Abstract

Aims

Despite catheter ablation (CA) has become an accepted treatment option for symptomatic, drug-resistant atrial fibrillation (AF), the safety of this procedure continues to be cause for concern. The aim of the present study was to assess the incidence of complications with permanent sequelae of CA for AF using open-irrigated catheters in a contemporary, unselected population of consecutive patients.

Methods and results

From 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2011, data from 2167 consecutive patients who underwent CA for AF using an open-irrigated catheter in 29 Italian centres were collected. All the complications occurring to the patient from admission to the 30th post-procedural day were recorded. No procedure-related death was observed. Complications occurred in 81 patients (3.7%): 46 patients (2.1%) suffered vascular access complications; 13 patients (0.6%) cardiac tamponade, successfully drained in all the cases; six patients (0.3%) arterial thromboembolism (four transient ischaemic attack and two ischaemic strokes); five (0.2%) patients conservatively treated pericardial effusion; three patients (0.1%) phrenic nerve paralysis; three patients (0.1%) pericarditis; three patients (0.1%) haemothorax, and two patients (0.1%) other isolated adverse events. At multivariate analysis, only female sex [odds ratio (OR) 2.5, confidence interval (CI): 1.5–3.7, P < 001] and the operator experience (OR 0.5, CI: 0.4–0.7, P < 001) related to the complications. Only five (0.2%) patients developed permanent sequelae from their complications.

Conclusion

Catheter ablation for AF with the use of open-irrigated catheters is currently affected by a very low rate of complications leading to permanent sequelae.

What's new?

  • This is the first multicentre study specifically aimed at collecting data regarding the incidence of complications with permanent sequelae in an unselected population of patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation by means of open-irrigated catheters.

  • No procedure-related death was reported. Out of a cumulative complication rate of 3.7%, only 0.2% of the patients developed permanent sequelae.

  • Complications were more frequent when catheter ablation was performed in females and by less experienced operators.

Introduction

Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is a well-established treatment option for recurrent, symptomatic, drug-resistant AF.1,2 Despite the satisfactory results justifying3–5 the recommendation for CA by international guidelines in selected patients, the safety of this procedure remains cause for concern.1,2,6 Previous studies reported a rate of complications ranging from 3.5 to 6.3%.7–12 These reports, however, gathered events with extremely different outcomes: from groin haematomas requiring few days of rest to pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis with pulmonary distress and thrombo-embolic events leading to permanent disability. Only one study specifically focused on complications and reported prevalence and causes of fatal outcome following CA of AF.13 Thus, the effect on prognosis of complications recorded during CA for AF is unknown. Open-irrigated catheters (OIC) are widely used for radiofrequency CA14 in particular of AF.15–17 In fact, OIC overcome some limitations of 4 and 8 mm radiofrequency catheter, such as coagulum formation and insufficient power delivery in areas of low blood flow. However, concern has been raised regarding the safety of OIC, especially when used with high power, due to an increased occurrence of cardiovascular and gastrointestinal complications.15

The aim of the present study was to assess the incidence of complications with permanent sequelae of CA for AF using OIC in a contemporary population of consecutive patients.

Methods

Study population

We prospectively collected clinical and procedural data concerning consecutive patients who underwent CA for AF in 29 Italian electrophysiology laboratories between 1 January and 31 December 2011.18 In 2167 of these patients, CA was performed by using an OIC and they represented our study population. This observational study was approved by the local institutional review committees, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Anticoagulation

Most of the patients were on oral anticoagulants (dicumarol or acenocoumarol) with a therapeutic international normalized ratio >2.0 for at least 4 weeks preceding the procedure, or performed transoesophageal echocardiographic assessment to exclude the presence of left atrial thrombus. Oral anticoagulants were withdrawn 2 or 3 days before ablation, and substituted with low-molecular-weight heparin until 12 h before the procedure. Unfractionated heparin infusion was started immediately after transseptal catheterization, to maintain the mean activated clotting time (ACT) between 300 and 400 s. Low-molecular-weight heparin was restarted 4–6 h after sheaths removal, and continued until oral anticoagulant therapy started on the same day of the procedure reached the therapeutic target.

Ablation

All ablation strategies aiming at isolating or encircling the PVs were included in the Registry. Additional linear lesions in the right or left atrium were also allowed. For the purpose of this study, we report data only on CA procedures performed by means of OIC [Navistar®, ThermoCool®, or ThermoCool SF® (Biosense Webster Inc.) or Coolpath® or Cooflex® (St Jude Medical Inc. Endocardial Solutions)]. Radiofrequency pulses were delivered with a temperature setting of 45°C and radiofrequency energy up to 50 W. In several centres, when ablation was performed in the posterior wall of the left atrium, the radiofrequency power was usually reduced to 25 W to avoid the risk of injuring the adjacent structures. In the majority of centres, ablation was guided by a three-dimensional non-fluoroscopic mapping system [Carto™ system (Biosense Webster Inc.) or EnSite NavX™ (St Jude Medical Inc. Endocardial Solutions)] creating an electroanatomical map of left atrium and PVs with or without the integration of left atrial computed tomography or magnetic resonance scans.

A circular mapping catheter was widely used to confirm PV's electrophysiological isolation and intracardiac echo imaging was used to guide the PV antrum isolation in the two laboratories.

Definitions

Complications were defined as all unexpected events which required intervention or prolonged hospital stay beyond the scheduled period. Early tachyarrhythmias (AF or atrial tachycardia/flutter) were not included even if requiring cardioversion.

Complications with permanent sequelae were defined as those leading to death or causing permanent harm not resolving within 30 days from CA.

Procedures were done by different operators. Personal background as first operator was considered to classify the operator's experience: <100 procedures; between 101 and 500 procedures; and >500 procedures.

Data collection

The investigators were provided with the same data sheet for the collection of specific information on each ablation procedure. Data were collected retrospectively by each investigator, and sent via a computerized database in Excel format (Windows 7, XP, or Mac) to the coordinating centre for analysis. Each author took responsibility for data integrity.

The Registry considered complications occurring from hospital admission of the patient to the 30th post-procedural day. Complications occurring after the hospital stay and clinical status of patients developing complications were collected through outpatient visit or telephone interview.

Statistical analysis

Normally distributed continuous variables were expressed as means (SD) and compared with Student's t-test. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Skewed variables were expressed as medians (quartiles) and compared with the rank-sum test. Categorical variables were presented as counts and percentages, and compared with χ2 or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. A logistic regression model was designed and stepwise backward selection was performed to identify significant and independent predictors of complications. Independent variables were chosen when a P < 0.10 emerged at univariate analysis. The starting model included: gender; age; and operator's experience. A significant increase in risk was obtained if the 95% confidence interval (CI) exceeded 1 and the P value of the Wald test was <0.05.

Analysis was performed by means of SPSS (version 11.0, SPSS Inc.).

Results

Clinical and procedural data

The final patient cohort included 2167 consecutive patients. Baseline clinical characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1, while the procedural data are listed in Table 2.

Table 1

Baseline clinical characteristics of the 2167 enroled patients

Male gender (%)74.8
Age (years)60 (52–67)
Duration of AF history (years)3.0 (2–6)
Arrhythmic profile (%)
 Paroxysmal AF52.0
 Persistent AF27.3
 Permanent AF20.7
CHADS2 score1 (0–1)
Mean left atrial diameter (mm)42.0 (40–46)
Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (%)57.4 (6.7)
Male gender (%)74.8
Age (years)60 (52–67)
Duration of AF history (years)3.0 (2–6)
Arrhythmic profile (%)
 Paroxysmal AF52.0
 Persistent AF27.3
 Permanent AF20.7
CHADS2 score1 (0–1)
Mean left atrial diameter (mm)42.0 (40–46)
Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (%)57.4 (6.7)

Continuous variables are presented as mean (SD) or median (25–75 percentiles).

AF, atrial fibrillation; REDO, patients who had already undergone PV catheter ablation.

Table 1

Baseline clinical characteristics of the 2167 enroled patients

Male gender (%)74.8
Age (years)60 (52–67)
Duration of AF history (years)3.0 (2–6)
Arrhythmic profile (%)
 Paroxysmal AF52.0
 Persistent AF27.3
 Permanent AF20.7
CHADS2 score1 (0–1)
Mean left atrial diameter (mm)42.0 (40–46)
Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (%)57.4 (6.7)
Male gender (%)74.8
Age (years)60 (52–67)
Duration of AF history (years)3.0 (2–6)
Arrhythmic profile (%)
 Paroxysmal AF52.0
 Persistent AF27.3
 Permanent AF20.7
CHADS2 score1 (0–1)
Mean left atrial diameter (mm)42.0 (40–46)
Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (%)57.4 (6.7)

Continuous variables are presented as mean (SD) or median (25–75 percentiles).

AF, atrial fibrillation; REDO, patients who had already undergone PV catheter ablation.

Table 2

Procedural data of the 2167 enroled patients

Pre-ablation imaging (%)
 MRI13.0
 CT22.0
 TEE49.0
Mapping system (%)
 None7.0
 CARTO56.9
 NavX36.0
 Other0.1
Number of vascular accesses3.0 (3–5)
Number of transseptal punctures1 (1–1)
Number of ablated PVs4 (4–4)
CTI ablation (%)19.2
Mitral to inferior left PV isthmus ablation (%)40.3
Left atrial roof ablation (%)43.1
Duration of fluoroscopy exposure (minutes)a22 (13–43)
Duration of RF delivery (minutes)b31 (24–39)
Ongoing warfarin (%)6.0
Learning curve level (%)
 ≤100 patients6.0
 101–500 patients22.0
 ≥501 patients70.0
Pre-ablation imaging (%)
 MRI13.0
 CT22.0
 TEE49.0
Mapping system (%)
 None7.0
 CARTO56.9
 NavX36.0
 Other0.1
Number of vascular accesses3.0 (3–5)
Number of transseptal punctures1 (1–1)
Number of ablated PVs4 (4–4)
CTI ablation (%)19.2
Mitral to inferior left PV isthmus ablation (%)40.3
Left atrial roof ablation (%)43.1
Duration of fluoroscopy exposure (minutes)a22 (13–43)
Duration of RF delivery (minutes)b31 (24–39)
Ongoing warfarin (%)6.0
Learning curve level (%)
 ≤100 patients6.0
 101–500 patients22.0
 ≥501 patients70.0

Continuous variables are presented as mean (SD) or median (25–75 percentiles).

aAnalysis based on 1920 subjects.

bAnalysis based on 1775 subjects.

MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CT, computed tomography; CTI, cavotricuspid isthmus; LA, left atrium; PV, pulmonary vein; RF, radiofrequency; TEE, transoesophageal echocardiography.

Table 2

Procedural data of the 2167 enroled patients

Pre-ablation imaging (%)
 MRI13.0
 CT22.0
 TEE49.0
Mapping system (%)
 None7.0
 CARTO56.9
 NavX36.0
 Other0.1
Number of vascular accesses3.0 (3–5)
Number of transseptal punctures1 (1–1)
Number of ablated PVs4 (4–4)
CTI ablation (%)19.2
Mitral to inferior left PV isthmus ablation (%)40.3
Left atrial roof ablation (%)43.1
Duration of fluoroscopy exposure (minutes)a22 (13–43)
Duration of RF delivery (minutes)b31 (24–39)
Ongoing warfarin (%)6.0
Learning curve level (%)
 ≤100 patients6.0
 101–500 patients22.0
 ≥501 patients70.0
Pre-ablation imaging (%)
 MRI13.0
 CT22.0
 TEE49.0
Mapping system (%)
 None7.0
 CARTO56.9
 NavX36.0
 Other0.1
Number of vascular accesses3.0 (3–5)
Number of transseptal punctures1 (1–1)
Number of ablated PVs4 (4–4)
CTI ablation (%)19.2
Mitral to inferior left PV isthmus ablation (%)40.3
Left atrial roof ablation (%)43.1
Duration of fluoroscopy exposure (minutes)a22 (13–43)
Duration of RF delivery (minutes)b31 (24–39)
Ongoing warfarin (%)6.0
Learning curve level (%)
 ≤100 patients6.0
 101–500 patients22.0
 ≥501 patients70.0

Continuous variables are presented as mean (SD) or median (25–75 percentiles).

aAnalysis based on 1920 subjects.

bAnalysis based on 1775 subjects.

MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CT, computed tomography; CTI, cavotricuspid isthmus; LA, left atrium; PV, pulmonary vein; RF, radiofrequency; TEE, transoesophageal echocardiography.

Complications

No procedure-related death was observed. Complications occurred in 81 patients (3.7%): 46 patients (2.1%) suffered vascular access complications; 13 patients (0.6%) developed cardiac tamponade, successfully drained in all the cases; six patients (0.3%) had arterial thromboembolism (four transient ischaemic attack and two ischaemic strokes); five patients (0.2%) presented pericardial effusion not requiring specific intervention; three patients (0.1%) had phrenic nerve paralysis during right PV isolation; three patients (0.1%) had pericarditis; three patients (0.1%) had haemothorax requiring drainage in two cases. Other isolated but serious adverse events were documented in two patients (0.1%): haemorrhagic stroke in one; transient ST elevation in one.

In Table 3, clinical and procedural characteristic of patients with and without complications are shown. At univariate analysis, patients with complications were older and more frequently females, and the ablation was less frequently performed by the experienced operators. At multivariate analysis, female gender [odds ratio (OR) 2.5, CI: 1.5–3.7, P < 001] predicted complications, while higher operator experience (OR 0.5, CI: 0.4–0.7, P < 001) inversely related to complications.

Table 3

Univariate analysis for comparisons between patients with and without complications

No complications N = 2084Complications N = 81P
Age (years)60 (53–66)64 (60–68)0.03
Male gender (%)72.753.1<0.001
CHADS2 score1 (0–1)1 (0–1)0.49
Arrhythmic profile (%)
 Paroxysmal51.761.70.50
 Persistent27.621.0
 Permanent20.717.3
Duration of AF history (years)4 (2–6)3 (2–5)0.12
Mean left atrial diameter (mm)41 (40–45)42 (40–45)0.25
Left ventricular ejection fraction <55% (%)18.014.80.27
Pre-ablation imaging (%)
 TEE49.044.40.36
 MRI13.08.6
 CT23.328.4
ICE (%)12.716.00.67
Mapping system (%)
 None7.16.20.92
 CARTO56.955.5
 NavX35.938.3
 Other0.10
Number of vascular accesses3 (3–5)3 (3–4)0.34
Number of transseptal punctures1 (1–1)1 (1–1)0.38
Number of isolated PV4 (4–4)4 (4–4)0.73
CTI ablation (%)19.121.00.68
Mitral to inferior isthmus ablation (%)40.633.30.19
Left atrial roof ablation (%)43.434.60.11
Duration of fluoroscopy exposure (minutes)21 (13–41)33 (14–49)0.23
Duration of RF delivery (minutes)30 (24–40)33 (24–38)0.11
Ongoing warfarin (%)5.76.11.0
Learning curve level (%)
 <100 patients5.711.1<0.001
 101–500 patients21.535.8
 >501 patients72.853.1
No complications N = 2084Complications N = 81P
Age (years)60 (53–66)64 (60–68)0.03
Male gender (%)72.753.1<0.001
CHADS2 score1 (0–1)1 (0–1)0.49
Arrhythmic profile (%)
 Paroxysmal51.761.70.50
 Persistent27.621.0
 Permanent20.717.3
Duration of AF history (years)4 (2–6)3 (2–5)0.12
Mean left atrial diameter (mm)41 (40–45)42 (40–45)0.25
Left ventricular ejection fraction <55% (%)18.014.80.27
Pre-ablation imaging (%)
 TEE49.044.40.36
 MRI13.08.6
 CT23.328.4
ICE (%)12.716.00.67
Mapping system (%)
 None7.16.20.92
 CARTO56.955.5
 NavX35.938.3
 Other0.10
Number of vascular accesses3 (3–5)3 (3–4)0.34
Number of transseptal punctures1 (1–1)1 (1–1)0.38
Number of isolated PV4 (4–4)4 (4–4)0.73
CTI ablation (%)19.121.00.68
Mitral to inferior isthmus ablation (%)40.633.30.19
Left atrial roof ablation (%)43.434.60.11
Duration of fluoroscopy exposure (minutes)21 (13–41)33 (14–49)0.23
Duration of RF delivery (minutes)30 (24–40)33 (24–38)0.11
Ongoing warfarin (%)5.76.11.0
Learning curve level (%)
 <100 patients5.711.1<0.001
 101–500 patients21.535.8
 >501 patients72.853.1

MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CT, computed tomography; CTI, cavotricuspid isthmus; LA, left atrium; PV, pulmonary vein; RF, radiofrequency; TEE, transoesophageal echocardiography.

Table 3

Univariate analysis for comparisons between patients with and without complications

No complications N = 2084Complications N = 81P
Age (years)60 (53–66)64 (60–68)0.03
Male gender (%)72.753.1<0.001
CHADS2 score1 (0–1)1 (0–1)0.49
Arrhythmic profile (%)
 Paroxysmal51.761.70.50
 Persistent27.621.0
 Permanent20.717.3
Duration of AF history (years)4 (2–6)3 (2–5)0.12
Mean left atrial diameter (mm)41 (40–45)42 (40–45)0.25
Left ventricular ejection fraction <55% (%)18.014.80.27
Pre-ablation imaging (%)
 TEE49.044.40.36
 MRI13.08.6
 CT23.328.4
ICE (%)12.716.00.67
Mapping system (%)
 None7.16.20.92
 CARTO56.955.5
 NavX35.938.3
 Other0.10
Number of vascular accesses3 (3–5)3 (3–4)0.34
Number of transseptal punctures1 (1–1)1 (1–1)0.38
Number of isolated PV4 (4–4)4 (4–4)0.73
CTI ablation (%)19.121.00.68
Mitral to inferior isthmus ablation (%)40.633.30.19
Left atrial roof ablation (%)43.434.60.11
Duration of fluoroscopy exposure (minutes)21 (13–41)33 (14–49)0.23
Duration of RF delivery (minutes)30 (24–40)33 (24–38)0.11
Ongoing warfarin (%)5.76.11.0
Learning curve level (%)
 <100 patients5.711.1<0.001
 101–500 patients21.535.8
 >501 patients72.853.1
No complications N = 2084Complications N = 81P
Age (years)60 (53–66)64 (60–68)0.03
Male gender (%)72.753.1<0.001
CHADS2 score1 (0–1)1 (0–1)0.49
Arrhythmic profile (%)
 Paroxysmal51.761.70.50
 Persistent27.621.0
 Permanent20.717.3
Duration of AF history (years)4 (2–6)3 (2–5)0.12
Mean left atrial diameter (mm)41 (40–45)42 (40–45)0.25
Left ventricular ejection fraction <55% (%)18.014.80.27
Pre-ablation imaging (%)
 TEE49.044.40.36
 MRI13.08.6
 CT23.328.4
ICE (%)12.716.00.67
Mapping system (%)
 None7.16.20.92
 CARTO56.955.5
 NavX35.938.3
 Other0.10
Number of vascular accesses3 (3–5)3 (3–4)0.34
Number of transseptal punctures1 (1–1)1 (1–1)0.38
Number of isolated PV4 (4–4)4 (4–4)0.73
CTI ablation (%)19.121.00.68
Mitral to inferior isthmus ablation (%)40.633.30.19
Left atrial roof ablation (%)43.434.60.11
Duration of fluoroscopy exposure (minutes)21 (13–41)33 (14–49)0.23
Duration of RF delivery (minutes)30 (24–40)33 (24–38)0.11
Ongoing warfarin (%)5.76.11.0
Learning curve level (%)
 <100 patients5.711.1<0.001
 101–500 patients21.535.8
 >501 patients72.853.1

MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CT, computed tomography; CTI, cavotricuspid isthmus; LA, left atrium; PV, pulmonary vein; RF, radiofrequency; TEE, transoesophageal echocardiography.

Complications with permanent sequelae

In five patients (0.2%) a complication with a permanent sequelae was observed: three permanent neurological sequelae (two ischaemic and one haemorrhagic stroke), and two permanent symptomatic phrenic nerve palsy. Clinical and procedural characteristics of patients with permanent complications are presented in Table 4.

Table 4

Clinical and procedural characteristics of the five patients with permanent complications

ComplicationGenderAgeCHADS2Type of AFHypertensionCHFDiabetesPrevious stroke/TIA
#1PNPFemale602ParoxysmalYesNoYesNo
#2PNPFemale621ParoxysmalYesNoNoNo
#3Haemorrhagic strokeMale691PersistentNoNoNoNo
#4Ischaemic strokeFemale721PersistentYesNoNoNo
#5Ischaemic strokeFemale756PersistentYesNoYesYes
ComplicationGenderAgeCHADS2Type of AFHypertensionCHFDiabetesPrevious stroke/TIA
#1PNPFemale602ParoxysmalYesNoYesNo
#2PNPFemale621ParoxysmalYesNoNoNo
#3Haemorrhagic strokeMale691PersistentNoNoNoNo
#4Ischaemic strokeFemale721PersistentYesNoNoNo
#5Ischaemic strokeFemale756PersistentYesNoYesYes

PNP, phrenic nerve palsy; AF, atrial fibrillation; CHF, congestive heart failure; TIA, transient ischaemic attack.

Table 4

Clinical and procedural characteristics of the five patients with permanent complications

ComplicationGenderAgeCHADS2Type of AFHypertensionCHFDiabetesPrevious stroke/TIA
#1PNPFemale602ParoxysmalYesNoYesNo
#2PNPFemale621ParoxysmalYesNoNoNo
#3Haemorrhagic strokeMale691PersistentNoNoNoNo
#4Ischaemic strokeFemale721PersistentYesNoNoNo
#5Ischaemic strokeFemale756PersistentYesNoYesYes
ComplicationGenderAgeCHADS2Type of AFHypertensionCHFDiabetesPrevious stroke/TIA
#1PNPFemale602ParoxysmalYesNoYesNo
#2PNPFemale621ParoxysmalYesNoNoNo
#3Haemorrhagic strokeMale691PersistentNoNoNoNo
#4Ischaemic strokeFemale721PersistentYesNoNoNo
#5Ischaemic strokeFemale756PersistentYesNoYesYes

PNP, phrenic nerve palsy; AF, atrial fibrillation; CHF, congestive heart failure; TIA, transient ischaemic attack.

Discussion

Main findings

This is the first multicentre study specifically aimed at collecting data regarding the incidence of complications with permanent sequelae in an unselected population of patients undergoing CA for AF by means of OIC. No procedure-related death was reported. Out of a cumulative complication rate of 3.7%, only 0.2% of patients developed permanent sequelae. Complications were more common when CA was performed in females and by less experienced operators.

Complications in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

The demonstration of superiority of CA over antiarrhythmic therapy in the management of several settings of AF patients3–5 has greatly increased the procedure of AF CA in the last decade.19,20 Despite technological improvements, CA of AF is still affected by a high amount of complications mainly related to the extension of lesions in the left atrium, the need of a deep anticoagulation, and the increasing number of centres starting to approach AF ablation.12,17,21 Thrombo-embolic complications seem to be affected by ablation technologies and by energy.22,23 In particular, OICs have been reported to reduce the risk of thrombus formation at the electrode–tissue interface, and the risk of steam pop.24 On the other hand, OICs deliver a large amount of saline solution during prolonged ablation procedures, and make deeper and larger lesions that might increase the risk of pericardial effusion or perforation.

Our study is the first to be designed to evaluate the complications during radiofrequency CA for AF by means of OICs, with an overall complication rate of 3.7%, slightly lower than that reported by recent multicentre studies using different technologies.12,18,21 Also, the rate of thrombo-embolic complications (0.3%) and pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade (0.8%) seems to confirm the safety of OICs, as recently reported.14,16,17

We found an increase of complication rate when procedures were performed by less experienced operators. This finding is consistent with the observation that the operators' experience and the hospital volume related to better outcomes.12,21

Complications with permanent sequelae

The more feared complications of CA are obviously those leading to death or to permanent sequelae.13 In the present study, only a 0.2% of permanent sequelae was reported. Two of these were permanent symptomatic phrenic nerve palsy occurred during ablation of the right PVs. Impedance monitoring, and strict monitoring of phrenic nerve function by means of regular pacing of the nerve, from the superior vena cava and the left atrium, before ablation, are crucial to avoid this complication, and should become mandatory during ablation especially of the right PVs.

Two out of five permanent complications were related to embolic events. This observation underlines once again the need of an aggressive procedural and peri-procedural anticoagulation regimen. In particular, maintaining an ACT value ≥350 ms during ablation, and performing the procedure on warfarin have been effective in reducing such complications.25 However, some embolic events may have been caused by thermally induced blood clots and this phenomenon is totally unresponsive to anticoagulation.

Previous registries12,13,21 have reported a rate of death ranging from 0.1 to 0.46%. Although the low rate of death could require larger study populations to assess its true incidence, the lack of procedure-related death observed in our study further supports the safety of OICs.

Limitations

Unfortunately, we did not have a control group of patients undergoing CA with different technologies, such as cryoablation or multielectrode catheters associated with duty-cycled radiofrequency energy. For this reason, any conclusion on the superiority of one tool over the others can be derived from the present study. However, the safety profile of the OICs seems to be evident when comparing the present to the previously published data.

By study design, data collection focused on complications occurring within 1 month after ablation: some rare but feared complications like PV stenosis and late pericardial tamponade could be under-represented.

Clinical implications

Complications with permanent sequelae in CA for AF with the use of OICs are very rare and in 40% of the cases related to embolic events. Based on this evidence, it becomes acceptable to pay attention to a higher potential risk of haemorrhagic events to reduce dreadful cerebral embolic complications, particularly in females. The overall rate of complications of CA for AF by means of OICs is below 4%, but the hazard is increased when CA is performed by less experienced operators raising once again the issue of recommending a volume threshold to enhance the safety of the procedure.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Europace online.

Conflict of interest: C.T. is a Medtronic Inc. Board member and received payment for lectures from Medtronic Inc. and St Jude. All other authors have no conflicts to declare.

References

1
Camm
AJ
Lip
GYH
De Caterina
R
Savelieva
I
Atar
D
Honloser
SH
et al.
,
2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. An update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association
Europace
,
2012
, vol.
14
(pg.
1385
-
413
)
2
Wann
LS
Curtis
AB
January
CT
Ellenbogen
KA
Lowe
JE
Estes
NAM
et al.
,
ACCF/AHA/HRS 2011 Focused Update on the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (Updating 2006 Guideline): a Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
Circulation
,
2011
, vol.
123
(pg.
104
-
23
)
3
Wazni
OM
Marrouche
NF
Martin
DO
Verma
A
Bhargava
M
Saliba
W
et al.
,
Radiofrequency ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation. A randomized trial
JAMA
,
2005
, vol.
293
(pg.
2634
-
40
)
4
Oral
H
Pappone
C
Chugh
A
Good
E
Bogun
F
Pelosi
F
Jr
et al.
,
Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation
N Eng J Med
,
2006
, vol.
354
(pg.
934
-
94
)
5
Stabile
G
Bertaglia
E
Senatore
G
De Simone
A
Zoppo
F
Donnici
G
et al.
,
Catheter ablation treatment in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation: a prospective, multi-centre, randomized, controlled study (Catheter Ablation For The Cure Of Atrial Fibrillation Study)
Eur Heart J
,
2006
, vol.
27
(pg.
216
-
21
)
6
Calkins
H
Kuck
KH
Cappato
R
Brugada
J
Camm
AJ
Chen
SA
et al.
,
HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design
Europace
,
2012
, vol.
14
(pg.
528
-
606
2012
7
Cappato
R
Calkins
H
Chen
SH
Davies
W
Iesaka
Y
Kalman
J
et al.
,
Worldwide survey on methods, efficacy and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation
Circulation
,
2005
, vol.
111
(pg.
1100
-
5
)
8
Bertaglia
E
Zoppo
F
Tondo
C
Colella
A
Mantovan
R
Senatore
G
et al.
,
Early complications of pulmonary vein catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a multicenter prospective registry on procedural safety
Heart Rhythm
,
2007
, vol.
4
(pg.
1265
-
71
)
9
Dagres
N
Hindricks
G
Kottkamp
H
Sommer
P
Gaspar
T
Bode
K
et al.
,
Complications of atrial fibrillation ablation in a high-volume center in 1,000 procedures: still cause for concerne?
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
,
2009
, vol.
20
(pg.
1014
-
9
)
10
Cappato
R
Calkins
H
Chen
SA
Davies
W
Iesaka
Y
Kalman
J
et al.
,
Updated Worldwide Survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol
,
2010
, vol.
3
(pg.
32
-
8
)
11
Baman
TS
Jongnarangsin
K
Chugh
A
Suwanagool
A
Guiot
A
Madenci
A
et al.
,
Prevalence and predictors of complications of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
,
2011
, vol.
22
(pg.
626
-
31
)
12
Deshmukh
A
Patel
NJ
Pant
S
Shah
N
Chothani
A
Mehta
K
et al.
,
Inhospital complications associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States between 2000–2010: analysis of 93,801 procedures
Circulation
,
2013
, vol.
128
(pg.
2104
-
12
)
13
Cappato
R
Calkins
H
Chen
SA
Davies
W
Iesaka
Y
Kalman
J
et al.
,
Prevalence and causes of fatal outcome in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2009
, vol.
53
(pg.
1798
-
803
)
14
Waldo
AL
Wilber
DJ
Marchlinski
FE
Stevenson
WG
Aker
B
Ming Boo
L
et al.
,
Safety of the open-irrigated catheter for radiofrequency ablation: safety analysis from six clinical studies
Pace Clin Electrophysiol
,
2012
, vol.
35
(pg.
1081
-
9
)
15
Kanj
MH
Wazni
O
Fahmy
T
Thal
S
Patel
D
Elay
C
et al.
,
Pulmonary vein antral isolation using an open irrigation catheter for the treatment of atrial fibrillation
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
49
(pg.
1634
-
41
)
16
Scaglione
M
Blandino
A
Raimondo
C
Caponi
D
Di Donna
P
Toso
E
et al.
,
Impact of ablation catheter irrigation design on silent cerebral embolism after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: results from a pilot study
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
,
2012
, vol.
23
(pg.
801
-
5
)
17
Bertaglia
E
Fassini
G
Anselmino
M
Stabile
G
Grandinetti
G
Simone
AD
et al.
,
Comparison of ThermoCool(®) surround flow catheter versus ThermoCool(®) catheter in achieving persistent electrical isolation of pulmonary veins: a pilot study
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
,
2013
, vol.
24
(pg.
269
-
73
)
18
Bertaglia
E
Stabile
G
Pappone
A
Themistoclakis
S
Tondo
C
Sanctis
VD
et al.
,
Updated National Multicenter Registry on procedural safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
,
2013
19
Kneeland
PP
Fang
MC
,
Trends in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in the United States
J Hosp Med
,
2009
, vol.
4
(pg.
E1
-
5
)
20
Kumar
S
Walters
TE
Halloran
K
Morton
JB
Hepworth
G
Wong
CX
et al.
,
Ten-year trends in the use of catheter ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation vs. the use of coronary intervention for the treatment of ischaemic heart disease in Australia
Europace
,
2013
, vol.
15
(pg.
1702
-
9
)
21
Shah
RU
Freeman
JV
Shilane
D
Wang
PJ
Go
AS
Hlatky
MA
,
Procedural complications, rehospitalizations, and repeat procedures after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2012
, vol.
59
(pg.
143
-
9
)
22
Gaita
F
Leclerq
JF
Schumacher
B
Scaglione
M
Toso
E
Halimi
F
et al.
,
Incidence of silent cerebral thromboembolic lesions after atrial fibrillation ablation may change according to technology used: comparison of irrigated radiofrequency, multipolar nonirrigated catheter and cryoballoon
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
,
2011
, vol.
22
(pg.
961
-
8
)
23
Herrera Siklodi
C
Deneke
T
Hocini
M
Lehrmann
H
Shin
DI
Miyazaki
S
et al.
,
Incidence of asymptomatic intracranial embolic events after pulmonary vein isolation: comparison of different atrial fibrillation ablation technologies in a multicenter study
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2011
, vol.
58
(pg.
681
-
8
)
24
Yokoyama
K
Nakagawa
H
Wittkampf
FH
Pitha
JV
Lazzara
R
Jackman
WM
,
Comparison of electrode cooling between internal and open irrigation in radiofrequency ablation lesion depth and incidence of thrombus and steam pop
Circulation
,
2006
, vol.
113
(pg.
11
-
9
)
25
Santangeli
P
Di Biase
L
Horton
R
Burkhardt
JD
Sanchez
J
Al-Ahmad
A
et al.
,
Ablation of atrial fibrillation under therapeutic warfarin reduces periprocedural complications: evidence from a meta-analysis
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol
,
2012
, vol.
5
(pg.
302
-
11
)

Supplementary data