1-20 of 6536
Sort by
Image
Published: 09 May 2025
Figure 1. Number of countries experiencing civil war, by incompatibility (1946–2022).
Image
Published: 09 May 2025
Figure 2. Prevalence of governmental incompatibilities in the world (1960–2020).
Image
Published: 09 May 2025
Figure 3. Prevalence of different claim types in governmental incompatibilities (1960–2020).
Image
Published: 09 May 2025
Figure 4. Share of countries with governmental incompatibilities by regime-type (1960–2018).
Journal Article
Peter B White and others
International Studies Quarterly, Volume 69, Issue 2, June 2025, sqaf037, https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaf037
Published: 09 May 2025
Journal Article
Zhiyuan Wang
International Studies Quarterly, Volume 69, Issue 2, June 2025, sqaf036, https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaf036
Published: 06 May 2025
Image
Published: 06 May 2025
Figure 1. Labor laws and PTAs. Note :  Figure 1 is created by performing a kernel-weighted local polynomial regression of each of three dependent variables on labor laws index. The 95 percent confidence intervals are depicted by the lightly shaded area.
Image
Published: 06 May 2025
Figure 3. Labor laws and the making of PTAs across regimes: marginal effects. Note :  Figure 3 is created based on the results in  Table 5 . Horizontal lines display the 95 percent confidence intervals. The numbers are the marginal effects.
Image
Published: 06 May 2025
Figure 2. Labor laws and the making of PTAs: marginal effects. Note :  Figure 2 is created based on the results in  Table 3 . Horizontal lines display the 95 percent confidence intervals. The numbers are the marginal effects.
Image
Published: 05 May 2025
Figure 3. (A) Total witnesses: By year and committee. (B) Proportion experts: By year and committee.
Image
Published: 05 May 2025
Figure 4. Marginal change in total witnesses per hearing: By adjusted total days and chamber polarization (NBREG).
Image
Published: 05 May 2025
Figure 5. Marginal change in expert types per hearing: Adjusted hearing days (ZIP).
Image
Published: 05 May 2025
Figure 9. Change in the number of academics or probability of an academic per hearing: By committee and casualties.
Journal Article
Daniel W Drezner and Linda L Fowler
International Studies Quarterly, Volume 69, Issue 2, June 2025, sqaf035, https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaf035
Published: 05 May 2025
Image
Published: 05 May 2025
Figure 1. Three measures of committee hearing activity, 1995–2020.
Image
Published: 05 May 2025
Figure 2. (A) Total witnesses per hearing by length of hearing. (B) Total experts per hearing by length of hearing.
Journal Article
Brian Blankenship
International Studies Quarterly, Volume 69, Issue 2, June 2025, sqaf039, https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaf039
Published: 05 May 2025
Image
Published: 05 May 2025
Figure 2. Differences in mean perceived likelihood that a country would pursue nuclear weapons across different scenarios
Image
Published: 05 May 2025
Figure 3. Pre-scenario reasons cited by respondents for why their country is not pursuing nuclear weapons
Image
Published: 05 May 2025
Figure 6. Marginal change in expert types per hearing by committee (ZIP).