-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Sarah Joseph, The Right to Housing, Discrimination, and the Roma in Slovakia, Human Rights Law Review, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 347–349, https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngi019
Close - Share Icon Share
Extract
L.R. et al v Slovak Republic (31/03) 1 concerned a complaint under the International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination 1966 (CERD) by a number of Roma people regarding the actions of a local council in the Slovak Republic. The factual background to the complaint was as follows. 1800 Roma lived in the district of Dobšiná in appalling conditions. On 20 March 2002, the local council adopted by way of Resolution ‘a plan to construct low-cost housing for the Roma inhabitants of the town’. 2 In response, 2700 inhabitants of Dobšiná presented a petition opposing the Resolution, claiming that implementation of the housing plan would ‘lead to an influx of inadaptable citizens of Gypsy origin from the surrounding villages, even from other districts and regions’. 3 In August 2002, the Council unanimously voted to revoke the earlier Resolution by way of a second Resolution, which referred to the petition. 4 The Resolution, however, did not explicitly refer to the Roma. Rather, it referred to ‘inadaptable citizens’. The ‘petitioners’ (that is, those bringing the complaint to CERD, not those who signed the aforementioned petition) alleged that the cancellation of the first Resolution was an act of racial discrimination, particularly as it was motivated by a discriminatory petition. They had earlier unsuccessfully sought redress via local remedies.
