Issue navigation
Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998
PART I: THE PRACTICE OF SPERM DONATION TODAY
Semen characteristics and fertility tests required for storage of spermatozoa
C.L.R. Barratt and others
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.1
Discussion: Semen characteristics and fertility required for storage of spermatozoa
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 8–11, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.8
Screening of semen donors for infectious diseases
Corinne A. Liesnard
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 12–24, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.12
Is matching between women and donors feasible to avoid cytomegalovirus infection in artificial insemination with donor semen?
C.A. Liesnard and others
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 25–31, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.25
Discussion: Screening for infectious diseases
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 32–34, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.32
Multicentre approaches to donor insemination in the French CECOS Federation: Nationwide evaluation, donor matching, screening for genetic diseases and consanguinity
Dominique Le Lannou and others
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 35–49, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.35
Discussion: Multicentre approaches to donor insemination in the French CECOS Federation
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 50–54, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.50
Current status of semen banking in the USA
John K. Critser
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 55–67, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.55
Discussion: Sperm banking in the USA
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 68–69, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.68
Recruitment and counselling of sperm donors: ethical problems
Françoise Shenfield
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 70–75, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.70
Discussion: Donor counselling and selection
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 76–79, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.76
Legal and ethical responsibilities of gamete banks
Ruth Deech
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 80–83, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.80
Discussion: Legal and ethical responsibilities
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 84–89, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.84
PART II: THE PRACTICE OF OOCYTE DONATION TODAY
Oocyte donation: particular technical and ethical aspects
Y. Englert and I. Govaerts
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 90–97, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.90
Oocyte donation: the legislative framework in Western Europe
Jennifer Gunning
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 98–102, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.98
Discussion: Oocyte donation
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 103–104, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.103
PART III: CURRENT EUROPEAN LAWS ON GAMETE DONATION
Introduction and warning
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Page 105, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.105
LAWS
Austria
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 105–106, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.105-a
Denmark
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 106–108, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.106
France
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 108–120, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.108
Germany
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 120–121, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.120
Israel
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 121–122, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.121
Norway
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 122–126, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.122
Portugal
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Page 126, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.126
Spain
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 126–130, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.126-a
Sweden
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 130–132, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.130
Switzerland
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 132–133, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.132
United Kingdom
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 133–134, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.133
INDEXES
Subject index
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages 135–137, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.135
PREFACE
Preface and Corsendonk Consensus Statements
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Page v, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.v
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
List of participants – Paris, 1993 and Corsendonk, 1996
Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue suppl_2, 1 May 1998, Pages x–xii, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.x
Advertisement intended for healthcare professionals
Advertisement intended for healthcare professionals