-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Francesco Gentile, Alberto Aimo, James Lj Jannuzzi, Mark Richards, Carolyn Sp Lam, Rudolf A. De Boer, Laura Mg Meems, Roberto Latini, Lidia Staszewsky, Inder S. Anand, Jay N. Cohn, Thor Ueland, Lars Guellestad, Pal Aukrust, Hans-peter Brunner-la Rocca, Antoni Bayes-genis, Josep Lupon, Akiomi Yoshihisa, Michael Egstrup, Ida Gustafsson, Hanna K. Gaggin, Kai M. Eggers, Kurt Huber, Greg D. Gamble, Lieng H. Ling, Kui Toh Gerard Leong, Poh Shuah Daniel Yeo, Hean Yee Ong, Fazlur Jaufeerally, Tze P. Ng, Richard Troughton, Robert N. Doughty, Gerry Devlin, Mayanna Lund, Alberto Giannoni, Claudio Passino, Michele Emdin, Giuseppe Vergaro, 41 Circulating levels and prognostic cut-offs of sST2, high-sensitivity troponin T, and NT-proBNP in women vs. men with chronic heart failure, European Heart Journal Supplements, Volume 23, Issue Supplement_G, December 2021, suab139.017, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/suab139.017
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Limited evidence exists on sex-related differences in clinical value of biomarkers in chronic heart failure (HF). We aimed to define plasma levels, determinants, and optimal prognostic cut-offs of soluble suppression of tumourigenesis-2 (sST2), high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in female and male chronic HF patients.
Individual data of patients from the BIOS (Biomarkers In Heart Failure Outpatient Study) Consortium with sST2, hs-TnT, and NT-proBNP measured were analysed. The primary endpoint was a composite of 1-year cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization. The secondary endpoints were 5-year cardiovascular and all-cause death. The cohort included 4540 patients (age: 67 ± 12 years, LVEF 33 ± 13%, 1111 women, 25%). Women showed lower sST2 (24 vs. 27 ng/ml, P < 0.001) and hs-TnT level (15 vs. 20 ng/l, P < 0.001), and similar concentrations of NT-proBNP (1540 vs. 1505 ng/l, P = 0.408). Although the three biomarkers were confirmed as independent predictors of outcome in both sexes, the optimal prognostic cut-off was lower in women for sST2 (28 vs. 31 ng/ml) and hs-TnT (22 vs. 25 ng/l), while NT-proBNP cut-off was higher in women (2339 ng/l vs. 2145 ng/l). The use of sex-specific cut-offs improved risk prediction compared to the use of previously standardized prognostic cut-offs (Figure).
In patients with chronic HF, levels of sST2 and hs-TnT, but not of NT-proBNP are lower in women. Lower sST2 and hs-TnT and higher NT-proBNP cut-offs for risk stratification could be used in women.

Relative risk of adverse events across biomarkers-based subgroups of women and men with chronic heart failure. Patients were classified according to the number of biomarkers over the sex-specific prognostic cut-offs calculated for each endpoint. The subgroup with no elevated biomarkers was considered as reference category.