-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
William Werpehowski, Persons, Practices, and the Conception Argument, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Volume 22, Issue 5, October 1997, Pages 479–494, https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/22.5.479
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
The argument that human life should be fully protected once conception is complete has been challenged by the claim that at that time such life is not genuinely individuated in the morally required sense. This essay analyzes the “conception versus individuation” exchange and directs attention to the communal contexts within which the relevant arguments and counter-arguments arise.
This content is only available as a PDF.
© 1997 by The Society for Health and Human Values
Issue Section:
Articles
You do not currently have access to this article.