-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
C Stellbrink, A.-M Sinha, B Diem, A Auricchio, S Boccanelli, J Brugada, H Klein, J Morgan, L Padeletti, E Aliot, P Hanrath, on behalf of the PACMAN Investigators, Implantable card ioverter-defibrillators with or without cardiac resynchronization therapy — multiple therapy in a single device: a review with special reference to the PACIVIAN study, European Heart Journal Supplements, Volume 4, Issue suppl_D, April 2002, Pages D88–D94, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1520-765X(02)90165-3
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Patients with heart failure and ventricular conduction disturbance benefit haemodynamically from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but reduced mortality with CRT has not been demonstrated. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) reduced sudden death, which accounts for more than 50% of heart failure mortality. This review focuses on data from trials on ICD and CRT treatment in heart failure patients. The design of one study — the Pacing in Cardiomyopathies, a European Study (PACMAN) — is presented. Current recruitment in this trial indicates that 30% of patients receiving CRT require ICD backup. Ongoing larger trials will determine the true benefit of ICD and CRT in heart failure patients.
References
The MERIT-HF Investigators. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF).
The Antiarrhythmic Versus Implantable Defibrillator (AVID) Investigators. A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias.