-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Mauro Chiarito, Davide Cao, Samantha Sartori, Zhongjie Zhang, Birgit Vogel, Johny Nicholas, Carlo Andrea Pivato, Alessandro Spirito, Annerieke Tavenier, Mark Effron, Giulio G Stefanini, Usman Baber, Samir Kapadia, Sunil Rao, Timothy D Henry, Stuart Pocock, George Dangas, Annapoorna Kini, Roxana Mehran, 761 PRASUGREL OR CLOPIDOGREL IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES AT DIFFERENT THROMBOTIC RISK: RESULTS FROM THE PROMETHEUS STUDY, European Heart Journal Supplements, Volume 24, Issue Supplement_K, December 2022, suac121.154, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac121.154
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Potent P2Y12 inhibitors are recommended in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), although the optimal antithrombotic strategy should be tailored based on patients thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk profile. We evaluated if the benefits associated with prasugrel vs. clopidogrel in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are similar in patients with different thrombotic risk profiles.
PROMETHEUS was a multicenter observational study comparing prasugrel vs. clopidogrel in ACS patients undergoing PCI. Patients were defined at high thrombotic risk if presenting with a clinical and a procedural risk feature. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned revascularization. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using propensity-stratified analysis and with multivariable Cox regression.
Among 16,065 patients, 4,293 were defined at high and 11,772 at low-to-moderate thrombotic risk. Patients receiving prasugrel had less comorbidities and risk factors than those treated with clopidogrel, both in the high and low-to-moderate thrombotic risk strata. High thrombotic risk patients had increased rates of ischemic and bleeding events at 90-day and 1-year follow-up. Patients treated with prasugrel had a lower adjusted 1-year risk of MACE (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.96), irrespective of their thrombotic risk (pinteraction =0.32). Stratifying the study population by number of risk factors there was a significant interaction (pinteraction =0.026) for a greater reduction in MACE with prasugrel among patients with ≤1 thrombotic risk factor. The risk of clinically significant bleeding was similar in patients treated with prasugrel and clopidogrel.
Patients with ACS at high thrombotic risk who undergo PCI are at increased risk of adverse events at 1 year. Prasugrel, mainly reserved to patients with less comorbidities, reduced the risk of ischemic events both in patients at high and low-to-moderate thrombotic risk as compared with clopidogrel.
- acute coronary syndromes
- myocardial infarction
- clopidogrel
- fibrinolytic agents
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- ischemia
- hemorrhage
- cerebrovascular accident
- ischemic stroke
- cardiac event
- comorbidity
- follow-up
- thrombus
- revascularization
- cox proportional hazards models
- prasugrel
- adverse event
- risk of excessive or recurrent bleeding