Summary

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was ‘Which patient undergoing mitral valve surgery should also have the tricuspid repair?’ Altogether 390 papers were found using the reported search, of which 17 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. While a general agreement exists for tricuspid valve (TV) repair in cases of severe regurgitation and concomitant multivalvular disease requiring surgical intervention, current guidelines provide more vague indications for patients with less severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Since this condition has a lower event-free survival rate and the prognosis after symptoms development is dismal, a lower threshold and a more aggressive strategy for intervention is needed. In rheumatic valve disease, mitral valve involvement and disease spreading to TV may be responsible for further regurgitation. Although patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) may benefit from mitral valve replacement (MVR) or balloon valvotomy, many studies found that preoperative PH does not predict late TR. However, patients with high pulmonary pressure have a lower occurrence of late TR. Tricuspid annular dilation is probably the most important factor for late TR. Once established, it might be irreversible even after resolution of PH as well as absence of ‘reverse remodelling’. It has been proposed to treat TR independently from the grade of regurgitation when the annular dimension is over 21 mm/m2 or ≥3.5 cm at echo measurement or when the intra-operative tricuspid annulus (TA) diameter is >70 mm. TV repair should be accomplished in patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation (AF), since it may cause late significant TR development and affect the patient's long-term survival. The presence of a trans-tricuspid pacemaker lead is another known factor for late TR development secondary to adhesions and fibrous retraction. TV repair is probably better than replacement in non-severe organic TV disease. Annuloplasty ring repair has better outcome compared with non-ring based repair techniques; the beneficial effect is also independent of the type of mitral valve surgery performed.

1. Introduction

A best evidence topic was constructed according to a structured protocol. This is fully described in the ICVTS [1].

2. Three-part question

In [patients undergoing mitral valve surgery with moderate tricuspid regurgitation] is [Tricuspid repair] superior to [mitral surgery alone] to prevent [late tricuspid valve regurgitation]?

3. Clinical scenario

A 65-year-old woman with severe mitral valve regurgitation and atrial fibrillation (AF) is scheduled for intervention; tricuspid annulus is 40 mm with mild tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and right ventricular (RV) dilation but no increase in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). Should tricuspid valve (TV) be repaired and what further operative risk and impacts will this have on your patient's early and late outcomes?

4. Search strategy

Medline 1950 to August week 1 2009 using OVID interface:

[tricuspid regurgitation.mp. OR exp Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/] AND [mitral regurgitation.mp. OR exp Mitral Valve Insufficiency/] AND [mitral valve repair.mp. OR mitral valve replacement.mp. OR tricuspid valve repair.mp OR tricuspid valve replacement.mp. OR exp Thoracic Surgery/OR valve surgery.mp. OR exp Heart Valve Prosthesis/]

5. Search outcome

Three hundred and ninety papers were found using the reported search. From these, seventeen papers were identified that provided the best evidence to answer the question. These are presented in Table 1 .

Table 1

Best evidence papers

Author, datePatient groupOutcomesKey resultsComments
and country,
Study type
(level of evidence)
Bonow et al.,Class ISevere TR in the setting of
ACC/AHA VHDsurgery for multivalvular
Guidelines: (2008),disease should be
focused updatecorrected
(level of evidence: c)Class IITricuspid annuloplasty is
reasonable for mild TR in
patients undergoing MV surgery
when there is pulmonary
hypertension or tricuspid
annular dilatation
Vahanian et al.,Class IIaConcomitant TV repair if
(2007), EurTA diameter >40 mm
Heart J, ESC
guidelinesTV repair in patients with
symptomatic, isolated TR late
after left-sided valve surgery,
in absence of left-sided
myocardial or RV dysfunction
and without severe pulmonary
hypertension
Turina et al.,170 patientsFollow-upMean 10.6 years (1802Retrospective study
(1999),(between 1975patient-years)
Circulation,and 1989) whoSignificant TV regurgitation requiring
Switzerland, [2]underwent surgerySurgical proceduresDouble valve surgery 170surgical repair worsened the prognosis
for chronicpatients
Retrospectivecombined aorticAdvice for TV repair when hemodynamic
study (level IIb)and mitral valvularTV surgery 29 patients (17%)significant regurgitation is present
disease
CABG 7 patients (4%)
Ascending aorta surgery 7
patients (4%)
Reoperation involvingTricuspid replacement 2
TVpatients
Tricuspid reconstruction
2 patients
Survival rate inAt 10 years (cumulative survival)
patients with TR
With TV reconstruction 57%
Without TV reconstruction 68%
Predictors of lateAge (P=0.0011) LVEF
outcome(P=0.0008) Additional TV
regurgitation
(P=0.007)
Nath et al.,5223 patientsOne-year survival91.7% with no TR,Retrospective study
(2004), J Am Collundergoing90.3% with mild TR,
Cardiol, USA, [3]echocardiography;78.9% with moderate TR,Huge cohort of patients
four years follow-63.9% with severe TR
Retrospectiveup; comparisonLong follow-up
study (level IIb)survival differencesTR grade, pulmonaryModerate or greater TR
among TR gradesartery pressure andincreased mortality regardlessUnknown NYHA class at follow-up
mortalityof PASP HR 1.31 for PASP
>40 mmHg; HR 1.32 PANo data correlation with MR grade and TR
<40 mmHg
TR grade, LVEF andModerate or greater TR
mortalityincreased mortality
regardless of EF
HR 1.49 EF<50%
HR 1.54 EF>50%
Porter et al.,65 patients withFollow-up duration11.3±8 years (rangeRetrospective study
(1999), J Heartrheumatic heart1–30 years)
Valve Dis,disease who hadNo data about preoperative TR
Israel, [4]undergone MVRLeft-sided valveMV stenosis 44 patients (67%)
without TVpathology and surgicalMV regurgitation 21 patientsNo data on preoperative RV status
Retrospectivesurgeryintervention(33%)
study case seriesOutlines the late development rate of TR
(level IIIb)Mitral valve replacement in allwhen uncorrected at the time of left-sided
casesvalve surgery
Outcomes44 patients (67%) developed
late TR
Moderate 16 patients (36.4%)
Severe 18 patients (41%)
Risk factorsAge RR 1.1 female gender 1.8
Matsuyama et al.,Between MarchMean follow-up8.2±3.6 years (range 1.0–14.5Retrospective study
(2003), Ann Thor1988 andyears)
Surg, Japan, [5]September 2001 ofLong overall follow-up but high variability
174 of 274 patientsLate deaths14 late deaths (8%)of time (may underestimate late TR
Retrospectiveundergoing MVdevelopment in some early patients)
study (level IIb)surgery did notEarly postoperativeTR (3+/4+ or more) in 4
receive concomitantoutcomepatients (2%)Mitral valve repair as left-side valve
TV surgerysurgery in 53% of patients
Follow-up of TR grade28 patients developed TR grade
3+ or more (16%) 46 patientsProgression of TR over time
with preopearative TR 2+/4+,
TR had progression inEarly postoperative TR grade is unreliable
17 patients (37%)for estimation of late TR progression
Risk factors forPreoperative 2+ TR: OR 3.9No assessment of right ventricular
significant TR (3+(P=0.004) AF: OR 9.2 (P=0.03)dysfunction or tricuspid annulus dilatation
or more)left atrium size: OR 2.8
(P=0.03)Strong correlation with AF and atrial size
Recommendation for aggressive TR repair
in selected cases
Matsunaga et al.,From JanuaryTricuspid annuloplasty21 patients had preoperativeRetrospective study
(2005), Circulation,1992 to DecemberTR (moderate or greater)
USA; Japan, [6]2001, 1249 patients underwent TVRepRelatively small number of patients
consecutive(TR-group) 12 patients TR was
Retrospectivepatients with fMRignored (no-TR group)Long and complete follow-up
study (level IIb)underwent CABG
and MVRep. 21TR moderate or greater4 patients (44%) of TR group50% of patients after MVRep showed
patients (30%) hadat follow-up8 patients (67%) of no-TR groupsignificant TR at follow-up
TR before surgery(P=NS)
Presence or absence of residual MR do not
Progression of TR afterSignificant TR 25% at 1 year,affect the incidence of follow-up TR
MVRep53% at 1–3 years, 74%
over 3 yearsRevascularization and MVRep do not
reduce RV pressure overload and do not
Follow-up MR and TR14 of 21 patients (64%) withprevent late TR
significant recurrent MR had
also significant TRIncidence of late TR was independent of
whether the TR was surgically treated or
20 of 48 patients (42%) with noignored (44% vs. 67%; P=NS)
recurrent MR had significant TR
(P=NS)Significant recurrent MR (31%) reinforces
the significance of ventricular geometric
Follow-up echo dataRV systolic pressure in the TRdistortion as ongoing remodelling affecting
group was higher than the no-TRRV and LV geometries
group
LV ejection fraction was not
different between the groups
Calafiore et al.,From JanuaryFollow-up duration68 months (100% complete)Moderate-or-more fTR, if untreated, can
(2009), Ann1988 to Marchimpair both midterm survival and functional
Thorac Surg,2003, 110 patientsMortalityTreated vs. untreated TR groupstatus, even if it seems not to affect early
Italy, [7]with functional30 days: 2% vs. 8.5%outcome
mitral regurgitation(P=0.213) long-term (46/104
Retrospectiveundergoing mitralpatients) 16 patients vs.Reversal of TV remodeling cannot be
study (level IIb)valve surgery30 patientsexpected with MV surgery alone
showed moderate-
or-more functionalTRAt 12 months follow-upFunctional TR progression is not related to
TR repaired with(77 patients)functional MVR progression
De Vega technique
Treated group (42 patients)Surgical technique can then influence the
No TR: 50%late results of TR correction
TR 1+: 31%
TR 2+: 14%
TR 3+: 5%
Untreated group (35 patients)
No TR: 0%
TR 1+: 23%
TR 2+: 37%
TR 3+: 34%
TR 4+: 6%
MVR progression andMV repair (60 patients) MR
influence on fTR3+: >3 patients (5%) Late
recurrence/progressionfTR group vs. non late fTR
2/47 (4.3%) vs. 1/13 (7.7%)
P=0.625
Survival5 years – treated vs. untreated
TR 45.0±6.1% vs. 74.5±5.1%
(P=0.044)
Risk factors ofLower mid-term survival (HR 2.7)
untreated
moderate-or-more TRSurvival in NYHA class II or II
(HR 1.9)
Boyaci et al.,Sixty-eight (68)TR grade, LVEF andModerate or greaterRetrospective study
(2007),patients undergonemortalityTR increased mortality
Angiology,MVR withoutregardless of EFImprovement of functional capacity
Turkey, [8]TV surgeryHR 1.49 EF<50%in 86% of patients with mild
HR 1.54 EF>50%preop TR vs. 54% of those with
Retrospectivesignificant TR
study (level IIb)Preoperative TRMild TR (group I) 42 patients
(62%)Right ventricular pressure fell and remained
lower in patients with mild TR, but not in
Significant TR (group II) 26patients with moderate to severe TR
patients (38%)
Transmitral F-UGroup I vs. Group II (mmHg)
gradient5.2±2.5 vs. 5.6±3.0
(P=NS)
Right ventricularGroup I (mmHg) 47±1.0 to
systolic pressure31±10
trend pre-
postoperativeGroup II 45±9 to 42±12
PulmonaryGroup I vs. Group II (mmHg)
hypertension at F-U31±10 vs. 42±12
(P<0.05)
NYHA Class at F-UGroup I vs. Group II
NYHA I 19% vs. 2% (P<0.05)
NYHA II 67% vs. 46% (P<0.05)
NYHA III 14% vs. 38%
(P<0.05)
Hospitalization/yearGroup I vs. Group II 1.1±0.4
vs. 1.8±0.7
(P<0.05)
Song et al.,Between 1995 andFollow-upClinical 101±24 months (rangeRetrospective study
(2009),2000, 638 patients12–146 months)
Heart,(356 men) withExtensive number of patients
Korea, [9]mild (≤grade 2/4)Echocardiographical
TR underwent64±30 months (range 14–141Outlines the natural history of late TR
Retrospectivesurgery withoutmonths)development
studyany procedure on
(level IIb)the TVLeft-side valve surgeryMitral valve surgeryRheumatic aetiology is strongly associated
323 patientswith development of late significant TR
Aortic valve surgery 221 patientsFemale gender has higher incidence
probably due to higher prevalence of
Double-valve surgeryrheumatic disease in this population
94 patients
AF is the most striking risk factor for
Significant late TRMitral valve surgery 9.6%development of late significant TR
development(31/323 patients)
PH is not associated with TR progression
Aortic valve surgery 3.2%
(7/221 patients)Right ventricular distortion or annular
dilatation is associated with late TR
Double-valve surgery 11.7%development
(11/94 patients)
Impact of rheumaticRheumatic MR 15% (10/65
disease on late TRpatients)
Non-rheumatic MR 5% (7/133
patients)
(P=0.017)
AF239 patients (37%) before
surgery
184 patients persistent AF
18 patients (5%) developed
AF at follow-up
TV annular dilatationTV annulus increased in both
group
Late TR 32±6 to 40±7 mm
Non late TR 40±7 mm
P<0.001
Late TR risk factorsAge (HR 1.0; P=0.005)
Female gender (HR 5.0;
P=0.001) rheumatic aetiology
(HR 3.8; P=0.011) AF (HR
2.6; P=0.035) peak pressure
gradient of TR (HR 1.1; <0.001)
MortalitySignificant TR vs. non late TR
4.9% vs. 16.3%
(P=0.004)
Event-free survivalLate TR vs. non-late TR
76±6% vs. 91±1%
(P<0.001)
Colombo et al.,From JanuaryFollow-up25±15.9 months (range 3–49Prospective study
(2001), Cardiovasc1995 to Decembermonths)
Surg, Italy, [10]1998, 50 patientsAbsence or mild to moderate TR in 83.9%
with rheumaticSurgical procedureMVR with mechanical valve:of patients who underwent tricuspid
Prospectivemitral valve47 patientsprocedure
single centerdisease and
cohort studyfunctionalMVR with bioprosthesis:Undersizing of TV annulus has been
(level IIb)TR underwent3 patientseffective even with the De Vega procedure
surgery forTVRep with De Vega procedure:
MVR and TV33 patients
repair
OutcomeTVRep group with 3+ or 4+
TV repairTR Grade 0 or 1+: 19 patients
performed if(73%) Grade 1+ or 2+:
indexed TV3 patients (11.5%) Grade 2+
annular dimensionor 3+: 1 pt (3.8%) Grade 3+ to
>21 mm/m24+: 3 patients (11.5%)
Two patients of five with TV
annulus >21 mm/m2 who did
not undergo TV annuloplasty had
significant TR at follow-up
Dreyfus et al.,Between 1989 andMortalityNo significant differenceRetrospective study; consecutive patients
(2005), Ann2001, 311 patients(group 1=1.8%; group 2=0.7%)
Thorac Surg,underwent mitral10 years follow-up patients
UK, [11]valve repairActuarial survival rateGroup 1=97.3%, 96.2%, and
(MVR). Tricuspid85.5%; group 2=98.5%,Precise and reproducible method of TV
Retrospectiveannuloplasty98.5%, and 90.3% at 3, 5, andsizing is used
study (level IIb)performed if10 years, respectively
tricuspid annularDemonstrates little or no correlation
diameter ≥70 mmNYHA classImproved in group MVR+TVbetween tricuspid dilatation and
regardless of theannuloplasty (groupregurgitation
grade of1=1.59±0.84; group
regurgitation.2=1.11±0.31;Tricuspid dilatation is more reliable than
Group 1 MVRP<0.001)TR when assessing secondary TV disease
alone (163
patients; 54.4%);TR gradeIncreased >2 grades in
Group 2 MVR48% of group 1 (MVR alone)
plus tricuspidand only 2% in group 2 (MVR+
annuloplasty (148TV annuloplasty)
patients; 47.6%)
McCarthy et al.,From 1990 toFollow-up8 years (3302 patient-years)Retrospective study no consistent,
(2004), J Thorac1999, 790 patientsaccurate data for right ventricular function,
Cardiovasc Surg,underwentLeft-sided valveMVR 425 patients (54%)size and geometry, TV annular size, PAPs
USA, [12]TV annuloplastysurgery and other
for functionalproceduresMVRep 276 patients (35%)No analysis of residual MR
Cohort studyregurgitation using
(level IIb)4 techniques:AVR 199 patients (25%)No analytical correlation between TR and
1. Carpentier–survival or progression of NYHA class
Edwards semi-rigidAVRep 15 patients (2%)
ringResidual TR in 14% of patients early after
2. Cosgrove–CABG 205 patients (265)operation
Edwards flexible
bandDistribution of patientsCarpentier: 139 patientsLate worsening (beyond 6 months)
3. De Vegaaccording to TV repair(17%)associated with patient disease factors
proceduretechniqueAND with avoidable causes such as trans-
4. Peri-GuardCosgrove: 291 patients (37%)tricuspid pacing leads and type of
annuloplastyannuloplasty
De Vega: 116 patients (15%)
2 non-ring annuloplasties, De Vega and
Peri-Guard: 243 patients (31%)Peri-Guard, worsening of TR.
Reoperation rateFreedom from reoperation
1 month: 99%
8 years: 97%
Progression to gradeCarpentier 3+: 10% - 10% -
3+ or 4+ TR according11% - 11% 4+: 5.2% - 5.5% -
to TV repair technique6% - 6% (P=0.7)
1 monthCosgrove 3+: 10% - 12% -
1 year12% - NA 4+: 5.3% - 6% - 6% - NA
5 years(P=0.05)
8 years
De Vega 3+: 9% - 12% - 17% -
20% 4+: 4.6 - 6% - 11% - 13%
(P=0.002)
Peri-Guard 3+: 10% - 13% -
19% - 22% 4+: 5.4% - 7% - 13% -
15% (P=0.0009)
Pacemaker leadPreop PMK Lead vs. No PMK
influence on 3+ and 4+Lead
TR prevalence
16% - 42% vs. 15% - 23%
(1 month–5 years)
Preop TR influence of9% - 14% - 22% at 1 month
late TR development
(Prevalence of 3+ or18% - 23% - 29% at 5 years
4+)
1. grades 0 vs. 1+
2. 2+ vs. 3+
3. vs. 4+
Risk factors for late TRLV dysfunction (P=0.0002)
worseningOne-system disease (P=0.007)
AF (P=0.01) PMK lead
(P=0.04)
Tang et al.,Between 1978 andFollow-up duration5.9±4.9 years (rangeMajority of patients undergoing TV repair
(2006), Circulation,2003, 702 patients0–21 years)have secondary (‘functional’) regurgitation
Canada, [13]underwent TV
repair in the settingTR repairDe Vega procedure 493Uncorrected moderate and severe TR may
Retrospectiveof concomitantpatientspersist or even worsen after mitral valve
study (level IIb)left-sided valvesurgery
surgery and‘Ring’ annuloplasty 209 patients:
revascularizationCarpentier n. 114 (54%)Annuloplasty ring refers significant
Duran n. 52 (25%)improvement over De Vega repair in long-
Cosgrove n. 43 (21%)term survival and event-free survival, as
well as recurrence of TR
Functional classRing vs. non ring TV repair
NYHA III–IV 20% vs. 25%Beneficial effects of a TV annuloplasty
ring were independent of the type of
Late TRRing group No TR 15%mitral valve surgery performed
Trivial-to-mild TR 55%
Moderate-to-severe TR 30%Recurrence of TR was not significantly
associated with the recurrence of MR
Non-ring group No TR 10%
Trivial-to-mild TR 54%
Moderate-to-severe TR 36%
OutcomesNo ring vs. ring (15 years)
Freedom from TR 39±11% vs.
82±5% (P=0.003)
Long-term survival 36±8% vs.
49±5% (P=0.007)
Event-free survival 17±6%
vs. 34±5%
PredictorsAnnuloplasty ring
Long-term survival (HR 0.7;
P=0.03)
Event-free survival (HR 0.8;
P=0.04)
Kim et al.,From JanuaryDistribution of patientsCarpentier: 139 patients (17%)Retrospective study
(2005),1994 to Decemberaccording to TV repair
Circulation,1997, 170 patientstechniqueCosgrove: 291 patients (37%)Long follow-up
Korea, [14]underwent left-
side valve surgeryDe Vega: 116 patients (15%)Tricuspid repair techniques used are also
Retrospectiveand MAZE (Coxknown to be burden by high late TR
studyIII) operation forPeri-Guard: 243 patients (31%)recurrence
(level IIb)AF Group I 44
patients in sinusReoperation rateFreedom from reoperationAF affects the worsening of TR over time
rhythm; Group II1 month: 99%
48 patients in AF8 years: 97%MAZE can prevent this course
with MAZE and
Group III 78Preoperative TR gradeGroup I 12 patients (27.3%)Recovery and maintenance of atrial
patients withoutGroup II 8 patients (16.7%)mechanical activity are of great value for
MAZEGroup III 26 patients (33.3%)such a benefit
Progression of TR atImmediate results (significant
follow-upTR) Group I 3 patients
(6.8%) Group II 1 pt (2.1%)
Group III 11 patients (14.1%)
P=NS among groups
Post-op results (significant TR)
Group I 3/41 patients
(7.3%) Group II 6/47 pt (12.8%)
Group III 26/67 patients (38.8%)
P=0.001 Group I vs. Group III
P=0.005 Group II vs. Group III
Atrial contractilityGroup II (+MAZE) 38 patients
contribution andof Group II maintained sinus
analysisrhythm (Group IIa) 10 patients
with no LA mechanical activity
(AF, accelerated junctional
rhythm, sinus rhythm)
Group IIa had smaller
LA size preoperatively and
lower TR grade at the final
follow-up than those in Group IIb
(P=0.038; P=0.025)
Left-side valve surgeryMVR/MVRep 174 patients
(51.9%)
AV surgery alone 74 patients
(22.1%)
Combined MV+AV surgery
87 patients (4.5%) MVR/MVRep
174 patients (51.9%)
AV surgery alone 74 patients
(22.1%)
Combined MV+AV surgery
87 patients (4.5%)
TV surgery andAnnuloplasty 15 patients (4.5%)
technique
TR developmentSignificant: 90 patients (26.9%)
Severe in 25 patients (7.5%)
TR population and riskAge (47.6±13.4 vs. 44.3±13.2
factors (TR+ vs. TR-)years, P=0.04)
Preop AF (83.3 vs. 46.5%,
P<0.001)
LA dimension (56.9±13.2
vs. 52.4 ±11.5 mm, P=0.006)
Prior valve surgery (40.0 vs.
25.3%, P=0.01).
Event-free survivalTR- group
at 100, 140, 160 and97.0±1.1%
175 months87.7±2.8%
85.9±2.6%
85.9±2.6%
TR+ group
94.4±2.4%
86.2±3.7%
70.9±5.9%
62.0±9.8%
P=0.03
Jonjev et al.,From July 1994Follow-up durationMean 42 months (rangeIn end-stage heart disease and selected
(2007), J Cardto July 2004,1–120 months)patient population the RADO procedure is
Surg, Serbia and226 of 294effective
Montenegro, [16]patients whoFunctional statusPreopertative NYHA class III
underwent surgical70 patients (39.88%)Concomitant reduction of mitral and
Prospectiveintervention forNYHA class IV 126 patientstricuspid insufficiency provides early and
study (level IIb)chronic ischemic(69.02%) mean NYHA classlong-term beneficial effect, according with
mitral3.9the natural history of the disease
regurgitation
had reductiveSurgical procedureMitral valve surgeryNo data are provided about the long-term
annuloplasty ofefficacy of De Vega annuloplasty for the
double orificesCarpentier mitral ringprevention of late TR development
(RADO)37 patients (16.38%)
Semicircular posterior annuloplasty
189 patients (69.02%)
TV surgery
De Vega annuloplasty
226 patients (100%)
Follow-upMean NYHA class 1.9 mean
EF preoperative 25% to
postoperative 34%
RADO resultsMitral valve insufficiency
mean grade 3.7±0.4
preoperative to 0.7±0.3
postoperative
TV insufficiency mean grade
3.4±0.4 preoperative to
0.9±0.2 prostoperative
Survival5 years–10 years
61.5±4.0% – 38.05±8.0%
Freedom fromAt 10 years 60.0±6.7%
decompensation
De Bonis et al.,Ninety-one DCMFollow-up1.8±1.2 years (range 0.5–5.7Retrospective study
(2008), Eur Jpatients (mean ageyears)
Cardiothorac Surg,61±11.3)No consistent, accurate data were available
Italy, [17]submitted to MVLeft-sided surgeryEdge-to-edge+undersizedpreoperatively and at follow-up regarding
repair (±tricuspidand concomitantannuloplasty 46 patientsright atrial dimension, tricuspid annular size
Cohort studyrepair) forprocedures(50.5%) undersizedand degree of leaflet tethering
(level IIb)functional MRannuloplasty 45 patients (49.4%)
Small number of patients included
CABG 41 patients (45%)
uncorrected moderate or less TR in patients
AF surgery 14 patients (15.3%)with functional MR often persist and
worsen over time
TV surgical13 patients (3+/4+ or
intervention>TR) had TV annuloplasty:Annular dilatation and tethering as
underlying mechanisms of late TR
De Vega Procedure: 7 patients
Ring annuloplasty:RV function assessment is essential to
6 patientsguide the surgical intervention
No TV annuloplasty: 78 patientsAbsence of ‘reverse remodelling’ influences
(with TR<2+/4+)late TR development
Evolution of fTRAbsent/mild 52 patients (57.1%)
Moderate 28 patients (30.7%)
Moderately severe 9 patients
(9.8%)
Severe 2 patients (2.2%)
11 of 91 patients (12%) had
progression of TR
14 of the 78 patients (17.9%)
no-TR had worsening of TR at
least of 2 grades
TR evolutionAnnular dilatation in 75 patients
mechanismstethering in 6 patients
Predictors of significantRV dilatation (OR 8.3, P=0.009)
late TR
Pre-op. RV dysfunction (OR
13.7, P=0.0001)
TR grade at discharge (OR 5.4,
P=0.01)
PulmonarySignificant (>3+) TR at
hypertensionfollow-up:
37% (9/24) among the patients
with pulmonary hypertension
3% (2/67) among those with
SPAP <40 mmHg at the last
echocardiogram
(P<0.0001)
Pattern of LV‘reverse remodeling’ group:
remodelingSignificant TR in only 1 of 49
patients (2%) that demonstrated
reverse remodeling
No ‘reverse remodeling group’
significant TR in 10 of 42
patients (23.8%)
(P=0.04)
Author, datePatient groupOutcomesKey resultsComments
and country,
Study type
(level of evidence)
Bonow et al.,Class ISevere TR in the setting of
ACC/AHA VHDsurgery for multivalvular
Guidelines: (2008),disease should be
focused updatecorrected
(level of evidence: c)Class IITricuspid annuloplasty is
reasonable for mild TR in
patients undergoing MV surgery
when there is pulmonary
hypertension or tricuspid
annular dilatation
Vahanian et al.,Class IIaConcomitant TV repair if
(2007), EurTA diameter >40 mm
Heart J, ESC
guidelinesTV repair in patients with
symptomatic, isolated TR late
after left-sided valve surgery,
in absence of left-sided
myocardial or RV dysfunction
and without severe pulmonary
hypertension
Turina et al.,170 patientsFollow-upMean 10.6 years (1802Retrospective study
(1999),(between 1975patient-years)
Circulation,and 1989) whoSignificant TV regurgitation requiring
Switzerland, [2]underwent surgerySurgical proceduresDouble valve surgery 170surgical repair worsened the prognosis
for chronicpatients
Retrospectivecombined aorticAdvice for TV repair when hemodynamic
study (level IIb)and mitral valvularTV surgery 29 patients (17%)significant regurgitation is present
disease
CABG 7 patients (4%)
Ascending aorta surgery 7
patients (4%)
Reoperation involvingTricuspid replacement 2
TVpatients
Tricuspid reconstruction
2 patients
Survival rate inAt 10 years (cumulative survival)
patients with TR
With TV reconstruction 57%
Without TV reconstruction 68%
Predictors of lateAge (P=0.0011) LVEF
outcome(P=0.0008) Additional TV
regurgitation
(P=0.007)
Nath et al.,5223 patientsOne-year survival91.7% with no TR,Retrospective study
(2004), J Am Collundergoing90.3% with mild TR,
Cardiol, USA, [3]echocardiography;78.9% with moderate TR,Huge cohort of patients
four years follow-63.9% with severe TR
Retrospectiveup; comparisonLong follow-up
study (level IIb)survival differencesTR grade, pulmonaryModerate or greater TR
among TR gradesartery pressure andincreased mortality regardlessUnknown NYHA class at follow-up
mortalityof PASP HR 1.31 for PASP
>40 mmHg; HR 1.32 PANo data correlation with MR grade and TR
<40 mmHg
TR grade, LVEF andModerate or greater TR
mortalityincreased mortality
regardless of EF
HR 1.49 EF<50%
HR 1.54 EF>50%
Porter et al.,65 patients withFollow-up duration11.3±8 years (rangeRetrospective study
(1999), J Heartrheumatic heart1–30 years)
Valve Dis,disease who hadNo data about preoperative TR
Israel, [4]undergone MVRLeft-sided valveMV stenosis 44 patients (67%)
without TVpathology and surgicalMV regurgitation 21 patientsNo data on preoperative RV status
Retrospectivesurgeryintervention(33%)
study case seriesOutlines the late development rate of TR
(level IIIb)Mitral valve replacement in allwhen uncorrected at the time of left-sided
casesvalve surgery
Outcomes44 patients (67%) developed
late TR
Moderate 16 patients (36.4%)
Severe 18 patients (41%)
Risk factorsAge RR 1.1 female gender 1.8
Matsuyama et al.,Between MarchMean follow-up8.2±3.6 years (range 1.0–14.5Retrospective study
(2003), Ann Thor1988 andyears)
Surg, Japan, [5]September 2001 ofLong overall follow-up but high variability
174 of 274 patientsLate deaths14 late deaths (8%)of time (may underestimate late TR
Retrospectiveundergoing MVdevelopment in some early patients)
study (level IIb)surgery did notEarly postoperativeTR (3+/4+ or more) in 4
receive concomitantoutcomepatients (2%)Mitral valve repair as left-side valve
TV surgerysurgery in 53% of patients
Follow-up of TR grade28 patients developed TR grade
3+ or more (16%) 46 patientsProgression of TR over time
with preopearative TR 2+/4+,
TR had progression inEarly postoperative TR grade is unreliable
17 patients (37%)for estimation of late TR progression
Risk factors forPreoperative 2+ TR: OR 3.9No assessment of right ventricular
significant TR (3+(P=0.004) AF: OR 9.2 (P=0.03)dysfunction or tricuspid annulus dilatation
or more)left atrium size: OR 2.8
(P=0.03)Strong correlation with AF and atrial size
Recommendation for aggressive TR repair
in selected cases
Matsunaga et al.,From JanuaryTricuspid annuloplasty21 patients had preoperativeRetrospective study
(2005), Circulation,1992 to DecemberTR (moderate or greater)
USA; Japan, [6]2001, 1249 patients underwent TVRepRelatively small number of patients
consecutive(TR-group) 12 patients TR was
Retrospectivepatients with fMRignored (no-TR group)Long and complete follow-up
study (level IIb)underwent CABG
and MVRep. 21TR moderate or greater4 patients (44%) of TR group50% of patients after MVRep showed
patients (30%) hadat follow-up8 patients (67%) of no-TR groupsignificant TR at follow-up
TR before surgery(P=NS)
Presence or absence of residual MR do not
Progression of TR afterSignificant TR 25% at 1 year,affect the incidence of follow-up TR
MVRep53% at 1–3 years, 74%
over 3 yearsRevascularization and MVRep do not
reduce RV pressure overload and do not
Follow-up MR and TR14 of 21 patients (64%) withprevent late TR
significant recurrent MR had
also significant TRIncidence of late TR was independent of
whether the TR was surgically treated or
20 of 48 patients (42%) with noignored (44% vs. 67%; P=NS)
recurrent MR had significant TR
(P=NS)Significant recurrent MR (31%) reinforces
the significance of ventricular geometric
Follow-up echo dataRV systolic pressure in the TRdistortion as ongoing remodelling affecting
group was higher than the no-TRRV and LV geometries
group
LV ejection fraction was not
different between the groups
Calafiore et al.,From JanuaryFollow-up duration68 months (100% complete)Moderate-or-more fTR, if untreated, can
(2009), Ann1988 to Marchimpair both midterm survival and functional
Thorac Surg,2003, 110 patientsMortalityTreated vs. untreated TR groupstatus, even if it seems not to affect early
Italy, [7]with functional30 days: 2% vs. 8.5%outcome
mitral regurgitation(P=0.213) long-term (46/104
Retrospectiveundergoing mitralpatients) 16 patients vs.Reversal of TV remodeling cannot be
study (level IIb)valve surgery30 patientsexpected with MV surgery alone
showed moderate-
or-more functionalTRAt 12 months follow-upFunctional TR progression is not related to
TR repaired with(77 patients)functional MVR progression
De Vega technique
Treated group (42 patients)Surgical technique can then influence the
No TR: 50%late results of TR correction
TR 1+: 31%
TR 2+: 14%
TR 3+: 5%
Untreated group (35 patients)
No TR: 0%
TR 1+: 23%
TR 2+: 37%
TR 3+: 34%
TR 4+: 6%
MVR progression andMV repair (60 patients) MR
influence on fTR3+: >3 patients (5%) Late
recurrence/progressionfTR group vs. non late fTR
2/47 (4.3%) vs. 1/13 (7.7%)
P=0.625
Survival5 years – treated vs. untreated
TR 45.0±6.1% vs. 74.5±5.1%
(P=0.044)
Risk factors ofLower mid-term survival (HR 2.7)
untreated
moderate-or-more TRSurvival in NYHA class II or II
(HR 1.9)
Boyaci et al.,Sixty-eight (68)TR grade, LVEF andModerate or greaterRetrospective study
(2007),patients undergonemortalityTR increased mortality
Angiology,MVR withoutregardless of EFImprovement of functional capacity
Turkey, [8]TV surgeryHR 1.49 EF<50%in 86% of patients with mild
HR 1.54 EF>50%preop TR vs. 54% of those with
Retrospectivesignificant TR
study (level IIb)Preoperative TRMild TR (group I) 42 patients
(62%)Right ventricular pressure fell and remained
lower in patients with mild TR, but not in
Significant TR (group II) 26patients with moderate to severe TR
patients (38%)
Transmitral F-UGroup I vs. Group II (mmHg)
gradient5.2±2.5 vs. 5.6±3.0
(P=NS)
Right ventricularGroup I (mmHg) 47±1.0 to
systolic pressure31±10
trend pre-
postoperativeGroup II 45±9 to 42±12
PulmonaryGroup I vs. Group II (mmHg)
hypertension at F-U31±10 vs. 42±12
(P<0.05)
NYHA Class at F-UGroup I vs. Group II
NYHA I 19% vs. 2% (P<0.05)
NYHA II 67% vs. 46% (P<0.05)
NYHA III 14% vs. 38%
(P<0.05)
Hospitalization/yearGroup I vs. Group II 1.1±0.4
vs. 1.8±0.7
(P<0.05)
Song et al.,Between 1995 andFollow-upClinical 101±24 months (rangeRetrospective study
(2009),2000, 638 patients12–146 months)
Heart,(356 men) withExtensive number of patients
Korea, [9]mild (≤grade 2/4)Echocardiographical
TR underwent64±30 months (range 14–141Outlines the natural history of late TR
Retrospectivesurgery withoutmonths)development
studyany procedure on
(level IIb)the TVLeft-side valve surgeryMitral valve surgeryRheumatic aetiology is strongly associated
323 patientswith development of late significant TR
Aortic valve surgery 221 patientsFemale gender has higher incidence
probably due to higher prevalence of
Double-valve surgeryrheumatic disease in this population
94 patients
AF is the most striking risk factor for
Significant late TRMitral valve surgery 9.6%development of late significant TR
development(31/323 patients)
PH is not associated with TR progression
Aortic valve surgery 3.2%
(7/221 patients)Right ventricular distortion or annular
dilatation is associated with late TR
Double-valve surgery 11.7%development
(11/94 patients)
Impact of rheumaticRheumatic MR 15% (10/65
disease on late TRpatients)
Non-rheumatic MR 5% (7/133
patients)
(P=0.017)
AF239 patients (37%) before
surgery
184 patients persistent AF
18 patients (5%) developed
AF at follow-up
TV annular dilatationTV annulus increased in both
group
Late TR 32±6 to 40±7 mm
Non late TR 40±7 mm
P<0.001
Late TR risk factorsAge (HR 1.0; P=0.005)
Female gender (HR 5.0;
P=0.001) rheumatic aetiology
(HR 3.8; P=0.011) AF (HR
2.6; P=0.035) peak pressure
gradient of TR (HR 1.1; <0.001)
MortalitySignificant TR vs. non late TR
4.9% vs. 16.3%
(P=0.004)
Event-free survivalLate TR vs. non-late TR
76±6% vs. 91±1%
(P<0.001)
Colombo et al.,From JanuaryFollow-up25±15.9 months (range 3–49Prospective study
(2001), Cardiovasc1995 to Decembermonths)
Surg, Italy, [10]1998, 50 patientsAbsence or mild to moderate TR in 83.9%
with rheumaticSurgical procedureMVR with mechanical valve:of patients who underwent tricuspid
Prospectivemitral valve47 patientsprocedure
single centerdisease and
cohort studyfunctionalMVR with bioprosthesis:Undersizing of TV annulus has been
(level IIb)TR underwent3 patientseffective even with the De Vega procedure
surgery forTVRep with De Vega procedure:
MVR and TV33 patients
repair
OutcomeTVRep group with 3+ or 4+
TV repairTR Grade 0 or 1+: 19 patients
performed if(73%) Grade 1+ or 2+:
indexed TV3 patients (11.5%) Grade 2+
annular dimensionor 3+: 1 pt (3.8%) Grade 3+ to
>21 mm/m24+: 3 patients (11.5%)
Two patients of five with TV
annulus >21 mm/m2 who did
not undergo TV annuloplasty had
significant TR at follow-up
Dreyfus et al.,Between 1989 andMortalityNo significant differenceRetrospective study; consecutive patients
(2005), Ann2001, 311 patients(group 1=1.8%; group 2=0.7%)
Thorac Surg,underwent mitral10 years follow-up patients
UK, [11]valve repairActuarial survival rateGroup 1=97.3%, 96.2%, and
(MVR). Tricuspid85.5%; group 2=98.5%,Precise and reproducible method of TV
Retrospectiveannuloplasty98.5%, and 90.3% at 3, 5, andsizing is used
study (level IIb)performed if10 years, respectively
tricuspid annularDemonstrates little or no correlation
diameter ≥70 mmNYHA classImproved in group MVR+TVbetween tricuspid dilatation and
regardless of theannuloplasty (groupregurgitation
grade of1=1.59±0.84; group
regurgitation.2=1.11±0.31;Tricuspid dilatation is more reliable than
Group 1 MVRP<0.001)TR when assessing secondary TV disease
alone (163
patients; 54.4%);TR gradeIncreased >2 grades in
Group 2 MVR48% of group 1 (MVR alone)
plus tricuspidand only 2% in group 2 (MVR+
annuloplasty (148TV annuloplasty)
patients; 47.6%)
McCarthy et al.,From 1990 toFollow-up8 years (3302 patient-years)Retrospective study no consistent,
(2004), J Thorac1999, 790 patientsaccurate data for right ventricular function,
Cardiovasc Surg,underwentLeft-sided valveMVR 425 patients (54%)size and geometry, TV annular size, PAPs
USA, [12]TV annuloplastysurgery and other
for functionalproceduresMVRep 276 patients (35%)No analysis of residual MR
Cohort studyregurgitation using
(level IIb)4 techniques:AVR 199 patients (25%)No analytical correlation between TR and
1. Carpentier–survival or progression of NYHA class
Edwards semi-rigidAVRep 15 patients (2%)
ringResidual TR in 14% of patients early after
2. Cosgrove–CABG 205 patients (265)operation
Edwards flexible
bandDistribution of patientsCarpentier: 139 patientsLate worsening (beyond 6 months)
3. De Vegaaccording to TV repair(17%)associated with patient disease factors
proceduretechniqueAND with avoidable causes such as trans-
4. Peri-GuardCosgrove: 291 patients (37%)tricuspid pacing leads and type of
annuloplastyannuloplasty
De Vega: 116 patients (15%)
2 non-ring annuloplasties, De Vega and
Peri-Guard: 243 patients (31%)Peri-Guard, worsening of TR.
Reoperation rateFreedom from reoperation
1 month: 99%
8 years: 97%
Progression to gradeCarpentier 3+: 10% - 10% -
3+ or 4+ TR according11% - 11% 4+: 5.2% - 5.5% -
to TV repair technique6% - 6% (P=0.7)
1 monthCosgrove 3+: 10% - 12% -
1 year12% - NA 4+: 5.3% - 6% - 6% - NA
5 years(P=0.05)
8 years
De Vega 3+: 9% - 12% - 17% -
20% 4+: 4.6 - 6% - 11% - 13%
(P=0.002)
Peri-Guard 3+: 10% - 13% -
19% - 22% 4+: 5.4% - 7% - 13% -
15% (P=0.0009)
Pacemaker leadPreop PMK Lead vs. No PMK
influence on 3+ and 4+Lead
TR prevalence
16% - 42% vs. 15% - 23%
(1 month–5 years)
Preop TR influence of9% - 14% - 22% at 1 month
late TR development
(Prevalence of 3+ or18% - 23% - 29% at 5 years
4+)
1. grades 0 vs. 1+
2. 2+ vs. 3+
3. vs. 4+
Risk factors for late TRLV dysfunction (P=0.0002)
worseningOne-system disease (P=0.007)
AF (P=0.01) PMK lead
(P=0.04)
Tang et al.,Between 1978 andFollow-up duration5.9±4.9 years (rangeMajority of patients undergoing TV repair
(2006), Circulation,2003, 702 patients0–21 years)have secondary (‘functional’) regurgitation
Canada, [13]underwent TV
repair in the settingTR repairDe Vega procedure 493Uncorrected moderate and severe TR may
Retrospectiveof concomitantpatientspersist or even worsen after mitral valve
study (level IIb)left-sided valvesurgery
surgery and‘Ring’ annuloplasty 209 patients:
revascularizationCarpentier n. 114 (54%)Annuloplasty ring refers significant
Duran n. 52 (25%)improvement over De Vega repair in long-
Cosgrove n. 43 (21%)term survival and event-free survival, as
well as recurrence of TR
Functional classRing vs. non ring TV repair
NYHA III–IV 20% vs. 25%Beneficial effects of a TV annuloplasty
ring were independent of the type of
Late TRRing group No TR 15%mitral valve surgery performed
Trivial-to-mild TR 55%
Moderate-to-severe TR 30%Recurrence of TR was not significantly
associated with the recurrence of MR
Non-ring group No TR 10%
Trivial-to-mild TR 54%
Moderate-to-severe TR 36%
OutcomesNo ring vs. ring (15 years)
Freedom from TR 39±11% vs.
82±5% (P=0.003)
Long-term survival 36±8% vs.
49±5% (P=0.007)
Event-free survival 17±6%
vs. 34±5%
PredictorsAnnuloplasty ring
Long-term survival (HR 0.7;
P=0.03)
Event-free survival (HR 0.8;
P=0.04)
Kim et al.,From JanuaryDistribution of patientsCarpentier: 139 patients (17%)Retrospective study
(2005),1994 to Decemberaccording to TV repair
Circulation,1997, 170 patientstechniqueCosgrove: 291 patients (37%)Long follow-up
Korea, [14]underwent left-
side valve surgeryDe Vega: 116 patients (15%)Tricuspid repair techniques used are also
Retrospectiveand MAZE (Coxknown to be burden by high late TR
studyIII) operation forPeri-Guard: 243 patients (31%)recurrence
(level IIb)AF Group I 44
patients in sinusReoperation rateFreedom from reoperationAF affects the worsening of TR over time
rhythm; Group II1 month: 99%
48 patients in AF8 years: 97%MAZE can prevent this course
with MAZE and
Group III 78Preoperative TR gradeGroup I 12 patients (27.3%)Recovery and maintenance of atrial
patients withoutGroup II 8 patients (16.7%)mechanical activity are of great value for
MAZEGroup III 26 patients (33.3%)such a benefit
Progression of TR atImmediate results (significant
follow-upTR) Group I 3 patients
(6.8%) Group II 1 pt (2.1%)
Group III 11 patients (14.1%)
P=NS among groups
Post-op results (significant TR)
Group I 3/41 patients
(7.3%) Group II 6/47 pt (12.8%)
Group III 26/67 patients (38.8%)
P=0.001 Group I vs. Group III
P=0.005 Group II vs. Group III
Atrial contractilityGroup II (+MAZE) 38 patients
contribution andof Group II maintained sinus
analysisrhythm (Group IIa) 10 patients
with no LA mechanical activity
(AF, accelerated junctional
rhythm, sinus rhythm)
Group IIa had smaller
LA size preoperatively and
lower TR grade at the final
follow-up than those in Group IIb
(P=0.038; P=0.025)
Left-side valve surgeryMVR/MVRep 174 patients
(51.9%)
AV surgery alone 74 patients
(22.1%)
Combined MV+AV surgery
87 patients (4.5%) MVR/MVRep
174 patients (51.9%)
AV surgery alone 74 patients
(22.1%)
Combined MV+AV surgery
87 patients (4.5%)
TV surgery andAnnuloplasty 15 patients (4.5%)
technique
TR developmentSignificant: 90 patients (26.9%)
Severe in 25 patients (7.5%)
TR population and riskAge (47.6±13.4 vs. 44.3±13.2
factors (TR+ vs. TR-)years, P=0.04)
Preop AF (83.3 vs. 46.5%,
P<0.001)
LA dimension (56.9±13.2
vs. 52.4 ±11.5 mm, P=0.006)
Prior valve surgery (40.0 vs.
25.3%, P=0.01).
Event-free survivalTR- group
at 100, 140, 160 and97.0±1.1%
175 months87.7±2.8%
85.9±2.6%
85.9±2.6%
TR+ group
94.4±2.4%
86.2±3.7%
70.9±5.9%
62.0±9.8%
P=0.03
Jonjev et al.,From July 1994Follow-up durationMean 42 months (rangeIn end-stage heart disease and selected
(2007), J Cardto July 2004,1–120 months)patient population the RADO procedure is
Surg, Serbia and226 of 294effective
Montenegro, [16]patients whoFunctional statusPreopertative NYHA class III
underwent surgical70 patients (39.88%)Concomitant reduction of mitral and
Prospectiveintervention forNYHA class IV 126 patientstricuspid insufficiency provides early and
study (level IIb)chronic ischemic(69.02%) mean NYHA classlong-term beneficial effect, according with
mitral3.9the natural history of the disease
regurgitation
had reductiveSurgical procedureMitral valve surgeryNo data are provided about the long-term
annuloplasty ofefficacy of De Vega annuloplasty for the
double orificesCarpentier mitral ringprevention of late TR development
(RADO)37 patients (16.38%)
Semicircular posterior annuloplasty
189 patients (69.02%)
TV surgery
De Vega annuloplasty
226 patients (100%)
Follow-upMean NYHA class 1.9 mean
EF preoperative 25% to
postoperative 34%
RADO resultsMitral valve insufficiency
mean grade 3.7±0.4
preoperative to 0.7±0.3
postoperative
TV insufficiency mean grade
3.4±0.4 preoperative to
0.9±0.2 prostoperative
Survival5 years–10 years
61.5±4.0% – 38.05±8.0%
Freedom fromAt 10 years 60.0±6.7%
decompensation
De Bonis et al.,Ninety-one DCMFollow-up1.8±1.2 years (range 0.5–5.7Retrospective study
(2008), Eur Jpatients (mean ageyears)
Cardiothorac Surg,61±11.3)No consistent, accurate data were available
Italy, [17]submitted to MVLeft-sided surgeryEdge-to-edge+undersizedpreoperatively and at follow-up regarding
repair (±tricuspidand concomitantannuloplasty 46 patientsright atrial dimension, tricuspid annular size
Cohort studyrepair) forprocedures(50.5%) undersizedand degree of leaflet tethering
(level IIb)functional MRannuloplasty 45 patients (49.4%)
Small number of patients included
CABG 41 patients (45%)
uncorrected moderate or less TR in patients
AF surgery 14 patients (15.3%)with functional MR often persist and
worsen over time
TV surgical13 patients (3+/4+ or
intervention>TR) had TV annuloplasty:Annular dilatation and tethering as
underlying mechanisms of late TR
De Vega Procedure: 7 patients
Ring annuloplasty:RV function assessment is essential to
6 patientsguide the surgical intervention
No TV annuloplasty: 78 patientsAbsence of ‘reverse remodelling’ influences
(with TR<2+/4+)late TR development
Evolution of fTRAbsent/mild 52 patients (57.1%)
Moderate 28 patients (30.7%)
Moderately severe 9 patients
(9.8%)
Severe 2 patients (2.2%)
11 of 91 patients (12%) had
progression of TR
14 of the 78 patients (17.9%)
no-TR had worsening of TR at
least of 2 grades
TR evolutionAnnular dilatation in 75 patients
mechanismstethering in 6 patients
Predictors of significantRV dilatation (OR 8.3, P=0.009)
late TR
Pre-op. RV dysfunction (OR
13.7, P=0.0001)
TR grade at discharge (OR 5.4,
P=0.01)
PulmonarySignificant (>3+) TR at
hypertensionfollow-up:
37% (9/24) among the patients
with pulmonary hypertension
3% (2/67) among those with
SPAP <40 mmHg at the last
echocardiogram
(P<0.0001)
Pattern of LV‘reverse remodeling’ group:
remodelingSignificant TR in only 1 of 49
patients (2%) that demonstrated
reverse remodeling
No ‘reverse remodeling group’
significant TR in 10 of 42
patients (23.8%)
(P=0.04)

fMR, functional mitral regurgitation; MVRep, mitral valve repair; FTR, functional tricuspid regurgitation; TVRep, tricuspid valve repair; PMK, pacemaker; TTE, trans-thoracic echocardiography; TA, tricuspid annulus; MR, mitral regurgitation; AVR, aortic valve replacement; AVRep, aortic valve repair; AV, aortic valve; HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio.

Table 1

Best evidence papers

Author, datePatient groupOutcomesKey resultsComments
and country,
Study type
(level of evidence)
Bonow et al.,Class ISevere TR in the setting of
ACC/AHA VHDsurgery for multivalvular
Guidelines: (2008),disease should be
focused updatecorrected
(level of evidence: c)Class IITricuspid annuloplasty is
reasonable for mild TR in
patients undergoing MV surgery
when there is pulmonary
hypertension or tricuspid
annular dilatation
Vahanian et al.,Class IIaConcomitant TV repair if
(2007), EurTA diameter >40 mm
Heart J, ESC
guidelinesTV repair in patients with
symptomatic, isolated TR late
after left-sided valve surgery,
in absence of left-sided
myocardial or RV dysfunction
and without severe pulmonary
hypertension
Turina et al.,170 patientsFollow-upMean 10.6 years (1802Retrospective study
(1999),(between 1975patient-years)
Circulation,and 1989) whoSignificant TV regurgitation requiring
Switzerland, [2]underwent surgerySurgical proceduresDouble valve surgery 170surgical repair worsened the prognosis
for chronicpatients
Retrospectivecombined aorticAdvice for TV repair when hemodynamic
study (level IIb)and mitral valvularTV surgery 29 patients (17%)significant regurgitation is present
disease
CABG 7 patients (4%)
Ascending aorta surgery 7
patients (4%)
Reoperation involvingTricuspid replacement 2
TVpatients
Tricuspid reconstruction
2 patients
Survival rate inAt 10 years (cumulative survival)
patients with TR
With TV reconstruction 57%
Without TV reconstruction 68%
Predictors of lateAge (P=0.0011) LVEF
outcome(P=0.0008) Additional TV
regurgitation
(P=0.007)
Nath et al.,5223 patientsOne-year survival91.7% with no TR,Retrospective study
(2004), J Am Collundergoing90.3% with mild TR,
Cardiol, USA, [3]echocardiography;78.9% with moderate TR,Huge cohort of patients
four years follow-63.9% with severe TR
Retrospectiveup; comparisonLong follow-up
study (level IIb)survival differencesTR grade, pulmonaryModerate or greater TR
among TR gradesartery pressure andincreased mortality regardlessUnknown NYHA class at follow-up
mortalityof PASP HR 1.31 for PASP
>40 mmHg; HR 1.32 PANo data correlation with MR grade and TR
<40 mmHg
TR grade, LVEF andModerate or greater TR
mortalityincreased mortality
regardless of EF
HR 1.49 EF<50%
HR 1.54 EF>50%
Porter et al.,65 patients withFollow-up duration11.3±8 years (rangeRetrospective study
(1999), J Heartrheumatic heart1–30 years)
Valve Dis,disease who hadNo data about preoperative TR
Israel, [4]undergone MVRLeft-sided valveMV stenosis 44 patients (67%)
without TVpathology and surgicalMV regurgitation 21 patientsNo data on preoperative RV status
Retrospectivesurgeryintervention(33%)
study case seriesOutlines the late development rate of TR
(level IIIb)Mitral valve replacement in allwhen uncorrected at the time of left-sided
casesvalve surgery
Outcomes44 patients (67%) developed
late TR
Moderate 16 patients (36.4%)
Severe 18 patients (41%)
Risk factorsAge RR 1.1 female gender 1.8
Matsuyama et al.,Between MarchMean follow-up8.2±3.6 years (range 1.0–14.5Retrospective study
(2003), Ann Thor1988 andyears)
Surg, Japan, [5]September 2001 ofLong overall follow-up but high variability
174 of 274 patientsLate deaths14 late deaths (8%)of time (may underestimate late TR
Retrospectiveundergoing MVdevelopment in some early patients)
study (level IIb)surgery did notEarly postoperativeTR (3+/4+ or more) in 4
receive concomitantoutcomepatients (2%)Mitral valve repair as left-side valve
TV surgerysurgery in 53% of patients
Follow-up of TR grade28 patients developed TR grade
3+ or more (16%) 46 patientsProgression of TR over time
with preopearative TR 2+/4+,
TR had progression inEarly postoperative TR grade is unreliable
17 patients (37%)for estimation of late TR progression
Risk factors forPreoperative 2+ TR: OR 3.9No assessment of right ventricular
significant TR (3+(P=0.004) AF: OR 9.2 (P=0.03)dysfunction or tricuspid annulus dilatation
or more)left atrium size: OR 2.8
(P=0.03)Strong correlation with AF and atrial size
Recommendation for aggressive TR repair
in selected cases
Matsunaga et al.,From JanuaryTricuspid annuloplasty21 patients had preoperativeRetrospective study
(2005), Circulation,1992 to DecemberTR (moderate or greater)
USA; Japan, [6]2001, 1249 patients underwent TVRepRelatively small number of patients
consecutive(TR-group) 12 patients TR was
Retrospectivepatients with fMRignored (no-TR group)Long and complete follow-up
study (level IIb)underwent CABG
and MVRep. 21TR moderate or greater4 patients (44%) of TR group50% of patients after MVRep showed
patients (30%) hadat follow-up8 patients (67%) of no-TR groupsignificant TR at follow-up
TR before surgery(P=NS)
Presence or absence of residual MR do not
Progression of TR afterSignificant TR 25% at 1 year,affect the incidence of follow-up TR
MVRep53% at 1–3 years, 74%
over 3 yearsRevascularization and MVRep do not
reduce RV pressure overload and do not
Follow-up MR and TR14 of 21 patients (64%) withprevent late TR
significant recurrent MR had
also significant TRIncidence of late TR was independent of
whether the TR was surgically treated or
20 of 48 patients (42%) with noignored (44% vs. 67%; P=NS)
recurrent MR had significant TR
(P=NS)Significant recurrent MR (31%) reinforces
the significance of ventricular geometric
Follow-up echo dataRV systolic pressure in the TRdistortion as ongoing remodelling affecting
group was higher than the no-TRRV and LV geometries
group
LV ejection fraction was not
different between the groups
Calafiore et al.,From JanuaryFollow-up duration68 months (100% complete)Moderate-or-more fTR, if untreated, can
(2009), Ann1988 to Marchimpair both midterm survival and functional
Thorac Surg,2003, 110 patientsMortalityTreated vs. untreated TR groupstatus, even if it seems not to affect early
Italy, [7]with functional30 days: 2% vs. 8.5%outcome
mitral regurgitation(P=0.213) long-term (46/104
Retrospectiveundergoing mitralpatients) 16 patients vs.Reversal of TV remodeling cannot be
study (level IIb)valve surgery30 patientsexpected with MV surgery alone
showed moderate-
or-more functionalTRAt 12 months follow-upFunctional TR progression is not related to
TR repaired with(77 patients)functional MVR progression
De Vega technique
Treated group (42 patients)Surgical technique can then influence the
No TR: 50%late results of TR correction
TR 1+: 31%
TR 2+: 14%
TR 3+: 5%
Untreated group (35 patients)
No TR: 0%
TR 1+: 23%
TR 2+: 37%
TR 3+: 34%
TR 4+: 6%
MVR progression andMV repair (60 patients) MR
influence on fTR3+: >3 patients (5%) Late
recurrence/progressionfTR group vs. non late fTR
2/47 (4.3%) vs. 1/13 (7.7%)
P=0.625
Survival5 years – treated vs. untreated
TR 45.0±6.1% vs. 74.5±5.1%
(P=0.044)
Risk factors ofLower mid-term survival (HR 2.7)
untreated
moderate-or-more TRSurvival in NYHA class II or II
(HR 1.9)
Boyaci et al.,Sixty-eight (68)TR grade, LVEF andModerate or greaterRetrospective study
(2007),patients undergonemortalityTR increased mortality
Angiology,MVR withoutregardless of EFImprovement of functional capacity
Turkey, [8]TV surgeryHR 1.49 EF<50%in 86% of patients with mild
HR 1.54 EF>50%preop TR vs. 54% of those with
Retrospectivesignificant TR
study (level IIb)Preoperative TRMild TR (group I) 42 patients
(62%)Right ventricular pressure fell and remained
lower in patients with mild TR, but not in
Significant TR (group II) 26patients with moderate to severe TR
patients (38%)
Transmitral F-UGroup I vs. Group II (mmHg)
gradient5.2±2.5 vs. 5.6±3.0
(P=NS)
Right ventricularGroup I (mmHg) 47±1.0 to
systolic pressure31±10
trend pre-
postoperativeGroup II 45±9 to 42±12
PulmonaryGroup I vs. Group II (mmHg)
hypertension at F-U31±10 vs. 42±12
(P<0.05)
NYHA Class at F-UGroup I vs. Group II
NYHA I 19% vs. 2% (P<0.05)
NYHA II 67% vs. 46% (P<0.05)
NYHA III 14% vs. 38%
(P<0.05)
Hospitalization/yearGroup I vs. Group II 1.1±0.4
vs. 1.8±0.7
(P<0.05)
Song et al.,Between 1995 andFollow-upClinical 101±24 months (rangeRetrospective study
(2009),2000, 638 patients12–146 months)
Heart,(356 men) withExtensive number of patients
Korea, [9]mild (≤grade 2/4)Echocardiographical
TR underwent64±30 months (range 14–141Outlines the natural history of late TR
Retrospectivesurgery withoutmonths)development
studyany procedure on
(level IIb)the TVLeft-side valve surgeryMitral valve surgeryRheumatic aetiology is strongly associated
323 patientswith development of late significant TR
Aortic valve surgery 221 patientsFemale gender has higher incidence
probably due to higher prevalence of
Double-valve surgeryrheumatic disease in this population
94 patients
AF is the most striking risk factor for
Significant late TRMitral valve surgery 9.6%development of late significant TR
development(31/323 patients)
PH is not associated with TR progression
Aortic valve surgery 3.2%
(7/221 patients)Right ventricular distortion or annular
dilatation is associated with late TR
Double-valve surgery 11.7%development
(11/94 patients)
Impact of rheumaticRheumatic MR 15% (10/65
disease on late TRpatients)
Non-rheumatic MR 5% (7/133
patients)
(P=0.017)
AF239 patients (37%) before
surgery
184 patients persistent AF
18 patients (5%) developed
AF at follow-up
TV annular dilatationTV annulus increased in both
group
Late TR 32±6 to 40±7 mm
Non late TR 40±7 mm
P<0.001
Late TR risk factorsAge (HR 1.0; P=0.005)
Female gender (HR 5.0;
P=0.001) rheumatic aetiology
(HR 3.8; P=0.011) AF (HR
2.6; P=0.035) peak pressure
gradient of TR (HR 1.1; <0.001)
MortalitySignificant TR vs. non late TR
4.9% vs. 16.3%
(P=0.004)
Event-free survivalLate TR vs. non-late TR
76±6% vs. 91±1%
(P<0.001)
Colombo et al.,From JanuaryFollow-up25±15.9 months (range 3–49Prospective study
(2001), Cardiovasc1995 to Decembermonths)
Surg, Italy, [10]1998, 50 patientsAbsence or mild to moderate TR in 83.9%
with rheumaticSurgical procedureMVR with mechanical valve:of patients who underwent tricuspid
Prospectivemitral valve47 patientsprocedure
single centerdisease and
cohort studyfunctionalMVR with bioprosthesis:Undersizing of TV annulus has been
(level IIb)TR underwent3 patientseffective even with the De Vega procedure
surgery forTVRep with De Vega procedure:
MVR and TV33 patients
repair
OutcomeTVRep group with 3+ or 4+
TV repairTR Grade 0 or 1+: 19 patients
performed if(73%) Grade 1+ or 2+:
indexed TV3 patients (11.5%) Grade 2+
annular dimensionor 3+: 1 pt (3.8%) Grade 3+ to
>21 mm/m24+: 3 patients (11.5%)
Two patients of five with TV
annulus >21 mm/m2 who did
not undergo TV annuloplasty had
significant TR at follow-up
Dreyfus et al.,Between 1989 andMortalityNo significant differenceRetrospective study; consecutive patients
(2005), Ann2001, 311 patients(group 1=1.8%; group 2=0.7%)
Thorac Surg,underwent mitral10 years follow-up patients
UK, [11]valve repairActuarial survival rateGroup 1=97.3%, 96.2%, and
(MVR). Tricuspid85.5%; group 2=98.5%,Precise and reproducible method of TV
Retrospectiveannuloplasty98.5%, and 90.3% at 3, 5, andsizing is used
study (level IIb)performed if10 years, respectively
tricuspid annularDemonstrates little or no correlation
diameter ≥70 mmNYHA classImproved in group MVR+TVbetween tricuspid dilatation and
regardless of theannuloplasty (groupregurgitation
grade of1=1.59±0.84; group
regurgitation.2=1.11±0.31;Tricuspid dilatation is more reliable than
Group 1 MVRP<0.001)TR when assessing secondary TV disease
alone (163
patients; 54.4%);TR gradeIncreased >2 grades in
Group 2 MVR48% of group 1 (MVR alone)
plus tricuspidand only 2% in group 2 (MVR+
annuloplasty (148TV annuloplasty)
patients; 47.6%)
McCarthy et al.,From 1990 toFollow-up8 years (3302 patient-years)Retrospective study no consistent,
(2004), J Thorac1999, 790 patientsaccurate data for right ventricular function,
Cardiovasc Surg,underwentLeft-sided valveMVR 425 patients (54%)size and geometry, TV annular size, PAPs
USA, [12]TV annuloplastysurgery and other
for functionalproceduresMVRep 276 patients (35%)No analysis of residual MR
Cohort studyregurgitation using
(level IIb)4 techniques:AVR 199 patients (25%)No analytical correlation between TR and
1. Carpentier–survival or progression of NYHA class
Edwards semi-rigidAVRep 15 patients (2%)
ringResidual TR in 14% of patients early after
2. Cosgrove–CABG 205 patients (265)operation
Edwards flexible
bandDistribution of patientsCarpentier: 139 patientsLate worsening (beyond 6 months)
3. De Vegaaccording to TV repair(17%)associated with patient disease factors
proceduretechniqueAND with avoidable causes such as trans-
4. Peri-GuardCosgrove: 291 patients (37%)tricuspid pacing leads and type of
annuloplastyannuloplasty
De Vega: 116 patients (15%)
2 non-ring annuloplasties, De Vega and
Peri-Guard: 243 patients (31%)Peri-Guard, worsening of TR.
Reoperation rateFreedom from reoperation
1 month: 99%
8 years: 97%
Progression to gradeCarpentier 3+: 10% - 10% -
3+ or 4+ TR according11% - 11% 4+: 5.2% - 5.5% -
to TV repair technique6% - 6% (P=0.7)
1 monthCosgrove 3+: 10% - 12% -
1 year12% - NA 4+: 5.3% - 6% - 6% - NA
5 years(P=0.05)
8 years
De Vega 3+: 9% - 12% - 17% -
20% 4+: 4.6 - 6% - 11% - 13%
(P=0.002)
Peri-Guard 3+: 10% - 13% -
19% - 22% 4+: 5.4% - 7% - 13% -
15% (P=0.0009)
Pacemaker leadPreop PMK Lead vs. No PMK
influence on 3+ and 4+Lead
TR prevalence
16% - 42% vs. 15% - 23%
(1 month–5 years)
Preop TR influence of9% - 14% - 22% at 1 month
late TR development
(Prevalence of 3+ or18% - 23% - 29% at 5 years
4+)
1. grades 0 vs. 1+
2. 2+ vs. 3+
3. vs. 4+
Risk factors for late TRLV dysfunction (P=0.0002)
worseningOne-system disease (P=0.007)
AF (P=0.01) PMK lead
(P=0.04)
Tang et al.,Between 1978 andFollow-up duration5.9±4.9 years (rangeMajority of patients undergoing TV repair
(2006), Circulation,2003, 702 patients0–21 years)have secondary (‘functional’) regurgitation
Canada, [13]underwent TV
repair in the settingTR repairDe Vega procedure 493Uncorrected moderate and severe TR may
Retrospectiveof concomitantpatientspersist or even worsen after mitral valve
study (level IIb)left-sided valvesurgery
surgery and‘Ring’ annuloplasty 209 patients:
revascularizationCarpentier n. 114 (54%)Annuloplasty ring refers significant
Duran n. 52 (25%)improvement over De Vega repair in long-
Cosgrove n. 43 (21%)term survival and event-free survival, as
well as recurrence of TR
Functional classRing vs. non ring TV repair
NYHA III–IV 20% vs. 25%Beneficial effects of a TV annuloplasty
ring were independent of the type of
Late TRRing group No TR 15%mitral valve surgery performed
Trivial-to-mild TR 55%
Moderate-to-severe TR 30%Recurrence of TR was not significantly
associated with the recurrence of MR
Non-ring group No TR 10%
Trivial-to-mild TR 54%
Moderate-to-severe TR 36%
OutcomesNo ring vs. ring (15 years)
Freedom from TR 39±11% vs.
82±5% (P=0.003)
Long-term survival 36±8% vs.
49±5% (P=0.007)
Event-free survival 17±6%
vs. 34±5%
PredictorsAnnuloplasty ring
Long-term survival (HR 0.7;
P=0.03)
Event-free survival (HR 0.8;
P=0.04)
Kim et al.,From JanuaryDistribution of patientsCarpentier: 139 patients (17%)Retrospective study
(2005),1994 to Decemberaccording to TV repair
Circulation,1997, 170 patientstechniqueCosgrove: 291 patients (37%)Long follow-up
Korea, [14]underwent left-
side valve surgeryDe Vega: 116 patients (15%)Tricuspid repair techniques used are also
Retrospectiveand MAZE (Coxknown to be burden by high late TR
studyIII) operation forPeri-Guard: 243 patients (31%)recurrence
(level IIb)AF Group I 44
patients in sinusReoperation rateFreedom from reoperationAF affects the worsening of TR over time
rhythm; Group II1 month: 99%
48 patients in AF8 years: 97%MAZE can prevent this course
with MAZE and
Group III 78Preoperative TR gradeGroup I 12 patients (27.3%)Recovery and maintenance of atrial
patients withoutGroup II 8 patients (16.7%)mechanical activity are of great value for
MAZEGroup III 26 patients (33.3%)such a benefit
Progression of TR atImmediate results (significant
follow-upTR) Group I 3 patients
(6.8%) Group II 1 pt (2.1%)
Group III 11 patients (14.1%)
P=NS among groups
Post-op results (significant TR)
Group I 3/41 patients
(7.3%) Group II 6/47 pt (12.8%)
Group III 26/67 patients (38.8%)
P=0.001 Group I vs. Group III
P=0.005 Group II vs. Group III
Atrial contractilityGroup II (+MAZE) 38 patients
contribution andof Group II maintained sinus
analysisrhythm (Group IIa) 10 patients
with no LA mechanical activity
(AF, accelerated junctional
rhythm, sinus rhythm)
Group IIa had smaller
LA size preoperatively and
lower TR grade at the final
follow-up than those in Group IIb
(P=0.038; P=0.025)
Left-side valve surgeryMVR/MVRep 174 patients
(51.9%)
AV surgery alone 74 patients
(22.1%)
Combined MV+AV surgery
87 patients (4.5%) MVR/MVRep
174 patients (51.9%)
AV surgery alone 74 patients
(22.1%)
Combined MV+AV surgery
87 patients (4.5%)
TV surgery andAnnuloplasty 15 patients (4.5%)
technique
TR developmentSignificant: 90 patients (26.9%)
Severe in 25 patients (7.5%)
TR population and riskAge (47.6±13.4 vs. 44.3±13.2
factors (TR+ vs. TR-)years, P=0.04)
Preop AF (83.3 vs. 46.5%,
P<0.001)
LA dimension (56.9±13.2
vs. 52.4 ±11.5 mm, P=0.006)
Prior valve surgery (40.0 vs.
25.3%, P=0.01).
Event-free survivalTR- group
at 100, 140, 160 and97.0±1.1%
175 months87.7±2.8%
85.9±2.6%
85.9±2.6%
TR+ group
94.4±2.4%
86.2±3.7%
70.9±5.9%
62.0±9.8%
P=0.03
Jonjev et al.,From July 1994Follow-up durationMean 42 months (rangeIn end-stage heart disease and selected
(2007), J Cardto July 2004,1–120 months)patient population the RADO procedure is
Surg, Serbia and226 of 294effective
Montenegro, [16]patients whoFunctional statusPreopertative NYHA class III
underwent surgical70 patients (39.88%)Concomitant reduction of mitral and
Prospectiveintervention forNYHA class IV 126 patientstricuspid insufficiency provides early and
study (level IIb)chronic ischemic(69.02%) mean NYHA classlong-term beneficial effect, according with
mitral3.9the natural history of the disease
regurgitation
had reductiveSurgical procedureMitral valve surgeryNo data are provided about the long-term
annuloplasty ofefficacy of De Vega annuloplasty for the
double orificesCarpentier mitral ringprevention of late TR development
(RADO)37 patients (16.38%)
Semicircular posterior annuloplasty
189 patients (69.02%)
TV surgery
De Vega annuloplasty
226 patients (100%)
Follow-upMean NYHA class 1.9 mean
EF preoperative 25% to
postoperative 34%
RADO resultsMitral valve insufficiency
mean grade 3.7±0.4
preoperative to 0.7±0.3
postoperative
TV insufficiency mean grade
3.4±0.4 preoperative to
0.9±0.2 prostoperative
Survival5 years–10 years
61.5±4.0% – 38.05±8.0%
Freedom fromAt 10 years 60.0±6.7%
decompensation
De Bonis et al.,Ninety-one DCMFollow-up1.8±1.2 years (range 0.5–5.7Retrospective study
(2008), Eur Jpatients (mean ageyears)
Cardiothorac Surg,61±11.3)No consistent, accurate data were available
Italy, [17]submitted to MVLeft-sided surgeryEdge-to-edge+undersizedpreoperatively and at follow-up regarding
repair (±tricuspidand concomitantannuloplasty 46 patientsright atrial dimension, tricuspid annular size
Cohort studyrepair) forprocedures(50.5%) undersizedand degree of leaflet tethering
(level IIb)functional MRannuloplasty 45 patients (49.4%)
Small number of patients included
CABG 41 patients (45%)
uncorrected moderate or less TR in patients
AF surgery 14 patients (15.3%)with functional MR often persist and
worsen over time
TV surgical13 patients (3+/4+ or
intervention>TR) had TV annuloplasty:Annular dilatation and tethering as
underlying mechanisms of late TR
De Vega Procedure: 7 patients
Ring annuloplasty:RV function assessment is essential to
6 patientsguide the surgical intervention
No TV annuloplasty: 78 patientsAbsence of ‘reverse remodelling’ influences
(with TR<2+/4+)late TR development
Evolution of fTRAbsent/mild 52 patients (57.1%)
Moderate 28 patients (30.7%)
Moderately severe 9 patients
(9.8%)
Severe 2 patients (2.2%)
11 of 91 patients (12%) had
progression of TR
14 of the 78 patients (17.9%)
no-TR had worsening of TR at
least of 2 grades
TR evolutionAnnular dilatation in 75 patients
mechanismstethering in 6 patients
Predictors of significantRV dilatation (OR 8.3, P=0.009)
late TR
Pre-op. RV dysfunction (OR
13.7, P=0.0001)
TR grade at discharge (OR 5.4,
P=0.01)
PulmonarySignificant (>3+) TR at
hypertensionfollow-up:
37% (9/24) among the patients
with pulmonary hypertension
3% (2/67) among those with
SPAP <40 mmHg at the last
echocardiogram
(P<0.0001)
Pattern of LV‘reverse remodeling’ group:
remodelingSignificant TR in only 1 of 49
patients (2%) that demonstrated
reverse remodeling
No ‘reverse remodeling group’
significant TR in 10 of 42
patients (23.8%)
(P=0.04)
Author, datePatient groupOutcomesKey resultsComments
and country,
Study type
(level of evidence)
Bonow et al.,Class ISevere TR in the setting of
ACC/AHA VHDsurgery for multivalvular
Guidelines: (2008),disease should be
focused updatecorrected
(level of evidence: c)Class IITricuspid annuloplasty is
reasonable for mild TR in
patients undergoing MV surgery
when there is pulmonary
hypertension or tricuspid
annular dilatation
Vahanian et al.,Class IIaConcomitant TV repair if
(2007), EurTA diameter >40 mm
Heart J, ESC
guidelinesTV repair in patients with
symptomatic, isolated TR late
after left-sided valve surgery,
in absence of left-sided
myocardial or RV dysfunction
and without severe pulmonary
hypertension
Turina et al.,170 patientsFollow-upMean 10.6 years (1802Retrospective study
(1999),(between 1975patient-years)
Circulation,and 1989) whoSignificant TV regurgitation requiring
Switzerland, [2]underwent surgerySurgical proceduresDouble valve surgery 170surgical repair worsened the prognosis
for chronicpatients
Retrospectivecombined aorticAdvice for TV repair when hemodynamic
study (level IIb)and mitral valvularTV surgery 29 patients (17%)significant regurgitation is present
disease
CABG 7 patients (4%)
Ascending aorta surgery 7
patients (4%)
Reoperation involvingTricuspid replacement 2
TVpatients
Tricuspid reconstruction
2 patients
Survival rate inAt 10 years (cumulative survival)
patients with TR
With TV reconstruction 57%
Without TV reconstruction 68%
Predictors of lateAge (P=0.0011) LVEF
outcome(P=0.0008) Additional TV
regurgitation
(P=0.007)
Nath et al.,5223 patientsOne-year survival91.7% with no TR,Retrospective study
(2004), J Am Collundergoing90.3% with mild TR,
Cardiol, USA, [3]echocardiography;78.9% with moderate TR,Huge cohort of patients
four years follow-63.9% with severe TR
Retrospectiveup; comparisonLong follow-up
study (level IIb)survival differencesTR grade, pulmonaryModerate or greater TR
among TR gradesartery pressure andincreased mortality regardlessUnknown NYHA class at follow-up
mortalityof PASP HR 1.31 for PASP
>40 mmHg; HR 1.32 PANo data correlation with MR grade and TR
<40 mmHg
TR grade, LVEF andModerate or greater TR
mortalityincreased mortality
regardless of EF
HR 1.49 EF<50%
HR 1.54 EF>50%
Porter et al.,65 patients withFollow-up duration11.3±8 years (rangeRetrospective study
(1999), J Heartrheumatic heart1–30 years)
Valve Dis,disease who hadNo data about preoperative TR
Israel, [4]undergone MVRLeft-sided valveMV stenosis 44 patients (67%)
without TVpathology and surgicalMV regurgitation 21 patientsNo data on preoperative RV status
Retrospectivesurgeryintervention(33%)
study case seriesOutlines the late development rate of TR
(level IIIb)Mitral valve replacement in allwhen uncorrected at the time of left-sided
casesvalve surgery
Outcomes44 patients (67%) developed
late TR
Moderate 16 patients (36.4%)
Severe 18 patients (41%)
Risk factorsAge RR 1.1 female gender 1.8
Matsuyama et al.,Between MarchMean follow-up8.2±3.6 years (range 1.0–14.5Retrospective study
(2003), Ann Thor1988 andyears)
Surg, Japan, [5]September 2001 ofLong overall follow-up but high variability
174 of 274 patientsLate deaths14 late deaths (8%)of time (may underestimate late TR
Retrospectiveundergoing MVdevelopment in some early patients)
study (level IIb)surgery did notEarly postoperativeTR (3+/4+ or more) in 4
receive concomitantoutcomepatients (2%)Mitral valve repair as left-side valve
TV surgerysurgery in 53% of patients
Follow-up of TR grade28 patients developed TR grade
3+ or more (16%) 46 patientsProgression of TR over time
with preopearative TR 2+/4+,
TR had progression inEarly postoperative TR grade is unreliable
17 patients (37%)for estimation of late TR progression
Risk factors forPreoperative 2+ TR: OR 3.9No assessment of right ventricular
significant TR (3+(P=0.004) AF: OR 9.2 (P=0.03)dysfunction or tricuspid annulus dilatation
or more)left atrium size: OR 2.8
(P=0.03)Strong correlation with AF and atrial size
Recommendation for aggressive TR repair
in selected cases
Matsunaga et al.,From JanuaryTricuspid annuloplasty21 patients had preoperativeRetrospective study
(2005), Circulation,1992 to DecemberTR (moderate or greater)
USA; Japan, [6]2001, 1249 patients underwent TVRepRelatively small number of patients
consecutive(TR-group) 12 patients TR was
Retrospectivepatients with fMRignored (no-TR group)Long and complete follow-up
study (level IIb)underwent CABG
and MVRep. 21TR moderate or greater4 patients (44%) of TR group50% of patients after MVRep showed
patients (30%) hadat follow-up8 patients (67%) of no-TR groupsignificant TR at follow-up
TR before surgery(P=NS)
Presence or absence of residual MR do not
Progression of TR afterSignificant TR 25% at 1 year,affect the incidence of follow-up TR
MVRep53% at 1–3 years, 74%
over 3 yearsRevascularization and MVRep do not
reduce RV pressure overload and do not
Follow-up MR and TR14 of 21 patients (64%) withprevent late TR
significant recurrent MR had
also significant TRIncidence of late TR was independent of
whether the TR was surgically treated or
20 of 48 patients (42%) with noignored (44% vs. 67%; P=NS)
recurrent MR had significant TR
(P=NS)Significant recurrent MR (31%) reinforces
the significance of ventricular geometric
Follow-up echo dataRV systolic pressure in the TRdistortion as ongoing remodelling affecting
group was higher than the no-TRRV and LV geometries
group
LV ejection fraction was not
different between the groups
Calafiore et al.,From JanuaryFollow-up duration68 months (100% complete)Moderate-or-more fTR, if untreated, can
(2009), Ann1988 to Marchimpair both midterm survival and functional
Thorac Surg,2003, 110 patientsMortalityTreated vs. untreated TR groupstatus, even if it seems not to affect early
Italy, [7]with functional30 days: 2% vs. 8.5%outcome
mitral regurgitation(P=0.213) long-term (46/104
Retrospectiveundergoing mitralpatients) 16 patients vs.Reversal of TV remodeling cannot be
study (level IIb)valve surgery30 patientsexpected with MV surgery alone
showed moderate-
or-more functionalTRAt 12 months follow-upFunctional TR progression is not related to
TR repaired with(77 patients)functional MVR progression
De Vega technique
Treated group (42 patients)Surgical technique can then influence the
No TR: 50%late results of TR correction
TR 1+: 31%
TR 2+: 14%
TR 3+: 5%
Untreated group (35 patients)
No TR: 0%
TR 1+: 23%
TR 2+: 37%
TR 3+: 34%
TR 4+: 6%
MVR progression andMV repair (60 patients) MR
influence on fTR3+: >3 patients (5%) Late
recurrence/progressionfTR group vs. non late fTR
2/47 (4.3%) vs. 1/13 (7.7%)
P=0.625
Survival5 years – treated vs. untreated
TR 45.0±6.1% vs. 74.5±5.1%
(P=0.044)
Risk factors ofLower mid-term survival (HR 2.7)
untreated
moderate-or-more TRSurvival in NYHA class II or II
(HR 1.9)
Boyaci et al.,Sixty-eight (68)TR grade, LVEF andModerate or greaterRetrospective study
(2007),patients undergonemortalityTR increased mortality
Angiology,MVR withoutregardless of EFImprovement of functional capacity
Turkey, [8]TV surgeryHR 1.49 EF<50%in 86% of patients with mild
HR 1.54 EF>50%preop TR vs. 54% of those with
Retrospectivesignificant TR
study (level IIb)Preoperative TRMild TR (group I) 42 patients
(62%)Right ventricular pressure fell and remained
lower in patients with mild TR, but not in
Significant TR (group II) 26patients with moderate to severe TR
patients (38%)
Transmitral F-UGroup I vs. Group II (mmHg)
gradient5.2±2.5 vs. 5.6±3.0
(P=NS)
Right ventricularGroup I (mmHg) 47±1.0 to
systolic pressure31±10
trend pre-
postoperativeGroup II 45±9 to 42±12
PulmonaryGroup I vs. Group II (mmHg)
hypertension at F-U31±10 vs. 42±12
(P<0.05)
NYHA Class at F-UGroup I vs. Group II
NYHA I 19% vs. 2% (P<0.05)
NYHA II 67% vs. 46% (P<0.05)
NYHA III 14% vs. 38%
(P<0.05)
Hospitalization/yearGroup I vs. Group II 1.1±0.4
vs. 1.8±0.7
(P<0.05)
Song et al.,Between 1995 andFollow-upClinical 101±24 months (rangeRetrospective study
(2009),2000, 638 patients12–146 months)
Heart,(356 men) withExtensive number of patients
Korea, [9]mild (≤grade 2/4)Echocardiographical
TR underwent64±30 months (range 14–141Outlines the natural history of late TR
Retrospectivesurgery withoutmonths)development
studyany procedure on
(level IIb)the TVLeft-side valve surgeryMitral valve surgeryRheumatic aetiology is strongly associated
323 patientswith development of late significant TR
Aortic valve surgery 221 patientsFemale gender has higher incidence
probably due to higher prevalence of
Double-valve surgeryrheumatic disease in this population
94 patients
AF is the most striking risk factor for
Significant late TRMitral valve surgery 9.6%development of late significant TR
development(31/323 patients)
PH is not associated with TR progression
Aortic valve surgery 3.2%
(7/221 patients)Right ventricular distortion or annular
dilatation is associated with late TR
Double-valve surgery 11.7%development
(11/94 patients)
Impact of rheumaticRheumatic MR 15% (10/65
disease on late TRpatients)
Non-rheumatic MR 5% (7/133
patients)
(P=0.017)
AF239 patients (37%) before
surgery
184 patients persistent AF
18 patients (5%) developed
AF at follow-up
TV annular dilatationTV annulus increased in both
group
Late TR 32±6 to 40±7 mm
Non late TR 40±7 mm
P<0.001
Late TR risk factorsAge (HR 1.0; P=0.005)
Female gender (HR 5.0;
P=0.001) rheumatic aetiology
(HR 3.8; P=0.011) AF (HR
2.6; P=0.035) peak pressure
gradient of TR (HR 1.1; <0.001)
MortalitySignificant TR vs. non late TR
4.9% vs. 16.3%
(P=0.004)
Event-free survivalLate TR vs. non-late TR
76±6% vs. 91±1%
(P<0.001)
Colombo et al.,From JanuaryFollow-up25±15.9 months (range 3–49Prospective study
(2001), Cardiovasc1995 to Decembermonths)
Surg, Italy, [10]1998, 50 patientsAbsence or mild to moderate TR in 83.9%
with rheumaticSurgical procedureMVR with mechanical valve:of patients who underwent tricuspid
Prospectivemitral valve47 patientsprocedure
single centerdisease and
cohort studyfunctionalMVR with bioprosthesis:Undersizing of TV annulus has been
(level IIb)TR underwent3 patientseffective even with the De Vega procedure
surgery forTVRep with De Vega procedure:
MVR and TV33 patients
repair
OutcomeTVRep group with 3+ or 4+
TV repairTR Grade 0 or 1+: 19 patients
performed if(73%) Grade 1+ or 2+:
indexed TV3 patients (11.5%) Grade 2+
annular dimensionor 3+: 1 pt (3.8%) Grade 3+ to
>21 mm/m24+: 3 patients (11.5%)
Two patients of five with TV
annulus >21 mm/m2 who did
not undergo TV annuloplasty had
significant TR at follow-up
Dreyfus et al.,Between 1989 andMortalityNo significant differenceRetrospective study; consecutive patients
(2005), Ann2001, 311 patients(group 1=1.8%; group 2=0.7%)
Thorac Surg,underwent mitral10 years follow-up patients
UK, [11]valve repairActuarial survival rateGroup 1=97.3%, 96.2%, and
(MVR). Tricuspid85.5%; group 2=98.5%,Precise and reproducible method of TV
Retrospectiveannuloplasty98.5%, and 90.3% at 3, 5, andsizing is used
study (level IIb)performed if10 years, respectively
tricuspid annularDemonstrates little or no correlation
diameter ≥70 mmNYHA classImproved in group MVR+TVbetween tricuspid dilatation and
regardless of theannuloplasty (groupregurgitation
grade of1=1.59±0.84; group
regurgitation.2=1.11±0.31;Tricuspid dilatation is more reliable than
Group 1 MVRP<0.001)TR when assessing secondary TV disease
alone (163
patients; 54.4%);TR gradeIncreased >2 grades in
Group 2 MVR48% of group 1 (MVR alone)
plus tricuspidand only 2% in group 2 (MVR+
annuloplasty (148TV annuloplasty)
patients; 47.6%)
McCarthy et al.,From 1990 toFollow-up8 years (3302 patient-years)Retrospective study no consistent,
(2004), J Thorac1999, 790 patientsaccurate data for right ventricular function,
Cardiovasc Surg,underwentLeft-sided valveMVR 425 patients (54%)size and geometry, TV annular size, PAPs
USA, [12]TV annuloplastysurgery and other
for functionalproceduresMVRep 276 patients (35%)No analysis of residual MR
Cohort studyregurgitation using
(level IIb)4 techniques:AVR 199 patients (25%)No analytical correlation between TR and
1. Carpentier–survival or progression of NYHA class
Edwards semi-rigidAVRep 15 patients (2%)
ringResidual TR in 14% of patients early after
2. Cosgrove–CABG 205 patients (265)operation
Edwards flexible
bandDistribution of patientsCarpentier: 139 patientsLate worsening (beyond 6 months)
3. De Vegaaccording to TV repair(17%)associated with patient disease factors
proceduretechniqueAND with avoidable causes such as trans-
4. Peri-GuardCosgrove: 291 patients (37%)tricuspid pacing leads and type of
annuloplastyannuloplasty
De Vega: 116 patients (15%)
2 non-ring annuloplasties, De Vega and
Peri-Guard: 243 patients (31%)Peri-Guard, worsening of TR.
Reoperation rateFreedom from reoperation
1 month: 99%
8 years: 97%
Progression to gradeCarpentier 3+: 10% - 10% -
3+ or 4+ TR according11% - 11% 4+: 5.2% - 5.5% -
to TV repair technique6% - 6% (P=0.7)
1 monthCosgrove 3+: 10% - 12% -
1 year12% - NA 4+: 5.3% - 6% - 6% - NA
5 years(P=0.05)
8 years
De Vega 3+: 9% - 12% - 17% -
20% 4+: 4.6 - 6% - 11% - 13%
(P=0.002)
Peri-Guard 3+: 10% - 13% -
19% - 22% 4+: 5.4% - 7% - 13% -
15% (P=0.0009)
Pacemaker leadPreop PMK Lead vs. No PMK
influence on 3+ and 4+Lead
TR prevalence
16% - 42% vs. 15% - 23%
(1 month–5 years)
Preop TR influence of9% - 14% - 22% at 1 month
late TR development
(Prevalence of 3+ or18% - 23% - 29% at 5 years
4+)
1. grades 0 vs. 1+
2. 2+ vs. 3+
3. vs. 4+
Risk factors for late TRLV dysfunction (P=0.0002)
worseningOne-system disease (P=0.007)
AF (P=0.01) PMK lead
(P=0.04)
Tang et al.,Between 1978 andFollow-up duration5.9±4.9 years (rangeMajority of patients undergoing TV repair
(2006), Circulation,2003, 702 patients0–21 years)have secondary (‘functional’) regurgitation
Canada, [13]underwent TV
repair in the settingTR repairDe Vega procedure 493Uncorrected moderate and severe TR may
Retrospectiveof concomitantpatientspersist or even worsen after mitral valve
study (level IIb)left-sided valvesurgery
surgery and‘Ring’ annuloplasty 209 patients:
revascularizationCarpentier n. 114 (54%)Annuloplasty ring refers significant
Duran n. 52 (25%)improvement over De Vega repair in long-
Cosgrove n. 43 (21%)term survival and event-free survival, as
well as recurrence of TR
Functional classRing vs. non ring TV repair
NYHA III–IV 20% vs. 25%Beneficial effects of a TV annuloplasty
ring were independent of the type of
Late TRRing group No TR 15%mitral valve surgery performed
Trivial-to-mild TR 55%
Moderate-to-severe TR 30%Recurrence of TR was not significantly
associated with the recurrence of MR
Non-ring group No TR 10%
Trivial-to-mild TR 54%
Moderate-to-severe TR 36%
OutcomesNo ring vs. ring (15 years)
Freedom from TR 39±11% vs.
82±5% (P=0.003)
Long-term survival 36±8% vs.
49±5% (P=0.007)
Event-free survival 17±6%
vs. 34±5%
PredictorsAnnuloplasty ring
Long-term survival (HR 0.7;
P=0.03)
Event-free survival (HR 0.8;
P=0.04)
Kim et al.,From JanuaryDistribution of patientsCarpentier: 139 patients (17%)Retrospective study
(2005),1994 to Decemberaccording to TV repair
Circulation,1997, 170 patientstechniqueCosgrove: 291 patients (37%)Long follow-up
Korea, [14]underwent left-
side valve surgeryDe Vega: 116 patients (15%)Tricuspid repair techniques used are also
Retrospectiveand MAZE (Coxknown to be burden by high late TR
studyIII) operation forPeri-Guard: 243 patients (31%)recurrence
(level IIb)AF Group I 44
patients in sinusReoperation rateFreedom from reoperationAF affects the worsening of TR over time
rhythm; Group II1 month: 99%
48 patients in AF8 years: 97%MAZE can prevent this course
with MAZE and
Group III 78Preoperative TR gradeGroup I 12 patients (27.3%)Recovery and maintenance of atrial
patients withoutGroup II 8 patients (16.7%)mechanical activity are of great value for
MAZEGroup III 26 patients (33.3%)such a benefit
Progression of TR atImmediate results (significant
follow-upTR) Group I 3 patients
(6.8%) Group II 1 pt (2.1%)
Group III 11 patients (14.1%)
P=NS among groups
Post-op results (significant TR)
Group I 3/41 patients
(7.3%) Group II 6/47 pt (12.8%)
Group III 26/67 patients (38.8%)
P=0.001 Group I vs. Group III
P=0.005 Group II vs. Group III
Atrial contractilityGroup II (+MAZE) 38 patients
contribution andof Group II maintained sinus
analysisrhythm (Group IIa) 10 patients
with no LA mechanical activity
(AF, accelerated junctional
rhythm, sinus rhythm)
Group IIa had smaller
LA size preoperatively and
lower TR grade at the final
follow-up than those in Group IIb
(P=0.038; P=0.025)
Left-side valve surgeryMVR/MVRep 174 patients
(51.9%)
AV surgery alone 74 patients
(22.1%)
Combined MV+AV surgery
87 patients (4.5%) MVR/MVRep
174 patients (51.9%)
AV surgery alone 74 patients
(22.1%)
Combined MV+AV surgery
87 patients (4.5%)
TV surgery andAnnuloplasty 15 patients (4.5%)
technique
TR developmentSignificant: 90 patients (26.9%)
Severe in 25 patients (7.5%)
TR population and riskAge (47.6±13.4 vs. 44.3±13.2
factors (TR+ vs. TR-)years, P=0.04)
Preop AF (83.3 vs. 46.5%,
P<0.001)
LA dimension (56.9±13.2
vs. 52.4 ±11.5 mm, P=0.006)
Prior valve surgery (40.0 vs.
25.3%, P=0.01).
Event-free survivalTR- group
at 100, 140, 160 and97.0±1.1%
175 months87.7±2.8%
85.9±2.6%
85.9±2.6%
TR+ group
94.4±2.4%
86.2±3.7%
70.9±5.9%
62.0±9.8%
P=0.03
Jonjev et al.,From July 1994Follow-up durationMean 42 months (rangeIn end-stage heart disease and selected
(2007), J Cardto July 2004,1–120 months)patient population the RADO procedure is
Surg, Serbia and226 of 294effective
Montenegro, [16]patients whoFunctional statusPreopertative NYHA class III
underwent surgical70 patients (39.88%)Concomitant reduction of mitral and
Prospectiveintervention forNYHA class IV 126 patientstricuspid insufficiency provides early and
study (level IIb)chronic ischemic(69.02%) mean NYHA classlong-term beneficial effect, according with
mitral3.9the natural history of the disease
regurgitation
had reductiveSurgical procedureMitral valve surgeryNo data are provided about the long-term
annuloplasty ofefficacy of De Vega annuloplasty for the
double orificesCarpentier mitral ringprevention of late TR development
(RADO)37 patients (16.38%)
Semicircular posterior annuloplasty
189 patients (69.02%)
TV surgery
De Vega annuloplasty
226 patients (100%)
Follow-upMean NYHA class 1.9 mean
EF preoperative 25% to
postoperative 34%
RADO resultsMitral valve insufficiency
mean grade 3.7±0.4
preoperative to 0.7±0.3
postoperative
TV insufficiency mean grade
3.4±0.4 preoperative to
0.9±0.2 prostoperative
Survival5 years–10 years
61.5±4.0% – 38.05±8.0%
Freedom fromAt 10 years 60.0±6.7%
decompensation
De Bonis et al.,Ninety-one DCMFollow-up1.8±1.2 years (range 0.5–5.7Retrospective study
(2008), Eur Jpatients (mean ageyears)
Cardiothorac Surg,61±11.3)No consistent, accurate data were available
Italy, [17]submitted to MVLeft-sided surgeryEdge-to-edge+undersizedpreoperatively and at follow-up regarding
repair (±tricuspidand concomitantannuloplasty 46 patientsright atrial dimension, tricuspid annular size
Cohort studyrepair) forprocedures(50.5%) undersizedand degree of leaflet tethering
(level IIb)functional MRannuloplasty 45 patients (49.4%)
Small number of patients included
CABG 41 patients (45%)
uncorrected moderate or less TR in patients
AF surgery 14 patients (15.3%)with functional MR often persist and
worsen over time
TV surgical13 patients (3+/4+ or
intervention>TR) had TV annuloplasty:Annular dilatation and tethering as
underlying mechanisms of late TR
De Vega Procedure: 7 patients
Ring annuloplasty:RV function assessment is essential to
6 patientsguide the surgical intervention
No TV annuloplasty: 78 patientsAbsence of ‘reverse remodelling’ influences
(with TR<2+/4+)late TR development
Evolution of fTRAbsent/mild 52 patients (57.1%)
Moderate 28 patients (30.7%)
Moderately severe 9 patients
(9.8%)
Severe 2 patients (2.2%)
11 of 91 patients (12%) had
progression of TR
14 of the 78 patients (17.9%)
no-TR had worsening of TR at
least of 2 grades
TR evolutionAnnular dilatation in 75 patients
mechanismstethering in 6 patients
Predictors of significantRV dilatation (OR 8.3, P=0.009)
late TR
Pre-op. RV dysfunction (OR
13.7, P=0.0001)
TR grade at discharge (OR 5.4,
P=0.01)
PulmonarySignificant (>3+) TR at
hypertensionfollow-up:
37% (9/24) among the patients
with pulmonary hypertension
3% (2/67) among those with
SPAP <40 mmHg at the last
echocardiogram
(P<0.0001)
Pattern of LV‘reverse remodeling’ group:
remodelingSignificant TR in only 1 of 49
patients (2%) that demonstrated
reverse remodeling
No ‘reverse remodeling group’
significant TR in 10 of 42
patients (23.8%)
(P=0.04)

fMR, functional mitral regurgitation; MVRep, mitral valve repair; FTR, functional tricuspid regurgitation; TVRep, tricuspid valve repair; PMK, pacemaker; TTE, trans-thoracic echocardiography; TA, tricuspid annulus; MR, mitral regurgitation; AVR, aortic valve replacement; AVRep, aortic valve repair; AV, aortic valve; HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio.

6. Results

In 1999, Turina et al. [2] reported that significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) requiring TV surgery predicts poor survival in patients undergoing valve surgery.

Nath et al. [3] found that the survival rate at one year changes significantly in moderate and severe TR groups. Moderate and severe TR increases the mortality regardless of PASP degree and ejection fraction.

Porter et al. [4] outlined that among patients who underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) without TV surgery, 44 (67%) developed late TR (moderate to severe in 34 patients, 77.4%).

Matsuyama et al. [5] analyzed the outcome of 174 patients that did not receive TV surgery at the time of intervention. Despite a low percentage in the early postoperative period, 28 patients (16%) developed a TR grade of 3+ or more and, out of those with preoperative TR 2+/4+, a progression was observed in 17 patients (37%). Early postoperative TR grade is unreliable for estimation of TR progression.

In their series of 124 patients with functional mitral regurgitation (fMR) who underwent CABG and mitral valve repair (MVRep), Matsunaga et al. [6] found no difference in early postoperative TR among corrected-TR and uncorrected-TR groups, but at the last follow-up, 34 patients (49%) had significant TR. The incidence of TR increased from 25% at <1 year to 53% between 1 and 3 years and 74% at >3 years.

In the analysis of Calafiore et al. [7], fTR progression is not related to MVR progression and untreated moderate or more functional TR can impair both mid-term survival and functional status, as outlined by the study of Boyaci et al. [8].

Recently, Song et al. [9] found that TV annulus size tends to increase over time in either corrected or uncorrected TR. Rheumatic aetiology of mitral valve (MV) disease is also associated with development of significant late TR (15% vs. 5%, P=0.017).

In the series of Colombo et al. [10], 50 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery had their TV corrected if the indexed tricuspid annulus dimension was ≥21 mm/m2. At follow-up, 83.9% of patients who underwent tricuspid procedure had absent or mild and mild-to-moderate TR.

In 2005, Dreyfus et al. [11] reported a series of 148 patients where an intra-operative TV annular diameter [tricuspid annulus (TA)] ≥70 mm was used as criterion for repair, regardless of the preoperative TR grade (equivalent to 4 cm by echocardiography [A. Berrebi, personal communication, November 2006]). TR increased more than two grades in 48% of patients in the no-TV repair group and only in 2% of the MVR+TVRep group. No correlation has been found between preoperative TA dilatation and regurgitation grade.

In 2004, McCarthy et al. [12] analyzed 790 patients who had TV repair using two ‘ring’ (Carpentier–Edwards, Edwards flexible band) or two ‘non-ring’ techniques (De Vega–Peri-Guard). Freedom from re-operation was 97% at follow-up. TR severity was stable across time with Carpentier–Edwards ring (P=0.7), increased slowly with Cosgrove–Edwards band (P=0.05), but rose more rapidly with the De Vega (P=0.002) and Peri-Guard (P=0.0009) approach. The ‘non-ring’ annuloplasties showed to be ineffective in preventing late TR development. Presence of pacemaker (PMK) leads were also identified as a risk factor (42% at 5 years).

Significant improvement with ‘ring’ annuloplasty over the De Vega technique in terms of long-term survival, event-free survival and recurrence of TR has been confirmed by Tang et al. [13]; furthermore, the beneficial effects are independent of the type of the MV surgery performed.

Kim et al. [14] outlined that when AF persists after surgery for left-sided valve or when the left atrium mechanical activity is not restored, progression to high grade TR occurs.

A recent paper from Kwak et al. [15] reported that 90 patients (26.9%) of 335 with no preoperative TR, undergoing left-sided valve surgery, developed de novo significant TR. Preoperative AF was found to independently contribute to late TR.

In the setting of end-stage heart disease, the group of Jonjev et al. [16] outlined that reductive annuloplasty of mitral and TV is an effective procedure with early and long-term beneficial effects on survival, freedom from hospitalization and improvement of functional class.

Of 91 patients with dilatative cardiomyopathy submitted to MV repair, De Bonis et al. [17] found that, among those who did not have TR repair, TR worsening of at least 2 grades occurred. Right ventricle dilatation, preoperative RV dysfunction and TR grade at discharge were strong predictors of late significant TR development. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) was also associated with significant TR (grade 3+or more) at follow-up. The absence of ‘reverse remodelling’ occurred in a significant percentage of patients with late TR (10 patients; 23.8% P=0.04).

7. Clinical bottom line

TV insufficiency should be treated during left-sided valve surgery when TR annulus is dilated (≥21 mm/m2; >70 mm intra-operatively; ≥3.5 cm at trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE) [18]) regardless of the absolute grade of regurgitation, in cases of preoperative AF, trans-tricuspid PMK lead and underlying rheumatic disease. Also, ‘ring’ annuloplasty techniques should be preferred over the ‘non-ring’ techniques.

References

1
Dunning
J
Prendergast
B
Mackway-Jones
K
,
Towards evidence-based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg
,
2003
, vol.
4
(pg.
405
-
409
)
2
Turina
J
Stark
T
Seifert
B
Turina
M
,
Predictors of the long-term outcome after combined aortic and mitral valve surgery
Circulation
,
1999
, vol.
100
19 Suppl
(pg.
II48
-
II53
)
3
Nath
J
Foster
E
Heidenreich
PA
,
Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on long-term survival
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2004
, vol.
3
(pg.
405
-
409
)
4
Porter
A
Shapira
Y
Wurzel
M
Sulkes
J
Vaturi
M
Adler
Y
Sahar
G
Sagie
A
,
Tricuspid regurgitation late after mitral valve replacement: clinical and echocardiographic evaluation
J Heart Valve Dis
,
1999
, vol.
1
(pg.
57
-
62
)
5
Matsuyama
K
Matsumoto
M
Sugita
T
Nishizawa
J
Tokuda
Y
Matsuo
T
,
Predictors of residual tricuspid regurgitation after mitral valve surgery
Ann Thorac Surg
,
2003
, vol.
6
(pg.
1826
-
1828
)
6
Matsunaga
A
Duran
CMG
,
Progression of tricuspid regurgitation after repaired functional ischemic mitral regurgitation
Circulation
,
2005
, vol.
112
9 Suppl
(pg.
I453
-
I457
)
7
Calafiore
AM
Gallina
S
Iacò
AL
Contini
M
Bivona
A
Gagliardi
M
Bosco
P
Di Mauro
M
,
Mitral valve surgery for functional mitral regurgitation: should moderate-or-more tricuspid regurgitation be treated? a propensity score analysis
Ann Thorac Surg
,
2009
, vol.
3
(pg.
698
-
703
)
8
Boyaci
A
Gokce
V
Topaloglu
S
Korkmaz
S
Goksel
S
,
Outcome of significant functional tricuspid regurgitation late after mitral valve replacement for predominant rheumatic mitral stenosis
Angiology
,
2007
, vol.
3
(pg.
336
-
342
)
9
Song
H
Kim
MJ
Chung
CH
Choo
SJ
Song
MG
Song
JM
Kang
DH
Lee
JW
Song
JK
,
Factors associated with development of late significant tricuspid regurgitation after successful left-sided valve surgery
Heart
,
2009
, vol.
11
(pg.
931
-
936
)
10
Colombo
T
Russo
C
Ciliberto
GR
Lanfranconi
M
Bruschi
G
Agati
S
Vitali
E
,
Tricuspid regurgitation secondary to mitral valve disease: tricuspid annulus function as guide to tricuspid valve repair
Cardiovasc Surg
,
2001
, vol.
4
(pg.
369
-
377
)
11
Dreyfus
GD
Corbi
PJ
Chan
KMJ
Bahrami
T
,
Secondary tricuspid regurgitation or dilatation: which should be the criteria for surgical repair
Ann Thorac Surg
,
2005
, vol.
1
(pg.
127
-
132
)
12
McCarthy
PM
Bhudia
SK
Rajeswaran
J
Hoercher
KJ
Lytle
BW
Cosgrove
DM
Blackstone
EH
,
Tricuspid valve repair: durability and risk factors for failure
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
,
2004
, vol.
3
(pg.
674
-
685
)
13
Tang
GHL
David
TE
Singh
SK
Maganti
MD
Armstrong
S
Borger
MA
,
Tricuspid valve repair with an annuloplasty ring results in improved long-term outcomes
Circulation
,
2006
, vol.
114
1 Suppl
(pg.
I577
-
I581
)
14
Kim
HK
Kim
YJ
Kim
KI
Jo
SH
Kim
KB
Ahn
H
Sohn
DW
Oh
BH
Lee
MM
Park
YB
Choi
YS
,
Impact of the Maze operation combined with left-sided valve surgery on the change in tricuspid regurgitation over time
Circulation
,
2005
, vol.
112
9 Suppl
(pg.
I14
-
I19
)
15
Kwak
JJ
Kim
YJ
Kim
MK
Kim
HK
Park
JS
Kim
KH
Kim
KB
Ahn
H
Sohn
DW
Oh
BH
Park
YB
,
Development of tricuspid regurgitation late after left-sided valve surgery: a single-center experience with long-term echocardiographic examinations
Am Heart J
,
2008
, vol.
115
(pg.
732
-
737
)
16
Jonjev
ZS
Mijatov
M
Fabri
M
Popović
S
Radovanović
ND
,
Systematic reductive annuloplasty of the mitral and tricuspid valves in patients with end-stage ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy
J Card Surg
,
2007
Apr
, vol.
2
(pg.
111
-
116
)
17
De Bonis
M
Lapenna
E
Sorrentino
F
La Canna
G
Grimaldi
A
Maisano
F
Torracca
L
Alfieri
O
,
Evolution of tricuspid regurgitation after mitral valve repair for functional mitral regurgitation in dilated cardiomyopathy
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
,
2008
, vol.
4
(pg.
600
-
606
)
18
Shiran
A
Sagie
A
,
Tricuspid regurgitation in mitral valve disease incidence, prognostic implications, mechanism, and management
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2009
, vol.
5
(pg.
401
-
408
)