We have read with great interest the article by Gossot et al. reporting the totally thoracoscopic approach for pulmonary anatomic segmentectomies [1]. Concerning the inclusion criteria in the planning treatment for single pulmonary metastasis reported by the authors themselves in nine cases, we have a point for interactive discussion. Despite high resolution computed tomography scan and positron emission tomography-computed tomography remain the preferred imaging modalities for pulmonary metastases, the sensitivity of the technique is 100% for lesions larger than 1 cm, but it decreases according to the size of the metastases (<5 mm). Indeed, as we have yet demonstrated, there is a real problem of missing small metastatic lesions in the video-assisted thoracic surgery approach [2]; moreover, the necessity of a second or third re-resection for recurrent metastases was reported [3]. In conclusion complete manual exploration by axillary-thoracotomy remains the procedure of choice for patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy, because of limitation in preoperative radiological assessment of lung lesions smaller than 5 mm.

References

1
Gossot
D
Ramos
R
Brian
E
Raynaud
C
Girard
P
Strauss
C
,
A totally thoracoscopic approach for pulmonary anatomic segmentectomies
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg
,
2011
, vol.
12
(pg.
529
-
533
)
2
Margaritora
S
Porziella
V
D’Andrilli
A
Cesario
A
Galetta
D
Macis
G
Granone
P
,
Pulmonary metastases: can accurate radiological evaluation avoid thoracotomic approach?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
,
2002
, vol.
21
(pg.
1111
-
1114
)
3
Maeda
R
Isowa
N
Onuma
H
Miura
H
Harada
T
Touge
H
Tokuyasu
H
Kawasaki
Y
,
Pulmonary resection for metastases from colorectal carcinoma
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg
,
2009
, vol.
9
(pg.
640
-
644
)