Abstract

Background

Traditional treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) native valve endocarditis is based on cloxacillin/cefazolin monotherapy. Antibiotics with high activity against MSSA such as ceftaroline and daptomycin have been marketed last years, but there are no clinical trials evaluating them as monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with MSSA endocarditis.

Objectives

To compare the efficacy of cloxacillin, ceftaroline and daptomycin monotherapies and daptomycin combinations with beta-lactams in a rabbit model of MSSA endocarditis.

Methods

Endocarditis was induced in rabbits using two strains of MSSA. After 24h of infection, they received human-like doses of cloxacillin, ceftaroline or daptomycin or combinations of daptomycin plus either cloxacillin or ceftaroline. Isolates recovered from vegetation, spleen and kidney were retested for daptomycin non-susceptibility (DNS) post-treatment.

Results

MSSA vancomycin MIC did not influence the efficacy of any antibiotic treatment. Cloxacillin, ceftaroline and daptomycin had similar activity (25-50%) in sterilizing vegetations. However, 13% of rabbits treated with daptomycin developed DNS. The addition of daptomycin to cloxacillin or ceftaroline was synergistic and bactericidal, showing significantly more activity and higher rates of sterile vegetations (≥90%) than any monotherapy Combinations also showed better activity in spleens and kidneys compared with daptomycin monotherapy and prevented the development of DNS in all tissues. There were no differences between the two daptomycin combinations.

Conclusions

In the MSSA experimental endocarditis model, daptomycin combinations with beta-lactams had significantly better activity than either their monotherapies in sterilizing valve vegetations and preventing DNS development. These findings support their use in clinical practice and to perform clinical trials.

Information Accepted manuscripts
Accepted manuscripts are PDF versions of the author’s final manuscript, as accepted for publication by the journal but prior to copyediting or typesetting. They can be cited using the author(s), article title, journal title, year of online publication, and DOI. They will be replaced by the final typeset articles, which may therefore contain changes. The DOI will remain the same throughout.
This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)
You do not currently have access to this article.