.8 | ||
Climate | Temperature (°C) | 11.4 | 4.2 | 15.4 | 1.7 | 10.4 | 3.3 | 16.0 | 2.0 | |
Precipitation (mm) | 1311 | 981 | 1831 | 147 | 1296 | 981 | 1831 | 125 | ||
Humidity (%) | 66.9 | 58.8 | 76.5 | 2.7 | 67.1 | 59.1 | 78.1 | 2.4 |
METHODS
Data preparation for radial growth model
The growth of individual trees can be expressed by the increment of diameter (West 1980; Pukkala 1989; Wykoff 1990; Lee 1996; Lee et al. 1999; Sterba et al. 2002). In the field of forest management, stand age, site productivity and density are generally considered to be essential factors affecting forest growth (Ryan et al. 2008; Monserud and Sterba 1996; Noh et al. 2013), as statistical and biological relationships between these parameters are obvious (Woo et al. 2007). We considered topographic and climatic factors in addition to tree age and size to explain annual radial growth over 10 years (Equation 1)

Tree age is an important variable in radial growth because tree growth depends primarily on tree or stand age (Woo et al. 2007). Tree age can be estimated by adding five years to the number of tree-rings measured at breast height in Equation 1 (Korea Forest Research Institute 2007). Tree size can be described by DBH, tree height and crown depth (Lee et al. 2004). DBH is a general factor for the explanation of tree growth (Brienen et al. 2006; Lee et al. 2003; Trasobares et al. 2004). Therefore, we also employed DBH as a second explanatory variable for radial growth.
As a third variable, we applied the Topographic Wetness Index (TWI)—a factor that indicates the concentration of water flow for a given site according to the spatial distribution of soil moisture as determined by aspect, elevation and slope (Lee and Lee 2000). The TWI indicates where water concentrates, under the assumption of equal soil permeability regardless of environmental conditions. A high TWI value indicates that an area contains a large volume of water (Moore et al. 1991); a low TWI value indicates the opposite. The TWI has been frequently used in the field of topographic and spatial analysis (Hengl et al. 2009; Kim et al. 2009; Sherman et al. 2005). In this study, the TWI was extracted using a Digital Elevation Model with a 30-m grid size provided by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs of Korea.
Climatic factors such as temperature, precipitation and humidity influence radial growth of trees (Biondi 2000; Climent et al. 2002; Savva et al. 2010; Seo and Park 2010; Shin 2006, Shen et al. 2013); hence these factors were included as explanatory variables of radial growth, with the exception of humidity, which was excluded due to poor statistical performance in our analysis. The Korean Meteorological Administration provided climatic data obtained from 75 weather stations for 1998–2007. These data were interpolated with a 0.01° grid size (approximately 1 km) using Kriging and Inverse Distance Squared Weighting, considering absolute temperature and precipitation lapse rate by altitude (Cho and Jeong 2006; Lee et al. 2007a; Lull and Ellison 1950; Park and Jang 2008; Smith 2007; Yun et al. 2001). Climatic data were prepared as mean annual data for 10 years (1998–2007) to identify the relationship between climate and radial growth. The A1B scenario described by the IPCC (2007) was used to predict future changes in forest type due to climate change. Future climatic data were predicted using the Fifth-Generation NCAR/Penn State Mesoscale Model (MM5) coupled with ECHO-G under the A1B scenario (Special Report on Emission Scenario of IPCC) by the National Institute of Meteorological Research, with a 0.2432° grid size (approximately 27 km) (Choi et al. 2011). These datasets were resampled to a 0.01° spatial resolution in the WGS-84 coordination system. The descriptive statistics for growth, topographic and climatic factors are shown in Table 1.
Standard growth
Definition of SG
Assuming that annual radial growth depends primarily on tree age, we employed the power function to predict radial growth of two tree species (Equation 2). The power functions are justified by theories of plant science: many structural and functional variables scale as power functions of measures such as body mass, length, diameter, area and volume (West et al. 1999; Enquist 2002).

Where Δr is annual radial growth (mm), and a and b are coefficients of regression models. Coefficients a and b were estimated by non-linear regression analysis using SAS v. 9.2 Program. To eliminate the influence of age on radial growth, we standardized radial growth with a fixed age. SG was defined as the radial growth at age 30 (Equation 3) (Byun et al. 2010):

For converting growth across a range of tree ages into SG at 30 years, the transformation to algebraic differences form was applied by integrating Equations 2 and 3 as shown in Equation 4 (Bailey et al. 1974; Jordan et al. 2006; Bravo-Oviedo et al. 2008). SG eliminates the influence of age on tree growth while still incorporating impacts of competition, site quality and climate into Δr.

The use of SG makes it possible for individual trees to be compared under the same conditions. That is, the relationship between annual radial growth and climate and topography can be analysed quantitatively without considering age. When differences in tree growth due to climate change exist at the regional level, SG can have spatial autocorrelation, which defines the spatial unit of a growth pattern (Lee et al. 2006). The variogram is a general form for plotting the spatial autocorrelation of data (Lichstein et al. 2002; Dirnbock and Dullinger 2004; Bahn et al. 2008). Spatial autocorrelation can be parameterized as range, nugget and sill values in a variogram. We estimated such spatial parameters in SG data, in which spatial autocorrelation was included, using the SPATIAL STATS sub-module in the S-PLUS Program (Kaluzny et al. 1998; Kirilenko and Solomon 1998).
Estimation of SG
Both biological rules and statistical performance should be carefully considered in evaluating the relationship between tree growth and explanatory factors (Byun et al. 1996; Kramer 1988). Therefore, we analysed the relationship between SG and climate and topographic factors using the GAM. The GAM is a non-parametric extension of the generalized linear model (GLM) that has been increasingly used in ecological studies (Guisan et al. 2002; Hastie and Tibshirani 1990). While the GLM emphasizes estimation of coefficients for model parameters, the GAM focuses on exploring data non-parametrically (Hastie and Tibshirani 1990; Guisan et al. 2002). The strength of the GAM is its ability to deal with highly non-linear and non-monotonic relationships between independent and explanatory variables. GAMs are especially useful for modelling species distributions (Austin 2002a; Elith et al. 2006) because the smoothing functions, which have non-parametric characteristics, can describe complicated non-linear relationships found in ecosystems (Guisan and Zimmermann 2000). Lehmann (1998) introduced the GAM as a powerful tool for describing species response curves in relation to environmental gradients, enabling prediction of species distributions under changing environmental conditions. Based on such studies, we used the GAM to predict the relationship between estimated SG (eSG) in tree level and TWI, temperature (T) and precipitation (P) (Equation 5):

For fitting GAM, we used dataset within Warmth Index (WI) range in South Korea in order to ensure the changing tendency of growth to temperature change. WI can be used for a representative index of TEM because WI is the annual sum of positive differences between TEM and 5°C (Kira 1945).
Integration of radial growth with SG
Radial growth at age i () can be estimated from radial growth at age i-5 (
), age i (agei) and age i−5 (agei−5) by equation 6—a transformation of Equation 2 to an algebraic differences form. Using Equation 6, it is possible to estimate radial growth based on the previous growth status of the target tree:

However, radial growth is influenced by topographic and climatic factors (Biondi 2000; Climent et al. 2002; Savva et al. 2010; Seo and Park 2010; Shin 2006). Therefore, eSG was added to the radial growth model to integrate these factors. The eSG can be normalized with mean estimated SG (meSG), and this value was added to the radial growth model as Equation 7. From integrating the normalized SG with the radial growth model, we could estimate the radial growth for which variations due to topographic and climatic conditions decreased.

Sensitivity analysis
Sensitivity analysis was performed to compare changes in forest type according to differences in present and future growth using SG of P. densiflora and Q. spp. Sensitivity to climate change is defined as the changing frequency of vegetation types in a grid area (Choi et al. 2011). For instance, the vegetation type in a certain area is likely to change if it is not suited to the new climate conditions (Yu et al. 2006; Lee et al. 2007b; Choi et al. 2011). Therefore, a high frequency indicates a high sensitivity, and low frequency indicates low sensitivity.
Based on these definitions of sensitivity of vegetation types to change, the eSG model was used to evaluate sensitivity of SG when comparing present and future growth according to climate change. The sensitivity of each species was calculated by subtracting current eSG (eSGpresent) from future eSG (eSGfuture) simulated under climatic conditions of the A1B scenario (Equation 8). A negative value for the future growth decrement indicates high sensitivity, whereas a positive value for the future growth increment represents low sensitivity. In addition, inter-species sensitivity—the difference in eSG between P. densiflora and Q. spp.—was calculated using Equation 9. A negative value means that P. densiflora forest may change into Q. spp. forest because the growth of Q. spp. surpasses that of P. densiflora. However, a positive sensitivity value implies that P. densiflora forest cannot be changed into a Q. spp. forest because the growth of P. densiflora still predominates that of Q. spp.:


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Estimation of SG
The coefficients for Equation 1 were estimated as shown in Table 2. All coefficients were statistically significant. The coefficient of determination (R2) suggested that approximately 20% of growth variability could be explained by age alone for both tree species. This attributed the fact that the radial growth model identifies growth pattern with age and does not consider other growth factors. The estimated coefficients were used to predict radial and SG of P. densiflora and Q. spp. at the individual tree level.
Species . | Coefficients . | Std Error . | t-value . | Prob>![]() | Pseudo R2 . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P. densiflora | a | 7.0308 | 0.4899 | 14.3515 | <0.0001 | 0.21 |
b | −0.3735 | 0.0198 | −18.8636 | <0.0001 | ||
Q. spp. | a | 9.1102 | 0.4485 | 20.3126 | <0.0001 | 0.19 |
b | −0.4497 | 0.0142 | −31.6690 | <0.0001 |
Species . | Coefficients . | Std Error . | t-value . | Prob>![]() | Pseudo R2 . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P. densiflora | a | 7.0308 | 0.4899 | 14.3515 | <0.0001 | 0.21 |
b | −0.3735 | 0.0198 | −18.8636 | <0.0001 | ||
Q. spp. | a | 9.1102 | 0.4485 | 20.3126 | <0.0001 | 0.19 |
b | −0.4497 | 0.0142 | −31.6690 | <0.0001 |
Species . | Coefficients . | Std Error . | t-value . | Prob>![]() | Pseudo R2 . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P. densiflora | a | 7.0308 | 0.4899 | 14.3515 | <0.0001 | 0.21 |
b | −0.3735 | 0.0198 | −18.8636 | <0.0001 | ||
Q. spp. | a | 9.1102 | 0.4485 | 20.3126 | <0.0001 | 0.19 |
b | −0.4497 | 0.0142 | −31.6690 | <0.0001 |
Species . | Coefficients . | Std Error . | t-value . | Prob>![]() | Pseudo R2 . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P. densiflora | a | 7.0308 | 0.4899 | 14.3515 | <0.0001 | 0.21 |
b | −0.3735 | 0.0198 | −18.8636 | <0.0001 | ||
Q. spp. | a | 9.1102 | 0.4485 | 20.3126 | <0.0001 | 0.19 |
b | −0.4497 | 0.0142 | −31.6690 | <0.0001 |
Spatial autocorrelation
Fig. 2 shows the variograms of SG for P. densiflora and Q. spp. In ranges of ~40 km, P. densiflora and Q. spp. showed spatial autocorrelation. This meant that each species could exhibit variation in radial growth due to climatic factors within a 40-km range. Therefore, SG could be explained by regional variables such as topography and climate.

variogram with standard deviation of standard growth for (A) P. densiflora and (B) Q. spp.
SG with GAM
Table 3 explains the statistical performance of the GAM analysis for the relationship between SG and TWI, temperature and precipitation. The GAM model showed relatively good statistical performance in terms of the significance level of the coefficients. The coefficient of temperature for P. densiflora is negative and that for Q. spp. is positive. The negative and positive coefficients for TEM at P. densiflora and Q. spp., respectively, can be explained by the distribution of SG for them in terms of WI in South Korea (Fig. 3). In Fig. 3a, SG according to WI increment begins to decreases in the range >85°C of WI for P. densiflora when all dataset used to develop GAM. Moreover, the area >85°C of WI is approximately 78% when seeing the distribution area of WI in the whole of South Korea. Therefore, the coefficient of TEM for P. densiflora must be negative, since most of P. densiflora are distributed in the area where their SG decreases from 85°C of WI in both the present and future. Therefore, we used temperature data only >85°C of WI for fitting GAM, so that the coefficient for TEM could be estimated significantly for P. densiflora. In the case of Q. spp, SG increases in the total WI range of both the present and future (Fig. 3a) when compared with P. densiflora. Therefore, the coefficient for TEM of Q. spp. must be always positive.
Tree species . | Parameter . | Estimate . | Std Error . | t-value . | Pr > ![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P. densiflora | Intercept | 1.79708 | 0.12106 | 14.85 | <0.0001 |
TWI | 0.02079 | 0.00614 | 3.39 | 0.0007 | |
TEM | −0.03761 | 0.01139 | −3.30 | 0.0010 | |
PRE | 0.00047329 | 0.00009496 | 4.98 | <0.0001 | |
Q. spp. | Intercept | 1.36310 | 0.09965 | 13.68 | <0.0001 |
TWI | 0.01529 | 0.00544 | 2.81 | 0.0050 | |
TEM | 0.02314 | 0.00513 | 4.51 | <0.0001 | |
PRE | 0.00025474 | 0.00008395 | 3.03 | 0.0024 |
Tree species . | Parameter . | Estimate . | Std Error . | t-value . | Pr > ![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P. densiflora | Intercept | 1.79708 | 0.12106 | 14.85 | <0.0001 |
TWI | 0.02079 | 0.00614 | 3.39 | 0.0007 | |
TEM | −0.03761 | 0.01139 | −3.30 | 0.0010 | |
PRE | 0.00047329 | 0.00009496 | 4.98 | <0.0001 | |
Q. spp. | Intercept | 1.36310 | 0.09965 | 13.68 | <0.0001 |
TWI | 0.01529 | 0.00544 | 2.81 | 0.0050 | |
TEM | 0.02314 | 0.00513 | 4.51 | <0.0001 | |
PRE | 0.00025474 | 0.00008395 | 3.03 | 0.0024 |
Tree species . | Parameter . | Estimate . | Std Error . | t-value . | Pr > ![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P. densiflora | Intercept | 1.79708 | 0.12106 | 14.85 | <0.0001 |
TWI | 0.02079 | 0.00614 | 3.39 | 0.0007 | |
TEM | −0.03761 | 0.01139 | −3.30 | 0.0010 | |
PRE | 0.00047329 | 0.00009496 | 4.98 | <0.0001 | |
Q. spp. | Intercept | 1.36310 | 0.09965 | 13.68 | <0.0001 |
TWI | 0.01529 | 0.00544 | 2.81 | 0.0050 | |
TEM | 0.02314 | 0.00513 | 4.51 | <0.0001 | |
PRE | 0.00025474 | 0.00008395 | 3.03 | 0.0024 |
Tree species . | Parameter . | Estimate . | Std Error . | t-value . | Pr > ![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P. densiflora | Intercept | 1.79708 | 0.12106 | 14.85 | <0.0001 |
TWI | 0.02079 | 0.00614 | 3.39 | 0.0007 | |
TEM | −0.03761 | 0.01139 | −3.30 | 0.0010 | |
PRE | 0.00047329 | 0.00009496 | 4.98 | <0.0001 | |
Q. spp. | Intercept | 1.36310 | 0.09965 | 13.68 | <0.0001 |
TWI | 0.01529 | 0.00544 | 2.81 | 0.0050 | |
TEM | 0.02314 | 0.00513 | 4.51 | <0.0001 | |
PRE | 0.00025474 | 0.00008395 | 3.03 | 0.0024 |

(A) distribution of SG according to WI and of WI range in the present (1997–2006) and future (2047–2056) for P. densiflora and Q. spp. and (B) the WI range for P. densiflora and Q. spp. in the present.
Results of GAM analysis implied that growth of both tree species was positively affected by precipitation. This result is similar to findings of previous studies (Lee et al. 2009; Shin 2006; Tessier et al. 1995). On the other hand, the temperature increment had a negative effect on growth of P. densiflora and a positive effect on growth of Q. spp. This is attributed to the fact that high temperatures with low precipitation would induce water stress that would limit radial growth in P. densiflora (Lee et al. 2009).
According to the distribution of eSG (Fig. 4), TWI, temperature and precipitation could not fully explain SG. In general, the radial growth of individual trees is affected by age, DBH and height, tree density and site quality (Fritts 1976; Tappeiner et al. 1997). In this study, radial growth was also affected by age, density and site quality. This is attributed to the fact that Δr in Equation 4 already included the influence of tree density and site quality when estimated with the previous year’s growth. On the other hand, climatic factors used in this study explained annual variation in estimated standard radial growth under the same conditions of tree age, size, density and site quality. This approach is considered efficacious for analysing the impact of climatic and topographic factors on tree growth under a given set of conditions. However, this study is limited in that the number of independent variables to explain tree growth is too small. Therefore, future studies that incorporate more variables are required to improve model accuracy in explaining tree growth.

Integration of radial growth with SG
By using the eSG, the meSG and radial growth during the past five years could be estimated with good statistical performance (Table 4). When the accuracies were compared, the model that included climatic factors showed better performance than the growth model that excluded climatic factors. Therefore, the radial growth model developed with climatic parameters can be used to explain growth under a given climate. When the accuracy assessment was performed, there was no significant difference between the growth models. However, the lack of significant differences according to precipitation, temperature and TWI indicates that non-climatic parameters such as size, density, competition and site quality influence forest growth.
Species . | ![]() | ![]() | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RMSE . | R2 . | RMSE . | R2 . | |
P. densiflora | 0.9782 | 0.61 | 0.9317 | 0.69 |
Q. spp | 1.0623 | 0.54 | 1.0442 | 0.57 |
Species . | ![]() | ![]() | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RMSE . | R2 . | RMSE . | R2 . | |
P. densiflora | 0.9782 | 0.61 | 0.9317 | 0.69 |
Q. spp | 1.0623 | 0.54 | 1.0442 | 0.57 |
Species . | ![]() | ![]() | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RMSE . | R2 . | RMSE . | R2 . | |
P. densiflora | 0.9782 | 0.61 | 0.9317 | 0.69 |
Q. spp | 1.0623 | 0.54 | 1.0442 | 0.57 |
Species . | ![]() | ![]() | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RMSE . | R2 . | RMSE . | R2 . | |
P. densiflora | 0.9782 | 0.61 | 0.9317 | 0.69 |
Q. spp | 1.0623 | 0.54 | 1.0442 | 0.57 |
Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the radial growth model using the independent variable of age and normalized SG including TWI, temperature and precipitation can be used to estimate radial growth with annual variation in climatic conditions (Fig. 5).

clouds of observed and estimated radial growth for (A) P. densiflora and (B) Q. spp.
Sensitivity
Temperature and precipitation are predicted to increase in the future (2047–2056) under the IPCC A1B scenario. The mean temperature is predicted to change from 11.36±2.13 ºC in the present to 12.30±2.10 ºC in the future; mean annual precipitation is predicted to increase from 1164±167.73mm to 1253±135.48mm in the future. The results of the GAM analysis with eSG (Table 2) imply that radial growth of P. densiflora would be more vulnerable to rising temperature than would that of Q. spp. Different impacts of temperature on tree growth between the two species may lead to significantly different radial growth patterns in the present and future. Therefore, we predicted change in annual radial growth of the two species with the eSG model under the A1B scenario (IPCC 2007). The model results predicted that increased precipitation would have a positive effect on radial growth whereas rising temperature would have a negative effect on growth.
According to the climate change scenario, Q. spp. is expected to have greater abundance than its present status in South Korea (Fig. 6b). Q. spp. are climax species in South Korea (Lee et al. 2007b) and are expected occupy the largest proportion of forest area in the future under a scenario of rising temperature (Choi et al. 2011). As shown in Fig. 6a, the radial growth of P. densiflora in most of South Korea, except for northern and high mountainous areas, was expected to decrease compared to its current status. Significant declines in radial growth were predicted in western coastal area and south-eastern inland areas in particular. This is attributed to a high sensitivity to reduced precipitation and increased temperature. It is therefore predicted that, due to climate change, P. densiflora will gradually lose its current habitat and diminish to northern mountainous regions in the future.

the distribution of sensitivity-species of (A) P. densiflora and (B) Q. spp. estimated by equation 8.
Fig. 7 shows the differences of eSG between P. densiflora and Q. spp. When the eSG model was simulated using current data, the growth of P. densiflora in high mountainous areas was higher than that of Q. spp. whereas the growth of Q. spp. was higher than growth of P. densiflora in low elevation areas. In Fig. 3a, SG of P. densiflora had the negative relationship to temperature, and SG of Q. spp. positive to temperature. Additionally, WI range of Q. spp. habitats is wider than that of P. densiflora in Fig. 3b. Such results support that the growth of Q. spp. can be encouraged in most area in South Korea as models by Choi et al. (2011) and Yim (1977). Therefore, the distribution of P. densiflora may be limited to high elevated area due to narrow-ranged WI, while the Q. spp. will be distributed all over low elevated area.

the distribution of sensitivity-relative in (A) the present and (B) the future estimated by equation 9.
The characteristics of radial growth in the present and future represented that the sensitivity of P. densiflora was higher than Q. spp. (Fig. 7). Therefore, P. densiflora in South Korea may be gradually replaced by Q. spp. due to the temperature rising in the future because high sensitivity accompanies the high probability of such change. Even if these results are preliminary, they suggest it would be useful to prepare adequate forest adaptation plans in response to climate change.
CONCLUSIONS
The objective of this study was to develop radial growth models for P. densiflora and Q. spp. and to predict the possibility of changes in forest type using tree-ring estimates prepared with NFI data, and future climatic data from the IPCC. We developed the standard radial growth model, for which standard radial growth is defined as radial growth at age 30, and analysed the relationship between standard radial growth and TWI, temperature and precipitation by GAM. Our results showed that rising temperature had a negative impact on the radial growth of P. densiflora and a positive influence on that of Q. spp. On the other hand, predicted increases in precipitation had a positive impact on radial growth of both tree species. Therefore, P. densiflora would be more sensitive than Q. spp. to climate change, and habitats currently occupied by P. densiflora may be gradually changed into Q. spp. forests in eastern coastal and southern parts of South Korea. P. densiflora may potentially be replaced by Q. spp. in the majority of South Korean forest, except for northern and high mountainous areas.
Quantification of the relationships between tree growth and climate has been conducted by various researchers in plant science. However, the results of these studies differ according to tree species, topography, climate and methodologies; the relationship between tree growth and climate cannot be explained by a limited number of investigations, including this study. Therefore, research on this topic should proceed employing a variety of tree species and environmental factors in other regions. Nevertheless, the findings and predictions presented in this study will be helpful for understanding the impact of climatic factors on tree growth and for predicting future changes in distribution of dominant tree species under climate change.
FUNDING
Korea Forest Service research project ‘Growth response model for major tree species using tree-ring information of national forest inventory (Project No: S120911L030130)’ and ’A3 Foresight Program (A307-K005)’ provided by National Research Foundation of Korea.
REFERENCES
Du E, Zhou Z, Li P et al. (2012) NEECF: a project of nutrient enrichment experiments in China's Forests. J Plant Ecol 6:428–35.