This editorial refers to ‘Global, regional, and national burden of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter from 1990 to 2021: sex differences and global burden projections to 2046—a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021’, by S. Tan et al., https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf027.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are prevalent cardiac arrhythmias that significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality worldwide.1 Recent epidemiological studies indicate a concerning upward trend in the global burden of AF/AFL.2–4 In this issue of Europace, Tan et al.5 present a comprehensive analysis of the growing epidemiological burden of these conditions over the past three decades, highlighting significant sex differences in prevalence and incidence, as well as projections for future trends. The findings from this study, derived from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) programme, have profound implications for public health strategies aimed at reducing the burden of AF/AFL. Indeed, their results reveal that the epidemiological burden of AF/AFL is particularly pronounced in regions with lower socio-demographic index, where healthcare resources may be limited. Furthermore, while men generally exhibit higher incidence rates of AF/AFL, women are experiencing a faster increase in disease burden.5 This trend raises critical concerns about the unique challenges women face in accessing timely treatment and effective disease management. Moreover, Tan et al.5 identify hypertension, increased body mass index, and alcohol use as primary risk factors contributing to AF/AFL. Intriguingly, the epidemiological burden associated with BMI is more pronounced among women, suggesting an urgent need for targeted interventions within this demographic scenario.5

Overall, the investigation by Tan et al.5 provides a worrying projection for future years regarding the management of AF/AFL but also offers significant and timely potential solutions for implementing current healthcare strategies for patients with these arrhythmias.5 While primary prevention remains the best treatment strategy,6 there is an urgent need to drastically implement cardiovascular preventive measures, especially in low- and middle-income regions where healthcare resources are scarce.7 To reduce the impact of the epidemiological burden of AF/AFL on healthcare systems, intensification and widespread diffusion of public health initiatives promoting a healthy diet, regular physical activity, moderation of alcohol consumption, and smoking cessation must be the first step to further improve overall cardiovascular health and reduce the AF/AFL epidemiological burden.8

Moreover, understanding where the epidemiological burden of AF/AFL is likely to increase over the coming years will allow for prioritization of intervention in these areas, particularly as populations continue to age.9 Additionally, addressing sex-specific needs is fundamental; indeed, women often face unique barriers within healthcare systems that may influence their health outcomes. Furthermore, investigating biological differences—such as the impact of menopause on AF/AFL—as well as how sex differences affect treatment outcomes will be crucial for optimizing management strategies tailored specifically for female patients.10,11 Future studies should also assess whether simplifying risk stratification for stroke, as recommended by the latest European Society of Cardiology guidelines using the CHA2DS2-VA score, will effectively streamline decision-making for thromboprophylaxis and enhance the use of oral anticoagulation in AF patients deemed ‘truly low-risk’.12–14

Although the GBD study provided modelled estimates and not real data, Tan et al.’s study provides valuable insights into trends and projections regarding AF/AFL epidemiological burden, several areas warrant further investigation.5 Public health efforts must focus on education and screening to ensure equitable access to modern pharmacological and electrophysiological treatments.5 To this regard, a holistic approach to managing AF/AFL, considering comorbidities, cognitive function, and frailty, emerges as a viable strategy for developing comprehensive care plans tailored to individual patient needs.12,15 The increasing trend in AF/AFL cases signifies not only an urgent public health concern but also an opportunity for innovation in healthcare delivery (Figure 1). As we strive for better health outcomes for all patients affected by these conditions, it is essential to prioritize efforts that address both gender disparities and broader determinants of health influencing atrial fibrillation and flutter globally.

Evolving epidemiological landscape of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. AF, atrial fibrillation; AFL, atrial flutter.
Figure 1

Evolving epidemiological landscape of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. AF, atrial fibrillation; AFL, atrial flutter.

In conclusion, Tan et al.’s study underscores the critical need for targeted interventions that consider sex differences in AF/AFL epidemiological burden, as well highlights the importance of proactive public health strategies aimed at reducing this growing global health challenge. By focusing on prevention, improving access to care, and tailoring management approaches to individual patient needs—particularly among women—we can significantly alleviate the epidemiological burden of AF and AFL in the years to come.

Funding

None.

Data availability

No data has been used or generated for the present manuscript.

References

1

Ohlrogge
 
AH
,
Brederecke
 
J
,
Schnabel
 
RB
.
Global burden of atrial fibrillation and flutter by national income: results from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 database
.
J Am Heart Assoc
 
2023
;
12
:
e030438
.

2

Dong
 
X-J
,
Wang
 
B-B
,
Hou
 
F-F
,
Jiao
 
Y
,
Li
 
H-W
,
Lv
 
S-P
 et al.  
Global burden of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter and its attributable risk factors from 1990 to 2019
.
Europace
 
2023
;
25
:
793
803
.

3

Cheng
 
S
,
He
 
J
,
Han
 
Y
,
Han
 
S
,
Li
 
P
,
Liao
 
H
 et al.  
Global burden of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter and its attributable risk factors from 1990 to 2021
.
Europace
 
2024
;
26
:
euae195
.

4

Zuin
 
M
,
Malagù
 
M
,
Vitali
 
F
,
Balla
 
C
,
De Raffele
 
M
,
Ferrari
 
R
 et al.  
Trends in atrial fibrillation-related mortality in Europe, 2008–2019
.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes
 
2024
;
10
:
467
78
.

5

Tan
 
S
,
Zhou
 
J
,
Veang
 
T
,
Lin
 
Q
,
Liu
 
Q
.
Global, regional, and national burden of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter from 1990 to 2021: sex differences and global burden projections to 2046—a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
.
Europace
 
2025
.

6

Boriani
 
G
,
Proietti
 
M
.
Atrial fibrillation prevention: an appraisal of current evidence
.
Heart
 
2018
;
104
:
882
7
.

7

Chung
 
SC
,
Sofat
 
R
,
Acosta-Mena
 
D
,
Taylor
 
JA
,
Lambiase
 
PD
,
Casas
 
JP
 et al.  
Atrial fibrillation epidemiology, disparity and healthcare contacts: a population-wide study of 5.6 million individuals
.
Lancet Reg Health Eur
 
2021
;
7
:
100157
.

8

Gorenek
 
B
,
Pelliccia
 
A
,
Benjamin
 
EJ
,
Boriani
 
G
,
Crijns
 
HJ
,
Fogel
 
RI
 et al.  
European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (EACPR) position paper on how to prevent atrial fibrillation endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)
.
Europace
 
2017
;
19
:
190
225
.

9

Kotalczyk
 
A
,
Lip
 
GYH
.
Disparities in atrial fibrillation: a call for holistic care
.
Lancet Reg Health Eur
 
2021
;
7
:
100160
.

10

Westerman
 
S
,
Wenger
 
N
.
Gender differences in atrial fibrillation: a review of epidemiology, management, and outcomes
.
Curr Cardiol Rev
 
2019
;
15
:
136
44
.

11

Armentaro
 
G
,
Pastori
 
D
,
Castagna
 
A
,
Condoleo
 
V
,
Cassano
 
V
,
Pastura
 
CA
 et al.  
Sex-based differences in the comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly hospitalized patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
.
Eur J Intern Med
 
2024
;
125
:
74
81
.

12

Rienstra
 
M
,
Tzeis
 
S
,
Bunting
 
KV
,
Caso
 
V
,
Crijns
 
HJGM
,
De Potter
 
TJR
 et al.  
Spotlight on the 2024 ESC/EACTS management of atrial fibrillation guidelines: 10 novel key aspects
.
Europace
 
2024
;
26
:
euae298
.

13

Boriani
 
G
,
Vitolo
 
M
,
Mei
 
DA
.
CHA2DS2-VA instead of CHA2DS2-VASc for stroke risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation: not just a matter of sex
.
Europace
 
2024
;
26
:
euae281
.

14

Yoshimura
 
H
,
Providencia
 
R
,
Finan
 
C
,
Schmidt
 
AF
,
Lip
 
GYH
.
Refining the CHA2DS2VASc risk stratification scheme: shall we drop the sex category criterion?
 
Europace
 
2024
;
26
:
euae280
.

15

Lip
 
GYH
,
Proietti
 
M
,
Potpara
 
T
,
Mansour
 
M
,
Savelieva
 
I
,
Tse
 
HF
 et al.  
Atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention: 25 years of research at EP Europace journal
.
Europace
 
2023
;
25
:
euad226
.

Author notes

The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of Europace or of the European Society of Cardiology.

Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflict of interests related to the present article. G.B. reported small speaker fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, and Sanofi outside of the submitted work. G.B. is the principal investigator of the ARISTOTELES project (Applying ARtificial Intelligence to define clinical trajectorieS for personalized predicTiOn and early deTEction of comorbidity and muLtimorbidity pattErnS) that received funding from the European Union within the Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant no. 101080189). The other authors did not report conflicts of interest to disclose outside of the submitted work.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.