Abstract

Background and Objectives

We tested feasibility and preliminary benefits of a free mobile app-delivered mindfulness-based intervention for stress among dementia caregivers (i.e., Healthy Minds Program for Caregivers [HMP-C]).

Research Design and Methods

Single-blind Stage 1b pilot randomized controlled trial compared 12 weeks of HMP-C (n = 47) with a dose-matched education podcast control (n = 48; Wellness App [WA]). T-tests examined between-group differences.

Results

Feasibility benchmarks were met for acceptability (90% eligible enrolled), demand (95% completed post-tests), and data collection (100% measures complete). Treatment satisfaction was sufficient for HMP-C. Adherence was lower than benchmarks (>52.5 minutes weekly) for HMP-C (57%) and WA (59%). Mechanistic targets of mindfulness (p < .001; d = -1.21) and positive aspects of caregiving (p < .001; d = -0.92) showed large pre-post improvements in the HMP-C group. Mechanistic validity was established through significant correlations between change in stress and change in mindfulness (r =-.40, p =.006) and positive aspects of caregiving (r =-.49, p =.001). Pre-post improvements in HMP-C were not statistically significantly compared with WA for stress (p = .097; d = -0.35), depression (p = .110; d = -0.34), or anxiety (p = .237; d = -0.25).

Discussion and Implications

The current study demonstrated feasibility and mechanistic target engagement and validity for HMP-C. As expected in an underpowered feasibility trial, clinical outcomes did not improve more than control, but trends favored HMP-C. Together, findings demonstrate that a fully powered Stage 2 trial is warranted to test the efficacy of HMP-C compared with WA.

Information Accepted manuscripts
Accepted manuscripts are PDF versions of the author’s final manuscript, as accepted for publication by the journal but prior to copyediting or typesetting. They can be cited using the author(s), article title, journal title, year of online publication, and DOI. They will be replaced by the final typeset articles, which may therefore contain changes. The DOI will remain the same throughout.
This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)
You do not currently have access to this article.