P–612 Transdermal testosterone vs. Placebo (lubricant gel) pre-treatment in improving IVF outcomes in diminished ovarian reserve patients (POSEIDON group 3 and 4): a randomised controlled trial Free

To compare the efficacy of transdermal testosterone with placebo (lubricant gel) in improving IVF outcomes using GnRH antagonist protocol in POSEIDON group 3 and 4 patients.

Patients receiving pre-treatment with testosterone gel had higher mean number of oocytes retrieved and grade A embryos as compared to the patients receiving lubricant gel.

Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is associated with suboptimal ovarian response, higher cycle cancellation rate and lower clinical pregnancy rate following IVF cycles. Various treatment regimens have been devised for management of such patients and use of adjuvants in the form of oral or transdermal androgen is one of them. Androgens improves follicular response to gonadotropin stimulation as well as increase FSH receptor expression in granulosa cells, in turn leading to better oocyte yield and pregnancy rate. Aim was to compare the effect of transdermal testosterone gel with placebo gel on ART outcome in DOR patients (POSEIDON Group 3 and 4).

A prospective, randomised controlled trial was carried out from 1st September 2019 to 31st October 2020 at a tertiary infertility centre in India. 50 patients fulfilling the criteria of Group 3 and Group 4 of POSEIDON classification were included in the study. Patients with endocrine disorders (thyroid, prolactin), endometrioma, history of surgery on the ovaries, sensitivity to testosterone gel, male factor infertility and deranged liver and renal function tests were excluded.

Enrolled patients were randomised into two groups of 25 patients each, one group was pretreated (TTG group) with transdermal testosterone gel, 12.5 mg/day from day 6th of previous cycle to day 2nd of stimulation cycle while patients in other group took lubricant gel for the same duration before stimulation with GnRH antagonist fixed protocol followed by fresh Day 3 transfer.

The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. The primary outcome measures were the number of oocytes retrieved and number of grade A embryos formed (according to Istanbul consensus). The secondary outcome measures were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and ongoing pregnancy rate. The mean number of oocytes retrieved in TTG group was 5±1.02 which was significantly higher than placebo group–3.5±1.2, (p < 0.001). The mean number of Grade A embryos were also significantly higher (4.78±0.54 vs 3.00±0.23, p < 0.001) in TTG group. The TTG group had higher implantation rate (28% vs 20%, p = 0.49), clinical pregnancy rate (32% vs 18%, p = 0.41), ongoing pregnancy rate (32% vs 16%, p = 0.38) and lower miscarriage rate (0% vs 20%, p = 0.38), however, these differences were not statistically significant.

The study was done at a single centre with small sample size, replication with more subjects and in different centers is needed.

Wider implications of the findings: Pre-treatment with testosterone gel in DOR patients improves ovarian response to stimulation and results in higher number of oocytes retrieved and good quality embryos resulting in improved clinical pregnancy rates. Transdermal testosterone is advantageous because of better bioavailability, easy application, patient friendly and less adverse effects.

MCDH/2019/54