Abstract

The interpretation of serum procalcitonin (PCT) levels in septic patients is facilitated by reviewing the known stimuli that activate the PCT family of genes. Herein we describe 7 pathways that, alone or in combination, can increase serum PCT levels. As a marker of activation of innate immunity, high PCT levels affect clinical diagnosis, can be trended as a measure of “source” control, and can guide duration of antibacterial therapy in septic patients. Low PCT levels reflect little to no activation of an innate immune response, influence the differential diagnosis, and support the discontinuation of empiric antibiotic therapy. Understanding the pathways that result in elevated serum PCT levels is necessary for interpretation and subsequent clinical management.

Procalcitonin (PCT) was first reported as a precursor of calcitonin in 1975 [1]. In 1991, PCT production by medullary carcinoma of the thyroid was described [2]. Elevated PCT levels in burn patients with pneumonia was reported in 1992 [3]. The first article to suggest that PCT levels might discriminate viral from bacterial infection was published in 1993 [4].

PCT elevation after endotoxin injection in human volunteers was reported in 1994 [5], and elevation of PCT due to disseminated candidiasis in a 4-year-old in 1995 [6]. Also in 1995, it was reported that PCT levels varied with the severity of illness in 43 patients with melioidosis [7]. In 1996, there were 4 relevant publications, the first reporting that sequential PCT levels can guide resolution of pneumonia and, hence, treatment duration [8] and the second that immunosuppression did not prevent increases in PCT in septic patients [9]. The third report concerned a prospective study of 337 adults who were admitted with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. In patients with microbiologically documented infection, PCT levels were >0.5 ng/mL, and negative predictive values were very high at lower PCT levels [10]. Finally, in the fourth study, PCT was used successfully as a marker of bacterial infections [11].

Since 1996, the role of PCT levels in patient management has progressively increased. There are now more than 6300 PCT literature citations. The role of PCT in management of intensive care unit patients was summarized in 2017 [12]. The current article describes the recognized pathways to an elevated PCT to facilitate interpretation of both elevated and nonelevated levels.

PCT BIOLOGY

Procalcitonin is the 116 amino acid precursor protein for the 32 amino acid calcium regulating hormone calcitonin. Calcitonin is produced by the thyroid gland C cells in response to elevation in serum calcium concentrations. In contrast, the gene for PCT is found in virtually all human cells and, in the absence of proper stimulus, PCT is constitutively produced at very low levels [13, 14]. In a hamster model of Escherichia coli peritonitis, 2–100-fold increases in PCT messenger RNA occurred rapidly in every major organ, tissue, and cell type [15]. Subsequently, when low doses of lipopolysaccharide (LPS; endotoxin) were infused into human volunteers, there was a 50-800-fold increase in PCT levels within 4–6 hours, and levels peaked after 24 hours [5]. The volunteers also demonstrated concomitant increases in proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor [TNF] and interleukin 6 [IL-6]) and the anti-inflammatory interleukin 10 (IL-10) [5].

In distinction to stimulation by bacteria or bacterial LPS, exposure of tissue or organs to only respiratory viruses does not activate PCT genes [13]. In a seminal in vitro experiment, fat cells were shown to produce PCT when incubated with proinflammatory interleukin 1β; interleukin 1 (IL-1)–stimulated PCT production was totally blocked by the presence of interferon (IFN) γ [16, 17]. Hence, PCT blockade by IFN-γ is believed to be the biologic basis of the ability of PCT levels to discriminate viral from bacterial respiratory tract infections.

The ability of PCT levels to distinguish bacterial from viral infection has been clinically confirmed in studies of patients with bacterial versus viral meningitis, virus-only influenza, and other viral respiratory tract infections [18–25]. Of note, bacterial superinfections of viral lower airway infections overcome (trump) IFN- γ suppression of PCT production. Extracellular bacteria can increase PCT levels by either of 2 pathways: (1) direct exposure of patient tissue to bacterial cell wall constituents in the absence of proinflammatory cytokines or (2) host cell exposure and response to the proinflammatory cytokines produced by phagocytic cells [26].

PCT genes are not activated by intracellular cell wall–deficient bacteria (eg, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae [19]). A summary of microorganisms that do, or do not, increase serum PCT levels is provided in the 2017 review article [12, table 4].

The magnitude of the PCT response to extracelluar bacteria varies. The response to host invasion by gram-negative bacteria is greater than the response to invasion by gram-positive cocci [27, 28]. The mechanism of this difference may be greater concomitant production of IFN- γ in response to gram-positive bacteria [29, 30]. Toxic shock syndrome toxins and clostridial species toxins increase proinflammatory cytokines that, in turn, stimulate production of PCT. Active infections due to rickettsiae, spirochetes, mycobacteria, fungi, or protozoan pathogens vary in their stimulation of PCT [12].

PCT serum levels differ from C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in several ways. CRP levels increase in response to both viral and bacterial infections. CRP levels are suppressed by glucocorticoids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, and PCT responses are not suppressed. CRP levels rise in most rheumatologic diseases. In contrast, PCT levels remain low in gout, pseudogout, rheumatoid arthritis, polyarteritis nodosa, and temporal arteritis [31, 32].

IS ELEVATED PCT GOOD OR BAD?

There is no definitive answer. There is no response to giving normal volunteers intravenous PCT. PCT neutralizes LPS in vitro. In vitro, PC increases the production of proinflammatory cytokines by leukocytes [26]. In contrast, in animal models of peritonitis, exogenous PCT versus placebo increased mortality rates in the PCT-dosed animals. In separate experiments, PCT antisera reduced mortality rates in the animals with peritonitis. In sum, the data support the concept that PCT amplifies the acute innate immune inflammatory response to bacterial invasion [26].

INTERPRETING ELEVATED SERUM PCT LEVELS IN PATIENTS IN SHOCK

Invasion of the host by bacteria and other microbes directly activates PCT transcription in virtually all organs and tissue [15]. Furthermore, contact of the invader with phagocytic cells results in release of proinflammatory cytokines that amplify the stimulus for elevating PCT serum levels.

Elevated PCT levels are documented in patients with all varieties of shock syndromes: cardiogenic shock [33], anaphylactic shock [34], distributive shock (eg, bacteremia), mushroom poisoning [35], and posttraumatic crush injury with rhabdomyolysis [36]. To interpret an elevated PCT level, it is helpful to consider the 7 potential reasons for elevation Figure 1. Two can occur in the absence of sepsis or septic shock. The others are pathways to activation of an innate immune response.

Major variables that can result in elevation of serum levels of procalcitonin (PCT). Abbreviations: CrCl, creatinine clearance; mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; PIC, proinflammatory cytokine.
Figure 1.

Major variables that can result in elevation of serum levels of procalcitonin (PCT). Abbreviations: CrCl, creatinine clearance; mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; PIC, proinflammatory cytokine.

Influence of Renal Function on Serum PCT Levels

In volunteers with normal renal function who are injected with endotoxin, PCT levels peak at 24 hours and then decline with a serum half-life that ranges from 24 to 36 hours [5]. Patients with end-stage renal disease and no evidence of infection have elevated serum PCT concentrations. The mechanism may be impaired renal clearance. Alternatively, or in addition, proinflammatory cytokines accumulate in renal failure and may stimulate PCT production [37].

In one well-controlled study, PCT levels were measured before and after hemodialysis 3 times weekly in uninfected patients [38]. The mean level (standard deviation) before dialysis was 0.23 (0.08 ± 0.90) before versus 0.12 (0.03 ± 1.41) after dialysis [38]. Hemodialysis not only removes PCT but also removes some of the proinflammatory cytokines [39].

For clinical cutoffs, it is prudent to obtain PCT levels just before starting a hemodialysis session or any time if patients are critically ill and receiving continuous venous-venous hemodialysis. In septic patients with end-stage renal disease, predialysis serum PCT levels >1 (rarely 1.5) are not due to renal insufficiency and suggest the possibility of active bacterial infection.

Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors of the C cells of the thyroid (medullary carcinoma), lung, or pancreas can secrete PCT and elevate serum PCT levels into the thousands in the absence of fever or other evidence of an inflammatory response [13, 40].

Bacteremic Shock and PCT

Microbial cell wall constituents (LPS and peptidoglycan) and/or bacterial toxins directly stimulate production of PCT by virtually all tissues, organs, and cell types. In addition, the host inflammatory response generates proinflammatory cytokines (TNF, IL-1, IL-6, and interleukin 2 and 17) that amplify the synthesis of PCT [13]. The intensity of the response varies as follows: (1) PCT levels are higher in response to infection due to gram-negative versus gram-positive bacteria [27, 28]; (2) PCT levels are higher with acute versus subacute or chronic infection (eg, chronic empyema), possibly because of the influence of IL-10 and other concomitant anti-inflammatory cytokines [41, 42]; (3) the peak PCT level varies with the severity of the infection; the PCT peak with nontransmural appendicitis is lower than that in transmural perforated appendicitis with peritonitis [43]; and (4) as described below, comorbid conditions may stimulate additional PCT production by different pathogenic pathways and can reflect multiple concomitant causes of shock (eg, septic shock plus cardiogenic shock).

Translocation of Gut Bacteria

Patients with end-stage hepatic cirrhosis are often admitted for gastrointestinal bleeding and/or encephalopathy. The patients may be afebrile but hypotensive. Assume no evidence of infected ascites and that renal function is adequate and hemoglobin levels are stable. Why is the patient hypotensive? There is mounting evidence that translocation of gut bacteria needs consideration [37, 44–46].

With cirrhosis and portal venous hypertension, gastrointestinal mucosal defense mechanisms break down, allowing enteric flora to penetrate into the submucosa, mesenteric lymph nodes and/or portal venous blood. Systemic venous blood cultures are rarely positive. Laboratory markers of gut translocation include positive tests for serum endotoxin (LPS), LPS-binding protein, soluble CD14 (commercially called presepsin), and serum PCT levels >0.25 ng/mL.

Translocation has been implicated as a cause of elevated PCT levels in patients with mesenteric ischemia [47], hemorrhagic shock [48], cardiogenic shock [33, 49], or anaphylactic shock [34]. Despite the complexities, PCT levels in septic shock patients can help management. Elevated PCT levels do not clarify whether the patient has septic shock rather than other shock syndromes. However, PCT levels <0.5 ng/mL in septic- appearing patients virtually exclude bacteremia, because as the reported negative predictive values are roughly 93% [50–53].

Secondly, sequential PCT levels reflect success, or failure, in improving the process (eg, congestive heart failure) that is driving the translocation [54–56]. Finally, sequential PCT levels can customize the duration of antibacterial therapy. The general guideline is to treat until the PCT level decreases by 80% from its peak (if known) or until the PCT level is <0.5 ng/mL, assuming reasonable renal function [57, 58].

Mitochondrial DNA

Damaged mitochondria induce an acute to subacute inflammatory response believed due to evolutionary history [59, 60]. Mitochondria evolved from saprophytic bacteria that became endosymbionts and eventually mitochondria. The DNA of mitochondria reflect their prokaryotic origin by the presence of CpG DNA repeats. When injured, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is released into the circulation. Owing to similarity to prokaryotes, the host responds with an inflammatory response to include IL-1, TNF, and other proinflammatory cytokines that stimulate the production of PCT [59].

Release of mtDNA in response to myocardial infection, mushroom poisoning with liver necrosis, pulmonary embolus with infarcted lung, trauma with rhadomyolysis, severe burns, and other sterile necrosis syndromes induces an inflammatory response with high PCT levels [61, 62]. Alternatively, invasive bacterial infections damage mitochondria and the released mtDNA induces and/or augments inflammation. Hypoxia of mitochondria can complicate all types of shock, septic and nonseptic, with a subsequently cytokine-mediated inflammatory response [63]. Studies in the critically ill report a correlation of mtDNA levels with increased mortality [63–65].

Neoplasia and Cytokine Storms

The paraneoplastic production of PCT by medullary thyroid, lung, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors was mentioned above [2, 13, 40]. In addition, select tumors (eg, some T-cell lymphomas) can produce a macrophage activation syndrome that increases PCT serum levels (also called hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis syndrome). This syndrome is typified by phagocytosis of histologic red blood cells by macrophages, highly elevated serum ferritin levels. and overproduction of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, IL-1, IL-6, and other cytokines that increase PCT serum levels [66–68].

Advances in the immunotherapy of cancer activates T cells, which in turn leads to immune-related adverse events. Both immune checkpoint inhibitor drugs and targeted chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells can attack nonneoplastic cells with stimulation of proinflammatory cytokines and associated synthesis of PCT [69, 70]. Alemtuzumab (CD20 antibody), interleukin 2, rituximab (CD20 antibody), and other immunomodulator drugs are also associated with high PCT levels [12]. In contrast, some neoplasms known for their association with fever, night sweats, and weight loss (eg, lymphoma, pancreatic cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and sarcoma) are only rarely associated with elevation of serum PCT levels.

Mixed Stimuli

Critically ill patients often have concomitant stimuli that promote transcription of the PCT genes. Consider hypotensive cirrhotic patients with severe portal hypertension, renal insufficiency, evidence of myocardial injury, and new pulmonary infiltrates. There are at least 3 or 4 pathways to an elevation of PCT, and we have limited tools to sort out the contribution of each. In contrast, if, despite comorbid conditions, hypotensive patients have PCT levels <0.05 ng/mL, there is a <5% chance of invasive bacterial infection as a cause of the low blood pressure [12].

USE OF SERUM PCT LEVELS IN SEPTIC PATIENTS

Despite the many variables that can influence serum PCT levels, PCT levels can assist in the management of patients with septic shock. PCT elevation in a patient with reasonable renal function indicates stimulation of the patient’s innate immune response [71]. The specificity for bacterial invasion depends on the clinical setting (pretest probability), the pathogen and its virulence, and host comorbid conditions. Positive predictive values are high in septic intravenous drug users and low in patients with mild lower respiratory tract infection [27, 28, 72].

The magnitude of the peak PCT level is correlates with the intensity of innate immune response (eg, progression from mild nontransmural appendicitis to perforation with peritonitis and bacteremic shock [43]). In contrast, a PCT level ≤0.25 ng/mL in a patient with hemodynamic shock strongly suggests a nonbacterial cause for the patient’s hypotension, because the negative predictive values are >90% [12, 18–25]. A “normal” PCT level is ≤0.05 ng/mL; hence, a value of 0.25 ng/mL may indicate a rising PCT ;eve;. This explains the suggestion to repeat PCT measurement after 4–6 hours before considering discontinuation of empiric antibacterial therapy. Collected case series document the safety of this approach, with the added benefit of fewer antibiotic-associated adverse events [57, 58, 73–77].

The role of PCT levels in patients with hemodynamic shock and severe community-acquired pneumonia is changing. In earlier studies, the microbial etiology of the community-acquired pneumonia was identified in <50% of patients [21–23]. Elevated PCT levels were extensively evaluated as surrogate markers of bacterial invasion. The statistical performance was modest owing to the absence of a clear reference standard and the high frequency of undetected potential pathogens [23].

Potential bacterial and viral pathogens are detected with increasing frequency using rapid molecular polymerase chain reaction diagnosis [24]. The emerging role of PCT is not as a surrogate for detection but as an assist in the adjudication of detected potential viral and bacterial pathogens [23–25].

There are 2 other interpretative roles for PCT in patients with septic shock due to proved, or clinically probable, bacterial infection. Sequential decreases in PCT levels help document ”source control” of clinical syndrome [54–56]. Second, as noted above, the duration of antibacterial therapy can be individualized by repeating measurement of PCT levels every 2–3 days. Three possible end points are suggested for cessation of antibacterial therapy: a decrease of 80% from peak PCT levels or a decrease to ≤0.05 or ≤0.25 ng/mL [54, 55, 57, 58].

AREAS FOR ADDITIONAL STUDY

Several facets of PCT are in need of additional study. First, IFN- γ suppresses PCT gene activation by proinflammatory cytokines; we need similar studies with IL-10 and other anti-inflammatory cytokines. Second, it is unclear whether chronic low level translocation of gut bacteria worsens the prognosis for survival in septic patients. Should placebo-controlled antibiotic trials be conducted in patients with evidence of chronic translocation of gut bacteria? Next, presepsin serum levels can be assessed as a marker of translocation and subsequent elevated PCT in septic patients. Finally, mtDNA levels are needed in order to compare elevated PCT levels in patients with “sterile necrosis” and no evidence of infection versus invasive bacterial infection. It is likely that future studies will combine rapid polymerase chain reaction pathogen detection panels with PCT serum levels and host gene expression dosage [78].

CONCLUSIONS

The following questions should be asked when interpreting serum PCT levels in septic patients. First, is the patient’s clinical syndrome compatible with infection by extracellular bacteria? Second, is the patient’s kidney injury severe enough (creatinine clearance <10 mL/min) to contribute to the patient’s elevated serum PCT level? Third, is the patient a candidate for translocation of gut bacteria owing to concomitant hepatic cirrhosis, stage 4 heart failure, or arterial mesenteric ischemia? If available, what is the serum presepsin level? Fourth, does the patient have enough parenchymal sterile necrosis to release mtDNA and induce an innate immune response? Fifth, if the patient has strikingly elevated PCT levels and no clinical evidence of inflammation, does he or she have a PCT-producing tumor? And, finally, has the patient received immunomodulation therapy for cancer, transplantation, or connective tissue disease that would explain the elevated serum PCT level?

Note

Supplement sponsorship. This supplement is sponsored by bioMérieux, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and Beckman Coulter.

Potential conflicts of interest. Author certifies no potential conflicts of interest. The author has submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

References

1.

Moya
F
,
Nieto
A
,
R-Candela
JL
.
Calcitonin biosynthesis: evidence for a precursor
.
Eur J Biochem
1975
;
55
:
407
13
.

2.

Born
W
,
Beglinger
C
,
Fischer
JA
.
Diagnostic relevance of the amino-terminal cleavage peptide of procalcitonin (PAS-57), calcitonin and calcitonin gene-related peptide in medullary thyroid carcinoma patients
.
Regul Pept
1991
;
32
:
311
9
.

3.

Nylen
ES
,
O’Neill
W
,
Jordan
MH
, et al.
Serum procalcitonin as an index of inhalation injury in burns
.
Horm Metab Res
1992
;
24
:
439
43
.

4.

Assicot
M
,
Gendrel
D
,
Carsin
H
,
Raymond
J
,
Guilbaud
J
,
Bohuon
C
.
High serum procalcitonin concentrations in patients with sepsis and infection
.
Lancet
1993
;
341
:
515
8
.

5.

Dandona
P
,
Nix
D
,
Wilson
MF
, et al.
Procalcitonin increase after endotoxin injection in normal subjects
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1994
;
79
:
1605
8
.

6.

Gérard
Y
,
Hober
D
,
Petitjean
S
, et al.
High serum procalcitonin level in a 4-year-old liver transplant recipient with a disseminated candidiasis
.
Infection
1995
;
23
:
310
1
.

7.

Smith
MD
,
Suputtamongkol
Y
,
Chaowagul
W
, et al.
Elevated serum procalcitonin levels in patients with melioidosis
.
Clin Infect Dis
1995
;
20
:
641
5
.

8.

Nylén
ES
,
Snider
RH
Jr
,
Thompson
KA
,
Rohatgi
P
,
Becker
KL
.
Pneumonitis-associated hyperprocalcitoninemia
.
Am J Med Sci
1996
;
312
:
12
8
.

9.

Al-Nawas
B
,
Shah
PM
.
Procalcitonin in patients with and without immunosuppression and sepsis
.
Infection
1996
;
24
:
434
6
.

10.

Al-Nawas
B
,
Krammer
I
,
Shah
PM
.
Procalcitonin in diagnosis of severe infections
.
Eur J Med Res
1996
;
1
:
331
3
.

11.

Gendrel
D
,
Assicot
M
,
Raymond
J
, et al.
Procalcitonin as a marker for the early diagnosis of neonatal infection
.
J Pediatr
1996
;
128
:
570
3
.

12.

Gilbert
DN
.
Role of procalcitonin in the management of infected patients in the intensive care unit
.
Infect Dis Clin North Am
2017
;
31
:
435
53
.

13.

Becker
KL
,
Nylén
ES
,
White
JC
,
Müller
B
,
Snider
RH
Jr
.
Clinical review 167. Procalcitonin and the calcitonin gene family of peptides in inflammation, infection, and sepsis: a journey from calcitonin back to its precursors
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2004
;
89
:
1512
25
.

14.

Becker
KL
,
Snider
R
,
Nylen
ES
.
Procalcitonin assay in systemic inflammation, infection, and sepsis: clinical utility and limitations
.
Crit Care Med
2008
;
36
:
941
52
.

15.

Muller
B
,
White
JC
,
Nylen
ES
, et al.
Ubiquitous expression of the calcitonin-1 gene in multiple tissues in response to sepsis
.
J Clin Endocinol Metab
2001
;
86
:
396
404
.

16.

Linscheid
P
,
Seboek
D
,
Nylen
ES
, et al.
In vitro and in vivo calcitonin I gene expression in parenchymal cells: a novel product of human adipose tissue
.
Endocrinology
2003
;
144
:
5578
84
.

17.

Parker
D
.
Impact of type I and III interferons on respiratory superinfections due to multidrug-resistant pathogens
.
J Infect Dis
2017
;
215
:
58
63
.

18.

Schwarz
S
,
Bertram
M
,
Schwab
S
,
Andrassy
K
,
Hacke
W
.
Serum procalcitonin levels in bacterial and abacterial meningitis
.
Crit Care Med
2000
;
28
:
1828
32
.

19.

Schützle
H
,
Forster
J
,
Superti-Furga
A
,
Berner
R
.
Is serum procalcitonin a reliable diagnostic marker in children with acute respiratory tract infections? A retrospective analysis
.
Eur J Pediatr
2009
;
168
:
1117
24
.

20.

Pfister
R
,
Kochanek
M
,
Leygeber
T
, et al.
Procalcitonin for diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia in critically ill patients during 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic: a prospective cohort study, systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis
.
Crit Care
2014
;
18
:
R44
.

21.

Jain
S
,
Self
WH
,
Wunderink
RG
, et al. ;
CDC EPIC Study Team
.
Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. adults
.
N Engl J Med
2015
;
373
:
415
27
.

22.

Stockmann
C
,
Ampofo
K
,
Killpack
J
, et al.
Procalcitonin accurately identifies hospitalized children with low risk of bacterial community-acquired pneumonia
.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc
2018
;
7
:
46
53
.

23.

Self
WH
,
Balk
RA
,
Grijalva
CG
, et al.
Procalcitonin as a marker of etiology in adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia
.
Clin Infect Dis
2017
;
65
:
183
90
.

24.

Gilbert
D
,
Gelfer
G
,
Wang
L
, et al.
The potential of molecular diagnostics and serum procalcitonin levels to change the antibiotic management of community-acquired pneumonia
.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
2016
;
86
:
102
7
.

25.

Falsey
AR
,
Becker
KL
,
Swinburne
AJ
, et al.
Bacterial complications of respiratory tract viral illness: a comprehensive evaluation
.
J Infect Dis
2013
;
208
:
432
41
.

26.

Becker
KL
,
Snider
R
,
Nylen
ES
.
Procalcitonin in sepsis and systemic inflammation. A harmful biomarker and a therapeutic target
.
Brit J Pharmacol
2010
;
59
:
253
65
.

27.

Charles
PE
,
Ladoire
S
,
Aho
S
, et al.
Serum procalcitonin elevation in critically ill patients at the onset of bacteremia caused by either gram negative or gram positive bacteria
.
BMC Infect Dis
2008
;
8
:
38
.

28.

Brodská
H
,
Malíčková
K
,
Adámková
V
,
Benáková
H
,
Šťastná
MM
,
Zima
T
.
Significantly higher procalcitonin levels could differentiate gram-negative sepsis from gram-positive and fungal sepsis
.
Clin Exp Med
2013
;
13
:
165
70
.

29.

Yamada
M
,
Gomez
JC
,
Chugh
PE
, et al.
Interferon-γ production by neutrophils during bacterial pneumonia in mice
.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2011
;
183
:
1391
401
.

30.

Gomez
JC
,
Yamada
M
,
Marti
JR
, et al.
Mechanisms of interferon gamma production by neutrophils and its function during Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia
.
Am J Respir Cell Molecular Biol
2015
;
52
:
349
64
.

31.

Hugle
T
,
Schuetz
P
,
Mueller
B
, et al.
Serum procalcitonin for discrimination between septic and non-septic arthritis
.
Clin Exp Rheumatol
2008
;
26
:
305
8
.

32.

Song
GG
,
Bae
SC
,
Lee
YH
.
Diagnostic accuracies of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for bacterial infection in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases: a meta-analysis
.
Clin Exp Rheumatol
2015
;
33
:
166
73
.

33.

Ramirez
P
,
Villarreal
E
,
Gordon
M
, et al.
Septic participation in cardiogenic shock: exposure to bacterial endotoxin
.
Shock
2017
;
47
:
588
92
.

34.

Mann
J
,
Cavallazzi
R
.
Marked serum procalcitonin level in response to isolated anaphylactic shock
.
Am J Emerg Med
2015
;
33
:
125.e5
6
.

35.

Merlet
A
,
Dauchy
FA
,
Dupon
M
.
Hyperprocalcitonemia due to mushroom poisoning
.
Clin Infect Dis
2012
;
54
:
307
8
.

36.

Hoshino
K
,
Irie
Y
,
Mizunuma
M
,
Kawano
K
,
Kitamura
T
,
Ishikura
H
.
Incidence of elevated procalcitonin and presepsin levels after severe trauma: a pilot cohort study
.
Anaesth Intensive Care
2017
;
45
:
600
4
.

37.

Choi
JJ
,
McCarthy
MW
.
Novel applications for serum procalcitonin testing in clinical practice
.
Expert Rev Mol Diagn
2018
;
18
:
27
34
.

38.

Kubo
S
,
Iwasaki
M
,
Horie
M
, et al.
Biological variation of proalcitonin levels in hemodialysis patients
.
Clin Exper Nephrol
2019
;
23
:
402
8
.

39.

Kade
G
,
Literacki
S
,
Rzeszotarska
A
,
Niemczyk
S
,
Lubas
A
.
Removal of procalcitonin and selected cytokines during continuous veno-venous hemodialysis using high cutoff hemofilters in patients with sepsis and acute kidney injury
.
Blood Purif
2018
;
46
:
153
9
.

40.

Takahashi
K
,
Ozawa
E
,
Nakao
K
,
Aoki
S
,
Takase
Y
.
Hepatobiliary and pancreatic: a procalcitonin-secreting and calcitonin-secreting pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma
.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol
2019
;
34
:
964
.

41.

Karhu
H
,
Ala-Kokk
TI
,
Vuorinen
T
, et al.
Interleukin-5, interleukin-6 interferon induced protein-10, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein among mechanically ventilated severe community-acquired viral and bacterial pneumonia patients
.
Cytokine
2019
;
13
:
272
6
.

42.

Xu
XJ
,
Luo
ZB
,
Xia
T
, et al.
Comparison of interleukin-6, interleukin-10, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in identifying high-risk febrile illness in pediatric cancer patients: a prospective observational study
.
Cytokine
2019
;
116
:
1
6
.

43.

Sand
M
,
Trullen
XV
,
Bechara
FG
, et al.
A prospective bicenter study investigating the diagnostic value of procalcitonin in patients with acute appendicitis
.
Eur Surg Res
2009
;
43
:
291
7
.

44.

Suk
KT
,
Kim
MY
,
Jeong
SW
,
Jang
JY
,
Jang
YO
,
Baik
SK
.
Impact of bacterial translocation on hepatopulmonary syndrome: a prospective observational study
.
Dig Dis Sci
2018
;
63
:
248
56
.

45.

Alukal
JJ
,
Thuluvath
PJ
.
Gastrointestinal failure in critically ill patients with cirrhosis
.
Am J Gastroenterol
2019
;
114
:
1231
7
.

46.

Ponziani
FR
,
Zocco
MA
,
Cerrito
L
,
Gasbarrini
A
,
Pompili
M
.
Bacterial translocation in patients with liver cirrhosis: physiology, clinical consequences, and practical implications
.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol
2018
;
12
:
641
56
.

47.

Stroeder
J
,
Bomberg
H
,
Wagenpfeil
S
, et al.
Presepsin and inflammatory markers correlate with occurrence and severity of nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia after cardiovascular surgery
.
Crit Care Med
2018
;
46
:
e575
83
.

48.

Zhang
J
,
Zhang
Y
,
Xu
T
, et al.
Severe traumatic hemorrhagic shock induces compromised immune barrier function of the mesenteric lymph node leading to an increase in intestinal bacterial translocation
.
Am J Transl Res
2017
;
9
:
2363
73
.

49.

Parenica
J
,
Jarkovsky
J
,
Malaska
J
, et al. ;
GREAT Network
.
Infectious complications and immune/inflammatory response in cardiogenic shock patients: a prospective observational study
.
Shock
2017
;
47
:
165
74
.

50.

Reitman
AJ
,
Pisk
RM
,
Gates
JV
3rd
,
Ozeran
JD
.
Serial procalcitonin levels to detect bacteremia in febrile neutropenia
.
Clin Pediatr (Phila)
2012
;
51
:
1175
83
.

51.

Riedel
S
,
Melendez
JH
,
An
AT
,
Rosenbaum
JE
,
Zenilman
JM
.
Procalcitonin as a marker for the detection of bacteremia and sepsis in the emergency department
.
Am J Clin Pathol
2011
;
135
:
182
9
.

52.

Mencacci
A
,
Leli
C
,
Cardaccia
A
, et al.
Procalcitonin predicts real-time PCR results in blood samples from patients with suspected sepsis
.
PLoS One
2012
;
7
:
e53279
.

53.

Menéndez
R
,
Sahuquillo-Arce
JM
,
Reyes
S
, et al.
Cytokine activation patterns and biomarkers are influenced by microorganisms in community-acquired pneumonia
.
Chest
2012
;
141
:
1537
45
.

54.

Charles
PE
,
Tinel
C
,
Barbar
S
, et al.
Procalcitonin kinetics within the first days of sepsis: relationship with the appropriateness of antibiotic therapy and the outcome
.
Crit Care
2009
;
13
:
R38
.

55.

Shehabi
Y
,
Sterba
M
,
Garrett
PM
, et al. ;
ProGUARD Study Investigators; ANZICS Clinical Trials Group
.
Procalcitonin algorithm in critically ill adults with undifferentiated infection or suspected sepsis. A randomized controlled trial
.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2014
;
190
:
1102
10
.

56.

DeJong
E
,
vanOers
JA
,
Beishinzen
A
, et al.
Efficacy and safety of procalcitonin guidance in reducing the duration of antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients: A Randomized, controlled, open-label trial
.
Lancet Infect Dis
2016
;
16
:
819
27
.

57.

Bouadma
L
,
Luyt
CE
,
Tubach
F
, et al. ;
PRORATA trial group
.
Use of procalcitonin to reduce patients’ exposure to antibiotics in intensive care units (PRORATA trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial
.
Lancet
2010
;
375
:
463
74
.

58.

Wirz
Y
,
Meier
MA
,
Bouadma
L
, et al.
Effect of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic treatment on clinical outcomes in intensive care unit patients with infection and sepsis patients: a patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials
.
Crit Care
2018
;
22
:
191
.

59.

Zhang
Q
,
Raoof
M
,
Chen
Y
, et al.
Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury
.
Nature
2010
;
464
:
104
7
.

60.

Meyer
A
,
Laverny
G
,
Bernardi
L
, et al.
Mitochondria: an organelle of bacterial origin controlling inflammation
.
Front Immunol
2018
;
9
:
536
.

61.

Grazioli
S
,
Pugin
J
.
Mitochondrial damage-associated molecular patterns: from inflammatory signaling human diseases
.
Frontiers Immunol
2018
;
9
:
article 8732, pp 1
17
.

62.

Qin
C
,
Gu
J
,
Liu
R
, et al.
Release of mitochondrial DNA correlates with peak inflammatory cytokines in patients with acute myocardial infarction
.
Anatol J Cardiol
2017
;
17
:
224
8
.

63.

Harrington
JS
,
Huh
JW
,
Schenck
EJ
,
Nakahira
K
,
Siempos
II
,
Choi
AMK
.
Circulating mitochondrial DNA as predictor of mortality in critically ill patients: a systematic review of clinical studies
.
Chest
2019
;
156
:
1120
36
.

64.

Nakahira
K
,
Kyung
SY
,
Rogers
AJ
, et al.
Circulating mitochondrial DNA in patients in the ICU as a marker of mortality: derivation and validation
.
PLoS Med
2013
;
10
:
e1001577
.

65.

Faust
HE
,
Reilly
JP
,
Anderson
BJ
, et al.
Plasma mitochondrial DNA levels are associated with ARDS in trauma and sepsis patients
.
Chest
2020
;
157
:
67
76
.

66.

Shah
M
,
Rajha
E
,
DiNardo
C
,
Muckey
E
,
Wierda
WG
,
Yeung
SJ
.
Adverse events of novel therapies for hematologic malignancies: what emergency physicians should know
.
Ann Emerg Med
2020
;
75
:
264
86
.

67.

Crayne
CB
,
Albeituni
S
,
Nichols
KE
,
Cron
RQ
.
The immunology of macrophage activation syndrome
.
Front Immunol
2019
;
10
:
119
.

68.

Denimal
D
,
Ménégaut
L
,
Rossi
C
,
Duvillard
L
,
Masson
D
.
Extreme hyperferritinemia in the setting of acute myeloid leukaemia: a case report of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
.
Biochem Med (Zagreb)
2016
;
26
:
255
9
.

69.

Fishman
JA
,
Hogan
JI
,
Maus
MV
.
Inflammatory and infectious syndromes associated with cancer immunotherapies
.
Clin Infect Dis
2019
;
69
:
909
20
.

70.

Postow
MA
,
Sidlow
R
,
Hellmann
MD
.
immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint blockade
.
N Engl J Med
2018
;
378
:
158
68
.

71.

Zhou
H
,
Guo
S
,
Lan
T
,
Ma
S
,
Zhang
F
,
Zhao
Z
.
Risk stratification and prediction value of procalcitonin and clinical severity scores for community-acquired pneumonia in ED
.
Am J Emerg Med
2018
;
36
:
2155
60
.

72.

Huang
DT
,
Yealy
DM
,
Filbin
MR
, et al.
Procalcitonin-guided use of antibiotics for lower respiratory tract infections
.
N Engl J Med
2018
;
379
:
247
9
.

73.

Pepper
DJ
,
Sun
J
,
Rhee
C
, et al.
Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic discontinuation and mortality in critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Chest
2019
;
155
:
1109
18
.

74.

Meier
MA
,
Branche
A
,
Neeser
OL
, et al.
Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic treatment in patients with positive blood cultures: a patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials
.
Clin Infect Dis
2019
;
69
:
388
96
.

75.

Iankova
I
,
Thompson-Leduc
P
,
Kirson
NY
, et al.
Efficacy and safety of procalcitonin guidance in patients with suspected or confirmed sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Crit Care Med
2018
;
46
:
691
8
.

76.

Lam
SW
,
Bauer
SR
,
Fowler
R
,
Duggal
A
.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of procalcitonin-guidance versus usual care for antimicrobial management in critically ill patients: focus on subgroups based on antibiotic initiation, cessation, or mixed strategies
.
Crit Care Med
2018
;
46
:
684
90
.

77.

Kalil
AC
,
Van Schooneveld
TC
.
Is procalcitonin-guided therapy associated with beneficial outcomes in critically ill patients with sepsis?
Crit Care Med
2018
;
46
:
811
2
.

78.

Mangioni
D
,
Peri
AM
,
Rossolini
GM
, et al.
Toward rapid sepsis diagnosis and patient stratification: what’s new from microbiology and omics science
.
J Infect Dis
2020
;
221
:
1039
47
.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)