1-20 of 258
Availability: Open Access
Sort by
Journal Article
Keny Chatain and Philippe Schlenker
Journal of Semantics, ffaf001, https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffaf001
Published: 28 March 2025
Journal Article
Helena Aparicio and Eszter Ronai
Journal of Semantics, ffaf002, https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffaf002
Published: 27 March 2025
Image
Published: 27 March 2025
Figure 3 By-item correlation between SI rates and the likelihood of the subject noun exhibiting the stronger adjectival property.
Image
Published: 27 March 2025
Figure 4 Mean by-subject SI calculation rate (and 95% CI) from the inference task conducted as part of the degree elicitation experiment.
Image
Published: 27 March 2025
Figure 5 By-item correlation between SI rates (Experiments 4–5) and scores (Experiment 5), which index adjectival threshold distance, for biased (left) and neutral (right) subject nouns.
Image
Published: 27 March 2025
Figure 6 Distribution of degree estimates in the weak neutral condition, depending on the result of the following inference task (SI calculated v. not).
Image
Published: 27 March 2025
Figure 7 Distribution of degree estimates in the weak biased condition, depending on the result of the following inference task (SI calculated v. not)
Image
Published: 27 March 2025
Figure 1 Mean likelihood (and 95% CI) of the biased v. neutral subject exhibiting the strong adjectival property.
Image
Published: 27 March 2025
Figure 2 Mean by-subject SI calculation rate (and 95% CI) from the inference task.
Image
Published: 13 December 2024
Figure 1 Possible impacts of cognitive load and ASDs on the integration of contextual and linguistic evidence about the epistemic state of the speaker. L = Listener, S = Speaker, WSI = Weak Scalar Implicature, K = Hintikka’s “Speaker knows that” operator.
Image
Published: 13 December 2024
Figure 2 An example of a dot display used in the memorization task.
Image
Published: 13 December 2024
Figure 3 Proportion of “Yes”, “No”, and “I don’t know” responses in trials with some for the no load and load conditions where either the speaker was knowledgeable (Full Knowledge+Some trials) or ignorant (Partial Knowledge+Some trials) about the content of the third box.
Journal Article
Alan Bale and others
Journal of Semantics, ffae016, https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffae016
Published: 13 December 2024
Journal Article
Richard Zuber
Journal of Semantics, ffae018, https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffae018
Published: 28 November 2024
Journal Article
Ivan Kapitonov and Margit Bowler
Journal of Semantics, Volume 41, Issue 3-4, August-November 2024, Pages 245–277, https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffad017
Published: 26 October 2024
Image
Published: 17 October 2024
Figure 2 Mean acceptability by condition in Experiment 1. Error bars represent standard error.
Journal Article
Alexandros Kalomoiros and Florian Schwarz
Journal of Semantics, Volume 41, Issue 3-4, August-November 2024, Pages 331–372, https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffae011
Published: 17 October 2024
Image
Published: 17 October 2024
Figure 1 Mean acceptability for each condition in Mandelkern et al. (2020)
Image
Published: 17 October 2024
Figure 3 Mean Acceptability rating per condition by connective in Experiment 2. Error bars indicate standard error.
Journal Article
Journal of Semantics, Volume 41, Issue 3-4, August-November 2024, Page 411, https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffae014
Published: 11 September 2024