-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Brett McCarty, Diagnosis and Therapy in The Anticipatory Corpse: A Second Opinion, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Volume 41, Issue 6, 1 December 2016, Pages 621–641, https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhw026
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
In The Anticipatory Corpse, Jeffrey Bishop claims that modern medicine has lost formal and final causality as the dead body has become epistemologically normative, and that a singular focus on efficient and material causality has thoroughly distorted modern medical practice. Bishop implies that the renewal of medicine will require its housing in alternate social spaces. This essay critiques both Bishop’s diagnosis and therapy by arguing, first, that alternate social imaginaries, though perhaps marginalized, are already present within the practice of medicine. And second, the essay argues that alternate social imaginaries in medicine can be reclaimed not through separatist communities but in the re-narration of conceptually underdetermined practices. Given Bishop’s invitation for theology to engage medicine, this essay then draws from theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer for the kind of diagnosis and therapy currently needed, concluding with a contemporary example of how an alternate social imaginary is being instantiated in modern medicine.