Abstract

Despite major improvements in primary and secondary prevention, a flattening in the improvement of survival curves of patients with or at risk of acute myocardial infarction has been reached in recent years. Pharmacological therapies that reduce LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels have shown incremental clinical and vascular benefits according to the achieved LDL-C levels. However, a non-negligible rate of events still occurs in patients achieving very low LDL-C levels. In addition to risk factors related to inflammatory pathways, emerging lipid-related factors seem to account for this residual atherothrombotic burden, with accumulative evidence establishing lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) as the single greatest emerging risk factor. Ongoing trials will evaluate whether the pharmacological reduction of Lp(a) levels reduces the incidence of cardiac events, and therefore may represent a novel therapeutic target. In addition, implementing atherosclerosis imaging may help improve traditional clinical scores to identify better patients at high risk of cardiovascular events who may benefit more from early and effective treatment strategies. In the era of tailored medicine, direct imaging of atherosclerosis can play a crucial role in helping clinicians better stratify patient risk and patients better understand the burden of their disease, ultimately improving medication adherence and goal attainment.

Introduction

Atherosclerotic coronary artery disease still represents the first individual cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with its deadliest manifestation being acute myocardial infarction (MI). Over the past decades, several efforts have been made to improve risk stratification and reduce the occurrence of acute MI in both primary and secondary prevention. However, a flattening in the survival curves improvement has been reached and a not negligible rate of events still occurs in patients with or at risk of acute MI.1–3

Is LDL-C lowering still the primary goal?

With a large body of evidence demonstrating its effectiveness in preventing cardiovascular events, LDL-C is still reportedly the most effective strategy for lowering the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Long acknowledged as a major modifiable risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), LDL-C has been shown in multiple clinical trials to significantly reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including acute MI, when effectively lowered. A substantial amount of research, including trials on statins and more recent agents such pro-protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, supports these findings.

The ground-breaking Heart Protection Study (HPS) was among the first study to demonstrate a significant reduction in non-fatal MI and coronary death by ∼25% with statin therapy.4–6

Subsequently, the development of more potent lipid-lowering agents, such as PCSK9 inhibitors, has brought new pharmacological opportunities in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Large-scale trials such ODYSSEY Outcomes (PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab) and FOURIER (PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab) consistently showed that a highly intensive LDL-C lowering with PCSK9 inhibition reduces cardiovascular events, including acute MI. In FOURIER, the incidence of AMI was consistently lower in evolocumab-treated patients who had on-treatment LDL-C values of over 30 mg/dL than in controls (3.4 vs. 4.6%, P < 0.001).7–10

In parallel with clinical studies, imaging trials have robustly contributed to broadening the current understanding of the vascular effects of intensive LDL-C lowering therapies.11–16

Collectively, this accumulating evidence corroborates the notion that aggressive LDL-C lowering remains a cornerstone of preventing heart attacks and minimizing cardiovascular risk.

Secondary lipid-related goals: lipoprotein (a), hope, or hype?

When looking at survival curves of recent randomized trials on cardiovascular prevention it appears clear that a non-negligible rate of events still occurs in patients achieving very low on-treatment LDL-C levels.2,7,17–20

Thus, the interest in lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) as a new therapeutic target is growing. A Mendelian randomization analysis estimated a required Lp(a)-lowering effect size of 65.7 mg/dL to reach the same effect as a 38.67 mg/dL lowering of LDL-C.21 In a recent analysis of the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial, Lp(a) lowering Lp(a) by alirocumab was an independent contributor to MACE reduction, suggesting that Lp(a) can be an independent treatment target after acute coronary syndrome.22 Additionally, patients receiving PCSK9 inhibitors after AMI showed less significant lipid plaque regression in the presence of elevated baseline Lp(a) levels.23 Accordingly, a growing body of evidence is testing the clinical value of selective targeting Lp(a). Previous large trials have already demonstrated the safety and efficacy of antisense oligonucleotides in potently reducing Lp(a) levels.24,25 Similarly, in the OCEAN[a]-DOSE trial, Olpasiran (siRNA molecule that disrupts expression of Lp(a), degrading apolipoprotein(a) mRNA) reduced the Lp(a) concentration by more than 95% compared with placebo, with nearly all patients who received Olpasiran having a Lp(a) concentration of <125 nmol per litre.26 Although no randomized placebo-controlled studies on outcomes are available to date, large studies are underway to demonstrate the prognostic impact of ad hoc reduction of Lp(a) levels. The ongoing Phase 3 HORIZON trial (Novartis Pharmaceuticals 2024; NCT04023552) will assess the impact of Lp(a) lowering with Pelacarsen—a liver-targeted antisense oligonucleotide that potently lowers Lp(a)—on major cardiovascular events in patients with established cardiovascular disease and baseline Lp(a) levels of at least 70 mg/dL (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04023552).

The importance of imaging atherosclerosis in primary and secondary prevention

Accurate assessment of cardiovascular risk is a key to sustainable cost-effective strategies aimed at improving the quality of life and survival of the general population. The latest 2021 cardiovascular prevention guidelines recommend the use of the Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation 2 (SCORE-2) to estimate the 10-year risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular diseases.3,27–30

Conclusions

In the current era, primary and secondary prevention of the deadliest event of coronary artery disease, namely acute MI, are still far from optimal in the general population. Lowering LDL-C levels is mandatory to substantially reduce risks according to the patient individual risk. However, although the desired level of LDL-c is reached, some patients still have a considerable cardiovascular residual risk linked to other elements, particularly Lp(a) levels. Ongoing trials will evaluate whether the reduction of Lp(a) levels reduces the incidence of cardiac events, and therefore represent a novel therapeutic target. Lastly, imaging of coronary atherosclerosis is warranted to ultimately improve preventive strategies and patient prognosis by directly visualizing the atherosclerotic burden and composition.

Funding

No funding provided.

Data availability

No new data were generated or analysed in support of this research.

Disclaimer

This paper was originally published in the Italian language as ‘Si può ridurre il rischio d'infarto? Studio dell'aterosclerosi e del profilo lipidico’, in the Volume degli Atti del Congresso “Conoscere e Cuare il Cuore 2025”, published by Centro per la Lotta contro l'Infarto for distribution at the CCC Conference. This paper was translated by Dr. Mario Albertucci, representative of the CLI Foundation, and republished with permission.

References

1

Nadarajah
 
R
,
Ludman
 
P
,
Appelman
 
Y
,
Brugaletta
 
S
,
Budaj
 
A
,
Bueno
 
H
 et al.  
Cohort profile: the ESC EURObservational research programme non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infraction (NSTEMI) registry
.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes
 
2022
;
9
:
8
15
.

2

Schwartz
 
GG
,
Steg
 
PG
,
Szarek
 
M
,
Bhatt
 
DL
,
Bittner
 
VA
,
Diaz
 
R
 et al.  
Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome
.
N Engl J Med
 
2018
;
379
:
2097
2107
.

3

Ray
 
KK
,
Aguiar
 
C
,
Arca
 
M
,
Connolly
 
DL
,
Eriksson
 
M
,
Ferrières
 
J
 et al.  
Use of combination therapy is associated with improved LDL cholesterol management: 1-year follow-up results from the European observational SANTORINI study
.
Eur J Prev Cardiol
 
2024
;
31
:
1792
1803
.

4

Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group
.
MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial
.
Lancet
 
2002
;
360
:
7
22
.

5

Baigent
 
C
,
Blackwell
 
L
,
Emberson
 
J
,
Holland
 
LE
,
Reith
 
C
,
Bhala
 
N
 et al.  
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials
.
Lancet
 
2010
;
376
:
1670
1681
.

6

Schubert
 
J
,
Lindahl
 
B
,
Melhus
 
H
,
Renlund
 
H
,
Leosdottir
 
M
,
Yari
 
A
 et al.  
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and statin intensity in myocardial infarction patients and major adverse outcomes: a Swedish nationwide cohort study
.
Eur Heart J
 
2021
;
42
:
243
252
.

7

Sabatine
 
MS
,
Giugliano
 
RP
,
Keech
 
AC
,
Honarpour
 
N
,
Wiviott
 
SD
,
Murphy
 
SA
 et al.  
Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease
.
N Engl J Med
 
2017
;
376
:
1713
1722
.

8

White
 
HD
,
Steg
 
PG
,
Szarek
 
M
,
Bhatt
 
DL
,
Bittner
 
VA
,
Diaz
 
R
 et al.  
Effects of alirocumab on types of myocardial infarction: insights from the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial
.
Eur Heart J
 
2019
;
40
:
2801
2809
.

9

Casula
 
M
,
Olmastroni
 
E
,
Boccalari
 
MT
,
Tragni
 
E
,
Pirillo
 
A
,
Catapano
 
AL
 et al.  
Cardiovascular events with PCSK9 inhibitors: an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
.
Pharmacol Res
 
2019
;
143
:
143
150
.

10

Schwartz
 
GG
,
Szarek
 
M
,
Bhatt
 
DL
,
Bittner
 
VA
,
Bujas-Bobanovic
 
M
,
Diaz
 
R
 et al.  
Transiently achieved very low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by statin and alirocumab after acute coronary syndrome are associated with cardiovascular risk reduction: the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial
.
Eur Heart J
 
2023
;
44
:
1408
1417
.

11

Biccirè
 
FG
,
Gatto
 
L
,
La Porta
 
Y
,
Pignatelli
 
P
,
Prati
 
F
,
Pastori
 
D
.
Effects of lipid lowering therapies on vulnerable plaque features: an updated narrative review of the literature
.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis
 
2023
;
10
:
260
.

12

Gatto
 
L
,
Alfonso
 
F
,
Paoletti
 
G
,
Burzotta
 
F
,
La Manna
 
A
,
Budassi
 
S
 et al.  
Relationship betweeen the amount and location of macrophages and clinical outcome: subanalysis of the CLIMA-study
.
Int J Cardiol
 
2022
;
346
:
8
12
.

13

Prati
 
F
,
Romagnoli
 
E
,
Gatto
 
L
,
La Manna
 
A
,
Burzotta
 
F
,
Ozaki
 
Y
 et al.  
Relationship between coronary plaque morphology of the left anterior descending artery and 12 months clinical outcome: the CLIMA study
.
Eur Heart J
 
2020
;
41
:
383
391
.

14

Biccirè
 
FG
,
Budassi
 
S
,
Ozaki
 
Y
,
Boi
 
A
,
Romagnoli
 
E
,
Di Pietro
 
R
 et al.  
Optical coherence tomography-derived lipid core burden index and clinical outcomes: results from the CLIMA registry
.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
 
2023
;
24
:
437
445
.

15

Erlinge
 
D
,
Maehara
 
A
,
Ben-Yehuda
 
O
,
Bøtker
 
HE
,
Maeng
 
M
,
Kjøller-Hansen
 
L
 et al.  
Identification of vulnerable plaques and patients by intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy and ultrasound (PROSPECT II): a prospective natural history study
.
Lancet
 
2021
;
397
:
985
995
.

16

Biccirè
 
FG
,
Kakizaki
 
R
,
Koskinas
 
KC
,
Ueki
 
Y
,
Häner
 
J
,
Shibutani
 
H
 et al.  
Lesion-level effects of LDL-C-lowering therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a post hoc analysis of the PACMAN-AMI trial
.
JAMA Cardiol
 
2024
;
9
:
1082
1092
.

17

Mach
 
F
,
Baigent
 
C
,
Catapano
 
AL
,
Koskinas
 
KC
,
Casula
 
M
,
Badimon
 
L
 et al.  
2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk
.
Eur Heart J
 
2020
;
41
:
111
188
.

18

Erqou
 
S
,
Kaptoge
 
S
,
Perry
 
PL
,
Di Angelantonio
 
E
,
Thompson
 
A
,
White
 
IR
 et al.  
Lipoprotein(a) concentration and the risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and nonvascular mortality
.
JAMA
 
2009
;
302
:
412
423
.

19

Nurmohamed
 
NS
,
Gaillard
 
EL
,
Malkasian
 
S
,
de Groot
 
RJ
,
Ibrahim
 
S
,
Bom
 
MJ
 et al.  
Lipoprotein(a) and long-term plaque progression, low-density plaque, and pericoronary inflammation
.
JAMA Cardiol
 
2024
;
9
:
826
834
.

20

Ridker
 
PM
,
Moorthy
 
MV
,
Cook
 
NR
,
Rifai
 
N
,
Lee
 
I-M
,
Buring
 
JE
.
Inflammation, cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), and 30-year cardiovascular outcomes in women
.
N Engl J Med
 
2024
;
391
:
2087
2097
.

21

Lamina
 
C
,
Kronenberg
 
F
.
Estimation of the required lipoprotein(a)-lowering therapeutic effect size for reduction in coronary heart disease outcomes: a Mendelian randomization analysis
.
JAMA Cardiol
 
2019
;
4
:
575
579
.

22

Bittner
 
VA
,
Szarek
 
M
,
Aylward
 
PE
,
Bhatt
 
DL
,
Diaz
 
R
,
Edelberg
 
JM
 et al.  
Effect of alirocumab on lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular risk after acute coronary syndrome
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 
2020
;
75
:
133
144
.

23

Koskinas
 
KC
,
Häner
 
J
,
Ueki
 
Y
,
Otsuka
 
T
,
Lonborg
 
J
,
Shibutani
 
H
 et al.  
Association of lipoprotein(a) with changes in coronary atherosclerosis in patients treated with alirocumab
.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
 
2024
;
17
:
e016683
.

24

Tsimikas
 
S
,
Karwatowska-Prokopczuk
 
E
,
Gouni-Berthold
 
I
,
Tardif
 
J-C
,
Baum
 
SJ
,
Steinhagen-Thiessen
 
E
 et al.  
Lipoprotein(a) reduction in persons with cardiovascular disease
.
N Engl J Med
 
2020
;
382
:
244
255
.

25

Viney
 
NJ
,
van Capelleveen
 
JC
,
Geary
 
RS
,
Xia
 
S
,
Tami
 
JA
,
Yu
 
RZ
 et al.  
Antisense oligonucleotides targeting apolipoprotein(a) in people with raised lipoprotein(a): two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trials
.
Lancet
 
2016
;
388
:
2239
2253
.

26

O'Donoghue
 
ML
,
Rosenson
 
RS
,
Gencer
 
B
,
López
 
J. AG
,
Lepor
 
NE
,
Baum
 
SJ
 et al.  
Small interfering RNA to reduce lipoprotein(a) in cardiovascular disease
.
N Engl J Med
 
2022
;
387
:
1855
1864
.

27

Visseren
 
FLJ
,
Mach
 
F
,
Smulders
 
YM
,
Carballo
 
D
,
Koskinas
 
KC
,
Bäck
 
M
 et al.  
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice
.
Eur Heart J
 
2021
;
42
:
3227
3337
.

28

Pastori
 
D
,
Biccirè
 
FG
,
Lip
 
GYH
,
Menichelli
 
D
,
Pignatelli
 
P
,
Barillà
 
F
 et al.  
Relation of atrial fibrillation to angiographic characteristics and coronary artery disease severity in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
.
Am J Cardiol
 
2020
;
141
:
1
6
.

29

SCOT-HEART Investigators
;
Newby
 
DE
,
Adamson
 
PD
,
Berry
 
C
,
Boon
 
NA
,
Dweck
 
MR
 et al.  
Coronary CT angiography and 5-year risk of myocardial infarction
.
N Engl J Med
 
2018
;
379
:
924
933
.

30

Biccirè
 
FG
,
Häner
 
J
,
Losdat
 
S
,
Ueki
 
Y
,
Shibutani
 
H
,
Otsuka
 
T
 et al.  
Concomitant coronary atheroma regression and stabilization in response to lipid-lowering therapy
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 
2023
;
82
:
1737
1747
.

Author notes

Conflict of interest: none declared.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.