Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Is there a difference in testicular function in early adulthood between men born with cryptorchidism and men born with normally descended testes?

SUMMARY ANSWER

In men from the general population, a history of cryptorchidism was associated with lower total testis volume and impaired semen quality as well as altered serum levels of reproductive hormones.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The association between cryptorchidism and testicular function is well documented in studies based on sub-fertile or infertile men recruited from a clinical setting. However, the association has not previously been investigated in men from the general population, who were unselected regarding fertility status.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This is a cross-sectional population-based study of 6376 young Danish men examined from 1996 to 2017.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

This study is based on young men from the greater Copenhagen area, Denmark (median age of 19 years) who were unselected regarding fertility status and semen quality. The young men delivered a semen sample, had a blood sample drawn and underwent a physical examination including assessment of testis volume. Participants completed a questionnaire regarding cryptorchidism at birth, current lifestyle and their mother’s pregnancy, after consulting their mother. The differences in markers of testicular function, including testis volume, semen parameters and reproductive hormones between men with and without a history of cryptorchidism were investigated with multiple linear regression analyses.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The participation rate was 24% for the entire study period. Overall, a history of cryptorchidism was associated with reduced testicular function. In the adjusted models, a history of cryptorchidism was associated with a 3.5 ml lower total testis volume, determined by orchidometer (P <0.001), 28% lower sperm concentration (95% CI: −37 to −20) and 26% lower inhibin B/FSH ratio (95% CI: −50 to −22) compared to men without a history of cryptorchidism, suggesting a reduced spermatogenetic capacity. Men with a history of cryptorchidism also had a slightly reduced Leydig cell function expressed as a 6% lower testosterone/LH ratio (95% CI: −12 to −0.7). The significant effect sizes and different markers of testicular function pointing in the same direction across the different models based on a large sample size support that the results are not chance findings.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Information on cryptorchidism at birth and treatment modus was obtained by retrospective self-report, and each participant only delivered one semen sample.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The results suggest that men with a history of cryptorchidism could be at increased risk of experiencing fertility problems. However, among these men there is a wide variation in semen quality and further research is needed in order to identify the subgroup of boys born with cryptorchidism who are at the greatest risk of impaired semen quality when reaching adulthood.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study received financial support from the Research fund of Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital; the European Union (Contract numbers BMH4-CT96-0314, QLK4-CT-1999-01422, QLK4-CT-2002-00603. FP7/2007-2013, DEER Grant agreement no. 212844); the Danish Ministry of Health; the Danish Environmental Protection Agency; A.P. Møller and wife Chastine McKinney Møllers Foundation; and Svend Andersens Foundation. None of the founders had any role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, writing of the paper or publication decisions. The authors have nothing to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Introduction

Cryptorchidism, also known as undescended or maldescended testes, is one of the most common birth defects in newborn boys with a prevalence between 2.4% and 9.0% (Boisen et al., 2004; Cortes et al., 2008; Fawzy et al., 2015). The condition is considered a risk factor for infertility and testicular cancer (Hutson et al., 2010). In infertile men, ∼10% have a history of cryptorchidism and paternity rates are ∼30% lower in formerly bilateral cryptorchid men compared to men without a history of cryptorchidism (Mieusset et al., 1995; Lee and Coughlin, 2001; Paasch et al., 2004). Men with a history of cryptorchidism have a 3.7–7.5 higher risk of developing testicular cancer (Taran and Elder, 2006). It has been proposed that cryptorchidism is part of the testicular dysgenesis syndrome, which also includes hypospadias, testicular cancer and impaired spermatogenesis (Skakkebæk et al., 2001). These conditions, except isolated hypospadias, are associated with reduced fecundity and they are thought to have a common origin in prenatal testicular maldevelopment, which could be caused by environmental factors and maternal lifestyle (Virtanen et al., 2007; Skakkebaek et al., 2016).

Cryptorchidism has consistently been associated with impaired testicular function in adulthood although there is conflicting evidence as to which parameters are affected (Paasch et al., 2004; van Brakel et al., 2013). Overall, studies find that a history of cryptorchidism is associated with a reduction in sperm concentration and testis volume (de Gouveia Brazao et al., 2003; van Brakel et al., 2014; Hart et al., 2015). The association between cryptorchidism and reproductive hormones is well documented in men presenting to fertility and andrology clinics (Andersson et al., 2004; Paasch et al., 2004; Rohayem et al., 2017), and in men who underwent orchiopexy during childhood (Lee and Coughlin, 2001; Moretti et al., 2006). Especially lower levels of inhibin B and higher levels of FSH are found among men with a history of cryptorchidism, suggesting a reduced Sertoli cell function (Lee and Coughlin, 2001; de Gouveia Brazao et al., 2003), whereas other studies find no such association (van Brakel et al., 2013; Hart et al., 2015). It has also been suggested that men with bilateral cryptorchidism have a lower testicular function compared to men with unilateral cryptorchidism (Lee and Coughlin, 2001; Moretti et al., 2006; Trsinar and Muravec, 2009) and that increasing age at time of treatment is associated with decreased testicular function (Hadziselimovic, 2006; Canavese et al., 2009; Feyles et al., 2014).

To date, current knowledge of the potential impact of cryptorchidism on testicular function in adult life is either based on studies of sub-fertile or infertile men recruited from a clinical setting where the cause of infertility might not be limited to cryptorchidism or based on small-scale studies including men who underwent orchiopexy during childhood, implying the inclusion of only the most severe cases of cryptorchidism. Thus, the association between cryptorchidism and testicular function in the general population has not yet been investigated.

Therefore, in this cross-sectional study, we examined the association between congenital cryptorchidism and testicular function in early adulthood, including testis volume, semen parameters and reproductive hormones, based on data from more than 6000 young Danish men from the general population.

Materials and methods

Subjects/study population

In Denmark, all 18-year-old men, except those suffering from severe or chronic diseases (10–14%), are required to attend a compulsory physical examination in order to determine their fitness for military service (Jensen et al., 2007). The conscripts, considered representative of the general population, were approached on the day of the compulsory physical examination and invited to participate in our study regardless of being found fit for military service or not.

Between 1996 and 2017, a total of 7387 men returned an informed consent form and were examined at the Department of Growth and Reproduction at Copenhagen University Hospital, giving an overall participation rate of 24% (Priskorn et al., 2018). A detailed description of the study has been published previously (Jørgensen et al., 2012). In total, 1006 men were excluded due to the following reasons: missing data (n = 181), the participant responding ‘don’t know’ to the question relating to being born with cryptorchidism (n = 795), or a current or previous use of anabolic steroids (n = 30). This left 6376 men eligible for data analysis in this study. In general, the excluded men did not differ from the total study population regarding basic person-related characteristics or testicular function (Supplementary Table SI). On the day of the physical examination, participants delivered their completed questionnaire, provided a semen sample and had a blood sample drawn.

Questionnaire

All participants (1996–2017) completed a health and lifestyle questionnaire prior to the physical examination and all responses were reviewed by an interviewer to minimize missing data and ambiguous information. The questionnaire included items relating to cryptorchidism including whether they were born with both testes in the scrotum, and those answering yes were further asked whether they received hormonal or surgical treatment or whether descent of their testis were spontaneous. Additionally, questions were added to the questionnaire (2002–2017) including which testis (left, right or both) was affected, and in that period cryptorchidism cases were categorized into unilateral or bilateral.

The questionnaire also included question relating to their mothers smoking status during the index pregnancy relating to the participant, whether they were born preterm (<37 gestational week), their birthweight and their own smoking status. Participants were encouraged to consult their mother regarding questions relating to pregnancy and neonatal factors. The questionnaire has undergone minor alterations during the study period. In 2002, the question regarding cryptorchidism was slightly rephrased, and in 2012, the questionnaire was updated from a paper-based to a computerized version.

Physical examination including assessment of testis volume

The physical examination included assessment of the testis volume by ultrasound and orchidometer. For both measures, total testis volume was calculated as the sum of the left and right testis volume. In total, 11 men had only one testis and the volume of the remaining testis was included as the total volume. The total testis volume could not be calculated for 38 men due to lack of information on the volume of one of the testes. Body weight and height were measured and BMI was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m2).

Semen analysis

A semen sample was produced by masturbation in a room close to the semen laboratory and the sample was kept at 37°C until analysis. The men had been asked to keep an ejaculation abstinence time of minimum 48 h, however, men who did not comply were still included. For all men, the time between previous and current ejaculation was calculated (h). Semen analysis was conducted in accordance with guidelines from the WHO, as described in detail in Jørgensen et al. (World Health Organization, 2010; Jørgensen et al., 2012). In brief, semen volume (ml) was assessed by weighing (assuming 1 ml = 1 g) and sperm concentration (mill/ml) was assessed using a Bürker–Türk haemocytometer. Sperm motility (%) was determined by adding 10 µl of well-mixed semen sample on a glass slide and examined under microscope. The spermatozoa were classified as either progressive motile, locally motile or immotile. Sperm morphology (%) was assessed based on smears of the semen sample stained by Papanicolaou and evaluated in accordance to strict criteria as recommended by the WHO (Menkveld et al., 1990). All assessments were done in duplicates using the average value (Jørgensen et al., 2012). Total sperm count (millions) was calculated as sperm concentration × semen volume.

Reproductive hormone analyses

On the examination day, a blood sample was drawn from the cubical vein and centrifuged, and the serum isolated and frozen until assessment. FSH, LH, testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) were determined using a time-resolved immunofluorometric assay (DELFIA: Wallac Turku, Finland). From 2014 and onward, testosterone and SHBG levels were determined using ELISA (Access2, Beckman Coultier Ltd, High Wycombe, UK). Oestradiol was determined by radioimmunoassay (Pantex, Santa Monica, CA, USA) and inhibin B levels were determined using a specific two-sided enzyme immunometric assay (Serotec, UK). The reproductive hormones were analysed in batches with yearly reanalysis from previously analysed samples in order to ensure comparability of the hormone levels and in case of assay change a correction factor was established (Priskorn et al., 2016). Free testosterone was calculated based on the measured serum concentrations of total testosterone and SHBG and assuming a fixed albumin value according to Vermeulen et al., and ratios of testosterone/LH, free testosterone/LH and inhibin B/FSH were calculated (Vermeulen et al., 1999).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics (medians, 5–95 percentiles or frequencies) were calculated based on information from the questionnaire, the physical examination, semen samples and reproductive hormones for the total study population and stratified according to history of cryptorchidism. Additionally, using a subgroup of men with available information, descriptive statistics on the outcome variables were stratified according to unilateral or bilateral cases and mode of treatment (spontaneous descent, hormone treatment or orchiopexy). Differences between groups were tested by Pearson’s χ2 test for categorical variables and Mann–Whitney U-test for continuous variables. Men with and without a history of cryptorchidism were also classified according to semen quality using unadjusted values of sperm concentration, percentage of progressive sperm motility and percentage of normal sperm morphology. In accordance to Damsgaard et al. low semen quality was defined as sperm concentration <15 mill/ml, and/or progressive sperm motility <32% and/or sperm morphology <4%. High semen quality was defined as sperm concentration >40 mill/ml and progressive sperm motility >50% and sperm morphology >9%. All other men were categorized as having intermediate semen quality (Damsgaard et al., 2016). Semen quality was illustrated, and logistic regression was used to investigate the unadjusted odds of having low semen quality in cases versus controls.

Based on a linear regression analyses, the effect size and 95% CI for the association between cryptorchidism and markers of testicular function were calculated using a stepwise model building approach including three models. The first model was unadjusted. The second model included technical covariates to minimize intra- and inter-individual variation. In this model, total testis volume was adjusted for examination period (1996–2001, 2002–mid-2012 and mid-2012–2017) and age (years). All semen parameters were further adjusted for abstinence time (h) and progressive sperm motility was additionally adjusted for time between semen sampling and analysis (min). Reproductive hormones were adjusted for examination period, time of blood sampling (h and min), BMI (kg/m2), smoking (yes/no) and age (years). Model 3, was as for Model 2 but with further adjustments with birth weight (<2500 g, 2500–5000 g and >5000 g), prematurity (<37 gestational week) and maternal smoking during pregnancy (yes/no). The confounders selected for inclusion in Model 3 were based on a review of the literature. Participants with missing data were omitted from the analyses but multiple imputation was used to assess the robustness of the complete case analysis of Model 3, and to get efficient parameter estimates. The imputation was based on chained equations, implemented in the R package ‘mice’ (van Buuren and Groothuis-Oudshoorn, 2011). To minimize the variation from the imputation process, 50 imputations were used. The variance was calculated using Rubin’s rule (Rubin, 1987).

All analyses were repeated in subpopulations of men with information on unilateral versus bilateral cryptorchidism and course of treatment. In order to meet normality of residuals and homogeneity of variances, the outcome variables were transformed by cubic-root (total testis volume assessed by ultrasound, sperm concentration, total sperm count and semen volume), second potency (progressive sperm motility), square-root (sperm morphology) and natural logarithm (reproductive hormones). Total testis volume assessed by orchidometer entered the models untransformed. Finally, two sensitivity analyses were performed. The first was based on a logistic regression model using cut-off values according to the WHO’s reference values for low semen quality (Cooper et al., 2010) and the second included a selected population of men with normal birth weight, born at term and not exposed to maternal smoking during pregnancy in order to investigate the robustness of our results. We also repeated the linear regression models after excluding men with azoospermia, and for analyses of total testis volume after exclusion of the 11 men with only one testis.

Results of selected semen parameters and reproductive hormones were illustrated graphically and presented as the percentage difference between men with and without a history of cryptorchidism. Differences, CIs and P-values were calculated based on the fully adjusted model 3. As all reproductive hormones were ln-transformed, the β-estimates and 95% CIs were back-transformed to obtain the percentage difference. However, due to the different transformations used for the semen parameters, group differences cannot be directly compared. To obtain the percentage difference for semen parameters, we used Model 3 to calculate a median for semen parameters in all groups for a 19-year-old man with an abstinence time of 48 h, a time between semen sample and analysis of 30 min, not exposed in utero to maternal smoking, with normal birthweight, born at term and examined in the period 1996–2001, and then reported the ratios between group medians. Back-transformed CIs were calculated using the Delta Method (Casella and Berger, 2002).

All tests were two-tailed and results with a P-value <0.05 were regarded significant. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA® version 13.1 and imputation was performed in R (R Core Team, 2019).

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee (journal no. H-KF 289428) and all participants provided written informed consent.

Results

Basic characteristics

Characteristics of the total study population stratified according to history of cryptorchidism are presented in Table I. The median age and BMI were 19.0 years and 22.3 kg/m2, respectively, and 44.0% of men were occasional or daily smokers. The majority (93.4%) had no knowledge of their own fertility potential as they had never tried to achieve a pregnancy. A total of 570 (8.9%) men reported that they were born with cryptorchidism. In general, cases and controls were similar, but men with a history of cryptorchidism were more likely to have been exposed to maternal smoking during pregnancy and reported a lower birthweight (P < 0.001). In the total study population, the median sperm concentration was 44.5 mill/ml, total sperm count was 140 mill, percentage of progressive motile spermatozoa was 60% and morphologically normal spermatozoa was 6.5%. A higher percentage of men with a history of cryptorchidism had low semen quality with an odds ratio of 1.7 (95% CI: 1.5–2.1) compared to controls (Fig. 1).

Distribution of semen quality among young Danish men with and without a history of cryptorchidism. Men with and without a history of cryptorchidism were classified by semen quality using unadjusted values of sperm concentration, percentage of progressive sperm motility and percentage of normal sperm morphology, in accordance with Damsgaard et al. Low semen quality was defined as sperm concentration <15 mill/ml, and/or progressive sperm motility <32% and/or sperm morphology <4%. High semen quality was defined as sperm concentration >40 mill/ml and progressive sperm motility >50% and sperm morphology >9%. All other men were categorized as having intermediate semen quality (Damsgaard et al., 2016).
Figure 1.

Distribution of semen quality among young Danish men with and without a history of cryptorchidism. Men with and without a history of cryptorchidism were classified by semen quality using unadjusted values of sperm concentration, percentage of progressive sperm motility and percentage of normal sperm morphology, in accordance with Damsgaard et al. Low semen quality was defined as sperm concentration <15 mill/ml, and/or progressive sperm motility <32% and/or sperm morphology <4%. High semen quality was defined as sperm concentration >40 mill/ml and progressive sperm motility >50% and sperm morphology >9%. All other men were categorized as having intermediate semen quality (Damsgaard et al., 2016).

Table I

Characteristics of the total study population of Danish men from the general population examined from 1996 to 2017 and stratified according to cryptorchidism.

Total study population (n = 6376)
Cryptorchidism (n = 570)
No cryptorchidism (n = 5806)
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)/%Median (5–95 percentiles)/%Median (5–95 percentiles)/%P-valuea
Age (years)635819.0 (18.4–22.1)19.0 (18.5–21.8)19.0 (18.4–22.1)0.16
Height (m)63231.81 (1.71–1.92)1.81 (1.71–1.93)1.81 (1.71–1.92)0.49
Weight (kg)632173.5 (59.0–95.3)73.7 (57.8–99.4)73.5 (59.1–94.9)0.78
BMI (kg/m2)629222.3 (18.5–28.6)22.3 (18.3–30.2)22.3 (18.6–28.5)0.59
Alcohol recent week (units)622410 (0–37)10 (0–34)10 (0–38)0.30
Smokers*2668/606444.0%42.8%44.2%0.53
Ever had Sexual transmitted disease**318/63645.0%3.6%5.2%0.094
Unproven fertility5940/636093.4%93.2%93.4%0.87
Abstinence time (h)633361.7 (36.4–152.5)62.8 (37.7–156.6)61.6 (36.3–145.8)0.023
Maternal BMI before pregnancy (kg/m2)306420.9 (17.9–26.4)20.8 (17.7–26.0)20.9 (17.9–26.4)0.59
Maternal smoking during pregnancy1808/596730.3%38.4%29.5%<0.001
Born preterm***427/45869.3%10.8%9.1%0.22
Birthweight<0.001
 <2500 g320/50786.3%10.5%5.9%
 2500–5000 g4525/507889.1%86.8%89.3%
 >5000 g234/50784.6%2.3%4.8%
Total study population (n = 6376)
Cryptorchidism (n = 570)
No cryptorchidism (n = 5806)
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)/%Median (5–95 percentiles)/%Median (5–95 percentiles)/%P-valuea
Age (years)635819.0 (18.4–22.1)19.0 (18.5–21.8)19.0 (18.4–22.1)0.16
Height (m)63231.81 (1.71–1.92)1.81 (1.71–1.93)1.81 (1.71–1.92)0.49
Weight (kg)632173.5 (59.0–95.3)73.7 (57.8–99.4)73.5 (59.1–94.9)0.78
BMI (kg/m2)629222.3 (18.5–28.6)22.3 (18.3–30.2)22.3 (18.6–28.5)0.59
Alcohol recent week (units)622410 (0–37)10 (0–34)10 (0–38)0.30
Smokers*2668/606444.0%42.8%44.2%0.53
Ever had Sexual transmitted disease**318/63645.0%3.6%5.2%0.094
Unproven fertility5940/636093.4%93.2%93.4%0.87
Abstinence time (h)633361.7 (36.4–152.5)62.8 (37.7–156.6)61.6 (36.3–145.8)0.023
Maternal BMI before pregnancy (kg/m2)306420.9 (17.9–26.4)20.8 (17.7–26.0)20.9 (17.9–26.4)0.59
Maternal smoking during pregnancy1808/596730.3%38.4%29.5%<0.001
Born preterm***427/45869.3%10.8%9.1%0.22
Birthweight<0.001
 <2500 g320/50786.3%10.5%5.9%
 2500–5000 g4525/507889.1%86.8%89.3%
 >5000 g234/50784.6%2.3%4.8%

Data are presented as medians (5–95 percentiles) or frequencies and test-statistics (P-values). Values provided in bold indicate a significant result with a P-value <0.05.

a

Mann–Whitney U-test and Pearson’s χ2 test.

*

Combined daily and occasional smoking (yes/no).

**

Ever been diagnosed with either chlamydia or gonorrhoea (yes/no).

***

Less than 37 weeks of gestation.

Table I

Characteristics of the total study population of Danish men from the general population examined from 1996 to 2017 and stratified according to cryptorchidism.

Total study population (n = 6376)
Cryptorchidism (n = 570)
No cryptorchidism (n = 5806)
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)/%Median (5–95 percentiles)/%Median (5–95 percentiles)/%P-valuea
Age (years)635819.0 (18.4–22.1)19.0 (18.5–21.8)19.0 (18.4–22.1)0.16
Height (m)63231.81 (1.71–1.92)1.81 (1.71–1.93)1.81 (1.71–1.92)0.49
Weight (kg)632173.5 (59.0–95.3)73.7 (57.8–99.4)73.5 (59.1–94.9)0.78
BMI (kg/m2)629222.3 (18.5–28.6)22.3 (18.3–30.2)22.3 (18.6–28.5)0.59
Alcohol recent week (units)622410 (0–37)10 (0–34)10 (0–38)0.30
Smokers*2668/606444.0%42.8%44.2%0.53
Ever had Sexual transmitted disease**318/63645.0%3.6%5.2%0.094
Unproven fertility5940/636093.4%93.2%93.4%0.87
Abstinence time (h)633361.7 (36.4–152.5)62.8 (37.7–156.6)61.6 (36.3–145.8)0.023
Maternal BMI before pregnancy (kg/m2)306420.9 (17.9–26.4)20.8 (17.7–26.0)20.9 (17.9–26.4)0.59
Maternal smoking during pregnancy1808/596730.3%38.4%29.5%<0.001
Born preterm***427/45869.3%10.8%9.1%0.22
Birthweight<0.001
 <2500 g320/50786.3%10.5%5.9%
 2500–5000 g4525/507889.1%86.8%89.3%
 >5000 g234/50784.6%2.3%4.8%
Total study population (n = 6376)
Cryptorchidism (n = 570)
No cryptorchidism (n = 5806)
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)/%Median (5–95 percentiles)/%Median (5–95 percentiles)/%P-valuea
Age (years)635819.0 (18.4–22.1)19.0 (18.5–21.8)19.0 (18.4–22.1)0.16
Height (m)63231.81 (1.71–1.92)1.81 (1.71–1.93)1.81 (1.71–1.92)0.49
Weight (kg)632173.5 (59.0–95.3)73.7 (57.8–99.4)73.5 (59.1–94.9)0.78
BMI (kg/m2)629222.3 (18.5–28.6)22.3 (18.3–30.2)22.3 (18.6–28.5)0.59
Alcohol recent week (units)622410 (0–37)10 (0–34)10 (0–38)0.30
Smokers*2668/606444.0%42.8%44.2%0.53
Ever had Sexual transmitted disease**318/63645.0%3.6%5.2%0.094
Unproven fertility5940/636093.4%93.2%93.4%0.87
Abstinence time (h)633361.7 (36.4–152.5)62.8 (37.7–156.6)61.6 (36.3–145.8)0.023
Maternal BMI before pregnancy (kg/m2)306420.9 (17.9–26.4)20.8 (17.7–26.0)20.9 (17.9–26.4)0.59
Maternal smoking during pregnancy1808/596730.3%38.4%29.5%<0.001
Born preterm***427/45869.3%10.8%9.1%0.22
Birthweight<0.001
 <2500 g320/50786.3%10.5%5.9%
 2500–5000 g4525/507889.1%86.8%89.3%
 >5000 g234/50784.6%2.3%4.8%

Data are presented as medians (5–95 percentiles) or frequencies and test-statistics (P-values). Values provided in bold indicate a significant result with a P-value <0.05.

a

Mann–Whitney U-test and Pearson’s χ2 test.

*

Combined daily and occasional smoking (yes/no).

**

Ever been diagnosed with either chlamydia or gonorrhoea (yes/no).

***

Less than 37 weeks of gestation.

The association between cryptorchidism and semen parameters

Men with a history of cryptorchidism had significantly lower total testis volume compared to men without a history of cryptorchidism. In adjusted analyses, total testis volume assessed by orchidometer was 3.5 ml lower in men with cryptorchidism compared to controls (P <0.001) (Table II). The median sperm concentration was 32 mill/ml for cases compared to 45 mill/ml in controls, corresponding to a 28% lower sperm concentration after adjustment (95% CI: −37 to −20). The median sperm morphology was 5.5% and 6.5% for men with and without a history of cryptorchidism, respectively, corresponding to a 15% difference in the adjusted model (95% CI: −27 to −7) (Table II; Fig. 2a). In the unadjusted model, cryptorchidism was negatively associated with all semen parameters (all P <0.001), except for semen volume (Table II). After adjustment of technical covariates (Model 2), these associations remained significant (all P <0.001). When birth weight, prematurity and maternal smoking during pregnancy was added (Model 3), all associations remained significant except for sperm motility. The number of men included in this model was around 55% of the total population due to missing data on confounders. Results based on the total population (imputed data) confirm results based on the reduced population (Model 3) with available data of all outcomes apart from sperm motility (Tables II and IV). Sensitivity analysis in which men with azoospermia and men with only one testis were excluded did not attenuate the results (data not shown). Conclusions based on the results from logistic regression analyses were overall similar to those of the linear regression analysis (data not shown). Finally, results for the association between cryptorchidism and testicular function in a selected population of men with normal birth weight, born at term and not exposed to maternal smoking in utero were similar to those for the total study population (data not shown).

Selected markers of testicular function presented as the adjusted percentage difference and 95% CIs between men with and without a history of cryptorchidism. Differences in estimates, corresponding 95% CIs and P-values were calculated based on the adjusted Model 3. (a) All semen parameters were adjusted for examination period (1996–2001, 2002–mid-2012 and mid-2012–2017), age (years), abstinence time (h), birth weight (<2500 g, 2500–5000 g and >5000 g), prematurity (yes/no) and maternal smoking during pregnancy (yes/no). Sperm motility was additionally adjusted for time between semen sampling and analysis (min). (b) All reproductive hormones were adjusted for examination period (1996–2001, 2002–mid-2012 and mid-2012–2017), time of blood sampling (h and min), BMI (kg/m2), smoking status (yes/no), age (years), birth weight (<2500 g, 2500–5000 g and >5000 g), prematurity (yes/no) and maternal smoking during pregnancy (yes/no).
Figure 2.

Selected markers of testicular function presented as the adjusted percentage difference and 95% CIs between men with and without a history of cryptorchidism. Differences in estimates, corresponding 95% CIs and P-values were calculated based on the adjusted Model 3. (a) All semen parameters were adjusted for examination period (1996–2001, 2002–mid-2012 and mid-2012–2017), age (years), abstinence time (h), birth weight (<2500 g, 2500–5000 g and >5000 g), prematurity (yes/no) and maternal smoking during pregnancy (yes/no). Sperm motility was additionally adjusted for time between semen sampling and analysis (min). (b) All reproductive hormones were adjusted for examination period (1996–2001, 2002–mid-2012 and mid-2012–2017), time of blood sampling (h and min), BMI (kg/m2), smoking status (yes/no), age (years), birth weight (<2500 g, 2500–5000 g and >5000 g), prematurity (yes/no) and maternal smoking during pregnancy (yes/no).

Table II

Semen parameters in young Danish men with and without a history of cryptorchidism examined from 1996 to 2017.

Raw values
Unadjusted model 1
Adjusted model 2d
Adjusted model 3e
Adjusted model 3e with imputationf
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)
Total testis volume, Orchidometer (ml)62006200618435116376
 No cryptorchidism40 (26–56)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism38 (22–53)3.7 (<0.001)3.8 (<0.001)3.5 (<0.001)3.7 (<0.001)
Total testis volume, US (ml)a60816081606534456376
 No cryptorchidism28 (17–43)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism26 (15–41)0.085 (<0.001)0.097 (<0.001)0.071 (<0.001)0.092 (<0.001)
Semen volume (ml)a63506350631135826376
 No cryptorchidism3.2 (1.3–6.1)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism3.2 (1.4–6.0)0.003 (0.80)0.004 (0.71)0.001 (0.93)0.005 (0.604)
Sperm concentration (mill/ml)a63516351631235826376
 No cryptorchidism45 (4–161)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism32 (1–147)0.38 (<0.001)0.41 (<0.001)0.39 (<0.001)0.40 (<0.001)
Total sperm count (mill)a63446344630535796376
 No cryptorchidism143 (11–523)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism107 (1–451)0.55 (<0.001)0.59 (<0.001)0.56 (<0.001)0.57 (<0.001)
Progressive sperm motility (%)b63146314620935336376
 No cryptorchidism60 (25–79)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism58 (14–76)376 (<0.001)308 (<0.001)−167 (0.095)312 (<0.001)
Normal sperm morphology (%)c61626162612434716376
 No cryptorchidism6.5 (1.0–15.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism5.5 (0.5–15.5)0.17 (<0.001)0.18 (<0.001)0.20 (0.001)0.17 (<0.001)
Raw values
Unadjusted model 1
Adjusted model 2d
Adjusted model 3e
Adjusted model 3e with imputationf
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)
Total testis volume, Orchidometer (ml)62006200618435116376
 No cryptorchidism40 (26–56)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism38 (22–53)3.7 (<0.001)3.8 (<0.001)3.5 (<0.001)3.7 (<0.001)
Total testis volume, US (ml)a60816081606534456376
 No cryptorchidism28 (17–43)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism26 (15–41)0.085 (<0.001)0.097 (<0.001)0.071 (<0.001)0.092 (<0.001)
Semen volume (ml)a63506350631135826376
 No cryptorchidism3.2 (1.3–6.1)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism3.2 (1.4–6.0)0.003 (0.80)0.004 (0.71)0.001 (0.93)0.005 (0.604)
Sperm concentration (mill/ml)a63516351631235826376
 No cryptorchidism45 (4–161)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism32 (1–147)0.38 (<0.001)0.41 (<0.001)0.39 (<0.001)0.40 (<0.001)
Total sperm count (mill)a63446344630535796376
 No cryptorchidism143 (11–523)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism107 (1–451)0.55 (<0.001)0.59 (<0.001)0.56 (<0.001)0.57 (<0.001)
Progressive sperm motility (%)b63146314620935336376
 No cryptorchidism60 (25–79)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism58 (14–76)376 (<0.001)308 (<0.001)−167 (0.095)312 (<0.001)
Normal sperm morphology (%)c61626162612434716376
 No cryptorchidism6.5 (1.0–15.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism5.5 (0.5–15.5)0.17 (<0.001)0.18 (<0.001)0.20 (0.001)0.17 (<0.001)

Data are presented as medians (5–95 percentiles) and β-estimates (P-value) from linear regression analyses. Values provided in bold indicate a significant result with a P-value <0.05.

a

Cubic root transformed.

b

Second potency transformed.

c

Square root transformed.

d

Total testis volumes were adjusted for examination period (1996–2001, 2002–mid-2012 and mid-2012–2017) and age (years). Semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count and sperm morphology was also adjusted for abstinence time (h). Progressive sperm motility was additionally adjusted for time between semen sampling and analysis (min).

e

Adjusted for Model 2 variables and birth weight (<2500 g, 2500–5000 g and >5000 g), prematurity (yes/no) and maternal smoking during pregnancy (yes/no).

f

With imputed data for observations with missing data using chained equations implemented in the R package ‘mice’.

Table II

Semen parameters in young Danish men with and without a history of cryptorchidism examined from 1996 to 2017.

Raw values
Unadjusted model 1
Adjusted model 2d
Adjusted model 3e
Adjusted model 3e with imputationf
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)
Total testis volume, Orchidometer (ml)62006200618435116376
 No cryptorchidism40 (26–56)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism38 (22–53)3.7 (<0.001)3.8 (<0.001)3.5 (<0.001)3.7 (<0.001)
Total testis volume, US (ml)a60816081606534456376
 No cryptorchidism28 (17–43)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism26 (15–41)0.085 (<0.001)0.097 (<0.001)0.071 (<0.001)0.092 (<0.001)
Semen volume (ml)a63506350631135826376
 No cryptorchidism3.2 (1.3–6.1)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism3.2 (1.4–6.0)0.003 (0.80)0.004 (0.71)0.001 (0.93)0.005 (0.604)
Sperm concentration (mill/ml)a63516351631235826376
 No cryptorchidism45 (4–161)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism32 (1–147)0.38 (<0.001)0.41 (<0.001)0.39 (<0.001)0.40 (<0.001)
Total sperm count (mill)a63446344630535796376
 No cryptorchidism143 (11–523)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism107 (1–451)0.55 (<0.001)0.59 (<0.001)0.56 (<0.001)0.57 (<0.001)
Progressive sperm motility (%)b63146314620935336376
 No cryptorchidism60 (25–79)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism58 (14–76)376 (<0.001)308 (<0.001)−167 (0.095)312 (<0.001)
Normal sperm morphology (%)c61626162612434716376
 No cryptorchidism6.5 (1.0–15.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism5.5 (0.5–15.5)0.17 (<0.001)0.18 (<0.001)0.20 (0.001)0.17 (<0.001)
Raw values
Unadjusted model 1
Adjusted model 2d
Adjusted model 3e
Adjusted model 3e with imputationf
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)
Total testis volume, Orchidometer (ml)62006200618435116376
 No cryptorchidism40 (26–56)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism38 (22–53)3.7 (<0.001)3.8 (<0.001)3.5 (<0.001)3.7 (<0.001)
Total testis volume, US (ml)a60816081606534456376
 No cryptorchidism28 (17–43)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism26 (15–41)0.085 (<0.001)0.097 (<0.001)0.071 (<0.001)0.092 (<0.001)
Semen volume (ml)a63506350631135826376
 No cryptorchidism3.2 (1.3–6.1)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism3.2 (1.4–6.0)0.003 (0.80)0.004 (0.71)0.001 (0.93)0.005 (0.604)
Sperm concentration (mill/ml)a63516351631235826376
 No cryptorchidism45 (4–161)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism32 (1–147)0.38 (<0.001)0.41 (<0.001)0.39 (<0.001)0.40 (<0.001)
Total sperm count (mill)a63446344630535796376
 No cryptorchidism143 (11–523)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism107 (1–451)0.55 (<0.001)0.59 (<0.001)0.56 (<0.001)0.57 (<0.001)
Progressive sperm motility (%)b63146314620935336376
 No cryptorchidism60 (25–79)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism58 (14–76)376 (<0.001)308 (<0.001)−167 (0.095)312 (<0.001)
Normal sperm morphology (%)c61626162612434716376
 No cryptorchidism6.5 (1.0–15.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism5.5 (0.5–15.5)0.17 (<0.001)0.18 (<0.001)0.20 (0.001)0.17 (<0.001)

Data are presented as medians (5–95 percentiles) and β-estimates (P-value) from linear regression analyses. Values provided in bold indicate a significant result with a P-value <0.05.

a

Cubic root transformed.

b

Second potency transformed.

c

Square root transformed.

d

Total testis volumes were adjusted for examination period (1996–2001, 2002–mid-2012 and mid-2012–2017) and age (years). Semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count and sperm morphology was also adjusted for abstinence time (h). Progressive sperm motility was additionally adjusted for time between semen sampling and analysis (min).

e

Adjusted for Model 2 variables and birth weight (<2500 g, 2500–5000 g and >5000 g), prematurity (yes/no) and maternal smoking during pregnancy (yes/no).

f

With imputed data for observations with missing data using chained equations implemented in the R package ‘mice’.

The association between cryptorchidism and reproductive hormones

Cryptorchidism was associated with higher FSH and LH in both the unadjusted and adjusted regression models (all P <0.05) (Table III). Levels of inhibin B were lower among men with a history of cryptorchidism across all three models (all P <0.001) (Table III and Fig. 2b). The ratio of inhibin B/FSH was 55.4 in cases compared to 71.6 in controls, corresponding to a 26% difference (95% CI: −50 to −22) after adjustment (Table III and Fig. 2b). A small significant difference was observed in both the free testosterone/LH ratio and testosterone/LH ratio, where the testosterone/LH ratio was 6% lower in men with a history of cryptorchidism (95% CI: −12 to −0.7) (Table III and Fig. 2b). No association was observed between cryptorchidism and testosterone, free testosterone, SHBG or oestradiol after adjustments.

Table III

Reproductive hormones in young Danish men with and without a history of cryptorchidism examined from 1996 to 2017.

Raw values
Unadjusted model 1
Adjusted model 2a
Adjusted model 3b
Adjusted model 3b with imputationc
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)
FSH (IU/L)63146314589533486376
 No cryptorchidism2.6 (1.0–6.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism3.1 (1.0–8.6)0.18 (<0.001)0.17 (<0.001)0.17 (<0.001)0.18 (<0.001)
LH (IU/L)63216321590233546376
 No cryptorchidism3.4 (1.6–6.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism3.8 (1.8–7.3)0.090 (<0.001)0.082 (<0.001)0.071 (0.004)0.082 (<0.001)
Inhibin B (pg/ml)63116311589233456376
 No cryptorchidism184 (90–323)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism167 (66–333)0.11 (<0.001)0.12 (<0.001)0.13 (<0.001)0.13 (<0.001)
Testosterone (nmol/L)63146314589533526376
 No cryptorchidism21 (13–34)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism22 (12–36)0.021 (0.13)0.012 (0.39)0.013 (0.48)0.012 (<0.001)
Free testosterone (nmol/L)63106310589133506376
 No cryptorchidism0.48 (0.29–0.79)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism0.51 (0.31–0.82)0.044 (0.002)0.013 (0.37)0.011 (0.55)0.013 (0.37)
SHBG (nmol/L)63186318589933526376
 No cryptorchidism30 (15–53)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism30 (13–49)0.038 (0.034)0.00 (0.99)0.006 (0.79)0.00 (0.99)
Oestradiol (pmol/L)62786278586033266376
 No cryptorchidism82 (45–135)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism84 (49–142)0.035 (0.028)0.035 (0.028)0.022 (0.32)0.028 (0.075)
Inhibin B/FSH ratio63106310589133456376
 No cryptorchidism71.6 (16.8–261.9)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism55.4 (9.2–245.6)0.29 (<0.001)0.29 (<0.001)0.30 (<0.001)0.30 (<0.001)
Testosterone/LH ratio63136313589433526376
 No cryptorchidism6.3 (3.0–12.8)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism5.9 (2.8–11.7)0.069 (<0.001)0.069 (<0.001)0.058 (0.025)0.07 (<0.001)
Free testosterone/LH ratio63096309589033506376
 No cryptorchidism0.14 (0.068–0.29)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism0.14 (0.065–0.28)0.045 (0.025)0.068 (0.001)0.060 (0.025)0.068 (<0.001)
Raw values
Unadjusted model 1
Adjusted model 2a
Adjusted model 3b
Adjusted model 3b with imputationc
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)
FSH (IU/L)63146314589533486376
 No cryptorchidism2.6 (1.0–6.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism3.1 (1.0–8.6)0.18 (<0.001)0.17 (<0.001)0.17 (<0.001)0.18 (<0.001)
LH (IU/L)63216321590233546376
 No cryptorchidism3.4 (1.6–6.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism3.8 (1.8–7.3)0.090 (<0.001)0.082 (<0.001)0.071 (0.004)0.082 (<0.001)
Inhibin B (pg/ml)63116311589233456376
 No cryptorchidism184 (90–323)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism167 (66–333)0.11 (<0.001)0.12 (<0.001)0.13 (<0.001)0.13 (<0.001)
Testosterone (nmol/L)63146314589533526376
 No cryptorchidism21 (13–34)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism22 (12–36)0.021 (0.13)0.012 (0.39)0.013 (0.48)0.012 (<0.001)
Free testosterone (nmol/L)63106310589133506376
 No cryptorchidism0.48 (0.29–0.79)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism0.51 (0.31–0.82)0.044 (0.002)0.013 (0.37)0.011 (0.55)0.013 (0.37)
SHBG (nmol/L)63186318589933526376
 No cryptorchidism30 (15–53)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism30 (13–49)0.038 (0.034)0.00 (0.99)0.006 (0.79)0.00 (0.99)
Oestradiol (pmol/L)62786278586033266376
 No cryptorchidism82 (45–135)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism84 (49–142)0.035 (0.028)0.035 (0.028)0.022 (0.32)0.028 (0.075)
Inhibin B/FSH ratio63106310589133456376
 No cryptorchidism71.6 (16.8–261.9)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism55.4 (9.2–245.6)0.29 (<0.001)0.29 (<0.001)0.30 (<0.001)0.30 (<0.001)
Testosterone/LH ratio63136313589433526376
 No cryptorchidism6.3 (3.0–12.8)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism5.9 (2.8–11.7)0.069 (<0.001)0.069 (<0.001)0.058 (0.025)0.07 (<0.001)
Free testosterone/LH ratio63096309589033506376
 No cryptorchidism0.14 (0.068–0.29)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism0.14 (0.065–0.28)0.045 (0.025)0.068 (0.001)0.060 (0.025)0.068 (<0.001)

Data are presented as medians (5–95 percentiles) and results from linear regression analysis (β-estimate and P-value). All hormones are ln-transformed. Values provided in bold indicate a significant result with a P-value <0.05.

SHBG, sex hormone-binding globulin.

a

Adjusted for examination period (1996–2001, 2002–mid-2012 and mid-2012–2017), time of blood sampling (h and min), BMI (kg/m2), smoking status (yes/no) and age (years).

b

Adjusted for Model 2 variables, Birth weight (<2500 g, 2500–5000 g and >5000 g), Prematurity (yes/no) and Maternal smoking during pregnancy (yes/no).

c

With imputed data for observations with missing data using chained equations implemented in the R package ‘mice’.

Table III

Reproductive hormones in young Danish men with and without a history of cryptorchidism examined from 1996 to 2017.

Raw values
Unadjusted model 1
Adjusted model 2a
Adjusted model 3b
Adjusted model 3b with imputationc
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)
FSH (IU/L)63146314589533486376
 No cryptorchidism2.6 (1.0–6.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism3.1 (1.0–8.6)0.18 (<0.001)0.17 (<0.001)0.17 (<0.001)0.18 (<0.001)
LH (IU/L)63216321590233546376
 No cryptorchidism3.4 (1.6–6.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism3.8 (1.8–7.3)0.090 (<0.001)0.082 (<0.001)0.071 (0.004)0.082 (<0.001)
Inhibin B (pg/ml)63116311589233456376
 No cryptorchidism184 (90–323)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism167 (66–333)0.11 (<0.001)0.12 (<0.001)0.13 (<0.001)0.13 (<0.001)
Testosterone (nmol/L)63146314589533526376
 No cryptorchidism21 (13–34)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism22 (12–36)0.021 (0.13)0.012 (0.39)0.013 (0.48)0.012 (<0.001)
Free testosterone (nmol/L)63106310589133506376
 No cryptorchidism0.48 (0.29–0.79)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism0.51 (0.31–0.82)0.044 (0.002)0.013 (0.37)0.011 (0.55)0.013 (0.37)
SHBG (nmol/L)63186318589933526376
 No cryptorchidism30 (15–53)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism30 (13–49)0.038 (0.034)0.00 (0.99)0.006 (0.79)0.00 (0.99)
Oestradiol (pmol/L)62786278586033266376
 No cryptorchidism82 (45–135)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism84 (49–142)0.035 (0.028)0.035 (0.028)0.022 (0.32)0.028 (0.075)
Inhibin B/FSH ratio63106310589133456376
 No cryptorchidism71.6 (16.8–261.9)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism55.4 (9.2–245.6)0.29 (<0.001)0.29 (<0.001)0.30 (<0.001)0.30 (<0.001)
Testosterone/LH ratio63136313589433526376
 No cryptorchidism6.3 (3.0–12.8)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism5.9 (2.8–11.7)0.069 (<0.001)0.069 (<0.001)0.058 (0.025)0.07 (<0.001)
Free testosterone/LH ratio63096309589033506376
 No cryptorchidism0.14 (0.068–0.29)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism0.14 (0.065–0.28)0.045 (0.025)0.068 (0.001)0.060 (0.025)0.068 (<0.001)
Raw values
Unadjusted model 1
Adjusted model 2a
Adjusted model 3b
Adjusted model 3b with imputationc
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)
FSH (IU/L)63146314589533486376
 No cryptorchidism2.6 (1.0–6.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism3.1 (1.0–8.6)0.18 (<0.001)0.17 (<0.001)0.17 (<0.001)0.18 (<0.001)
LH (IU/L)63216321590233546376
 No cryptorchidism3.4 (1.6–6.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism3.8 (1.8–7.3)0.090 (<0.001)0.082 (<0.001)0.071 (0.004)0.082 (<0.001)
Inhibin B (pg/ml)63116311589233456376
 No cryptorchidism184 (90–323)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism167 (66–333)0.11 (<0.001)0.12 (<0.001)0.13 (<0.001)0.13 (<0.001)
Testosterone (nmol/L)63146314589533526376
 No cryptorchidism21 (13–34)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism22 (12–36)0.021 (0.13)0.012 (0.39)0.013 (0.48)0.012 (<0.001)
Free testosterone (nmol/L)63106310589133506376
 No cryptorchidism0.48 (0.29–0.79)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism0.51 (0.31–0.82)0.044 (0.002)0.013 (0.37)0.011 (0.55)0.013 (0.37)
SHBG (nmol/L)63186318589933526376
 No cryptorchidism30 (15–53)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism30 (13–49)0.038 (0.034)0.00 (0.99)0.006 (0.79)0.00 (0.99)
Oestradiol (pmol/L)62786278586033266376
 No cryptorchidism82 (45–135)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism84 (49–142)0.035 (0.028)0.035 (0.028)0.022 (0.32)0.028 (0.075)
Inhibin B/FSH ratio63106310589133456376
 No cryptorchidism71.6 (16.8–261.9)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism55.4 (9.2–245.6)0.29 (<0.001)0.29 (<0.001)0.30 (<0.001)0.30 (<0.001)
Testosterone/LH ratio63136313589433526376
 No cryptorchidism6.3 (3.0–12.8)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism5.9 (2.8–11.7)0.069 (<0.001)0.069 (<0.001)0.058 (0.025)0.07 (<0.001)
Free testosterone/LH ratio63096309589033506376
 No cryptorchidism0.14 (0.068–0.29)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Cryptorchidism0.14 (0.065–0.28)0.045 (0.025)0.068 (0.001)0.060 (0.025)0.068 (<0.001)

Data are presented as medians (5–95 percentiles) and results from linear regression analysis (β-estimate and P-value). All hormones are ln-transformed. Values provided in bold indicate a significant result with a P-value <0.05.

SHBG, sex hormone-binding globulin.

a

Adjusted for examination period (1996–2001, 2002–mid-2012 and mid-2012–2017), time of blood sampling (h and min), BMI (kg/m2), smoking status (yes/no) and age (years).

b

Adjusted for Model 2 variables, Birth weight (<2500 g, 2500–5000 g and >5000 g), Prematurity (yes/no) and Maternal smoking during pregnancy (yes/no).

c

With imputed data for observations with missing data using chained equations implemented in the R package ‘mice’.

Overall, the estimates did not change substantially across the model approaches as the included confounders pulled the estimates in opposite directions. When including maternal smoking during pregnancy the associations were attenuated whereas the effect of birthweight and prematurity differed depending on the measured outcome and in some outcomes the effects equalized each other.

In general, results from the hormone analyses of Model 3 applying imputed data were similar to results based on the reduced population with available data (Tables III and V).

Unilateral versus bilateral cryptorchidism and treatment modus

Data on unilateral or bilateral cryptorchidism were available for 329 men (unilateral n = 203; bilateral n = 126). No differences between the two groups were detected in semen parameters or reproductive hormones (Supplementary Tables SII and SIII).

In the 450 cases with available information, 158 experienced spontaneous descent (median age 2 years), 186 had received hormone treatment only (median age 7 years) and 106 had undergone orchiopexy (median age 9 years). Overall, men with a history of cryptorchidism had poorer testicular function compared to controls irrespective of course of treatment (Tables IV and V). Men with spontaneous descent or hormone treatment had similar testicular function. Men who had undergone orchiopexy had significantly lower sperm concentration (P <0.001) and total sperm count (P <0.001) than controls. Men who had undergone orchiopexy between 11 and 17 years of age had lower median values on all markers of testicular function compared to those who had undergone orchiopexy between 0 and 5 years of age, but the differences were not statistically significant (Supplementary Table SIV).

Table IV

Semen parameters in young Danish men with and without a history of cryptorchidism examined from 1996 to 2017 stratified according to treatment modality.

Raw values
Unadjusted model 1
Adjusted model 2d
Adjusted model 3e
Adjusted model 3e with imputationf
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)
Total testis volume, Orchidometer (ml)60906090607434536376
 No cryptorchidism40 (27–57)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent38 (26–53)3.9 (<0.001)3.6 (<0.001)3.8 (<0.001)3.3 (<0.001)
 Hormone treatment*40 (22–52)2.7 (<0.001)3.0 (<0.001)3.3 (0.001)3.0 (<0.001)
 Orchiopexy34 (20–53)7.2 (<0.001)6.8 (<0.001)5.1 (<0.001)6.6 (<0.001)
Total testis volume, US (ml)a59775977596133906376
 No cryptorchidism28 (17–43)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent26 (17–43)−0.026 (0.27)0.066 (0.006)−0.047 (0.11)0.057 (0.016)
 Hormone treatment*27 (14–42)0.068 (0.002)0.061 (0.005)−0.046 (0.13)0.057 (0.008)
 Orchiopexy24 (12–39)0.18 (<0.001)0.20 (<0.001)0.18 (<0.001)0.20 (<0.001)
Semen volume (ml)a62306230619235216376
 No cryptorchidism3.2 (1.3–6.1)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent3.1 (1.4–6.1)−0.01 (0.49)−0.006 (0.74)−0.003 (0.90)−0.006 (0.75)
 Hormone treatment*3.4 (1.4–6.4)0.03 (0.13)0.021 (0.203)0.021 (0.35)0.023 (0.17)
 Orchiopexy2.9 (1.1–5.4)0.051 (0.019)−0.041 (0.056)0.064 (0.023)−0.038 (0.083)
Sperm concentration (mill/ml)a62316231619335216376
 No cryptorchidism45 (4–161)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent34 (1–159)0.31 (0.001)0.33 (0.001)0.29 (0.015)0.31 (0.002)
 Hormone treatment*39 (0–147)0.22 (0.013)0.26 (0.004)−0.16 (0.19)0.26 (0.004)
 Orchiopexy23 (0–134)0.72 (<0.001)0.72 (<0.001)0.95 (<0.001)0.72 (<0.001)
Total sperm count (mill)a62246224618635186376
 No cryptorchidism143 (11–523)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent106 (3–408)0.48 (0.001)0.50 (0.001)0.43 (0.019)0.47 (0.002)
 Hormone treatment*122 (3–468)−0.24 (0.073)0.31 (0.025)−0.15 (0.43)0.30 (0.029)
 Orchiopexy69 (0–435)1.19 (<0.001)1.15 (<0.001)1.58 (<0.001)1.1 (<0.001)
Progressive sperm motility (%)b61946194609134736376
 No cryptorchidism60 (25–79)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent58 (19–75)547 (<0.001)456 (0.001)−303 (0.082)431 (0.002)
 Hormone treatment*58 (20–76)−165 (0.19)−89 (0.48)211 (0.23)−129 (0.31)
 Orchiopexy53 (11–74)688 (<0.001)601 (<0.001)769 (0.001)601 (<0.001)
Normal sperm morphology (%)c60496049601234146376
 No cryptorchidism6.5 (1.0–15.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent5.0 (0.0–16.0)0.20 (0.012)0.21 (0.011)−0.19 (0.055)0.19 (0.017)
 Hormone treatment*7.0 (1.0–16.0)0.083 (0.26)0.071 (0.34)0.039 (0.70)0.066 (0.37)
 Orchiopexy3.8 (0.0–14.5)0.51 (<0.001)0.50 (<0.001)0.67 (<0.001)0.51 (<0.001)
Raw values
Unadjusted model 1
Adjusted model 2d
Adjusted model 3e
Adjusted model 3e with imputationf
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)
Total testis volume, Orchidometer (ml)60906090607434536376
 No cryptorchidism40 (27–57)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent38 (26–53)3.9 (<0.001)3.6 (<0.001)3.8 (<0.001)3.3 (<0.001)
 Hormone treatment*40 (22–52)2.7 (<0.001)3.0 (<0.001)3.3 (0.001)3.0 (<0.001)
 Orchiopexy34 (20–53)7.2 (<0.001)6.8 (<0.001)5.1 (<0.001)6.6 (<0.001)
Total testis volume, US (ml)a59775977596133906376
 No cryptorchidism28 (17–43)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent26 (17–43)−0.026 (0.27)0.066 (0.006)−0.047 (0.11)0.057 (0.016)
 Hormone treatment*27 (14–42)0.068 (0.002)0.061 (0.005)−0.046 (0.13)0.057 (0.008)
 Orchiopexy24 (12–39)0.18 (<0.001)0.20 (<0.001)0.18 (<0.001)0.20 (<0.001)
Semen volume (ml)a62306230619235216376
 No cryptorchidism3.2 (1.3–6.1)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent3.1 (1.4–6.1)−0.01 (0.49)−0.006 (0.74)−0.003 (0.90)−0.006 (0.75)
 Hormone treatment*3.4 (1.4–6.4)0.03 (0.13)0.021 (0.203)0.021 (0.35)0.023 (0.17)
 Orchiopexy2.9 (1.1–5.4)0.051 (0.019)−0.041 (0.056)0.064 (0.023)−0.038 (0.083)
Sperm concentration (mill/ml)a62316231619335216376
 No cryptorchidism45 (4–161)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent34 (1–159)0.31 (0.001)0.33 (0.001)0.29 (0.015)0.31 (0.002)
 Hormone treatment*39 (0–147)0.22 (0.013)0.26 (0.004)−0.16 (0.19)0.26 (0.004)
 Orchiopexy23 (0–134)0.72 (<0.001)0.72 (<0.001)0.95 (<0.001)0.72 (<0.001)
Total sperm count (mill)a62246224618635186376
 No cryptorchidism143 (11–523)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent106 (3–408)0.48 (0.001)0.50 (0.001)0.43 (0.019)0.47 (0.002)
 Hormone treatment*122 (3–468)−0.24 (0.073)0.31 (0.025)−0.15 (0.43)0.30 (0.029)
 Orchiopexy69 (0–435)1.19 (<0.001)1.15 (<0.001)1.58 (<0.001)1.1 (<0.001)
Progressive sperm motility (%)b61946194609134736376
 No cryptorchidism60 (25–79)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent58 (19–75)547 (<0.001)456 (0.001)−303 (0.082)431 (0.002)
 Hormone treatment*58 (20–76)−165 (0.19)−89 (0.48)211 (0.23)−129 (0.31)
 Orchiopexy53 (11–74)688 (<0.001)601 (<0.001)769 (0.001)601 (<0.001)
Normal sperm morphology (%)c60496049601234146376
 No cryptorchidism6.5 (1.0–15.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent5.0 (0.0–16.0)0.20 (0.012)0.21 (0.011)−0.19 (0.055)0.19 (0.017)
 Hormone treatment*7.0 (1.0–16.0)0.083 (0.26)0.071 (0.34)0.039 (0.70)0.066 (0.37)
 Orchiopexy3.8 (0.0–14.5)0.51 (<0.001)0.50 (<0.001)0.67 (<0.001)0.51 (<0.001)

Data are presented as medians (5–95 percentiles) and results from linear regression analysis (β-estimate and P-value). In the 4560 cases with available information 158 experienced spontaneous descend, 186 had received hormone treatment and 106 had undergone an orchiopexy. Values provided in bold indicate a significant result with a P-value <0.05.

HCG, human chorionic gonadotropin.

a

Cubic root transformed.

b

Second potency transformed.

c

Square root transformed.

d

Total testis volumes were adjusted for examination period (1996–2001, 2002–mid-2012 and mid-2012–2017) and age (years). Semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count and sperm morphology was also adjusted for abstinence time (h). Progressive sperm motility was additionally adjusted for time between semen sampling and analysis (min).

e

Adjusted for Model 2 variables and birth weight (<2500 g, 2500–5000 g and >5000 g), prematurity (yes/no) and maternal smoking during pregnancy (yes/no).

f

With imputed data for observations with missing data using chained equations implemented in the R package ‘mice’.

*

HCG or GnRH injection.

Table IV

Semen parameters in young Danish men with and without a history of cryptorchidism examined from 1996 to 2017 stratified according to treatment modality.

Raw values
Unadjusted model 1
Adjusted model 2d
Adjusted model 3e
Adjusted model 3e with imputationf
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)
Total testis volume, Orchidometer (ml)60906090607434536376
 No cryptorchidism40 (27–57)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent38 (26–53)3.9 (<0.001)3.6 (<0.001)3.8 (<0.001)3.3 (<0.001)
 Hormone treatment*40 (22–52)2.7 (<0.001)3.0 (<0.001)3.3 (0.001)3.0 (<0.001)
 Orchiopexy34 (20–53)7.2 (<0.001)6.8 (<0.001)5.1 (<0.001)6.6 (<0.001)
Total testis volume, US (ml)a59775977596133906376
 No cryptorchidism28 (17–43)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent26 (17–43)−0.026 (0.27)0.066 (0.006)−0.047 (0.11)0.057 (0.016)
 Hormone treatment*27 (14–42)0.068 (0.002)0.061 (0.005)−0.046 (0.13)0.057 (0.008)
 Orchiopexy24 (12–39)0.18 (<0.001)0.20 (<0.001)0.18 (<0.001)0.20 (<0.001)
Semen volume (ml)a62306230619235216376
 No cryptorchidism3.2 (1.3–6.1)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent3.1 (1.4–6.1)−0.01 (0.49)−0.006 (0.74)−0.003 (0.90)−0.006 (0.75)
 Hormone treatment*3.4 (1.4–6.4)0.03 (0.13)0.021 (0.203)0.021 (0.35)0.023 (0.17)
 Orchiopexy2.9 (1.1–5.4)0.051 (0.019)−0.041 (0.056)0.064 (0.023)−0.038 (0.083)
Sperm concentration (mill/ml)a62316231619335216376
 No cryptorchidism45 (4–161)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent34 (1–159)0.31 (0.001)0.33 (0.001)0.29 (0.015)0.31 (0.002)
 Hormone treatment*39 (0–147)0.22 (0.013)0.26 (0.004)−0.16 (0.19)0.26 (0.004)
 Orchiopexy23 (0–134)0.72 (<0.001)0.72 (<0.001)0.95 (<0.001)0.72 (<0.001)
Total sperm count (mill)a62246224618635186376
 No cryptorchidism143 (11–523)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent106 (3–408)0.48 (0.001)0.50 (0.001)0.43 (0.019)0.47 (0.002)
 Hormone treatment*122 (3–468)−0.24 (0.073)0.31 (0.025)−0.15 (0.43)0.30 (0.029)
 Orchiopexy69 (0–435)1.19 (<0.001)1.15 (<0.001)1.58 (<0.001)1.1 (<0.001)
Progressive sperm motility (%)b61946194609134736376
 No cryptorchidism60 (25–79)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent58 (19–75)547 (<0.001)456 (0.001)−303 (0.082)431 (0.002)
 Hormone treatment*58 (20–76)−165 (0.19)−89 (0.48)211 (0.23)−129 (0.31)
 Orchiopexy53 (11–74)688 (<0.001)601 (<0.001)769 (0.001)601 (<0.001)
Normal sperm morphology (%)c60496049601234146376
 No cryptorchidism6.5 (1.0–15.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent5.0 (0.0–16.0)0.20 (0.012)0.21 (0.011)−0.19 (0.055)0.19 (0.017)
 Hormone treatment*7.0 (1.0–16.0)0.083 (0.26)0.071 (0.34)0.039 (0.70)0.066 (0.37)
 Orchiopexy3.8 (0.0–14.5)0.51 (<0.001)0.50 (<0.001)0.67 (<0.001)0.51 (<0.001)
Raw values
Unadjusted model 1
Adjusted model 2d
Adjusted model 3e
Adjusted model 3e with imputationf
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)
Total testis volume, Orchidometer (ml)60906090607434536376
 No cryptorchidism40 (27–57)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent38 (26–53)3.9 (<0.001)3.6 (<0.001)3.8 (<0.001)3.3 (<0.001)
 Hormone treatment*40 (22–52)2.7 (<0.001)3.0 (<0.001)3.3 (0.001)3.0 (<0.001)
 Orchiopexy34 (20–53)7.2 (<0.001)6.8 (<0.001)5.1 (<0.001)6.6 (<0.001)
Total testis volume, US (ml)a59775977596133906376
 No cryptorchidism28 (17–43)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent26 (17–43)−0.026 (0.27)0.066 (0.006)−0.047 (0.11)0.057 (0.016)
 Hormone treatment*27 (14–42)0.068 (0.002)0.061 (0.005)−0.046 (0.13)0.057 (0.008)
 Orchiopexy24 (12–39)0.18 (<0.001)0.20 (<0.001)0.18 (<0.001)0.20 (<0.001)
Semen volume (ml)a62306230619235216376
 No cryptorchidism3.2 (1.3–6.1)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent3.1 (1.4–6.1)−0.01 (0.49)−0.006 (0.74)−0.003 (0.90)−0.006 (0.75)
 Hormone treatment*3.4 (1.4–6.4)0.03 (0.13)0.021 (0.203)0.021 (0.35)0.023 (0.17)
 Orchiopexy2.9 (1.1–5.4)0.051 (0.019)−0.041 (0.056)0.064 (0.023)−0.038 (0.083)
Sperm concentration (mill/ml)a62316231619335216376
 No cryptorchidism45 (4–161)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent34 (1–159)0.31 (0.001)0.33 (0.001)0.29 (0.015)0.31 (0.002)
 Hormone treatment*39 (0–147)0.22 (0.013)0.26 (0.004)−0.16 (0.19)0.26 (0.004)
 Orchiopexy23 (0–134)0.72 (<0.001)0.72 (<0.001)0.95 (<0.001)0.72 (<0.001)
Total sperm count (mill)a62246224618635186376
 No cryptorchidism143 (11–523)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent106 (3–408)0.48 (0.001)0.50 (0.001)0.43 (0.019)0.47 (0.002)
 Hormone treatment*122 (3–468)−0.24 (0.073)0.31 (0.025)−0.15 (0.43)0.30 (0.029)
 Orchiopexy69 (0–435)1.19 (<0.001)1.15 (<0.001)1.58 (<0.001)1.1 (<0.001)
Progressive sperm motility (%)b61946194609134736376
 No cryptorchidism60 (25–79)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent58 (19–75)547 (<0.001)456 (0.001)−303 (0.082)431 (0.002)
 Hormone treatment*58 (20–76)−165 (0.19)−89 (0.48)211 (0.23)−129 (0.31)
 Orchiopexy53 (11–74)688 (<0.001)601 (<0.001)769 (0.001)601 (<0.001)
Normal sperm morphology (%)c60496049601234146376
 No cryptorchidism6.5 (1.0–15.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent5.0 (0.0–16.0)0.20 (0.012)0.21 (0.011)−0.19 (0.055)0.19 (0.017)
 Hormone treatment*7.0 (1.0–16.0)0.083 (0.26)0.071 (0.34)0.039 (0.70)0.066 (0.37)
 Orchiopexy3.8 (0.0–14.5)0.51 (<0.001)0.50 (<0.001)0.67 (<0.001)0.51 (<0.001)

Data are presented as medians (5–95 percentiles) and results from linear regression analysis (β-estimate and P-value). In the 4560 cases with available information 158 experienced spontaneous descend, 186 had received hormone treatment and 106 had undergone an orchiopexy. Values provided in bold indicate a significant result with a P-value <0.05.

HCG, human chorionic gonadotropin.

a

Cubic root transformed.

b

Second potency transformed.

c

Square root transformed.

d

Total testis volumes were adjusted for examination period (1996–2001, 2002–mid-2012 and mid-2012–2017) and age (years). Semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count and sperm morphology was also adjusted for abstinence time (h). Progressive sperm motility was additionally adjusted for time between semen sampling and analysis (min).

e

Adjusted for Model 2 variables and birth weight (<2500 g, 2500–5000 g and >5000 g), prematurity (yes/no) and maternal smoking during pregnancy (yes/no).

f

With imputed data for observations with missing data using chained equations implemented in the R package ‘mice’.

*

HCG or GnRH injection.

Table V

Reproductive hormones in young Danish men with and without a history of cryptorchidism examined from 1996 to 2017 stratified according to treatment modality.

Raw values
Unadjusted model 1
Adjusted model 2a
Adjusted model 3b
Adjusted model 3b with imputationc
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)
FSH (IU/L)61966196578132886376
 No cryptorchidism2.6 (1.0–6.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent3.1 (1.3–8.0)0.18 (<0.001)0.13 (0.006)0.087 (0.15)0.14 (0.004)
 Hormone treatment*2.8 (0.9–8.5)0.059 (0.18)0.071 (0.11)0.12 (0.041)0.085 (0.051)
 Orchiopexy4.0 (1.0–11.5)0.39 (<0.001)0.36 (<0.001)0.36 (<0.001)0.35 (<0.001)
LH (IU/L)62036203578832946376
 No cryptorchidism3.4 (1.6–6.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent3.9 (2.0–6.9)0.11 (0.001)0.093 (0.008)0.083 (0.058)0.083 (0.016)
 Hormone treatment*3.6 (1.8–6.6)0.032 (0.30)0.022 (0.48)0.022 (0.61)0.036 (0.26)
 Orchiopexy4.0 (1.7–7.5)0.14 (0.001)0.13 (0.002)0.14 (0.008)0.13 (0.003)
Inhibin B (pg/ml)61936193577832856376
 No cryptorchidism184 (90–323)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent164 (83–342)−0.043 (0.24)0.088 (0.019)−0.088 (0.055)0.081 (0.034)
 Hormone treatment*209 (81–352)−0.0023 (0.95)0.0023 (0.95)−0.087 (0.057)−0.015 (0.66)
 Orchiopexy159 (56–357)0.20 (<0.001)0.24 (<0.001)0.18 (0.001)0.23 (<0.001)
Testosterone (nmol/L)61966196578132926376
 No cryptorchidism21 (13–34)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent22 (13–36)0.044 (0.09)0.013 (0.61)0.012 (0.71)0.008 (0.76)
 Hormone treatment*21 (12–34)−0.016 (0.51)−0.02 (0.40)0.013 (0.68)−0.007 (0.77)
 Orchiopexy24 (13–37)0.076 (0.014)0.044 (0.15)0.041 (0.30)0.037 (0.22)
Free testosterone (nmol/L)61926192577732906376
 No cryptorchidism0.48 (0.29–0.79)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent0.53 (0.34–0.88)0.097 (<0.001)0.035 (0.19)0.020 (0.55)0.03 (0.26)
 Hormone treatment*0.49 (0.29–0.81)0.006 (0.79)−0.014 (0.58)0.024 (0.48)−0.005 (0.84)
 Orchiopexy0.54 (0.31–0.90)0.102 (0.002)0.049 (0.13)0.046 (0.027)0.049 (0.12)
SHBG (nmol/L)62006200578532926376
 No cryptorchidism30 (15–53)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent28 (10–47)0.095 (0.004)−0.045 (0.14)−0.017 (0.66)−0.044 (0.16)
 Hormone treatment*30 (14–50)−0.039 (0.20)−0.013 (0.64)−0.014 (0.70)−0.002 (0.96)
 Orchiopexy30 (14–51)−0.025 (0.53)0.0025 (0.95)0.0049 (0.92)−0.011 (0.77)
Oestradiol (pmol/L)61616161574732666376
 No cryptorchidism82 (45–135)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent91 (52–142)0.083 (0.004)0.070 (0.018)0.058 (0.14)0.064 (0.028)
 Hormone treatment*78 (48–118)−0.042 (0.12)−0.038 (0.16)−0.032 (0.41)−0.039 (0.14)
 Orchiopexy88 (52–146)0.083 (0.018)0.084 (0.017)0.033 (0.49)0.075 (0.031)
Inhibin B/FSH ratio61926192577732856376
 No cryptorchidism71.6 (16.8–261.9)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent53.3 (14.9–225.0)0.23 (0.002)0.22 (0.003)−0.18 (0.062)0.22 (0.003)
 Hormone treatment*74.1 (11.9–336.0)−0.062 (0.36)−0.069 (0.32)0.21 (0.024)−0.10 (0.14)
 Orchiopexy44.6 (5.8–218.8)0.58 (<0.001)0.61 (<0.001)0.55 (<0.001)0.58 (<0.001)
Testosterone/LH ratio61956195578032926376
 No cryptorchidism6.3 (3.0–12.8)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent5.6 (2.9–11.7)−0.066 (0.071)0.079 (0.030)−0.071 (0.12)0.075 (0.038)
 Hormone treatment*6.1 (3.0–12.0)−0.047 (0.16)−0.042 (0.21)−0.009 (0.84)−0.043 (0.19)
 Orchiopexy6.0 (2.8–11.2)−0.065 (0.14)0.086 (0.048)−0.10 (0.071)0.089 (0.041)
Free Testosterone/LH ratio61916191577632906376
 No cryptorchidism0.14 (0.068–0.29)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent0.14 (0.071–0.31)−0.012 (0.75)−0.057 (0.13)−0.063 (0.18)−0.055 (0.14)
 Hormone treatment*0.14 (0.068–0.28)−0.025 (0.46)−0.036 (0.30)0.002 (0.97)−0.041 (0.23)
 Orchiopexy0.15 (0.059–0.27)−0.040 (0.37)−0.081 (0.074)−0.098 (0.094)−0.077 (0.087)
Raw values
Unadjusted model 1
Adjusted model 2a
Adjusted model 3b
Adjusted model 3b with imputationc
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)
FSH (IU/L)61966196578132886376
 No cryptorchidism2.6 (1.0–6.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent3.1 (1.3–8.0)0.18 (<0.001)0.13 (0.006)0.087 (0.15)0.14 (0.004)
 Hormone treatment*2.8 (0.9–8.5)0.059 (0.18)0.071 (0.11)0.12 (0.041)0.085 (0.051)
 Orchiopexy4.0 (1.0–11.5)0.39 (<0.001)0.36 (<0.001)0.36 (<0.001)0.35 (<0.001)
LH (IU/L)62036203578832946376
 No cryptorchidism3.4 (1.6–6.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent3.9 (2.0–6.9)0.11 (0.001)0.093 (0.008)0.083 (0.058)0.083 (0.016)
 Hormone treatment*3.6 (1.8–6.6)0.032 (0.30)0.022 (0.48)0.022 (0.61)0.036 (0.26)
 Orchiopexy4.0 (1.7–7.5)0.14 (0.001)0.13 (0.002)0.14 (0.008)0.13 (0.003)
Inhibin B (pg/ml)61936193577832856376
 No cryptorchidism184 (90–323)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent164 (83–342)−0.043 (0.24)0.088 (0.019)−0.088 (0.055)0.081 (0.034)
 Hormone treatment*209 (81–352)−0.0023 (0.95)0.0023 (0.95)−0.087 (0.057)−0.015 (0.66)
 Orchiopexy159 (56–357)0.20 (<0.001)0.24 (<0.001)0.18 (0.001)0.23 (<0.001)
Testosterone (nmol/L)61966196578132926376
 No cryptorchidism21 (13–34)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent22 (13–36)0.044 (0.09)0.013 (0.61)0.012 (0.71)0.008 (0.76)
 Hormone treatment*21 (12–34)−0.016 (0.51)−0.02 (0.40)0.013 (0.68)−0.007 (0.77)
 Orchiopexy24 (13–37)0.076 (0.014)0.044 (0.15)0.041 (0.30)0.037 (0.22)
Free testosterone (nmol/L)61926192577732906376
 No cryptorchidism0.48 (0.29–0.79)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent0.53 (0.34–0.88)0.097 (<0.001)0.035 (0.19)0.020 (0.55)0.03 (0.26)
 Hormone treatment*0.49 (0.29–0.81)0.006 (0.79)−0.014 (0.58)0.024 (0.48)−0.005 (0.84)
 Orchiopexy0.54 (0.31–0.90)0.102 (0.002)0.049 (0.13)0.046 (0.027)0.049 (0.12)
SHBG (nmol/L)62006200578532926376
 No cryptorchidism30 (15–53)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent28 (10–47)0.095 (0.004)−0.045 (0.14)−0.017 (0.66)−0.044 (0.16)
 Hormone treatment*30 (14–50)−0.039 (0.20)−0.013 (0.64)−0.014 (0.70)−0.002 (0.96)
 Orchiopexy30 (14–51)−0.025 (0.53)0.0025 (0.95)0.0049 (0.92)−0.011 (0.77)
Oestradiol (pmol/L)61616161574732666376
 No cryptorchidism82 (45–135)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent91 (52–142)0.083 (0.004)0.070 (0.018)0.058 (0.14)0.064 (0.028)
 Hormone treatment*78 (48–118)−0.042 (0.12)−0.038 (0.16)−0.032 (0.41)−0.039 (0.14)
 Orchiopexy88 (52–146)0.083 (0.018)0.084 (0.017)0.033 (0.49)0.075 (0.031)
Inhibin B/FSH ratio61926192577732856376
 No cryptorchidism71.6 (16.8–261.9)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent53.3 (14.9–225.0)0.23 (0.002)0.22 (0.003)−0.18 (0.062)0.22 (0.003)
 Hormone treatment*74.1 (11.9–336.0)−0.062 (0.36)−0.069 (0.32)0.21 (0.024)−0.10 (0.14)
 Orchiopexy44.6 (5.8–218.8)0.58 (<0.001)0.61 (<0.001)0.55 (<0.001)0.58 (<0.001)
Testosterone/LH ratio61956195578032926376
 No cryptorchidism6.3 (3.0–12.8)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent5.6 (2.9–11.7)−0.066 (0.071)0.079 (0.030)−0.071 (0.12)0.075 (0.038)
 Hormone treatment*6.1 (3.0–12.0)−0.047 (0.16)−0.042 (0.21)−0.009 (0.84)−0.043 (0.19)
 Orchiopexy6.0 (2.8–11.2)−0.065 (0.14)0.086 (0.048)−0.10 (0.071)0.089 (0.041)
Free Testosterone/LH ratio61916191577632906376
 No cryptorchidism0.14 (0.068–0.29)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent0.14 (0.071–0.31)−0.012 (0.75)−0.057 (0.13)−0.063 (0.18)−0.055 (0.14)
 Hormone treatment*0.14 (0.068–0.28)−0.025 (0.46)−0.036 (0.30)0.002 (0.97)−0.041 (0.23)
 Orchiopexy0.15 (0.059–0.27)−0.040 (0.37)−0.081 (0.074)−0.098 (0.094)−0.077 (0.087)

Data are presented as medians (5–95 percentiles) and results from linear regression analysis (β-estimate and P-value). All hormones are ln-transformed. Values provided in bold indicate a significant result with a P-value <0.05.

a

Adjusted for examination period (1996–2001, 2002–mid-2012 and mid-2012–2017), time of blood sampling (h and min), BMI (kg/m2), smoking status (yes/no) and age (years).

b

Adjusted for Model 2 variables, birth weight (<2500 g, 2500–5000 g and >5000 g), prematurity (yes/no) and maternal smoking during pregnancy (yes/no).

c

With imputed data for observations with missing data using chained equations implemented in the R package ‘mice’.

*

HCG or GnRH injection.

Table V

Reproductive hormones in young Danish men with and without a history of cryptorchidism examined from 1996 to 2017 stratified according to treatment modality.

Raw values
Unadjusted model 1
Adjusted model 2a
Adjusted model 3b
Adjusted model 3b with imputationc
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)
FSH (IU/L)61966196578132886376
 No cryptorchidism2.6 (1.0–6.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent3.1 (1.3–8.0)0.18 (<0.001)0.13 (0.006)0.087 (0.15)0.14 (0.004)
 Hormone treatment*2.8 (0.9–8.5)0.059 (0.18)0.071 (0.11)0.12 (0.041)0.085 (0.051)
 Orchiopexy4.0 (1.0–11.5)0.39 (<0.001)0.36 (<0.001)0.36 (<0.001)0.35 (<0.001)
LH (IU/L)62036203578832946376
 No cryptorchidism3.4 (1.6–6.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent3.9 (2.0–6.9)0.11 (0.001)0.093 (0.008)0.083 (0.058)0.083 (0.016)
 Hormone treatment*3.6 (1.8–6.6)0.032 (0.30)0.022 (0.48)0.022 (0.61)0.036 (0.26)
 Orchiopexy4.0 (1.7–7.5)0.14 (0.001)0.13 (0.002)0.14 (0.008)0.13 (0.003)
Inhibin B (pg/ml)61936193577832856376
 No cryptorchidism184 (90–323)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent164 (83–342)−0.043 (0.24)0.088 (0.019)−0.088 (0.055)0.081 (0.034)
 Hormone treatment*209 (81–352)−0.0023 (0.95)0.0023 (0.95)−0.087 (0.057)−0.015 (0.66)
 Orchiopexy159 (56–357)0.20 (<0.001)0.24 (<0.001)0.18 (0.001)0.23 (<0.001)
Testosterone (nmol/L)61966196578132926376
 No cryptorchidism21 (13–34)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent22 (13–36)0.044 (0.09)0.013 (0.61)0.012 (0.71)0.008 (0.76)
 Hormone treatment*21 (12–34)−0.016 (0.51)−0.02 (0.40)0.013 (0.68)−0.007 (0.77)
 Orchiopexy24 (13–37)0.076 (0.014)0.044 (0.15)0.041 (0.30)0.037 (0.22)
Free testosterone (nmol/L)61926192577732906376
 No cryptorchidism0.48 (0.29–0.79)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent0.53 (0.34–0.88)0.097 (<0.001)0.035 (0.19)0.020 (0.55)0.03 (0.26)
 Hormone treatment*0.49 (0.29–0.81)0.006 (0.79)−0.014 (0.58)0.024 (0.48)−0.005 (0.84)
 Orchiopexy0.54 (0.31–0.90)0.102 (0.002)0.049 (0.13)0.046 (0.027)0.049 (0.12)
SHBG (nmol/L)62006200578532926376
 No cryptorchidism30 (15–53)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent28 (10–47)0.095 (0.004)−0.045 (0.14)−0.017 (0.66)−0.044 (0.16)
 Hormone treatment*30 (14–50)−0.039 (0.20)−0.013 (0.64)−0.014 (0.70)−0.002 (0.96)
 Orchiopexy30 (14–51)−0.025 (0.53)0.0025 (0.95)0.0049 (0.92)−0.011 (0.77)
Oestradiol (pmol/L)61616161574732666376
 No cryptorchidism82 (45–135)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent91 (52–142)0.083 (0.004)0.070 (0.018)0.058 (0.14)0.064 (0.028)
 Hormone treatment*78 (48–118)−0.042 (0.12)−0.038 (0.16)−0.032 (0.41)−0.039 (0.14)
 Orchiopexy88 (52–146)0.083 (0.018)0.084 (0.017)0.033 (0.49)0.075 (0.031)
Inhibin B/FSH ratio61926192577732856376
 No cryptorchidism71.6 (16.8–261.9)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent53.3 (14.9–225.0)0.23 (0.002)0.22 (0.003)−0.18 (0.062)0.22 (0.003)
 Hormone treatment*74.1 (11.9–336.0)−0.062 (0.36)−0.069 (0.32)0.21 (0.024)−0.10 (0.14)
 Orchiopexy44.6 (5.8–218.8)0.58 (<0.001)0.61 (<0.001)0.55 (<0.001)0.58 (<0.001)
Testosterone/LH ratio61956195578032926376
 No cryptorchidism6.3 (3.0–12.8)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent5.6 (2.9–11.7)−0.066 (0.071)0.079 (0.030)−0.071 (0.12)0.075 (0.038)
 Hormone treatment*6.1 (3.0–12.0)−0.047 (0.16)−0.042 (0.21)−0.009 (0.84)−0.043 (0.19)
 Orchiopexy6.0 (2.8–11.2)−0.065 (0.14)0.086 (0.048)−0.10 (0.071)0.089 (0.041)
Free Testosterone/LH ratio61916191577632906376
 No cryptorchidism0.14 (0.068–0.29)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent0.14 (0.071–0.31)−0.012 (0.75)−0.057 (0.13)−0.063 (0.18)−0.055 (0.14)
 Hormone treatment*0.14 (0.068–0.28)−0.025 (0.46)−0.036 (0.30)0.002 (0.97)−0.041 (0.23)
 Orchiopexy0.15 (0.059–0.27)−0.040 (0.37)−0.081 (0.074)−0.098 (0.094)−0.077 (0.087)
Raw values
Unadjusted model 1
Adjusted model 2a
Adjusted model 3b
Adjusted model 3b with imputationc
nMedian (5–95 percentiles)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)nβ (P-value)
FSH (IU/L)61966196578132886376
 No cryptorchidism2.6 (1.0–6.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent3.1 (1.3–8.0)0.18 (<0.001)0.13 (0.006)0.087 (0.15)0.14 (0.004)
 Hormone treatment*2.8 (0.9–8.5)0.059 (0.18)0.071 (0.11)0.12 (0.041)0.085 (0.051)
 Orchiopexy4.0 (1.0–11.5)0.39 (<0.001)0.36 (<0.001)0.36 (<0.001)0.35 (<0.001)
LH (IU/L)62036203578832946376
 No cryptorchidism3.4 (1.6–6.5)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent3.9 (2.0–6.9)0.11 (0.001)0.093 (0.008)0.083 (0.058)0.083 (0.016)
 Hormone treatment*3.6 (1.8–6.6)0.032 (0.30)0.022 (0.48)0.022 (0.61)0.036 (0.26)
 Orchiopexy4.0 (1.7–7.5)0.14 (0.001)0.13 (0.002)0.14 (0.008)0.13 (0.003)
Inhibin B (pg/ml)61936193577832856376
 No cryptorchidism184 (90–323)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent164 (83–342)−0.043 (0.24)0.088 (0.019)−0.088 (0.055)0.081 (0.034)
 Hormone treatment*209 (81–352)−0.0023 (0.95)0.0023 (0.95)−0.087 (0.057)−0.015 (0.66)
 Orchiopexy159 (56–357)0.20 (<0.001)0.24 (<0.001)0.18 (0.001)0.23 (<0.001)
Testosterone (nmol/L)61966196578132926376
 No cryptorchidism21 (13–34)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent22 (13–36)0.044 (0.09)0.013 (0.61)0.012 (0.71)0.008 (0.76)
 Hormone treatment*21 (12–34)−0.016 (0.51)−0.02 (0.40)0.013 (0.68)−0.007 (0.77)
 Orchiopexy24 (13–37)0.076 (0.014)0.044 (0.15)0.041 (0.30)0.037 (0.22)
Free testosterone (nmol/L)61926192577732906376
 No cryptorchidism0.48 (0.29–0.79)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent0.53 (0.34–0.88)0.097 (<0.001)0.035 (0.19)0.020 (0.55)0.03 (0.26)
 Hormone treatment*0.49 (0.29–0.81)0.006 (0.79)−0.014 (0.58)0.024 (0.48)−0.005 (0.84)
 Orchiopexy0.54 (0.31–0.90)0.102 (0.002)0.049 (0.13)0.046 (0.027)0.049 (0.12)
SHBG (nmol/L)62006200578532926376
 No cryptorchidism30 (15–53)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent28 (10–47)0.095 (0.004)−0.045 (0.14)−0.017 (0.66)−0.044 (0.16)
 Hormone treatment*30 (14–50)−0.039 (0.20)−0.013 (0.64)−0.014 (0.70)−0.002 (0.96)
 Orchiopexy30 (14–51)−0.025 (0.53)0.0025 (0.95)0.0049 (0.92)−0.011 (0.77)
Oestradiol (pmol/L)61616161574732666376
 No cryptorchidism82 (45–135)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent91 (52–142)0.083 (0.004)0.070 (0.018)0.058 (0.14)0.064 (0.028)
 Hormone treatment*78 (48–118)−0.042 (0.12)−0.038 (0.16)−0.032 (0.41)−0.039 (0.14)
 Orchiopexy88 (52–146)0.083 (0.018)0.084 (0.017)0.033 (0.49)0.075 (0.031)
Inhibin B/FSH ratio61926192577732856376
 No cryptorchidism71.6 (16.8–261.9)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent53.3 (14.9–225.0)0.23 (0.002)0.22 (0.003)−0.18 (0.062)0.22 (0.003)
 Hormone treatment*74.1 (11.9–336.0)−0.062 (0.36)−0.069 (0.32)0.21 (0.024)−0.10 (0.14)
 Orchiopexy44.6 (5.8–218.8)0.58 (<0.001)0.61 (<0.001)0.55 (<0.001)0.58 (<0.001)
Testosterone/LH ratio61956195578032926376
 No cryptorchidism6.3 (3.0–12.8)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent5.6 (2.9–11.7)−0.066 (0.071)0.079 (0.030)−0.071 (0.12)0.075 (0.038)
 Hormone treatment*6.1 (3.0–12.0)−0.047 (0.16)−0.042 (0.21)−0.009 (0.84)−0.043 (0.19)
 Orchiopexy6.0 (2.8–11.2)−0.065 (0.14)0.086 (0.048)−0.10 (0.071)0.089 (0.041)
Free Testosterone/LH ratio61916191577632906376
 No cryptorchidism0.14 (0.068–0.29)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
 Spontaneous descent0.14 (0.071–0.31)−0.012 (0.75)−0.057 (0.13)−0.063 (0.18)−0.055 (0.14)
 Hormone treatment*0.14 (0.068–0.28)−0.025 (0.46)−0.036 (0.30)0.002 (0.97)−0.041 (0.23)
 Orchiopexy0.15 (0.059–0.27)−0.040 (0.37)−0.081 (0.074)−0.098 (0.094)−0.077 (0.087)

Data are presented as medians (5–95 percentiles) and results from linear regression analysis (β-estimate and P-value). All hormones are ln-transformed. Values provided in bold indicate a significant result with a P-value <0.05.

a

Adjusted for examination period (1996–2001, 2002–mid-2012 and mid-2012–2017), time of blood sampling (h and min), BMI (kg/m2), smoking status (yes/no) and age (years).

b

Adjusted for Model 2 variables, birth weight (<2500 g, 2500–5000 g and >5000 g), prematurity (yes/no) and maternal smoking during pregnancy (yes/no).

c

With imputed data for observations with missing data using chained equations implemented in the R package ‘mice’.

*

HCG or GnRH injection.

Discussion

In this large study of more than 6000 young men from the general population, a history of cryptorchidism was associated with lower total testis volume and impaired semen quality and adversely altered serum levels of reproductive hormones. Particularly, men with a history of cryptorchidism had lower sperm counts and a reduced inhibin B/FSH ratio indicating a reduced spermatogenetic capacity. Leydig cell function, assessed as the serum testosterone/LH ratio, was also slightly lower.

Many previous studies investigating the association between cryptorchidism and testicular function are based on selected clinical populations and small sample sizes making it difficult to compare to our findings. Only one previous study utilizing an unselected population has been published, reporting smaller testis volume, and lower semen volume, sperm concentration and total sperm count in men with cryptorchidism but no differences in reproductive hormones (Hart et al., 2015). However, in that study, only 8 out of 326 (2.4%) men delivering semen samples had a history of cryptorchidism. Thus, our study is the first study to show the association between congenital cryptorchidism and testicular function in a large-scale unselected population-based study.

Cryptorchidism usually reflects a disturbed testicular development in utero (Welsh et al., 2008). Rodent studies have shown that cryptorchidism is associated with a reduced spermatogenetic capacity due to a reduction of the Sertoli cell number or function (Griswold, 1998; Sharpe, 2001). The lower total testis volume, sperm count and inhibin B/FSH ratio found in our study are compatible with a reduced Sertoli cell function or number and thus suggest a reduced spermatogenetic capacity in men with a history of cryptorchidism. Alternatively, the reduced spermatogenesis in the cases detected in this study could be due to a reduced capacity of spermatogonia to undergo mitosis and meiosis (Huff et al., 2001). Irrespective of this, the lower inhibin B and the higher FSH, leading to a reduced inhibin B/FSH ratio, indicate a primary testis problem rather than a problem in the hypothalamus or the pituitary gland in accordance with other studies based on selected populations (Lee and Coughlin, 2001; de Gouveia Brazao et al., 2003; van Brakel et al., 2013). We found no association between cryptorchidism and serum levels of testosterone, but detected a lower testosterone/LH ratio indicating a mild compensated Leydig cell failure (Jørgensen et al., 2016). In accordance with this, another previous study observed a compensated Leydig cell dysfunction in infertile men with a history of cryptorchidism compared to infertile controls. However, that study did not report an association in fertile men with and without a history of cryptorchidism (Andersson et al., 2004), supporting differences in testicular function within the group of men with a history of cryptorchidism as observed in our study.

Studies investigating testicular function in cases of unilateral versus bilateral cryptorchidism have generally detected a worse testicular function in men with bilateral cryptorchidism (Lee and Coughlin, 2001; Moretti et al., 2006; Trsinar and Muravec, 2009). However, these studies are all limited by small sample sizes and they only included unilateral and bilateral cases who underwent orchiopexy which is why these studies are not comparable to ours. In our study, we included men with uni- and bilateral cryptorchidism irrespective of treatment modus and did not detect a difference in testicular function between unilateral and bilateral cases, which could suggest that also in unilateral cases both testes are affected. Supporting our observations, studies have found that the contralateral normally descended testis in men with a history of unilateral cryptorchidism more often has an abnormal testicular consistency and a lower testicular volume than controls (van Brakel et al., 2015) as well as an increased risk of testicular cancer in both the cryptorchidic and the contralateral normally descended testis (Akre et al., 2009). However, in the present study information about unilateral and bilateral cryptorchidism was obtained by retrospective self-report which might have introduced misclassification due to lack of recall as to whether one or both testes were affected potentially causing a bias in the effect estimate for unilateral versus bilateral cases towards null.

In two previous studies based on 3-month-old Danish and Finish boys, negative associations between cryptorchidism and both Sertoli and Leydig cell function have been detected (Suomi et al., 2006; Bay et al., 2007) indicating that men with a history of cryptorchidism already have a reduced testicular potential at birth. This is further corroborated by the results of our study showing that treatment of cryptorchidism did not rescue testicular function. Men operated for cryptorchidism had the most affected testicular function compared to men following other treatment courses suggesting that the need for orchiopexy may reflect the most severe cases. The optimal age of the surgical treatment of cryptorchidism has been widely debated over the past decades and the recommended age has declined progressively since the 1950s. The present recommendation for cryptorchidism is orchiopexy between 6 and 12 months of age (Martin Ritzén et al., 2007; Tseng et al., 2017). Results from our study, although non-significant, indicate that an older age at orchiopexy may reduce testicular function as the raw median semen parameters were higher among men operated early in life (0–6 years) compared to men operated later in life (11–17 years). However, age at orchiopexy in our study is self-reported and may be associated with reporting bias, furthermore, the age-groups used in our study is broadly defined due to small samples. Nonetheless, our results are in line with other studies investigating differences in testicular function of men treated for cryptorchidism at different ages that generally found improved testicular function associated with decreasing age of treatment (Coughlin et al., 1999; Kollin et al., 2007; Canavese et al., 2009; Feyles et al., 2014).

A strength of our study is the sample size including data on 6376 men, of whom 570 (8.9%) had a history of cryptorchidism including both unilateral and bilateral cases, which provided good statistical power to detect differences in testicular function. We adjusted for covariates potentially influencing the intra- and inter-individual variation of semen and hormonal variables in order to minimize variation and for known confounders. Even though individual semen quality varies in repeated samples, each participant only delivered one semen sample as studies have shown that a single sample is sufficient for identifying average differences in semen quality between individuals in population-based studies (Rylander et al., 2009; Chiu et al., 2017). A weakness of our study is that information regarding cryptorchidism was obtained by retrospective self-report, why there is a possibility that some men with spontaneous descent during the first 3 months of life have been misclassified as controls. However, it is unlikely that misclassification has biased our estimates significantly, as 69% of the men had their responses validated by their mother. Most of the included men had no prior knowledge of their own fertility potential, and it is unlikely to have introduced a systematic bias or influenced the willingness to participate. An early study comparing participants with non-participants found that there was no difference in levels of reproductive hormones, place and year at birth or educational status (Andersen et al., 2000). Thus, we consider that our study population represents the general population of young Danish men. Another limitation is the lack of information about the type of hormone treatment which could be either human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) or gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue which have been the most common treatment methods when the included participants underwent hormone treatment (Martin Ritzén et al., 2007). Danish studies have investigated the effect of the two hormonal treatment methods and found significantly better success rates for testis descent in men treated with HCG (Christiansen et al., 1988, 1992). Thus, we cannot exclude that men within the group of hormonal treatment may differ. Finally, our study is limited by confounder data regarding the mother’s pregnancy being collected by self-report resulting in a relatively large amount of missing data. In order to increase the sample size, we repeated the analyses using imputed data and found the results to be similar to those from the analyses using a reduced sample size.

It is widely acknowledged that a man’s fertility potential cannot be determined by a single semen parameter, thus we also categorized men with and without a history of cryptorchidism as having low, intermediate and high semen quality as previously suggested (Damsgaard et al., 2016). Men with a history of cryptorchidism were almost twice as likely to have low semen quality which potentially affects time to pregnancy and fertility chances (Bonde et al., 1998; Slama, 2002). This is supported by a study by Lee and Coughlin who found lower paternity rates among men with a history of cryptorchidism (Lee and Coughlin, 2001). Based on the distribution of semen quality in our study, we would expect that the same applies for our study population. However, we also found a large overlap in the distribution of semen quality between men with and without a history of cryptorchidism. Cryptorchidism, especially the milder forms, may thus not necessarily lead to reduced semen quality in a given individual and the aetiology of impaired semen quality is multifactorial and influenced by both prenatal and postnatal factors (Sharpe, 2010, 2012).

Conclusion

In conclusion, we observed that men with a history of cryptorchidism were at increased risk of having impaired semen quality reflected in lower total testis volume and sperm counts due to a primary testicular failure. They showed unaltered testosterone levels but higher LH suggesting a subtle Leydig cell failure. Our study group was still young, and it remains to be seen whether they are at increased risk of developing clinical symptoms of Leydig cell failure at a later stage of life, and whether paternity rates will be affected. Semen quality showed a large variation among men with a history of cryptorchidism, and further research is needed to identify the subgroup of boys born with cryptorchidism who are at largest risk of impaired semen quality when reaching adulthood.

Acknowledgements

A special thanks goes to the technical staff at the Department of Growth and Reproduction, who took part in the data collection, and to the study funders.

Authors’ roles

Substantial contribution to conception and design: T.K., A.H.H., L.P. and N.J. Data acquisition: L.P., E.C. and N.J. Data analysis: T.K., A.H.H., L.P., J.H.P. and N.J. Data interpretation: all authors. Drafting the article: T.K., A.H.H., L.P. and N.J. Revising the article critically for important intellectual content: all authors. Final approval of the article: all authors.

Funding

The study received financial support from the Research fund of Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital; the European Union (Contract numbers BMH4-CT96-0314, QLK4-CT-1999-01422, QLK4-CT-2002-00603. FP7/2007-2013, DEER Grant agreement no. 212844); the Danish Ministry of Health; the Danish Environmental Protection Agency; A.P. Møller and wife Chastine McKinney Møllers Foundation; and Svend Andersens Foundation.

Conflict of interest

The authors have nothing to declare. None of the funders had any role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, writing of the article or publication decisions.

References

Akre
O
,
Pettersson
A
,
Richiardi
L.
Risk of contralateral testicular cancer among men with unilaterally undescended testis: a meta analysis
.
Int J Cancer
2009
;
124
:
687
689
.

Andersen
AG
,
Jensen
TK
,
Carlsen
E
,
Jørgensen
N
,
Andersson
AM
,
Krarup
T,
,
Keiding
N
,
Skakkebæk
NE.
High frequency of sub-optimal semen quality in an unselected population of young men
.
Hum Reprod
2000
;
15
:
366
372
.

Andersson
A-M
,
Jørgensen
N
,
Frydelund-Larsen
L
,
Rajpert-De Meyts
E
,
Skakkebæk
NE.
Impaired Leydig cell function in infertile men: a study of 357 idiopathic infertile men and 318 proven fertile controls
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2004
;
89
:
3161
3167
.

Bay
K
,
Virtanen
HE
,
Hartung
S
,
Ivell
R
,
Main
KM
,
Skakkebaek
NE
,
Andersson
AM
,
Toppari
J
,
Boisen
K
,
Chellakooty
M
et al.
Insulin-like factor 3 levels in cord blood and serum from children: effects of age, postnatal hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis activation, and cryptorchidism
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2007
;
92
:
4020
4027
.

Boisen
K
,
Kaleva
M
,
Main
K
,
Virtanen
H
,
Haavisto
A-M
,
Schmidt
I
,
Chellakooty
M
,
Damgaard
I
,
Mau
C
,
Reunanen
M
et al.
Difference in prevalence of congenital cryptorchidism in infants between two Nordic countries
.
Lancet
2004
;
363
:
1264
1269
.

Bonde
JPE
,
Ernst
E
,
Jensen
TK
,
Hjollund
I NH
,
Kolstad
H
,
Henriksen
TB
,
Scheike
T
,
Giwercman
A
,
Olsen
J
,
Skakkebæk
NE.
Relation between semen quality and fertility: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners
.
Lancet
1998
;
352
:
1172
1177
.

Canavese
F
,
Mussa
A
,
Manenti
M
,
Cortese
MG
,
Ferrero
L
,
Tuli
G
,
Macchieraldo
R
,
Lala
R.
Sperm count of young men surgically treated for cryptorchidism in the first and second year of life: fertility is better in children treated at a younger age
.
Eur J Pediatr Surg
2009
;
19
:
388
391
.

Casella
G
,
Berger
R.
Statistical Inference
.
Pacific Grove, CA
:
Duxbury Press
,
2002
.

Chiu
Y-H
,
Edifor
R
,
Rosner
BA
,
Nassan
FL
,
Gaskins
AJ
,
Mínguez-Alarcón
L
,
Williams
PL
,
Tanrikut
C
,
Hauser
R
,
Chavarro
JE.
What does a single semen sample tell you? Implications for male factor infertility research
.
Am J Epidemiol
2017
;
186
:
918
926
.

Christiansen
P
,
Müller
J
,
Buhl
S
,
Hansen
OR
,
Hobollh
N
,
Jacobsen
BB
,
Jørgensen
PH
,
Kastrup
KW
,
Nielsen
K
,
Nielsen
LB
et al.
Treatment of cryptorchidism with human chorionic gonadotropin or gonadotropin releasing hormone: a double-blind controlled study of 243 boys
.
Horm Res Paediatr
1988
;
30
:
187
192
.

Christiansen
P
,
Müller
J
,
Buhl
S
,
Hansen
O
,
Hobolth
N
,
Jacobsen
B
,
Jørgensen
P
,
Kastrup
K
,
Nielsen
K
,
Nielsen
L
et al.
Hormonal treatment of cryptorchidism—hCG or GnRH—a multicentre study
.
Acta Paediatr
1992
;
81
:
605
608
.

Cooper
TG
,
Noonan
E
,
Von Eckardstein
S
,
Auger
J
,
Gordon Baker
HW
,
Behre
HM
,
Haugen
TB
,
Kruger
T
,
Wang
C
,
Mbizvo
MT
et al.
World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics
.
Hum Reprod Update
2010
;
16
:
231
245
.

Cortes
D
,
Kjellberg
EM
,
Breddam
M
,
Thorup
J.
The true incidence of cryptorchidism in Denmark
.
J Urol
2008
;
179
:
314
318
.

Coughlin
MT
,
Bellinger
MF
,
Lee
PA.
Age at unilateral orchiopexy: effect on hormone levels and sperm count in adulthood
.
J Urol
1999
;
162
:
986
988
.

Damsgaard
J
,
Joensen
UN
,
Carlsen
E
,
Erenpreiss
J
,
Blomberg Jensen
M
,
Matulevicius
V
,
Zilaitiene
B
,
Olesen
IA
,
Perheentupa
A
,
Punab
M
et al.
Varicocele is associated with impaired semen quality and reproductive hormone levels: a study of 7035 healthy young men from six European countries
.
Eur Urol
2016
;
70
:
1019
1029
.

de Gouveia Brazao
CA
,
Pierik
FH
,
Erenpreiss
Y
,
Jong
FH
,
Dohle
GR
,
Weber
RFA.
The effect of cryptorchidism on inhibin B in a subfertile population
.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)
2003
;
59
:
136
141
.

Fawzy
F
,
Hussein
A
,
Eid
MM
,
El Kashash
AM
,
Salem
HK.
Cryptorchidism and fertility
.
Clin Med Insights Reprod Heal
2015
;
9
:
CMRH.S25056
.

Feyles
F
,
Peiretti
V
,
Mussa
A
,
Manenti
M
,
Canavese
F
,
Cortese
MG
,
Lala
R.
Improved sperm count and motility in young men surgically treated for cryptorchidism in the first year of life
.
Eur J Pediatr Surg
2014
;
24
:
376
380
.

Griswold
MD.
The central role of Sertoli cells in spermatogenesis
.
Semin Cell Dev Biol
1998
;
9
:
411
416
.

Hadziselimovic
F.
Early successful orchidopexy does not prevent from developing azoospermia
.
Int Braz J Urol
2006
;
32
:
570
573
.

Hart
RJ
,
Doherty
DA
,
McLachlan
RI
,
Walls
ML
,
Keelan
JA
,
Dickinson
JE
,
Skakkebaek
NE
,
Norman
RJ
,
Handelsman
DJ.
Testicular function in a birth cohort of young men
.
Hum Reprod
2015
;
30
:
2713
2724
.

Huff
DS
,
Fenig
DM
,
Canning
DA
,
Carr
MC
,
Zderic
SA
,
Snyder
HM
III
.
Abnormal germ cell development in cryptorchidism
.
Horm Res Paediatr
2001
;
55
:
11
17
.

Hutson
JM
,
Balic
A
,
Nation
T
,
Southwell
B.
Cryptorchidism
.
Semin Pediatr Surg
2010
;
19
:
215
224
.

Jensen
TK
,
Jørgensen
N
,
Asklund
C
,
Carlsen
E
,
Kristensen
TS
,
Holm
M
,
Skakkebæk
NE.
Self-rated health and semen quality among 3,457 young Danish men
.
Fertil Steril
2007
;
88
:
1366
1373
.

Jørgensen
N
,
Joensen
UN
,
Jensen
TK
,
Jensen
MB
,
Almstrup
K
,
Olesen
IA
,
Juul
A
,
Andersson
AM
,
Carlsen
E
,
Petersen
JH
et al.
Human semen quality in the new millennium: a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men
.
BMJ Open
2012
;
2
:
1
13
.

Jørgensen
N
,
Joensen
UN
,
Toppari
J
,
Punab
M
,
Erenpreiss
J
,
Zilaitiene
B
,
Paasch
U
,
Salzbrunn
A
,
Fernandez
MF
,
Virtanen
HE
et al.
Compensated reduction in Leydig cell function is associated with lower semen quality variables: a study of 8182 European young men
.
Hum Reprod
2016
;
31
:
947
957
.

Kollin
C
,
Karpe
B
,
Hesser
U
,
Granholm
T
,
Ritzén
EM.
Surgical treatment of unilaterally undescended testes: testicular growth after randomization to orchiopexy at age 9 months or 3 years
.
J Urol
2007
;
178
:
1589
1593
.

Lee
PA
,
Coughlin
MT.
Fertility after bilateral cryptorchidism
.
Horm Res Paediatr
2001
;
55
:
28
32
.

Martin Ritzén
E
,
Bergh
A
,
Bjerknes
R
,
Christiansen
P
,
Cortes
D
,
Haugen
S
,
Jörgensen
N
,
Kollin
C
,
Lindahl
S
,
Läckgren
G
et al.
Nordic consensus on treatment of undescended testes
.
Acta Paediatr
2007
;
96
:
638
643
.

Menkveld
R
,
Stander
FSH
,
Kotze
TJ
,
Kruger
TF
,
Zyl
JA.
The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria
.
Hum Reprod
1990
;
5
:
586
592
.

Mieusset
R
,
Bujan
L
,
Massat
G
,
Mansat
A
,
Pontonnier
F.
Andrology: clinical and biological characteristics of infertile men with a history of cryptorchidism
.
Hum Reprod
1995
;
10
:
613
619
.

Moretti
E
,
Di Cairano
G
,
Capitani
S
,
Scapigliati
G
,
Baccetti
B
,
Collodel
G.
Cryptorchidism and semen quality: a TEM and molecular study
.
J Androl
2006
;
28
:
194
199
.

Paasch
U
,
Thieme
C
,
Grunewald
S
,
Glander
H-J.
Electronic data base systems support the evaluation of male infertility factors, example cryptorchidism
.
Urol Int
2004
;
72
:
154
161
.

Priskorn
L
,
Jensen
TK
,
Bang
AK
,
Nordkap
L
,
Joensen
UN
,
Lassen
TH
,
Olesen
IA
,
Swan
SH
,
Skakkebaek
NE
,
Jørgensen
N.
Is sedentary lifestyle associated with testicular function? A cross-sectional study of 1,210 men
.
Am J Epidemiol
2016
;
184
:
284
294
.

Priskorn
L
,
Nordkap
L
,
Bang
AK
,
Krause
M
,
Holmboe
SA
,
Egeberg Palme
DL
,
Winge
SB
,
Mørup
N
,
Carlsen
E
,
Joensen
UN
et al.
Average sperm count remains unchanged despite reduction in maternal smoking: results from a large cross-sectional study with annual investigations over 21 years
.
Hum Reprod
2018
;
33
:
998
1008
.

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computering. R Found Stat Comput [Internet]

2019
. https://www.r-project.org/ (date last accessed, 12 June 2020).

Rohayem
J
,
Hauffa
BP
,
Zacharin
M
,
Kliesch
S
,
Zitzmann
M.
Testicular growth and spermatogenesis: new goals for pubertal hormone replacement in boys with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism?—A multicentre prospective study of hCG/rFSH treatment outcomes during adolescence
.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)
2017
;
86
:
75
87
.

Rubin
DB.
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
.
New York
:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
.,
1987
.

Rylander
L
,
Wetterstrand
B
,
Haugen
TB
,
Malm
G
,
Malm
J
,
Bjørsvik
C
,
Henrichsen
T
,
Sæther
T
,
Giwercman
A.
Single semen analysis as a predictor of semen quality: clinical and epidemiological implications
.
Asian J Androl
2009
;
11
:
723
730
.

Sharpe
RM.
Hormones and testis development and the possible adverse effects of environmental chemicals
.
Toxicol Lett
2001
;
120
:
221
232
.

Sharpe
RM.
Environmental/lifestyle effects on spermatogenesis
.
Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci
2010
;
365
:
1697
1712
.

Sharpe
RM.
Sperm counts and fertility in men: a rocky road ahead
.
EMBO Rep
2012
;
13
:
398
403
.

Skakkebaek
NE
,
Rajpert-De Meyts
E
,
Buck Louis
GM
,
Toppari
J
,
Andersson
AM
,
Eisenberg
ML
,
Jensen
TK
,
Jørgensen
N
,
Swan
SH
,
Sapra
KJ
et al.
Male reproductive disorders and fertility trends: influences of environment and genetic susceptibility
.
Physiol Rev
2016
;
96
:
55
97
.

Skakkebæk
NE
,
Rajpert-De Meyts
E
,
Main
KM.
Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects
.
Hum Reprod
2001
;
16
:
972
978
.

Slama
R.
Time to pregnancy and semen parameters: a cross-sectional study among fertile couples from four European cities
.
Hum Reprod
2002
;
17
:
503
515
.

Suomi
AM
,
Main
KM
,
Kaleva
M
,
Schmidt
IM
,
Chellakooty
M
,
Virtanen
HE
,
Boisen
KA
,
Damgaard
IN
,
Kai
CM
,
Skakkebæk
NE
et al.
Hormonal changes in 3-month-old cryptorchid boys
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2006
;
91
:
953
958
.

Taran
I
,
Elder
JS.
Results of orchiopexy for the undescended testis
.
World J Urol
2006
;
24
:
231
239
.

Trsinar
B
,
Muravec
UR.
Fertility potential after unilateral and bilateral orchidopexy for cryptorchidism
.
World J Urol
2009
;
27
:
513
519
.

Tseng
CS
,
Chiang
IN
,
Hong
CH
,
Lu
YC
,
Hong
JH
,
Chang
HC
,
Huang
KH
,
Pu
YS.
Advantage of early orchiopexy for undescended testis: analysis of testicular growth percentage ratio in patients with unilateral undescended testicle
.
Sci Rep
2017
;
7
:
17476
.

van Brakel
J
,
de Muinck Keizer-Schrama
SMPF
,
van Casteren
NJ
,
Hazebroek
FW
,
Dohle
GR
.
Scrotal ultrasound findings in previously congenital and acquired unilateral undescended testes and their contralateral normally descended testis
.
Andrology
2015
;
3
:
888
894
.

van Brakel
J
,
Kranse
R
,
de Muinck Keizer-Schrama
SMPF
,
Hendriks
AEJ
,
de Jong
FH,
,
Bangma
CH
,
Hazebroek
FWJ
,
Dohle
GR.
Fertility potential in men with a history of congenital undescended testes: a long-term follow-up study
.
Andrology
2013
;
1
:
100
108
.

van Brakel
J
,
Kranse
R
,
de Muinck Keizer-Schrama
SMPF
,
Hendriks
AEJ
,
de Jong
FH
,
Hack
WWM
,
van der Voort-Doedens
LM
,
Bangma
CH
,
Hazebroek
FW
,
Dohle
GR.
Fertility potential in a cohort of 65 men with previously acquired undescended testes
.
J Pediatr Surg
2014
;
49
:
599
605
.

van Buuren
S
,
Groothuis-Oudshoorn
K.
mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R
.
J Stat Softw
2011
;
45
:
1
67
.

Vermeulen
A
,
Verdonck
L
,
Kaufman
JM.
A critical evaluation of simple methods for the estimation of free testosterone in serum
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1999
;
84
:
3666
3672
.

Virtanen
HE
,
Bjerknes
R
,
Cortes
D
,
Jørgensen
N
,
Rajpert-De Meyts
E
,
Thorsson
AV
,
Thorup
J
,
Main
KM.
Cryptorchidism: classification, prevalence and long-term consequences
.
Acta Paediatr
2007
;
96
:
611
616
.

Welsh
M
,
Saunders
PTK
,
Fisken
M
,
Scott
HM
,
Hutchison
GR
,
Smith
LB
,
Sharpe
RM.
Identification in rats of a programming window for reproductive tract masculinization, disruption of which leads to hypospadias and cryptorchidism
.
J Clin Invest
2008
;
118
:
1479
1490
.

World Health Organization.

WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen
.
Geneva
: World Health Organization,
2010
.

Author notes

Trine Koch and Ann H. Hansen should be regarded as Joint First Authors.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)