1-20 of 2352
Sort by
Image
Published: 25 April 2025
Figure 2. Effects of the humility experimental condition on proposed mediators. Means and 95% confidence intervals. Note . The humility experimental condition significantly predicts perceptions of warmth, competence, and cognitive reactance, but not expectancy violations (not shown). A bar graph showing
Image
Published: 25 April 2025
Figure 1. Effects of the humility experimental manipulation on willingness to engage. Means and 95% confidence intervals. Note. The humility experimental manipulation significantly predicts willingness to engage, but not affective or perceived polarization (not shown). A bar graph showing that willingne
Journal Article
Natalie Jomini Stroud and Caroline Murray
Human Communication Research, hqaf007, https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaf007
Published: 25 April 2025
Image
Published: 09 April 2025
Figure 1. Conceptual model of Study 1 hypotheses. Note. The light dashed lines for H3 denote the component paths of an indirect effect; the light dotted line for H4 denotes the expected moderation of the relationship between metastereotype valence and felt personal responsibility and the associated indirec
Image
Published: 09 April 2025
Figure 4. Men’s concern for group image by metastereotype condition, moderated by metastereotype personalization (Study 2).
Image
Published: 09 April 2025
Figure 3. Conceptual model of Study 2 hypotheses and research questions. Note. The light dashed lines for H4 and H7 denote the component paths of indirect effects; the light dotted lines for H8 denote the expected moderation of these indirect paths (i.e., moderated mediation).
Image
Published: 09 April 2025
Figure 5. Unstandardized direct effect of metastereotype condition on men’s intent to directly confront sexism, moderated by metastereotype personalization (Study 2).
Journal Article
Craig Fowler and others
Human Communication Research, hqaf009, https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaf009
Published: 09 April 2025
Image
Published: 09 April 2025
Figure 2 Women’s felt personal responsibility for addressing sexism by metastereotype condition, moderated by metastereotype personalization (Study 1).
Image
Published: 03 April 2025
Figure 1. Descriptive statistics for encouragement and forced-choice by condition. (a) Parents’ encouragement ratings by video type by condition. (b) Percentage of parents selecting nonracial vs. racial shows by condition. (a) Bar graph representation of the descriptive statistics (means, standard deviatio
Journal Article
AnneMarie K McClain and Marie-Louise Mares
Human Communication Research, hqaf006, https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaf006
Published: 03 April 2025
Image
Published: 28 March 2025
Figure 4. Person-specific estimated factor scores (500 iterations) for random effects: daily social media use → daily body image satisfaction ( SMit → BIit ).
Image
Published: 28 March 2025
Figure 1. Summary of results. Note . This figure summarizes the results of the dynamic fixed-effects (FE) regression models examining the lagged reciprocal effects between self-views and avatar-based self-presentation. Values represent unstandardized coefficients, with standardized coefficients in parentheses
Image
Published: 28 March 2025
Figure 1. Dynamic structural equation model. SM, social media; BI, body image.
Image
Published: 28 March 2025
Figure 3. Time series for social media use: participant #63 Note. The blue horizontal line shows participant #63’s average social media use across 30 days [mean ( M ) = 0.301 hr], which is low. The red line shows participant #63’s lack of social media use inertia as slight elevations in her use do not ling
Journal Article
HyunYi Cho and others
Human Communication Research, Volume 51, Issue 2, April 2025, Pages 57–79, https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaf004
Published: 28 March 2025
Journal Article
Hyun Suk Kim and others
Human Communication Research, hqaf005, https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaf005
Published: 28 March 2025
Image
Published: 28 March 2025
Figure 1. Forest plot of the effects of interventions on critical beliefs.
Journal Article
Megan A Vendemia and others
Human Communication Research, hqaf001, https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaf001
Published: 28 March 2025
Image
Published: 28 March 2025
Figure 2. Time series for social media use: participant #42. Note. The blue horizontal line shows participant #42’s average social media use across 30 days [mean ( M ) = 2.064 hr]. The red line shows participant #42’s social media use day to day as it deviates from her average or typical use. The elevated